Sort by
Development of Sustainable Red Algae–Sisal Fiber Composite Films via Doctor Blading
Matthew Richards
,Joshua Baird
,Noah Serda
,Yanika Schneider
Posted: 04 December 2025
Viscoelastic Properties of Organosilicon Fluid Interlayer at Low-Frequency Shear Deformations
Tuyana Dembelova
,Badma Badmaev
,Aleksandr Mashanov
,Dari Dembelova
,Michael Ojovan
,Migmar Darmaev
Posted: 02 December 2025
Lignosulfonates as Surfactants to Stabilize Elemental Sulfur Dispersions
Tatiana N. Lugovitskaya
,Denis A. Rogozhnikov
Posted: 02 December 2025
Radiation Attenuation Simulation of 3D-Printed Polymers Across Variable Infill Densities and Phase Angles Using EpiXS Program
Toni Beth Guatato Lopez
,James Harold Paquibot Cabalhug
,Emmanuel Ramirez Arriola
,Marynella Laica Afable
,Ranier Jude Wendell Lorenzo
,Glenn Bryan B. Fronda
,Patrick Mecarandayo
,Gil Nonato Santos
,Rigoberto Advincula
,Alvie Asuncion Astronomo
+1 authors
This study investigates the modulation effects of varying infill densities and phase angles on the radiation attenuation properties of three 3D-printed polymers: acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), polylactic acid (PLA), and thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU). Using the EpiXS software for radiation attenuation simulations, the study assessed the linear attenuation coefficients (LAC) of the materials under different infill densities (30%, 50%, 70%, 90%, and 100%) and phase angles (0°, 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90°) for radiation in the 1-100 keV energy range, which corresponds to the X-ray spectrum. TPU demonstrated the highest attenuation values, with a baseline coefficient of 20.199 cm⁻¹ at 30% infill density, followed by PLA at 18.835 cm⁻¹, and ABS at 13.073 cm⁻¹. Statistical analysis via the Kruskal-Wallis test confirmed that infill density significantly impacts attenuation, while phase angle exhibited no significant effect, with p-values exceeding 0.05 across all materials. TPU showed the highest sensitivity to infill density, with a slope of 1.1194, compared to 0.7257 for ABS and 0.9251 for PLA, making TPU the most suitable candidate for radiation shielding applications, particularly in applications where flexibility and high attenuation are required. The findings support the potential of 3D printing to produce customized, cost-effective radiation protection gear for medical and industrial applications. Future work can further optimize material designs by exploring more complex infill geometries and testing under broader radiation spectra.
This study investigates the modulation effects of varying infill densities and phase angles on the radiation attenuation properties of three 3D-printed polymers: acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), polylactic acid (PLA), and thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU). Using the EpiXS software for radiation attenuation simulations, the study assessed the linear attenuation coefficients (LAC) of the materials under different infill densities (30%, 50%, 70%, 90%, and 100%) and phase angles (0°, 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90°) for radiation in the 1-100 keV energy range, which corresponds to the X-ray spectrum. TPU demonstrated the highest attenuation values, with a baseline coefficient of 20.199 cm⁻¹ at 30% infill density, followed by PLA at 18.835 cm⁻¹, and ABS at 13.073 cm⁻¹. Statistical analysis via the Kruskal-Wallis test confirmed that infill density significantly impacts attenuation, while phase angle exhibited no significant effect, with p-values exceeding 0.05 across all materials. TPU showed the highest sensitivity to infill density, with a slope of 1.1194, compared to 0.7257 for ABS and 0.9251 for PLA, making TPU the most suitable candidate for radiation shielding applications, particularly in applications where flexibility and high attenuation are required. The findings support the potential of 3D printing to produce customized, cost-effective radiation protection gear for medical and industrial applications. Future work can further optimize material designs by exploring more complex infill geometries and testing under broader radiation spectra.
Posted: 18 November 2025
Investigated the Sound Absorption Performance of Wood-Based Sandwich Panels with Reinforced BFRP, GFRP, and Jute Fabric
Abdurrahman Karaman
,Hikmet Yazıcı
Posted: 12 November 2025
Fused Filament Fabrication of Thermoplastics for Low Vacuum Applications
Daniel Carl Valmassei
,Mark Pitt
Posted: 11 November 2025
Preparation and Characterization of Thermo-Compressed Guar Gum/Microcrystalline Cellulose Composites for Applications in Sustainable Packaging
Prasong Srihanam
,Jenjira Jirum
,Pakin Noppawan
,Nuanchai Khotsaeng
,Yodthong Baimark
Posted: 06 November 2025
Dextrin-Derived Polymers for Oral Delivery: Swelling, Rheological Behavior, and Mucoadhesive Properties
Gjylije Hoti
,Sara Er-Rahmani
,Ibrahim Hussein
,Monica Argenziano
,Roberta Cavalli
,Anastasia Anceschi
,Adrián Matencio
,Francesco Trotta
,Fabrizio Caldera
Posted: 05 November 2025
Efficient Glycolysis of Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Catalyzed by Cyclic(alkyl)(amino)carbene Copper Complexes
Lei Zhou
,Irfan Purnawan
,Nurul Hidayati Fithriyah
,Mingxin Li
,Hao Huang
,Jiaqin He
,Yuanyou Wang
Posted: 03 November 2025
Recent Advances in Polymer Design through Machine Learning: A Short Review
Bita Yarahmadi
,Seyed Majid Majid Hashemianzadeh
Posted: 14 October 2025
From Polymerization to Pyrolysis: Mechanistic Pathways and Product Selectivity in Polyolefins and PVC in New Perspective
Tim Tetičkovič
,Dušan Klinar
,Klavdija Rižnar
,Darja Pečar
Posted: 14 October 2025
The Effect of the Recycling Process on the Performance of Thermoplastic Vulcanizates Containing Recycled Rubber from End-of-Life Tyres
Maialen Narvaez-Fagoaga
,Marina Montero-Escrivá
,Zenen Zepeda-Rodríguez
,Laura Diñeiro-García
,Fernando Martin Salamanca
,Ángel Marcos-Fernández
,Juan L. Valentín
Posted: 03 October 2025
How Method Matters: The Impact of Material Characterization Techniques on Liquid Silicone Rubber Injection Moulding Simulations
Maurício Azevedo
,Silvester Bolka
,Clemens Holzer
Posted: 01 October 2025
Effect of Zeolite Morphology and Loading on Local Segmental Dynamics and Crystallisation Behaviour of PDMS-Zeolite Composites
Tatjana Antonić Jelić
,Damir Klepac
,Leana Vratović
,Dalibor Merunka
,Jurica Jurec
,Marin Tota
,Kata Galić
,Srećko Valić
Posted: 01 October 2025
Developments in Biocompatible and Biodegradable Polymers: Design, Functionality, and Innovative Applications
Latifat Abdulsalam
,Sadam Abubakar
,Ikfa Permatasari
,Anas Abdulwahab Lawal
,Shihab Uddin
,Saleem Ullah
,Irshad Ahmad
Posted: 30 September 2025
Alginate: Impact on Food Micro-Structure and Functional Properties as Food Polymer
Habtamu Admassu
,Gadissa Mosisa
,Abebe Desalegn
,Gebeyehu Ayele
,Molla Abeje
Posted: 30 September 2025
Rheological, Thermal and Mechanical Properties of Blown Film Based on Starch and Clay Nanocomposites
Heidy Tatiana Criollo Guevara
,Lis Vanesa Ocoró Caicedo
,Jhon Jairo Rios Acevedo
,Marcelo Alexander Guancha Chalapud
,Carolina Caicedo
Posted: 30 September 2025
Amphiphilic Diblock Copolymers of Poly (N-Vinyl Pyrrolidone) and Poly (Vinyl Esters) Bearing N-Alkyl Side Chains for the Encapsulation of Curcumin and Indomethacin
Nikolaos V. Plachouras
,Aikaterini Maria Gkolemi
,Alexandros Argyropoulos
,Athanasios Bouzoukas
,Theodosia Panagiota Papazoglou
,Nikoletta Roka
,Marinos Pitsikalis
Posted: 30 September 2025
The Importance of Feedstock and Process Control on the Composition of Recovered Carbon Black
Christopher Jon Norris
,Antonio Lopez-Cerdan
,Peter Eaton
,Richard Moon
,Mark Murfitt
Posted: 26 September 2025
Effect of Mixing Time on the Thermal Stability and Activation Energies of NiO/PMMA Nanocomposites
Aytekin Ulutaş
Posted: 18 September 2025
of 29