Sort by
Symmetry in Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics
Jelena Vesic
Posted: 19 January 2026
Unified Evolution Equation
Yoshinori Shimizu
Posted: 13 January 2026
Information Flux Theory: A Reinterpretation of the Standard Model with a Single Fermion and the Origin of Gravity
Yoshinori Shimizu
Posted: 12 January 2026
The Prediction and the Verification of the Neutrino Masses
Engel Roza
Posted: 09 January 2026
Relativistic Plastino-Plastino Equation
Jhon-Mario Cordoba Pareja
,Lucas Quinsan Rocha
,Airton Deppman
Posted: 06 January 2026
Fluctuations of Temperature in the Polyakov-loop extended Nambu--Jona-Lasinio Model
He Liu
,Peng Wu
,Hong-Ming Liu
,Peng-Cheng Chu
Posted: 30 December 2025
On the Flavour States and the Mass States of Neutrinos
Engel Roza
Posted: 30 December 2025
Interpretation of New Particle Phenomena in Collider Experiments: Based on the "Elementary Particles-Fragments-Composite Particles" Framework of the Great Tao Model
Jiqing Zeng
Posted: 25 December 2025
Nanofusion: Plasmons Help to Accelerate Protons
Tamás Biró for the NAPLIFE Collaboration
Posted: 04 December 2025
Search for Possible Stable Structures in the Tccqs System
Linkai Lin
,Xiaohuang Hu
,Yuheng Xing
,Xinxing Wu
,Ning Xu
,Yuanrun Zhu
,Yue Tan
,Yuheng Wu
Posted: 03 December 2025
A Deterministic Charge-Lattice Model of Matter: Proton, Neutron, Quark Patterns, and Nuclear Fusion from ± Charge Geometry
Kuldeep Meel
We present a fundamental, deterministic charge-lattice framework in which protons, neutrons, quark-like patterns, electrons, photons, and all light nuclear processes arise from discrete positive (+) and negative (-) charge units arranged in stable 3 × 3 geometric configurations. In this formulation the proton is not composed of three fundamental quarks, but is instead a structurally stable 3 × 3 charge lattice containing five positive and four negative units, thereby reproducing its net charge of +1. The neutron is the complementary lattice containing four positive and five negative units, and becomes electrically neutral when stabilized by an external negative charge. The six “quark flavors” of the Standard Model emerge naturally as the six geometric projections of these 3 × 3 charge matrices. Thus, quarks are not elementary constituents but orientation-dependent charge patterns arising from the underlying lattice geometry. The framework yields a deterministic description of atomic and nuclear transformations. A hydrogen atom consists of one proton lattice and an external negative charge (electron). During hydrogen–hydrogen fusion, an external negative charge enters the nuclear lattice, one positive charge is expelled as a photon, and one proton lattice undergoes a structural reconfiguration into a neutron lattice. As a result, deuterium is formed without invoking probabilistic quantum transitions, solely through charge balancing and lattice rearrangement. This charge-lattice approach provides a unified, mechanical explanation for proton stability, neutron formation, photon emission, and the synthesis of light nuclei. It constitutes a testable and geometrically minimal alternative to the Standard Model quark hypothesis, offering experimentally distinguishable predictions for future high-resolution hadronic imaging and fusion spectroscopy. To enhance rigor, we include mathematical formulations for lattice energy, charge form factors, testable predictions with quantitative comparisons to experimental data (e.g., proton rms radius of 0.841 fm, deuterium binding energy of 2.224 MeV), and computational verifications.
We present a fundamental, deterministic charge-lattice framework in which protons, neutrons, quark-like patterns, electrons, photons, and all light nuclear processes arise from discrete positive (+) and negative (-) charge units arranged in stable 3 × 3 geometric configurations. In this formulation the proton is not composed of three fundamental quarks, but is instead a structurally stable 3 × 3 charge lattice containing five positive and four negative units, thereby reproducing its net charge of +1. The neutron is the complementary lattice containing four positive and five negative units, and becomes electrically neutral when stabilized by an external negative charge. The six “quark flavors” of the Standard Model emerge naturally as the six geometric projections of these 3 × 3 charge matrices. Thus, quarks are not elementary constituents but orientation-dependent charge patterns arising from the underlying lattice geometry. The framework yields a deterministic description of atomic and nuclear transformations. A hydrogen atom consists of one proton lattice and an external negative charge (electron). During hydrogen–hydrogen fusion, an external negative charge enters the nuclear lattice, one positive charge is expelled as a photon, and one proton lattice undergoes a structural reconfiguration into a neutron lattice. As a result, deuterium is formed without invoking probabilistic quantum transitions, solely through charge balancing and lattice rearrangement. This charge-lattice approach provides a unified, mechanical explanation for proton stability, neutron formation, photon emission, and the synthesis of light nuclei. It constitutes a testable and geometrically minimal alternative to the Standard Model quark hypothesis, offering experimentally distinguishable predictions for future high-resolution hadronic imaging and fusion spectroscopy. To enhance rigor, we include mathematical formulations for lattice energy, charge form factors, testable predictions with quantitative comparisons to experimental data (e.g., proton rms radius of 0.841 fm, deuterium binding energy of 2.224 MeV), and computational verifications.
Posted: 02 December 2025
Quantum Field Theory of Dirac Magnetic Monopoles and Their Interpretation as Cold Dark Matter WIMPs
Rainer W. Kühne
Posted: 19 November 2025
Nilpotent (Anti-)Co-BRST Symmetries and Their Consequences in a 4D Field-Theoretic System
Rudra Malik
Posted: 03 November 2025
Finite Element Analysis of Electrostatic Fields in Gas Ionization Chambers for Laser-Driven Proton Therapy
Xicheng Xie
,Yuanyuan Zhang
,Kun Zhu
,Kedong Wang
,Kai Wang
,Xueqing Yan
This paper presents a finite element analysis of the electrostatic field in gas ionization chambers used for beam diagnostics in laser-accelerated proton therapy systems. With the advent of laser-driven proton accelerators, such as the CLAPA-II project, there is a growing need for precise beam monitoring systems capable of handling high peak currents and large energy dispersion. Gas ionization chambers are widely employed for this purpose due to their reliability and accuracy. Using ANSYS software, this study establishes a detailed electrostatic finite element model of a multi-electrode ionization chamber. Key steps include model simplification, gas region definition, regional meshing, and solver selection. The analysis demonstrates the convergence of the electrostatic field solution and validates the model’s accuracy. The proposed modeling approach not only enhances computational efficiency but also facilitates interoperability with other simulation platforms such as Garfield++. This work provides a reliable foundation for optimizing ionization chamber design and improving beam diagnostic precision in advanced proton therapy applications.
This paper presents a finite element analysis of the electrostatic field in gas ionization chambers used for beam diagnostics in laser-accelerated proton therapy systems. With the advent of laser-driven proton accelerators, such as the CLAPA-II project, there is a growing need for precise beam monitoring systems capable of handling high peak currents and large energy dispersion. Gas ionization chambers are widely employed for this purpose due to their reliability and accuracy. Using ANSYS software, this study establishes a detailed electrostatic finite element model of a multi-electrode ionization chamber. Key steps include model simplification, gas region definition, regional meshing, and solver selection. The analysis demonstrates the convergence of the electrostatic field solution and validates the model’s accuracy. The proposed modeling approach not only enhances computational efficiency but also facilitates interoperability with other simulation platforms such as Garfield++. This work provides a reliable foundation for optimizing ionization chamber design and improving beam diagnostic precision in advanced proton therapy applications.
Posted: 28 October 2025
Gamma and Neutron Irradiation Effects on Wavelength Shifting Materials for Nuclear and High Energy Physics Applications
Jessica Scifo
,Beatrice D’Orsi
,Francesco Filippi
,Silvia Cesaroni
,Andrea Colangeli
,Ilaria Di Sarcina
,Basilio Esposito
,Davide Flammini
,Stefano Loreti
,Daniele Marocco
+3 authors
Posted: 20 October 2025
Divided-Qubit Noise-Tolerant Strategy for Bell State Preparation in Qiskit
Ou Yang
,Wenming Sun
Posted: 08 October 2025
The Single Monad as the Minimal Magnetic Monopole: Ontological Foundations of Charge, Field, and Polarization in the Duality of Time Theory
Mohamed Haj Yousef
Posted: 04 October 2025
Quantum Simulation of Neutron Superfluid Under Strong Gravitational Fields: Topological Effects
Ou yang
,Wenming Sun
Posted: 01 October 2025
Optical Properties and QPOs in AdS Black Holes with a Cloud of Strings and Quintessence-like Field in NLED Scenario
Faizuddin Ahmed
,Ahmad Al-Badawi
,İzzet SAKALLI
Posted: 01 October 2025
A Unified 6-Terms Formula for Nuclear Binding Energy with a Single Set of Energy Coefficients for Z = 1–140
U. V. S. Seshavatharam
,S. Lakshminarayana
Posted: 26 September 2025
of 11