Sort by
Effects of Dark Matter on the Properties of Strange Quark Stars
Jing Huang
,Gan Wu
,Xiao-Yang Zhang
,Jin-Biao Wei
,Huan Chen
Posted: 27 February 2026
Understanding the Mystery of the Avogadro Number and Renaming SI Avogadro Constant as ‘Einstein-Perrin-Loschmidt-Avogadro-Newton’ Ratio
U. V. S. Seshavatharam
,T. Gunavardhana Naidu
,S. Lakshminarayana
Posted: 27 February 2026
Charged-Current Neutrino-Induced Single-Pion Production in the Superscaling Approach and the Relativistic Distorted-Wave Impulse Approximation
Jesus Gonzalez-Rosa
,Alexis Nikolakopoulos
,Maria B. Barbaro
,Juan A. Caballero
,Raúl González-Jiménez
,Guillermo D. Megias
Posted: 24 February 2026
Recent Advances in Charmed Baryon Measurements at Belle and Belle II
Yuewen Zhong
,Sen Jia
,Chengping Shen
Posted: 06 February 2026
The Reason Why Neutrinos Are Left-Handed
Engel Roza
Posted: 03 February 2026
The Spherical Nucleus Puzzle and the Discovery of the New Spherical-like γ-Soft Spectra
Tao Wang
Posted: 31 January 2026
Halo Phenomena in Light to Medium Mass Nuclei with Three-Body Models
Lorenzo Fortunato
Posted: 26 January 2026
Flux-Space Flow Matching in 2D Compact U(1) with Spatial β-Conditioning
Danyang Li
Posted: 23 January 2026
Symmetry in Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics
Jelena Vesic
Posted: 19 January 2026
Unified Evolution Equation
Yoshinori Shimizu
Posted: 13 January 2026
Information Flux Theory: A Reinterpretation of the Standard Model with a Single Fermion and the Origin of Gravity
Yoshinori Shimizu
Posted: 12 January 2026
The Prediction and the Verification of the Neutrino Masses
Engel Roza
Posted: 09 January 2026
Relativistic Plastino-Plastino Equation
Jhon-Mario Cordoba Pareja
,Lucas Quinsan Rocha
,Airton Deppman
Posted: 06 January 2026
Fluctuations of Temperature in the Polyakov-loop extended Nambu--Jona-Lasinio Model
He Liu
,Peng Wu
,Hong-Ming Liu
,Peng-Cheng Chu
Posted: 30 December 2025
On the Flavour States and the Mass States of Neutrinos
Engel Roza
Posted: 30 December 2025
Interpretation of New Particle Phenomena in Collider Experiments: Based on the "Elementary Particles-Fragments-Composite Particles" Framework of the Great Tao Model
Jiqing Zeng
Posted: 25 December 2025
Nanofusion: Plasmons Help to Accelerate Protons
Tamás Biró for the NAPLIFE Collaboration
Posted: 04 December 2025
Search for Possible Stable Structures in the Tccqs System
Linkai Lin
,Xiaohuang Hu
,Yuheng Xing
,Xinxing Wu
,Ning Xu
,Yuanrun Zhu
,Yue Tan
,Yuheng Wu
Posted: 03 December 2025
A Deterministic Charge-Lattice Model of Matter: Proton, Neutron, Quark Patterns, and Nuclear Fusion from ± Charge Geometry
Kuldeep Meel
We present a fundamental, deterministic charge-lattice framework in which protons, neutrons, quark-like patterns, electrons, photons, and all light nuclear processes arise from discrete positive (+) and negative (-) charge units arranged in stable 3 × 3 geometric configurations. In this formulation the proton is not composed of three fundamental quarks, but is instead a structurally stable 3 × 3 charge lattice containing five positive and four negative units, thereby reproducing its net charge of +1. The neutron is the complementary lattice containing four positive and five negative units, and becomes electrically neutral when stabilized by an external negative charge. The six “quark flavors” of the Standard Model emerge naturally as the six geometric projections of these 3 × 3 charge matrices. Thus, quarks are not elementary constituents but orientation-dependent charge patterns arising from the underlying lattice geometry. The framework yields a deterministic description of atomic and nuclear transformations. A hydrogen atom consists of one proton lattice and an external negative charge (electron). During hydrogen–hydrogen fusion, an external negative charge enters the nuclear lattice, one positive charge is expelled as a photon, and one proton lattice undergoes a structural reconfiguration into a neutron lattice. As a result, deuterium is formed without invoking probabilistic quantum transitions, solely through charge balancing and lattice rearrangement. This charge-lattice approach provides a unified, mechanical explanation for proton stability, neutron formation, photon emission, and the synthesis of light nuclei. It constitutes a testable and geometrically minimal alternative to the Standard Model quark hypothesis, offering experimentally distinguishable predictions for future high-resolution hadronic imaging and fusion spectroscopy. To enhance rigor, we include mathematical formulations for lattice energy, charge form factors, testable predictions with quantitative comparisons to experimental data (e.g., proton rms radius of 0.841 fm, deuterium binding energy of 2.224 MeV), and computational verifications.
We present a fundamental, deterministic charge-lattice framework in which protons, neutrons, quark-like patterns, electrons, photons, and all light nuclear processes arise from discrete positive (+) and negative (-) charge units arranged in stable 3 × 3 geometric configurations. In this formulation the proton is not composed of three fundamental quarks, but is instead a structurally stable 3 × 3 charge lattice containing five positive and four negative units, thereby reproducing its net charge of +1. The neutron is the complementary lattice containing four positive and five negative units, and becomes electrically neutral when stabilized by an external negative charge. The six “quark flavors” of the Standard Model emerge naturally as the six geometric projections of these 3 × 3 charge matrices. Thus, quarks are not elementary constituents but orientation-dependent charge patterns arising from the underlying lattice geometry. The framework yields a deterministic description of atomic and nuclear transformations. A hydrogen atom consists of one proton lattice and an external negative charge (electron). During hydrogen–hydrogen fusion, an external negative charge enters the nuclear lattice, one positive charge is expelled as a photon, and one proton lattice undergoes a structural reconfiguration into a neutron lattice. As a result, deuterium is formed without invoking probabilistic quantum transitions, solely through charge balancing and lattice rearrangement. This charge-lattice approach provides a unified, mechanical explanation for proton stability, neutron formation, photon emission, and the synthesis of light nuclei. It constitutes a testable and geometrically minimal alternative to the Standard Model quark hypothesis, offering experimentally distinguishable predictions for future high-resolution hadronic imaging and fusion spectroscopy. To enhance rigor, we include mathematical formulations for lattice energy, charge form factors, testable predictions with quantitative comparisons to experimental data (e.g., proton rms radius of 0.841 fm, deuterium binding energy of 2.224 MeV), and computational verifications.
Posted: 02 December 2025
Quantum Field Theory of Dirac Magnetic Monopoles and Their Interpretation as Cold Dark Matter WIMPs
Rainer W. Kühne
Posted: 19 November 2025
of 11