Sort by
Experimental Analysis of Motion Response, Mooring Loads, and Failure Redundancy of an Eight-Point System for the OCTABUOY Platform
Haitao Xu
,Hong Zhou
,Xiao Xu
Posted: 15 May 2026
Experimental Study on Hydrodynamic Characteristics of a Disk-Shaped Buoy Using a Large-Scale Wave Flume
Zhonghua Tan
,Hanbao Chen
,Songgui Chen
,Ning Guan
,Yingni Luan
,Wenjun Shen
Posted: 14 May 2026
Assessing Coastal Vulnerability in Al Hoceima Bay, Morocco, Using a GIS-Based Coastal Vulnerability Index (CVI)
Youssef Fannassi
,Younes Oubaki
,Zhour Ennouali
,Karderic Williams
,Aicha Benmohammadi
,Ali Masria
Posted: 12 May 2026
Numerical Study on the Evolution Characteristics of the Bubble Dynamics and Free Surface Structures in Extremely Shallow Water Explosion
Wenbo Zhao
,Guocang Liu
,Qi Kong
,Yunlong Liu
,Yu Wang
,Jincheng Gao
Posted: 05 May 2026
Techno-Economic and Multi-Criteria Evaluation of LNG Regasification Alternatives under Capacity Scaling
Choi Hyun Cheol
,Kim Sung Ji
,Kim Hee Seok
,Emmanuel Brilian Tangka
,Lee Sang Deuk
This study evaluates the techno-economic feasibility of LNG regasification alternatives, including offshore platform conversion, floating storage and regasification unit (FSRU) retrofit, and onshore LNG terminals, under conceptual design conditions at a capacity of 100 MMSCFD. The analysis integrates cost estimation, project schedule, and technical maturity within a multi-criteria decision-making framework based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), combining quantitative techno-economic results with expert judgment to support structured comparison of alternatives. Cost estimation is conducted using two approaches, namely cost–capacity scaling and analogous estimation, to examine their influence on feasibility outcomes. The results indicate that the conventional scaling method, using an exponent of 0.6, produces inconsistent results across configurations, overestimating costs for offshore-based systems while underestimating costs for onshore LNG terminals. Back-calculation of effective scaling exponents yields values of approximately 0.43 for offshore platform conversion, 0.37 for FSRU retrofit, and 0.78 for onshore LNG terminals, demonstrating that cost–capacity relationships are configuration-dependent and cannot be represented using a single uniform exponent. The AHP evaluation, conducted under two scenarios based on the applied cost estimation methods, shows that offshore platform conversion consistently achieves the highest feasibility ranking, followed by FSRU retrofit and onshore LNG terminals. While the ranking remains unchanged, the choice of cost estimation method influences the magnitude of score differences, affecting the strength of preference among alternatives. These findings highlight the limitations of conventional scaling approaches and demonstrate that offshore platform conversion can serve as a cost-competitive and time-efficient alternative for LNG infrastructure development, particularly in regions with existing offshore assets.
This study evaluates the techno-economic feasibility of LNG regasification alternatives, including offshore platform conversion, floating storage and regasification unit (FSRU) retrofit, and onshore LNG terminals, under conceptual design conditions at a capacity of 100 MMSCFD. The analysis integrates cost estimation, project schedule, and technical maturity within a multi-criteria decision-making framework based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), combining quantitative techno-economic results with expert judgment to support structured comparison of alternatives. Cost estimation is conducted using two approaches, namely cost–capacity scaling and analogous estimation, to examine their influence on feasibility outcomes. The results indicate that the conventional scaling method, using an exponent of 0.6, produces inconsistent results across configurations, overestimating costs for offshore-based systems while underestimating costs for onshore LNG terminals. Back-calculation of effective scaling exponents yields values of approximately 0.43 for offshore platform conversion, 0.37 for FSRU retrofit, and 0.78 for onshore LNG terminals, demonstrating that cost–capacity relationships are configuration-dependent and cannot be represented using a single uniform exponent. The AHP evaluation, conducted under two scenarios based on the applied cost estimation methods, shows that offshore platform conversion consistently achieves the highest feasibility ranking, followed by FSRU retrofit and onshore LNG terminals. While the ranking remains unchanged, the choice of cost estimation method influences the magnitude of score differences, affecting the strength of preference among alternatives. These findings highlight the limitations of conventional scaling approaches and demonstrate that offshore platform conversion can serve as a cost-competitive and time-efficient alternative for LNG infrastructure development, particularly in regions with existing offshore assets.
Posted: 30 April 2026
Optimizing the Rate Constant of the Primary Zeldovich Reaction for NO Formation in a Marine Four-Stroke Medium-Speed Diesel Engine
Branko Lalić
,Tatjana Stanivuk
,Karlo Bratić
Posted: 27 April 2026
An Integrated Framework for Safe and Efficient AUV Navigation: Synergizing Enhanced Path Planning, Curvature-Adaptive Tracking, and Information-Driven 3D Exploration
Mingming Xiao
,Yuliang Wen
,Jiaheng Li
,Naiyao Liang
,Dan Xiang
Posted: 16 April 2026
Advancing Dolphin Acoustic Monitoring: A Comprehensive Whistle Classification Framework
Ming Xiang
,Luobin Wang
,Yankun Chen
,Kangrong Li
,Zhengqiao Zhao
,Jie Chen
Posted: 15 April 2026
A Risk-Driven Maritime Patrol Route Optimization Framework for IUU Fishing Surveillance Using Multi-Source AIS and SAR Data Fusion
Songtao Hu
,Qianyue Zhang
,Yiming Wang
,Xiaokang Wang
Posted: 14 April 2026
Bayesian-Optimized Neural Networks with High-Fidelity FEM for Intelligent Residual Strength Prediction in Damaged Ships
Jianxiao Deng
,Fei Peng
,Jinlei Mu
,Hailiang Hou
Posted: 09 April 2026
Integrated Spatial Planning as a Framework for Climate Adaptation in Coastal and Marine Systems
Francisco Javier Córdoba-Donado
,Vicente Negro-Valdecantos
,Gregorio Gomez-Pina
,Juan J. Muñoz-Pérez
,Luis J. Moreno Blasco
Posted: 07 April 2026
Comparative Experimental and Numerical Evaluation of the Flow Field at the Stern of a Hull Form
Dimitris Liarokapis
,Gregory Grigoropoulos
,George Tzabiras
Posted: 01 April 2026
Sea-State-Conditioned Motion Response of Berthed Ships Using Field Measurements from Multiple Vessels and Berths
Enock Tafadzwa Chekure
,Kumeshan Reddy
,John Fernandes
Posted: 19 March 2026
Research on Navigation Method for Subsea Drilling Robot Based on Inertial Navigation and Odometry
Yingjie Liu
,Peng Zhou
,Feng Xiao
,Chenyang Li
,Junhui Li
,Jiawang Chen
,Ziqiang Ren
Posted: 11 March 2026
Research on Ship Route Planning Based on an Improved Theta* Algorithm
Junwei Dong
,Ze Sun
,Peng Zhang
,Jiale Zhang
,Chen Chen
,Run Qian
Posted: 06 March 2026
An Empirical Examination of the Adverse and Favorable Effects of Marine Environmental Conditions on the Durability of Optical-Fiber Submarine Cables
Yukitoshi Ogasawara
Posted: 02 March 2026
A Methodological Framework for Cognitive AI Integration in Marine CAD Environments for Ship Design: Application to Pipe Routing
Diego Fernandez-Casado
,Rodrigo Pérez Fernández
Posted: 26 February 2026
Sustainable Risk Management of Damage to Seaport Infrastructure Caused by Vessel Impacts
Teresa Abramowicz-Gerigk
Posted: 17 February 2026
Quantitative Assessment of Consistency Between IMO DCS and EU MRV Systems Using Large-Scale Operational Data
Hyunju Lee
,Hyerim Bae
Posted: 16 February 2026
Enhanced Motion Prediction of Semi-Submersible Platform Using Bayesian Neural Network and Field Monitoring Data
Song Li
,Jia-wang Chen
Posted: 02 February 2026
of 20