SpecCal-Transfer: Physics-Guided Augmentation-Based Spectral Calibration Transfer for Reagent-Strip Urinalysis
Ashenafi Belihu Tadesse
,Cheng-Hao Ko
Posted: 27 October 2026
Phloroglucinol α-Pyrones of Helichrysum arenarium, Helichrysum stoechas and Achyrocline satureioides: Automated UHPLC–Orbitrap–MS Annotation
Yulian Voynikov
,Teodor Marinov
,Paraskev Nedialkov
Posted: 22 October 2026
ZIF-8/Graphene Oxide Nanocomposite Modified Electrode for Electrochemical Detection of Trimethylamine as a Freshness Indicator in Crayfish
Shuo Duan
,Chunyan Liao
,Jing Zhao
,Yongjiang Zhang
,Yan Liu
,Qiao Wang
,Huang Dai
Posted: 21 October 2026
Tipping Points and Risks of False Conformity Decisions in a Long-Term Stability Study of a Substance, Material or Object — A Perspective
Ilya Kuselman
,Valerie N. Livina
,Francesca R. Pennecchi
,Anna Ballario
,D. Brynn Hibbert
,Angelique Botha
,Tamar Gadrich
Posted: 15 October 2026
Organic Residues and Cultural Memory: A Systematic Review of Archaeochemical Evidence in Reconstructing Ancient Foodways and Ritual Practices
Leonel C. Mendoza
,Jermaine Ritzchelle D. Marquez-Mendoza
,Oliver B. Villaflores
Posted: 12 October 2026
Signal-Amplification Strategies for Gold-Nanoparticle Lateral Flow Assays: A Structured Review of Limit-of-Detection Improvement Relative to Conventional GNP-LFA
Itumeleng Lucky Mongadi
,Phumlani Selby Mdluli
,Nqobile Monate Mkolo
,Daliwonga Sithembele Magazi
,Bettina Chale-Matsau
,Kwazikwakhe Gabuza
,Christopher Thapelo Mamaregane
,Walter Bonke Mahlangu
Posted: 09 October 2026
Microplastic Release from Drinking Water Contact Materials: Material-Specific Responses to Chlorination and Implications for Consumer Exposure
Rodrigo D.M. Cordeiro
,Ana Penetra
,Rui N. Carneiro
,Vitor V. Cardoso
,Cristina M. M. Almeida
Posted: 05 October 2026
UPLC–MS/MS Determination of Twenty-Four Cannabinoids in Commercial Cannabis Oils and Gummy Edibles: Potency, Label Accuracy, and Product Quality Assessment
Abigail Castellanos
,Siyun Yang
,Hui Li
,Qiang Li
,Pia Poma
,Mingjing Sun
Posted: 02 October 2026
Universal Suitability and Sustainability Index (USSI): A Comprehensive Framework for Greener HPLC-UV/Vis Methods
Sami El Deeb
,Mohammed Al Broumi
,Reem K. Almarsafy
,Maria Kristina Parr
Posted: 28 September 2026
1H-NMR Profiling as a Tool for Assessing Frass Hygienization and Storage Stability
Rubén Gil-Gonzalo
,Palmira Villa-Valverde
,Inmaculada Aranaz
,Isabel Cambero
,David Castejón
Posted: 28 September 2026
Residual Caffeine in Commercial Decaffeinated Coffee Products: Development and Validation of an HPLC–UV Method with Regulatory Compliance and Consumer Safety Assessment
Ibrahim Al-Sheikh Ali
,Lina Soubh
,Abdul Hakim Nattouf
Posted: 20 September 2026
Exploratory Quantitative Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) for Sodium Acetate
Wenfa Ng
Posted: 16 September 2026
Comparative Validation of Vanadium(III) Chloride Reduction and Standard Methods for Nitrate Quantification in Organic-Rich Tropical Waters
Olga-Inés Vallejo-Vargas
,Edwin Alzate-Rodriguez
,Mariana Espinoza
,Natalia Londoño
,Leonardo Beltrán-Angarita
Posted: 15 September 2026
Synthesis and Characterization of Two L-Aspartyl-L-Phenylalanine Methyl Ester Dipeptide Chiral Ionic Liquids and Evaluation of Enantiomeric Recognition Properties Using Fluorescence Spectroscopy
Irene W. Kimaru
,Alex Zoey Slater
,Olivia Culbertson
,Emma Garn
Posted: 14 September 2026
A Methodology for the Direct Quantitative Determination of Aluminum and Ascorbate-Reducible Ferrozine-Reactive Iron in Emulsions
Georgia Eleni Tsotsou
,Dimitra Dremetsika
,Georgia Bakara
,Mirofora Pilakouta
Posted: 04 September 2026
Subtype-Specific Aptamer Technologies for Breast Cancer: From Molecular Recognition to Precision Applications
Hui-Bin Wu
,Zhi Zeng
,Wen-Yi Huang
,Xin-Yan Lin
,Rui Tian
,Jian-Min Chen
,Qiu-Long Zhang
Posted: 04 September 2026
From Screening to Generative Design: Advances in ML-Assisted MOFs for Carbon Capture
Muhammad Bilal
,Faisal Latif
,Muhammad Hasnain
,Muhammad Ali
,Mahnoor Saeed
,Raziya Nadeem
The ongoing climate crisis, caused by the annual release of 37 billion metric tons of CO2 emissions, is putting pressure on the advancement of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) and Direct Air Capture (DAC) technologies. Metal–Organic Frameworks (MOFs), with their high surface areas and modular pore topologies, present a very attractive class of sorbents for CO2 capture; however, it currently remains computationally prohibitive to explore their extensive chemical design space. Herein, we provide a thorough evaluation of how machine learning (ML) (as an emerging technology) has played an increasing role in furthering our understanding of CO2 capture from MOFs. Through an organized investigation, we provide evaluations of the latest generation of models across four key areas: application at a process level, mechanistic interpretable modelling; physically relevant descriptors, and predictive performance metrics. Recent work with Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials (MLPs) shows that traditional assumptions about rigid frameworks are being challenged by the fact that diffusion properties and adsorption thermodynamics are heavily influenced by the flexibility of the framework. The use of physics-informed descriptor engineering yields R2 values of 0.81-0.97 across gas species and pressure regimes, while the generative nature of Deep Reinforcement Learning and transformer-based architectures has been shown to allow for the inverse design of frameworks with high affinities for gas species. The trend in this sector is moving towards optimization of multiple scales simultaneously and integrating processes to achieve an optimized property prediction. Current work with machine learning is focusing on using a combination of material properties and operational indicators (such as how much gas is recovered through pressure swing adsorption) to make predictions. As these techniques improve, there will be a similar need for a design that is both physically informed and understandable, thus allowing for a link between molecular discoveries and water-stable materials that have been experimentally verified and are suitable for use in commercial applications.
The ongoing climate crisis, caused by the annual release of 37 billion metric tons of CO2 emissions, is putting pressure on the advancement of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) and Direct Air Capture (DAC) technologies. Metal–Organic Frameworks (MOFs), with their high surface areas and modular pore topologies, present a very attractive class of sorbents for CO2 capture; however, it currently remains computationally prohibitive to explore their extensive chemical design space. Herein, we provide a thorough evaluation of how machine learning (ML) (as an emerging technology) has played an increasing role in furthering our understanding of CO2 capture from MOFs. Through an organized investigation, we provide evaluations of the latest generation of models across four key areas: application at a process level, mechanistic interpretable modelling; physically relevant descriptors, and predictive performance metrics. Recent work with Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials (MLPs) shows that traditional assumptions about rigid frameworks are being challenged by the fact that diffusion properties and adsorption thermodynamics are heavily influenced by the flexibility of the framework. The use of physics-informed descriptor engineering yields R2 values of 0.81-0.97 across gas species and pressure regimes, while the generative nature of Deep Reinforcement Learning and transformer-based architectures has been shown to allow for the inverse design of frameworks with high affinities for gas species. The trend in this sector is moving towards optimization of multiple scales simultaneously and integrating processes to achieve an optimized property prediction. Current work with machine learning is focusing on using a combination of material properties and operational indicators (such as how much gas is recovered through pressure swing adsorption) to make predictions. As these techniques improve, there will be a similar need for a design that is both physically informed and understandable, thus allowing for a link between molecular discoveries and water-stable materials that have been experimentally verified and are suitable for use in commercial applications.
Posted: 31 August 2026
Vanadium Pentoxide–Mediated Oxidation Coupled with HPLC-MS/MS for Broad-Spectrum Screening of Paralytic Shellfish Toxins in Plasma
Yangde Ma
,Huilan Yu
,Xiujie Liu
,Bo Chen
,Longhui Liang
,Shilei Liu
Posted: 25 August 2026
Portable Mass Spectrometry for In-Field Real/Time Water Pollution Monitoring: Validation and Pilot Study in Danube-Tisa-Danube Irrigation System
Djordje Vujić
,Milena Aleksić
,Daria Ilić
,Boris Brkić
Posted: 18 August 2026
Optimization and Validation of the QuEChERS-GC-MS Method for the Analysis of Dieldrin in Fillets of Nile Tilapia Oreochromis niloticus
Sérgio Williams Ferreira de Sousa
,Luis Felipe Lima Guimarães
,Tatiana Sainara Maia Fernandes
,Joaquim Rodrigues de Vasconcelos Neto
,Deboha Viegas A. de A. dos Santos
,Ronaldo Ferreira do Nascimento
,Daniel Barbosa Alcântara
Organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) residues act as critical drivers of environmental impacts and pose significant risks to human and animal health. This scenario is further exacerbated by their high environmental persistence, marked bioaccumulative potential, and chronic toxicity. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies dieldrin as well as aldrin, when metabolized into this substance, as probably carcinogenic to humans (Group 2A). OCPs can accumulate in the fatty tissue of fish. Therefore, when consumed, fish can become a route of human exposure to OCPs, such as dieldrin. A novel method for determining dieldrin in Fillets of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) using GC/MS and the original QuEChERS was developed and validated. The optimization of chromatographic parameters resulted in an appropriate retention time (Rt) for dieldrin. Matrix-matched calibration was established to correct the matrix effect (ME) in the quantitative analysis of the pesticide. Dieldrin showed matrix-induced signal suppression of -21.17%. The pesticide studied showed good linearity with a coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.9918. According to the analytical validation standards established by ANVISA, concentrations above the LOQ (50 μg L-1) can be used as a linear working range with high reliability.
Organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) residues act as critical drivers of environmental impacts and pose significant risks to human and animal health. This scenario is further exacerbated by their high environmental persistence, marked bioaccumulative potential, and chronic toxicity. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies dieldrin as well as aldrin, when metabolized into this substance, as probably carcinogenic to humans (Group 2A). OCPs can accumulate in the fatty tissue of fish. Therefore, when consumed, fish can become a route of human exposure to OCPs, such as dieldrin. A novel method for determining dieldrin in Fillets of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) using GC/MS and the original QuEChERS was developed and validated. The optimization of chromatographic parameters resulted in an appropriate retention time (Rt) for dieldrin. Matrix-matched calibration was established to correct the matrix effect (ME) in the quantitative analysis of the pesticide. Dieldrin showed matrix-induced signal suppression of -21.17%. The pesticide studied showed good linearity with a coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.9918. According to the analytical validation standards established by ANVISA, concentrations above the LOQ (50 μg L-1) can be used as a linear working range with high reliability.
Posted: 18 August 2026
of 41