Sort by
Two Cases Report of Successful Treatment of Refractory Mac Pulmonary Disease in Two Different Elderly Patients Using a Regimen Using a Drug with an Innovative Drug Delivery System, Liposomal Amikacin (ALIS), at Half the Standard Dose
Kenjiro Nagai
,Syo Nagai
Posted: 15 December 2025
Robotic-Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Resection in Oncologic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (2025)
Hussein Mussa Muafa
,Malika Abdu Balkam
Background: Robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) is increasingly used for colorectal cancer (CRC), but its clinical and oncologic advantages over conventional laparoscopy (LS) remain uncertain. Prior meta-analyses have included overlapping RCTs but vary in methodology, scope, and analytical transparency. This review aims to provide an updated, independently re-analyzed synthesis of RCTs published from 2015–2025, with full PRISMA compliance, explicit analytic reproducibility, and expanded evaluation of bias and evidence certainty. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. The protocol was retrospectively registered in PROSPERO (Registration ID: CRD420251237158). PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched (January 1, 2015–January 31, 2025). Full reproducible search strings, PICOS criteria, and inclusion/exclusion rules were predefined. Only RCTs comparing RAS vs LS for malignant colorectal disease were included. Data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers. Meta-analyses used DerSimonian–Laird random-effects models; standardized procedures were applied for converting medians/IQRs into means/SDs and for continuity corrections in zero-event trials. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane RoB 2.0, and evidence certainty was graded using GRADE. Results: A total of 12 RCTs encompassing 3,107 patients met the inclusion criteria. RAS resulted in significantly lower conversion-to-open rates (OR 0.42; 95% CI 0.28–0.63; I²=18%) compared with LS. Operative time was consistently longer with RAS (MD +23.8 minutes; 95% CI 14.2–33.4; I²=67%). Overall postoperative complications (Clavien–Dindo ≥II) were comparable (OR 0.91; 95% CI 0.76–1.13; I²=22%). Length of stay showed a small but significant reduction with RAS (MD −0.8 days; 95% CI −1.3 to −0.2; I²=49%). Pathologic outcomes showed lower circumferential resection margin (CRM) positivity with RAS (OR 0.59; 95% CI 0.41–0.85). Lymph node retrieval was slightly higher with RAS (MD +0.71 nodes; 95% CI 0.25–1.18). Distal margins and TME completeness were equivalent. No RCT reported mature long-term oncologic outcomes; evidence remains limited to short-term surrogates. Conclusions: In contemporary RCTs, RAS provides fewer conversions and slightly better pathologic surrogates, while maintaining similar morbidity compared to LS. The main trade-off remains longer operative time and higher resource use. True oncologic equivalence cannot be confirmed until long-term RCT data mature. Advanced imaging (e.g., SOMATOM Force CT), age-specific MIS evidence, and the emergence of endoluminal robotic systems are likely to shape future refinements in technique and patient selection.
Background: Robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) is increasingly used for colorectal cancer (CRC), but its clinical and oncologic advantages over conventional laparoscopy (LS) remain uncertain. Prior meta-analyses have included overlapping RCTs but vary in methodology, scope, and analytical transparency. This review aims to provide an updated, independently re-analyzed synthesis of RCTs published from 2015–2025, with full PRISMA compliance, explicit analytic reproducibility, and expanded evaluation of bias and evidence certainty. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. The protocol was retrospectively registered in PROSPERO (Registration ID: CRD420251237158). PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched (January 1, 2015–January 31, 2025). Full reproducible search strings, PICOS criteria, and inclusion/exclusion rules were predefined. Only RCTs comparing RAS vs LS for malignant colorectal disease were included. Data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers. Meta-analyses used DerSimonian–Laird random-effects models; standardized procedures were applied for converting medians/IQRs into means/SDs and for continuity corrections in zero-event trials. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane RoB 2.0, and evidence certainty was graded using GRADE. Results: A total of 12 RCTs encompassing 3,107 patients met the inclusion criteria. RAS resulted in significantly lower conversion-to-open rates (OR 0.42; 95% CI 0.28–0.63; I²=18%) compared with LS. Operative time was consistently longer with RAS (MD +23.8 minutes; 95% CI 14.2–33.4; I²=67%). Overall postoperative complications (Clavien–Dindo ≥II) were comparable (OR 0.91; 95% CI 0.76–1.13; I²=22%). Length of stay showed a small but significant reduction with RAS (MD −0.8 days; 95% CI −1.3 to −0.2; I²=49%). Pathologic outcomes showed lower circumferential resection margin (CRM) positivity with RAS (OR 0.59; 95% CI 0.41–0.85). Lymph node retrieval was slightly higher with RAS (MD +0.71 nodes; 95% CI 0.25–1.18). Distal margins and TME completeness were equivalent. No RCT reported mature long-term oncologic outcomes; evidence remains limited to short-term surrogates. Conclusions: In contemporary RCTs, RAS provides fewer conversions and slightly better pathologic surrogates, while maintaining similar morbidity compared to LS. The main trade-off remains longer operative time and higher resource use. True oncologic equivalence cannot be confirmed until long-term RCT data mature. Advanced imaging (e.g., SOMATOM Force CT), age-specific MIS evidence, and the emergence of endoluminal robotic systems are likely to shape future refinements in technique and patient selection.
Posted: 12 December 2025
Molecular, Metabolic and Inflammatory Patterns Involved in Pathogenesis of Anderson-Fabry Disease
Irene Simonetta
,Irene Baglio
,Antonino Tuttolomondo
Posted: 09 December 2025
Silent Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Presenting with Acute Cough, and Poor Response to Antitussives: A Case Report
Hussein Mussa Muafa
Posted: 09 December 2025
Changes in Insulin Resistance with Different Weight Loss Methods in Patients with Type Two Diabetes Mellitus and Hypertension: A Comparative Clinical Trial
Kuat Oshakbayev
,Aigul Durmanova
,Gani Kuttymuratov
,Nurzhan Bikhanov
,Altay Nabiyev
,Timur Suleimenov
,Alisher Idrisov
,Tomiris Shakhmarova
,Zhanel Mirmanova
,Saule Rakhimova
+2 authors
Posted: 08 December 2025
Diabetic Kidney Disease Associated with Chronic Exposure to Low Doses of Environmental Cadmium
Soisungwan Satarug
,Tanaporn Khamphaya
,Donrawee Waeyeng
,David A. Vesey
,Supabhorn Yimthiang
Posted: 27 November 2025
Restrictive vs Liberal Fluid Strategy for Initial Resuscitation in Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2025)
Hussein Mussa Muafa
,Malika Abdu Balkam
Background: Fluid resuscitation is a cornerstone in the management of sepsis and septic shock, yet the optimal strategy remains controversial. Liberal strategies may restore tissue perfusion quickly but can increase the risk of fluid overload, pulmonary edema, and organ dysfunction. Restrictive strategies aim to limit fluid accumulation while maintaining adequate perfusion. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to synthesize randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing restrictive versus liberal fluid strategies in adults with sepsis or septic shock, focusing on mortality, ICU outcomes, renal outcomes, and fluid balance. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library up to October 2025. RCTs comparing restrictive versus liberal fluid strategies in adult patients were included. Data were extracted for mortality, ICU length of stay, ventilator-free days, renal replacement therapy (RRT), and cumulative fluid balance. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane RoB 2, and evidence certainty using GRADE. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models. Results: Twelve RCTs comprising 8,743 patients were included. Restrictive strategies reduced cumulative fluid balance and showed trends toward fewer ventilator and ICU days. Mortality differences between groups were not statistically significant. Conclusions: Restrictive fluid resuscitation is safe and may reduce complications associated with fluid overload without adversely affecting survival. Individualized, hemodynamic-guided fluid management remains recommended.
Background: Fluid resuscitation is a cornerstone in the management of sepsis and septic shock, yet the optimal strategy remains controversial. Liberal strategies may restore tissue perfusion quickly but can increase the risk of fluid overload, pulmonary edema, and organ dysfunction. Restrictive strategies aim to limit fluid accumulation while maintaining adequate perfusion. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to synthesize randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing restrictive versus liberal fluid strategies in adults with sepsis or septic shock, focusing on mortality, ICU outcomes, renal outcomes, and fluid balance. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library up to October 2025. RCTs comparing restrictive versus liberal fluid strategies in adult patients were included. Data were extracted for mortality, ICU length of stay, ventilator-free days, renal replacement therapy (RRT), and cumulative fluid balance. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane RoB 2, and evidence certainty using GRADE. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models. Results: Twelve RCTs comprising 8,743 patients were included. Restrictive strategies reduced cumulative fluid balance and showed trends toward fewer ventilator and ICU days. Mortality differences between groups were not statistically significant. Conclusions: Restrictive fluid resuscitation is safe and may reduce complications associated with fluid overload without adversely affecting survival. Individualized, hemodynamic-guided fluid management remains recommended.
Posted: 11 November 2025
Machine Learning–Based Prediction of Ultrasound-Detected Metabolic Dysfunction–Associated Steatotic Liver Disease Using Routine Clinical and Biochemical Parameters
Canan Akkus
,Gamze Sonmez
,Ali Şahin
,Melis Gokgoz
,Feride Caglar
,Sanem Kayhan
Background/Objectives: Metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is now the leading cause of chronic liver disease globally, mirroring the increasing prevalence of obesity, insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes. Early detection of hepatic steatosis is vital for cardiometabolic risk assessment; however, conventional imaging is costly and impractical for population screening. This study aimed to develop interpretable machine-learning models to predict ultrasound-detected MASLD using routinely available clinical and biochemical data. Methods: We analyzed data from 644 adults (50% with MASLD on ultrasonography). Preprocessing, imputation, and feature selection were implemented within a single scikit-learn pipeline to avoid information leakage. An Elastic Net–regularized logistic regression identified the top 20 predictors, which were subsequently used across nine supervised machine learning (ML) classifiers. Model performance was evaluated via repeated stratified 5-fold cross-validation (25 resamples) using accuracy, F1 score, sensitivity, specificity, Youden’s J, balanced accuracy, and Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC). Interpretability was assessed using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Results: Participants with MASLD exhibited greater adiposity, insulin resistance, and dyslipidemia compared with controls [p < 0.05 for body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, glucose, HbA1c, triglycerides). Elastic Net selection highlighted Weight, Ponderal Index, Fibrosis-4 Index (FIB-4), blood urea nitrogen (BUN)/Creatinine ratio, Aspartate Aminotransferase to Platelet Ratio Index (APRI), and Visceral Adiposity Index as the strongest predictors. Logistic Regression and Gradient Boosting achieved the best performance (accuracy = 0.65 ± 0.03; AUROC = 0.71 ± 0.04; balanced accuracy = 0.66 ± 0.06), outperforming rule-based indices such as Fatty Liver Index (FLI) and Hepatic Steatosis Index (HSI) reported in the literature. SHAP analysis confirmed clinically coherent feature effects, with higher anthropometric and hepatic injury indices increasing predicted MASLD probability. Conclusions: Routinely available clinical and biochemical parameters can predict hepatic steatosis with moderate accuracy using transparent, interpretable ML models. Logistic Regression and Gradient Boosting provided the best discrimination and generalizability, offering a pragmatic, low-cost approach for early MASLD screening in primary and metabolic care settings.
Background/Objectives: Metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is now the leading cause of chronic liver disease globally, mirroring the increasing prevalence of obesity, insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes. Early detection of hepatic steatosis is vital for cardiometabolic risk assessment; however, conventional imaging is costly and impractical for population screening. This study aimed to develop interpretable machine-learning models to predict ultrasound-detected MASLD using routinely available clinical and biochemical data. Methods: We analyzed data from 644 adults (50% with MASLD on ultrasonography). Preprocessing, imputation, and feature selection were implemented within a single scikit-learn pipeline to avoid information leakage. An Elastic Net–regularized logistic regression identified the top 20 predictors, which were subsequently used across nine supervised machine learning (ML) classifiers. Model performance was evaluated via repeated stratified 5-fold cross-validation (25 resamples) using accuracy, F1 score, sensitivity, specificity, Youden’s J, balanced accuracy, and Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC). Interpretability was assessed using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Results: Participants with MASLD exhibited greater adiposity, insulin resistance, and dyslipidemia compared with controls [p < 0.05 for body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, glucose, HbA1c, triglycerides). Elastic Net selection highlighted Weight, Ponderal Index, Fibrosis-4 Index (FIB-4), blood urea nitrogen (BUN)/Creatinine ratio, Aspartate Aminotransferase to Platelet Ratio Index (APRI), and Visceral Adiposity Index as the strongest predictors. Logistic Regression and Gradient Boosting achieved the best performance (accuracy = 0.65 ± 0.03; AUROC = 0.71 ± 0.04; balanced accuracy = 0.66 ± 0.06), outperforming rule-based indices such as Fatty Liver Index (FLI) and Hepatic Steatosis Index (HSI) reported in the literature. SHAP analysis confirmed clinically coherent feature effects, with higher anthropometric and hepatic injury indices increasing predicted MASLD probability. Conclusions: Routinely available clinical and biochemical parameters can predict hepatic steatosis with moderate accuracy using transparent, interpretable ML models. Logistic Regression and Gradient Boosting provided the best discrimination and generalizability, offering a pragmatic, low-cost approach for early MASLD screening in primary and metabolic care settings.
Posted: 10 November 2025
Dialysis and Acid–Base Balance: A Comparative Physiological Analysis of Boston and Stewart Models
Nikolaos Kroustalakis
,Eleftheria Maragkaki
,Ariadni Androvitsanea
,Ioannis Petrakis
,Eleni Drosataki
,Kleio Dermitzaki
,Christos Pleros
,Andreas Antonakis
,Dimitra Lygerou
,Eumorfia Kondili
+2 authors
Posted: 30 October 2025
Impact of Updated 2024 Diagnostic Criteria on Early Detection of Small-Duct PSC in Ulcerative Colitis Patients: A Clinical Mini-Review Focusing on Japanese Studies
Mohammadjavad Sotoudeheian
Posted: 24 October 2025
Paclitaxel-Induced Collagenous Colitis: A Case Report in Male Breast Cancer
Shuhei Suzuki
,Hidekazu Horiuchi
,Takanobu Kabasawa
,Takashi Oizumi
,Yuka Kobayashi
Posted: 17 October 2025
Systemic Sclerosis-Associated ILD: Insights and Limitations of ScleroID
Cristina Elena Niță
,Laura Maria Groseanu
Posted: 15 October 2025
Proposed Clinical Guidelines for Abdominal and Pleural Paracentesis with Emphasis on Large-Volume Paracentesis
Bartal Carmi
,Sikuler Emanuel
,Tsenter Philip
,Persky Vitaly
,Valery Dvorkin
,Roman Pairous
,Doron Schwartz
Posted: 13 October 2025
Environmental Exposure to Cadmium and Lead Exacerbates Kidney Function in People with Diabetes
Soisungwan Satarug
,David Alan Vesey
,Tanaporn Khamphaya
,Donrawee Waeyeng
,Supabhorn Yimthiang
Posted: 08 October 2025
Acute Viral-Induced Myopathy Following COVID-19: A Case Report
Ragda A. Kahiyah
,Aymen Alkarawi
Posted: 26 September 2025
The Albumin-Bilirubin Grade and Cognitive Function in Liver Cirrhosis; Animal Naming Test and Non-Invasive Liver Biomarkers
Fatemeh Sotoudeheian
,Mohammadjavad Sotoudeheian
,Hamidreza Pazoki Toroudi
,Reza Azarbad
Background: Cognitive impairment is a frequent complication of cirrhosis, and its relationship with hepatic functional reserve remains incompletely understood. The Albumin-Bilirubin (ALBI) score provides an objective measure of liver dysfunction, but its association with cognitive outcomes in cirrhosis requires clarification. Methods: This retrospective secondary analysis utilized a publicly available cohort of 268 patients with cirrhosis. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory parameters were extracted, including ALBI, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD), and Child-Pugh classification. Cognitive function was measured with the Animal Naming Test (ANT), with scores <20 indicating impairment. Associations between ALBI and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Results: The mean age was 59.1±10.6 years, 58.6% were male, and 47.4% exhibited cognitive impairment. ALBI correlated significantly with MELD (ρ=0.67, p<0.0001), Child-Pugh class (ρ=0.60, p<0.0001), history of ascites (ρ=0.40, p<0.0001), and minimal hepatic encephalopathy (ρ=0.16, p=0.007), but not with ANT performance. Linear regression showed no significant association between ALBI and ANT scores (β=−0.48, p=0.374). Logistic regression confirmed minimal hepatic encephalopathy (OR=4.46, 95% CI:2.39–8.56, p<0.0001) and lower education (OR=0.82, 95% CI:0.69–0.97, p=0.022) as independent predictors of cognitive impairment, whereas ALBI was not significant in any model. Model performance improved with additional covariates. Conclusion: While the ALBI score correlated with established indices of liver disease severity, it was not independently associated with cognitive impairment. Instead, minimal hepatic encephalopathy and lower education emerged as the strongest predictors. These findings suggest that cognitive decline in cirrhosis may be more strongly driven by neurocognitive and socioeconomic factors than by hepatic synthetic reserve alone.
Background: Cognitive impairment is a frequent complication of cirrhosis, and its relationship with hepatic functional reserve remains incompletely understood. The Albumin-Bilirubin (ALBI) score provides an objective measure of liver dysfunction, but its association with cognitive outcomes in cirrhosis requires clarification. Methods: This retrospective secondary analysis utilized a publicly available cohort of 268 patients with cirrhosis. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory parameters were extracted, including ALBI, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD), and Child-Pugh classification. Cognitive function was measured with the Animal Naming Test (ANT), with scores <20 indicating impairment. Associations between ALBI and clinical outcomes were evaluated. Results: The mean age was 59.1±10.6 years, 58.6% were male, and 47.4% exhibited cognitive impairment. ALBI correlated significantly with MELD (ρ=0.67, p<0.0001), Child-Pugh class (ρ=0.60, p<0.0001), history of ascites (ρ=0.40, p<0.0001), and minimal hepatic encephalopathy (ρ=0.16, p=0.007), but not with ANT performance. Linear regression showed no significant association between ALBI and ANT scores (β=−0.48, p=0.374). Logistic regression confirmed minimal hepatic encephalopathy (OR=4.46, 95% CI:2.39–8.56, p<0.0001) and lower education (OR=0.82, 95% CI:0.69–0.97, p=0.022) as independent predictors of cognitive impairment, whereas ALBI was not significant in any model. Model performance improved with additional covariates. Conclusion: While the ALBI score correlated with established indices of liver disease severity, it was not independently associated with cognitive impairment. Instead, minimal hepatic encephalopathy and lower education emerged as the strongest predictors. These findings suggest that cognitive decline in cirrhosis may be more strongly driven by neurocognitive and socioeconomic factors than by hepatic synthetic reserve alone.
Posted: 25 September 2025
Evaluating the Postoperative Timing of Rifampicin Introduction Linked to the Clinical and Microbiological Outcomes of Orthopedic Staphylococcal Implant Infections
Valeria Dessert
,Steven M Maurer
,Marc S Maurer
,David Albrecht
,Mazda Farshad
,İlker Uçkay
Posted: 23 September 2025
When Fever Strikes Twice: A Case Report of Streptococcus pneumoniae Myelitis with Delayed-Onset Reactive Arthritis
Rosario Luca Norrito
,Sergio Mastrilli
,Felice Fiorello
,Giuseppe Taormina
,Lucia Di Giorgi
,Grazia Mery Anna Ruggirello
,Carlo Domenico Maida
,Aurelio Piazza
,Fabio Cartabellotta
Posted: 19 September 2025
Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 in Patients with Rheumatic Diseases on Hydroxychloroquine, Compared with the Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 in Controls on a Prophylactic Dose of Hydroxychloroquine
Mikel Jordhani
,Dorina Ruci
,Petraq Jordhani
,Tritan Kalo
Background: Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug used in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and other autoimmune diseases. Although HCQ reduces SARS-CoV-2 replication in vitro at high doses, its prophylactic role in COVID-19 remains unproven. This study evaluated SARS-CoV-2 incidence in patients with rheumatic diseases on therapeutic HCQ versus healthy controls taking HCQ prophylactically. Materials and Methods: In this prospective case-control study, 145 patients with autoimmune diseases (RA, SLE, Sjogren’s syndrome, MCTD) taking HCQ (200–400 mg/day) were compared with 77 healthy volunteers on prophylactic HCQ (400 mg/week). Participants underwent SARS-CoV-2 PCR and serology testing over one year (Feb 2020–Mar 2021). Results: SARS-CoV-2 positivity was observed in 24/145 (16.6%) patients versus 4/77 (5.2%) controls (χ² = 4.90, p = 0.027; Fisher’s exact p = 0.018; OR ≈ 3.62). All positive cases in both groups experienced mild disease without hospitalization. Conclusions: Therapeutic HCQ in patients with autoimmune diseases did not prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection as effectively as low-dose prophylactic HCQ in healthy controls. Nevertheless, disease severity was mild in all cases, supporting the overall safety of HCQ. Larger, randomized studies are needed to clarify HCQ’s prophylactic potential.
Background: Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug used in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and other autoimmune diseases. Although HCQ reduces SARS-CoV-2 replication in vitro at high doses, its prophylactic role in COVID-19 remains unproven. This study evaluated SARS-CoV-2 incidence in patients with rheumatic diseases on therapeutic HCQ versus healthy controls taking HCQ prophylactically. Materials and Methods: In this prospective case-control study, 145 patients with autoimmune diseases (RA, SLE, Sjogren’s syndrome, MCTD) taking HCQ (200–400 mg/day) were compared with 77 healthy volunteers on prophylactic HCQ (400 mg/week). Participants underwent SARS-CoV-2 PCR and serology testing over one year (Feb 2020–Mar 2021). Results: SARS-CoV-2 positivity was observed in 24/145 (16.6%) patients versus 4/77 (5.2%) controls (χ² = 4.90, p = 0.027; Fisher’s exact p = 0.018; OR ≈ 3.62). All positive cases in both groups experienced mild disease without hospitalization. Conclusions: Therapeutic HCQ in patients with autoimmune diseases did not prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection as effectively as low-dose prophylactic HCQ in healthy controls. Nevertheless, disease severity was mild in all cases, supporting the overall safety of HCQ. Larger, randomized studies are needed to clarify HCQ’s prophylactic potential.
Posted: 19 September 2025
Concealed Subclavian Steal Syndrome: The Story of Labile Hypertension and Omarthrosis
Martina Slováčiková
,Štefánia Moricová
,Lucia Kukučková
,Katarína Dostálová
,Peter Petráško
,Diana Ponošová
,Peter Mikula
,Katarína Gazdíková
Posted: 15 September 2025
of 12