Sort by
Drone‐Induced Midfacial Blast Injuries: Early Reconstruction and 5‐Year Outcomes from a Single‐Center Cohort
Anna Poghosyan
,Martin Misakyan
,Gurgen Mkhitaryan
,Davit Minasyan
,Irina Malkhasyan
,Hayk Petrosyan
,Anna Frangulyan
,Aren Bablumyan
,Armen Minasyan
,Armen Muradyan
Posted: 09 May 2026
Technology-Enhanced Training for Prehospital Mass-Casualty Incident Preparedness: A Scoping Review
Ameline Saouli
,Ali AlRahma
,Hadeel Farhan
,Abu Omayer
,Radwa Nour
,Azza Yousif
,Ives Hubloue
,Nabil Zary
Posted: 01 May 2026
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Primary Care Referral Patterns and Resource Utilization in a Hospital Emergency Department: A Comparative Pre- and Post-Pandemic Study
Angel Iván Díaz-Salado
,Francisco Javier García-Sánchez
,Alicia Fuente-Gaforio
,Andrés Estropá-Zapater
,Irene Pérez-Arévalo
,Sandra Moreno-Ruiz
,María Teresa Sánchez-Álvarez
,Natalia Mudarra-García
Posted: 28 April 2026
Preservation of Basic Life Support Competencies Among Certified First Responders
Igor Goričan
,Andrej Šorgo
,Matej Strnad
Posted: 13 April 2026
Assessment of the Microcirculation During Extracorporeal Blood Purification in Septic Patients: A Narrative Review
Darja Smirnova
,Mara Klibus
,Olegs Sabelnikovs
Posted: 08 April 2026
Clinical Implications of the Lazarus Phenomenon: Full Recovery After Declared Death in Patients Aged 60+ Based on the over 40 Years Analysis
Małgorzata Grześkowiak
,Anna Kluzik
,Piotr Rzeźniczek
,Agnieszka Danuta Gaczkowska
Posted: 23 March 2026
Non-Invasive Respiratory Support in “De Novo” Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: Wich Technique Is Best?
Paolo Groff
,Stefano De Vuono
Posted: 23 March 2026
Cardiac Arrests of Non-Cardiac Origin in Slovenia: What Has Changed in 2022/2023 as Compared to 2010/2011?
Ema Kocjancic
,Anja Jazbec
,Spela Tadel Kocjancic
Background: Cardiac arrest is the third leading cause of natural death in Europe and thus presents a growing burden on both our society and healthcare system. There has been very little research done on cardiac arrests of non-cardiac origin despite their increasing incidence, as they represent a heterogenous group of patients in which the type and outcome of treatment vary depending on the underlying cause of the cardiac arrest. Aim: The aim of our study is to research how the Slovenian healthcare system has worked and currently works in the field of cardiac arrests of non-cardiac origin. Methods: Our study was descriptive and retrospective. We compared 2 time periods, 2010/2011 and 2022/2023. Our sample included all patients admitted to Centre for Intensive Internal Medicine (CIIM) during these periods after either out-of-hospital or in-hospital cardiac arrest of non-cardiac origin. Results: The incidence of all cardiac arrests of non-cardiac origin was higher in 2022/2023 (Hi-squared test, p=0.021), while the incidence of those that occured in-hospital was lower in 2022/2023 (Hi-squared test, p=0.007). The number of male patients was higher in the second period (Hi-squared test, p=0.013). The age of the patients did not differ significantly between the two periods (Student's t-test, p>0.05). ICU stay was longer in the second period (Mann Whitney U test, p=0.027). The number of tests performed was higher and treatment was more aggressive in the second period than in the first period. Patient survival was higher in the second period in the in-hospital cardiac arrest of non-cardiac origin group (Student's t-test, p=0.048). Conclusion: The incidence of cardiac arrest of non-cardiac origin in Slovenia has been increasing through the years. Better hospital treatment results in better overall survival and a lower incidence of in-hospital cardiac arrests. More patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrests are nowadays being resuscitated by lay bystanders in the field, so patients' survival to hospital admission is higher. The proportion of male patients is increasing, age is not changing significantly. Despite better diagnosis processes, new treatments and improved knowledge, the survival and neurological outcome of patients have not improved significantly.
Background: Cardiac arrest is the third leading cause of natural death in Europe and thus presents a growing burden on both our society and healthcare system. There has been very little research done on cardiac arrests of non-cardiac origin despite their increasing incidence, as they represent a heterogenous group of patients in which the type and outcome of treatment vary depending on the underlying cause of the cardiac arrest. Aim: The aim of our study is to research how the Slovenian healthcare system has worked and currently works in the field of cardiac arrests of non-cardiac origin. Methods: Our study was descriptive and retrospective. We compared 2 time periods, 2010/2011 and 2022/2023. Our sample included all patients admitted to Centre for Intensive Internal Medicine (CIIM) during these periods after either out-of-hospital or in-hospital cardiac arrest of non-cardiac origin. Results: The incidence of all cardiac arrests of non-cardiac origin was higher in 2022/2023 (Hi-squared test, p=0.021), while the incidence of those that occured in-hospital was lower in 2022/2023 (Hi-squared test, p=0.007). The number of male patients was higher in the second period (Hi-squared test, p=0.013). The age of the patients did not differ significantly between the two periods (Student's t-test, p>0.05). ICU stay was longer in the second period (Mann Whitney U test, p=0.027). The number of tests performed was higher and treatment was more aggressive in the second period than in the first period. Patient survival was higher in the second period in the in-hospital cardiac arrest of non-cardiac origin group (Student's t-test, p=0.048). Conclusion: The incidence of cardiac arrest of non-cardiac origin in Slovenia has been increasing through the years. Better hospital treatment results in better overall survival and a lower incidence of in-hospital cardiac arrests. More patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrests are nowadays being resuscitated by lay bystanders in the field, so patients' survival to hospital admission is higher. The proportion of male patients is increasing, age is not changing significantly. Despite better diagnosis processes, new treatments and improved knowledge, the survival and neurological outcome of patients have not improved significantly.
Posted: 17 March 2026
Wild-Boar–Related Injuries in Wilderness Environments: Evidence Review, Field-Oriented Management Principles and Clinical Recommendations
Markus Maier
,Leonard P. N. Maier
,Simon Hackl
,Christoph Schmitz
,Nicola Maffulli
Posted: 02 March 2026
Erythroderma in the Emergency Department: A Narrative Review
Husna Moola
,Willem Izak Visser
Posted: 27 February 2026
EEG in the Emergency Department: When the Neurophysiological Test Cannot Be Considered in the Patient’s Emergency Diagnostic Workup? The EMINENCE Study
Maenia Scarpino
,Antonello Grippo
,Federica Barraco
,Benedetta Piccardi
,Laura Betti
,Peimann Nazerian
,Arianna Fabbri
,Roberto Fratangelo
,Cristina Mei
,Andrea Nencioni
Posted: 03 February 2026
Combined Glucose and Thiamine Treatment for Sepsis
Patrick Bradley
Posted: 30 January 2026
Physiological Phenotypes of Sepsis Reveal a Normotensive High-Risk “Cryptic Shock” State: An Unsupervised Machine Learning Analysis of a Multicentre ICU Cohort and External Validation in Mimic-IV
Physiological Phenotypes of Sepsis Reveal a Normotensive High-Risk “Cryptic Shock” State: An Unsupervised Machine Learning Analysis of a Multicentre ICU Cohort and External Validation in Mimic-IV
Ibrahim Ibrahim Shuaibu
,Mustapha Isa Ahmad
,Omer Abdulhameed Alani
,Joseph Okonkon Effiong
,Muhammad Ayan Khan
,Diyaa Alkhamis
,Anas Alkhamis
Posted: 20 January 2026
Reducing Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Usage as Interfacility Transport for Patients Presenting with Chest Pain
Mark K. Hewitt
,Alisha Greer
,Shawn Mondoux
Posted: 19 January 2026
Prospective Multicenter External Validation of the BIDIAP Index for the Diagnosis of Pediatric Acute Appendicitis
Javier Arredondo Montero
,Andrea Herreras Martínez
,Luis Rello Varas
,Alicia Escudero Villafañe
,Marina Iglesias Oricheta
,Maria del Mar Larrea Ortiz-Quintana
,Lucía Fernández Rodríguez
,Pablo Aguado Roncero
,Maria Carmen Campos Calleja
,Ricardo Díez
+4 authors
Introduction: Pediatric acute appendicitis (PAA) remains challenging to diagnose despite existing diagnostic scores. The BIDIAP index is a three-item diagnostic tool with very high discriminative performance in a derivation cohort. This study aimed to prospectively and externally validate the BIDIAP index in a multicenter pediatric population.Material and Methods: We conducted a prospective, multicenter observational study across four tertiary pediatric centers, enrolling children presenting with suspected PAA. Two groups were analyzed: patients with histopathologically confirmed PAA and patients in whom appendicitis was confidently excluded after diagnostic work-up, classified as non-surgical abdominal pain (NSAP). The BIDIAP index was applied using a predefined cutoff (≥ 4 points), and diagnostic performance was assessed using ROC analysis, calibration metrics, and decision curve analysis (DCA).Results: A total of 644 patients meeting the prespecified analytical criteria were included in the primary analysis. The BIDIAP index demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.92–0.95). The calibration slope was 1.00, and the intercept was close to zero, indicating close agreement between predicted and observed risks. At the prespecified cutoff value of ≥ 4 points, the BIDIAP index achieved a sensitivity of 90.5% and a specificity of 81.6%. DCA showed a positive net clinical benefit of the BIDIAP index over treat-all and treat-none strategies across the full range of clinically relevant threshold probabilities. Conclusions: The BIDIAP index demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance for PAA. Its simplicity, based on only three items, and its potential applicability even when the appendix is not visualized on ultrasonography make the BIDIAP index a promising tool for supporting clinical decision-making in routine pediatric emergency practice.
Introduction: Pediatric acute appendicitis (PAA) remains challenging to diagnose despite existing diagnostic scores. The BIDIAP index is a three-item diagnostic tool with very high discriminative performance in a derivation cohort. This study aimed to prospectively and externally validate the BIDIAP index in a multicenter pediatric population.Material and Methods: We conducted a prospective, multicenter observational study across four tertiary pediatric centers, enrolling children presenting with suspected PAA. Two groups were analyzed: patients with histopathologically confirmed PAA and patients in whom appendicitis was confidently excluded after diagnostic work-up, classified as non-surgical abdominal pain (NSAP). The BIDIAP index was applied using a predefined cutoff (≥ 4 points), and diagnostic performance was assessed using ROC analysis, calibration metrics, and decision curve analysis (DCA).Results: A total of 644 patients meeting the prespecified analytical criteria were included in the primary analysis. The BIDIAP index demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.92–0.95). The calibration slope was 1.00, and the intercept was close to zero, indicating close agreement between predicted and observed risks. At the prespecified cutoff value of ≥ 4 points, the BIDIAP index achieved a sensitivity of 90.5% and a specificity of 81.6%. DCA showed a positive net clinical benefit of the BIDIAP index over treat-all and treat-none strategies across the full range of clinically relevant threshold probabilities. Conclusions: The BIDIAP index demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance for PAA. Its simplicity, based on only three items, and its potential applicability even when the appendix is not visualized on ultrasonography make the BIDIAP index a promising tool for supporting clinical decision-making in routine pediatric emergency practice.
Posted: 16 January 2026
Adapting the Sepsis 1-Hour Bundle for Resource-Limited Settings: Lessons from Turkana, Kenya
Felix Pius Omullo
Posted: 07 January 2026
ED-to-Hospice Referrals: A Baseline Survey of One Hospital’s Experience
Bibi Razack
,Cristabella Cardone
,Taylor Bryan
,Chelsea Rampersad
,Raquel Lopez Defillo
,Illan Saji
,Mark Richman
Hospice and palliative care improve quality of life for patients with advanced illness, yet referrals from emergency departments (EDs) remain limited. This study aimed to establish a baseline rate of ED-initiated referrals from the Northwell’s Long Island Jewish Medical Center to its Health’s Hospice and Palliative Care Program between August and December 2024. Using an institutional database, we reviewed 262 referrals and identified referral sources, documentation of ED goals-of-care (GOC) discussions, and patient disposition. Only 5.3% of all palliative care referrals and 3.0% of actual hospice placement referrals originated from the ED, with a decline in ED GOC discussions over the study period. Nearly all referred patients were admitted or placed in observation rather than discharged home or directly to hospice. Persistent cultural, educational, and workflow barriers may limit integration of palliative care within the ED. Improved interdisciplinary communication, provider training, and structured ED-to-hospice pathways may increase appropriate referrals, reduce unnecessary hospitalizations, and promote goal-concordant end-of-life care. Establishing this baseline provides a foundation for future quality improvement initiatives aimed at enhancing patient-centered outcomes for Northwell patients with advanced illness.
Hospice and palliative care improve quality of life for patients with advanced illness, yet referrals from emergency departments (EDs) remain limited. This study aimed to establish a baseline rate of ED-initiated referrals from the Northwell’s Long Island Jewish Medical Center to its Health’s Hospice and Palliative Care Program between August and December 2024. Using an institutional database, we reviewed 262 referrals and identified referral sources, documentation of ED goals-of-care (GOC) discussions, and patient disposition. Only 5.3% of all palliative care referrals and 3.0% of actual hospice placement referrals originated from the ED, with a decline in ED GOC discussions over the study period. Nearly all referred patients were admitted or placed in observation rather than discharged home or directly to hospice. Persistent cultural, educational, and workflow barriers may limit integration of palliative care within the ED. Improved interdisciplinary communication, provider training, and structured ED-to-hospice pathways may increase appropriate referrals, reduce unnecessary hospitalizations, and promote goal-concordant end-of-life care. Establishing this baseline provides a foundation for future quality improvement initiatives aimed at enhancing patient-centered outcomes for Northwell patients with advanced illness.
Posted: 29 December 2025
Healthcare-Associated Infections Impact Mortality in Patients Admitted to Acute Care Hospital from Emergency Department
Andrea Fabbri
,Ayca Begum Tascioglu
,Flavio Bertini
,Barbara Benazzi
,Danilo Montesi
Posted: 23 December 2025
In-Hospital Cervical Spine Immobilization: Experimental Evaluation of Immobilization Devices
Andreas Gather
,Elena Oppermann
,Michael Kreinest
,Matthias Jung
,Paul Alfred Gruetzner
,Philipp Raisch
Posted: 08 December 2025
Assessment of the Relationship Between the Risk for Orbital Blowout Fracture After Trauma and Ethmoidal Sinus Morphometry Using the 3D Slicer Application
Meltem Özdemir
,Handan Soysal
,Erdem Özkan
,Selcen Yüksel
,Rasime Pelin Kavak
Posted: 05 December 2025
of 8