Sort by
Population-Level Assessment of Circumferential Flank Waviness Variability Using a ΔW1 Indicator Derived from CMM Measurements
Krisztián Horváth
Posted: 27 February 2026
Effects of Phytosterol Supplementation on miR-33a/b Expression in Human Cell Lines
Celma M. Martins
,Valéria A. Machado
,Margarida G. Carvalho
,Antonio M. Figueiredo-Neto
,Attilio Galhardo
,Francisco A.H. Fonseca
,Maria C. Izar
Posted: 27 February 2026
Effects of Formulation and Processing Variables on the Rheology of Chitosan–Vanillin Stabilized Olive Oil–Water Emulsions for Oleogel Applications
Leticia Montes
,David Rey
,Ramón Moreira
,Daniel Franco
Posted: 27 February 2026
Development of GeoGebra-Assisted E-Module in Multiple Integral Calculus Course
Torang Siregar
Posted: 27 February 2026
Multi-Scale Longevity: Defeating Aging from Cells to Embodied Human Minds, and the Future of the Species
Léo Pio-Lopez
,Michael Levin
Posted: 27 February 2026
Antibiotic-Resistant E. coli in Decentralized Wastewater Treatment System Effluents and Receiving Waters in a High-Income Setting: Implications for One Water and Health
Katherine Weise
,Shimul Ghosh
,Banna Das
,Aaron Bivins
Posted: 27 February 2026
Transport and Separation Characteristics of PVDF-Based Nanocomposite Membranes in Membrane Distillation
Syed Farzan Shah
,Naif A. Darwish
,Nabil Abdel Jabbar
,Sameer Al-Asheh
,Muhammad Qasim
,Farouq S. Mjalli
Posted: 27 February 2026
Algorithmic Optimization for Accelerated UDS Fuzzing in Cyber-Physical Automotive Networks: The BB-FAST Approach on LIN-Bus
Sungsik Im
,Yijoon Jung
,Junyoung Park
Posted: 27 February 2026
PFAS Compounds Display Distinct Toxicological Effects in Drosophila melanogaster, Reflected by Reduced Viability and Impaired Neuronal Function
Klara Luedtke
,Cristian Blanco Rocha
,Magdalena Svensson
,Ann-Christin Brorsson
Posted: 27 February 2026
EHMN 2026: A Thermodynamically Refined, SBML-Standardised Human Metabolic Network for Genome-Scale Analysis and QSP Integration
Igor Goryanin
,Irina V Goryanin
Posted: 27 February 2026
Operational Certification Horizons in Quantum Transport: Copy Time, Conservation Laws, and a Rigorous Diffusive Benchmark
Sacha Mohamed
Posted: 27 February 2026
Lipoxygenases and CFTR Inhibitory Factors Might Share the Same Role in Host-Microbe Interactions
Georgy Kurakin
Posted: 26 February 2026
Integrated Design of a Modular Lower-Limb Rehabilitation Exoskeleton: Multibody Simulation, Load-Driven Structural Optimization, and Experimental Validation
Ionut Geonea
,Andrei Corzanu
,Cristian Copilusi
,Adriana Ionescu
,Daniela Tarnita
Posted: 26 February 2026
The Psychology of Result-Focused Trading: Harmful Effects and Process-Based Interventions — A Narrative Review
Amirmohammad Shojaei
,Aref Mirzaei kouhbanani
Posted: 26 February 2026
To Cath or Not to Cath, That Is the Question? Towards a Minimally Invasive Pre-Glenn Assessment
Antoine Fakhry AbdelMassih
,Julia Ehab Doss
,Hana Amr Temsah
,Aayah Abdu Adem
,Nourhan Abdelhalim
,Malak Ashraf
,Shaza Elbaroudy
,Jala Sary
,Farida ElGhamry
Posted: 26 February 2026
Optimisation and Risk Management Techniques for a Virtual Power Plant
Orkhan Karimzada
,Danny Pujianto
Posted: 26 February 2026
Universal Suitability and Sustainability Index (USSI): A Comprehensive Framework for Greener Chromatographic Methods
Sami El Deeb
,Mohammed Al Broumi
,Reem K. Almarsafy
,Maria Kristina Parr
Posted: 26 February 2026
Lowered Maternal and Paternal Plasma Concentrations of Choline are Associated with the Severity of Congenital Heart Defects in the Offspring
Rima Obeid
,Annabelle Wagner
,Celina Löhfeln
,Jürgen Geisel
,Hashim Abdul-Khaliq
Posted: 26 February 2026
Geometric Resonance Analysis of Superconductivity in CaC6: Hexagonal and Rhombohedral Descriptions in the Roeser–Huber Framework
Michael R. Koblischka
,Anjela Koblischka-Veneva
The superconducting transition temperature of CaC6 is investigated within the Roeser–Huber (RH) formalism using both rhombohedral and hexagonal crystallographic representations. While these two descriptions are crystallographically equivalent, they differ in their geometric construction of superconducting paths and near-atom environments. In the rhombohedral representation, only translationally closed Ca–Ca vectors consistent with the primitive lattice are considered, yielding three symmetry-distinct RH paths. In the hexagonal representation, the same superconducting channels are expressed in an expanded conventional cell, where some paths appear as unfolded or symmetry-related sublattice connections. For each representation, the RH path lengths and effective near-atom counts are evaluated and used to compute the superconducting transition temperature. The rhombohedral description yields $T_c^{\rm(calc)} = 10.35$ K, while the hexagonal representation gives $T_c^{\rm(calc)} = 10.91$ K, both in good agreement with the experimental value $T_c^{\rm(exp)} = 11.5$ K. The difference between the calculat\( {The superconducting transition temperature of CaC$_6$ is investigated within the Roeser–Huber (RH) formalism using both rhombohedral and hexagonal crystallographic representations. While these two descriptions are crystallographically equivalent, they differ in their geometric construction of superconducting paths and near-atom environments. In the rhombohedral representation, only translationally closed Ca–Ca vectors consistent with the primitive lattice are considered, yielding three symmetry-distinct RH paths. In the hexagonal representation, the same superconducting channels are expressed in an expanded conventional cell, where some paths appear as unfolded or symmetry-related sublattice connections. For each representation, the RH path lengths and effective near-atom counts are evaluated and used to compute the superconducting transition temperature. The rhombohedral description yields $T_c^{\rm(calc)} = 10.35$ K, while the hexagonal representation gives $T_c^{\rm(calc)} = 10.91$ K, both in good agreement with the experimental value $T_c^{\rm(exp)} = 11.5$ K. The difference between the calculated values amounts to approximately 5.4\%. These results show that the underlying RH superconducting channels and their near-atom environments are representation independent, while minor quantitative differences in $T_c^{\rm(calc)}$ arise from metric redistribution of equivalent paths. This directly confirms that the RH formalism captures intrinsic structural features of superconductivity rather than artifacts of unit-cell representation. \)d values amounts to approximately 5.4\%. These results show that the underlying RH superconducting channels and their near-atom environments are representation independent, while minor quantitative differences in $T_c^{\rm(calc)}$ arise from metric redistribution of equivalent paths. This directly confirms that the RH formalism captures intrinsic structural features of superconductivity rather than artifacts of unit-cell representation.
The superconducting transition temperature of CaC6 is investigated within the Roeser–Huber (RH) formalism using both rhombohedral and hexagonal crystallographic representations. While these two descriptions are crystallographically equivalent, they differ in their geometric construction of superconducting paths and near-atom environments. In the rhombohedral representation, only translationally closed Ca–Ca vectors consistent with the primitive lattice are considered, yielding three symmetry-distinct RH paths. In the hexagonal representation, the same superconducting channels are expressed in an expanded conventional cell, where some paths appear as unfolded or symmetry-related sublattice connections. For each representation, the RH path lengths and effective near-atom counts are evaluated and used to compute the superconducting transition temperature. The rhombohedral description yields $T_c^{\rm(calc)} = 10.35$ K, while the hexagonal representation gives $T_c^{\rm(calc)} = 10.91$ K, both in good agreement with the experimental value $T_c^{\rm(exp)} = 11.5$ K. The difference between the calculat\( {The superconducting transition temperature of CaC$_6$ is investigated within the Roeser–Huber (RH) formalism using both rhombohedral and hexagonal crystallographic representations. While these two descriptions are crystallographically equivalent, they differ in their geometric construction of superconducting paths and near-atom environments. In the rhombohedral representation, only translationally closed Ca–Ca vectors consistent with the primitive lattice are considered, yielding three symmetry-distinct RH paths. In the hexagonal representation, the same superconducting channels are expressed in an expanded conventional cell, where some paths appear as unfolded or symmetry-related sublattice connections. For each representation, the RH path lengths and effective near-atom counts are evaluated and used to compute the superconducting transition temperature. The rhombohedral description yields $T_c^{\rm(calc)} = 10.35$ K, while the hexagonal representation gives $T_c^{\rm(calc)} = 10.91$ K, both in good agreement with the experimental value $T_c^{\rm(exp)} = 11.5$ K. The difference between the calculated values amounts to approximately 5.4\%. These results show that the underlying RH superconducting channels and their near-atom environments are representation independent, while minor quantitative differences in $T_c^{\rm(calc)}$ arise from metric redistribution of equivalent paths. This directly confirms that the RH formalism captures intrinsic structural features of superconductivity rather than artifacts of unit-cell representation. \)d values amounts to approximately 5.4\%. These results show that the underlying RH superconducting channels and their near-atom environments are representation independent, while minor quantitative differences in $T_c^{\rm(calc)}$ arise from metric redistribution of equivalent paths. This directly confirms that the RH formalism captures intrinsic structural features of superconductivity rather than artifacts of unit-cell representation.
Posted: 26 February 2026
Combined Transcriptomic and Proteomic Profiling Uncovers Developmental Dynamics of Autophagy in the Cortex
Francesca Nuzzolillo
,Clarissa Braccia
,Annapaola Andolfo
,Stefano de Pretis
,Michela Palmieri
Posted: 26 February 2026
of 5,604