Sort by
Challenging “Structure Determines Function”: Configuration-Independent Synchronization Stability Boundary and Spontaneous Synchronization
Yu Yuan
Posted: 19 January 2026
Exact and Approximate Constants of Motion in Stochastic Contact Processes
Damián Horacio Zanette
,Eric Rozán
Posted: 15 January 2026
HF Radar Signatures and Their Use for Target Classification, Recognition and Identification
HF Radar Signatures and Their Use for Target Classification, Recognition and Identification
Stuart John Anderson
Posted: 15 January 2026
A New Mechanics That Is Symmetrical to the Present Classical Mechanics
Huai-Yu Wang
Posted: 06 January 2026
Numerical Validation of the Discrete Extramental Clock Law: Hierarchical Emergence of Objective Time from Ordinal Conjunctions in Chaotic Systems
Johel Padilla
Posted: 26 December 2025
Fractal-Stochastic Emergence of Discrete Time in Chaotic Systems: Numerical Evidence Against Newtonian Absolutism
Johel Padilla
Posted: 23 December 2025
Feasibility of Combined Baropodometric and Stabilometric Assessment of Gait Symmetry in a Healthy Child: A Brief Report
Teodora Dominteanu
,Amelia Elena Stan
,Andreea Voinea
Posted: 22 December 2025
Thermal-Dependent Intermolecular Forces in Gases: A New Analytical Approach Based on Experimental Evidence
Chithra Piyadasa
Posted: 19 December 2025
Why Emergence and Self-Organization are Conceptually Simple, Common and Natural
Francis Heylighen
Posted: 19 December 2025
Statistical Distribution and Entropy of Multi-Scale Returns: A Coarse-Grained Analysis and Evidence for a New Stylized Fact
Alejandro Raúl Hernández Montoya
Posted: 15 December 2025
Mathematical Derivation of the Discrete Extramental Clock Law (Padilla-Villanueva 2025)
Johel Padilla-Villanueva
Posted: 09 December 2025
Discrete Extramental Time in Chaotic Systems: Event-Conjunction Model and Core Temporal Properties
Johel Padilla
Posted: 08 December 2025
Clarifying the Chaotic Range in Systemic Tau: The Intermediate Volatility Zone (|τₛ| < 0.41) and Its Implications for Complex Chaotic Systems
Johel Padilla
Posted: 01 December 2025
On Scientific Discovery – A Decision‐Machine Approach
Lizhi Xin
,Kevin Xin
Posted: 18 November 2025
Ahuraic Framework (AF) for Chiral Symmetry Breaking: Toward an Integrative Theory of Cosmic Creation, Chirality, and Biological Homochirality
Mahdi Jalali
,Sediqeh Jalali
Posted: 14 November 2025
On the Origin and Temporally Infinite Cosmos: A Modern Reappraisal Through Quantum Theory and the Kalam Argument
Sameer Al Khawaja
Posted: 10 November 2025
An Analysis of How Local Weather Patterns Are Affected by Climate Change
Mueletshedzi Mukhaninga
,Caston Sigauke
,Thakhani Ravele
Posted: 10 November 2025
A Glitch in Simulation or Reality: The Limits of Digital Ontology as Cosmological Theory
Sameer Al Khawaja
Posted: 04 November 2025
Understanding Gameplay Acceleration Ability, Using Static Start Assessments. Have We Got It Right?
Mark Edward Pryer
,John Cronin
,Jono Neville
,Nick Mascioli
,Chris Slocum
,Sean Barger
,Aaron Uthoff
Despite athletes initiating sprints from dynamic starts during gameplay, sprint performance is traditionally measured from a static position. This article aimed to determine whether static start or “pickup” acceleration are related or relatively independent motor qualities by assessing their relationship and examining how athletes’ rank order changes between static and pickup conditions. Thirty-one male athletes (20.3 ± 5.3 years) completed two 30 m sprints from a static start and two 30 m pickup accelerations following 20 m paced entries at 1.5 and 3.0 m/s, regulated by an LED system. Peak acceleration (amax) was measured via a horizontal linear position encoder (1080 Sprint). The shared variance between amax from the static and pickup starts was R2 =11.6-39.6%, indicating, for the most part, a great amount of unexplained variance. The shared variance between pickup acceleration entry velocities was R2 = 16.8%. Visual analysis of an individualized rank order table confirmed that, for the most part, the fastest static start athletes differed from the fastest pickup athletes. In summary, static and pickup acceleration seem relatively distinct motor abilities, most likely requiring a paradigm shift in strength and conditioning practice in terms of acceleration assessment and development.
Despite athletes initiating sprints from dynamic starts during gameplay, sprint performance is traditionally measured from a static position. This article aimed to determine whether static start or “pickup” acceleration are related or relatively independent motor qualities by assessing their relationship and examining how athletes’ rank order changes between static and pickup conditions. Thirty-one male athletes (20.3 ± 5.3 years) completed two 30 m sprints from a static start and two 30 m pickup accelerations following 20 m paced entries at 1.5 and 3.0 m/s, regulated by an LED system. Peak acceleration (amax) was measured via a horizontal linear position encoder (1080 Sprint). The shared variance between amax from the static and pickup starts was R2 =11.6-39.6%, indicating, for the most part, a great amount of unexplained variance. The shared variance between pickup acceleration entry velocities was R2 = 16.8%. Visual analysis of an individualized rank order table confirmed that, for the most part, the fastest static start athletes differed from the fastest pickup athletes. In summary, static and pickup acceleration seem relatively distinct motor abilities, most likely requiring a paradigm shift in strength and conditioning practice in terms of acceleration assessment and development.
Posted: 03 November 2025
Dependence of Surface Air Warming in Central Europe on CO2 Air Concentration and Sunshine Duration from 1915‐2024 and Discussion of the Concept of Cumulative CO2 Emissions
Jürg Thudium
,Carine Chélala
Posted: 31 October 2025
of 9