Sort by
Clarifying the Chaotic Range in Systemic Tau: The Intermediate Volatility Zone (|τₛ| < 0.41) and Its Implications for Complex Chaotic Systems
Johel Padilla
Posted: 01 December 2025
Network-Independent Synchronous Stability Boundary and Spontaneous Synchronization
Yu Yuan
Posted: 28 November 2025
On Scientific Discovery – A Decision‐Machine Approach
Lizhi Xin
,Kevin Xin
Posted: 18 November 2025
Ahuraic Framework (AF) for Chiral Symmetry Breaking: Toward an Integrative Theory of Cosmic Creation, Chirality, and Biological Homochirality
Mahdi Jalali
,Sediqeh Jalali
Posted: 14 November 2025
On the Origin and Temporally Infinite Cosmos: A Modern Reappraisal Through Quantum Theory and the Kalam Argument
Sameer Al Khawaja
Posted: 10 November 2025
An Analysis of How Local Weather Patterns Are Affected by Climate Change
Mueletshedzi Mukhaninga
,Caston Sigauke
,Thakhani Ravele
Posted: 10 November 2025
A Glitch in Simulation or Reality: The Limits of Digital Ontology as Cosmological Theory
Sameer Al Khawaja
Posted: 04 November 2025
Understanding Gameplay Acceleration Ability, Using Static Start Assessments. Have We Got It Right?
Mark Edward Pryer
,John Cronin
,Jono Neville
,Nick Mascioli
,Chris Slocum
,Sean Barger
,Aaron Uthoff
Despite athletes initiating sprints from dynamic starts during gameplay, sprint performance is traditionally measured from a static position. This article aimed to determine whether static start or “pickup” acceleration are related or relatively independent motor qualities by assessing their relationship and examining how athletes’ rank order changes between static and pickup conditions. Thirty-one male athletes (20.3 ± 5.3 years) completed two 30 m sprints from a static start and two 30 m pickup accelerations following 20 m paced entries at 1.5 and 3.0 m/s, regulated by an LED system. Peak acceleration (amax) was measured via a horizontal linear position encoder (1080 Sprint). The shared variance between amax from the static and pickup starts was R2 =11.6-39.6%, indicating, for the most part, a great amount of unexplained variance. The shared variance between pickup acceleration entry velocities was R2 = 16.8%. Visual analysis of an individualized rank order table confirmed that, for the most part, the fastest static start athletes differed from the fastest pickup athletes. In summary, static and pickup acceleration seem relatively distinct motor abilities, most likely requiring a paradigm shift in strength and conditioning practice in terms of acceleration assessment and development.
Despite athletes initiating sprints from dynamic starts during gameplay, sprint performance is traditionally measured from a static position. This article aimed to determine whether static start or “pickup” acceleration are related or relatively independent motor qualities by assessing their relationship and examining how athletes’ rank order changes between static and pickup conditions. Thirty-one male athletes (20.3 ± 5.3 years) completed two 30 m sprints from a static start and two 30 m pickup accelerations following 20 m paced entries at 1.5 and 3.0 m/s, regulated by an LED system. Peak acceleration (amax) was measured via a horizontal linear position encoder (1080 Sprint). The shared variance between amax from the static and pickup starts was R2 =11.6-39.6%, indicating, for the most part, a great amount of unexplained variance. The shared variance between pickup acceleration entry velocities was R2 = 16.8%. Visual analysis of an individualized rank order table confirmed that, for the most part, the fastest static start athletes differed from the fastest pickup athletes. In summary, static and pickup acceleration seem relatively distinct motor abilities, most likely requiring a paradigm shift in strength and conditioning practice in terms of acceleration assessment and development.
Posted: 03 November 2025
Dependence of Surface Air Warming in Central Europe on CO2 Air Concentration and Sunshine Duration from 1915‐2024 and Discussion of the Concept of Cumulative CO2 Emissions
Jürg Thudium
,Carine Chélala
Posted: 31 October 2025
Overview of Target Normal Sheath Acceleration Experiments and Diagnostics at SPARC_LAB
Federica Stocchi
,Maria Pia Anania
,Fabrizio Bisesto
,Alessandro Cianchi
,Mattia Cipriani
,Fabrizio Consoli
,Gemma Costa
,Alessandro Curcio
,Mario Galletti
,Riccardo Pompili
+4 authors
Posted: 15 October 2025
Circular and Hyperbolic Symmetry Unified in Hyper-Spacetime
Peter Brands
Posted: 14 October 2025
Matignon-Based Stability and Weight Synchronization of a Fractional Time Delay Neural Network Model
Asif Ullah
,Muhammad Shuaib
Posted: 07 October 2025
Fractional Anti-Synchronization in Physical Attractors: Quantifying Divergence with Systemic Tau
Johel Padilla
Posted: 02 October 2025
Cross-Domain Invariants: A Category-Theoretic Unification of Physics, Consciousness, and Biological Continuity
Moninder Singh Modgil
,Dnyandeo Dattatray Patil
Posted: 30 September 2025
Synthesis of Systemic Tau Concepts: An Integrated Overview of Padilla-Villanueva’s 2025 Preprints on Stability and Anti-Synchronization in Chaotic Systems
Johel Padilla
Posted: 25 September 2025
Validation of Anti-Synchronization in Chaotic Systems Using Systemic Tau from Padilla-Villanueva (2025)
Johel Padilla
Posted: 24 September 2025
From Earthbound to Stars: Analyzing Humanity’s Path to a Type II Civilization
Jonathan H. Jiang
,Prithwis Das
Posted: 23 September 2025
Unveiling Systemic Tau: Redefining the Fabric ofTime, Stability, and Emergent Order AcrossComplex Chaotic Systems in the Age of Interdisciplinary Discovery
Johel Padilla
Posted: 16 September 2025
VNA Tools - A Metrology Software Supporting the Digital Traceability Chain
Markus Zeier
,Michael Wollensack
,Johannes Hoffmann
,Peter Morrissey
,Juerg Ruefenacht
,Daniel Stalder
Posted: 10 September 2025
Analysis of Group-Subgroup Relationships within Bimorphic Monoclinic Minerals
Carl Drummond
,Princess Sarpong
,Peter Dragnev
Posted: 09 September 2025
of 9