Submitted:
09 February 2026
Posted:
12 February 2026
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
1.1. Novel Contributions and Scope
2. Coupled-Fields Theory and the CF-Bit
2.1. Derivation from Energy Functional
2.2. Network-Level Lyapunov Stability
3. Interaction Between CF-Bits and Ising Mapping
4. Mapping QUBO to CF Networks
4.1. Explicit 3×3 Example
5. Dynamics and Convergence
6. Simulation Results
6.1. 3-Bit Illustrative Example



6.2. Random 20-Bit QUBO Instances
6.3. Structured MaxCut Instances
6.4. Computational Cost and Scaling
7. Comparison with Alternative Optimization Approaches
7.1. Relation to Existing Oscillator-Based Ising Machines
7.2. Non-Existence of Lyapunov Functional in CIM/OIM Architectures
7.3. Relation to Classical Neural Energy Models
8. Convergence Properties and Role of Noise
8.1. Deterministic Lyapunov Convergence
8.2. Noise-Assisted Exploration


8.3. Comparison with Coherent Ising Machines
9. Applications
10. Discussion and Future Directions
10.1. Limitations
11. Conclusions
Funding
References
- Lucas, A. Ising formulations of many NP problems. Frontiers in Physics 2014, 2, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garey, M. R.; Johnson, D. S. Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness; W. H. Freeman, 1979. [Google Scholar]
- Barahona, F. On the computational complexity of Ising spin glass models. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 1982, 15, 3241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boros, E.; Hammer, P. L. Pseudo-Boolean optimization. Discrete Applied Mathematics 2002, 123, 155–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Glover, F.; Kochenberger, G. Handbook of Metaheuristics for QUBO and Ising Optimization; Springer, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Kadowaki, T.; Nishimori, H. Quantum annealing in the transverse Ising model. Physical Review E 1998, 58, 5355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnson, M. W.; et al. Quantum annealing with manufactured spins. Nature 2011, 473, 194–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yamamoto, Y. Coherent Ising machines—Optical hardware for solving optimization problems. npj Quantum Information 2017, 3, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Inagaki, T.; et al. A coherent Ising machine for 2000-node optimization problems. Science 2016, 354, 603–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- McMahon, P. L.; et al. A fully-programmable 100-spin coherent Ising machine with all-to-all connections. Science 2016, 354, 614–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, T.; Roychowdhury, J. Oscillator-based Ising machine. Nature Communications 2019, 10, 2472. [Google Scholar]
- Hopkins, F.; Wang, T.; Roychowdhury, J. CMOS Oscillator-based Ising Machines. IEEE Transactions on Computers 2020, 69(10), 1510–1525. [Google Scholar]
- Goto, H. Bifurcation-based adiabatic quantum computation with a nonlinear oscillator network. Scientific Reports 2016, 6, 21686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hopfield, J. J. Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. PNAS 1982, 79, 2554–2558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cohen, M. A.; Grossberg, S. Absolute stability and global pattern formation in competitive neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 1983, 13(5), 815–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwiat, D. Fermions: Spin, Hidden Variables, Violation of Bell’s Inequality and Quantum Entanglement. Journal of High Energy Physics, Gravitation and Cosmology 2024, 10(4). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwiat, D. (2025). Real-Field Coupled-Fields Computing Architecture and Optimization System. U.S. Patent Application 19/407,112.

| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Integration method | 4th-order Runge-Kutta |
| Time step (dt) | 0.01 |
| Damping coefficient (α) | 1.1 |
| Initial phase range | [0, 2π] uniform random |
| Initial velocity distribution | Gaussian, σ = 0.05 |
| Convergence threshold (ε) | 10−3 |
| QUBO coefficient normalization | [-1, 1] |
| Instance | Optimal Energy | CF Final Energy | Global Optimum? | Iterations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -23 | -23 | Yes | 164 |
| 2 | -17 | -16 | No | 188 |
| 3 | -21 | -21 | Yes | 152 |
| 4 | -19 | -19 | Yes | 171 |
| 5 | -25 | -24 | No | 193 |
| 6 | -18 | -18 | Yes | 142 |
| 7 | -22 | -21 | No | 201 |
| 8 | -20 | -20 | Yes | 167 |
| 9 | -24 | -24 | Yes | 158 |
| 10 | -16 | -15 | No | 207 |
| 11 | -22 | -22 | Yes | 149 |
| 12 | -23 | -22 | No | 195 |
| 13 | -20 | -20 | Yes | 161 |
| 14 | -21 | -21 | Yes | 173 |
| 15 | -18 | -17 | No | 185 |
| 16 | -26 | -26 | Yes | 159 |
| 17 | -19 | -19 | Yes | 147 |
| 18 | -25 | -24 | No | 203 |
| 19 | -22 | -22 | Yes | 166 |
| 20 | -21 | -21 | Yes | 172 |
| Method | Global Optima Found | Mean Runtime (ms) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| CF Network | 15/20 (75%) | ~45 | Numerical integration |
| Simulated Annealing | 16/20 (80%) | ~120 | CPU implementation |
| Random Local Search | 8/20 (40%) | ~15 | Greedy descent |
| Exhaustive Search | 20/20 (100%) | ~850000 | Exponential scaling |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.