Sort by
MRI and PET Alterations in Adult Skull-Base Tumors: A Narrative Review of Proton versus Photon Radiotherapy
Gokoulakrichenane Loganadane
,Valentin Calugaru
,Dimitri Anzellini
,Benjamin Nicaise
,Sarah Mezghani
,Nam P Nguyen
,Brandi R Page
Posted: 09 January 2026
A Literature Review on Hypothalamic–Pituitary–Adrenal (HPA) Axis Dysregulation in Older Adults with Cancer: A Missing Link in Predicting Treatment Toxicity?
Len De Nys
Posted: 08 January 2026
Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Static and Repetitive Magnetic Stimulation in Cancer Therapy: A Scoping Review
Amanda Stieven
,Dirson Stein
,Khetrüin Jordana Fiuza
,Felipe Fregni
,Wolnei Caumo
,Mariane da Cunha Jaeger
,Iraci L. S. Torres
Posted: 08 January 2026
Reproductive Toxicity of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Mechanisms, Clinical Evidence, and Oncofertility Implications with a Clinical Case Illustration
Cristina Tanase Damian
,Nicoleta Zenovia Antone
,Diana Loreta Paun
,Ioan Tanase
,Patriciu Andrei Achimaș-Cadariu
Posted: 08 January 2026
A Perplexing Plexopathy After Pembrolizumab Therapy in Early Stage Triple Negative Breast Cancer
Toluwalogo Baiyewun
,Brian McNamara
,Emily Aherne
,Alex Byran
,Julie Twomey
,Sorcha NiLoingsigh
,Aisling O'Connell
,Bola Ofi
,Derek Power
,Seamus O'Reilly
Posted: 07 January 2026
Integrating Digital Health into Oncology: A Comprehensive Review
Cesar U. Monjaras-Avila
,Dukagjin Blakaj
,Kenneth S. Hu
,Kosj Yamoah
,Emilio Gamez
,Andreu Comas
,Cinthya Portales
,Paulina Juarez
,Dante Mejia
,Sarah Hoffe
+2 authors
Posted: 07 January 2026
Autophagy in Cancer: Context-Dependent Regulation and Precision Nanomedicine–Enabled Therapeutic Targeting
Yuzhi Lu
,Ang Li
,Andong Liu
,Meng Li
,Meng Wang
Posted: 07 January 2026
Landscape of Germline Pathogenic Variants in Luminal Breast Cancer from an Under-Represented Southeast Asian Populations
Noorwati Sutandyo
,Yuniar Harris Prayitno
,Fahreza Saputra
,Ramadhan Karsono
Germline pathogenic variants influence breast cancer risk and clinical behavior, yet data from Indonesian populations remain scarce. In this pilot cross-sectional study, 31 newly diagnosed Indonesian women with luminal A or luminal B breast cancer underwent germline testing using a 113-gene hereditary cancer panel, with variants classified according to ACMG criteria and correlated with clinicopathological features. Pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were identified in 9 of 31 patients (29.0%), most frequently involving BRCA2, PALB2, and RECQL4. A significantly higher frequency of pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants was observed among patients with mixed invasive histology (3/3) compared with those with invasive carcinoma of no special type (6/27; p = 0.019), and a positive first-degree family history of breast cancer was also associated with pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant status (p = 0.022). This study provides the first description of germline pathogenic variants in Indonesian luminal breast cancer and suggests that mixed invasive histology and first-degree family cancer history may represent enrichment signals for hereditary predisposition, warranting validation in larger cohorts.
Germline pathogenic variants influence breast cancer risk and clinical behavior, yet data from Indonesian populations remain scarce. In this pilot cross-sectional study, 31 newly diagnosed Indonesian women with luminal A or luminal B breast cancer underwent germline testing using a 113-gene hereditary cancer panel, with variants classified according to ACMG criteria and correlated with clinicopathological features. Pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were identified in 9 of 31 patients (29.0%), most frequently involving BRCA2, PALB2, and RECQL4. A significantly higher frequency of pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants was observed among patients with mixed invasive histology (3/3) compared with those with invasive carcinoma of no special type (6/27; p = 0.019), and a positive first-degree family history of breast cancer was also associated with pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant status (p = 0.022). This study provides the first description of germline pathogenic variants in Indonesian luminal breast cancer and suggests that mixed invasive histology and first-degree family cancer history may represent enrichment signals for hereditary predisposition, warranting validation in larger cohorts.
Posted: 07 January 2026
Analysis of Genes Involved in Lung Cancer: Study of 101 Cases Through Massive Sequencing
Javier Azúa Romeo
,Arantxa Andueza Armendáriz
,Irene Rodríguez Pérez
,Bárbara Angulo Biedma
Posted: 06 January 2026
A Novel Anti-Cadherin 19 Monoclonal Antibody (Ca19Mab-8) for Flow Cytometry, Western Blotting, and Immunohistochemistry
Guanjie Li
,Hiroyuki Suzuki
,Mika K. Kaneko
,Yukinari Kato
Posted: 06 January 2026
Breast Cancer Patient Attitudes Towards Oncology Drug Costs in Ireland
Matthew Cronin
,Ruth Kieran
,Clara Steele
,Katie Cooke
,Seamus O’Reilly
Posted: 06 January 2026
DAMP Signaling and Immunogenic Cell Death in Glioblastoma: Radiotherapy-Induced Immune Reprogramming and Opportunities for Personalized Treatment
Kamila Rawojć
,Karolina Jezierska
,Kamil Kisielewicz
Posted: 05 January 2026
A Scoping Review on Nursing Interventions for Pain and Sleep Management in Cancer Patients Receiving Immunotherapy: Revealing Critical Gaps in Sleep Disturbance Assessment
Omar Alqaisi
,Guy Storme
,Kurian Joseph
,Edward Yu
,Kimberly Hagel
,Aoife Jones Thachuthara
,Suhair Al-Ghabeesh
Posted: 04 January 2026
Assessment of Meet-URO and CANLPH Prognostic Models in Metastatic RCC: Insights From a Single-Institution Cohort Predominantly Treated With TKIs
Ömer Faruk Kuzu
,Nuri Karadurmuş
,Nebi Batuhan Kanat
,Dilruba İlayda Özel Bozbağ
,Berkan Karadurmuş
,Esmanur Kaplan Tüzün
,Hüseyin Atacan
,Nurlan Mammadzada
,Emre Hafızoğlu
,Gizem Yıldırım
+3 authors
Background: Accurate prognostic assessment remains crucial in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), especially as treatment options have expanded beyond vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)–targeted therapies to include immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and ICI–TKI combinations. The widely used IMDC classification shows important limitations in the modern therapeutic era, highlighting the need for complementary prognostic tools. In this context, the Meet-URO and CANLPH scores—incorporating clinical, inflammatory, and nutritional markers have emerged as promising alternatives. Objective: To evaluate and compare the prognostic performance of the Meet-URO and CANLPH scoring systems in a real-world mRCC cohort predominantly treated with first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) monotherapy due to limited access to ICI-based combinations. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 112 patients with mRCC. The Meet-URO score was calculated for all patients, while the CANLPH score was assessed in 56 patients with complete laboratory data. CAR, NLR, and PHR were computed using baseline pre-treatment measurements. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) the latter defined exclusively for first-line therapy—were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Correlations between inflammatory markers and survival outcomes were analyzed using Spearman’s rho. Results: Meet-URO demonstrated clear prognostic stratification across all five categories, with the most favorable outcomes in score group 2 and progressively poorer OS and PFS in higher-risk groups. CANLPH also showed meaningful survival discrimination, with the highest inflammatory group (score 3) exhibiting markedly reduced OS and PFS. CAR was the strongest individual predictor of survival, while NLR and PHR showed weaker associations. Conclusion: Both Meet-URO and CANLPH provide strong, complementary prognostic information in mRCC, even in a cohort largely treated with TKI monotherapy. Their integration into routine risk assessment may enhance clinical decision-making, particularly in resource-limited settings.
Background: Accurate prognostic assessment remains crucial in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), especially as treatment options have expanded beyond vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)–targeted therapies to include immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and ICI–TKI combinations. The widely used IMDC classification shows important limitations in the modern therapeutic era, highlighting the need for complementary prognostic tools. In this context, the Meet-URO and CANLPH scores—incorporating clinical, inflammatory, and nutritional markers have emerged as promising alternatives. Objective: To evaluate and compare the prognostic performance of the Meet-URO and CANLPH scoring systems in a real-world mRCC cohort predominantly treated with first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) monotherapy due to limited access to ICI-based combinations. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 112 patients with mRCC. The Meet-URO score was calculated for all patients, while the CANLPH score was assessed in 56 patients with complete laboratory data. CAR, NLR, and PHR were computed using baseline pre-treatment measurements. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) the latter defined exclusively for first-line therapy—were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Correlations between inflammatory markers and survival outcomes were analyzed using Spearman’s rho. Results: Meet-URO demonstrated clear prognostic stratification across all five categories, with the most favorable outcomes in score group 2 and progressively poorer OS and PFS in higher-risk groups. CANLPH also showed meaningful survival discrimination, with the highest inflammatory group (score 3) exhibiting markedly reduced OS and PFS. CAR was the strongest individual predictor of survival, while NLR and PHR showed weaker associations. Conclusion: Both Meet-URO and CANLPH provide strong, complementary prognostic information in mRCC, even in a cohort largely treated with TKI monotherapy. Their integration into routine risk assessment may enhance clinical decision-making, particularly in resource-limited settings.
Posted: 01 January 2026
Nutritional Risk Screening in Gynaecologic Oncology Surgery: Importance, Scoring Systems, Recommendations and Practical Applications
Laura Rachel Caley
,Iman Mustafa
,Oliver Jagus
,Helen Hutchinson
,Amudha Thangavelu
,Timothy Broadhead
,David Nugent
,Alexandros Laios
Posted: 01 January 2026
Genetic Predictors of Response to Zolbetuximab in Gastric Adenocarcinoma
Shuhei Suzuki
,Manabu Seino
,Hidenori Sato
,Yosuke Saito
,Koki Saito
,Yuta Yamada
,Koshi Takahashi
,Ryosuke Kumanishi
,Tadahisa Fukui
,Masanobu Takahashi
Background/Objectives: The anti-CLDN18.2 antibody zolbetuximab has emerged as a novel therapeutic option for advanced gastric adenocarcinoma. However, robust predictive biomarkers for its efficacy remain an unmet need. Methods: Utilizing the Japanese Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics database, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical and genomic profiles of 49 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who received zolbetuximab-containing regimens. Due to Japanese health insurance regulations, these patients were deemed to have CLDN18.2-positive tumors. We explored the association between objective response rate (ORR) and concurrent genomic alterations, focusing on tumor mutational burden (TMB) and major mutations (TP53, ARID1A, CDH1). Results: The ORR to zolbetuximab-based therapy in this cohort was 22.2%. Statistical analysis revealed a trend toward higher clinical response in patients with lower TMB (median 1.82 in responders vs. 4.0 in non-responders; p=0.050). Furthermore, patients without a CDH1 single nucleotide variant also showed a suggestive trend toward better response (p=0.086). No significant associations were found with TP53 or ARID1A alterations (p=0.787 and p=0.239, respectively). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that low TMB and the absence of CDH1 variants may serve as potential predictive biomarkers for response to zolbetuximab in CLDN18.2-positive gastric cancer. Prospective validation is warranted to maximize patient selection for this targeted therapy.
Background/Objectives: The anti-CLDN18.2 antibody zolbetuximab has emerged as a novel therapeutic option for advanced gastric adenocarcinoma. However, robust predictive biomarkers for its efficacy remain an unmet need. Methods: Utilizing the Japanese Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics database, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical and genomic profiles of 49 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who received zolbetuximab-containing regimens. Due to Japanese health insurance regulations, these patients were deemed to have CLDN18.2-positive tumors. We explored the association between objective response rate (ORR) and concurrent genomic alterations, focusing on tumor mutational burden (TMB) and major mutations (TP53, ARID1A, CDH1). Results: The ORR to zolbetuximab-based therapy in this cohort was 22.2%. Statistical analysis revealed a trend toward higher clinical response in patients with lower TMB (median 1.82 in responders vs. 4.0 in non-responders; p=0.050). Furthermore, patients without a CDH1 single nucleotide variant also showed a suggestive trend toward better response (p=0.086). No significant associations were found with TP53 or ARID1A alterations (p=0.787 and p=0.239, respectively). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that low TMB and the absence of CDH1 variants may serve as potential predictive biomarkers for response to zolbetuximab in CLDN18.2-positive gastric cancer. Prospective validation is warranted to maximize patient selection for this targeted therapy.
Posted: 01 January 2026
LncRNAs at the Crossroads of Precision Nutrition and Cancer Chemoprevention
Camelia Munteanu
,Revathy Nadhan
,Sabina Turti
,Eftimia Prifti
,Larisa Achim
,Sneha Basu
,Alessandra Ferraresi
,Ji Hee Ha
,Ciro Isidoro
,Danny N Dhanasekaran
Posted: 31 December 2025
ANXA2P2 and PA2G4P4 Pseudogenes Are Associated with the Response to Ionizing Radiation and Could Be Used as Potential Biomarkers: In Silico Study
Tomasz Kolenda
,Piotr Białas
,Kacper Kamiński
,Maria Dziuba
,Małgorzata Czernecka
,Aleksandra Leszczyńska
,Kacper Guglas
,Joanna Kozłowska-Masłoń
,Paulina Poter
,Klaudia Dudek
+14 authors
Posted: 31 December 2025
Association of Iba1-Positive Macrophages and B7-H3-Positive Tumor Cells with Tumor Growth Kinetics in WHO Grade II Meningioma
Eiji Ito
,Masasuke Ohno
,Mao Yokota
,Shunichiro Kuramitsu
,Toru Nagasaka
,Toshiaki Inomo
,Tadashi Watanabe
,Mitsugu Fujita
Posted: 31 December 2025
A Novel Anti-CDH5/VE‐Cadherin Monoclonal Antibody (Ca5Mab-8) for Flow Cytometry, Western Blotting, and Immunohistochemistry
Haruto Yamamoto
,Hiroyuki Suzuki
,Mika K. Kaneko
,Yukinari Kato
Cadherin-5 (CDH5), also known as vascular endothelial cadherin (VE-cadherin), plays essential roles in endothelial cell adhesion, vascular barrier function, and signaling. CDH5 coordinates endothelial cell–cell junction during vascular remodeling, which is indispensable for both vascular homeostasis and adaptive responses to pathological stimuli. Although anti-CDH5 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) can be used for individual applications including flow cytometry, western blotting, and immunohistochemistry (IHC), highly sensitive and versatile anti-CDH5 mAbs for all applications remain limited. Here, novel anti-human CDH5 mAbs, designated Ca5Mabs, were developed using a flow cytometry-based high-throughput screening. Among them, a clone Ca5Mab-8 (IgG2a, κ) recognized CDH5-overexpressed Chinese hamster ovary-K1 (CHO/CDH5) cells in flow cytometry. Furthermore, Ca5Mab-8 also recognized endogenous CDH5-expressing human endothelial cell lines (HUVEC/TERT2 and HDMVEC/TERT164-B) and a cervical cancer cell line (Hela). These reactivities were superior to a commercially available anti-CDH5 mAb (clone BV9). The dissociation constant value of Ca5Mab-8 for CHO/CDH5 was determined as 6.1 × 10⁻9 M. Ca5Mab-8 can detect endogenous CDH5 in Western blotting. Moreover, Ca5Mab-8, but not BV9, is available for IHC to detect endothelial cells in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues. These results indicate that Ca5Mab-8 is versatile for research and are expected to contribute to clinical applications, such as tumor diagnosis and therapy.
Cadherin-5 (CDH5), also known as vascular endothelial cadherin (VE-cadherin), plays essential roles in endothelial cell adhesion, vascular barrier function, and signaling. CDH5 coordinates endothelial cell–cell junction during vascular remodeling, which is indispensable for both vascular homeostasis and adaptive responses to pathological stimuli. Although anti-CDH5 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) can be used for individual applications including flow cytometry, western blotting, and immunohistochemistry (IHC), highly sensitive and versatile anti-CDH5 mAbs for all applications remain limited. Here, novel anti-human CDH5 mAbs, designated Ca5Mabs, were developed using a flow cytometry-based high-throughput screening. Among them, a clone Ca5Mab-8 (IgG2a, κ) recognized CDH5-overexpressed Chinese hamster ovary-K1 (CHO/CDH5) cells in flow cytometry. Furthermore, Ca5Mab-8 also recognized endogenous CDH5-expressing human endothelial cell lines (HUVEC/TERT2 and HDMVEC/TERT164-B) and a cervical cancer cell line (Hela). These reactivities were superior to a commercially available anti-CDH5 mAb (clone BV9). The dissociation constant value of Ca5Mab-8 for CHO/CDH5 was determined as 6.1 × 10⁻9 M. Ca5Mab-8 can detect endogenous CDH5 in Western blotting. Moreover, Ca5Mab-8, but not BV9, is available for IHC to detect endothelial cells in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues. These results indicate that Ca5Mab-8 is versatile for research and are expected to contribute to clinical applications, such as tumor diagnosis and therapy.
Posted: 26 December 2025
of 104