Sort by
A Billion Ways to Ask a Question: A GCS-Based 10-Dimensional Framework for Inquiry Generation
Zi-Niu Wu
Posted: 13 April 2026
Orthographic Depth and Spelling Development in Immersion Education: A Predictive Framework of Spelling Errors in French
Annick Comblain
Posted: 03 April 2026
AI and Data Analytics in Sustainable Financial Reporting and ESG Disclosure: A Systematic Literature Review
Percy Antonio Vilchez Olivares
,Brandelt Jesús Artorga de la Cruz
Posted: 17 March 2026
WuYi. A Three-Level Cascade Architecture for Learning Chinese Radicals Through Sequential Multimodal Encoding, Narrative Chaining, and Mythological Macro-Organization
Stanislav E. Lauk-Dubitskiy
Posted: 17 March 2026
Redefining Linguistics: The Law of the Trio as a Universal Framework in Dialogue with Major Theories
Tedros Kifle Tesfa
Posted: 17 March 2026
Behavioral vs. Verbal Methods in Translation Quality Evaluation: A Cognitive Experimental Study
Xin Huang
,Xiang Zhang
Posted: 16 March 2026
Morphosyntactic Integration of Single-Word Anglicisms in Border Mexican Spanish
Ruben Roberto Peralta-Rivera
,Rafael Saldívar-Arreola
Posted: 13 March 2026
Using Translog-II for Conducting Keylogging Experiments
Longhui Zou
,Michael Carl
Posted: 13 March 2026
Artificial Intelligence and Academic Honesty: Challenges in the Digital Classroom
Taylor Smith Heathen
Posted: 28 February 2026
The Generalized Coordinate System for Rhetorical Modes
Zi-Niu Wu
Posted: 09 February 2026
Linguistic Misrepresentation in Pandemic Terminology: A Cognitive–Linguistic Critique of ‘Small Gatherings Cancellation’
Soheil Daneshzadeh
This article identifies a terminological misrepresentation in the expression ‘small gatherings cancellation’—ranked by Haug et al. (2020) as the most effective non-pharmaceutical intervention during the COVID-19 pandemic. Corpus-based and theoretical analyses demonstrate that small gathering conventionally denotes a planned or spontaneous social event, whereas the predicate cancellation reinforces this event-based frame. Consequently, the phrase fails to capture the intended reference to restrictions on simultaneous presence in commercial or professional settings. Drawing on cognitive-linguistic theory and institutional usage from the WHO and CDC, this paper shows how such misrepresentation may trigger unintended conceptual frames, leading to interpretive ambiguity in both scholarly and policy contexts. Three alternatives are proposed to achieve better semantic alignment and enhance terminological precision and communicative clarity in future public-health discourse.
This article identifies a terminological misrepresentation in the expression ‘small gatherings cancellation’—ranked by Haug et al. (2020) as the most effective non-pharmaceutical intervention during the COVID-19 pandemic. Corpus-based and theoretical analyses demonstrate that small gathering conventionally denotes a planned or spontaneous social event, whereas the predicate cancellation reinforces this event-based frame. Consequently, the phrase fails to capture the intended reference to restrictions on simultaneous presence in commercial or professional settings. Drawing on cognitive-linguistic theory and institutional usage from the WHO and CDC, this paper shows how such misrepresentation may trigger unintended conceptual frames, leading to interpretive ambiguity in both scholarly and policy contexts. Three alternatives are proposed to achieve better semantic alignment and enhance terminological precision and communicative clarity in future public-health discourse.
Posted: 05 February 2026
Near-Merger and Contextual Sensitivity in the Perception of /n–l/ in Sichuan Mandarin
Minghao Zheng
,Allen Shamsi
,Ratree Wayland
Posted: 23 January 2026
Comparing Different Physics Fields Using Statistical Linguistics
María Fernanda Sánchez-Puig
,Carlos Gershenson
,Carlos Pineda
Posted: 13 January 2026
Perceptual (Static) Active Inference Approach to the Superior Production Effect of Speaking over Writing: An Experiment and Computational Model Report
Roberto Limongi
,Oluwagbemisola Oguntoye
,Angelica Silva
Posted: 16 December 2025
Trace & Trajectory Semantics: Meaning Dynamics in Pre-Representational Space
Luis Escobar L.-Dellamary
Posted: 05 December 2025
Gestures and Signs Are Phrases Not Words: A High Definition Account
Luis Escobar L.-Dellamary
Posted: 25 November 2025
An Analysis of Root Words from Different Languages in the Holy Quran: A Linguistic Analysis
Kazi Abdul Mannan
,Khandaker Mursheda Farhana
Posted: 27 October 2025
Robot-Assisted Language Learning: A Bibliometric Review and Visualization Analysis
Bing Cheng
,Yu Zou
,Xiaojuan Zhang
,Yang Zhang
Posted: 27 October 2025
Modeling Individual Differences in Categorical Perception with a Bayesian Framework
Xiaojuan Zhang
,Bing Cheng
,Xi Xiang
,Yang Zhang
Posted: 27 October 2025
Root Mean Square Error as a Robust Index of Gradient Speech Perception
Bing Cheng
,Xiangrong Dai
,Xi Xiang
,Xiaojuan Zhang
,Yang Zhang
This study introduces the root mean square error (RMSE) as a new metric for quantifying gradient speech perception in visual analog scale (VAS) tasks. By measuring the deviation of individual responses from an ideal linear mapping between stimulus and percept, RMSE offers a theoretically transparent alternative to traditional metrics like slope, response consistency, and the quadratic coefficient. To validate these metrics, we first used simulated data representing five distinct perceptual response profiles: ideal gradient, categorical, random, midpoint-biased, and conservative. The results revealed that only RMSE correctly tracked the degree of true gradiency, increasing monotonically from the ideal gradient profile (RMSE = 5.48) to random responding (RMSE = 42.16). In contrast, traditional metrics failed critically; for example, slope misclassified non-gradient, midpoint-biased responding as highly gradient (slope = 0.24). When applied to published empirical VAS data, RMSE demonstrated strong convergent validity, correlating robustly with response consistency (r ranging from -0.44 to -0.89) while avoiding the ambiguities of other measures. Crucially, RMSE exhibited moderate-to-high cross-continuum stability (mean r = 0.51), indicating it captures a stable, trait-like perceptual style. By providing a more robust and interpretable measure, RMSE offers a clearer lens for investigating the continuous nature of phonetic categorization and individual differences in speech perception.
This study introduces the root mean square error (RMSE) as a new metric for quantifying gradient speech perception in visual analog scale (VAS) tasks. By measuring the deviation of individual responses from an ideal linear mapping between stimulus and percept, RMSE offers a theoretically transparent alternative to traditional metrics like slope, response consistency, and the quadratic coefficient. To validate these metrics, we first used simulated data representing five distinct perceptual response profiles: ideal gradient, categorical, random, midpoint-biased, and conservative. The results revealed that only RMSE correctly tracked the degree of true gradiency, increasing monotonically from the ideal gradient profile (RMSE = 5.48) to random responding (RMSE = 42.16). In contrast, traditional metrics failed critically; for example, slope misclassified non-gradient, midpoint-biased responding as highly gradient (slope = 0.24). When applied to published empirical VAS data, RMSE demonstrated strong convergent validity, correlating robustly with response consistency (r ranging from -0.44 to -0.89) while avoiding the ambiguities of other measures. Crucially, RMSE exhibited moderate-to-high cross-continuum stability (mean r = 0.51), indicating it captures a stable, trait-like perceptual style. By providing a more robust and interpretable measure, RMSE offers a clearer lens for investigating the continuous nature of phonetic categorization and individual differences in speech perception.
Posted: 24 October 2025
of 8