Sort by
An Architecture-Feature-Enhanced Decision Framework for Deep Learning-Based Prediction of Extreme and Imbalanced Precipitation
WenJiu Yu
,YingNa Sun
,ZhiCheng Yue
,ZhiNan Li
,YuJia Liu
Posted: 05 December 2025
Antarctic Ice Core Harmonic Analysis
Joseph Higginbotham
Posted: 04 December 2025
Assessment of Remote Sensing Precipitation Products for Improved Drought Monitoring in Southern Tanzania
Vincent Ogembo
,Erasto Benedict Mukama
,Ernest Ronoh
,Gavin Akinyi
Posted: 04 December 2025
An Integrated Assessment of Thermodynamic and Dynamic Linkages Across Land, Atmosphere, and Ocean Systems
Sridhara Nayak
Posted: 03 December 2025
Ski Resort Snow Surface Roughness
Steven R. Fassnacht
,Javier Herrero
,Jessica E. Sanow
Posted: 02 December 2025
A Model Downscaling Study of a Wind Park Exposure to Extreme Weather: A Case of Storm ‘Ylva’ in Arctic Norway
Igor Esau
,Pravin Punde
,Yngve Birkelund
Wind energy has the potential to become an important source of energy for remote Arctic regions. However, there are risks associated with the exposure of coastal wind parks to extremely strong winds caused by storms and polar lows. Extreme winds can either enhance or reduce wind energy production. The outcomes largely depend on the coastal landscape surrounding the wind park. To address these questions, we conducted a series of simulations using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model. This study focuses on one of the strongest wind events along the western Norwegian coast - the landfall of the storm “Ylva” (November 24–27, 2017). The study employs terrain-resolving downscaling by zooming in on the area of the Kvitfjell-Raudfjell wind park, Norway. The terrain-resolving WRF simulations reveal stronger winds at turbine hub height (80 m to 100 m above the ground level) in the coastal area. However, it was previously overlooked that the landfall of an Atlantic storm, which approaches this area from the southwest, brings the strongest winds from southeast directions, i.e., from the land. This creates geographically extensive and vertically deep wind-sheltered areas along the coast. Wind speeds at hub height in these sheltered areas are reduced, while they remain extreme over wind-channeling sea fjords. The study demonstrates that optimal wind park siting can take advantage of both sustained westerly winds during normal weather conditions and wind sheltering during extreme storm conditions. We found that the Kvitfjell-Raudfjell location is nearly optimal with respect to the extreme winds of “Ylva.”
Wind energy has the potential to become an important source of energy for remote Arctic regions. However, there are risks associated with the exposure of coastal wind parks to extremely strong winds caused by storms and polar lows. Extreme winds can either enhance or reduce wind energy production. The outcomes largely depend on the coastal landscape surrounding the wind park. To address these questions, we conducted a series of simulations using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model. This study focuses on one of the strongest wind events along the western Norwegian coast - the landfall of the storm “Ylva” (November 24–27, 2017). The study employs terrain-resolving downscaling by zooming in on the area of the Kvitfjell-Raudfjell wind park, Norway. The terrain-resolving WRF simulations reveal stronger winds at turbine hub height (80 m to 100 m above the ground level) in the coastal area. However, it was previously overlooked that the landfall of an Atlantic storm, which approaches this area from the southwest, brings the strongest winds from southeast directions, i.e., from the land. This creates geographically extensive and vertically deep wind-sheltered areas along the coast. Wind speeds at hub height in these sheltered areas are reduced, while they remain extreme over wind-channeling sea fjords. The study demonstrates that optimal wind park siting can take advantage of both sustained westerly winds during normal weather conditions and wind sheltering during extreme storm conditions. We found that the Kvitfjell-Raudfjell location is nearly optimal with respect to the extreme winds of “Ylva.”
Posted: 02 December 2025
The Capabilities of WRF in Simulating Extreme Rainfall over Mahalapye District of Botswana
Khumo Cecil Monaka
,Kgakgamatso Mphale
,Thizwilondi Robert Maisha
,Modise Wiston
,Galebonwe Ramaphane
Posted: 28 November 2025
Statistical-Induced Uncertainties in Climate Modeling: Challenges and the Imperative of Physical Process-Oriented Closure
Jamel Chahed
Posted: 27 November 2025
Quantifying the Impact of High Emitters on Vehicle Emissions: An Analysis of Ecuador's Inspection and Maintenance Program
Sergio Ibarra-Espinosa
,Zamir Mera
,Karl Ropkins
,Jose Antonio Mantovani
Posted: 27 November 2025
Mechanisms of Topographic Steering and Track Morphology of Typhoon-like Vortices over Complex Terrain: A Dynamic Model Approach
Hung-Cheng Chen
Posted: 26 November 2025
Resonant Forcing of Oceanic and Atmospheric Rossby Waves in (Sub)Harmonic Modes: Climate Impacts
Jean-Louis Pinault
Posted: 26 November 2025
Atmospheric River Clustering in the Western United States with Seasonal Cycles and Climate Modes
David M. Harrison
,Ling Chen
,Emma J. Roberts
,Tom van der Meer
Posted: 24 November 2025
Validation of the Emission Inventory of the Year 2021 from the City of Cuenca, Ecuador, Through Weather and Air Quality Modeling Using WRF-Chem
Rene Parra
,Cristian Caguana
,Claudia Espinoza
The last atmospheric emission inventory for Cuenca, a city located in the Andean region of southern Ecuador, was developed for the year 2021 (EI 2021), encompassing both primary pollutants (NOx, CO, VOC, SO2, PM10, and PM2.5) and greenhouse gases (CO2, CH4, and N2O). We formally assessed the quality of the emission inventory by modeling air quality levels during October 2021 using the Weather Research and Forecasting with Chemistry (WRF-Chem 3.2) model at a high spatial resolution (1 km). We activated the direct effects for modeling the feedback between aerosols and atmospheric variables. The metrics indicated that both meteorological and air quality variables were modeled acceptably, suggesting the quality of the emission inventory and the ability of WRF-Chem 3.2 to perform atmospheric modeling in this complex region, using the “one atmosphere” approach. The results and spatial distribution of the EI 2021 were compared to the emission data coming from the last version of the Edgar Emissions Dataset (spatial resolution of 11.1 km) one of the most used global emission data, which suggested that for the Equatorial Andean region, the Edgar Dataset results require improvement, at least for some primary pollutants (CO, VOC, SO2) in terms of magnitude, and of the spatial configuration of all the pollutants, before they can be used for atmospheric modeling. We also identified future research activities to improve the emission inventories and atmospheric modeling performance in the Equatorial Andean region.
The last atmospheric emission inventory for Cuenca, a city located in the Andean region of southern Ecuador, was developed for the year 2021 (EI 2021), encompassing both primary pollutants (NOx, CO, VOC, SO2, PM10, and PM2.5) and greenhouse gases (CO2, CH4, and N2O). We formally assessed the quality of the emission inventory by modeling air quality levels during October 2021 using the Weather Research and Forecasting with Chemistry (WRF-Chem 3.2) model at a high spatial resolution (1 km). We activated the direct effects for modeling the feedback between aerosols and atmospheric variables. The metrics indicated that both meteorological and air quality variables were modeled acceptably, suggesting the quality of the emission inventory and the ability of WRF-Chem 3.2 to perform atmospheric modeling in this complex region, using the “one atmosphere” approach. The results and spatial distribution of the EI 2021 were compared to the emission data coming from the last version of the Edgar Emissions Dataset (spatial resolution of 11.1 km) one of the most used global emission data, which suggested that for the Equatorial Andean region, the Edgar Dataset results require improvement, at least for some primary pollutants (CO, VOC, SO2) in terms of magnitude, and of the spatial configuration of all the pollutants, before they can be used for atmospheric modeling. We also identified future research activities to improve the emission inventories and atmospheric modeling performance in the Equatorial Andean region.
Posted: 19 November 2025
A Case Study on Targeting a Practically Simple Pre-Training Method to Enhance Machine Learning-Based Climate Prediction Models
Xiangjun Shi
,Ping Zhou
,Nanzhu Qin
,Zhaojun Hou
,Er Lu
Posted: 13 November 2025
LES Study of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Conditions During the Mosquito Wildland Fire Event and Implications for Smoke-Plume Transport
Kiran Bhaganagar
,Ralph A. Kahn
,Sudheer R. BhimiReddy
Posted: 13 November 2025
How Do Different Precipitation Products Perform in a Dry-Climate Region?
Noelle Brobst-Whitcomb
,Viviana Maggioni
Posted: 12 November 2025
Atmospheric Methane and Carbon Dioxide Background Levels Computed by Modeling at Three WMO/GAW Stations in the Mediterranean Basin
Luana Malacaria
,Teresa Lo Feudo
,Giorgia De Benedetto
,Francesco D'Amico
,Salvatore Sinopoli
,Daniel Gullì
,Ivano Ammoscato
,Claudia Roberta Calidonna
,Salvatore Piacentino
,Alcide Giorgio di Sarra
+2 authors
Posted: 10 November 2025
Effect of COVID19 Aerosol Reduction on Rainfall in the Western United States
James Miller
,Liwen Chen
,Anna K. Roberts
Posted: 10 November 2025
An Interpretable Machine Learning Approach for Quantitative Precipitation Estimation from Multi-Source Remote Sensing Data
Kefeng Deng
,Dawei Li
,Di Zhang
,Hongze Leng
,Yudi Liu
,Junqiang Song
Posted: 10 November 2025
Short Term Temperature Forecast Correction in the Sierra Nevada with Analog Ensemble Method for Snowmelt Streamflow and Water Storage Prediction
Luca Rossi
,Giulia Bianchi
,Marco Conti
,Elena Ferraro
Posted: 10 November 2025
of 61