Sort by
The Eviction Cliff: Pandemic Moratoria, Structural Breaks, and Housing Vulnerability in Florida
Antoine Lovell
,Earl J. Edwards
,Jennifer R. Daniels
Posted: 04 December 2025
Remarkable Artifact Discoveries in Mexico
Alberto Donini
,Tomas Hrico
Posted: 03 December 2025
Impact of the Stress Suppression Processes and Counseling Strategies for Police Officers: A Qualitative Content Analysis
Wen-Ling Hung
Posted: 01 December 2025
Analysis of Bioregional Development Scenarios in Latvia
Daniela Klavina
,Liga Proskina
,Kaspars Naglis-Liepa
,Sallija Cerina
Posted: 27 November 2025
The Hidden Legal and Ethical Questions Behind Artificial Intelligence
Alia Hamdy
Posted: 27 November 2025
A Transdisciplinary Unified Framework for Civilization Evolution: The Cognition-Substitution-Intensification Spiral Model
Xinqi Zheng
,Haiyan Liu
Posted: 26 November 2025
Event Definition and Dimensional Entanglement for Composite Event Recognition
Xinqi Zheng
,Haiyan Liu
Posted: 26 November 2025
Quantum Lenses for the Macroscopic World: Metaphorical Interpretations and Generalized Applications of Quantum Entanglement
Xinqi Zheng
,Haiyan Liu
Posted: 26 November 2025
A Quantum Metaphor Framework Mapping Yin-Yang Superposition and Wuxing Entanglement
Xinqi Zheng
,Haiyan Liu
Posted: 20 November 2025
Use of a Mobile Phone for Assessing the Intensity of Strength Exercises – Pilot Study
Ľuboslav Šiska
,Gheorghe Balint
,Jozef Zentko
,Daniel Židek
,Peter Krška
,Nela Tatiana Balint
,Silviu Ioan Pavel
,Nicolae Lucian Voinea
Posted: 19 November 2025
A Generalized Technology Readiness Level Scale for Measuring Technology Maturity: Development and Pilot Validation Study
Malcolm Townes
This paper presents two versions of a generalized technology readiness level (GTRL) scale that is intended to be less susceptible to idiosyncratic variation than the NASA TRL scale as well as the results of a pilot study for validating it. Trends in university technology transfer practices in the United States of America (U.S.) and proposed modifications to U.S. public policy underscore the need for validated instruments to assess the maturity of technologies. Developing and validating practical instruments that technology transfer practitioners in federal laboratories, universities, and the private sector can use to consistently assess the maturity of technologies has been identified as a gap in the literature on research management and technology transfer. The NASA TRL scale appears to be the most widely adopted instrument for measuring technology maturity. Anecdotal testimony from university technology transfer practitioners and evidence in the literature indicate that the NASA TRL scale is likely subject to idiosyncratic variation. This has significant negative implications for technology transfer research, practice, and public policy. This paper highlights the need for validated measurement instruments for assessing the maturity of technologies in various contexts, demonstrates that the NASA TRL scale can be modified to make it more practical and less susceptible to idiosyncratic variation, and shows that traditional methods for evaluating the validity and reliability of measurement instruments can be successfully applied to technology maturity measurement instruments that are structured as readiness level scales. The paper also provides specific recommendations for future large-scale studies to validate the GTRL scale.
This paper presents two versions of a generalized technology readiness level (GTRL) scale that is intended to be less susceptible to idiosyncratic variation than the NASA TRL scale as well as the results of a pilot study for validating it. Trends in university technology transfer practices in the United States of America (U.S.) and proposed modifications to U.S. public policy underscore the need for validated instruments to assess the maturity of technologies. Developing and validating practical instruments that technology transfer practitioners in federal laboratories, universities, and the private sector can use to consistently assess the maturity of technologies has been identified as a gap in the literature on research management and technology transfer. The NASA TRL scale appears to be the most widely adopted instrument for measuring technology maturity. Anecdotal testimony from university technology transfer practitioners and evidence in the literature indicate that the NASA TRL scale is likely subject to idiosyncratic variation. This has significant negative implications for technology transfer research, practice, and public policy. This paper highlights the need for validated measurement instruments for assessing the maturity of technologies in various contexts, demonstrates that the NASA TRL scale can be modified to make it more practical and less susceptible to idiosyncratic variation, and shows that traditional methods for evaluating the validity and reliability of measurement instruments can be successfully applied to technology maturity measurement instruments that are structured as readiness level scales. The paper also provides specific recommendations for future large-scale studies to validate the GTRL scale.
Posted: 18 November 2025
The Meta-Model of Existential Dynamics: A Systems-Ontological Framework Based on Necessary Constraints
Hao Tian
Posted: 18 November 2025
Effects of 5-Weeks In-Season Combined Resistance Training Using Isoinertial Training and a Vertical Cone-Shaped Flywheel Device on the Performance of U-16 Male Volleyball Players
Moisés de Hoyo
,Borja Sañudo
,Fabio Y. Nakamura
,Luis Carrasco
,Francisco J. Núñez
,Miguel Rodríguez-Rosal
,Alejandro Muñoz-López
Posted: 13 November 2025
Unintended Consequences of COVID-19: The Rise of Anti-Asian Violence and Integrative Medicine
Ana M. Ning
Posted: 13 November 2025
Tending the Artifact Ecology: Cultivating Architectural Ecosystems
Joe Manganelli
Posted: 12 November 2025
One Sport or Many? Comparing Athletics and Multiactivity Training on Motor Competence in 6-10-Year-Olds
Nataniel Lopes
,Miguel Jacinto
,Diogo Monteiro
,Rui Matos
,Sérgio J. Ibáñez
Posted: 05 November 2025
Women’s Experiences During Childbirth: A Systematic Review
Marta Gorina
,Sonia Lorente
,Jaume Vives
,Josep-Maria Losilla
Background: In the context of reproductive health, women have the right to positive birth experiences that safeguard both physical integrity and emotional well-being. Within this framework, we conducted a systematic review aiming to synthesize evidence on women’s experiences -both positive and non-positive- during childbirth in formal healthcare settings, classify these experiences, describe their prevalence, and assess their impact on women’s self-perceived health. Methods: The protocol was prior registered, and the review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Searches were conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, and Google Scholar. The risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute tools. Results: A total of 40 studies from 14 countries were included, encompassing 80,295 women. Findings revealed a broad spectrum of positive and non-positive experiences, latter with prevalence rates ranging from 4.5% to 61.3%. Moreover, 7 of the 40 studies (n = 50,395 women) documented instances of disrespectful and abusive care practices. Reported prevalence ranged from 2.4% to 83.4% for non-consensual procedures, 0.8% to 24.4% for non-dignified care, and 5.4% to 48% for abandonment of care. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that there is room for improvement related to the childbirth experience. Promoting positive birth experiences and sensitizing healthcare professionals to improve respectful maternity care are key priorities. In this regard, adopting a patient-centered model may represent a paradigm shift, empowering women to make informed decisions and enhancing maternal health outcomes.
Background: In the context of reproductive health, women have the right to positive birth experiences that safeguard both physical integrity and emotional well-being. Within this framework, we conducted a systematic review aiming to synthesize evidence on women’s experiences -both positive and non-positive- during childbirth in formal healthcare settings, classify these experiences, describe their prevalence, and assess their impact on women’s self-perceived health. Methods: The protocol was prior registered, and the review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Searches were conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, and Google Scholar. The risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute tools. Results: A total of 40 studies from 14 countries were included, encompassing 80,295 women. Findings revealed a broad spectrum of positive and non-positive experiences, latter with prevalence rates ranging from 4.5% to 61.3%. Moreover, 7 of the 40 studies (n = 50,395 women) documented instances of disrespectful and abusive care practices. Reported prevalence ranged from 2.4% to 83.4% for non-consensual procedures, 0.8% to 24.4% for non-dignified care, and 5.4% to 48% for abandonment of care. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that there is room for improvement related to the childbirth experience. Promoting positive birth experiences and sensitizing healthcare professionals to improve respectful maternity care are key priorities. In this regard, adopting a patient-centered model may represent a paradigm shift, empowering women to make informed decisions and enhancing maternal health outcomes.
Posted: 30 October 2025
“What the Meta Is Going on?” A Scoping Review of the Different Approaches to Qualitative Synthesis
Andrew Soundy
Posted: 22 October 2025
An Analysis of Employment Laws and Policies for the Visually Impaired Individuals in Bangladesh
Parvez Miah
As a lower middle income country, Bangladesh has still been facing challenges in fulfilling the rights of people with visual impairment because the employment opportunities for the people with visual impairment is remain limited despite the government and international donor organizations are providing support to these communities. With approximately one million visually impaired people in Bangladesh, the visually impaired people are facing systemic barriers in education, training and employment because of lacking of accommodations, social stigma, superstition, weak employment policies for the disabled etc. This paper examines the laws and policies for the people with visual impairment in Bangladesh focusing on the major legislatives initiatives including The Rights and Protection of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2013, The Disability Act 2001, Ratification of UNCRPD, 2007 and other legal frameworks for the people with disabilities in Bangladesh. This study addressed key challenges including inaccessible educational materials, attitudinal barriers, lack of accommodations, weak enforcement abilities, lack of advocacy for the employment of visually impaired in Bangladesh. To explore the legal frameworks of different countries for the people with visual impairment, the study conducted a comparative analysis with employment policies in the UK and the USA that addressed the major gaps in Bangladesh in particular in assistive technology, vocational training, government support and social response. The paper recommended that the government should reform the existing policies and suggested to implement a visually impaired oriented employment act and increase the training programs. The paper also recommended that the government should establish a dedicated Visual Impairment Employment Taskforce to reduce the employment challenges for the people with visually impaired. By addressing these issues and implementing these suggestions, Bangladesh can ensure the inclusive society and minimize the employment discrimination for the people with visual impairment.
As a lower middle income country, Bangladesh has still been facing challenges in fulfilling the rights of people with visual impairment because the employment opportunities for the people with visual impairment is remain limited despite the government and international donor organizations are providing support to these communities. With approximately one million visually impaired people in Bangladesh, the visually impaired people are facing systemic barriers in education, training and employment because of lacking of accommodations, social stigma, superstition, weak employment policies for the disabled etc. This paper examines the laws and policies for the people with visual impairment in Bangladesh focusing on the major legislatives initiatives including The Rights and Protection of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2013, The Disability Act 2001, Ratification of UNCRPD, 2007 and other legal frameworks for the people with disabilities in Bangladesh. This study addressed key challenges including inaccessible educational materials, attitudinal barriers, lack of accommodations, weak enforcement abilities, lack of advocacy for the employment of visually impaired in Bangladesh. To explore the legal frameworks of different countries for the people with visual impairment, the study conducted a comparative analysis with employment policies in the UK and the USA that addressed the major gaps in Bangladesh in particular in assistive technology, vocational training, government support and social response. The paper recommended that the government should reform the existing policies and suggested to implement a visually impaired oriented employment act and increase the training programs. The paper also recommended that the government should establish a dedicated Visual Impairment Employment Taskforce to reduce the employment challenges for the people with visually impaired. By addressing these issues and implementing these suggestions, Bangladesh can ensure the inclusive society and minimize the employment discrimination for the people with visual impairment.
Posted: 21 October 2025
Logic and Innateness. What is the Connection Between them?
Viktor Dudkevych
,Olha Kovalchuk
Posted: 17 October 2025
of 15