Sort by
Quality of Prison Life and Physical Environment: What Is Predictive of Prisoners’ Overall Satisfaction with the Prison?
Hilde Pape
,Berit Johnsen
Posted: 20 January 2026
Youth Unemployment & Job Crisis: A Situation Analysis and Way Forward
Anika Tasnim
Posted: 14 January 2026
China-Africa Agricultural Cooperation Towards Sustainable Development Goals: Present Situation, Challenges and Prospect
Wenjie Zhao
,Lili Zhu
,Lili Lu
Posted: 13 January 2026
Multi-Level Constraint Recursive Realization: An Inter-Level Integrative Framework from Physics to Society
Hao Tian
Understanding the continuity from physical and biological systems to the mind and society remains a fundamental scientific challenge, often hindered by disciplinary fragmentation. This paper proposes the Multi-level Constraint Recursive Realization (MCRR) framework to offer a unified, first-principles-based account of this continuity. Its core thesis is that any persistent dissipative structure must satisfy three irreducible meta-constraints: (1) acquiring resources, (2) optimizing internal processes, and (3) maintaining its boundary. The framework's central mechanism is "recursive realization": higher-order complexities (e.g., adaptive behavior, mind, institutions) are not emergent novelties but strategic solutions evolved to resolve escalating conflicts among these constraints in variable environments. This process is driven by system-environment conflict, follows a logic of dynamic multi-dimensional prioritization, and is governed by cost-benefit trade-offs. MCRR systematically derives a functional hierarchy from passive structures to institutionalized society, explaining increasing flexibility as a recursive response to more complex constraint conflicts. It integrates and extends insights from autopoiesis, life history theory, and active inference, positioning them within the broader narrative of constraint satisfaction. As a heuristic meta-framework, the MCRR provides novel and testable perspectives for cognitive neuroscience, computational psychiatry, AI, and social sciences, fostering interdisciplinary dialogue on adaptation, complexity, and the origins of intelligence and culture.
Understanding the continuity from physical and biological systems to the mind and society remains a fundamental scientific challenge, often hindered by disciplinary fragmentation. This paper proposes the Multi-level Constraint Recursive Realization (MCRR) framework to offer a unified, first-principles-based account of this continuity. Its core thesis is that any persistent dissipative structure must satisfy three irreducible meta-constraints: (1) acquiring resources, (2) optimizing internal processes, and (3) maintaining its boundary. The framework's central mechanism is "recursive realization": higher-order complexities (e.g., adaptive behavior, mind, institutions) are not emergent novelties but strategic solutions evolved to resolve escalating conflicts among these constraints in variable environments. This process is driven by system-environment conflict, follows a logic of dynamic multi-dimensional prioritization, and is governed by cost-benefit trade-offs. MCRR systematically derives a functional hierarchy from passive structures to institutionalized society, explaining increasing flexibility as a recursive response to more complex constraint conflicts. It integrates and extends insights from autopoiesis, life history theory, and active inference, positioning them within the broader narrative of constraint satisfaction. As a heuristic meta-framework, the MCRR provides novel and testable perspectives for cognitive neuroscience, computational psychiatry, AI, and social sciences, fostering interdisciplinary dialogue on adaptation, complexity, and the origins of intelligence and culture.
Posted: 13 January 2026
“What the Meta Is Going on?” A Scoping Review of the Different Methods and Methodology of Qualitative Synthesis
Andrew Soundy
Background: There is a proliferation of terms that are used to define and describe qualitative methods of review synthesis. These terms can make understanding which approach to use difficult and the ability to generate operational clarity challenging. This is particularly important for life-span mental health research and further research is required that exams and maps the terms and approaches to synthesis. Objective: This scoping review aims to map the landscape of qualitative synthesis methods, evaluate the ability to operationalise named methods, explore their philosophical foundations and methodological associations and consider the application within a specifically identified area of life-span mental health research. Methods: Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines a scoping review was undertaken. A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple databases and grey literature sources. Articles were included that examined a methodological approach to qualitative synthesis. Data extraction and charting focused on synthesis type, frameworks, philosophical alignment, and operational guidance. Results: Fifty-four articles were identified and within these 14 qualitative methodologies were identified and 5 types of aggregative methods and 10 types of interpretive methods of synthesis. Meta-ethnography, meta-synthesis, framework synthesis were the most frequently cited methodologies. A subset of these methodologies and methods were found to be the more operationalizable and these are discussed. Conclusion: The review highlights significant terminological and methodological fragmentation in qualitative synthesis. It underscores the need for clearer guidance, standardised terminology, and stronger links between synthesis methodologies, methods and philosophical traditions. A decision tree is proposed to support researchers in selecting appropriate synthesis methodologies.
Background: There is a proliferation of terms that are used to define and describe qualitative methods of review synthesis. These terms can make understanding which approach to use difficult and the ability to generate operational clarity challenging. This is particularly important for life-span mental health research and further research is required that exams and maps the terms and approaches to synthesis. Objective: This scoping review aims to map the landscape of qualitative synthesis methods, evaluate the ability to operationalise named methods, explore their philosophical foundations and methodological associations and consider the application within a specifically identified area of life-span mental health research. Methods: Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines a scoping review was undertaken. A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple databases and grey literature sources. Articles were included that examined a methodological approach to qualitative synthesis. Data extraction and charting focused on synthesis type, frameworks, philosophical alignment, and operational guidance. Results: Fifty-four articles were identified and within these 14 qualitative methodologies were identified and 5 types of aggregative methods and 10 types of interpretive methods of synthesis. Meta-ethnography, meta-synthesis, framework synthesis were the most frequently cited methodologies. A subset of these methodologies and methods were found to be the more operationalizable and these are discussed. Conclusion: The review highlights significant terminological and methodological fragmentation in qualitative synthesis. It underscores the need for clearer guidance, standardised terminology, and stronger links between synthesis methodologies, methods and philosophical traditions. A decision tree is proposed to support researchers in selecting appropriate synthesis methodologies.
Posted: 12 January 2026
Understanding Sorghum Farmer Typology in Sudan: A Data-Driven Lens to Scrutinize Agriculture and Rural Development
Haruna Sekabira
,Guy Simbeko
,Abraham Abatneh
,Samuel Cledon
This study aimed to develop a comprehensive typology of Sudanese sorghum-farming households within their food security status to inform targeted agricultural policy and rural development strategies. Using survey data from 392 households across 11 Sudanese states, the research captures the structural, socio-economic, and geographical diversity of farming systems and scrutinizes the relationship between socioeconomic characteristics of farmer households and related probability of constituting a specific farmer type. To assert this, Principal Component Analysis (PCA), hierarchical clustering, and Multinomial logistic regression analysis were applied. Through PCA and hierarchical clustering, three types of farmers were identified: The first type (Vulnerable Farmers), characterized by low education levels, small landholdings, high food insecurity, and reliance on subsistence farming; The second type (Well-off Remote farmers), operating larger landholdings meant for commercial purposes, yet facing challenges related to geographic isolation and limited market access; The third type (Educated Farmers with access to urban areas), consisting of households with higher education, diversified income sources, and proximity to markets, though still experiencing persistent food insecurity. Multinomial logistic regression analysis confirmed that household size, age, education, land size, market distance, and income structure are significant predictors of respective types of farmers. Thus, the study stands as a tool to enlighten intended/future policies, in providing input support and credit for vulnerable farmers, infrastructure and market access for remote commercial farmers, and land tenure security with innovative-geared incentives for farmers interacting with urban areas to foster inclusive, adaptive agricultural policies, and sustainable development across Sudan’s diverse farming communities.
This study aimed to develop a comprehensive typology of Sudanese sorghum-farming households within their food security status to inform targeted agricultural policy and rural development strategies. Using survey data from 392 households across 11 Sudanese states, the research captures the structural, socio-economic, and geographical diversity of farming systems and scrutinizes the relationship between socioeconomic characteristics of farmer households and related probability of constituting a specific farmer type. To assert this, Principal Component Analysis (PCA), hierarchical clustering, and Multinomial logistic regression analysis were applied. Through PCA and hierarchical clustering, three types of farmers were identified: The first type (Vulnerable Farmers), characterized by low education levels, small landholdings, high food insecurity, and reliance on subsistence farming; The second type (Well-off Remote farmers), operating larger landholdings meant for commercial purposes, yet facing challenges related to geographic isolation and limited market access; The third type (Educated Farmers with access to urban areas), consisting of households with higher education, diversified income sources, and proximity to markets, though still experiencing persistent food insecurity. Multinomial logistic regression analysis confirmed that household size, age, education, land size, market distance, and income structure are significant predictors of respective types of farmers. Thus, the study stands as a tool to enlighten intended/future policies, in providing input support and credit for vulnerable farmers, infrastructure and market access for remote commercial farmers, and land tenure security with innovative-geared incentives for farmers interacting with urban areas to foster inclusive, adaptive agricultural policies, and sustainable development across Sudan’s diverse farming communities.
Posted: 06 January 2026
Short-Run Monetary Policy Transmission, Credit Risk, and Bank Portfolio Adjustments: Evidence from the Non-Financial Corporate Sector in an Emerging Economy
Adil Boutfssi
,Tarik Quamar
Posted: 01 January 2026
Micro-Level Forces Shaping Macro-Technological Evolution in Complex Systems
Mario Coccia
Posted: 01 January 2026
An Empirical Analysis of Factors Influencing Customer Satisfaction Among Youth at Local Hipster Coffee Shops in Malaysia
Nik Noorhazila Nik Mud
,Mardhiah Kamaruddin
,Hazriah Hasan
Posted: 31 December 2025
The Impact of Financial Development on Economic Growth: A Case Study of Saudi Arabia
Abdelrahman Mohamed Mohamed Saeed
Posted: 29 December 2025
A Heuristic Evaluation of the Next Generation of AR Glasses Across Four Use Cases
Christina M. Frederick
,Barbara Chaparro
,Barbara Cazzolli
,Gabriel Fredrich
,Michelle Aros
,Henry Arnold
Posted: 25 December 2025
The Use of Faculty Inventor Social Capital to Facilitate University Technology Transfer: A Multiple Case Study Inquiry Using Qualitative Comparative Analysis
Malcolm Townes
Posted: 23 December 2025
Tracing Multiple Myeloma Across History: From Ancient Medicine to Modern Hematology and Medical Ethics
Guluzar Itez
Posted: 19 December 2025
The Eviction Cliff: Pandemic Moratoria, Structural Breaks, and Housing Vulnerability in Florida
Antoine Lovell
,Earl J. Edwards
,Jennifer R. Daniels
Posted: 04 December 2025
Remarkable Artifact Discoveries in Mexico
Alberto Donini
,Tomas Hrico
Posted: 03 December 2025
Impact of the Stress Suppression Processes and Counseling Strategies for Police Officers: A Qualitative Content Analysis
Wen-Ling Hung
Posted: 01 December 2025
Analysis of Bioregional Development Scenarios in Latvia
Daniela Klavina
,Liga Proskina
,Kaspars Naglis-Liepa
,Sallija Cerina
Posted: 27 November 2025
The Hidden Legal and Ethical Questions Behind Artificial Intelligence
Alia Hamdy
Posted: 27 November 2025
A Transdisciplinary Unified Framework for Civilization Evolution: The Cognition-Substitution-Intensification Spiral Model
Xinqi Zheng
,Haiyan Liu
Posted: 26 November 2025
Event Definition and Dimensional Entanglement for Composite Event Recognition
Xinqi Zheng
,Haiyan Liu
Posted: 26 November 2025
of 15