Sort by
Low-Load Blood Flow Restriction Training as an Effective Strategy for Improving Anaerobic Power in Young Men
Kyu-Seung Kim
,Gi Beom Kim
,Sunghoon Shin
Posted: 16 December 2025
Training Blindfolded in a Virtual Environment with a Moving Platform: No Within-Session Gains but Robust Long-Term Gains in Task-Specific Postural Stability
Orit Elion
,Itamar Sela
,Yotam Bahat
,Itzhak Siev-Ner
,Patrice L. Weiss
,Avi Karni
Posted: 15 December 2025
Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization for Middle-Aged Women With Frozen Shoulder: Clinical Effects on Pain and COP
Hyeon Ji Kim
,Il bong Park
,Hyun Ju Kim
,Chae Kwan Lee
Posted: 14 December 2025
Factors Associated with Urinary Incontinence in Female Weightlifters
Sofia Lopes
,Manon Becam
,Carla Pierrot
,Julie Réard
,Alice Carvalhais
,Ágata Vieira
,Gabriela Brochado
Background/Objectives: Urinary incontinence (UI) is common among women practicing sports, particularly those involving heavy lifting or high-impact movements that increase intra-abdominal pressure. UI can negatively affect social life, self-confidence, and motivation to remain active. This study aimed to examine the associations of sociodemographic, training-related, obstetric and surgical factors with UI in female weightlifters. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 84 French women regularly practicing weightlifting. Participants completed a sociodemographic and gynecological questionnaire, along with the Urinary Symptom Profile (USP). Data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U, Student’s t-test, Chi-square, and Fisher’s exact tests (95% confidence level). Results: Among participants (aged 15–49 years), 51 (60.7%) reported involuntary urine leakage, and 31 (36.9%) scored 1–3 on the USP stress incontinence subscale. Most participants were non-smokers (73.8%), with a median of 3.5 years of weightlifting experience, 4 weekly training sessions, and 6–7 competitions per year. No significant associations were found between UI and sociodemographic factors, obstetric history, previous surgeries, or training characteristics. Maximal lifts in Clean & Jerk and Snatch exercises were also similar between participants with and without UI. Slight trends suggested higher UI prevalence among women with vaginal deliveries, episiotomies, or vaginal lacerations. Conclusions: UI is common among female weightlifters, but in this study, was not associated with sociodemographic factors or weightlifting practices. These findings indicate that UI prevalence cannot be explained by the variables studied and highlight the need for further research into other potential contributing factors.
Background/Objectives: Urinary incontinence (UI) is common among women practicing sports, particularly those involving heavy lifting or high-impact movements that increase intra-abdominal pressure. UI can negatively affect social life, self-confidence, and motivation to remain active. This study aimed to examine the associations of sociodemographic, training-related, obstetric and surgical factors with UI in female weightlifters. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 84 French women regularly practicing weightlifting. Participants completed a sociodemographic and gynecological questionnaire, along with the Urinary Symptom Profile (USP). Data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U, Student’s t-test, Chi-square, and Fisher’s exact tests (95% confidence level). Results: Among participants (aged 15–49 years), 51 (60.7%) reported involuntary urine leakage, and 31 (36.9%) scored 1–3 on the USP stress incontinence subscale. Most participants were non-smokers (73.8%), with a median of 3.5 years of weightlifting experience, 4 weekly training sessions, and 6–7 competitions per year. No significant associations were found between UI and sociodemographic factors, obstetric history, previous surgeries, or training characteristics. Maximal lifts in Clean & Jerk and Snatch exercises were also similar between participants with and without UI. Slight trends suggested higher UI prevalence among women with vaginal deliveries, episiotomies, or vaginal lacerations. Conclusions: UI is common among female weightlifters, but in this study, was not associated with sociodemographic factors or weightlifting practices. These findings indicate that UI prevalence cannot be explained by the variables studied and highlight the need for further research into other potential contributing factors.
Posted: 09 December 2025
Ancient Heat vs. Modern Hands: Why Moxibustion May Revolutionize Physical Rehabilitation – Evidence from a Systematic Review
Maritina Koga
,Athanasios Fouras
,Marina Theodoritsi
,Dionysia Chrysanthakopoulou
,Constantinos Koutsojannis
Posted: 09 December 2025
Muscle Mass, Strength, and Power as Predictors of Falls among Active Community-Dwelling Older Adults
Priscila Marconcin
,Joana Serpa
,José Mira
,Ana Lúcia Silva
,Estela São Martinho
,Vânia Loureiro
,Margarida Gomes
,Petronela Hăisan
,Nuno Casanova
,Vanessa Santos
Posted: 08 December 2025
Exploring the Potential of Lee Silverman Voice Treatment BIG for Improving Balance and Gait in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis
Konstantinos Aloupis
,Theofani Bania
,Eftychia Trachani
,Elias Tsepis
,Antigoni Gotsopoulou
,Sofia Lampropoulou
Posted: 04 December 2025
Integrative Educational-Somatic Correlations in the Training Process Throughout University Studies, as Sustainable Perspectives
Dan Iulian Alexe
,Gabriel Mareș
,Elena Adelina Panaet
,Ilie Mihai
,Camelia Daniela Plastoi
,Cristina Ioana Alexe
Posted: 04 December 2025
Predictors of Suicide Attempt in Paediatric Patients with Non-Suicidal Self-Injury
Maria Cunha
,Oleksandr KRUPSKYI
Posted: 02 December 2025
From Lab to Studio: Implementing Markerless AI for Scalable ACL Prevention in Female Dancers
Anna Bourliou
,Athanasios Fouras
,Dionysia Chrysanthakopoulou
,Constantinos Koutsojannis
Background: Female dancers experience non-contact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries at rates comparable to high-risk contact sports, yet laboratory-based marker systems have remained inaccessible for routine screening. Objectives: To compare the accuracy, feasibility, and ACL-risk detection performance of AI-enhanced markerless versus marker-based motion analysis in female dancers. Methods: Following a prospectively registered protocol, we searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, IEEE Xplore, and dance-specific databases from 2015 to November 2025. Eligible studies performed direct head-to-head comparisons during dance-specific tasks (e.g., grand jeté, turnout plié, pointe relevé) in female dancers aged 10–30 years. Primary outcome: root-mean-square error (RMSE) for knee valgus angle. Risk of bias was assessed with ROBINS-I; evidence certainty with GRADE. Results: Twelve studies (n = 456 female dancers, mean age 18.2 years) were included. Markerless systems achieved a pooled RMSE of 2.9° (95% CI 2.1–3.7°, I2 = 48%, k = 8) for knee valgus during landings and turnout tasks, with a pooled sensitivity of 84% (95% CI 76–90%) for high-risk profiles. Setup time was reduced by 80–95% and cost by >99% compared with marker-based systems. Certainty of evidence was moderate for accuracy and low for sensitivity. Conclusion: AI-enhanced markerless motion analysis provides clinically acceptable accuracy and unprecedented feasibility for ACL-risk screening in female dancers. Integration into studio-based prevention programmes is now justified and urgently needed. Level of evidence: Level II (systematic review of Level I–II studies).
Background: Female dancers experience non-contact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries at rates comparable to high-risk contact sports, yet laboratory-based marker systems have remained inaccessible for routine screening. Objectives: To compare the accuracy, feasibility, and ACL-risk detection performance of AI-enhanced markerless versus marker-based motion analysis in female dancers. Methods: Following a prospectively registered protocol, we searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, IEEE Xplore, and dance-specific databases from 2015 to November 2025. Eligible studies performed direct head-to-head comparisons during dance-specific tasks (e.g., grand jeté, turnout plié, pointe relevé) in female dancers aged 10–30 years. Primary outcome: root-mean-square error (RMSE) for knee valgus angle. Risk of bias was assessed with ROBINS-I; evidence certainty with GRADE. Results: Twelve studies (n = 456 female dancers, mean age 18.2 years) were included. Markerless systems achieved a pooled RMSE of 2.9° (95% CI 2.1–3.7°, I2 = 48%, k = 8) for knee valgus during landings and turnout tasks, with a pooled sensitivity of 84% (95% CI 76–90%) for high-risk profiles. Setup time was reduced by 80–95% and cost by >99% compared with marker-based systems. Certainty of evidence was moderate for accuracy and low for sensitivity. Conclusion: AI-enhanced markerless motion analysis provides clinically acceptable accuracy and unprecedented feasibility for ACL-risk screening in female dancers. Integration into studio-based prevention programmes is now justified and urgently needed. Level of evidence: Level II (systematic review of Level I–II studies).
Posted: 28 November 2025
Development and Validation of the Low Sit–High Step Test for Assessing Lower Extremity Function in Sarcopenia
Serpil Demir
,Burak Elçin
,Ramazan Mert
,İbrahim Kök
,Ethem Kavukçu
,Nilüfer Balcı
Objective: The study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the newly developed Low Sit–High Step (LS-HS) Test designed to assess lower-extremity muscle strength in the diagnosis of sarcopenia. Design: The study included 205 participants divided into four groups (possible sarcopenia, sarcopenia, young control, and middle-to-older control). The LS-HS Test was compared across groups, and its ability to distinguish sarcopenia and possible sarcopenia was evaluated. Internal consistency, inter-rater and test–retest reliability, and diagnostic accuracy were assessed to determine the test’s validity and reliability. Results: LS-HS Test scores were higher in participants with possible sarcopenia and sarcopenia (p<0.05). Multinomial logistic regression analysis showed that LS-HS Test performance could predict both possible sarcopenia and sarcopenia (p<0.001). Internal consistency was excellent (Cronbach’s α = 0.938), while inter-rater and test–retest reliability were very high (ICC = 0.998), confirming its reproducibility. ROC analysis demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing both possible sarcopenia and sarcopenia (p<0.01, AUC=0.768, AUC=0.704). Conclusions: The LS-HS Test appears to be a valid, reliable, and practical tool for assessing lower-limb muscle strength and functional decline in the diagnosis of sarcopenia. Its simplicity and clinical applicability suggest that it may serve as a useful option for routine screening and evaluation.
Objective: The study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the newly developed Low Sit–High Step (LS-HS) Test designed to assess lower-extremity muscle strength in the diagnosis of sarcopenia. Design: The study included 205 participants divided into four groups (possible sarcopenia, sarcopenia, young control, and middle-to-older control). The LS-HS Test was compared across groups, and its ability to distinguish sarcopenia and possible sarcopenia was evaluated. Internal consistency, inter-rater and test–retest reliability, and diagnostic accuracy were assessed to determine the test’s validity and reliability. Results: LS-HS Test scores were higher in participants with possible sarcopenia and sarcopenia (p<0.05). Multinomial logistic regression analysis showed that LS-HS Test performance could predict both possible sarcopenia and sarcopenia (p<0.001). Internal consistency was excellent (Cronbach’s α = 0.938), while inter-rater and test–retest reliability were very high (ICC = 0.998), confirming its reproducibility. ROC analysis demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing both possible sarcopenia and sarcopenia (p<0.01, AUC=0.768, AUC=0.704). Conclusions: The LS-HS Test appears to be a valid, reliable, and practical tool for assessing lower-limb muscle strength and functional decline in the diagnosis of sarcopenia. Its simplicity and clinical applicability suggest that it may serve as a useful option for routine screening and evaluation.
Posted: 27 November 2025
Understanding Mind-Body Experience from the Perspective of Interoceptive Awareness: The Context of Breathing and Mandala Drawing Interventions
Zixi Liu
,Zhen Wu
,Jingchao Zeng
,Haosheng Ye
Posted: 27 November 2025
From Markers to Models: AI Motion Analysis for ACL Injury Prevention in Female Footballers
Vassia Vatsika
,Athanasios Fouras
,Marina Theodoritsi
,Dionysia Chrysanthakopoulou
,Constantinos Koutsojannis
Posted: 26 November 2025
Impact of Proximal Conjoint Tendon Injury on Return to Play in the BF–ST Complex: A Prospective MRI-Based Study
Makoto Wada
,Takumi Okunuki
,Takeshi Sugimoto
,Yasuhito Tanaka
,Tsukasa Kumai
Posted: 26 November 2025
Low Back Pain Characteristics Among Health Science Undergraduates: A Prospective Study for 2-Year Follow Up
Janan Abbas
,Saher Abu-Leil
,Katherin Joubran
Posted: 25 November 2025
Multiuser Exercise-Based Telerehabilitation Intervention for Older Adults with Frailty
Naoki Yamada
,Itsuki Sato
,Shoji Kinoshita
,Atsushi Muraji
,Seiki Tokunaga
,Taro Naka
,Ryo Okubo
Posted: 25 November 2025
Ethical Implications of Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Sports Injuries and Protecting Athlete Privacy
Mojtaba Ghorbani Asiabar
,Morteza Ghorbani Asiabar
,Alireza Ghorbani Asiabar
Posted: 24 November 2025
Associations Between Frailty, Body Mass Index, and Functional Fitness in Older Women
Cristian Luarte-Rocha
,Jorge Maluenda-Albornoz
,Nicolas Gómez-Álvarez
,Daniela Albers-Busquets
,Yazmina Pleticosic-Ramírez
,Lincoyán Fernández-Huerta
,Nicol Careaga-Romero
,Jocelyn Jofré-Fica
,Lorena Armijo- Weingart
,Kevin Campos-Campos
Posted: 20 November 2025
Effectiveness of an mHealth Exercise Program on Fall Incidence, Fall Risk, and Fear of Falling in Nursing Home Residents: The Cluster Randomized Controlled BeSt Age Trial
Jonathan Diener
,Jelena Krafft
,Sabine Rayling
,Janina Krell-Roesch
,Hagen Wäsche
,Anna Lena Flagmeier
,Alexander Woll
,Kathrin Wunsch
Posted: 19 November 2025
What to Know About Falls in Older Adults? Risk Factors, Predictors, and Therapeutic Interventions
Fernanda Bueno Pilastri
,Julia Fantim Lopes
,Eric Nkansah Boateng
,Nise Ribeiro Marques
Posted: 14 November 2025
of 30