Sort by
NornirNet: A Deep Learning Framework to Distinguish Benign from Malignant Type II Endoleaks Using Preoperative Imaging
Francesco Andreoli
,Fabio Mattiussi
,Elias Wasseh
,Andrea Leoncini
,Ludovica Ettorre
,Jacopo Galafassi
,Maria Antonella Ruffino
,Luca Giovannacci
,Alessandro Robaldo
,Giorgio Prouse
Posted: 02 December 2025
Preliminary Experience with Oxygen-Enriched Oleic Matrix Breast-Shaped Dressings in Oncoplastic Breast Surgery
Agostino Rodda
,Stefano Bottosso
,Andrea Lisa
,Nadia Renzi
,Elisa Bascialla
,Giulia Benedetta Sidoti
,Germana Lissidini
,Giovanni Papa
Posted: 01 December 2025
Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: A Review of the Surgical Techniques, Indications and Anatomical Considerations
Stylianos Kapetanakis
,Mikail Chatzivasiliadis
,Nikolaos Gkantsinikoudis
,Konstantinos Pazarlis
Posted: 19 November 2025
Resolution Comparison of a Standoff Gel Pad Versus a Liquid Gel Barrier for Nasal Bone Fracture Sonography: A Standardized Crossover Study
Dong Gyu Kim
,Kyung Ah Lee
Posted: 19 November 2025
The Usefulness of DEPAP Flap for Reconstructing Perineal Defect Caused by Fournier´s Gangrene: A Case Report
Dong Gyu Kim
,Kyung Ah Lee
Posted: 10 November 2025
Dual Tumor Pathogenesis in the Gastrointestinal Tract: Synchronous Rectal Schwannoma and Gallbladder Papillary Adenocarcinoma
Adrian Cotovanu
,Catalin Dumitru Cosma
,Calin Molnar
,Vlad Olimpiu Butiurca
,Marian Botoncea
Posted: 07 November 2025
Clinical Outcomes of Surgeon-Performed Laparoscopic-Guided Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: An Observational Study
Thawatchai Tullavardhana
Posted: 04 November 2025
Evaluating the Role of PhasixST™ Mesh in Laparoscopic Repair of Large Hiatal Hernias: Surgical Technique and Comprehensive Review of the Literature
Lazaros Kourtidis
,Katerina Neokleous
,Konstantina Spyridaki
,Dimitra Ntrikou
,Michail Lazaris
,Theodora Choratta
,Melina Papalexandraki
,Eleni Markaki
,Marilena Tsivgouli
,Athanasios Kalligas
+7 authors
Posted: 03 November 2025
Efficacy and Safety of Transvaginal Prolene Mesh–Augmented Rectocele Repair: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Guliz Avsar
,Yunus Emre Sacin
,Mustafa Ormeci
,Zeki Demirok
,Ozgur Dandin
Posted: 03 November 2025
SCOUT® Radar Reflector for Nonpalpable Breast Lesion Localization: Clinical Outcomes from a Single-Center Experience
Julieta Puente-Monserrat
,Ernesto Muñoz Sornosa
,Marcos Adrianzén-Vargas
,Vicente López-Flor
,Dixie Huntley-Pascual
,Georgy Kadzhaya-Klhystov
,Diego Soriano-Mena
,Elvira Buch-Villa
Posted: 30 October 2025
Artificial Intelligence and 3D Reconstruction in Complex Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) Surgery: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature
Andreas Panagakis
,Ioannis Katsaros
,Maria Sotiropoulou
,Adam Mylonakis
,Markos Despotidis
,Aris Sourgiadakis
,Panagiotis Sakarellos
,Stylianos Kapiris
,Chrysovalantis Vergadis
,Dimitrios Schizas
+2 authors
Posted: 29 October 2025
Frailty as a Predictor of Discharge Destination and Long-Term Function in Older Adults with Burn Injury
Vanessa Dellheim
,Elizabeth Perreault
,Pengsheng Ni
,Matthew Supple
,John Schulz
,Jeremy Goverman
Background: The older adult population is at increased risk for burn injury due to normal age-related physiological changes. This population experiences higher rates of mortality, increased length of stay, and greater complications compared to younger patients. The goal of this study was to examine how frailty impacts acute care discharge location and long-term functional outcomes following burn injury. Methods: A prospective study was performed at a single U.S. ABA-verified burn center. Patients >55 years old admitted from September 2019 to 2021 were enrolled. Patient and injury demographics, including the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), were collected. Discharge disposition was recorded. Long-term functional status was assessed via the Barthel Index and a functional questionnaire completed at 6 months to 1.5 years post-discharge. Results: Fifty patients were enrolled, with average age of 71 (SD 10.44) years and an average Total Body Surface Area (TBSA) of 7.44% (SD 13.22). Mean CFS score was 3.4 (SD 1.65). Patients discharged to a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) had significantly higher mean CFS scores (5.0, SD 0.94) compared to those discharged to Home (2.2, SD 1.2) or to Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) (3.0, SD 1.3), with a statistically significant difference across groups (F = 15.97; P < .0001). At follow-up, 90% (n=30) of patients returned to self-reported baseline and prior living environment. Conclusions: Frailty can be used as a predictor of discharge destination and outcomes in the older adult burn population. A higher CFS was associated with discharge to a higher level of care (SNF), even in patients who were younger and had a smaller TBSA compared to those discharging to IRF. The CFS can be a valuable tool for burn providers in prognostication, setting realistic expectations, and guiding discharge planning.
Background: The older adult population is at increased risk for burn injury due to normal age-related physiological changes. This population experiences higher rates of mortality, increased length of stay, and greater complications compared to younger patients. The goal of this study was to examine how frailty impacts acute care discharge location and long-term functional outcomes following burn injury. Methods: A prospective study was performed at a single U.S. ABA-verified burn center. Patients >55 years old admitted from September 2019 to 2021 were enrolled. Patient and injury demographics, including the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), were collected. Discharge disposition was recorded. Long-term functional status was assessed via the Barthel Index and a functional questionnaire completed at 6 months to 1.5 years post-discharge. Results: Fifty patients were enrolled, with average age of 71 (SD 10.44) years and an average Total Body Surface Area (TBSA) of 7.44% (SD 13.22). Mean CFS score was 3.4 (SD 1.65). Patients discharged to a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) had significantly higher mean CFS scores (5.0, SD 0.94) compared to those discharged to Home (2.2, SD 1.2) or to Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) (3.0, SD 1.3), with a statistically significant difference across groups (F = 15.97; P < .0001). At follow-up, 90% (n=30) of patients returned to self-reported baseline and prior living environment. Conclusions: Frailty can be used as a predictor of discharge destination and outcomes in the older adult burn population. A higher CFS was associated with discharge to a higher level of care (SNF), even in patients who were younger and had a smaller TBSA compared to those discharging to IRF. The CFS can be a valuable tool for burn providers in prognostication, setting realistic expectations, and guiding discharge planning.
Posted: 29 October 2025
Comparison of Total Corneal Tomographic Astigmatism with Predicted and OCT Measured Posterior Corneal Astigmatism in Toric IOL Calculations
Neel K. Patel
,Kenneth L. Cohen
Posted: 27 October 2025
Refining Surgical Standards: The Role of Robotic-Assisted Segmentectomy in Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Masaya Nishino
,Hideki Ujiie
,Masaoki Ito
,Hana Oiki
,Shota Fukuda
,Mai Nishina
,Shuta Ohara
,Akira Hamada
,Masato Chiba
,Toshiki Takemoto
+1 authors
Posted: 24 October 2025
Short- and Mid-Term Surgical Outcomes of Billroth I Versus Billroth II/Roux-en-Y Reconstruction: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study
Catalin Dumitru Cosma
,Vlad Olimpiu Butiurca
,Marian Botoncea
,Cosmin Nicolescu
,Russu Paul Cristian
,Călin Molnar
Background and Objectives: The best method for reconstructing the stomach after distal gastrectomy surgery in gastric cancer patients continues to be a subject of ongoing discussion. The most beneficial surgical option for patients is Billroth I (BI), yet surgeons may perform Billroth II and Roux-en-Y (BII/RY) procedures because they are easier to execute, although their impact on recovery complications and postoperative function remains unclear. This prospective observational cohort study compares the short- and mid-term surgical outcomes between BI and BII/RY reconstructions. Materials and Methods: We included 150 patients who received curative intent distal gastrectomy at the General Surgical Clinic of Emergency County Hospital in Târgu Mureș, Romania, between October 2021 and December 2024 (72 BI and 78 BII/RY patients), with a mean age of 61.5 ± 10.8 years (60.7% male). The outcomes included recovery parameters, postoperative complications (Clavien–Dindo), and mid-term functional results (PPI use, Los Angeles classification esophagitis, bile reflux gastritis, Sigstad dumping score). Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied to adjust for baseline covariates. Results: The results indicated that IPTW adjustment did not change the baseline demographics, tumor characteristics, or perioperative factors. The baseline characteristics were comparable between groups (p > 0.05). There were no significant differences in time to flatus (p = 0.12), oral diet (p = 0.70), or hospital stay (p = 0.69). Major morbidity (Clavien–Dindo ≥ III) occurred in 12.7% overall (p = 0.17), and the 90-day mortality was 5.3% (p = 1.00). At 6 months, bile reflux gastritis was more frequent after BII/RY (p = 0.16), whereas dumping syndrome occurred more often after BI (p = 0.16). Conclusions: The short-term surgical results together with the total postoperative complications showed no difference between the BI and BII/RY reconstruction methods. The study revealed distinct functional results between the two groups during the mid-term assessment, which demonstrates that surgeons should maintain their practice of choosing reconstruction techniques according to patient-specific requirements.
Background and Objectives: The best method for reconstructing the stomach after distal gastrectomy surgery in gastric cancer patients continues to be a subject of ongoing discussion. The most beneficial surgical option for patients is Billroth I (BI), yet surgeons may perform Billroth II and Roux-en-Y (BII/RY) procedures because they are easier to execute, although their impact on recovery complications and postoperative function remains unclear. This prospective observational cohort study compares the short- and mid-term surgical outcomes between BI and BII/RY reconstructions. Materials and Methods: We included 150 patients who received curative intent distal gastrectomy at the General Surgical Clinic of Emergency County Hospital in Târgu Mureș, Romania, between October 2021 and December 2024 (72 BI and 78 BII/RY patients), with a mean age of 61.5 ± 10.8 years (60.7% male). The outcomes included recovery parameters, postoperative complications (Clavien–Dindo), and mid-term functional results (PPI use, Los Angeles classification esophagitis, bile reflux gastritis, Sigstad dumping score). Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied to adjust for baseline covariates. Results: The results indicated that IPTW adjustment did not change the baseline demographics, tumor characteristics, or perioperative factors. The baseline characteristics were comparable between groups (p > 0.05). There were no significant differences in time to flatus (p = 0.12), oral diet (p = 0.70), or hospital stay (p = 0.69). Major morbidity (Clavien–Dindo ≥ III) occurred in 12.7% overall (p = 0.17), and the 90-day mortality was 5.3% (p = 1.00). At 6 months, bile reflux gastritis was more frequent after BII/RY (p = 0.16), whereas dumping syndrome occurred more often after BI (p = 0.16). Conclusions: The short-term surgical results together with the total postoperative complications showed no difference between the BI and BII/RY reconstruction methods. The study revealed distinct functional results between the two groups during the mid-term assessment, which demonstrates that surgeons should maintain their practice of choosing reconstruction techniques according to patient-specific requirements.
Posted: 22 October 2025
Comparative Outcomes of Pancreaticogastrostomy and Pancreaticojejunostomy Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Resectable Periampullary Tumors: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis
Septimiu Alex Moldovan
,Emil Ioan Moiș
,Florin Graur
,Vlad Ionuț Nechita
,Luminița Furcea
,Florin Zaharie
,Raluca Bodea
,Simona Mirel
,Mihaela Ştefana Moldovan
,Andreea Donca
+3 authors
Posted: 20 October 2025
An Innovative Ventral Hernia Repair – Use of Onlay Mesh with Antibiotic Beads in Suboptimal Operative Candidates with High-Risk Hernias
Fazal Khan
,Stephanie Heller
,Erica A Loomis
,Mariela Rivera
,Henry Schiller
Posted: 20 October 2025
Free Peritoneal Cancer Cells in Patients with Adenocarcinoma of The Stomach or Esophagogastric Junction: Risk Factors and Outcomes
Asada Methasate
,Akarawin Sirimongkol
,Chawisa Nampoolsuksan
,Jirawat Swangsri
,Thammawat Parakonthun
Background/Objectives: To identify independent predictors of free peritoneal cancer cells (FPCC), and to investigate survival outcomes relative to peritoneal cytology status among patients underwent intended curative gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma of stomach or esophagogastric junction. Methods: Medical record of patients underwent radical surgery during January 2005-December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical data and cytology results were evaluated. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of FPCC. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to estimate disease recurrence and survival outcomes. Results: Of the 349 enrolled patients, 188 (53.8%) had negative cytology, 32 (9.2%) had positive cytology, and 129 (36.9%) had atypical cells in peritoneal cytology. Multivariate analysis revealed poor differentiation (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.63, 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.04-6.82; p=0.015), pT4 (aOR: 4.62, 95%CI: 1.28-14.34; p=0.018), pN3 (aOR: 4.13, 95%CI: 1.14-15.03; p=0.031), and metastatic lymph node ratio >0.40 (aOR: 6.49, 95%CI: 1.44-29.14; p=0.015) as independent predictors of FPCC. Median survival duration of patients with negative, positive, and atypical cell cytology was 34.1, 13.1, and 28.7 months, respectively (p<0.001). 5-year OS was 27.2%, 8.3%, and 25.3%, respectively (p<0.001). 3-year DFS was 17.8%, 0.0%, and 17.4%, respectively (p<0.001). Median time to disease recurrence was 20.5, 4.9, and 11.3 months, respectively (p<0.001). Survival outcome and disease recurrence were comparable between atypical cell and negative peritoneal cytology patients. Conclusions: Poorly differentiated histology, pT4, pN3, and metastatic lymph node ratio >0.40 are independent predictors of FPCC. The presence of FPCC was significantly associated with poor survival and disease recurrence outcomes.
Background/Objectives: To identify independent predictors of free peritoneal cancer cells (FPCC), and to investigate survival outcomes relative to peritoneal cytology status among patients underwent intended curative gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma of stomach or esophagogastric junction. Methods: Medical record of patients underwent radical surgery during January 2005-December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical data and cytology results were evaluated. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of FPCC. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to estimate disease recurrence and survival outcomes. Results: Of the 349 enrolled patients, 188 (53.8%) had negative cytology, 32 (9.2%) had positive cytology, and 129 (36.9%) had atypical cells in peritoneal cytology. Multivariate analysis revealed poor differentiation (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.63, 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.04-6.82; p=0.015), pT4 (aOR: 4.62, 95%CI: 1.28-14.34; p=0.018), pN3 (aOR: 4.13, 95%CI: 1.14-15.03; p=0.031), and metastatic lymph node ratio >0.40 (aOR: 6.49, 95%CI: 1.44-29.14; p=0.015) as independent predictors of FPCC. Median survival duration of patients with negative, positive, and atypical cell cytology was 34.1, 13.1, and 28.7 months, respectively (p<0.001). 5-year OS was 27.2%, 8.3%, and 25.3%, respectively (p<0.001). 3-year DFS was 17.8%, 0.0%, and 17.4%, respectively (p<0.001). Median time to disease recurrence was 20.5, 4.9, and 11.3 months, respectively (p<0.001). Survival outcome and disease recurrence were comparable between atypical cell and negative peritoneal cytology patients. Conclusions: Poorly differentiated histology, pT4, pN3, and metastatic lymph node ratio >0.40 are independent predictors of FPCC. The presence of FPCC was significantly associated with poor survival and disease recurrence outcomes.
Posted: 16 October 2025
EITRA: A Novel Endoluminal Platform for Autonomous Bowel Resection – Technical Design and Preliminary Validation
Ashour Ghelichi
Posted: 07 October 2025
The Role of Standardised Technique in Colorectal Surgery: A 5-Year Comparative Analysis of Robotic vs. Laparoscopic Approaches
Upasana Das
,Yemi Akinyemi
,Ryan Hoyle
,Junaid Azad
,Haseeb Imtiaz
,Talha Tarrar
,Jamil Ahmed
Background and Aim: Standardisation is crucial for outcomes in minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Debate continues regarding the comparative efficacy of robotic versus laparoscopic platforms. This study evaluates perioperative outcomes for both approaches, performed by a single surgeon using an identical standardised technique to isolate the platform's effect. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 250 patients undergoing colorectal resection (2019-2023) was conducted. Patients were divided into laparoscopic (n=121) and robotic (n=129) groups. Data included demographics, ASA grade, conversion rates, operative times, Clavien-Dindo complications, resection margin status (R0/R1), mortality, and length of stay. R software was used for analysis. Results: Demographics were matched, but fewer high-risk (ASA III) patients were in the robotic cohort (38.7% vs. 51.3%; p<0.05). The robotic approach showed a significantly lower conversion rate (0% vs. 6.6%). A non-significant trend toward higher-grade complications existed in the laparoscopic group (median grade II vs. I; p=0.12), with a significantly higher R1 resection rate (n=8 vs. n=2). Laparoscopic 30-day (2 vs. 0) and 90-day (4 vs. 0) mortality was higher. Anastomotic leak rates (1.6% each) and median hospital stay (5 days; p=0.71) were similar in both groups. Conclusion: Using a standardised technique, outcomes are comparable except for a significantly reduced conversion rate with robotics. The observed difference in R1 resection rates may be influenced by baseline differences in patient populations. For skilled surgeons, the choice of platform may be influenced more by economic factors and preference than by major differences in clinical efficacy. What does this paper add to the literature? Debate continues regarding the comparative efficacy of robotic versus laparoscopic platforms. This single-surgeon study compares outcomes in colorectal cancer using minimally invasive procedures and a standardised technique. The result of similar clinical efficacy suggests that standardisation reduces outcome variability and demonstrates that cost and preference may influence platform choices more.
Background and Aim: Standardisation is crucial for outcomes in minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Debate continues regarding the comparative efficacy of robotic versus laparoscopic platforms. This study evaluates perioperative outcomes for both approaches, performed by a single surgeon using an identical standardised technique to isolate the platform's effect. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 250 patients undergoing colorectal resection (2019-2023) was conducted. Patients were divided into laparoscopic (n=121) and robotic (n=129) groups. Data included demographics, ASA grade, conversion rates, operative times, Clavien-Dindo complications, resection margin status (R0/R1), mortality, and length of stay. R software was used for analysis. Results: Demographics were matched, but fewer high-risk (ASA III) patients were in the robotic cohort (38.7% vs. 51.3%; p<0.05). The robotic approach showed a significantly lower conversion rate (0% vs. 6.6%). A non-significant trend toward higher-grade complications existed in the laparoscopic group (median grade II vs. I; p=0.12), with a significantly higher R1 resection rate (n=8 vs. n=2). Laparoscopic 30-day (2 vs. 0) and 90-day (4 vs. 0) mortality was higher. Anastomotic leak rates (1.6% each) and median hospital stay (5 days; p=0.71) were similar in both groups. Conclusion: Using a standardised technique, outcomes are comparable except for a significantly reduced conversion rate with robotics. The observed difference in R1 resection rates may be influenced by baseline differences in patient populations. For skilled surgeons, the choice of platform may be influenced more by economic factors and preference than by major differences in clinical efficacy. What does this paper add to the literature? Debate continues regarding the comparative efficacy of robotic versus laparoscopic platforms. This single-surgeon study compares outcomes in colorectal cancer using minimally invasive procedures and a standardised technique. The result of similar clinical efficacy suggests that standardisation reduces outcome variability and demonstrates that cost and preference may influence platform choices more.
Posted: 30 September 2025
of 25