Sort by
Assessing the Quality of Some Machine Translation Systems Using an Information-Theoretic RS-Method
Boris Ryabko
,Yeshewas Getachew Lulu
,Nadezhda Savina
,Yunfei Han
Posted: 28 August 2026
Demand-Side Flexibility for Community Benefits and Distribution Network Deferral: A Case Study of a New Zealand Island
Min Zhang
,Mark Apperley
,Shiliang Zhang
Posted: 28 August 2026
A Proof-of-Concept Pipeline Integrating Stanza, FP-Growth, and VOSviewer for Tracking Thematic Drift in Energy Security Publications (2022–2026)
Boris Chigarev
Posted: 26 August 2026
Personality-Adaptive Conversational AI for Emotional Support: A Simulation Study Integrating Big Five Detection with Zurich Model Regulation
Jiahua Duojie
,Samuel Devdas
,Mirjam Stieger
,Alexandre de Spindler
,Guang Lu
Posted: 21 August 2026
Fake Webometrics University Rankings: Network Expansion, Geo-IP Cloaking, and Institutional Vulnerabilities in the Global South
Vladimír M. Moskovkin
Posted: 18 August 2026
Semantic Digital Libraries in Public Administration: A Knowledge Graph and Linked Open Data Approach for Optimizing Certificate Request Management
Giovanni Carau
,Pasquale D'Avino
,Donatella Firmani
,Elio Gullo
,Luigi Laura
Posted: 12 August 2026
Quantum Strategies for Carbon Market Negotiation: An Institutional Filter Approach to the Prisoner's Dilemma
Samseer R. H.
,Asokan Vasudevan
,Sheiladevi Sukumaran
,Kalimbetov Xaliknazar
,Priyatharsini Rajandran
,Syaranya Devi Asokan
Posted: 11 August 2026
Industry 4.0: Organizational Readiness and Workforce Transformation With Policy, Regulation, and Governance Framework
Evans Achara
Posted: 10 August 2026
Skyline-Enhanced Bibliography Data Analysis
Leonidas Pispiringas
,Konstantinos Kelesidis
,Dimitris A. Dervos
,Georgios Evangelidis
Posted: 06 August 2026
Industry 4.0: Investigating the Impact of Organizational Culture on Digitalization Success for Enterprise Business Process
Evans Achara
Posted: 04 August 2026
The Crisis of Scholarly Communication in the Open Access Environment: Pathways to Diamond Open Access
Vladimir M. Moskovkin
Posted: 04 August 2026
A Design Science Study of Automated CVE Ingestion and Risk-Based Vulnerability Prioritization in Healthcare Cybersecurity
Carl L. Anderson
Posted: 03 August 2026
Trust-Based Decision Making: A Unified Dyadic and Collective Mathematical Framework
Harris Wang
Posted: 31 July 2026
A Hybrid Stanza–FP-Growth Approach to Terminological Pattern Recognition in Bibliometric Records on Energy Security Indicators
Boris Chigarev
Posted: 31 July 2026
Towards Electromagnetic-Field Physical AI for 6G: Concepts, Architecture, and Standardization
Yajun Zhao
,Mengnan Jian
,Yongpeng Wu
Posted: 30 July 2026
Rank, Fibers, and Falsifiability: A Rank-Aware Possibilistic Cramér–Rao Bound for Evidence-Driven Contraction
Moriba K. Jah
The Possibilistic Cramér–Rao Bound (PCRB) of the Theory of Epistemic Abductive Geometry (TEAG) floors the rate at which evidence may delete admissible microstates: \(H_π^{+} \geq H_π^{-} + \tfrac{n}{2}\log(1-I_k)\), with \(n\) the state dimension and \(I_k\) the Choquet information content of the observation. This paper corrects and strengthens the bound by exploiting a structural fact the earlier formulation ignored: possibilistic entropy lives on state space, but evidence deforms the impossibility field through the state-to-measurement map, which is not injective — many states produce the same evidence. For a measurement of rank m ≤ n, the surprisal field is the pullback of an \(m\)-dimensional field and is constant on the (n-m)-dimensional fibers of the measurement map. Three results follow. (1) Fiber conservation: a single observation leaves the fiber-direction geometry of every admissible \(\alpha\)-cut exactly invariant; the entire entropy change is the admissibility-integral of the log base-mass retained, an identity we prove by exact Fubini factorization. Ignorance is conserved along every direction the evidence cannot compare — the Principle of Comparative Information as a conservation law. (2) The rank-aware PCRB: under an explicit base-marginal coupling condition that formalizes the innovation–state isotropy assumption in its correct (\(m\)-dimensional) home, \(H_π^{+} \geq H_π^{-} + \tfrac{m}{2}\log(1-I_k)\) — a strictly stronger floor than the state-dimension version whenever \(m < n\), recovering it at full rank. (3) Falsifiability–observability: over \(\ell\) observations with dynamics, a direction of state space is falsifiable if and only if it lies in the accumulated pulled-back row space; the state is totally falsifiable if and only if the system is observable; and evidence-versus-evidence falsification — the detection of inconsistency, bias, and model stress through joint total falsification — is possible if and only if the stacked system is overdetermined, \(\ell m > n\) after accounting for rank. Consequences for the PCRB-admissible basin, for the ESPF reference implementation, and a falsifiable prediction about previously reported over-pruning in rank-deficient tracking are derived. Tightness of the corrected floor remains open and is inherited, not resolved, by the rank refinement.
The Possibilistic Cramér–Rao Bound (PCRB) of the Theory of Epistemic Abductive Geometry (TEAG) floors the rate at which evidence may delete admissible microstates: \(H_π^{+} \geq H_π^{-} + \tfrac{n}{2}\log(1-I_k)\), with \(n\) the state dimension and \(I_k\) the Choquet information content of the observation. This paper corrects and strengthens the bound by exploiting a structural fact the earlier formulation ignored: possibilistic entropy lives on state space, but evidence deforms the impossibility field through the state-to-measurement map, which is not injective — many states produce the same evidence. For a measurement of rank m ≤ n, the surprisal field is the pullback of an \(m\)-dimensional field and is constant on the (n-m)-dimensional fibers of the measurement map. Three results follow. (1) Fiber conservation: a single observation leaves the fiber-direction geometry of every admissible \(\alpha\)-cut exactly invariant; the entire entropy change is the admissibility-integral of the log base-mass retained, an identity we prove by exact Fubini factorization. Ignorance is conserved along every direction the evidence cannot compare — the Principle of Comparative Information as a conservation law. (2) The rank-aware PCRB: under an explicit base-marginal coupling condition that formalizes the innovation–state isotropy assumption in its correct (\(m\)-dimensional) home, \(H_π^{+} \geq H_π^{-} + \tfrac{m}{2}\log(1-I_k)\) — a strictly stronger floor than the state-dimension version whenever \(m < n\), recovering it at full rank. (3) Falsifiability–observability: over \(\ell\) observations with dynamics, a direction of state space is falsifiable if and only if it lies in the accumulated pulled-back row space; the state is totally falsifiable if and only if the system is observable; and evidence-versus-evidence falsification — the detection of inconsistency, bias, and model stress through joint total falsification — is possible if and only if the stacked system is overdetermined, \(\ell m > n\) after accounting for rank. Consequences for the PCRB-admissible basin, for the ESPF reference implementation, and a falsifiable prediction about previously reported over-pruning in rank-deficient tracking are derived. Tightness of the corrected floor remains open and is inherited, not resolved, by the rank refinement.
Posted: 29 July 2026
Theory of Epistemic Abductive Geometry (TEAG): A Unified Theory of Admissibility-Driven Inference Across Dynamical Systems, Measure Theory, and Language
Moriba Kemessia Jah
We introduce the Theory of Epistemic Abductive Geometry (TEAG), a framework for non-Bayesian inference grounded in admissible-support contraction under possibility theory. The central object is the TEAG quintuple \( \mathcal{E} = (H, \pi, \{H_\alpha\}_{\alpha\in(0,1]}, C, A) \), where evidence acts by contracting the geometry of admissible hypotheses rather than redistributing probabilistic belief mass. Falsification has two-stage structure. Under the log-admissibility transformation \( \Phi(h) = -\log\pi(h) \), the canonical TEAG conjunctive update becomes tropical addition in the max-plus semiring: \( \Phi^+(h) = \Phi^-(h) \oplus \psi(h) = \max\!\bigl(\Phi^-(h),\,\psi(h)\bigr), \) where \( \psi(h) = -\log\kappa(y\mid h) \) is the surprisal of hypothesis h under observation y. The tropical variety of this polynomial, \( \mathcal{B}_{\mathrm{active}} = \bigl\{h \in H : \Phi^-(h) = \psi(h)\bigr\}. \) is the active deformation front: the exact locus where incoming evidence first matches prior impossibility and begins to deform the posterior field. This is a necessary condition for falsification but not sufficient. Sufficient falsification requires exit from the PCRB admissible basin \( \mathcal{A}_k = \{h : \Phi^+_k(h) \leq c_k^\star\} \), where \( c_k^\star \) is the equipotential threshold determined by the PCRB at step k. Popper's criterion thus receives a two-stage algebraic formulation: the tropical variety marks where falsification becomes possible; the PCRB basin boundary marks where falsification is complete. Within the class of possibility-theoretic recursive inference systems, this is, to the best of our knowledge, the first exact formulation of this distinction. Main results. 1. Epistemic Contraction Theorem. Contraction is tropical addition: \( \Phi^+ = \Phi^- \oplus \psi \). Posterior α-cuts satisfy \( H_\alpha^+ = H_\alpha^- \cap E_\alpha(y) \): geometric intersection, not belief redistribution. The active deformation front is the tropical variety \( \mathcal{B}_{\mathrm{active}} \); the falsification boundary is the PCRB admissible basin boundary \( \mathcal{B}_{\mathrm{adm}} \). 2. Possibilistic Cramér–Rao Bound (PCRB} For any filter in the class \( \mathcal{F} \) of epistemically admissible, contraction-based recursive estimators satisfying Axioms 2.1–2.5: \( \mathcal{E}_{\pi,k|k} \geq \mathcal{E}_{\pi,k|k-1} + \tfrac{n}{2}\log(1-I_k) \), where \( I_k \) is the Choquet integral of per-hypothesis surprisal against the prior possibility capacity. Within this class, the ESPF [28] is the unique filter achieving this bound with equality, and is therefore the unique minimax-entropy-optimal set-based recursive estimator under bounded epistemic uncertainty. 3. Tropical Hamilton–Jacobi structure (summary). The TEAG update is structurally consistent with a tropical Lagrangian \( L = T - V \), Legendre transform to a tropical Hamiltonian equal to the surprisal field, and a Hamilton–Jacobi equation whose solution is the tropical addition rule. The Euler–Lagrange equations on the epistemic manifold yield geodesic motion with explicit Levi–Civita connection and Christoffel symbols. This structure is interpretive and consistent with the axioms; full derivations are in the companion paper [31]. Taken together, this structure admits a precise interpretation: the TEAG update rule is a max-plus dynamical system whose governing equations have the same algebraic form as the Hamilton–Jacobi equations of classical mechanics, instantiated on hypothesis space rather than physical space. 4. Gaussian collapse. Probability theory is the collapse limit of TEAG as epistemic width \( W \to 0 \): Choquet converges to Lebesgue, the ESPF recovers the Kalman filter, and \( \mathcal{E}_\pi \to \tfrac{1}{2}\log\det\Sigma + \mathrm{const}(n) \). Probability is earned by evidence, not assumed. Epistemic neutrality and knowledge-system synthesis. Because TEAG's axioms require only a hypothesis space, a possibility field, and a contraction operator — not a probability measure, a likelihood function, or a frequentist grounding — heterogeneous knowledge systems can each instantiate the TEAG quintuple independently. Their joint admissible support intersection is the locus of coherence: the set of hypotheses neither system has falsified. No transformation of one system into the other's representational primitives is required. The composition theory (Section 6) formalizes the coupling architecture. Four instantiations provide the unifying structure: the ESPF [28] for recursive state estimation; the Geometry of Knowing [29] for measure-theoretic collapse; the minimax-entropy optimality proof [30]; and the Possibilistic Language Model (PLM, forthcoming [32]).
We introduce the Theory of Epistemic Abductive Geometry (TEAG), a framework for non-Bayesian inference grounded in admissible-support contraction under possibility theory. The central object is the TEAG quintuple \( \mathcal{E} = (H, \pi, \{H_\alpha\}_{\alpha\in(0,1]}, C, A) \), where evidence acts by contracting the geometry of admissible hypotheses rather than redistributing probabilistic belief mass. Falsification has two-stage structure. Under the log-admissibility transformation \( \Phi(h) = -\log\pi(h) \), the canonical TEAG conjunctive update becomes tropical addition in the max-plus semiring: \( \Phi^+(h) = \Phi^-(h) \oplus \psi(h) = \max\!\bigl(\Phi^-(h),\,\psi(h)\bigr), \) where \( \psi(h) = -\log\kappa(y\mid h) \) is the surprisal of hypothesis h under observation y. The tropical variety of this polynomial, \( \mathcal{B}_{\mathrm{active}} = \bigl\{h \in H : \Phi^-(h) = \psi(h)\bigr\}. \) is the active deformation front: the exact locus where incoming evidence first matches prior impossibility and begins to deform the posterior field. This is a necessary condition for falsification but not sufficient. Sufficient falsification requires exit from the PCRB admissible basin \( \mathcal{A}_k = \{h : \Phi^+_k(h) \leq c_k^\star\} \), where \( c_k^\star \) is the equipotential threshold determined by the PCRB at step k. Popper's criterion thus receives a two-stage algebraic formulation: the tropical variety marks where falsification becomes possible; the PCRB basin boundary marks where falsification is complete. Within the class of possibility-theoretic recursive inference systems, this is, to the best of our knowledge, the first exact formulation of this distinction. Main results. 1. Epistemic Contraction Theorem. Contraction is tropical addition: \( \Phi^+ = \Phi^- \oplus \psi \). Posterior α-cuts satisfy \( H_\alpha^+ = H_\alpha^- \cap E_\alpha(y) \): geometric intersection, not belief redistribution. The active deformation front is the tropical variety \( \mathcal{B}_{\mathrm{active}} \); the falsification boundary is the PCRB admissible basin boundary \( \mathcal{B}_{\mathrm{adm}} \). 2. Possibilistic Cramér–Rao Bound (PCRB} For any filter in the class \( \mathcal{F} \) of epistemically admissible, contraction-based recursive estimators satisfying Axioms 2.1–2.5: \( \mathcal{E}_{\pi,k|k} \geq \mathcal{E}_{\pi,k|k-1} + \tfrac{n}{2}\log(1-I_k) \), where \( I_k \) is the Choquet integral of per-hypothesis surprisal against the prior possibility capacity. Within this class, the ESPF [28] is the unique filter achieving this bound with equality, and is therefore the unique minimax-entropy-optimal set-based recursive estimator under bounded epistemic uncertainty. 3. Tropical Hamilton–Jacobi structure (summary). The TEAG update is structurally consistent with a tropical Lagrangian \( L = T - V \), Legendre transform to a tropical Hamiltonian equal to the surprisal field, and a Hamilton–Jacobi equation whose solution is the tropical addition rule. The Euler–Lagrange equations on the epistemic manifold yield geodesic motion with explicit Levi–Civita connection and Christoffel symbols. This structure is interpretive and consistent with the axioms; full derivations are in the companion paper [31]. Taken together, this structure admits a precise interpretation: the TEAG update rule is a max-plus dynamical system whose governing equations have the same algebraic form as the Hamilton–Jacobi equations of classical mechanics, instantiated on hypothesis space rather than physical space. 4. Gaussian collapse. Probability theory is the collapse limit of TEAG as epistemic width \( W \to 0 \): Choquet converges to Lebesgue, the ESPF recovers the Kalman filter, and \( \mathcal{E}_\pi \to \tfrac{1}{2}\log\det\Sigma + \mathrm{const}(n) \). Probability is earned by evidence, not assumed. Epistemic neutrality and knowledge-system synthesis. Because TEAG's axioms require only a hypothesis space, a possibility field, and a contraction operator — not a probability measure, a likelihood function, or a frequentist grounding — heterogeneous knowledge systems can each instantiate the TEAG quintuple independently. Their joint admissible support intersection is the locus of coherence: the set of hypotheses neither system has falsified. No transformation of one system into the other's representational primitives is required. The composition theory (Section 6) formalizes the coupling architecture. Four instantiations provide the unifying structure: the ESPF [28] for recursive state estimation; the Geometry of Knowing [29] for measure-theoretic collapse; the minimax-entropy optimality proof [30]; and the Possibilistic Language Model (PLM, forthcoming [32]).
Posted: 27 July 2026
Integrating TOGAF ADM, ArchiMate, and Scrum to Align Enterprise Architecture with Agile Software Delivery: A Case Study of a Digital Learning SME
Miroslav Reiter
Posted: 24 July 2026
Bibliometric Analysis of Multi-Source Fault and Anomaly Isolation Research: Opportunities and Limitations of OpenAlex Metadata
Boris Chigarev
Posted: 21 July 2026
A Reproducible Safety-Aware ESP32-Based Quadrotor Testbed for Low-Altitude Autonomous Mobility: System Architecture, Blackbox Diagnostics, and Indoor Validation
Shih-Ming Cho
,Chia-Ping Huang
,Huan-Jung Lin
,Sung-Wen Wang
Posted: 13 July 2026
of 40