Sort by
Fiducia Supplicans: Eulogeo or Makarizo: St Luke Explains – A Treatise on Protean Blessings of the Blessed Virgin Mary
Chika Edward Uzoigwe
Posted: 05 January 2026
Autoapodixis: Proof of God – God Proves His Own Existence
Chika Uzoigwe
Posted: 29 December 2025
Biblical Proof of the Immaculate Conception and Perpetual Sinlessness of Mary—The Riddle: John and the Least in the Kingdom: The Solution: The Immaculate Conception
Chika Edward Uzoigwe
One of the most numinous expressions in the gospel is the assertion by Jesus in Matthew 11:11 that amongst those born of women, none is greater than John the Baptist and yet the least in the kingdom is greater than John the Baptist. We show here that the obstacle to understanding the statement lies in the misconception that it is as a monovalent statement of fact rather than in actuality a riddle; the solution to which expresses multivalent realities. In form, Jesus employs the same lexical bauplan of the conundrum couplet as Sampson in his infamous riddle in Judges 14:14. We show that Jesus consistently phrases paedagogic riddles in this guise. The use of the phrase “of women born” to describe the pool of comparators necessarily includes Jesus and his mother, Mary. Hence continent in the riddle are two elements. Firstly is the question as to how John can be greater than Jesus or Mary. Since Jesus is making a comparison between those inside and outside of the Kingdom, the only possible solution to this moiety of the riddle is that Jesus and Mary are within the Kingdom. This re-affirms the Kingship of Jesus and Queenship of the Mary. By definition the King must be in the Kingdom. However it is the second limb that is even more instructive. The second question is why John is not in the Kingdom. Baptism is the means to enter the Kingdom. As Jesus himself confirms to Nicodemus in John 3:5, one must be baptised by Water and the Holy Spirit. St Thomas Aquinas explains that this is the means of removing the obstacles to the Kingdom. He adumbrates the Catholic Catechism. Both disclose the reality that original sin and personal sin are obstacles to entry into the Kingdom. Some traditions assert John the Baptist was “baptised” during the Visitation, but their remains, nonetheless, the impediment of personal sin. The only possible sequitur is that if Mary is in the Kingdom, before Jesus’ sacrifice and resurrection, she must have been born without original sin and must never have sinned, via the grace of God. The only other alternative is that she is outside of the Kingdom and not of equivalent greatness to John the Baptist, who said of himself he was not fit to untie of sandals of Jesus; but we must conclude is greater than she who was chosen to carry and nurture Jesus himself. This contradiction must be rejected. This puzzle, which compares of all those born of women, John the Baptist and those in the Kingdom, is in some ways a prolegomenon or pre-articulation of the words of our Lady to Saint Bernadette at Lourdes in 1858 that she is the Immaculate Conception and pre-affirmation of the dogma of the Catholic Church in 1854.
One of the most numinous expressions in the gospel is the assertion by Jesus in Matthew 11:11 that amongst those born of women, none is greater than John the Baptist and yet the least in the kingdom is greater than John the Baptist. We show here that the obstacle to understanding the statement lies in the misconception that it is as a monovalent statement of fact rather than in actuality a riddle; the solution to which expresses multivalent realities. In form, Jesus employs the same lexical bauplan of the conundrum couplet as Sampson in his infamous riddle in Judges 14:14. We show that Jesus consistently phrases paedagogic riddles in this guise. The use of the phrase “of women born” to describe the pool of comparators necessarily includes Jesus and his mother, Mary. Hence continent in the riddle are two elements. Firstly is the question as to how John can be greater than Jesus or Mary. Since Jesus is making a comparison between those inside and outside of the Kingdom, the only possible solution to this moiety of the riddle is that Jesus and Mary are within the Kingdom. This re-affirms the Kingship of Jesus and Queenship of the Mary. By definition the King must be in the Kingdom. However it is the second limb that is even more instructive. The second question is why John is not in the Kingdom. Baptism is the means to enter the Kingdom. As Jesus himself confirms to Nicodemus in John 3:5, one must be baptised by Water and the Holy Spirit. St Thomas Aquinas explains that this is the means of removing the obstacles to the Kingdom. He adumbrates the Catholic Catechism. Both disclose the reality that original sin and personal sin are obstacles to entry into the Kingdom. Some traditions assert John the Baptist was “baptised” during the Visitation, but their remains, nonetheless, the impediment of personal sin. The only possible sequitur is that if Mary is in the Kingdom, before Jesus’ sacrifice and resurrection, she must have been born without original sin and must never have sinned, via the grace of God. The only other alternative is that she is outside of the Kingdom and not of equivalent greatness to John the Baptist, who said of himself he was not fit to untie of sandals of Jesus; but we must conclude is greater than she who was chosen to carry and nurture Jesus himself. This contradiction must be rejected. This puzzle, which compares of all those born of women, John the Baptist and those in the Kingdom, is in some ways a prolegomenon or pre-articulation of the words of our Lady to Saint Bernadette at Lourdes in 1858 that she is the Immaculate Conception and pre-affirmation of the dogma of the Catholic Church in 1854.
Posted: 24 December 2025
Why Humanity Overlooks Prophets - Canonical Recognition and Expectation Drift in Abrahamic Traditions
Michael Cody
Posted: 24 December 2025
Toward a Qur’anic Theory of Qibla: Reassessing Sacred Direction Through Mixed-Methods Analysis
Kazi Abdul Mannan
Posted: 15 December 2025
The Spiritual Architecture of Post-GDP Societies: Ubuntu, Christian Theology, Buen Vivir, and Indigenous Cosmologies
Pitshou Moleka
Posted: 09 December 2025
Reassessing the Masjid al-Haram: A Quranic Multidimensional Analysis of Sacred Geography
Kazi Abdul Mannan
Posted: 09 December 2025
Natural Metaphors: Expressions of Mystical Experience in John of the Cross, Etty Hillesum, and Björk
Anderson Fabián Santos Meza
Posted: 27 November 2025
Qur’anic Research Methodology: Deriving the Process of Knowledge from the Qur’an
Kazi Abdul Mannan
,Khandaker Mursheda Farhana
Posted: 13 November 2025
According to the Qur’an and the Gospels: The Death, Ascension, and Second Coming of Jesus (PBUH)
Abdullah Yekta
This study examines the Qur’ānic and Gospel accounts of Jesus’ (ʿĪsā’s) birth, life, death, and ascension, with a focus on the theological question of his supposed bodily return (nuzūl al-Masīḥ) before the Day of Resurrection. Its purpose is to determine whether the Muslim understanding of Jesus—shaped largely by narrations on the signs of the Hour—aligns with the Qur’ān. Methodologically, it engages in comparative textual analysis of Gospel narratives, Qur’ānic verses, classical and modern exegetical interpretations, and relevant ḥadīth reports. The paper first outlines the diverse and often contradictory Gospel accounts of the crucifixion, burial, resurrection, and ascension, noting their differences in sequence and detail. It then examines Qur’ānic verses employing the terms tawaffī and rafʿ, assessing classical exegetical views that affirm Jesus’ bodily ascension and modern interpretations that reject it, arguing instead for spiritual exaltation and death like other prophets. Special attention is paid to the reliability of āḥād reports on the nuzūl, their isnād weaknesses, and their tension with explicit Qur’ānic statements about the suddenness of the Hour, the universality of death, and the finality of prophethood. The study concludes that the Qur’ān contains no explicit statement supporting Jesus’ bodily ascension or pre-Resurrection return; such beliefs are rooted in Christian theology and later Muslim narrations, not in definitive Qur’ānic proof. Therefore, building a belief based on non-mutawātir hadith reports is not sound from the perspective of kalām methodology; rejecting the nuzūl view likewise cannot justly be equated with modernism or sectarian deviation.
This study examines the Qur’ānic and Gospel accounts of Jesus’ (ʿĪsā’s) birth, life, death, and ascension, with a focus on the theological question of his supposed bodily return (nuzūl al-Masīḥ) before the Day of Resurrection. Its purpose is to determine whether the Muslim understanding of Jesus—shaped largely by narrations on the signs of the Hour—aligns with the Qur’ān. Methodologically, it engages in comparative textual analysis of Gospel narratives, Qur’ānic verses, classical and modern exegetical interpretations, and relevant ḥadīth reports. The paper first outlines the diverse and often contradictory Gospel accounts of the crucifixion, burial, resurrection, and ascension, noting their differences in sequence and detail. It then examines Qur’ānic verses employing the terms tawaffī and rafʿ, assessing classical exegetical views that affirm Jesus’ bodily ascension and modern interpretations that reject it, arguing instead for spiritual exaltation and death like other prophets. Special attention is paid to the reliability of āḥād reports on the nuzūl, their isnād weaknesses, and their tension with explicit Qur’ānic statements about the suddenness of the Hour, the universality of death, and the finality of prophethood. The study concludes that the Qur’ān contains no explicit statement supporting Jesus’ bodily ascension or pre-Resurrection return; such beliefs are rooted in Christian theology and later Muslim narrations, not in definitive Qur’ānic proof. Therefore, building a belief based on non-mutawātir hadith reports is not sound from the perspective of kalām methodology; rejecting the nuzūl view likewise cannot justly be equated with modernism or sectarian deviation.
Posted: 13 November 2025
The Holy Land in the Holy Quran: A Combined Content Analysis of the Holy Quranic Verses and Theological Perspectives
Kazi Abdul Mannan
Posted: 04 November 2025
Mount Hermon and the Beqaa Valley: Tracing Sacred Names, Memory, and a Fading Landscape
Kazi Abdul Mannan
,Farhana Khandaker Mursheda
Posted: 14 October 2025
Evangelicals and the Creationist God: An Examination of Brazilian Creationism as an Educational and Political Problem
Henrique Mata de Vasconcelos
Posted: 06 August 2025
A Preliminary Study on Taoist Hermits in Contemporary China: From the Perspectives of Literary Works and We-Media
Saiping An
,Yingxu Liu
Posted: 09 July 2025
The Fractured Name: Lurianic Kabbalah and the Esoteric Grammar of the Tetragrammaton
Roberto Riva
Posted: 07 July 2025
The Islamization of Mathematics: A Philosophical and Pedagogical Inquiry
Ismail A Mageed
Posted: 30 June 2025
US Missionaries, Christian Zionism in Abya Yala, and Latin American Liberation Theology
Anderson Fabián Santos Meza
,Hugo Córdova Quero
Posted: 18 June 2025
Connected Heresy the Talmudic Literature’s Heretic Religiosity
Menachem Fisch
Posted: 23 May 2025
The Task of an Archaeo-Genealogy of Theological Knowledge: Between Self-Referentiality and Public Theology
Alex Villas Boas
,César Candiotto
Posted: 08 May 2025
Exploring Four Block-Printed Indic Script Mahāpratisarā Dhāraṇī (Chinese: 大隨求陀羅尼) Amulets Discovered in China
Yuling Wu
Posted: 29 April 2025
of 6