Submitted:
24 October 2025
Posted:
13 November 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
This study examines the Qur’ānic and Gospel accounts of Jesus’ (ʿĪsā’s) birth, life, death, and ascension, with a focus on the theological question of his supposed bodily return (nuzūl al-Masīḥ) before the Day of Resurrection. Its purpose is to determine whether the Muslim understanding of Jesus—shaped largely by narrations on the signs of the Hour—aligns with the Qur’ān. Methodologically, it engages in comparative textual analysis of Gospel narratives, Qur’ānic verses, classical and modern exegetical interpretations, and relevant ḥadīth reports. The paper first outlines the diverse and often contradictory Gospel accounts of the crucifixion, burial, resurrection, and ascension, noting their differences in sequence and detail. It then examines Qur’ānic verses employing the terms tawaffī and rafʿ, assessing classical exegetical views that affirm Jesus’ bodily ascension and modern interpretations that reject it, arguing instead for spiritual exaltation and death like other prophets. Special attention is paid to the reliability of āḥād reports on the nuzūl, their isnād weaknesses, and their tension with explicit Qur’ānic statements about the suddenness of the Hour, the universality of death, and the finality of prophethood. The study concludes that the Qur’ān contains no explicit statement supporting Jesus’ bodily ascension or pre-Resurrection return; such beliefs are rooted in Christian theology and later Muslim narrations, not in definitive Qur’ānic proof. Therefore, building a belief based on non-mutawātir hadith reports is not sound from the perspective of kalām methodology; rejecting the nuzūl view likewise cannot justly be equated with modernism or sectarian deviation.
Keywords:
Introduction
1. The Name of Jesus (ʿĪsā)
2. The Life of Jesus (ʿĪsā)
3. Hz. Îsâ’nın Ölümü
3.1. İncillere Göre Hz. Îsâ’nın Çarmıha Gerilmesi ve Ölümü
3.1.2. The Resurrection of Jesus (PBUH) According to the Gospels
The Resurrection of Jesus (PBUH) According to Matthew
The Resurrection of Jesus (PBUH) According to Markos
The Resurrection of Jesus (PBUH) According to Luke
The Resurrection of Jesus (PBUH) According to Yuhanna
| Aspect | Gospel of Matthew | Gospel of Mark | Gospel of Luke | Gospel of John |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Who visits the tomb? | Mary Magdalene & “the other Mary” | Mary Magdalene, Mary mother of James, and Salome | Mary Magdalene, Joanna, Mary mother of James, “and the others with them” | Mary Magdalene (initially alone) |
| Time of visit | At dawn | Very early, at sunrise | Very early in the morning | Early, while it was still dark |
| Status of the stone | Angel descends, causes earthquake, rolls stone back | They see the stone | Status of the stone | Angel descends, causes earthquake, rolls stone back |
| Figure(s) at the tomb | One angel (sitting on the stone outside) | One young man (inside, dressed in white) | Two men in clothes that gleamed like lightning | Two angels (after Peter & John leave, sitting where Jesus had lain) |
| Key Message | “He has risen... go to Galilee; there you will see him.” | “He has risen!... He is going ahead of you into Galilee.” | “Why do you look for the living among the dead?” | “Woman, why are you crying?... Who is it you are looking for?” (Asked by Jesus himself) |
| First Appearance | Jesus meets the women on their way back from the tomb | (The ‘Longer Ending’ adds appearances, but the original text ends at 16:8) | Jesus appears to two disciples on the road to Emmaus | Jesus appears to Mary Magdalene at the tomb |
4. The Death of Jesus (PBUH) and His Return to Earth According to Islam
| Aspect | Position A: Bodily Preservation & Corporeal Return | Position B: Completion of Mission & Spiritual Exaltation |
|---|---|---|
| Core Thesis | God miraculously intervened to suspend death for Jesus, raising him bodily to a state of suspension. He will return physically to complete a specific eschatological role before tasting death. | God fulfilled His promise to Jesus by granting him a natural death, saving him from his enemies. His exaltation was spiritual, and his prophethood concluded within his own time. |
| Status of Jesus (PBUH) | Alive in a bodily form within a metaphysical realm (e.g., the “second heaven” or a state of barzakh). | Deceased, like all other prophets. His soul is exalted with God, awaiting resurrection. |
| Interpretation of Tawaffī (توفية) |
Lexical: To take in full, to receive completely. Technical: God took him—soul and body—without the event of biological death occurring. Often interpreted as a type of “sleep” (wafāt al-nawm). |
Lexical: To complete, to take the full measure of something (i.e., a lifespan). Technical: To cause to die. The term is used in its primary Qur’anic sense of physical death (e.g., 39:42). The past-tense verb in 5:117 is decisive. |
| Interpretation of Rafʿ (رفع) | Literal-Spatial: A physical ascension from earth to heaven. A miraculous event altering the laws of nature. | Metaphorical-Honorific: An elevation in rank, status, and proximity to God. Analogous to the raising of Idris (19:57) or the station of martyrs (3:169). Denies a physical journey. |
| Hermeneutical Priority | Harmonization: Qur’anic verses are interpreted in light of the āḥād hadith tradition on the Nuzūl. The hadith provide the decisive context (asbāb al-nuzūl) for the verses. | Qur’anic Primacy: The apparent (ẓāhir) and consistent meaning of the Qur’an is established first. Āḥād reports that contradict these established principles are critically re-evaluated or rejected. |
| View on Eschatological Descent (Nuzūl) | A foundational article of faith. A literal, bodily return to kill the Dajjāl, break the cross, and establish justice under Islamic law. | A belief rooted in Judeo-Christian apocalypticism and non-definitive (ẓannī) narrations. It is theologically problematic and unsupported by the Qur’an’s definitive teachings. |
| Key Theological Challenges Addressed |
Problem: How to reconcile with the universality of death? Response: It is a specific divine exception, like the sleep of the Companions of the Cave. |
Problem: How to reconcile with the finality of prophethood? Response: A return would either break the seal of prophethood or necessitate the demotion of a prophet, both untenable. |
| Proponents | The majority classical (jumhūr) position of Ahl al-Sunnah, Salafiyyah, and Shīʿa scholarship. | Classical outliers (e.g., some Mu’tazila), Modern Reformists (e.g., Rashīd Riḍā, Maḥmūd Shaltūt), and contemporary critical scholars. |
4.1. The Crucifixion and Ascension of Jesus (PBUH) According to the Qur’an
4.1.2. The Death and Ascension of Jesus According to the Exegetes
| Qur’anic Term & Verse | Primary Interpretation (Bodily Ascension View) | Alternative Interpretation (Spiritual Exaltation View) | Key Proponents (as cited in the paper) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
إِنِّي مُتَوَفِّيكَ (innī mutawaffīka) Āl ʿImrān 3:55 |
To take/cause to die in the sense of sleep (wafāt al-nawm), or to take fully (soul and body) without the experience of death. | To cause to die a natural, physical death. |
Bodily: Al-Ṭabarī, Ibn Kathīr, Al-Rāzī, Al-Zamakhsharī Spiritual: Al-Māturīdī, Rashīd Riḍā, Ibn ʿĀshūr |
|
رَافِعُكَ إِلَيَّ (rāfiʿuka ilayya) Āl ʿImrān 3:55 |
To physically raise/ascend Jesus’s living body to heaven/the divine presence. | To elevate in rank and status; to honor the soul after death. A spiritual, not spatial, elevation. |
Bodily: Al-Ṭabarī, Al-Rāzī Spiritual: Al-Māturīdī, Rashīd Riḍā, Modern scholars |
|
بَل رَفَعَهُ اللَّهُ إِلَيْهِ (bal rafaʿahu Allāhu ilayhi) An-Nisā 4:158 |
Confirmation of a physical ascension, saving Jesus from crucifixion. | Confirmation of spiritual exaltation after God caused him to die, saving him from the plot. |
Bodily: Majority Classical Tafsīr Spiritual: Modern Critical Tafsīr |
4.1.3. Qur’ānic Evidences Cited for the Rejection of Jesus’s Return to Earth
| Aspect of Nuzūl Narratives | Contradictions & Issues | Theological Conflict with Qur’anic Principles |
|---|---|---|
| Place of Descent | White Minaret of Damascus vs. A bridge upon the clouds. | - |
| Duration of Stay | 7 years vs. 24 years vs. 40 years. | Implicitly appoints a time for the Hour (if he dies, then Resurrection comes). |
| Final Resting Place | Buried in Medina vs. Buried in Jerusalem. | - |
| Nature of Return | As a prophet? vs. As a follower of Muhammad’s law? |
As Prophet: Contradicts finality of prophethood (33:40). As Follower: Implies demotion of a prophet’s status. |
| Transmission (Isnād) | Mostly Āḥād (singular-chain) reports, not Mutawātir (mass-transmitted). Many narrators are converts from People of the Book (e.g., Ka’b al-Aḥbār). | Belief in unseen matters (īmān bi-l-ghayb) should be based on definitive proof (qatʿī), which āḥād reports do not provide. |
| Core Concept | Predicting specific events before a “sudden” Hour. | Contradicts verses stating the Hour’s suddenness and that its knowledge is with God alone (7:187, 20:15, 33:63). |
Conclusion
References
- Kur’ân-ı Kerîm Meâli 3. çev. Halil Altuntaş - Muzaffer Şahin. Ankara: Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığı Yayınları, 3. Basım, 2009.
- Ateş, Süleyman. “Hz. İsa ölmüş müdür? Tekrar yeryüzüne gelecek midir?” http://www.dinicevaplar.com. 13 Mart 2019. Erişim 24 Ağustos 2024. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ar5kho-Oag8.
- Aydın, Mehmet. “Faraklit”. TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi. 12/165-166. TDV Yayınları, 1995. https://islamansiklopedisi.org.tr/faraklit.
- Barnabas. Barnabas incili, ts.
- Bayraklı, Bayraktar. “Hz. İsa geri gelecek mi?” Youtube. bayraktarbayrakli.com. 09 Ocak 1998. Erişim 24 Ağustos 2024. https://www.youtube.com/.
- Buhârî, Ebû Abdullah Muhammed bin İsmail el-. el-Câmiʿu’ṣ-ṣaḥîḥ,. nşr. Muhammed Züheyr b. Nasr. 1 Cilt. Şam-Beyrut: Darü ibn Kesir, 1422/2001.
- Çelebi, İlyas. “ÎS”. TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi. 22/472-473. TDV Yayınları, 2000. https://islamansiklopedisi.org.tr/isa.
- Ebu Davud, Süleyman bin Eş’as el-Ezdî es-Sicistânî. Sünen. thk. Şuayb Arnavud-Muhammed Kamil. Lubnan: Dâru Risale el-Alemiyye, 1420.
- Endülüsî, Ebû’l-hayyân el-. en-Nehrü’l-mâd mine’l-bahri’l-muhît. thk. Ömer el-Es’ad. 6 Cilt. Beyrut: Darü’l-cîyl, 1995. http://archive.org/details/alnahralmad.
- Esed, Muhammed. Kur’an Mesajı-Meal Tefsir. çev. Cahit Koytak - Ahmet Ertürk. 3 Cilt. İstanbul: İşaret Yayınları, 1999.
- Eşarî, Ebû’l-Hasan. İlk dönem İslam mezhepleri. çev. Mehmet Dalkılıç - Ömer Aydın. İstanbul: Kabalcı Yayınevi, 1. basım., 2005.
- Harman, Ömer Faruk. “ÎS”. TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi. 22/465-472. TDV Yayınları, 2020. https://islamansiklopedisi.org.tr/isa.
- Harputî, Abdullatif el-. Tenkîhu’l kelâm fî akâid-i ehli’l İslâm: Kelâmî perspektiften İslâm inanç esasları. çev. İbrahim Özdemir - Fikret Karaman. Elazığ: Türk Diyanet Vakfı Elazığ Şubesi Yayınları, 2000.
- Hatîb, Abdülkerim. Kur’an-ı Kerim, Tevrat ve İncillerde Hz. Mesîh. Kahire: Darü’l-kütübü’l-hadise, 1966. https://www.noor-book.com/كتاب-المسيح-فى-القرآن-والتوراة-والإنجيل-pdf.
- İbn Aşur, Muhammed ettâhir b. Muhammed. Tefsirü’t-tahrir ve’t-tenvir. 30 Cilt. Tunus: الدار التونسية, 1984. http://archive.org/details/tahrer_tanwer.
- İbn Hazm, Ebu Muhammed Ali b. Ahmed. el-Fasl fi’l-mileli ve’l-ehvâi ve’n-nihal. thk. Aburrhman Umeyra Muhammed İbrahim Nasr. 1-5 Cilt. Beyrut: Dâru’l-Cîl, 1996.
- İbn Kesîr, Ebu’l-Fida İsmail bin Omer. Tefsirü’l-Kur’ani’l-Azîm. thk. Dr. Muhammed İbrahim el-Benna vd. 8 Cilt. İstanbul: Kahraman, 1984.
- Karaman, Hayreddin. Kur’an yolu: Türkçe meâl ve tefsir. 3. Ankara: Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığı, 2. baskı., 2007.
- Matürîdî, Ebû Mansur Muhammed b. Muhammed el-. Te’vîlâtü’l-Kur’an. thk. Bekir-Muhammed Topaloğlu-Boynukalın. 18 Cilt. İstanbul: Darü’l-mizan, 2005.
- Mevdudi, Ebu’l-A’lâ el-. Tefhimu’l-Kur’an: Kur’an’ın Anlamı ve Tefsiri. 7 Cilt. İstanbul: İnsan Yayınları, 1991.
- Müslim, Ebu’l Hasan en-Nîsâbûrî el-. Sahîh. Riyad: Dârü Tayyibe, 1426.
- Nâsif, eş-Şeyh Mansur Alî. et-Tac el-Cami’ lil-üsûl fi ehâdîsi’r-Rasul. 5 Cilt. Beyrut: Darü’l-fikr, 1997. http://archive.org/details/Attaj-Aljamia-llosol.
- Okuyan, Mehmet. “Hz. İsa Gelmeyecek!” Youtube. www.youtube.com/c/KuranveİslamTv. 02 Eylül 2015. Erişim 24 Ağustos 2024. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6HAkRPSp06I.
- Râzî, Fahreddin Muhammed er-. Mefatihu’l-ġayb. 30 Cilt. Beyrut: Daru’l-Fikr, 1981.
- Rıza, Muhammed Raşid. Tefsîrü’l-menâr. 12 Cilt. Kahire: Darü’l-menâr, 1947. http://archive.org/details/tfseer_manar.
- Schimmel, Annemarie. Dinler tarihine girş. İstanbul: Kirkambar Yayınları, 1999.
- Taberi, Ebû Cafer Muhammed b. Cerir et-. Câmi’ü’l-beyan an âyî Kur’an. thk. Abdullah b. Abdülmuhsin et-Türkî. 26 Cilt. Kahire: Darü Hecr, 1. Basım, 2001. http://archive.org/details/TafsirTabariTurki.
- Taftazanî, Masʿūd Ibn Ömer et-. Kelâm İlmi ve İslam Akâidi- Şerhu’l-akâid. çev. Süleyman Uludağ. İstanbul: Dergâh Yayınları, 1991.
- Team, Almaany. Kâmûs ve mu’cemü’l-meânî müte’addidü’l-lugât ve’l-mecâlât. Erişim 27 Temmuz 2024. https://www.almaany.com/ar/dict/ar-ar/?
- Team, Almaany. المعاني- el-Ayatü ve’s-süverü elltî veredet fîhâ kelimetü... fi’l-Kur’an’l-Kerim. Erişim 17 Ağustos 2024. https://www.almaany.com/quran-b/%D8%B1%D9%81%D8%B9/.
- Topaloğlu, Bekir - Çelebi, İlyas. Kelâm Terimleri Sözlüğü. İsam Yayınları Başvuru Eserleri Dizisi 646. İstanbul: İsam Yayınları, Genişletilmiş ve Gözden geçirilmiş dördüncü basım., 2015.
- Yazır, Muhammed Hamdi Elmalılı. Hak Dili Kur’an Dili. 9 Cilt. İstanbul: Eser, 1979.
- Zemahşerî, Ebû’l-Kâsım Mahmut b. Ömer ez-. Tefsîrü’l-keşşâf. 6 Cilt. Riyad: Darü’l-akide, 1994. http://archive.org/details/Kashaf2.
- CNN TÜRK. “Hz. İsa evli miydi? - Son Dakika Dünya Haberleri”. 20 Eylül 2012. Erişim 20 Ağustos 2024. https://www.cnnturk.com/dunya/hz-isa-evli-miydi-337762.
- Posta. “‘Hz. İsa evliydi ve iki çocuğu vardı’”. 25 Nisan 2018. Erişim 20 Ağustos 2024. https://www.posta.com.tr/yasam/hz-isa-evliydi-ve-iki-cocugu-vardi-252922.
| 1 | Almaany Team, Kâmûs ve mu’cemü’l-meânî müte’addidü’l-lugât ve’l-mecâlât (Erişim 27 Temmuz 2024), “Îsâ”. |
| 2 | Team, “المسيح”. |
| 3 | Bekir Topaloğlu - İlyas Çelebi, Kelâm Terimleri Sözlüğü, İsam Yayınları Başvuru Eserleri Dizisi 646 (İstanbul: İsam Yayınları, 2015), “Mesih”, 213. |
| 4 | Annemarie Schimmel, Dinler tarihine girş (İstanbul: Kirkambar Yayınları, 1999), 308. |
| 5 | Ömer Faruk Harman, “ÎS”, TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi (TDV Yayınları, 2020), 22/465. |
| 6 | Mehmet Aydın, “Faraklit”, TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi (TDV Yayınları, 1995), 12/165. |
| 7 | Schimmel, Dinler tarihine girş, 308. |
| 8 |
Kur’ân-ı Kerîm Meâli 3, çev. Halil Altuntaş - Muzaffer Şahin (Ankara: Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığı Yayınları, 2009), Âli İmran 3/81. |
| 9 | Bayraktar Bayraklı, “Hz. İsa geri gelecek mi?”, youtube, bayraktarbayrakli.com (09 Ocak 1998). |
| 10 | el-En’am 6/85. |
| 11 | en-Nisâ 4/171; es-Saff 61/6. |
| 12 | en-Nisâ 4/171 |
| 13 | el-Bakara 2/136. |
| 14 | Harman, “ÎS”, 22/466. |
| 15 | et-Tevbe 9/30-31. |
| 16 | el-Maide 5/110, 114. |
| 17 | Âl-i İmrân 3/39, 45; en-Nisâ 4/171. |
| 18 | en-Nisâ 4/171. |
| 19 | en-Nisâ 4/157, 171; el-Mâide 5/75; es-Saf 61/6. |
| 20 | el-Bakara 2/87, 253; el-Mâide 5/110. |
| 21 | es-Saf 61/6; Yuhanna 14:16; 15:26; 16:7. |
| 22 | Harman, “ÎS”, 22/467. |
| 23 | El-Maide 5/110. |
| 24 | Team, “Kehlâ”. |
| 25 | “Hz. İsa evli miydi? - Son Dakika Dünya Haberleri”, CNN TÜRK (20 Eylül 2012); “‘Hz. İsa evliydi ve iki çocuğu vardı’”, Posta (25 Nisan 2018). |
| 26 | Matta 28:1-10. |
| 27 | Markos 16:7. |
| 28 | Luka 24:5. |
| 29 | Luka 24:1-12. |
| 30 | Yuhanna 20:1-18. |
| 31 | Luka 24:50-53; Markos 16:19-20; Matta 28:16-20. |
| 32 | Luka 24:50-53; Markos 16:19-20; Matta 28:16-20. |
| 33 | Matta 24:29; Markos 13:24-25. |
| 34 | Matta 24:4-30; Markos 13:24-31; Luka 17:23-24; 21:8-36. |
| 35 | Markos 13: 32; Matta 24:36. |
| 36 | Ebu Muhammed Ali b. Ahmed İbn Hazm, el-Fasl fi’l-mileli ve’l-ehvâi ve’n-nihal, thk. Aburrhman Umeyra Muhammed İbrahim Nasr (Beyrut: Dâru’l-Cîl, 1996), 2/ 129-132 arası sayfalara bakabilirsiniz. |
| 37 | Ta Ha 20/15; el-A’raf 7/187. |
| 38 | Ebû’l-Hasan Eşarî, İlk dönem İslam mezhepleri, çev. Mehmet Dalkılıç - Ömer Aydın (İstanbul: Kabalcı Yayınevi, 2005), 240; Masʿūd Ibn Ömer et-Taftazanî, Kelâm İlmi ve İslam Akâidi- Şerhu’l-akâid, çev. Süleyman Uludağ (İstanbul: Dergâh Yayınları, 1991), 360; Abdullatif el-Harputî, Tenkîhu’l kelâm fî akâid-i ehli’l İslâm: Kelâmî perspektiften İslâm inanç esasları, çev. İbrahim Özdemir - Fikret Karaman (Elazığ: Türk Diyanet Vakfı Elazığ Şubesi Yayınları, 2000), 290. |
| 39 | Harputî, Tenkîhu’l kelâm fî akâid-i ehli’l İslâm, 290. |
| 40 | en-Nisa 4/157-158. |
| 41 | Team, “شبه”. |
| 42 | Barnabas, Barnabas incili, ts., 242. |
| 43 | Ebû Mansur Muhammed b. Muhammed el-Matürîdî, Te’vîlâtü’l-Kur’an, thk. Bekir-Muhammed Topaloğlu-Boynukalın (İstanbul: Darü’l-mizan, 2005), 4/101. |
| 44 | Ebu’l-Fida İsmail bin Omer İbn Kesîr, Tefsirü’l-Kur’ani’l-Azîm, thk. Dr. Muhammed İbrahim el-Benna vd. (İstanbul: Kahraman, 1984), 2/449. |
| 45 | Yuhanna 19:17. |
| 46 | Matta 27:32. |
| 47 | Ebu’l-A’lâ el-Mevdudi, Tefhimu’l-Kur’an: Kur’an’ın Anlamı ve Tefsiri (İstanbul: İnsan Yayınları, 1991), 1/429. |
| 48 | en-Nisa 4/157-158. |
| 49 | Âli İmran 3/54. |
| 50 | Ebû Cafer Muhammed b. Cerir et-Taberi, Câmi’ü’l-beyan an âyî Kur’an, thk. Abdullah b. Abdülmuhsin et-Türkî (Kahire: Darü Hecr, 2001), 5/448. |
| 51 | Taberi, Taberi Tefsiri, 5/448. |
| 52 | Taberi, Taberi Tefsiri, 5/450. |
| 53 | Taberi, Taberi Tefsiri, 5/451. |
| 54 | Taberi, Taberi Tefsiri, 5/450; Fahreddin Muhammed er-Râzî, Mefatihu’l-ġayb (Beyrut: Daru’l-Fikr, 1981), 4/282. |
| 55 | eş-Şeyh Mansur Alî Nâsif, et-Tac el-Cami’ lil-üsûl fi ehâdîsi’r-Rasul (Beyrut: Darü’l-fikr, 1997), 5/358. |
| 56 | Taberi, Taberi Tefsiri, 5/451. |
| 57 | Er-Rum 30/40. |
| 58 | Taberi, Taberi Tefsiri, 5/452. |
| 59 | İbn Kesîr, Tefsirü’l-Kur’ani’l-Azîm, 2/449. |
| 60 | Ebû’l-hayyân el-Endülüsî, en-Nehrü’l-mâd mine’l-bahri’l-muhît, thk. Ömer el-Es’ad (Beyrut: Darü’l-cîyl, 1995), 2/344. |
| 61 | Râzî, Mefatihu’l-ġayb, 4/281. |
| 62 | ez-Zümer 39/42. |
| 63 | Ebû’l-Kâsım Mahmut b. Ömer ez-Zemahşerî, Tefsîrü’l-keşşâf (Riyad: Darü’l-akide, 1994), 1/562. |
| 64 | Matürîdî, Te’vîlâtü’l-Kur’an, 2/315. |
| 65 | Matürîdî, Te’vîlâtü’l-Kur’an, 2/316. |
| 66 | Es-Saffât 37/99. |
| 67 | Muhammed Hamdi Elmalılı Yazır, Hak Dili Kur’an Dili (İstanbul: Eser, 1979), 2/272; Daha geniş bilgi için Harputî, Tenkîhu’l kelâm fî akâid-i ehli’l İslâm eserinin s.290 vd. bakılabilir. |
| 68 | Nâsif, Tac, 5/358. |
| 69 | Ebû Abdullah Muhammed bin İsmail el-Buhârî, el-Câmiʿu’ṣ-ṣaḥîḥ, nşr. Muhammed Züheyr b. Nasr (Şam-Beyrut: Darü ibn Kesir, 1422/2001), “Büyû’”, 102, “Enbiya”, 49; Ebu’l Hasan en-Nîsâbûrî el-Müslim, Sahîh (Riyad: Dârü Tayyibe, 1426), “İman”,242,243, 247, “Hac”, 216, “Fiten”,34,39,110. |
| 70 | Ez-Zümer 39/42. |
| 71 | Es-Secde 32/11. |
| 72 | Meryem 19/57. |
| 73 | Âli İmrân 3/169; el-Bakara 2/154. |
| 74 | Muhammed Raşid Rıza, Tefsîrü’l-menâr (Kahire: Darü’l-menâr, 1947), 3/316. |
| 75 | Rıza, Tefsîrü’l-menâr, 6/20. |
| 76 | Muhammed ettâhir b. Muhammed İbn Aşur, Tefsirü’t-tahrir ve’t-tenvir (Tunus: الدار التونسية, 1984), 3/257. |
| 77 | İbn Aşur, Tefsirü’t-tahrir ve’t-tenvir, 2/259. |
| 78 | Taberi, Taberi Tefsiri, 5/452. |
| 79 | Team, “توفّي”. |
| 80 | ez-Zümer 39/42. |
| 81 | En-Nisa 4/97; en-Nahl 16/28. |
| 82 | En-Nisa 4/158. |
| 83 | Âli İmran 3/55. |
| 84 | Hayreddin Karaman, Kur’an yolu: Türkçe meâl ve tefsir. 3 (Ankara: Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığı, 2007), 2/176. |
| 85 | en-Nisa 4/158. |
| 86 | Karaman, Kur’an yolu, 2/177. |
| 87 | Âli İmran 3/55. |
| 88 | En-Nisa 4/155. |
| 89 | İbn Aşur, Tefsirü’t-tahrir ve’t-tenvir, 6/24. |
| 90 | el-Maide 5/117. |
| 91 | İbn Aşur, Tefsirü’t-tahrir ve’t-tenvir, 8/117. |
| 92 | Râzî, Mefatihu’l-ġayb, 4/281; Taberi, Taberi Tefsiri, 5/451. |
| 93 | Nâsif, Tac, 5/358. |
| 94 | Süleyman bin Eş’as el-Ezdî es-Sicistânî Ebu Davud, Sünen, thk. Şuayb Arnavud-Muhammed Kamil (Lubnan: Dâru Risale el-Alemiyye, 1420), "Kitabü’l-fiten", 14 (4324). |
| 95 | El-A‘raf 7/187. |
| 96 | Ta ha 20/15. |
| 97 | Taberi, Taberi Tefsiri, 16/34 vd; Team, “أكاد أخفيها”. |
| 98 | Matta, 24:36. |
| 99 | Müslim, Sahîh, "Kitabü’l-fiten ve eşrati’s-saat", 2937. |
| 100 | Abdülkerim Hatîb, Kur’an-ı Kerim, Tevrat ve İncillerde Hz. Mesîh (Kahire: Darü’l-kütübü’l-hadise, 1966), 537-539. |
| 101 | El-Maide 5/3. |
| 102 | El-Ahzab 33/40. |
| 103 | Mehmet Okuyan, “Hz. İsa Gelmeyecek!”, youtube, www.youtube.com/c/KuranveİslamTv (02 Eylül 2015). |
| 104 | er-Rum 30/40. |
| 105 | Taberi, Taberi Tefsiri, 5/452. |
| 106 | Âli İmran 3/55. |
| 107 | Meryem 19/33. |
| 108 | Meryem 19/15. |
| 109 | Bayraklı, “Hz. İsa geri gelecek mi?” (09 Ocak 1998). |
| 110 | el-Enbiya 21/34. |
| 111 | Süleyman Ateş, “Hz. İsa ölmüş müdür? Tekrar yeryüzüne gelecek midir?”, http://www.dinicevaplar.com (13 Mart 2019). |
| 112 | Almaany Team, المعاني- El-Ayatü ve’s-Süverü Elltî Veredet Fîhâ Kelimetü... Fi’l-Kur’an’l-Kerim (Erişim 17 Ağustos 2024), “رفع”. |
| 113 | Meryem 19/57. |
| 114 | el-En’am 6/165. |
| 115 | el-Bakara 2/127. |
| 116 | Yusuf 12/100. |
| 117 | Team, “رفع”. |
| 118 | Muhammed Esed, Kur’an Mesajı-Meal Tefsir, çev. Cahit Koytak - Ahmet Ertürk (İstanbul: İşaret Yayınları, 1999), 1/177; Karaman, Kur’an yolu, 2/176. |
| 119 | Meryem 19/57. |
| 120 | Başlangıç, 5:22-24. |
| 121 | İbraniler, 11:5 |
| 122 | Rıza, Tefsîrü’l-menâr, 6/21. |
| 123 | İlyas Çelebi, “ÎS”, TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi (TDV Yayınları, 2000), 22/473. |
| 124 | et-Tekvîr 81/1-3. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).