Preprint Article Version 3 Preserved in Portico This version is not peer-reviewed

Dual Cosmic Horizon Radius of Spacetime Curvature of a Multi-Path Connected Cosmic Topology

Version 1 : Received: 14 May 2020 / Approved: 15 May 2020 / Online: 15 May 2020 (09:49:54 CEST)
Version 2 : Received: 18 May 2020 / Approved: 18 May 2020 / Online: 18 May 2020 (11:37:59 CEST)
Version 3 : Received: 12 June 2020 / Approved: 12 June 2020 / Online: 12 June 2020 (14:30:54 CEST)
Version 4 : Received: 25 August 2020 / Approved: 25 August 2020 / Online: 25 August 2020 (13:50:33 CEST)
Version 5 : Received: 23 September 2020 / Approved: 23 September 2020 / Online: 23 September 2020 (10:41:14 CEST)
Version 6 : Received: 7 October 2020 / Approved: 8 October 2020 / Online: 8 October 2020 (09:43:17 CEST)
Version 7 : Received: 12 October 2020 / Approved: 13 October 2020 / Online: 13 October 2020 (09:38:38 CEST)
Version 8 : Received: 16 December 2020 / Approved: 17 December 2020 / Online: 17 December 2020 (11:45:26 CET)
Version 9 : Received: 29 April 2021 / Approved: 29 April 2021 / Online: 29 April 2021 (09:10:40 CEST)
Version 10 : Received: 21 June 2021 / Approved: 21 June 2021 / Online: 21 June 2021 (11:43:55 CEST)
Version 11 : Received: 28 December 2022 / Approved: 29 December 2022 / Online: 29 December 2022 (11:31:00 CET)

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

Al-Fadhli, M.B. On Spacetime Duality and Bounce Cosmology of a Dual Universe. The 1st Electronic Conference on Universe 2021, doi:10.3390/ecu2021-09291. Al-Fadhli, M.B. On Spacetime Duality and Bounce Cosmology of a Dual Universe. The 1st Electronic Conference on Universe 2021, doi:10.3390/ecu2021-09291.


The necessity of the dark energy and dark matter in the present universe could be a consequence of the antimatter elimination assumption in the early universe. In this research, I derive a new model to obtain the cosmic horizon radius and the potential cosmic topology utilising a new construal of space geometry inspired by large-angle correlations of the cosmic microwave background (CMB). A version of the Big Bounce theory is utilised to avoid the Big Bang singularity and inflationary constraints, and to tune the initial conditions of the curvature density. The mathematical derivation of a positively curved universe governed by only gravity revealed two cosmic horizon solutions. Although the positive horizon is conventionally associated with the evolution of the matter universe, the negative horizon solution could imply additional evolution in the opposite direction. This possibly suggests that the matter and antimatter could be evolving in opposite directions as distinct sides of the universe, as in the visualised Sloan Digital Sky Survey. The cosmic horizon radius is found to be accountable for the universal space curvature. By implementing this model, we find a decelerated stage of expansion during the first 10 Gyr, which is followed by a second stage of an accelerated expansion; potentially matching the tension in Hubble parameter measurements. In addition, the model predicts a final time-reversal stage of spatial contraction leading to the Big Crunch of a cyclic universe. The predicted density is 1.14. Other predictions are (1) a calculable flow rate of the matter side towards the antimatter side at the accelerated stage; conceivably explaining the dark flow observation, (2) a time-dependent spacetime curvature over horizon evolution, which could influence the galactic rotational speed; possibly explaining the high speed of stars, and (3) evolvable spacetime internal voids at the accelerated stage, which could contribute in continuously increasing the matter and antimatter densities elsewhere in both sides respectively. These findings may indicate the existence of the antimatter as a distinct side, which influences the evolution of the universe instead of the dark energy or dark matter.

Supplementary and Associated Material visualised Sloan Digital Sky Survey


cosmology; cosmic horizon; topology; antimatter; accelerated expansion; time-reversal


Physical Sciences, Space Science

Comments (1)

Comment 1
Received: 12 June 2020
Commenter: Mohammed Al-Fadhli
Commenter's Conflict of Interests: Author
Comment: Dear Editor,

I hope you are doing very well

Comment: A general revision of the text and improvement of some figures

Kind regards,

+ Respond to this comment

We encourage comments and feedback from a broad range of readers. See criteria for comments and our Diversity statement.

Leave a public comment
Send a private comment to the author(s)
* All users must log in before leaving a comment
Views 0
Downloads 0
Comments 1
Metrics 0

Notify me about updates to this article or when a peer-reviewed version is published.
We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience.
Read more about our cookies here.