Submitted:
15 August 2025
Posted:
18 August 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Animals
2.2. Echocardiography
2.3. Blood Work and Biomarker Evaluation
2.4. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Study Population Overview
3.2. Echocardiographic Parameters of the Study Animals
3.3. The Correlation Matrix of Inflammatory Biomarkers and Echocardiographic Parameters in Animals
3.4. Inflammatory Biomarkers in Study Animals
3.5. Survival Analysis
4. Discussion
4. Limitation
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Atkins, C.E.; Häggström, J. Epidemiology and Pathophysiology of Chronic Valvular Heart Disease in Dogs. J. Vet. Cardiol. 2009, 11, S93–S97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borgarelli, M.; Buchanan, J.W. Historical Review, Epidemiology and Natural History of Degenerative Mitral Valve Disease. J. Vet. Cardiol. 2012, 14, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Johnson, L. Diagnosis of Pulmonary Hypertension in Dogs: Echocardiography and Beyond. Vet. Clin. North Am. Small Anim. Pract. 2010, 40, 839–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Visser, L.C.; Im, M.K.; Johnson, L.R.; Stern, J.A. Diagnostic Value of Pulmonary Artery/Aorta Ratio Determined by Echocardiography in Dogs with Pulmonary Hypertension. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2016, 30, 543–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kellihan, H.B.; Stepien, R.L. Pulmonary Hypertension in Dogs: Diagnosis and Therapy. Vet. Clin. North Am. Small Anim. Pract. 2010, 40, 623–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kellihan, H.B.; MacDonald, K.A. Echocardiographic Assessment of Pulmonary Artery Pressure in Dogs: Evaluation of a Ratio of Pulmonary Artery to Aortic Diameter. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2010, 24, 1429–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yndestad, A.; Damås, J.K.; Oie, E.; Ueland, T.; Gullestad, L.; Aukrust, P. Systemic Inflammation in Heart Failure—The Role of Chemokines and Cytokines. Cardiovasc. Res. 2006, 70, 211–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sluijter, J.P.G.; Pulskens, W.P.; Schroen, B.; et al. Inflammatory Responses and Cardiac Repair after Myocardial Infarction: Role of Inflammasomes. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2014, 11, 210–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DeProspero, D. J. , Hess, R. S., & Silverstein, D. C. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is increased in dogs with acute congestive heart failure secondary to myxomatous mitral valve disease compared to both dogs with heart murmurs and healthy controls. JAVMA. 2023, 261, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ku, D. , Chae, Y., Kim, C., Koo, Y., Lee, D., Yun, T., Chang, D., Kang, B. T., Yang, M. P., & Kim, H. Severity of myxomatous mitral valve disease in dogs may be predicted using neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio. Ame. J. Vet. Res. 2023, 84, ajvr.23–01.0012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kocaturk, M. , Saril, A., Oz, A. D., Rubio, C. P., Ceron, J. J., & Yilmaz, Z. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and red blood cell distribution width to platelet ratio and their relationships with inflammatory and antioxidant status in dogs with different stages of heart failure due to myxomatous mitral valve disease. Vet. Res. Commun. 2024, 48, 2477–2487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Domanjko Petrič, A. , Lukman, T., Verk, B., & Nemec Svete, A. (2018). Systemic inflammation in dogs with advanced-stage heart failure. Acta Vet. Scand. 2018, 60, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rubio, C. P. , Saril, A., Kocaturk, M., Tanaka, R., Koch, J., Ceron, J. J., & Yilmaz, Z. Changes of inflammatory and oxidative stress biomarkers in dogs with different stages of heart failure. BMC Vet. Res. 2020, 16, 433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pasmans, M.; Smets, P.; Van den Broeck, W.; et al. C-Reactive Protein as a Marker for Inflammation in Dogs with MMVD. Vet. J. 2015, 203, 92–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferrucci, L.; Corsi, A.; Lauretani, F.; et al. The Origins of Age-Related Proinflammatory State. Blood 2005, 105, 2294–2299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chatterjee, N.A.; Murphy, S.P.; Mallick, A.; et al. CRP and Risk of Atrial Fibrillation: The Framingham Study. Am. Heart J. 2016, 171, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zafrir, B.; Salman, N.; Shacham, Y.; et al. Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and CRP in Predicting Long-Term Outcomes in Heart Failure Patients. Clin. Res. Cardiol. 2016, 105, 581–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Visser, L.C.; Scansen, B.A.; Schober, K.E.; Bonagura, J.D. Echocardiographic Assessment of Left Atrial Size and Function in Dogs. J. Vet. Cardiol. 2019, 21, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kellihan, H.B.; Stepien, R.L. Clinical Characterization of Canine Pulmonary Hypertension: 125 Cases (2001–2011). J. Vet. Cardiol. 2012, 14, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cornell, C. C. , Kittleson, M. D., Della Torre, P., Häggström, J., Lombard, C. W., Pedersen, H. D., Vollmar, A., & Wey, A. Allometric scaling of M-mode cardiac measurements in normal adult dogs J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2004, 18, 311–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keene, B. W., Atkins, C. E., Bonagura, J. D., Fox, P. R., Häggström, J., Fuentes, V. L., Oyama, M. A., Rush, J. E., Stepien, R., Uechi, M. ACVIM consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of myxomatous mitral valve disease in dogs . J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2019, 33, 1127–1140. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- van Staveren, M.D.B.; Muis, E.; Szatmári, V. Self-Reported Utilization of International (ACVIM Consensus) Guidelines and the Latest Clinical Trial Results on the Treatment of Dogs with Various Stages of Myxomatous Mitral Valve Degeneration: A Survey among Veterinary Practitioners. Animals. 2024, 14, 772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Côté, E.; Ettinger, S.J.; Sisson, D.D. Ettinger’s Textbook of Veterinary Internal Medicine: Diseases of the Dog and the Cat, 8th ed.; Elsevier: St. Louis, MO, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Thomas, J.D.; Badano, L.P.; Appleton, C.P.; DeMaria, A.N.; Doppler Quantitation Task Force of the Nomenclature and Standards Committee of the ASE. Recommendations for the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function by Echocardiography. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2009, 22, 107–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dal-Bianco, J.P.; Beaudoin, J.; Handschumacher, M.D.; Levine, R.A. Basic mechanisms of mitral regurgitation. Can. J. Cardiol. 2014, 30, 971–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J. L. , Yang, R., Zhu, Y., Shao, Y., Ji, Y., & Wang, F. F. Association between the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and risk of in-hospital heart failure and arrhythmia in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2023, 10, 1275713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X. , Li, D., & Du, Y. Prognostic value of the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio for cardiovascular diseases: research progress. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2025, 17, 1170–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- García-Escobar, A. , Vera-Vera, S. , Tébar-Márquez, D., Rivero-Santana, B., Jurado-Román, A., Jiménez-Valero, S., Galeote, G., Cabrera, J. Á., & Moreno, R. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio an inflammatory biomarker, and prognostic marker in heart failure, cardiovascular disease and chronic inflammatory diseases: New insights for a potential predictor of anti-cytokine therapy responsiveness. Microvasc. Res. 2023, 150, 104598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reimann, M. J. , Ljungvall, I., Hillström, A., Møller, J. E., Hagman, R., Falk, T., Höglund, K., Häggström, J., & Olsen, L. H. Increased serum C-reactive protein concentrations in dogs with congestive heart failure due to myxomatous mitral valve disease. Vet. J. 2016, 209, 113–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ku, D. , Chae, Y., Kim, C., Koo, Y., Lee, D., Yun, T., Chang, D., Kang, B. T., Yang, M. P., & Kim, H. Severity of myxomatous mitral valve disease in dogs may be predicted using neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2023, 84, ajvr.23–01.0012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]





| Parameters | Total (N=94) |
MMVD | P-Value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stage B1 (N=8) |
Stage B2 (N=43) |
Stage C (N=38) |
Stage D (N=5) |
|||
| Age (years) |
11.18 ± 2.90 | 9.00 ± 3.0 | 10.74 ± 2.81 | 12.01 ± 2.80 | 12.00 ± 1.10 | 0.0662 |
| Body weight (kg) | 5.04 ± 3.00 | 7.39 ± 3.84 | 4.95 ± 2.71 | 4.28 ± 1.70 | 7.70 ± 6.24 | 0.0253 |
| Male (number (%)) |
44/94 (46.80%) | 3/8 (37.5%) |
22/43 (51.16%) |
18/38 (47.37%) |
1/5 (20.0%) |
- |
| Parameters | Total (N=94) |
MMVD | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stage B1 (N=8) |
Stage B2 (N=43) |
Stage C (N=38) |
Stage D (N=5) |
Ref. Value | ||
| WBC (x103/uL) | 13.09 ± 5.86 | 12.08 ± 5.41 | 12.84 ± 5.83 | 13.72 ± 6.27 | 11.77 ± 1.92 | |
| NLR ratio |
5.44 ± 3.84 | 5.32 ± 3.19 | 5.48 ± 3.82 | 5.46 ± 4.23 | 4.39 ± 1.60 | |
| CRP (mg/L) |
16.41 ± 30.33 | 4.42 ± 2.98 | 13.43 ± 24.49 | 17.04 ± 34.63 | 39.76 ± 5.28 | |
| BUN (mg%) |
35.99 ± 24.83 | 32.17 ± 14.87 | 31.31 ± 23.98 | 40.98 ± 26.57 | 39.75 ± 23.16 | |
| Creatinine (mg%) | 1.41 ± 1.77 | 1.27 ± 0.89 | 1.00 ± 0.53 | 1.60 ± 1.54 | 4.23 ± 5.65 | |
| ALT (U/L) |
87.47 ± 9.79 | 163.40 ± 45.42 | 84.11 ± 16.28 | 77.10 ± 9.46 | 88.75 ± 16.63 | |
| ALP (U/L) |
116.38 ± 9.41 | 152.75 ± 33.71 | 122.79 ± 14.96 | 106.29 ± 11.47 | 95.67 ± 17.56 | |
| Parameters | MMVD | P-Value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stage B1 (N=8) |
Stage B2 (N=43) |
Stage C (N=38) |
Stage D (N=5) |
||
| LA/AO ratio | 1.58 ± 0.22 | 1.78 ± 0.23 | 1.98 ± 0.40 | 2.74 ± 0.92 | <0.0001 |
| LA Volume (mL) | 5.39 ± 3.83 | 5.13 ± 3.01 | 6.97 ± 5.33 | 10.47± 8.90 | 0.1058 |
| MPA (cm) | 0.87 ± 0.30 | 1.12 ± 0.23 | 1.11 ± 0.28 | 1.58 ± 0.52 | 0.0004 |
| MPA/AO | 0.93 ± 0.09 | 1.08 ± 0.18 | 1.15 ± 0.19 | 1.34 ± 0.19 | 0.0842 |
| MR Volume (mL) | 0.90 ± 0.60 | 0.98 ± 1.97 | 2.04± 2.69 | 4.10 ± 5.52 | 0.0564 |
| IVSd (cm) | 0.65 ± 0.12 | 0.58 ± 0.13 | 0.55 ± 0.16 | 0.70 ± 0.30 | 0.1172 |
| LVPWd (cm) | 0.59 ± 0.12 | 0.57 ± 0.13 | 0.54 ± 0.15 | 0.64 ± 0.17 | 0.3881 |
| LVIDd (cm) | 2.32 ± 0.58 | 2.26 ± 0.65 | 2.64 ± 0.78 | 3.76 ± 1.62 | 0.0008 |
| LVIDdN (cm) | 1.48 ± 0.11 | 1.50 ± 0.30 | 1.80 ± 0.41 | 2.12 ± 0.49 | 0.5730 |
| FS (%) | 39.18 ± 7.19 | 31.34 ± 6.55 | 34.01 ± 10.05 | 34.10 ± 6.53 | 0.1030 |
| MV E/A ratio | 1.17 ± 0.47 | 0.77 ± 0.21 | 1.01 ± 0.47 | 1.33 ± 0.69 | 0.0017 |
| IVRT (ms) | 50.00 ± 0.01 | 60.00 ± 0.02 | 70.00 ± 0.01 | 80.00 ± 0.00 | 0.0565 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).