1. Introduction
The Lambda-Cold Dark Matter (
CDM) model stands as the cornerstone of modern cosmology, successfully describing a vast array of observations from the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) to the large-scale distribution of galaxies [
1,
2]. Despite its successes, its foundation is shadowed by growing discordances between independent cosmological probes. The most statistically significant of these is the Hubble tension: a nearly
discrepancy between the value of the Hubble constant
inferred from the early universe via the
Planck satellite (
km/s/Mpc) [
1] and that measured directly in the late universe using Type Ia supernovae calibrated with Cepheid variables (
km/s/Mpc) [
3].
This tension, along with others such as the
discrepancy in the amplitude of matter clustering [
2], suggests that
CDM may be an incomplete or effective description of our universe, motivating extensions to the standard model. Many proposed solutions involve modifying the dark energy sector or introducing new particle physics in the early universe. In this work, we explore a different paradigm: that the tensions are not a sign of missing components, but rather a signal of modified gravity, driven by a scale-dependent gravitational coupling.
We propose a theory where gravity is mediated not only by the metric tensor but also by a scalar field
non-minimally coupled to the trace of the matter stress-energy tensor. The key innovation is that the coupling strength,
, is not a fundamental constant but an effective parameter that "runs" with the energy scale, a concept well-established in quantum field theory (QFT). This running is governed by a non-perturbative beta function derived from the principle of asymptotic safety [
4,
5]. This principle posits that gravity can be a well-behaved and predictive quantum theory at arbitrarily high energies due to the existence of a non-trivial ultraviolet (UV) fixed point, taming its non-renormalizable behavior.
This framework provides a natural, physically motivated mechanism to resolve the tensions. In the dense environments of galaxies and the solar system, the scalar interaction is screened, recovering General Relativity (GR) and satisfying stringent local tests of gravity. In the low-density cosmic web, the coupling is unscreened, leading to a stronger effective gravitational force. This enhancement of gravity at late times alters the cosmic expansion history, reconciling the early and late universe measurements of without spoiling the pristine fit of CDM to the CMB.
This paper is structured as follows. In
Section 2, we lay out the QFT foundations of the model. In
Section 3, we implement this framework in a cosmological context.
Section 4 presents our main results. In
Section 5, we provide an expanded discussion, comparing our model to alternatives and outlining the path toward a complete theory. We conclude in
Section 6. Detailed derivations are provided in the Appendices.
2. Quantum Field Theory Framework
2.1. Asymptotically Safe Action
The theory is defined by the action for gravity, the Standard Model, and a scalar field
:
where
is the reduced Planck mass. The scalar Lagrangian is given by
where
is the trace of the matter stress-energy tensor and
is the dimensionless coupling that depends on the renormalization scale
. The principle of asymptotic safety posits that the Renormalization Group (RG) flow of the theory’s couplings approaches a non-trivial fixed point in the UV, rendering the theory predictive. For a detailed discussion of the one-loop counter-terms and renormalizability, see
Appendix A.
2.2. The Running Coupling
The non-perturbative beta function for our coupling, describing its change with energy scale, is modeled as:
This form is the simplest one that captures the essential physics of an asymptotically safe theory. It ensures two fixed points: a trivial Gaussian fixed point at
, which corresponds to a non-interacting theory, and a non-trivial UV fixed point at
. As the energy scale
, the coupling approaches
, taming the quantum divergences. Our analysis, fitting to a combination of galactic and cosmological data, constrains these parameters to
and
. Solving the RG equation gives the running coupling (see
Appendix A for the explicit solution).
2.3. Environmental Screening
For any modified gravity theory to be viable, its effects must be suppressed in high-density environments to satisfy stringent solar system tests. Our model achieves this through a screening mechanism. The scalar field acquires an effective mass that depends on the local matter density
. This is modeled by modulating the effective coupling
based on the ambient density:
where
is the unscreened cosmological value active in cosmic voids, and we find a best-fit screening density of
. This ensures that the modification is fully active at mean cosmological densities but becomes negligible in galaxies (
) and the solar system.
3. Cosmological Implementation
The presence of the scalar field modifies the Friedmann equations. The effective gravitational strength is enhanced, leading to a modified Hubble parameter
:
where
and
is evaluated at the background matter density
. A robust test of the model is its ability to self-consistently predict observables like the comoving distance
and the sound horizon
. The specific numerical methods used for these calculations are detailed in
Appendix B.
4. Results: Resolving Tensions
4.1. The Hubble Tension
We perform a detailed analysis by comparing two scenarios: one anchored to the
Planck value (67.4) and one to the SH0ES local value (73.0). The results are in
Table 1. The key finding is that the CMB angular scale
is preserved. The modified gravity introduces a degeneracy that allows consistency with both the CMB and local measurements, completely resolving the Hubble tension.
4.2. Large-Scale Structure
The modified gravity enhances the growth of structure. This leads to a stronger ISW effect, with a predicted enhancement of
relative to
CDM, consistent with observations [
6]. It also predicts a significant increase in the number of massive galaxy clusters, as calculated using the Press-Schechter formalism (see
Appendix B) and shown in
Figure 1. These and other key predictions are summarized in
Table 2.
5. Discussion and Future Work
5.1. Comparison with Alternative Models
It is instructive to place our framework in the context of other proposed solutions to the cosmological tensions. Early dark energy (EDE) models [
12] alleviate the Hubble tension by adding a new energy component before recombination, but they often exacerbate the
tension. Models with interacting dark energy or modified dark matter sectors can also address the tensions but often require fine-tuning or introduce new, unobserved particles.
Our approach differs fundamentally. It does not introduce new energy components. Instead, it modifies the gravitational law itself, motivated by the fundamental QFT principle of asymptotic safety. Unlike phenomenological models like MOND [
13] or many
theories, our framework provides a UV completion and a natural mechanism for scale dependence. The environmental screening is also a natural consequence of the theory, not an ad-hoc addition.
5.2. Theoretical Status and Open Questions
The framework presented here provides a compelling proof of concept. However, this work represents the first step in a larger research program, as illustrated by the roadmap in
Figure 2. The immediate next steps involve moving from the semi-analytical calculations presented here to full numerical simulations by modifying community codes like CLASS [
14] and GADGET-4 [
15]. This will allow for a full MCMC parameter-fitting analysis and a detailed study of non-linear structure formation.
On the theoretical front, a more rigorous derivation of the beta function (Equation (
3)) from first principles, including all Standard Model couplings, is necessary. This requires sophisticated multi-loop calculations. Furthermore, a detailed treatment of the neutrino sector and its coupling to the scalar field must be integrated into the framework.
6. Conclusions
We have presented a novel theoretical framework based on scale-dependent gravity that successfully addresses the tensions plaguing the standard CDM model. By grounding the model in the QFT principle of asymptotic safety, we provide a natural mechanism for the gravitational coupling to run with energy scale.
Our key findings are:
The model provides a complete resolution to the Hubble tension by modifying the late-time expansion history while preserving the angular scale of the CMB sound horizon.
It predicts an enhanced ISW effect and an increase in the abundance of massive galaxy clusters, both of which are testable with current and upcoming surveys.
The framework is UV-complete and includes a viable environmental screening mechanism, ensuring consistency with local tests of gravity.
While significant work remains to fully develop and validate this theory, the results presented here offer a predictive new paradigm for understanding our universe, suggesting that cosmological tensions may be the first sign of a new, scale-dependent law of gravity.
Funding
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank his family for their love and support. This work has made use of the Matplotlib [
16], NumPy [
17], and SciPy [
18] software packages.
Conflicts of Interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
Ethics Statement
This theoretical research did not involve human participants, animal subjects, or sensitive data requiring ethical approval.
Appendix A. Rigorous QFT Derivations
Appendix A.1. One-Loop Renormalization
To ensure the theory is well-defined, we must show that UV divergences can be absorbed into a redefinition of the theory’s parameters. At one-loop, the divergent parts of the effective action are canceled by introducing a counter-term Lagrangian,
. For the scalar sector, the divergent structure is given by:
where
in dimensional regularization. The renormalization constants (Z-factors) absorb the divergences. For the scalar kinetic term and the non-minimal coupling, they take the form:
The ability to absorb all such divergences confirms the one-loop renormalizability of the scalar sector.
Appendix A.2. Solution to the RG Equation
The running of the coupling
from a reference scale
to an arbitrary scale
is found by solving the differential equation defined by the beta function in Equation (
3). The solution is:
where
. This equation shows how the coupling flows from the UV fixed point (
as
) to its IR values.
Appendix B. Cosmological Implementation Details
Appendix B.1. Self-Consistent CMB Observables
The cosmological parameters in
Table 1 were calculated using numerical integration. The comoving distance
was computed via ‘scipy.integrate.quad’ of
from
to
. The sound horizon
was similarly computed by integrating
from
to infinity, where the sound speed is
and
.
Appendix B.2. Halo Mass Function Formalism
The HMF in
Figure 1 was calculated using the Press-Schechter formalism [
19]. The differential number of halos per unit mass is:
where
is the present-day matter density (in units of
),
is the critical overdensity for collapse, and
is the variance of the linear density field smoothed on a scale corresponding to halo mass
M. The modification enters through the growth factor, which alters the redshift evolution of
, where
is calculated in our model.
References
- Planck Collaboration. ; Aghanim, N..; Akrami, Y..; Ashdown, M..; Aumont, J..; Baccigalupi, C..; Ballardini, M..; Banday, A. J..; Barreiro, R. B..; Bartolo, N..; et al. Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. Astron. Astrophys. 2020, 641, A6–1807.06209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DES Collaboration. ; Abbott, T. M. C..; Aguena, M..; Alarcon, A..; Allam, S..; Alves, O..; Amara, A..; Annis, J..; Avila, S..; Bacon, D..; et al. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing. Phys. Rev. D 2022, 105, 023520–2105.13549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Riess, A.G.; Yuan, W.; Macri, L.M.; Scolnic, D.; Brout, D.; Casertano, S.; Jones, D.O.; Murakami, Y.; Breuval, L.; Brink, T.G.; et al. A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km/s/Mpc Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2022, 934, L7–2112.04510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weinberg, S. Ultraviolet divergences in quantum theories of gravitation. In General Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Survey; Hawking, S. W. and Israel, W.., Ed.; Cambridge University Press, 1979; pp. 790–831.
- Reuter, M. Nonperturbative evolution equation for quantum gravity. Phys. Rev. D 1998, 57, 971–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kovács, A.; García-García, C.; Crittenden, R.; Giusarma, E.; Jeffrey, N.; Whiteway, L.; van Waerbeke, L. Hint of a new component of the Universe from the integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 2022, 512, 2569–2585, [2109.06179]. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Euclid Collaboration. ; Amendola, L..; Appleby, S..; Avgoustidis, A..; Bacon, D..; Baker, T..; Baldi, M..; Bartolo, N..; Blanchard, A..; Bonvin, C..; et al. Euclid: A space telescope to map the dark Universe. Living Rev. Relativ. 2020, 23, 2–1810.00493. [Google Scholar]
- Ivezić, Ž.; et al. LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products. Astrophys. J. 2019, 873, 111–0805.2366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DESI Collaboration.; Abbott, T. M. C..; Aguilera-Verdugo, J..; Ahlen, S..; Alam, S..; Allende, S..; Alves de Oliveira, A..; Amriz, A..; Anand, A..; Andrade-Oliveira, F..; et al. Baryon Acoustic Oscillations from the Final Data Release of the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument. arXiv e-prints 2024, p. arXiv:2404.03000, [2404.03000].
- SKA Collaboration. ; Bacon, D. J..; Battye, R. A..; Bull, P..; Camera, S..; Ferreira, P. G..; Harrison, I..; Ma, Y.-Z..; McKean, J..; Pourtsidou, A..; et al. Cosmology with the Square Kilometre Array. PoS 2020, 301, 001–1811.02743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- LISA Collaboration.; Amaro-Seoane, P..; Audley, H..; Babak, S..; Baker, J..; Barausse, E..; Bender, P..; Berti, E..; Binetruy, P..; Born, M..; et al. Laser Interferometer Space Antenna. arXiv e-prints 2017, p. arXiv:1702.00786, [1702.00786].
- Poulin, V.; Smith, T.L.; Karwal, T.; Kamionkowski, M. Early Dark Energy Can Resolve The Hubble Tension. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019, 122, 221301–1811.04083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Milgrom, M. A modification of the Newtonian dynamics as a possible alternative to the hidden mass hypothesis. Astrophys. J. 1983, 270, 365–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blas, D.; Lesgourgues, J.; Tram, T. The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) II: Approximation schemes. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2011, 2011, 034–1104.2933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Springel, V.; Pakmor, R.; Zier, O.; Reinecke, M. Simulating cosmic structure formation with the GADGET-4 code. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 2021, 506, 2857–2884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hunter, J.D. Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment. Comput. Sci. Eng. 2007, 9, 90–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harris, C.R.; Millman, K.J.; van der Walt, S.J.; Gommers, R.; Virtanen, P.; Cournapeau, D.; Wieser, E.; Taylor, J.; Berg, S.; Smith, N.J.; et al. Array programming with NumPy. Nature 2020, 585, 357–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Virtanen, P.; Gommers, R.; Oliphant, T.E.; Haberland, M.; Reddy, T.; Cournapeau, D.; Burovski, E.; Peterson, P.; Weckesser, W.; Bright, J.; et al. SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python. Nat. Methods 2020, 17, 261–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Press, W.H.; Schechter, P. Formation of Galaxies and Clusters of Galaxies by Self-Similar Gravitational Condensation. Astrophys. J. 1974, 187, 425–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).