Submitted:
07 August 2025
Posted:
08 August 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract

Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Quantum Field Theory Framework
2.1. Asymptotically Safe Action
2.2. The Running Coupling
2.3. Environmental Screening
3. Cosmological Implementation
4. Results: Resolving Tensions
4.1. The Hubble Tension
4.2. Large-Scale Structure
5. Discussion and Future Work
5.1. Comparison with Alternative Models
5.2. Theoretical Status and Open Questions
6. Conclusions
- The model provides a complete resolution to the Hubble tension by modifying the late-time expansion history while preserving the angular scale of the CMB sound horizon.
- It predicts an enhanced ISW effect and an increase in the abundance of massive galaxy clusters, both of which are testable with current and upcoming surveys.
- The framework is UV-complete and includes a viable environmental screening mechanism, ensuring consistency with local tests of gravity.
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Ethics Statement
Appendix A. Rigorous QFT Derivations
Appendix A.1. One-Loop Renormalization
Appendix A.2. Solution to the RG Equation
Appendix B. Cosmological Implementation Details
Appendix B.1. Self-Consistent CMB Observables
Appendix B.2. Halo Mass Function Formalism
References
- Planck Collaboration. ; Aghanim, N..; Akrami, Y..; Ashdown, M..; Aumont, J..; Baccigalupi, C..; Ballardini, M..; Banday, A. J..; Barreiro, R. B..; Bartolo, N..; et al. Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. Astron. Astrophys. 2020, 641, A6–1807.06209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DES Collaboration. ; Abbott, T. M. C..; Aguena, M..; Alarcon, A..; Allam, S..; Alves, O..; Amara, A..; Annis, J..; Avila, S..; Bacon, D..; et al. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing. Phys. Rev. D 2022, 105, 023520–2105.13549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Riess, A.G.; Yuan, W.; Macri, L.M.; Scolnic, D.; Brout, D.; Casertano, S.; Jones, D.O.; Murakami, Y.; Breuval, L.; Brink, T.G.; et al. A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km/s/Mpc Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2022, 934, L7–2112.04510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weinberg, S. Ultraviolet divergences in quantum theories of gravitation. In General Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Survey; Hawking, S. W. and Israel, W.., Ed.; Cambridge University Press, 1979; pp. 790–831.
- Reuter, M. Nonperturbative evolution equation for quantum gravity. Phys. Rev. D 1998, 57, 971–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kovács, A.; García-García, C.; Crittenden, R.; Giusarma, E.; Jeffrey, N.; Whiteway, L.; van Waerbeke, L. Hint of a new component of the Universe from the integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 2022, 512, 2569–2585, [2109.06179]. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Euclid Collaboration. ; Amendola, L..; Appleby, S..; Avgoustidis, A..; Bacon, D..; Baker, T..; Baldi, M..; Bartolo, N..; Blanchard, A..; Bonvin, C..; et al. Euclid: A space telescope to map the dark Universe. Living Rev. Relativ. 2020, 23, 2–1810.00493. [Google Scholar]
- Ivezić, Ž.; et al. LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products. Astrophys. J. 2019, 873, 111–0805.2366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DESI Collaboration.; Abbott, T. M. C..; Aguilera-Verdugo, J..; Ahlen, S..; Alam, S..; Allende, S..; Alves de Oliveira, A..; Amriz, A..; Anand, A..; Andrade-Oliveira, F..; et al. Baryon Acoustic Oscillations from the Final Data Release of the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument. arXiv e-prints 2024, p. arXiv:2404.03000, [2404.03000].
- SKA Collaboration. ; Bacon, D. J..; Battye, R. A..; Bull, P..; Camera, S..; Ferreira, P. G..; Harrison, I..; Ma, Y.-Z..; McKean, J..; Pourtsidou, A..; et al. Cosmology with the Square Kilometre Array. PoS 2020, 301, 001–1811.02743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- LISA Collaboration.; Amaro-Seoane, P..; Audley, H..; Babak, S..; Baker, J..; Barausse, E..; Bender, P..; Berti, E..; Binetruy, P..; Born, M..; et al. Laser Interferometer Space Antenna. arXiv e-prints 2017, p. arXiv:1702.00786, [1702.00786].
- Poulin, V.; Smith, T.L.; Karwal, T.; Kamionkowski, M. Early Dark Energy Can Resolve The Hubble Tension. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019, 122, 221301–1811.04083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Milgrom, M. A modification of the Newtonian dynamics as a possible alternative to the hidden mass hypothesis. Astrophys. J. 1983, 270, 365–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blas, D.; Lesgourgues, J.; Tram, T. The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) II: Approximation schemes. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2011, 2011, 034–1104.2933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Springel, V.; Pakmor, R.; Zier, O.; Reinecke, M. Simulating cosmic structure formation with the GADGET-4 code. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 2021, 506, 2857–2884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hunter, J.D. Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment. Comput. Sci. Eng. 2007, 9, 90–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harris, C.R.; Millman, K.J.; van der Walt, S.J.; Gommers, R.; Virtanen, P.; Cournapeau, D.; Wieser, E.; Taylor, J.; Berg, S.; Smith, N.J.; et al. Array programming with NumPy. Nature 2020, 585, 357–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Virtanen, P.; Gommers, R.; Oliphant, T.E.; Haberland, M.; Reddy, T.; Cournapeau, D.; Burovski, E.; Peterson, P.; Weckesser, W.; Bright, J.; et al. SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python. Nat. Methods 2020, 17, 261–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Press, W.H.; Schechter, P. Formation of Galaxies and Clusters of Galaxies by Self-Similar Gravitational Condensation. Astrophys. J. 1974, 187, 425–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]


| Parameter | Planck Anchor | Local Anchor |
|---|---|---|
| (km/s/Mpc) | 67.4 | 73.0 |
| Sound Horizon (Mpc) | 150.6 | 141.7 |
| Comoving Distance (Mpc) | 12219 | 11285 |
| Angular Scale (rad) | 0.01233 | 0.01256 |
| Tension Reduction | 100% | |
| Observable | Phenomenon | Prediction | Primary Survey |
|---|---|---|---|
| Large-Scale Structure | |||
| Halo Mass Function | Enhanced cluster abundance | at | Euclid [7], Vera Rubin Obs. [8] |
| Growth Rate | Enhanced structure growth | % at | DESI [9], Euclid |
| Galaxy Bias | Scale-dependent bias | on large scales | DESI, SKA [10] |
| Cosmic Microwave Background | |||
| ISW Effect | Late-time potential decay | Planck, ACT, SPT | |
| Lensing of CMB | Modified potential landscape | in spectrum | CMB-S4, Simons Obs. |
| Gravitational Waves | |||
| Standard Sirens | Altered GW luminosity distance | at | LISA [11], Einstein Telescope |
| Phase Shift | Propagation through scalar field | rad at mHz | LISA |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).