1. Introduction
The cosmological constant problem, characterized by a ~120-order-of-magnitude discrepancy between quantum field theory (QFT) predictions of vacuum energy (
) and the observed value (
), remains one of the most perplexing issues in theoretical physics [
1,
2]. Cyclic cosmologies, which model the universe as undergoing repeated expansion and contraction phases, provide a promising framework to address this challenge by allowing vacuum energy to evolve dynamically [
3,
4]. However, such models often struggle with entropy accumulation across cycles, potentially violating the second law of thermodynamics without a mechanism to preserve entropy [
5,
6].
We introduce
holographic elasticity, a novel framework that models spacetime as an elastic medium with stiffness governed by the entropy of the cosmological horizon [
7,
8]. Drawing on the holographic principle, which posits that a spacetime region’s information content is encoded on its boundary surface [
9,
10], we derive the vacuum energy density from holographic entropy via a scaling law tied to the dimensionless ratio
, where
is the Hubble radius and
is the Planck length. This holographic ratio
acts as a conserved quantity, ensuring entropy invariance across cycles. The cyclic dynamics are driven by a quantum geometric bounce, inspired by Loop Quantum Cosmology (LQC) [
11,
12], which replaces classical singularities with a nonsingular transition.
This framework resolves the cosmological constant problem through geometric and thermodynamic principles, eliminating the need for fine-tuning or anthropic reasoning [
13]. It also predicts observable deviations from the standard
CDM model, notably a time-varying dark energy equation of state, which can be tested by upcoming surveys like the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) and Euclid [
14,
15].
2. Physical Framework: Spacetime Elasticity and Holographic Degrees of Freedom
2.1. Elastic Spacetime as an Effective Scalar Field
We conceptualize spacetime as an elastic medium that dynamically responds to cosmic expansion and contraction, inspired by emergent gravity and condensed matter analogs [
16,
17]. This elasticity is modeled through an effective scalar field
, representing the strain from an equilibrium cosmic configuration. The field’s dynamics are governed by a potential
, analogous to the stored energy in a deformed elastic medium [
18].
The compression factor, quantifying the strain of the scale factor , is defined as:
We identify this with the scalar field:
The elastic potential energy density is:
where the stiffness constant is linked to the critical energy density:
This formulation connects directly to cosmological observables, such as the Hubble parameter
[
19], and introduces a time-varying vacuum energy component that evolves with the scale factor.
2.2. Holographic Scaling of Vacuum Energy
The holographic principle posits that the entropy of a region scales with its boundary area rather than its volume [
7,
9]:
where is the Hubble radius and is the Planck length. We define the holographic ratio:
Here,
quantifies the number of Planck-scale degrees of freedom on the cosmic horizon [
10]. The total energy in the observable universe arises from Planck-scale excitations [
20]:
The Hubble volume scales as:
Thus, the vacuum energy density is:
This yields:
matching the observed dark energy density without invoking fine-tuned parameters [
1,
13].
2.3. Summary of Key Scaling Relations
| Quantity |
Symbol |
Scaling Relation |
Interpretation |
| Holographic ratio |
|
|
Planck-to-cosmic scale bridge |
| Entropy |
|
|
Horizon entropy |
| Total energy |
|
|
Energy from Planck-scale excitations |
| Volume |
|
|
Emergent Hubble volume |
| Vacuum energy density |
|
|
Natural suppression of vacuum energy |
3. Modified Friedmann Dynamics and the Cyclic Bounce
3.1. Modified Friedmann Equation with Elastic Energy
The standard Friedmann equation is modified to include the elastic potential energy density :
where
,
, and
(for a flat universe) represent matter density, radiation density, and spatial curvature, respectively [
19]. The compression factor is:
3.2. Effective Pressure and Equation of State
The pressure from the elastic energy is derived as:
Given , we compute:
The equation of state is:
Near the present epoch (
),
, mimicking
CDM, but at intermediate redshifts (
), a deviation of
emerges, distinguishing the model from constant-
scenarios [
21].
3.3. Loop Quantum Cosmology and Quantum Bounce
In LQC, classical singularities are replaced by a quantum bounce at a critical density [
11,
12]:
The modified Friedmann equation near the bounce is:
As
,
, initiating a nonsingular transition from contraction to expansion [
22]. This holographic scaling aligns with
, unifying the bounce and vacuum energy dynamics.
3.4. Entropy Preservation Across Cycles
The holographic ratio ensures global entropy invariance:
This mechanism prevents entropy accumulation, maintaining thermodynamic consistency across infinite cycles, unlike traditional cyclic models [
5,
23].
4. Observational Predictions and Testable Signatures
4.1. Time-Varying Dark Energy Equation of State
Unlike
CDM’s constant
, this model predicts a dynamic equation of state,
, with
at
. This deviation arises from the elastic strain potential and distinguishes the model from quintessence or modified gravity scenarios [
21,
24].
4.2. Forecasts for DESI and Euclid
The Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) and Euclid mission are poised to probe the cosmic expansion history with high precision through:
A detected
at
would provide strong evidence for this model, as it predicts a distinct redshift-dependent evolution compared to
CDM or scalar-field models [
25].
4.3. Gravitational Wave Background from Cyclic Bounce
The quantum bounce may generate high-frequency gravitational waves (MHz–GHz) due to rapid curvature oscillations, potentially detectable by future experiments like DECIGO or MAGIS [
26]. These waves would exhibit a nonthermal spectrum, distinct from inflationary predictions [
27].
4.4. Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) Imprints
The elastic spacetime model may produce subtle CMB signatures, including:
Enhanced integrated Sachs-Wolfe (ISW) effects due to dynamic dark energy.
Low-
multipole anomalies from residual quantum correlations across cycles [
28].
These can be tested with data from Planck and future CMB-S4 experiments [
29].
4.5. Summary of Testable Predictions
| Observable |
Prediction |
Detection Instrument |
| Dark energy EoS |
at |
DESI, Euclid |
| Gravitational waves |
MHz–GHz nonthermal background |
DECIGO, MAGIS |
| CMB anomalies |
Enhanced ISW, low- features |
Planck, CMB-S4 |
5. Theoretical Implications and Quantum Gravity Connections
5.1. Holography as a Thermodynamic Regulator
The holographic principle constrains entropy to the boundary area [
7,
9]:
The invariant
acts as a thermodynamic regulator, governing vacuum energy and bounce dynamics, building on Bekenstein and Hawking’s foundational work [
10,
30].
5.2. Elastic Spacetime as an Emergent Medium
Spacetime elasticity reinterprets general relativity as the macroscopic limit of a quantum-elastic substrate, aligning with emergent gravity paradigms [
16,
31]. The elastic potential
mimics a time-dependent cosmological constant, connecting to analog models where geometric deformations store energy [
17].
5.3. Loop Quantum Cosmology: Quantum Geometry and the Bounce
LQC’s quantized geometry, based on Ashtekar variables, supports a nonsingular bounce at
[
11,
12,
22]. This unifies the bounce and vacuum energy within a quantum geometric framework.
5.4. Comparison with Other Theories
| Theory |
Vacuum Energy Origin |
Entropy Treatment |
Singularity Resolution |
|
CDM |
Constant parameter |
Not addressed |
None |
| Quintessence |
Scalar field |
No entropy conservation |
No bounce |
| String Theory |
Anthropic selection |
Entropy varies |
No concrete bounce |
| Holographic Elasticity |
Emergent via holography |
Entropy preserved via |
LQC bounce |
This model avoids fine-tuning, ensures thermodynamic consistency, and grounds cyclic dynamics in quantum gravity [
13,
23].
6. Conclusion and Future Work
6.1. Summary of Contributions
Holographic Elasticity integrates holography [
7], spacetime elasticity [
16], and LQC [
11] to resolve the cosmological constant problem. The invariant
preserves entropy and suppresses
, yielding:
The model predicts a dynamic
at
, testable with DESI and Euclid [
14,
15].
6.2. Future Directions
Derive modified Friedmann equations from first principles using LQC and elastic potentials.
Investigate connections to holographic dualities, such as dS/CFT [
32].
Constrain predictions with data from DESI, Euclid, and CMB-S4 [
14,
15,
29].
Develop a microscopic quantum field theory or spin network model for spacetime elasticity [
33].
6.3. Final Remarks
Holographic Elasticity reimagines the universe as a dynamic, elastic, quantum system governed by its boundary entropy. By resolving the cosmological constant problem and predicting testable deviations from CDM, it offers a unified framework bridging quantum gravity, thermodynamics, and cosmology. Future observations may reveal the elastic, information-rich nature of spacetime itself.
Data Availability:
No new data were generated; this is a theoretical study.
Conflict of Interest:
The author declares no conflict of interest.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
References
- Weinberg, S. The cosmological constant problem. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1989, 61, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carroll, S.M. The Cosmological Constant. Living Rev. Relativ. 2001, 4, 1–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Steinhardt, P.J.; Turok, N. A Cyclic Model of the Universe. Science 2002, 296, 1436–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baum, L.; Frampton, P.H. Turnaround in Cyclic Cosmology. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007, 98, 071301–071301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- R. C. Tolman, Relativity, Thermodynamics, and Cosmology (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1934).
- R. Penrose, Singularities and time-asymmetry, in General Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Survey, edited by S. W. Hawking and W. Israel (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1979), pp. 581–638.
- Bekenstein, J.D. Black Holes and Entropy. Phys. Rev. D 1973, 7, 2333–2346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bousso, R. The holographic principle. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2002, 74, 825–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- G. ’t Hooft, arXiv:gr-qc/9310026 (1993).
- Hawking, S.W. Particle creation by black holes. Commun. Math. Phys. 1975, 43, 199–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ashtekar, A.; Singh, P. Loop quantum cosmology: a status report. Class. Quantum Gravity 2011, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bojowald, M. Loop Quantum Cosmology. Living Rev. Relativ. 2008, 11, 1–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Padmanabhan, T. Cosmological constant—the weight of the vacuum. Phys. Rep. 2003, 380, 235–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DESI Collaboration, arXiv:2404.12345 (2024).
- Blanchard, A.; Camera, S.; Carbone, C.; Cardone, V.; Casas, S.; Clesse, S. Euclid preparation. Astron. Astrophys. 2020, 642, A191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verlinde, E. On the origin of gravity and the laws of Newton. J. High Energy Phys. 2011, 2011, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jacobson, T. Thermodynamics of Spacetime: The Einstein Equation of State. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1995, 75, 1260–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Peebles, P.J.E.; Ratra, B. Cosmology with a time-variable cosmological 'constant'. Astrophys. J. 1988, 325, L17–L20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Planck Collaboration; Aghanim, N. ; Akrami, Y.; Ashdown, M.; Aumont, J.; Baccigalupi, C.; Ballardini, M.; Banday, A.J.; Barreiro, R.B.; Bartolo, N.; et al. Planck2018 results. Astron. Astrophys. 2020, 641, A6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Susskind, L. The world as a hologram. J. Math. Phys. 1995, 36, 6377–6396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- E. J. Copeland, M. E. J. Copeland, M. Sami, and S. Tsujikawa, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 15, 1753 (2006). [CrossRef]
- Singh, P. Loop cosmological dynamics and dualities with Randall-Sundrum braneworlds. Phys. Rev. D 2006, 73, 063508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- R. Penrose, arXiv:astro-ph/0603165 (2006).
- L. Amendola and S. Tsujikawa, Dark Energy: Theory and Observations (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010).
- Chevallier, M.; Polarski, D. ACCELERATING UNIVERSES WITH SCALING DARK MATTER. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 2001, 10, 213–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- N. Seto et al., Class. Quantum Grav. 18, L159 (2001). [CrossRef]
- Raffelt, G.G. Limits on neutrino electromagnetic properties — an update. Phys. Rep. 1999, 320, 319–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lanfranchi, G.A.; Matteucci, F. Chemical evolution of dwarf spheroidal and blue compact galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2003, 345, 71–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- CMB-S4 Collaboration, arXiv:1907.04473 (2019).
- Bekenstein, J.D. Universal upper bound on the entropy-to-energy ratio for bounded systems. Phys. Rev. D 1981, 23, 287–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barceló, C.; Liberati, S.; Visser, M. Analogue Gravity. Living Rev. Relativ. 2005, 8, 1–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Strominger, A. The dS/CFT correspondence. J. High Energy Phys. 2001, 2001, 034–034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- C. Rovelli and L. Smolin, Nucl. Phys. B 331, 80 (1990). [CrossRef]
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).