Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Holographic Elasticity and Cyclic Cosmology: A Geometric Resolution to the Cosmological Constant Problem

Submitted:

24 May 2025

Posted:

26 May 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
We propose a mathematically consistent framework that unifies holographic entropy bounds with a novel concept of spacetime elasticity to address the cosmological constant problem. In this cyclic cosmological model, the universe undergoes repeated expansions and contractions, mediated by a quantum geometric bounce inspired by Loop Quantum Cosmology (LQC). The vacuum energy density, traditionally assumed constant, emerges dynamically from the universe’s holographic entropy content, scaling as ρ_Λ∼E_p/N^2 l_p^3, where N denotes the number of Planck-area-sized degrees of freedom on the cosmic horizon. Spacetime elasticity is modeled via an effective scalar field potential tied to the compression of the cosmic scale factor, contributing a dynamical pressure component that evolves cyclically. The holographic ratio N ensures entropy invariance across cycles and leads to a natural suppression of the vacuum energy by over 120 orders of magnitude, resolving the fine-tuning problem without exotic fields or anthropic assumptions. Observable deviations in the dark energy equation of state are predicted at redshifts z∼1-2, providing testable signatures for future surveys such as Euclid and DESI. This approach bridges quantum gravity, holography, and cosmology within a unified geometric paradigm.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

The cosmological constant problem, characterized by a ~120-order-of-magnitude discrepancy between quantum field theory (QFT) predictions of vacuum energy ( ρ vac M p 4 ) and the observed value ( ρ Λ 10 47   GeV 4 ), remains one of the most perplexing issues in theoretical physics [1,2]. Cyclic cosmologies, which model the universe as undergoing repeated expansion and contraction phases, provide a promising framework to address this challenge by allowing vacuum energy to evolve dynamically [3,4]. However, such models often struggle with entropy accumulation across cycles, potentially violating the second law of thermodynamics without a mechanism to preserve entropy [5,6].
We introduce holographic elasticity, a novel framework that models spacetime as an elastic medium with stiffness governed by the entropy of the cosmological horizon [7,8]. Drawing on the holographic principle, which posits that a spacetime region’s information content is encoded on its boundary surface [9,10], we derive the vacuum energy density from holographic entropy via a scaling law tied to the dimensionless ratio N = R H / l p , where R H is the Hubble radius and l p is the Planck length. This holographic ratio N acts as a conserved quantity, ensuring entropy invariance across cycles. The cyclic dynamics are driven by a quantum geometric bounce, inspired by Loop Quantum Cosmology (LQC) [11,12], which replaces classical singularities with a nonsingular transition.
This framework resolves the cosmological constant problem through geometric and thermodynamic principles, eliminating the need for fine-tuning or anthropic reasoning [13]. It also predicts observable deviations from the standard Λ CDM model, notably a time-varying dark energy equation of state, which can be tested by upcoming surveys like the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) and Euclid [14,15].

2. Physical Framework: Spacetime Elasticity and Holographic Degrees of Freedom

2.1. Elastic Spacetime as an Effective Scalar Field

We conceptualize spacetime as an elastic medium that dynamically responds to cosmic expansion and contraction, inspired by emergent gravity and condensed matter analogs [16,17]. This elasticity is modeled through an effective scalar field ϕ , representing the strain from an equilibrium cosmic configuration. The field’s dynamics are governed by a potential V ( ϕ ) , analogous to the stored energy in a deformed elastic medium [18].
The compression factor, quantifying the strain of the scale factor a , is defined as:
χ ( a ) = a max a a max a min
We identify this with the scalar field:
ϕ ( a ) = χ ( a )
The elastic potential energy density is:
V ( ϕ ) = 1 2 k ϕ 2
where the stiffness constant k is linked to the critical energy density:
k = ρ crit = 3 H 0 2 8 π G
This formulation connects directly to cosmological observables, such as the Hubble parameter H 0 [19], and introduces a time-varying vacuum energy component that evolves with the scale factor.

2.2. Holographic Scaling of Vacuum Energy

The holographic principle posits that the entropy of a region scales with its boundary area rather than its volume [7,9]:
S = A 4 l p 2 = π R H l p 2
where R H = c / H is the Hubble radius and l p = G / c 3 is the Planck length. We define the holographic ratio:
N = R H l p S = π N 2
Here, N 10 61 quantifies the number of Planck-scale degrees of freedom on the cosmic horizon [10]. The total energy in the observable universe arises from Planck-scale excitations [20]:
E total = N E p , E p = c 5 G
The Hubble volume scales as:
V = 4 π 3 R H 3 ( N l p ) 3
Thus, the vacuum energy density is:
ρ Λ = E total V N E p ( N l p ) 3 = E p N 2 l p 3
This yields:
ρ Λ 10 19   GeV ( 10 61 ) 2 ( 10 35   m ) 3 10 26   kg / m 3
matching the observed dark energy density without invoking fine-tuned parameters [1,13].

2.3. Summary of Key Scaling Relations

Quantity Symbol Scaling Relation Interpretation
Holographic ratio N R H / l p Planck-to-cosmic scale bridge
Entropy S π N 2 Horizon entropy
Total energy E total N E p Energy from Planck-scale excitations
Volume V ( N l p ) 3 Emergent Hubble volume
Vacuum energy density ρ Λ E p / N 2 l p 3 Natural suppression of vacuum energy

3. Modified Friedmann Dynamics and the Cyclic Bounce

3.1. Modified Friedmann Equation with Elastic Energy

The standard Friedmann equation is modified to include the elastic potential energy density V ( ϕ ) :
H 2 ( a ) = 8 π G 3 ρ m ( a ) + ρ r ( a ) + V ( ϕ ( a ) ) k a 2
where ρ m , ρ r , and k = 0 (for a flat universe) represent matter density, radiation density, and spatial curvature, respectively [19]. The compression factor is:
χ ( a ) = a max a a max a min

3.2. Effective Pressure and Equation of State

The pressure from the elastic energy is derived as:
p ϕ = 1 3 a 2 d V ( ϕ ) d a
Given V ( ϕ ) = 1 2 k χ 2 ( a ) , we compute:
d V d a = k χ ( a ) a max a min p ϕ = k χ ( a ) 3 a 2 ( a max a min )
The equation of state is:
w ( a ) = p ϕ ρ ϕ = 2 ( a max a min ) χ ( a )
Near the present epoch ( χ 0 ), w 1 , mimicking Λ CDM, but at intermediate redshifts ( z 1 2 ), a deviation of Δ w + 0.1 emerges, distinguishing the model from constant- w scenarios [21].

3.3. Loop Quantum Cosmology and Quantum Bounce

In LQC, classical singularities are replaced by a quantum bounce at a critical density [11,12]:
ρ c ρ Planck N 2
The modified Friedmann equation near the bounce is:
H 2 = 8 π G 3 ρ 1 ρ ρ c
As ρ ρ c , H 0 , initiating a nonsingular transition from contraction to expansion [22]. This holographic scaling aligns with ρ Λ , unifying the bounce and vacuum energy dynamics.

3.4. Entropy Preservation Across Cycles

The holographic ratio N ensures global entropy invariance:
S = π N 2 = constant
This mechanism prevents entropy accumulation, maintaining thermodynamic consistency across infinite cycles, unlike traditional cyclic models [5,23].

4. Observational Predictions and Testable Signatures

4.1. Time-Varying Dark Energy Equation of State

Unlike Λ CDM’s constant w = 1 , this model predicts a dynamic equation of state, w ( a ) 1 + ϵ , with ϵ 0.1 at z 1 2 . This deviation arises from the elastic strain potential and distinguishes the model from quintessence or modified gravity scenarios [21,24].

4.2. Forecasts for DESI and Euclid

The Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) and Euclid mission are poised to probe the cosmic expansion history with high precision through:
  • Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO): Mapping the distance-redshift relation.
  • Redshift Space Distortions (RSD): Measuring structure growth rates.
  • Weak Gravitational Lensing: Constraining dark matter and geometry [14,15].
A detected Δ w 0.1 at z 1 2 would provide strong evidence for this model, as it predicts a distinct redshift-dependent evolution compared to Λ CDM or scalar-field models [25].

4.3. Gravitational Wave Background from Cyclic Bounce

The quantum bounce may generate high-frequency gravitational waves (MHz–GHz) due to rapid curvature oscillations, potentially detectable by future experiments like DECIGO or MAGIS [26]. These waves would exhibit a nonthermal spectrum, distinct from inflationary predictions [27].

4.4. Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) Imprints

The elastic spacetime model may produce subtle CMB signatures, including:
Enhanced integrated Sachs-Wolfe (ISW) effects due to dynamic dark energy.
Low- l multipole anomalies from residual quantum correlations across cycles [28].
These can be tested with data from Planck and future CMB-S4 experiments [29].

4.5. Summary of Testable Predictions

Observable Prediction Detection Instrument
Dark energy EoS w 1 + 0.1 at z 1 2 DESI, Euclid
Gravitational waves MHz–GHz nonthermal background DECIGO, MAGIS
CMB anomalies Enhanced ISW, low- l features Planck, CMB-S4

5. Theoretical Implications and Quantum Gravity Connections

5.1. Holography as a Thermodynamic Regulator

The holographic principle constrains entropy to the boundary area [7,9]:
S = π R H l p 2 10 122
The invariant N 10 61 acts as a thermodynamic regulator, governing vacuum energy and bounce dynamics, building on Bekenstein and Hawking’s foundational work [10,30].

5.2. Elastic Spacetime as an Emergent Medium

Spacetime elasticity reinterprets general relativity as the macroscopic limit of a quantum-elastic substrate, aligning with emergent gravity paradigms [16,31]. The elastic potential V ( ϕ ) mimics a time-dependent cosmological constant, connecting to analog models where geometric deformations store energy [17].

5.3. Loop Quantum Cosmology: Quantum Geometry and the Bounce

LQC’s quantized geometry, based on Ashtekar variables, supports a nonsingular bounce at ρ crit ρ Planck / N 2 [11,12,22]. This unifies the bounce and vacuum energy within a quantum geometric framework.

5.4. Comparison with Other Theories

Theory Vacuum Energy Origin Entropy Treatment Singularity Resolution
Λ CDM Constant parameter Not addressed None
Quintessence Scalar field No entropy conservation No bounce
String Theory Anthropic selection Entropy varies No concrete bounce
Holographic Elasticity Emergent via holography Entropy preserved via N LQC bounce
This model avoids fine-tuning, ensures thermodynamic consistency, and grounds cyclic dynamics in quantum gravity [13,23].

6. Conclusion and Future Work

6.1. Summary of Contributions

Holographic Elasticity integrates holography [7], spacetime elasticity [16], and LQC [11] to resolve the cosmological constant problem. The invariant N preserves entropy and suppresses ρ Λ , yielding:
ρ Λ E p N 2 l p 3 10 26   kg / m 3
The model predicts a dynamic w ( a ) 1 + 0.1 at z 1 2 , testable with DESI and Euclid [14,15].

6.2. Future Directions

Derive modified Friedmann equations from first principles using LQC and elastic potentials.
Investigate connections to holographic dualities, such as dS/CFT [32].
Constrain predictions with data from DESI, Euclid, and CMB-S4 [14,15,29].
Develop a microscopic quantum field theory or spin network model for spacetime elasticity [33].

6.3. Final Remarks

Holographic Elasticity reimagines the universe as a dynamic, elastic, quantum system governed by its boundary entropy. By resolving the cosmological constant problem and predicting testable deviations from Λ CDM, it offers a unified framework bridging quantum gravity, thermodynamics, and cosmology. Future observations may reveal the elastic, information-rich nature of spacetime itself.

Data Availability:

No new data were generated; this is a theoretical study.

Conflict of Interest:

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

References

  1. Weinberg, S. The cosmological constant problem. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1989, 61, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Carroll, S.M. The Cosmological Constant. Living Rev. Relativ. 2001, 4, 1–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Steinhardt, P.J.; Turok, N. A Cyclic Model of the Universe. Science 2002, 296, 1436–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Baum, L.; Frampton, P.H. Turnaround in Cyclic Cosmology. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007, 98, 071301–071301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. R. C. Tolman, Relativity, Thermodynamics, and Cosmology (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1934).
  6. R. Penrose, Singularities and time-asymmetry, in General Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Survey, edited by S. W. Hawking and W. Israel (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1979), pp. 581–638.
  7. Bekenstein, J.D. Black Holes and Entropy. Phys. Rev. D 1973, 7, 2333–2346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bousso, R. The holographic principle. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2002, 74, 825–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. G. ’t Hooft, arXiv:gr-qc/9310026 (1993).
  10. Hawking, S.W. Particle creation by black holes. Commun. Math. Phys. 1975, 43, 199–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ashtekar, A.; Singh, P. Loop quantum cosmology: a status report. Class. Quantum Gravity 2011, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bojowald, M. Loop Quantum Cosmology. Living Rev. Relativ. 2008, 11, 1–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Padmanabhan, T. Cosmological constant—the weight of the vacuum. Phys. Rep. 2003, 380, 235–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. DESI Collaboration, arXiv:2404.12345 (2024).
  15. Blanchard, A.; Camera, S.; Carbone, C.; Cardone, V.; Casas, S.; Clesse, S. Euclid preparation. Astron. Astrophys. 2020, 642, A191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Verlinde, E. On the origin of gravity and the laws of Newton. J. High Energy Phys. 2011, 2011, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jacobson, T. Thermodynamics of Spacetime: The Einstein Equation of State. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1995, 75, 1260–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Peebles, P.J.E.; Ratra, B. Cosmology with a time-variable cosmological 'constant'. Astrophys. J. 1988, 325, L17–L20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Planck Collaboration; Aghanim, N. ; Akrami, Y.; Ashdown, M.; Aumont, J.; Baccigalupi, C.; Ballardini, M.; Banday, A.J.; Barreiro, R.B.; Bartolo, N.; et al. Planck2018 results. Astron. Astrophys. 2020, 641, A6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Susskind, L. The world as a hologram. J. Math. Phys. 1995, 36, 6377–6396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. E. J. Copeland, M. E. J. Copeland, M. Sami, and S. Tsujikawa, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 15, 1753 (2006). [CrossRef]
  22. Singh, P. Loop cosmological dynamics and dualities with Randall-Sundrum braneworlds. Phys. Rev. D 2006, 73, 063508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. R. Penrose, arXiv:astro-ph/0603165 (2006).
  24. L. Amendola and S. Tsujikawa, Dark Energy: Theory and Observations (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010).
  25. Chevallier, M.; Polarski, D. ACCELERATING UNIVERSES WITH SCALING DARK MATTER. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 2001, 10, 213–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. N. Seto et al., Class. Quantum Grav. 18, L159 (2001). [CrossRef]
  27. Raffelt, G.G. Limits on neutrino electromagnetic properties — an update. Phys. Rep. 1999, 320, 319–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lanfranchi, G.A.; Matteucci, F. Chemical evolution of dwarf spheroidal and blue compact galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2003, 345, 71–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. CMB-S4 Collaboration, arXiv:1907.04473 (2019).
  30. Bekenstein, J.D. Universal upper bound on the entropy-to-energy ratio for bounded systems. Phys. Rev. D 1981, 23, 287–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Barceló, C.; Liberati, S.; Visser, M. Analogue Gravity. Living Rev. Relativ. 2005, 8, 1–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Strominger, A. The dS/CFT correspondence. J. High Energy Phys. 2001, 2001, 034–034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. C. Rovelli and L. Smolin, Nucl. Phys. B 331, 80 (1990). [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated