1. Introduction
Laying duck industry serves as a pivotal pillar of China’s agricultural economy. In the context of its rapid development, key industry concerns now revolve around enhancing production performance, optimizing egg quality, improving the nutritional value of duck eggs, reducing antibiotic usage, and achieving green and sustainable development. Amid growing concerns over antibiotic resistance and drug residues in products resulting from the widespread use of antibiotics, the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People’s Republic of China issued Announcement No. 194, explicitly mandating the cessation of production of commercial feed containing growth-promoting drug feed additives (except for traditional Chinese herbs) starting from July 2020. Against this backdrop, numerous studies have begun exploring the potential of plant-derived feed additives based on traditional Chinese herbs or plant extracts as alternatives to antibiotics, aiming to maintain or improve the health and production performance of poultry[
1,
2,
3].
Phytogenic feed additives (PFA) refer to plant-derived components or extracts that exhibit pharmacological activities such as growth promotion, antiviral, antibacterial, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory effects. Due to their environmentally friendly characteristics and multiple biological activities, PFA have garnered widespread attention. Research demonstrates that these additives can significantly enhance laying performance in poultry, improve egg quality, and strengthen antioxidant capacity in laying hens[
4,
5,
6,
7].
Fagopyrum dibotrys (F. dibotrys) (D. Don) Hara, a traditional Chinese medicinal herb, is renowned for its dried rhizome, which exhibits therapeutic properties such as heat-clearing, detoxification, lung health promotion, phlegm resolution, and swelling reduction. It is commonly employed in the treatment of various conditions, including acute lung injury[
8], cardiovascular diseases[
9], kidney or liver damage[
10,
11], and bronchial asthma[
12]. Modern pharmacological studies have revealed that the rhizoma of
F. dibotrys contains a diverse array of chemical constituents, including flavonoids, phenols, fagopyrin, triterpenoids, fatty acids, and steroids[
13,
14,
15]. These compounds confer a wide range of bioactive properties, such as anti-inflammatory, anticancer, antioxidant, antimicrobial, immunomodulatory, and antidiabetic effects[
16,
17,
18]. In livestock production, F. dibotrys serves as a high-value feed additive, demonstrating multiple benefits in poultry farming. When incorporated into poultry diets, it significantly enhances laying performance (e.g., laying rate and average daily feed intake) and improves egg quality, including shell strength, yolk color, and Haugh units. Additionally, it enriches the nutritional value of eggs by increasing unsaturated fatty acids and essential amino acids content. Beyond productivity enhancement,
F. dibotrys modulates serum biochemical indices (e.g., immunoglobulin levels), thereby boosting immunity and disease resistance in laying hens. This reduces disease incidence and antibiotic dependency, ensuring sustainable and healthy production[
19,
20]. Nutritionally,
F. dibotrys is characterized by its high crude protein content, balanced essential amino acids, abundance of trace minerals, and high digestibility, making it well-suited for animal digestion and absorption. It demonstrates significant efficacy in enhancing dietary protein utilization efficiency and serum antioxidant indices in livestock[
21]. Moreover, its stems and leaves can be processed into non-conventional feed ingredients, offering a potential solution to alleviate the current shortage of feed resources[
22,
23]. Given these advantages, exploring the application of
F. dibotrys rhizoma meal (FDRM) as a plant-derived feed additive in laying duck production may provide a novel strategy to improve production efficiency, reduce antibiotic dependence, and enhance overall livestock health.
Nevertheless, based on our knowledge, literature investigating the effect of FDRM in laying ducks’ diet is very scarce. The optimal inclusion level, mechanisms of action, and its effects on productive performance, egg quality, nutritional value of eggs, and serum biochemical parameters still require systematic evaluation. China has a large scale production of traditional Chinese herbs or plant extracts for years. Therefore, it is important to utilize these herbal resources as feed ingredient and unveil their potential economic value in feed industry. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the effects of FDRM on productive performance, egg quality, nutritional value of eggs, and serum biochemical parameters of laying ducks. The findings are expected to provide theoretical foundations and practical references for healthy duck farming, while promoting the sustainable utilization of natural plant resources in livestock and poultry production.
2. Materials and Methods
The experimental use of animals and related procedures were performed according to the Chinese Guidelines for Animal Welfare and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Jiangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Ethical Committee Number: 2025-JXAAS-XM-18).
2.1. Experimental Materials
The Fagopyrum dibotrys rhizoma meal (FDRM) used in this study was provided by Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Fresh F. dibotrys rhizomata were selected, dried naturally, crushed and passed through the 80-mesh screen to prepare FDRM. The main bioactive compounds of FDRM are flavonoids and polyphenols, determined by spectrophotometric method, which the contents are 19.6 mg/g and 63.85 mg/g respectively. Moreover, the FDRM (dry basis) in this experiment contained the following nutrients: gross energy 15.48 MJ/kg, dry matter 86.40 %, crude protein 4.03%, crude fat 0.30%, crude fiber 14.10%, crude Ash 4.10%, calcium 0.41%, and total phosphorus 0.31%.
2.2. Ducks, Experimental Design and Treatments
This study was conducted on 32-weeks-old Longyan Shanma laying ducks for a 49-day period with a completely randomized design. A total of 512 laying ducks with similar productive performance (80.88 ± 5.17 %) and body weight (1.24 ± 0.02 kg) were used in this experiment. Ducks were randomly allocated to 4 groups with 8 replicates per group and 16 ducks per replicate (128 laying ducks per group). The control group (F0) was fed a basal diet, and the experimental groups were fed diets supplemented with 1% (F1), 2% (F2), and 3% (F3) of FDRM, respectively. all experimental diets were formulated to contain same nutrient levels.
2.3. Diets and Management
This trial was carried out at the test field of laying ducks in Gaoan, Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Science, Jiangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, PR China. The basal diet fed animals was corn-soybean meal diet, which was formulated based on the China's national standard “nutrient requirements for egg duck” (GB/T 41189-2021) to meet the nutrient requirements of Longyan Shanma ducks.
Table 1 presents the composition and nutrient levels of experimental diets. The experimental laying ducks were raised in three-layer three-dimensional netting, consisted of 4 adjacent cages (40 × 38 × 38 cm; length × width × height) with 2 animals per cage, providing 28,880 cm
3 per animal in closed fully automated duck house. Each replicate was raised on the upper and middle floors and each groups were guaranteed to be equal in the number of distributed upper and middle layers. During the period of study, the housing temperature and relative humidity were 23.0 ± 2 ℃ and 55 to75 %, respectively. Furthermore, the photoperiod was set at 16L:8D through a 49-d experimental period. Animals were kept with ad libitum access to feed and water during the entire experimental period. The management, procedures of immunization and sanitation and disinfection of the test ducks were carried out in accordance with the standard breeding system.
2.4. Productive Performance
Throughout the trial, the ducks' egg production and egg weight were monitored daily, and feed consumption was meticulously recorded on a replicate basis at weekly intervals. At the end of the feeding trial, these values were allowed to analyze the daily egg weight (DEW), average egg weight (AEW), laying rate (LR), average daily feed intake (ADFI) and the ratio of feed to egg (F/E) of the ducks for the 49-d feeding period.
2.5. Egg Quality
At the last day of the experiment, eight freshly laid eggs were randomly collected for each repeat, which were used for conventional egg quality analysis (within 48 h after laying), including shape index, shell strength, shell thickness, haugh unit, yolk color, vitellus proportion, albumen proportion and shell proportion. The egg shape index was calculated by a caliper marked at 0.01mm intervals and was represented by the formula shape index (SI) = (egg length/egg width)[
24]. Shell strength was measured on the vertical axis using a compression tester (EFG-0503, Robotmation, Tokyo, Japan). The shell thickness was determined (excluding shell membrane) using a micrometer with the least count of 0.01 mm and was expressed by the mean value of measurements from three locations (air cell, equator, and sharp end) of the egg. Haugh unit, yolk color and albumen height were analyzed by an Egg Multi-tester (EMT-5200, Robotmation Tokyo, Japan). The vitellus, albumen and shell were isolated and weighed to calculate their percentages of egg weight.
2.6. Egg Nutritional Value
After measuring the egg physical parameters, the vitelluses were collected and freeze-dried for further analyses of egg conventional nutrition, amino acid composition and fatty acids profile. The egg conventional nutrition, including moisture, crude protein (CP), crude fat, cholesterol and Ca were determined in accordance with AOAC methods [
25]. Crude protein (N x 6.25) content was measured by determining crude nitrogen content using the Kjeldahl method. Ether extract was measured using the Soxhlet method. The method for the Ca and cholesterol determination were used by an ultraviolet spectrophotometer and commercial kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China) as described by Zhang et al.[
26]. According to the methods reported by Cullere et al.[
27], the amino acids content and fatty acids profile of the eggs were analyzed.
2.7. Serum Biochemical Parameters
At the end of the 8 weeks, two laying ducks with close to the average weight were randomly selected from each replicate for collection of 5 mL of fasting blood samples from the wing vein. The blood samples were centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 10 minutes, and the serum was separated and stored at -20°C for further use. The serum levels of triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) were measured using commercial assay kits. Additionally, the levels of total protein (TP), albumin (ALB), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), alkaline phosphatase (AKP), and calcium (Ca) were determined. All assay kits were provided by the Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute.
2.8. Statistical Analyses
All data were organized using Excel 2013, and then subjected to a one-way analysis of variance (One-Way ANOVA) using the Bonferroni method in SPSS 22.0 statistical software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) to test for multiple comparisons. The experimental results were presented as mean and pooled SEM. A value of P<0.05 was considered statistically significant, while a value of 0.05<P<0.10 indicated a trend towards an increase or decrease.
4. Discussion
In recent years, numerous studies have strongly supported the view that Chinese herbal medicines or plant extracts exert positive effects on poultry and livestock such as laying ducks, laying hens, geese, and broilers. These studies emphasize that phytogenic feed additives not only improve production performance, egg quality, intestinal health and egg nutritional value, but also increase dietary protein utilization, serum immunity and antioxidant capacityt[
21,
24,
28,
29,
30,
31,
32,
33,
34,
35]. This experiment aimed to investigate the effects of dietary supplementation with FDRM on laying performance, egg quality, egg nutritional value and serum biochemical indicators of
Shanma laying ducks. In our study, we observed a series of positive effects of FDRM supplementation on laying ducks. These included significant increases in shell strength, yolk color, and shell proportion, while no significant impact was found on laying performance. Furthermore, the study also demonstrated that FDRM supplementation improved the nutritional value of eggs by increasing the content of unsaturated fatty acids and amino acids in the yolk while reducing saturated fatty acid levels. These findings indicate that dietary supplementation with FDRM had no adverse effects on laying performance of
Shanma laying ducks,while concurrently improving the nutritional quality of eggs. Additionally, serum biochemical indicators revealed that FDRM supplementation significantly increased serum TP content and enhanced serum calcium concentrations. The aforementioned findings indicate that FDRM exhibits potential benefits in enhancing metabolic pathways associated with protein synthesis, consequently leading to improved the quality and nutritional value of duck eggs.
Numerous phytogenic feed additives, including
Eucommia ulmoides leaf extract, peppermint leaf powder,
Moringa oleifera leaf flavonoids, licorice extract, yucca schidigera extract, mulberry leaf extract,
Lonicera confusa and
Astragali radix extracts, as well as pine needle and
Artemisia annua blends, have been demonstrated to possess potential health-regulating effects in laying hens. Scientific investigations reveal that these herbal formulations and their bioactive constituents not only enhance follicular development through endocrine modulation (e.g., estrogen level), deepen yolk pigmentation, and improve laying performance along with egg quality, but also exhibit multifaceted biological activities including antioxidant, immunomodulatory and gut health-impronement[
26,
36,
37,
38,
39,
40,
41,
42]. Collectively, FDRM demonstrates potential as a phytogenic feed additive for enhancing animal productivity and overall health status through modulation of intestinal ecosystem homeostasis and potentiation of immune system functionality[
1,
15,
22]. Notably, current utilization and research on FDRM primarily focus on pharmaceutical formulations, nutraceutical products, functional beverages, and partial replacement in swine diets, while investigations of its rhizomata (medicinal organs) are predominantly limited to broiler applications. Crucially, the application of FDRM in laying duck production remains poorly documented. This study was therefore designed to systematically evaluate the efficacy of FDRM as a phytogenic feed additive in laying duck production, aiming to establish novel strategies for optimizing production efficiency and mitigating antibiotic dependency in poultry farming systems.
Our findings demonstrate that dietary supplementation with FDRM did not significantly affect daily egg weight, average egg weight, daily egg number, laying rate, average daily feed intake, and the ratio of feed to egg in laying ducks, but markedly enhanced shell strength and yolk coloration. This aligns with previous reports where supplementation of
Lonicera japonica and
Astragalus membranaceus extracts during late laying phases showed no impact on egg production, egg weight, and feed conversion ratio, yet significantly improved yolk pigmentation and sensory quality[
41]. In contrast, Chen, et al. [
24] and Feng, et al. [
43] reported that dietary supplementation with honeycomb extracts and
Eucommia ulmoides leaf powder in laying ducks have no significant improvements in production performance and egg quality. Similarly, in the study by Torki, et al. [
44], it was observed that no significant differences in egg weight, egg index, yolk index, Haugh units, egg shell weight and egg shell thickness, in response to dietary supplementation with
Lavandula angustifolia and/or
Mentha spicata essential oils. These discrepancies might be attributed to variations in extracts types, poultry breeds and diets. Given the limited existing research on FDRM in laying duck nutrition, further mechanistic investigations are warranted to elucidate its functional properties.
Duck eggs, containing abundant protein and amino acids, fatty acids, minerals and vitamins, serve as an excellent source of essential nutrients for human food and health. The primary indicators for assessing their nutritional value and sensory quality typically encompass amino acid composition and fatty acid profiles[
19,
24]. As fundamental building blocks of life, essential amino acids (EAAs) such as lysine (Lys), methionine (Met), threonine (Thr), and phenylalanine (Phe) not only play critical roles in regulating lipid and protein metabolism but also constitute indispensable nutrients that cannot be endogenously synthesized by animals and must be supplemented through dietary intake[
45]. This study revealed that compared to the control group (F0 group), the 2% FDRM-supplemented group (F2 group) significantly increased the contents of total amino acids (by 9.27%), total essential amino acids (by 9.34%), and umami amino acids (by 7.62%) in egg yolks, confirming the beneficial effect of FDRM on the nutritional value of duck eggs. The potential underlying mechanisms may involve enhancing antioxidant capacity and modulating the expression of genes related to amino acid metabolism[
46]. Notably,Yao, et al. [
7] also reported that sea buckthorn extract significantly improved the contents of total amino acids, essential amino acids, and umami amino acids in eggs through a similar mechanism. Nevertheless, current research remains insufficient in identifying the specific bioactive components within FDRM and their molecular targets, which represents a critical focus for future investigations. Accumulating evidence highlights the dual implications of fatty acid intake on human health. Research suggests that consuming excessive saturated fatty acids (SFAs) may increase the risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases, whereas unsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs/PUFAs) exhibit multiple health benefits, including anti-inflammatory effects, regulation of glucose and lipid metabolism, and promotion of muscle growth [
47,
48]. In the present trial, adding FDRM in laying duck diet led to an increase in the ratio of unsaturated to saturated fatty acids (UFAs:SFAs) and a decrease in total SFAs in egg yolks, with the 2% FDRM group showing a pronounced decrease in total SFAs. The study by Chen, et al. [
24] demonstrated that the contents of total unsaturated fatty acids (UFAs), monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs), and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) in duck eggs showed an increasing trend with the dietary supplementation level of honeycomb extracts, while the total saturated fatty acids (SFAs) content decreased significantly. These findings are highly consistent with the conclusions of the present study.
Serum biochemical parameters serve as critical indicators for assessing metabolic status and health conditions in animals, primarily encompassing serum enzymes, protein and lipid metabolites. Serum TP, composed of ALB and GLB, reflects protein absorption and metabolism in the body. Elevated TP levels indicate enhanced protein metabolism and immune competence[
49,
50,
51]. The results of this trial demonstrated that supplementation with FDRM significantly increased the serum TP content, aligning with findings reported by Chen, et al. [
50] and Zhang, et al. [
19]. Serum BUN levels serve as an indicator of protein and amino acid utilization, with decreased concentrations suggesting favorable amino acids balance[
52]. Tan, et al. [
51] discovered that dietary
Fagopyrum dibotrys supplementation with 1% in broilers decreased the serum BUN levels. However, this study revealed that the 3% FDRM supplementation group significantly elevated the serum BUN content compared to the control group, diverging from the aforementioned findings. This discrepancy suggests that dietary FDRM supplementation should not exceed 3%, as higher levels may compromise protein utilization efficiency.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, P.X., X.C. and L.H.; Methodology, P.X., G.A. and J.C.; Software, Q.S., C.X. and W.So.; Validation, Z.Z., Q.W. and W.Su.; Formal analysis, G.A., J.C., Q.S. and C.X.; Investigation, P.X.,W.So.and Q.S.; Data curation, C.X., W.So. and W.Su.; Writing–Original Draft Preparation, P.X., G.A. and J.C.; Writing–Review & Editing, X.C. L.H., Q.S.,W.So. and D.Y.; Visualization, P.X., Z.Z., Q.W., D.Y. and W.Su.; Supervision, P.X., Z.Z., Q.W., D.Y. and W.Su.; Project administration, Z.Z., Q.W., D.Y. and W.Su.; Funding Acquisition, X.C. and L.H.. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.