Submitted:
23 June 2025
Posted:
26 June 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental Materials
2.2. Ducks, Experimental Design and Treatments
2.3. Diets and Management
2.4. Productive Performance
2.5. Egg Quality
2.6. Egg Nutritional Value
2.7. Serum Biochemical Parameters
2.8. Statistical Analyses
3. Results
3.1. Productive Performance
3.2. Egg Quality
3.3. Egg Nutritional Value
3.3.1. Nutrient Composition of Egg
3.3.2. Amino Acids Composition
3.3.3. Fatty Acids Profile
3.4. Serum Biochemical Parameters
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Chen, X.; Xiong, P.; Song, W.; Song, Q.; Zou, Z.; Huang, J.; Chen, J.; Xu, C.; Su, W.; Ai, G.; et al. Dietary supplementation with honeycomb extracts positively improved egg nutritional and flavor quality, serum antioxidant and immune functions of laying ducks. Front. Veter- Sci. 2023, 10, 1277293. [CrossRef]
- Liu, B.; Ma, R.; Yang, Q.; Yang, Y.; Fang, Y.; Sun, Z.; Song, D. Effects of Traditional Chinese Herbal Feed Additive on Production Performance, Egg Quality, Antioxidant Capacity, Immunity and Intestinal Health of Laying Hens. Animals 2023, 13, 2510. [CrossRef]
- Shen, S.-Y.; Lin, Y.-Y.; Liao, S.-C.; Wang, J.-S.; Wang, S.-D.; Ching-Yi, L. Effects of phytogenic feed additives on the growth, blood biochemistry, and caecal microorganisms of White Roman geese. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2023, 68, 202–211. [CrossRef]
- Song, W.; Chen, J.; Ai, G.; Xiong, P.; Song, Q.; Wei, Q.; Zou, Z.; Chen, X. Mechanisms of the effects of turpiniae folium extract on growth performance, immunity, antioxidant activity and intestinal barrier function in LPS-challenged broilers. Poult. Sci. 2025, 104, 104903. [CrossRef]
- Song, W.; Zou, Z.; Chen, X.; Tan, J.; Liu, L.; Wei, Q.; Xiong, P.; Song, Q.; Chen, J.; Su, W.; et al. Effects of traditional Chinese herbal feed supplement on growth performance, immunity, antioxidant levels, and intestinal health in chickens: a study on Ningdu yellow chickens. Poult. Sci. 2023, 102, 102986. [CrossRef]
- Song, Q.L.; Zou, Z.H.; Chen, X.L.; Ai, G.X.; Xiong, P.W.; Song, W.J.; Liu, G.H.; Zheng, A.J.; Chen, J. Effect of Moringa oleifera leaf powder supplementation on growth performance, digestive enzyme activity, meat quality, and cecum microbiota of Ningdu yellow chickens. Agriculture 2024, 14, 1523.
- Chen, J.; Song, Q.L.; Wu, D.; Zou, Z.H.; Gong, J.P.; Chen, X.L.; Song, W.J.; Xiong, P.W.; Xu, C.H.; Li, M.C.; et al. Effects of Honeysuckle stem and leaf powder on growth performance, immune function, antioxidant capacity and intestinal health of Ningdu Yellow Chickens. Chin. J. Anim. Nutri. 2024, 36, 3631-3641.
- Song, Q.L.; Chen, J.; Wu, D.; Zou, Z.H.; Gong, J.P.; Chen, X.L.; Song, W.J.; Xiong, P.W.; Xu, C.H.; Li, M.C.; et al. Effects of Tetrastigma hemsleyanum leaves powder on growth performance, serum biochemical index and jejunum morphology of Chongren patridge chickens. Chinese Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine 2024, 51, 2481-2488.
- Shi, K.Z.; Zhang, X.; Du, L.C.; Huang, B.; Tan, Y.; Jiang, X.Q.; Zhou, S.X. Investigate the effects of Qian Fagopyrum cymosum (Trev.) Meisn No.1 in Guizhou native porcine culture. Feed Research 2020, 43, 32-34.
- Chen, C.; Li, A. Transcriptome Analysis of Differentially Expressed Genes Involved in Proanthocyanidin Accumulation in the Rhizomes of Fagopyrum dibotrys and an Irradiation-Induced Mutant. Front. Physiol. 2016, 7, 100. [CrossRef]
- Hou, Z.P.; Zheng, X.; Chen, Q.; Wu, D.Q. Nutritional value, bioactivity of extract and application in animal production of Fagopyrum dibotrys. Chin. J. Anim. Nutri. 2021, 33, 3019-3027.
- Jing, R.; Li, H.-Q.; Hu, C.-L.; Jiang, Y.-P.; Qin, L.-P.; Zheng, C.-J. Phytochemical and Pharmacological Profiles of Three Fagopyrum Buckwheats. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 589. [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Liu, J.; Chang, Q.; Zhou, Z.; Han, R.; Liang, Z. Antioxidant and Antidiabetic Activity of Proanthocyanidins from Fagopyrum dibotrys. Molecules 2021, 26, 2417. [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L.-L.; He, Y.; Sheng, F.; Hu, Y.-F.; Song, Y.; Li, W.; Chen, J.; Zhang, J.; Zou, L. Towards a better understanding of Fagopyrum dibotrys: a systematic review. Chin. Med. 2021, 16, 1–18. [CrossRef]
- Zhang, M.; Zhang, X.; Pei, J.; Guo, B.; Zhang, G.; Li, M.; Huang, L. Identification of phytochemical compounds of Fagopyrum dibotrys and their targets by metabolomics, network pharmacology and molecular docking studies. Heliyon 2023, 9, e14029. [CrossRef]
- Chen, Z.; Dai, G.; Wu, X.; Li, L.; Tian, Y.; Tan, L. Protective effects of Fagopyrum dibotrys on oxidized oil-induced oxidative stress, intestinal barrier impairment, and altered cecal microbiota in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2023, 102, 102472. [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Zhao, B.; Ruan, Y.; Xu, W.; Luo, Z.; Xu, J.; Shi, C.; Shan, J. Fagopyrum Dibotrys Rhizoma regulates pulmonary lipid metabolic homeostasis and the ERK-cPLA2 pathway to alleviate asthma in mice. Phytomedicine 2024, 131, 155782. [CrossRef]
- Yang, T.; Chen, X.L.; Hu, L.Z.; Zou, Z.H.; Wei, Q.P.; Wen, H. Advances in studies on the pharmacological effects of Fagopyrum dibotrys and its application in animal production. Pratacultural Science 2023, 40, 2411-2423.
- Xiong, P.W.; Chen, X.L.; Hu, L.Z.; Song, Q.L.; Wei, Q.P.; Liu, L.X.; Song, W.J.; Zhou, Z.H. Effects of golden buckwheat stem and leaf meal on reproductive performance, serum immune indices, antioxidant capacity and intestinal flora of Gannan Tibetan Pigs. Chinese Journal of Animal Science 2023, 59, 269-276.
- Zhang, R.; Chen, G.J.; Shang, Y.S.; Li, S.G.; Li, X.D.; Xiong, X.Q.; Mu, Q.; Wang, X.L.; Ran, W.N.; Ban, S.Z. Effect of freshly feeding Fagopyrum dibotrys on performance, egg quality and serum index of heat stressed laying hens. Acta Prataculturae Sinica 2020, 29, 179-189.
- Zhang, R.; Cheng, G.J.; Nie, C.S.; Wu, J.G.; Pan, F.Q.; Liu, F.D.; Shang, Y.S.; Li, S.G.; Chen, Y.L.; Long, Z.F.; et al. Effects of ambient temperature and Fagopyrum dibotrys extract supplemental level on performance, egg quality, and serum biochemical and immune indices of laying Hens. Chin. J. Anim. Nutri. 2023, 35, 5708-5723.
- Zhang, L.Y. Feed Analysis and Feed Quality Testing Technology, 3rd ed.; China Agricultural University Press: Beijing, China, 2007.
- AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 18 th ed.; The Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Arlington, VA, USA, 2006.
- Zhang, B.; Wang, Z.; Huang, C.; Wang, D.; Chang, D.; Shi, X.; Chen, Y.; Chen, H. Positive effects of Mulberry leaf extract on egg quality, lipid metabolism, serum biochemistry, and antioxidant indices of laying hens. Front. Veter- Sci. 2022, 9, 1005643. [CrossRef]
- Cullere, M.; Tasoniero, G.; Giaccone, V.; Acuti, G.; Marangon, A.; Dalle Zotte, A. Black soldier fly as dietary protein source for broiler quails: meat proximate composition, fatty acid and amino acid profile, oxidative status and sensory traits. Animal 2018, 12, 640–647. [CrossRef]
- Xu, C.; Xiong, P.; Song, W.; Song, Q.; Hu, Y.; Song, T.; Ji, H.; Chen, X.; Zou, Z. Effects of Fermented Navel Orange Pulp on Growth Performance, Carcass Characteristics, Meat Quality, Meat Nutritional Value, and Serum Biochemical Indicators of Finishing Tibetan Pigs. Foods 2024, 13, 1910. [CrossRef]
- Zhao, J.L.; Jiang, L.; Tang, X.H.; Peng, L.X.; Li, X.; Zhao, G.; Zhong, L.Y. Chemical Composition, Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Activities of the Flower Volatile Oils of Fagopyrum esculentum, Fagopyrum tataricum and Fagopyrum Cymosum. Molecules 2018, 23.
- Ting, S.; Yeh, H.S.; Lien, T.F. Effects of supplemental levels of hesperetin and naringenin on egg quality, serum traits and antioxidant activity of laying hens. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2011, 163, 59–66. [CrossRef]
- Surai, P.F. Polyphenol compounds in the chicken/animal diet: from the past to the future. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2013, 98, 19–31. [CrossRef]
- Feng, Y.; Dai, G.; Han, X.; Li, M.; Zhao, D.; Wu, J.; Wu, Y.; Wen, Z. Feeding Laying Ducks Eucommia ulmoides oliv. Leaves Increases the n-3 Fatty Acids Content and Decreases the n-6: n-3 PUFA Ratio in Egg Yolk without Affecting Laying Performance or Egg Quality. Foods 2023, 12, 287. [CrossRef]
- Iskender, H.; Yenice, G.; Dokumacioglu, E.; Kaynar, O.; Hayirli, A.; Kaya, A. Comparison of the effects of dietary supplementation of flavonoids on laying hen performance, egg quality and egg nutrient profile. Br. Poult. Sci. 2017, 58, 550–556. [CrossRef]
- Ji, F.; Gu, L.; Rong, G.; Hu, C.; Sun, W.; Wang, D.; Peng, W.; Lin, D.; Liu, Q.; Wu, H.; et al. Using Extract From the Stems and Leaves of Yizhi (Alpiniae oxyphyllae) as Feed Additive Increases Meat Quality and Intestinal Health in Ducks. Front. Veter- Sci. 2022, 8, 793698. [CrossRef]
- Tian, X.-Z.; Li, J.-X.; Luo, Q.-Y.; Wang, X.; Xiao, M.-M.; Zhou, D.; Lu, Q.; Chen, X. Effect of Supplementation With Selenium-Yeast on Muscle Antioxidant Activity, Meat Quality, Fatty Acids and Amino Acids in Goats. Front. Veter- Sci. 2022, 8, 813672. [CrossRef]
- Yao, B.-N.; Liao, F.-Y.; Yang, J.-Y.; Liu, A.; Wang, J.; Zhu, B.-G.; Feng, G.; Yang, S.-L. Effect of sea buckthorn extract on production performance, serum biochemical indexes, egg quality, and cholesterol deposition of laying ducks. Front. Veter- Sci. 2023, 10, 1127117. [CrossRef]
- Lenighan, Y.M.; McNulty, B.A.; Roche, H.M. Dietary fat composition: replacement of saturated fatty acids with PUFA as a public health strategy, with an emphasis on α-linolenic acid. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2019, 78, 234–245. [CrossRef]
- Efenberger-Szmechtyk, M.; Nowak, A.; Czyzowska, A. Plant extracts rich in polyphenols: antibacterial agents and natural preservatives for meat and meat products. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 61, 149–178. [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.L.; Xue, Y.Y.; Sun, H.B.; Nan, S.S.; Zhang, W.J.; Nie, C.X. Effects of Mulberry leaf extract on growth performance, slaughter performance, organ indexes, serum biochemical indexes and nutrient apparent digestibility of yellow feather broilers. Chin. J. Anim. Nutri. 2023, 35, 5049-5058.
- Chen, K.L.; Gui, G.H.; Shen, L.L.; Ren, M.M.; Xu, E. Effects of adding buckwheat stem and leaf powder on meat quality and blood biochemical indexes in growing pigs. Guizhou Journal of Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine 2020, 44, 5-8.
- Tan, L.L.; Zhang, D.H.; Zhang, J.; Deng, R. Effects of golden buckwheat on antioxidant function,intestinal barrier function and serum biochemical indexes of broilers. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences 2019, 47, 232-235.
- Liu, X.J.; Li, W.; Chen, J.; Ma, X.D.; Chen, C.; Liu, H.Y.; Su, Q.; Zhang, J.S.; Qiao, F.B.; Jia, Z.P. Effects of compound Chinese Herbal Medicine on growth performance, serum immune, protein metabolism, and anti-stress indices of weaned piglets. Chin. J. Anim. Nutri. 2025, 37, 194-203.
| Items | Contents |
| Gross energy (MJ/kg) | 15.48 |
| Dry matter | 86.40 |
| Crude protein | 4.03 |
| Crude fat | 0.30 |
| Crude fiber | 14.10 |
| Crude ash | 4.10 |
| Calcium | 0.41 |
| Total phosphorus | 0.31 |
| Items | F0 | F1 | F2 | F3 |
| Ingredient | ||||
| Maize | 52.00 | 51.60 | 51.40 | 51.00 |
| Soybean meal | 23.90 | 23.81 | 23.75 | 23.65 |
| wheat bran | 9.35 | 9.85 | 10.10 | 10.60 |
| Soybean oil | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Limestone | 8.47 | 8.46 | 8.47 | 8.50 |
| Calcium hydrogen phosphate dihydrate | 1.39 | 1.39 | 1.39 | 1.36 |
| Sodium chloride | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.30 |
| Choline chloride | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 |
| Vitamin premix1) | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| Mineral premix2) | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 |
| DL-methionine | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.16 |
| L-lysine·HCl | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| L-tryptophan | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Rice bran and hull | 3.00 | 2.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 |
| Fagopyrum dibotrys rhizoma meal | 0.00 | 1.00 | 2.00 | 3.00 |
| Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Nutrient levels3) | ||||
| Metabolizable energy (MJ/kg) | 10.47 | 10.47 | 10.48 | 10.47 |
| Crude protein (%) | 16.50 | 16.50 | 16.50 | 16.50 |
| Ca (%) | 3.60 | 3.60 | 3.60 | 3.60 |
| NPP (%) | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.35 |
| Digestible lysine (%) | 0.854 | 0.853 | 0.853 | 0.852 |
| Digestible methionine (%) | 0.399 | 0.408 | 0.408 | 0.408 |
| Digestible threonine (%) | 0.210 | 0.200 | 0.200 | 0.201 |
| Digestible tryptophan (%) | 0.605 | 0.605 | 0.605 | 0.604 |
| Items4 | Groups | SEM2 | P-value3 | |||
| F0 | F1 | F2 | F3 | |||
| DEW (g/d) | 788.20 | 799.09 | 792.87 | 795.93 | 11.74 | 0.990 |
| AEW (g) | 64.94 | 65.09 | 64.93 | 64.34 | 0.22 | 0.650 |
| DEN [egg/(duck·d)] | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.01 | 0.977 |
| LR (%) | 75.85 | 76.79 | 76.36 | 77.36 | 1.14 | 0.977 |
| ADFI [g/(duck·d)] | 183.22 | 177.23 | 180.3 | 178.55 | 0.93 | 0.116 |
| F/E (g/g) | 3.74 | 3.57 | 3.67 | 3.61 | 0.05 | 0.706 |
| Items4 | Groups | SEM2 | P-value3 | |||
| F0 | F1 | F2 | F3 | |||
| Shape index (SI) | 1.36 | 1.35 | 1.35 | 1.35 | 0.003 | 0.782 |
| Shell strength (N/m2) | 39.69b | 43.12ab | 43.88a | 44.80a | 0.61 | 0.006 |
| Shell thickness (mm) | 0.37 | 0.37 | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.002 | 0.124 |
| Albumen height (mm) | 7.00 | 7.08 | 6.83 | 6.75 | 0.09 | 0.544 |
| Haugh unit | 80.74 | 81.59 | 80.20 | 79.32 | 0.64 | 0.674 |
| Yolk color | 5.52b | 5.76a | 5.77a | 5.73a | 0.03 | 0.003 |
| Vitellus proportion (%) | 31.55 | 31.54 | 31.74 | 31.60 | 0.13 | 0.953 |
| Albumen proportion (%) | 60.02 | 59.55 | 59.60 | 59.27 | 0.15 | 0.385 |
| Shell proportion (%) | 8.48b | 8.91ab | 8.83ab | 9.13a | 0.07 | 0.003 |
| Items | Groups | SEM2 | P-value3 | |||
| F0 | F1 | F2 | F3 | |||
| Moisture (%) | 49.57 | 49.75 | 49.25 | 49.61 | 0.10 | 0.410 |
| Crude protein (%) | 17.70 | 18.00 | 17.88 | 17.96 | 0.07 | 0.420 |
| Ether extract (%) | 10.61 | 10.53 | 10.52 | 10.38 | 0.06 | 0.646 |
| Cholesterol (mg/g) | 9.06 | 8.26 | 7.96 | 8.66 | 0.19 | 0.211 |
| Ca (mg/g) | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.01 | 0.073 |
| Items4 | Groups | SEM2 | P-value3 | |||
| F0 | F1 | F2 | F3 | |||
| EAAs | ||||||
| Thr | 6.25b | 6.38ab | 6.77a | 6.82a | 0.07 | 0.003 |
| Val | 8.09ab | 8.01b | 8.46a | 8.11ab | 0.09 | 0.002 |
| Met | 4.00 | 4.31 | 4.52 | 4.42 | 0.08 | 0.104 |
| Ile | 6.14ab | 6.04b | 6.56a | 6.20ab | 0.08 | 0.024 |
| Leu | 12.26b | 12.89b | 13.67a | 12.95ab | 0.19 | 0.004 |
| Phe | 6.56 | 6.46 | 7.04 | 6.67 | 0.10 | 0.195 |
| Lys | 10.10 | 10.52 | 11.00 | 10.84 | 0.13 | 0.073 |
| NEAAs | ||||||
| Asp | 12.24b | 12.42ab | 13.29a | 13.26a | 0.15 | 0.009 |
| Ser | 11.29 | 11.03 | 12.08 | 11.35 | 0.14 | 0.066 |
| Glu | 17.44b | 17.77ab | 18.84a | 18.28ab | 0.18 | 0.026 |
| Gly | 4.29b | 4.35b | 4.69a | 4.47ab | 0.05 | 0.010 |
| Ala | 7.14 | 7.27 | 7.42 | 7.44 | 0.06 | 0.307 |
| Cys | 2.18b | 2.20b | 2.28a | 2.26ab | 0.02 | 0.003 |
| Tyr | 5.15 | 5.36 | 5.64 | 5.50 | 0.08 | 0.227 |
| His | 3.18 | 3.30 | 3.42 | 3.44 | 0.04 | 0.092 |
| Arg | 8.68 | 9.07 | 9.85 | 9.48 | 0.17 | 0.227 |
| Pro | 4.96 | 4.80 | 5.29 | 4.84 | 0.07 | 0.095 |
| Total EAAs | 53.73b | 54.99b | 58.75a | 54.80ab | 0.66 | <0.001 |
| Total NEAAs | 74.39 | 77.08 | 79.13 | 79.80 | 0.97 | 0.198 |
| Total AAs | 128.12b | 131.61ab | 140.00a | 134.60ab | 1.34 | 0.008 |
| Flavour AAs | 52.46 | 53.62 | 55.49 | 55.61 | 0.57 | 0.158 |
| Umami AAs | 29.67b | 30.19ab | 31.93a | 31.54ab | 0.31 | 0.021 |
| Sweet AAs | 27.98 | 27.45 | 28.01 | 28.10 | 0.38 | 0.939 |
| Aromatic AAs | 11.37 | 11.82 | 12.63 | 12.17 | 0.17 | 0.054 |
| Items4 | Groups | SEM2 | P-value3 | |||
| F0 | F1 | F2 | F3 | |||
| C14:0 | 0.40a | 0.39ab | 0.36b | 0.34b | 0.01 | <0.001 |
| C16:0 | 21.82a | 21.19b | 21.15b | 21.44ab | 0.08 | 0.034 |
| C17:0 | 1.21 | 1.18 | 1.15 | 1.17 | 0.01 | 0.081 |
| C18:0 | 6.64 | 6.62 | 6.67 | 6.64 | 0.02 | 0.884 |
| C20:0 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.001 | 0.111 |
| C16:1 | 4.65 | 4.73 | 4.75 | 4.72 | 0.02 | 0.116 |
| C17:1 | 1.32 | 1.37 | 1.29 | 1.30 | 0.01 | 0.323 |
| C18:1n9 | 45.70 | 45.88 | 46.01 | 46.34 | 0.10 | 0.106 |
| C20:1 | 0.32b | 0.33ab | 0.33ab | 0.34a | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| C18:2n6 | 15.20ab | 15.42a | 15.33ab | 14.81b | 0.09 | 0.033 |
| C18:3n3 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.001 | 0.907 |
| C18:3n6 | 0.90 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.92 | 0.003 | 0.082 |
| C20:3 | 0.085b | 0.089ab | 0.087ab | 0.092a | 0.001 | 0.025 |
| C20:4 | 0.93 | 0.95 | 0.93 | 0.94 | 0.004 | 0.197 |
| C22:6 | 0.75 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.002 | 0.053 |
| Total SFAs | 30.31a | 29.46b | 29.41b | 29.67b | 0.10 | 0.033 |
| Total MUFAs | 51.98 | 52.31 | 52.40 | 52.71 | 0.11 | 0.204 |
| Total PUFAs | 17.96ab | 18.23a | 18.11ab | 17.62b | 0.08 | 0.041 |
| Total UFAs | 69.70 | 70.55 | 70.55 | 70.33 | 0.11 | 0.069 |
| UFAs:SFAs | 2.30b | 2.40a | 2.39a | 2.37ab | 0.01 | 0.040 |
| PUFAs:SFAs | 0.59b | 0.62a | 0.61ab | 0.60ab | 0.005 | 0.032 |
| Items4 | Groups | SEM2 | P-value3 | |||
| F0 | F1 | F2 | F3 | |||
| TP (g/L) | 30.26b | 31.88ab | 35.20a | 32.4ab | 0.49 | 0.002 |
| ALB (g/L) | 15.91 | 15.67 | 17.34 | 15.88 | 0.24 | 0.107 |
| BUN (mmol/L) | 6.25b | 5.63b | 8.47ab | 10.29a | 0.54 | 0.005 |
| AKP (KU/100 mL) | 20.28 | 19.76 | 20.24 | 22.94 | 1.21 | 0.900 |
| Ca (mmol/L) | 1.34ab | 1.29b | 1.46a | 1.29b | 0.02 | 0.030 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 6.32 | 4.29 | 5.06 | 4.67 | 0.33 | 0.169 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 2.43 | 3.85 | 2.37 | 2.58 | 0.21 | 0.210 |
| HDL (mmol/L) | 1.12 | 1.85 | 1.19 | 1.50 | 0.11 | 0.059 |
| LDL (mmol/L) | 0.76 | 0.83 | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.04 | 0.449 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
