Preprint
Essay

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Causal Emergence in Quantum Systems: A First-Principles Simulation of the Double-Slit Experiment

Submitted:

24 December 2025

Posted:

26 December 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
This paper presents a first-principles physical simulation of the double-slit experiment to investigate causal emergence in quantum systems. Unlike traditional approaches that rely on pre-sampled distributions, our simulation generates particle trajectories from fundamental physical laws, incorporating quantum interference potential and decoherence effects. We demonstrate that quantum coherence leads to causal emergence, where macroscopic descriptions contain more information than microscopic ones, as quantified by effective information (EI). The simulation reveals a phase transition at a critical decoherence strength, beyond which causal emergence disappears. Our results provide computational evidence for the theoretical framework of causal emergence in quantum mechanics and highlight the role of observation in altering explanatory power. The methodology avoids data filtering bias by generating trajectories self-consistently from physical principles.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

The double-slit experiment has been central to understanding quantum mechanics since its inception [1]. It demonstrates wave-particle duality and the role of measurement in quantum systems. Recent theoretical work has extended this understanding to the concept of causal emergence, where higher-level descriptions can capture more causal structure than their microscopic counterparts [2].
In this paper, we present a novel simulation approach that generates particle trajectories from first principles, avoiding the common pitfall of pre-sampling endpoint distributions. Our model incorporates quantum interference potential to guide particle paths, allowing us to study how causal emergence emerges from fundamental physical laws. We quantify this emergence using effective information (EI), a measure of causal structure in dynamical systems [2].

2. Methodology

Our simulation is based on the following key features:
  • First-principles trajectory generation without endpoint pre-sampling
  • Quantum paths guided by wavefunction evolution and interference potential
  • Classical paths modeled through single-slit diffusion
  • Consistent EI calculation without data filtering bias
  • Physical interpretation of causal emergence
The core of our simulation is the generation of trajectories that emerge naturally from physical laws rather than being sampled from predetermined distributions. This approach ensures that our results reflect genuine physical phenomena rather than artifacts of statistical sampling.

3. Simulation Implementation

The simulation was implemented in Python with a completely self-consistent approach where trajectories emerge from physical laws, not from pre-sampled distributions. The complete code is provided in Appendix A and consists of the following key components:
1.
Global parameters: Defines the experimental setup including grid dimensions, slit positions, and physical constants.
2.
Physical wavefunction evolution: Implements the quantum interference potential that guides particle paths.
3.
Trajectory generation: Generates quantum and classical particle trajectories from first principles.
4.
Effective information calculation: Computes EI from trajectories without filtering bias.
5.
Analysis functions: Analyzes distributions and trajectory characteristics.
6.
Visualization: Generates comprehensive plots of results.
The key innovation is the use of an interference potential derived from the wavefunction evolution to guide quantum particle paths, simulating the effect of quantum coherence naturally rather than imposing interference patterns through pre-sampling.

4. Results

The simulation produced comprehensive results demonstrating causal emergence in quantum systems. Figure 1 summarizes the key findings.

4.1. Trajectory Analysis

Figure 2 shows example trajectories for quantum and classical particles. Quantum particles exhibit more complex, wavy paths due to interference effects, while classical particles follow simpler diffusion patterns.

4.2. Effective Information Analysis

Figure 3 shows the effective information (EI) as a function of decoherence strength for different binning levels. We observe that EI increases with decoherence strength, indicating that classical systems (high decoherence) have stronger causal structure at the microscopic level.

4.3. Causal Emergence Analysis

The key finding is shown in Figure 4, which displays the difference between coarse-grained and fine-grained EI ( Δ EI), quantifying causal emergence. Positive Δ EI indicates that the coarse-grained (macroscopic) description contains more causal information than the fine-grained (microscopic) description.

5. Discussion

Our simulation provides compelling evidence for causal emergence in quantum systems. The key finding is that quantum coherence leads to a situation where macroscopic descriptions contain more information about the system’s causal structure than microscopic descriptions. This is quantified by the positive Δ EI values observed in the quantum regime ( γ = 0.0 ).
The phase transition at a critical decoherence strength ( γ c r i t 0.4 ) marks the boundary between quantum and classical behavior. Below this threshold, quantum interference effects dominate, leading to causal emergence. Above this threshold, decoherence destroys the quantum coherence, eliminating causal emergence [3].
These results have important implications for our understanding of quantum mechanics and complexity theory. They suggest that the apparent "weirdness" of quantum systems may be related to their ability to exhibit causal emergence, where higher-level descriptions are more informative than lower-level ones. This challenges the reductionist view that microscopic descriptions are always more fundamental.

6. Conclusion

In this paper, we presented a first-principles simulation of the double-slit experiment that demonstrates causal emergence in quantum systems. Our approach avoids the common pitfall of pre-sampling endpoint distributions by generating trajectories from fundamental physical laws. We quantified causal emergence using effective information and showed that quantum coherence leads to situations where macroscopic descriptions contain more causal information than microscopic ones.
The simulation revealed a phase transition at a critical decoherence strength ( γ c r i t 0.4 ), beyond which causal emergence disappears. These results provide computational evidence for the theoretical framework of causal emergence in quantum mechanics [2] and highlight the role of observation in altering explanatory power.
Future work could extend this approach to more complex quantum systems and explore the relationship between causal emergence and other quantum phenomena such as entanglement and non-locality. The complete simulation code, including 12-panel visualization and data export functions, is provided in Appendix A for reproducibility and further research.

Appendix A. Complete Simulation Code with 12-Panel Visualization

The complete Python simulation code is provided below, containing all functions necessary to reproduce the results presented in this paper. The code implements:
  • First-principles trajectory generation without endpoint pre-sampling
  • Quantum interference potential calculation and wavefunction evolution
  • Decoherence effects modeling and classical diffusion paths
  • Effective information computation for both coarse-grained and fine-grained descriptions
  • Comprehensive analysis of trajectory characteristics and interference patterns
  • Generation of 12-panel visualization summarizing all key results
  • Data export to CSV files for further analysis
The complete code is structured into logical sections and includes detailed comments for clarity. All parameters used in the simulation are explicitly defined and can be modified to explore different experimental configurations.

Appendix B. Supplementary Results and Implementation Details

The simulation generates three output files:
  • evp_first_principles_results.png: 12-panel visualization figure (Figure 1 in the main text)
  • evp_first_principles_results.csv: Complete simulation results including EI values for all decoherence levels and binning granularities
  • evp_particle_samples.csv: Sample particle trajectories for key decoherence levels ( γ = 0.0 , 0.5 , 1.0 )
The simulation requires Python 3.7+ with the following packages: NumPy ≥ 1.20.0, Matplotlib ≥ 3.4.0, Pandas ≥ 1.3.0, SciPy ≥ 1.7.0, and tqdm ≥ 4.62.0. The complete implementation demonstrates how causal emergence naturally arises from quantum interference effects and disappears as decoherence destroys quantum coherence.

Appendix C. Complete Simulation Code

Appendix C.1. Full Simulation Code with 12-Panel Visualization

Preprints 191270 i001
Preprints 191270 i002
Preprints 191270 i003
Preprints 191270 i004
Preprints 191270 i005
Preprints 191270 i006
Preprints 191270 i007
Preprints 191270 i008
Preprints 191270 i009
Preprints 191270 i010
Preprints 191270 i011
Preprints 191270 i012
Preprints 191270 i013
Preprints 191270 i014
Preprints 191270 i015
Preprints 191270 i016

Appendix C.2. Code Structure Summary

The complete simulation code consists of the following components:
1.
Global parameters: Defines the experimental setup, physical constants, and simulation parameters.
2.
Wavefunction evolution: Implements quantum interference potential and diffraction envelope calculations.
3.
Trajectory generation: Generates particle trajectories from first principles, with decoherence effects.
4.
Effective information calculation: Computes EI from trajectories without filtering bias.
5.
Analysis functions: Analyzes distributions, trajectory characteristics, and interference visibility.
6.
Comprehensive visualization: Generates 12-panel figure with all key results.
7.
Data output: Saves simulation results to CSV files and images.

Appendix C.3. Dependencies and Requirements

The simulation requires the following Python packages:
  • numpy≥ 1.20.0
  • matplotlib≥ 3.4.0
  • pandas≥ 1.3.0
  • scipy≥ 1.7.0
  • tqdm≥ 4.62.0
To install all dependencies:
pip install numpy matplotlib pandas scipy tqdm

Appendix C.4. Running the Simulation

The simulation can be executed directly:
python evp_double_slit_simulation.py
The simulation will:
1.
Generate 10,000 particle trajectories across 6 decoherence levels
2.
Compute effective information for coarse and fine-grained descriptions
3.
Generate 12-panel visualization of all results
4.
Save results to CSV files for further analysis
5.
Display key statistics and physical interpretation

Appendix C.5. Output Files

The simulation generates the following output files:
  • evp_first_principles_results.png: 12-panel visualization figure
  • evp_first_principles_results.csv: Complete simulation results
  • evp_particle_samples.csv: Sample particle trajectories

Appendix D. Simulation Parameters

Appendix D.1. Physical Parameters

Table A1. Physical parameters used in the simulation
Table A1. Physical parameters used in the simulation
Parameter Value Description
Grid width 101 Simulation grid width in arbitrary units
Slit positions [35, 65] X-coordinates of the two slits
Source Y 0 Y-coordinate of particle source
Slit Y 15 Y-coordinate of slit plane
Screen Y 80 Y-coordinate of detection screen
Wavelength 2.0 Quantum wavelength
Number of particles 10,000 Total particles simulated

Appendix D.2. Decoherence Parameters

The simulation explores 6 decoherence levels:
  • γ = 0.0 : Pure quantum (full coherence)
  • γ = 0.2 : Weak decoherence
  • γ = 0.4 : Moderate decoherence
  • γ = 0.6 : Strong decoherence
  • γ = 0.8 : Very strong decoherence
  • γ = 1.0 : Fully classical (no coherence)

Appendix D.3. Discretization Parameters

Effective information is calculated for 6 different discretization granularities:
  • 15 bins
  • 20 bins
  • 25 bins
  • 30 bins
  • 35 bins
  • 40 bins

References

  1. Feynman, R. P.; Leighton, R. B.; Sands, M. The Feynman Lectures on Physics . In Quantum Mechanics; Addison-Wesley, 1965; Vol. 3. [Google Scholar]
  2. Hoel, E. P.; Albantakis, L.; Tononi, G. Quantifying causal emergence shows that macro can beat micro. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2013, 110(49), 19790–19795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zurek, W. H. Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical. Reviews of Modern Physics 2003, 75(3), 715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bohm, D. A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of "hidden" variables. Physical Review 1952, 85(2), 166–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Born, M. Zur Quantenmechanik der Stoßvorgänge. Zeitschrift für Physik 1926, 37(12), 863–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Quantum Theory and Measurement; Wheeler, J. A., Zurek, W. H., Eds.; Princeton University Press, 1983. [Google Scholar]
  7. Griffiths, D. J. Introduction to Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed.; Pearson Prentice Hall, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  8. Nielsen, M. A.; Chuang, I. L. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, 10th anniversary ed.; Cambridge University Press, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ballentine, L. E. Quantum Mechanics: A Modern Development; World Scientific, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  10. Schlosshauer, M. Decoherence and the Quantum-to-Classical Transition; Springer, 2007. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Comprehensive results of the first-principles simulation of the double-slit experiment. The 12 panels show different aspects of the simulation, including example trajectories, distribution comparisons, effective information calculations, and physical interpretations.
Figure 1. Comprehensive results of the first-principles simulation of the double-slit experiment. The 12 panels show different aspects of the simulation, including example trajectories, distribution comparisons, effective information calculations, and physical interpretations.
Preprints 191270 g001
Figure 2. Example trajectories for quantum (blue) and classical (red) particles. The green lines indicate the positions of the slits, and the black dashed line represents the slit plane.
Figure 2. Example trajectories for quantum (blue) and classical (red) particles. The green lines indicate the positions of the slits, and the black dashed line represents the slit plane.
Preprints 191270 g002
Figure 3. Effective information (EI) as a function of decoherence strength for different binning levels. Higher EI values indicate stronger causal structure.
Figure 3. Effective information (EI) as a function of decoherence strength for different binning levels. Higher EI values indicate stronger causal structure.
Preprints 191270 g003
Figure 4. Difference between coarse-grained and fine-grained effective information ( Δ EI) as a function of decoherence strength. Positive Δ EI indicates causal emergence, which occurs only in the quantum regime ( γ < 0.4 ).
Figure 4. Difference between coarse-grained and fine-grained effective information ( Δ EI) as a function of decoherence strength. Positive Δ EI indicates causal emergence, which occurs only in the quantum regime ( γ < 0.4 ).
Preprints 191270 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated