Dissolving Retrocausality: A Geometric Reinterpretation of Time-Symmetric Quantum Models via the TCGS-SEQUENTION Framework

Contemporary models of quantum retrocausality—from Price & Wharton’s “constrained collider bias” and Cramer’s Transactional Interpretation to Castagnoli’s “causal loops”—share a common presupposition: that temporal order is ontologically fundamental, and that apparent backward-in-time influences require novel causal mechanisms. This paper demonstrates that the Timeless Counterspace (TCGS-SEQUENTION) framework dissolves rather than explains retrocausality. We prove that in any static 4-dimensional counterspace (C, G_AB,Ψ) where time is a foliation gauge (Axiom A3), the “direction” of an apparent causal relation is a foliation artifact with no intrinsic 4D content. Price & Wharton’s “constrained collider” is reinterpreted as a boundary condition in C; Cramer’s “handshake” as worldline connectivity; Castagnoli’s “causal loops” as sequential misreadings of a non-sequential 4D structure. We identify a sharp ontological distinction—the Gauge Dealbreaker—between TCGS (time has no ontic status) and all retrocausal models (time is ontic but admits backward influence). We further distinguish TCGS from standard eternalism, which treats time as a coordinate dimension rather than a pure gauge artifact. The paper provides formal definitions, theorems, and a systematic reinterpretation protocol applicable to any putative retrocausal phenomenon. We conclude that the “mystery” of retrocausality is an artifact of treating foliation parameters as physical facts.