Submitted:
22 October 2025
Posted:
27 October 2025
Read the latest preprint version here
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
1.1. Motivation and Conceptual Background
1.2. The Central Idea
1.3. Unified Origin of Spin and Statistics
1.4. Physical Intuition
Pre–geometric foam
Causal Condensation and Soliton Formation
Quantum Phase and Canonical Structure
Emergent Quantization from Matter Formation
Hierarchy of Dynamical Phases
| Phase | Length scale | Order parameter | Dominant dynamics | Physical character |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-geometric | None (disordered) | Random chronon noise | No metric, no excitations | |
| Planck | Local alignment | Topological soliton formation | Action quantization () | |
| Quantum | Stable phase field | Canonical and gauge oscillations | ; spin–statistics unification | |
| Macroscopic | Domain coherence | Mean-field alignment | Classical limit; decoherence |
1.5. Order Formation and Scale Persistence
1.6. Structure of the Paper

2. Chronon Field Theory: Pre-Geometric Dynamics
2.1. Fundamental Degrees of Freedom
2.2. Emergent Spacetime and Correlation Length
- Pre-geometric phase (): Chronon orientations fluctuate strongly; geometry and topology are undefined. The system exhibits causal noise without propagating excitations [54,63].
- Geometric phase (): Causal orientations align sufficiently to form coherent solitonic structures—stable, localized field configurations corresponding to elementary excitations of spacetime [62,69]. These solitons constitute the first geometric degrees of freedom and provide the seeds for matter fields.
Continuum emergence
3. Hierarchy of Dynamical Phases
3.1. Phase I: Pre-Geometric Regime ()
3.2. Phase II: Planck Regime ()
3.3. Fixation of the Invariant Action Quantum
Formation of the First Soliton
Freezing of the Symplectic Modulus
Inheritance by Gauge and Radiation Modes
Universality Across Regimes
3.4. Phase III: Quantum Regime ()
3.5. Phase IV: Macroscopic Regime ()
3.6. Control Parameter, Order Parameter, and the Role of the Boltzmann Constant
Order Parameter
Physical Interpretation of
Relation to Phase Transitions
Complementarity of and ℏ
| Constant | Domain | Interpretation in Chronon Dynamics |
|---|---|---|
| Statistical | Converts information (entropy) into energy; measures the degree of microscopic disorder. | |
| ℏ | Quantum-geometric | Converts phase into action; defines the invariant curvature modulus of coherent chronon order. |
Summary
4. Mathematical Structure of Quantization
4.1. Canonical Structure on Stabilized Domains
- 1.
- The coarse-grained chronon field admits a Gaussian (quasi-free) limit under ensemble averaging.
- 2.
- The symplectic form Ω is bounded, continuous, and non-degenerate on .
- 3.
- There exists a finite correlation length ξ such that for all , the covariance spectra of are stable up to corrections for some .
Remark on Statistics
4.2. Uncertainty and Minimal Action
4.3. Geometric Interpretation of
Physical Meaning
Consequences
4.4. Effective Inertia and Propagation Speed of the Chronon Field
Continuum Lagrangian
Discrete Realization
| Parameter | Role | Physical interpretation |
| J | Spatial stiffness | Controls local alignment of neighboring chronons, sets correlation length |
| Temporal stiffness (inertia) | Determines cost of causal rotation, sets temporal coherence | |
| Norm-pinning potential | Enforces , ensures soliton stability | |
| Propagation speed | Defines causal cone and emergent metric signature |
5. Numerical Realization
5.1. Lattice Dynamics and Simulation Setup
5.2. Identification of Stabilized Domains and Solitons
5.3. Quantifying the Planck Boundary
5.4. Measurement of Action Variance and Emergence of
5.5. Consistency Tests: Commutator and Uncertainty Structure
- The commutator proxy,evaluated for normalized Gaussian test functions . The measured slope of versus approaches for , confirming that canonical commutation emerges statistically from the underlying chronon dynamics.
- The uncertainty product,which remains above the theoretical lower bound across all scales. Although the bound lies several orders of magnitude below the numerical noise floor, its preservation indicates that fluctuations respect the minimal symplectic constraint, providing a discrete analogue of the Heisenberg uncertainty relation [36,96].
5.6. Emergence of Quantized Action and the Geometric Planck Constant
Stage 1: Boundary-Aligned Coherence and Pinning
Stage 2: Accumulated Action and Effective Planck Modulus
Stage 3: Quantized Additivity of Geometric Action
Summary
5.7. Scaling Consistency and Falsifiable Prediction
Theoretical Prediction
Numerical Verification
Falsifiability
5.8. Analytic Estimate and Emergent Formula for Planck’s Constant
Characteristic Soliton Scale
Effective Propagation Speed
Action per Soliton Cycle
Consistency with Lattice Normalization
Physical Interpretation
5.9. Summary
6. Physical Interpretation
6.1. as the Invariant Link Between Planck and Quantum Phases
6.2. Solitons as the Geometric Origin and Carriers of Quantized Action
6.3. Quantum Mechanics as the Collective Limit of Soliton Ensembles
Summary
6.4. Classical Limit and Decoherence
6.5. Summary and Conceptual Synthesis
- The chronon field defines a discrete, pre-geometric substrate without intrinsic spacetime or metric.
- At the Planck correlation length , stable solitons form, each carrying one quantum of action ℏ.
- Ensembles of such solitons generate quantum mechanics as a collective, coarse-grained theory.
- Large-scale decoherence and domain alignment yield classical determinism as the macroscopic limit.
7. Unified Origin of ℏ, Spin Quantization, and Fermi Statistics
7.1. Universal Curvature and the Chronon Symplectic Form
7.2. Emergent Spin from Internal Symplectic Curvature
7.3. Photon Spin as an Integer Curvature Quantum
Goldstone Excitation and Symplectic Flux
Spin and Representation Structure
Unified Curvature Origin of Quantization
7.4. Two Distinct Antisymmetries
- Canonical antisymmetry — encoded in the symplectic form (64) and represented algebraically byexpressing the antisymmetry of conjugate variables under phase-space exchange. This property is purely geometric and applies universally to all dynamical fields.
- Exchange antisymmetry — a global topological property of the N-soliton configuration space , where denotes the coincidence set. The fundamental group determines the phase acquired upon soliton exchange. In three spatial dimensions,which admits two one-dimensional unitary representations: the trivial (bosonic) and the sign (fermionic) representation. In the latter case, the many-soliton wavefunction obeysproducing Pauli exclusion and Fermi statistics [33,55].
7.5. Synthesis: One Curvature, Three Manifestations
In Chronon Field Theory, ℏ is not an imposed constant but the curvature modulus of the temporal symplectic manifold, manifesting identically in the quantization of action, spin, and statistics.

8. Discussion and Future Directions
8.1. Matter as the Source of Quantization
Photon as an Inherited Quantum
Unified Symplectic Order
8.2. Reinterpreting the Quantum Vacuum and the Resolution of Vacuum Energy Divergence
8.3. Hawking Radiation as Geometric Decoherence

8.4. Finite Core Structure of Black Holes in Chronon Field Theory
8.5. Curvature Instantons and Quantum Tunneling in Chronon Field Theory
8.6. Reinterpretation of Blackbody Radiation and the Rayleigh–Jeans Limit
8.7. Extension to Curved and Dynamical Geometries
8.8. Connection to Holography and Emergent Spacetime
8.9. Universality of ℏ and Relation to Entropy
8.10. Toward Unification of Matter and Geometry
8.11. Summary and Long-Term Vision
- ℏ is a curvature invariant of the Planck transition, not a postulate.
- Quantum mechanics is the hydrodynamic limit of coherent chronon excitations.
- Gravity and spacetime curvature arise from variations in chronon connectivity.
- Fermi–Bose statistics reflect topological coverings of the same symplectic manifold.
- Classical determinism corresponds to complete phase alignment (macroscopic decoherence).
Appendix A. Existence and Stability of Solitonic Excitations
Appendix A.1. Energy Functional and Field Equations
Appendix A.2. Derrick Scaling Argument and Stability
Appendix A.3. Topological and Energetic Interpretation
- Soft unit-norm pinning: It penalizes radial excursions from , establishing a well-defined orientation and internal phase for each chronon domain.
- Nonlinear stabilization: It breaks scale invariance and produces a finite equilibrium radius , enabling soliton stability against collapse.
Appendix A.4. Minimal Action and Identification with ℏ

Appendix B. Rigorous Statement and Proof of the Symplectic Gap
Setup and Notation
Stability Hypothesis
- (S1)
- Quasi-free state:C is positive, self-adjoint, trace-class on H.
- (S2)
- Non-degenerate symplectic form:J is bounded, invertible, and skew-adjoint on H.
- (S3)
- Coercivity on stabilized subspace: There exists a closed subspace and a constant such that
- (S4)
- Coarse-graining stability: Under admissible block scales , the stabilized subspace and constants can be chosen uniformly so that is independent of up to corrections for some .
Main Theorem and Proof
Appendix C. Variational Analysis of the Minimal Soliton Action
Appendix C.1. Analytic Derivation: Bogomolny Bound in 1+1D
Appendix C.2. Numerical Verification of S min =8μ

Appendix C.3. Embedding into the 3+1D Chronon Lattice
Appendix C.4. Interpretation
References
- H. Araki and E. J. Woods, “Representations of the Canonical Commutation Relations Describing a Nonrelativistic Infinite Free Bose Gas,” J. Math. Phys., vol. 4, pp. 637–662, 1970.
- A. Ashtekar, “New variables for classical and quantum gravity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 2244 (1986).
- C. Barceló, S. Liberati, and M. Visser, “Analog gravity from Bose–Einstein condensates,” Class. Quantum Grav. 18, 1137 (2001).
- J. D. Bekenstein, “Black Holes and Entropy,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 7, pp. 2333–2346, 1973.
- M. V. Berry, “Quantal phase factors accompanying adiabatic changes,” Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 392, 45 (1984).
- K. Binder and D. P. Landau, “Phase diagrams and critical behavior in Monte Carlo simulations,” Phys. Rev. B 30, 1477 (1984); see also A Guide to Monte Carlo Simulations in Statistical Physics, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2000).
- E. B. Bogomolny, “Stability of Classical Solutions,” Sov. J. Nucl. Phys., vol. 24, pp. 449–454, 1976.
- N. Bohr, “On the Constitution of Atoms and Molecules,” Philos. Mag. 26, 1 (1913).
- L. Bombelli, J. Lee, D. Meyer, and R. Sorkin, “Space-time as a causal set,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 521 (1987).
- L. Bombelli, J. Lee, D. Meyer, and R. Sorkin, “Space-Time as a Causal Set,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 59, pp. 521–524, 1987.
- O. Bratteli and D. W. Robinson, Operator Algebras and Quantum Statistical Mechanics, Vol. 1–2, Springer, 1987.
- R. Brout, S. Massar, R. Parentani, and P. Spindel, “Hawking Radiation without Trans-Planckian Frequencies,” Phys. Rev. D 52, 4559–4568 (1995). [CrossRef]
- F. Calogero, “Quantum mechanics as a statistical theory,” Phys. Lett. A 228, 335 (1997).
- D. K. Campbell, J. F. Schonfeld, and C. A. Wingate, “Resonance Structure in Kink–Antikink Interactions in ϕ4 Theory,” Physica D, vol. 9, pp. 1–32, 1983.
- E. A. Carlen, “Functional Inequalities, Gaussian States, and Quantum Entropy,” Entropy, vol. 23, no. 10, 1326, 2021.
- I. Carusotto and C. Ciuti, “Quantum Fluids of Light,” Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 85, pp. 299–366, 2013.
- A. Caticha, “Entropic dynamics, time, and quantum theory,” J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 44, 225303 (2011).
- S. Coleman, “Q-Balls,” Nucl. Phys. B, vol. 262, pp. 263–283, 1985.
- M. Creutz, Quarks, Gluons and Lattices (Cambridge University Press, 1983).
- M. Creutz, “Overrelaxation and Monte Carlo simulation,” Phys. Rev. D 36, 515 (1987).
- R. F. Dashen, B. Hasslacher, and A. Neveu, “Nonperturbative Methods and Extended-Hadron Models in Field Theory. II. Two-Dimensional Models and Extended Hadrons,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 10, pp. 4130–4138, 1974.
- G. H. Derrick, “Comments on nonlinear wave equations as models for elementary particles,” J. Math. Phys. 5, 1252 (1964).
- G. H. Derrick, “Comments on Nonlinear Wave Equations as Models for Elementary Particles,” J. Math. Phys., vol. 5, pp. 1252–1254, 1964.
- P. A. M. Dirac, The Principles of Quantum Mechanics (Oxford University Press, 1930).
- P. A. M. Dirac, The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 1st ed., Oxford University Press, 1930.
- P. A. M. Dirac, “The Lagrangian in Quantum Mechanics,” Physikalische Zeitschrift der Sowjetunion 3, 64 (1933).
- P. A. M. Dirac, The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 4th ed. (Oxford University Press, 1958).
- R. J. Donnelly, Quantized Vortices in Helium II (Cambridge University Press, 1991).
- F. Dowker, “Causal Sets and the Deep Structure of Spacetime,” Gen. Rel. Grav., vol. 45, pp. 1651–1667, 2005.
- H.-T. Elze, “Quantum features emerging in a classical spacetime structure,” Phys. Rev. A 89, 012111 (2014).
- L. Faddeev and A. J. Niemi, “Stable Knot-like Structures in Classical Field Theory,” Nature, vol. 387, pp. 58–61, 1997.
- R. P. Feynman, “Space-Time Approach to Non-Relativistic Quantum Mechanics,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 20, 367 (1948).
- D. Finkelstein and J. Rubinstein, “Connection between Spin, Statistics, and Kinks,” J. Math. Phys. 9, 1762 (1968).
- D. Finkelstein, “Space-Time Code,” Phys. Rev., vol. 184, pp. 1261–1271, 1969.
- G. B. Folland, Harmonic Analysis in Phase Space (Princeton University Press, 1989).
- J. Fröhlich, “Quantum theory of large systems of particles,” Lect. Notes Phys. 67, 111 (1979).
- C. Gérard and A. Martinez, “Semiclassical Asymptotics and Time Decay of Resonances,” Commun. Math. Phys., vol. 104, pp. 149–170, 1986.
- H. Haken, Synergetics: An Introduction. Nonequilibrium Phase Transitions and Self-Organization in Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Springer, 3rd ed., 1983.
- M. J. W. Hall and M. Reginatto, “Quantum mechanics from a Heisenberg-type inequality,” J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 35, 3289 (2002).
- S. W. Hawking and G. F. R. Ellis, The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time, Cambridge University Press (1973).
- S. W. Hawking, “Particle Creation by Black Holes,” Commun. Math. Phys. 43, 199–220 (1975); Erratum: Commun. Math. Phys. 46, 206 (1976). [CrossRef]
- D. Hestenes, “The zitterbewegung interpretation of quantum mechanics,” Found. Phys. 40, 1 (2010).
- S. Hollands and R. M. Wald, “Quantum Field Theory is Ultimately Local and Covariant: Renormalization in Curved Spacetime,” Commun. Math. Phys. 257, 589–620 (2005). [CrossRef]
- A. S. Holevo, Probabilistic and Statistical Aspects of Quantum Theory, 2nd ed., Edizioni della Normale, Pisa, 2011.
- S. Hossenfelder, “Experimental Search for Quantum Gravity,” Class. Quantum Grav. 27, 114001 (2010).
- S. Hossenfelder, “Emergent Spacetime,” Foundations of Physics, vol. 43, pp. 1295–1308, 2013.
- R. Jackiw and C. Rebbi, “Solitons with Fermion Number 1/2,” Phys. Rev. D 13, 3398 (1976).
- T. Jacobson, “Black-Hole Evaporation and Ultrashort Distances,” Phys. Rev. D 44, 1731–1739 (1991). [CrossRef]
- T. Jacobson, “Thermodynamics of Spacetime: The Einstein Equation of State,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 75, pp. 1260–1263, 1995.
- E. T. Jaynes, “Information Theory and Statistical Mechanics,” Physical Review, vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 620–630, 1957.
- E. Joos et al., Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World in Quantum Theory (Springer, 2003).
- L. P. Kadanoff, “More is the same; phase transitions and mean field theories,” J. Stat. Phys. 137, 777 (2009).
- J. B. Kogut and L. Susskind, “Hamiltonian formulation of Wilson’s lattice gauge theories,” Phys. Rev. D 11, 395 (1975).
- T. Konopka, F. Markopoulou, and L. Smolin, “Quantum Graphity,” Phys. Rev. D 77, 104029 (2008).
- M. G. G. Laidlaw and C. M. DeWitt, “Feynman functional integrals for systems of indistinguishable particles,” Phys. Rev. D 3, 1375 (1971).
- L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Statistical Physics, Part 1, Pergamon Press, 3rd ed., 1980.
- R. Landauer, “Irreversibility and Heat Generation in the Computing Process,” IBM J. Res. Dev., vol. 5, pp. 183–191, 1961.
- R. B. Laughlin, A Different Universe: Reinventing Physics from the Bottom Down (Basic Books, 2005).
- B. Li, “Emergence and Exclusivity of Lorentzian Signature and Unit–Norm Time from Random Chronon Dynamics,” Reports in Advances of Physical Sciences, accepted (2025).
- B. Li, “Radiative and Phase-Symmetric Modes in Chronon Field Theory,” Class. Quantum Grav., 2025.
- B. Li, “Statistical foundation of the chronon field: causal order and emergent Lorentzian structure,” RAPS Phys. Rev., in press (2025). in press.
- B. Li, “Emergent Gravity and Gauge Interactions from Chronon Field Condensation,” RAPS Phys. Rev. (2025, accepted).
- B. Li, “Emergence and Exclusivity of Lorentzian Signature from Chronon Dynamics,” RAPS Phys. Rev. (2025, accepted).
- S. Lloyd, “Ultimate Physical Limits to Computation,” Nature, vol. 406, pp. 1047–1054, 2000.
- R. Loll, “Quantum Gravity from Causal Dynamical Triangulations: A Review,” Class. Quantum Grav., vol. 37, 013002, 2019.
- N. Manton and P. Sutcliffe, Topological Solitons, Cambridge University Press, 2004.
- F. Markopoulou, “Quantum causal histories,” Class. Quantum Grav. 24, 3699 (2009).
- E. Nelson, “Derivation of the Schrödinger equation from Newtonian mechanics,” Phys. Rev. 150, 1079 (1966).
- D. Oriti, “The Universe as a Quantum Gravity Condensate,” Comptes Rendus Physique 18, 235 (2018).
- T. Padmanabhan, “Thermodynamical Aspects of Gravity: New Insights,” Rep. Prog. Phys., vol. 73, 046901, 2010.
- G. Parisi and Y.-S. Wu, “Perturbation theory without gauge fixing,” Sci. Sin. 24, 483 (1981).
- R. Penrose, “Gravitational collapse and space-time singularities,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 14, 57–59 (1965).
- R. Penrose, “Angular Momentum: An Approach to Combinatorial Space-Time,” in Quantum Theory and Beyond, Cambridge University Press, 1971.
- M. Planck, “Ueber das Gesetz der Energieverteilung im Normalspectrum,” Ann. Phys. 4, 553 (1901).
- M. K. Prasad and C. M. Sommerfield, “Exact Classical Solution for the ’t Hooft–Polyakov Monopole and the Julia–Zee Dyon,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 35, pp. 760–762, 1975.
- W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992.
- I. Prigogine and G. Nicolis, Self-Organization in Nonequilibrium Systems: From Dissipative Structures to Order Through Fluctuations, Wiley, 1978.
- R. Rajaraman, Solitons and Instantons: An Introduction to Solitons and Instantons in Quantum Field Theory, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam (1982).
- R. Rajaraman, Solitons and Instantons: An Introduction to Solitons and Instantons in Quantum Field Theory, North-Holland, 1982.
- Lord Rayleigh, “Remarks upon the law of complete radiation,” Philosophical Magazine, vol. 49, pp. 539–540 (1900); J. H. Jeans, “The distribution of molecular energy,” Philosophical Magazine, vol. 10, pp. 91–98 (1905).
- M. Reed and B. Simon, Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics, Vol. II: Fourier Analysis, Self-Adjointness, Academic Press, 1975.
- T. Regge, “General Relativity Without Coordinates,” Nuovo Cimento, vol. 19, pp. 558–571, 1961.
- C. Rovelli, Quantum Gravity (Cambridge University Press, 2011).
- Y. M. Shnir, Topological and Non-Topological Solitons in Scalar Field Theories, Cambridge University Press, 2018.
- B. Simon, Functional Integration and Quantum Physics, Academic Press, 1979.
- R. Simon, “Peres–Horodecki Separability Criterion for Continuous Variable Systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 84, pp. 2726–2729, 2000.
- T. H. R. Skyrme, “A Nonlinear Field Theory,” Proceedings of the Royal Society A 260, 127–138 (1961).
- T. H. R. Skyrme, “A Nonlinear Field Theory,” Proc. Roy. Soc. A, vol. 260, pp. 127–138, 1961.
- T. H. R. Skyrme, “A Unified Field Theory of Mesons and Baryons,” Nucl. Phys., vol. 31, pp. 556–569, 1962.
- L. Smolin, “The case for background independence,” hep-th/0507235 (2006).
- L. Smolin, “The Case for Background Independence,” in The Structural Foundations of Quantum Gravity, edited by D. Rickles et al., Oxford University Press, 2006.
- L. Susskind, “The World as a Hologram,” J. Math. Phys., vol. 36, pp. 6377–6396, 1995.
- G. ’t Hooft, “Dimensional Reduction in Quantum Gravity,” in Salamfestschrift, World Scientific, 1993.
- M. Tinkham, Introduction to Superconductivity, 2nd ed. (McGraw–Hill, 1996).
- M. Tinkham, Introduction to Superconductivity, 2nd ed. (Dover, 2004).
- M. E. Tuckerman, Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Molecular Simulation (Oxford University Press, 2010).
- W. G. Unruh, “Experimental black-hole evaporation?,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 46, 1351 (1981).
- E. Verlinde, “On the Origin of Gravity and the Laws of Newton,” JHEP, vol. 2011, no. 4, p. 29, 2011.
- G. E. Volovik, The Universe in a Helium Droplet (Oxford Univ. Press, 2003).
- J. von Neumann, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton University Press, 1931).
- D. Wallace, The Emergent Multiverse: Quantum Theory According to the Everett Interpretation (Oxford Univ. Press, 2012).
- S. Weinberg, “The Cosmological Constant Problem,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 61, 1–23 (1989). [CrossRef]
- S. Weinberg, “Quantum mechanics without state vectors,” Phys. Rev. A 90, 042102 (2014).
- J. A. Wheeler, “Geometrodynamics and the Issue of the Final State,” in Relativity, Groups and Topology, eds. B. DeWitt and C. DeWitt (Gordon and Breach, 1964).
- F. Wilczek, “Quantum Time Crystals,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 109, 160401, 2012.
- J. Williamson, “On the Algebraic Problem Concerning the Normal Forms of Linear Dynamical Systems,” Amer. J. Math., vol. 58, pp. 141–163, 1936.
- E. Witten, “Dyons of Charge e/2,” Phys. Lett. B, vol. 86, pp. 283–287, 1979.
- N. M. J. Woodhouse, Geometric Quantization, 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press, 1992).
- W. H. Zurek, “Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 715 (2003).





Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).