Submitted:
29 September 2025
Posted:
30 September 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Passiflora ligularis (granadilla), widely cultivated in Colombia, contains secondary metabolites such as flavonoids, phenols, and pectins. Owing to their strong water-retention capacity, pectins are promising candidates for moisturizing cosmetic formulations. This study optimized pectin extraction from fruit peel and mesocarp using aqueous reflux at 90 °C and acid extraction with citric or hydrochloric acid (0.25 N and 0.125 N) at 40–60 °C. The effects of solvent, method (reflux or microwave-assisted), time (15–25 min), and temperature (50–60 °C) were investigated. Extracted pectins were dried, lyophilized, and incorporated into eight gel-type cosmetic formulations subjected to seven-day preliminary stability testing (physicochemical and organoleptic evaluation). Optimal extraction was achieved with citric acid under microwave irradiation at 60 °C for 15 min, yielding 45.23%. The pectin exhibited low moisture (0.13%), acidity (0.42%), methoxyl content (9.05%), and degree of esterification (57.6%), along with high swelling (1246.26%) and water-retention capacity (1225.77%). The resulting gel formulation was homogeneous and stable. In vitro assays confirmed significant moisturizing activity. These findings highlight P. ligularis pectins as sustainable biopolymers with potential as natural gelling and moisturizing agents in cosmetic products.
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Plant Material
2.2. Exploratory Extraction
2.3. Experimental Design
2.4. Pectin Characterization
2.5. Swelling Capacity and Water Retention Capacity
2.6. ATR-FTIR and NMR Spectroscopy
2.7. Preparation of Cosmetic Formulations
2.8. Preliminary Stability
2.9. Statistical Analysis
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Exploratory Extraction
3.2. Experimental Design
3.3. Pectin Characterization
3.4. Cosmetic Gel Formulations and Preliminary Stability
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Wang, Y.C.; Ma, S.H.; Chang, Y.T.; Chen, C.C. Clinical Evaluation of Skin Aging: A Systematic Review. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2025, 139, 105995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klotz, T.; Moran, H.; Vu, P.; Maddern, G.; Wagstaff, M. Commonly Recommended Moisturising Products: Effect on Transepidermal Water Loss and Hydration in a Scar Model. Burns 2025, 51, 107629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shao, C.; Xiong, R.; Wang, J.; Zhang, X.; Liu, J.; Shen, J. A Dehydratable and Rapidly Rehydratable Hydrogel for Stable Storage and On-Demand Moisturizing Delivery. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 2025, 726, 138102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luna-Perez, Y.; Puertas-Mejia, M.A.; Mejia-Giraldo, J.C. Marine Macroalgae: A Source of Chemical Compounds with Photoprotective and Antiaging Capacity—an Updated Review. J Appl Pharm Sci 2021, 11, 001–011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Wei, J.; Lin, L.; Zheng, G. Extraction, Moisturizing Activity and Potential Application in Skin Cream of Akebia Trifoliata (Thunb.) Koidz Polysaccharide. Ind Crops Prod 2023, 197, 116613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ngouémazong, E.D.; Christiaens, S.; Shpigelman, A.; Van Loey, A.; Hendrickx, M. The Emulsifying and Emulsion-Stabilizing Properties of Pectin: A Review. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 2015, 14, 705–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nagel, A.; Winkler, C.; Carle, R.; Endress, H.; Rentschler, C.; Neidhart, S. Processes Involving Selective Precipitation for the Recovery of Purified Pectins from Mango Peel. Carbohydr Polym 2017, 174, 1144–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Koubala, B.B.; Kansci, G.; Mbome, L.I.; Crépeau, M.J.; Thibault, J.F.; Ralet, M.C. Effect of Extraction Conditions on Some Physicochemical Characteristics of Pectins from “Améliorée” and “Mango” Mango Peels. Food Hydrocoll 2008, 22, 1345–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carmona-Hernandez, J.C.; Taborda-Ocampo, G.; González-Correa, C.H. Folin-Ciocalteu Reaction Alternatives for Higher Polyphenol Quantitation in Colombian Passion Fruits. Int J Food Sci 2021, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vardanega, R.; Fuentes, F.S.; Palma, J.; Bugueño-Muñoz, W.; Cerezal-Mezquita, P.; Ruiz-Dominguéz, M.C. Extraction of Valuable Compounds from Granadilla (Passiflora Ligularis Juss) Peel Using Pressurized Fluids Technologies. Sustain Chem Pharm 2023, 34, 101135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rey, D.; Fernandes, T.A.; Sulis, P.M.; Gonçalves, R.; Sepúlveda R, M.; Silva Frederico, M.J.; Aragon, M.; Ospina, L.F.; Costa, G.M.; Silva, F.R.M.B. Cellular Target of Isoquercetin from Passiflora Ligularis Juss for Glucose Uptake in Rat Soleus Muscle. Chem Biol Interact 2020, 330, 109198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vardanega, R.; Fuentes, F.S.; Palma, J.; Bugueño-Muñoz, W.; Cerezal-Mezquita, P.; Ruiz-Domínguez, M.C. Valorization of Granadilla Waste (Passiflora Ligularis, Juss.) by Sequential Green Extraction Processes Based on Pressurized Fluids to Obtain Bioactive Compounds. J Supercrit Fluids 2023, 194, 105833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barreto, G.E.; Púa, A.L.; Alba, D.D. De; Pión, M.M. Extracción y Caracterización de Pectina de Mango de Azúcar ( Mangifera Indica L .) Extraction and Characterization of Pectin from Sugar Mango ( Mangifera Indica L .). 2017.
- Maxwell, E.G.; Belshaw, N.J.; Waldron, K.W.; Morris, V.J. Pectin - An Emerging New Bioactive Food Polysaccharide. Trends Food Sci Technol 2012, 24, 64–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Freitas de Oliveira, C.; Giordani, D.; Lutckemier, R.; Gurak, P.D.; Cladera-Olivera, F.; Ferreira Marczak, L.D. Extraction of Pectin from Passion Fruit Peel Assisted by Ultrasound. LWT - Food Science and Technology 2016, 71, 110–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silva, N.C.; Benites, E.A.; Carlos, J.; Gomero, M. Extracción y Caracterización de Pectinas Obtenidas a Partir de Frutos de La Biodiversidad Peruana Extraction and Characterization of Pectins in Several Types of Fruits of the Peruvian Biodiversity.
- Dranca, F.; Vargas, M.; Oroian, M. Physicochemical Properties of Pectin from Malus Domestica ‘Fălticeni’ Apple Pomace as Affected by Non-Conventional Extraction Techniques. Food Hydrocoll 2020, 100, 105383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodsamran, P.; Sothornvit, R. Microwave Heating Extraction of Pectin from Lime Peel: Characterization and Properties Compared with the Conventional Heating Method. Food Chem 2019, 278, 364–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, W.; Ma, X.; Jiang, P.; Hu, L.; Zhi, Z.; Chen, J.; Ding, T.; Ye, X.; Liu, D. Characterization of Pectin from Grapefruit Peel: A Comparison of Ultrasound-Assisted and Conventional Heating Extractions. Food Hydrocoll 2016, 61, 730–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dixit, S.S.; Muruganandam, L.; Ganesh Moorthy, I. Pectin from Fruit Peel: A Comprehensive Review on Various Extraction Approaches and Their Potential Applications in Pharmaceutical and Food Industries. Carbohydrate Polymer Technologies and Applications 2025, 9, 100708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rentería-Ortega, M.; Colín-Alvarez, M. de L.; Gaona-Sánchez, V.A.; Chalapud, M.C.; García-Hernández, A.B.; León-Espinosa, E.B.; Valdespino-León, M.; Serrano-Villa, F.S.; Calderón-Domínguez, G. Characterization and Applications of the Pectin Extracted from the Peel of Passiflora Tripartita Var. Mollissima. Membranes (Basel) 2023, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, J. yi; Liao, J. song; Qi, J. ru; Jiang, W. xin; Yang, X. quan Structural and Physicochemical Properties of Pectin-Rich Dietary Fiber Prepared from Citrus Peel. Food Hydrocoll 2021, 110, 106140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Commission CosIng - Cosmetics Ingredients Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/cosing/advanced (accessed on 5 February 2024).
- Agencia Nacional de Vigilancia Sanitaria Guía de Estabilidad de Productos Cosméticos; 2005; pp. 1–52;
- ISO - International Standards Organization ISO/TR 18811:2018. Cosmetics — Guidelines on the Stability Testing of Cosmetic Products; 2028; pp. 1–16;
- Pablo Díaz-Castillo, J.; Jhoana Mier Giraldo, H.; Fernando Sánchez, M.; Nuñez Hernandez, G.; Lucia Camargo Gómez, C.; Janneth Moyano Bonilla Profesional Especializado, L. Estudios de Estabilidad de Productos Cosméticos Recomendaciones Para El Desarrollo de Supervisión y Coordinación: Programa de Calidad Para El Sector Cosméticos-Safe+. Consultor Nacional Calidad Cosméticos, Programa Safe+ de ONUDI Investigación y Escritura; Colombia, 2018; pp. 1–90;
- Nadar, C.G.; Arora, A.; Shastri, Y. Sustainability Challenges and Opportunities in Pectin Extraction from Fruit Waste. ACS Engineering Au 2022, 2, 61–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.W.; Lee, H.V.; Juan, J.C.; Phang, S.-M. Production of New Cellulose Nanomaterial from Red Algae Marine Biomass Gelidium Elegans. Carbohydr Polym 2016, 151, 1210–1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yapo, B.M. Biochemical Characteristics and Gelling Capacity of Pectin from Yellow Passion Fruit Rind as Affected by Acid Extractant Nature. J Agric Food Chem 2009, 57, 1572–1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- C. Rolin, G.B. Seymour, J.P.K. Pectins and Their Manipulation; Blackwell.; 2002.
- Liew, S.Q.; Chin, N.L.; Yusof, Y.A. Extraction and Characterization of Pectin from Passion Fruit Peels. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia 2014, 2, 231–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mao, Y.; Robinson, J.P.; Binner, E.R. Current Status of Microwave-Assisted Extraction of Pectin. Chemical Engineering Journal 2023, 473. [Google Scholar]
- Sarah, M.; Hasibuan, I.M.; Misran, E.; Maulina, S. Optimization of Microwave-Assisted Pectin Extraction from Cocoa Pod Husk. Molecules 2022, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Indriani, R.; Legowo, A.M.; Susanti, S. Characteristics of Pectin Isolated from Mango ( Mangifera Indica ) and Watermelon ( Citrullus Vulgaris ) Peel. 2012, 4, 31–34. [CrossRef]
- Susanti, S.; Legowo, A.M.; Nurwantoro; Silviana; Arifan, F. Comparing the Chemical Characteristics of Pectin Isolated from Various Indonesian Fruit Peels. Indonesian Journal of Chemistry 2021, 21, 1057–1062. [CrossRef]
- Reichembach, L.H.; de Oliveira Petkowicz, C.L. Extraction and Characterization of a Pectin from Coffee (Coffea Arabica L.) Pulp with Gelling Properties. Carbohydr Polym 2020, 245, 116473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lin, Y.; An, F.; He, H.; Geng, F.; Song, H.; Huang, Q. Structural and Rheological Characterization of Pectin from Passion Fruit (Passiflora Edulis f. Flavicarpa) Peel Extracted by High-Speed Shearing. Food Hydrocoll 2021, 114, 106555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valdivia-Rivera, S.; Herrera-Pool, I.E.; Ayora-Talavera, T.; Lizardi-Jiménez, M.A.; García-Cruz, U.; Cuevas-Bernardino, J.C.; Cervantes-Uc, J.M.; Pacheco, N. Kinetic, Thermodynamic, Physicochemical, and Economical Characterization of Pectin from Mangifera Indica L. Cv. Haden Residues. Foods 2021, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.; Zhang, W.; Ai, B.; Zheng, L.; Zheng, X.; Xiao, D.; Sheng, Z.; Yang, J.; Wang, S. Passion Fruit Peel-Derived Low-Methoxyl Pectin: De-Esterification Methods and Application as a Fat Substitute in Set Yogurt. Carbohydr Polym 2025, 347, 122664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Güzel, M.; Akpınar, Ö. Valorisation of Fruit By-Products: Production Characterization of Pectins from Fruit Peels. Food and Bioproducts Processing 2019, 115, 126–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kozioł, A.; Środa-Pomianek, K.; Górniak, A.; Wikiera, A.; Cyprych, K.; Malik, M. Structural Determination of Pectins by Spectroscopy Methods. Coatings 2022, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Contreras-Esquivel, J.C.; Aguilar, C.N.; Montanez, J.C.; Brandelli, A.; Espinoza-Perez, J.D.; Renard, C.M.G.C. Pectin from Passion Fruit Fiber and Its Modification by Pectinmethylesterase. Journal of Food Science and Nutrition 2010, 15, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, X.; Wang, K.; Zhong, Y.; Cui, W.; Jia, X.; Yin, L. Synthesis, Characterization and Application of Sugar Beet Pectin-Ferulic Acid Conjugates in the Study of Lipid, DNA and Protein Oxidation. Int J Biol Macromol 2025, 307, 141358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, Y.; He, H.; Huang, Q.; An, F.; Song, H. Flash Extraction Optimization of Low-Temperature Soluble Pectin from Passion Fruit Peel (Passiflora Edulis f. Flavicarpa) and Its Soft Gelation Properties. Food and Bioproducts Processing 2020, 123, 409–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kar, M.; Chourasiya, Y.; Maheshwari, R.; Tekade, R.K. Current Developments in Excipient Science: Implication of Quantitative Selection of Each Excipient in Product Development. Basic Fundamentals of Drug Delivery 2019, 29–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]


| Ingredient (INCI name) | Concentration (% w/w) | Main function |
| Aqua | 93.1 | Solvent |
| Pectin (P. ligularis) | 5.0 | Binder/Emulsion stabilizer |
| Phenoxyethanol, Ethylhexylglycerin | 1.0 | Antimicrobial/Preservative |
| Carbomer | 0.5 | Rheology modifier |
| Ascorbic acid | 0.4 | Antioxidant |
| Sodium Hydroxide | q.s. | pH adjuster |
| INCI Name | Concentration (% w/w) | Main function | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 | F6 | F7 | F8 |
| Aqua | q.s. to 100% | Solvent | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| Pectin (P. ligularis) | 5.0 | Moisturizing/Gelling agent | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| Phenoxyethanol and Ethylhexylglycerin | 1.0 | Preservative | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| Ascorbic Acid | 0.4 | Antioxidant | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
| Sodium Hydroxide (1M) | q.s. | pH adjuster | X | X | X | X | — | — | X | X |
| Carbomer | 0.5/1.0 | Rheology modifier | — | X | X | X | — | — | X | X |
| Triethanolamine (TEA) | 2.8 % | pH adjuster | — | — | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Guar Hydroxypropyltrimonium Chloride | 0.4/1.0 | Rheology modifier | — | — | — | — | X | X | — | — |
| Condition | Parameter |
| Centrifugation | 3000 rpm, 30 min |
| High temperature | 40 °C, 24 h |
| Room temperature | 25 °C, 24 h |
| Refrigeration | 2 - 8 °C, 24 h |
| Freezing | –5 °C, 24 h |
| Sunlight (UVA, UVB, Visible) | 2 h |
| Experiment | Yield (%) |
| E1 | 6.387 ±0.400 |
| E2 | 6.149 ±1.400 |
| E3 | 6.067±1.100 |
| E4 | 5.847 ±1.800 |
| E5 | 0.499 ±0.300 |
| E6 | 0.513±0.080 |
| E7 | 1.886±0.200 |
| E8 | 0.965±0.300 |
| E9* | 19.300 ±0.100 |
| E10* | 22.435 ±3.500 |
| E11 | 13.544 ±6.800 |
| E12* | 14.530 ±0.300 |
| E13 | 45.970 ±5.500 |
| E14* | 32.855 ±0.700 |
| E15 | 47.373 ±3.500 |
| E16 | 25.496 ±2.200 |
| Parameter | Result ± SD |
| Moisture (%) | 0.13 ± 0.01 |
| Acidity (%) | 0.42 ± 0.01 |
| Methoxyl content (%) | 9.05 ± 0.01 |
| Degree of esterification (%) | 57.6 ± 0.03 |
| Swelling capacity (mL/g) | 12.46 ± 0.01 |
| Water retention (%) | 12.26 ± 0.01 |
| Formulation | Gelling system | pH range | Centrifugation (Day 1) | Heat stability (40 °C) | Cold stability (2–8 °C) | Viscosity change | Sensory changes (color/odor/texture) |
| F1 | Pectin only | 4.5–5.0 | Stable | Significant loss | Moderate precipitation | ↓↓ | Color/odor altered |
| F2 | Carbomer (pH 6.0) | 6.0–6.2 | Stable | Moderate stability | Strong precipitation | ↓↓ | Odor decreased, texture affected |
| F3 | Carbomer (pH 6.2) | 6.0–6.3 | Stable | Moderate stability | Strong precipitation | ↓↓ | Odor decreased, pH fluctuation |
| F4 | Carbomer (pH 6.5) | 6.3–6.5 | Stable | Moderate stability | Strong precipitation | ↓↓ | Texture/graininess |
| F5 | Guar gum | 5.0–5.5 | Stable | Major instability | Precipitation | ↓↓↓ | Residues on skin, odor altered |
| F6 | Guar gum | 5.5–6.0 | Stable | Major instability | Precipitation | ↓↓↓ | Fluid consistency, odor loss |
| F7 | Carbomer (neutralized, pH ≥6.5) | 6.5–6.7 | Stable | High stability | Mild precipitation | ↓ | Good color/odor retention |
| F8 | Carbomer (neutralized, pH ≥6.5) | 6.6–6.8 | Stable | High stability | Mild precipitation | ↓ | Best preserved texture & odor |
| Formulation |
Thermal stability |
Cold stability |
pH stability |
Sensory attributes (odor, texture, spreadability) |
Overall performance |
| F1 | Low | Moderate | Stable | Altered color/odor, rigid texture | Poor |
| F2–F4 | Moderate | Low | Unstable | Reduced odor, precipitation, texture changes | Limited |
| F5–F6 | Very low | Low | Stable | Residues on skin, loss of viscosity, odor loss | Poor |
| F7 | High | Moderate | Moderate | Good texture/odor retention | Good |
| F8 | High | Moderate | Moderate | Excellent texture, odor, and spreadability | Best (selected) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).