Submitted:
19 August 2025
Posted:
20 August 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
This paper explores the engineering innovations and implementation of advanced AI-driven interactive educational avatars as key components of Serbia’s smart education initiatives. The integration of artificial intelligence into educational contexts has significantly transformed traditional pedagogical methods, offering highly personalised and adaptive learning experiences. This study specifically investigates Serbian teachers’ attitudes toward using educational avatars informed by non-formal training experiences. Employing a quantitative research design, data were collected from 173 teachers across various educational levels, from preschool to university, using a structured online questionnaire. Statistical analyses revealed significant positive correlations between teachers’ experiences with avatars and their attitudes toward avatar integration, highlighting particularly strong associations with interactive avatars capable of two-way communication and content adaptation. Furthermore, the paper details the sophisticated engineering underpinning these avatars, encompassing machine-learning algorithms, deep-learning architectures, natural-language processing, speech recognition and multimodal emotional and behavioural analytics. Real-time adaptability, scalability and ethical considerations—such as data security and user privacy—are crucial aspects emphasised in the design and implementation phases. Institutional roles, notably the contributions of the Centre for Robotics and Artificial Intelligence in Education (CRAIE), are discussed, emphasising structured professional development and interdisciplinary collaboration. The study concludes that comprehensive educator training, robust ethical governance and interdisciplinary partnerships are essential for the successful integration and widespread adoption of interactive educational avatars in Serbia, thereby advancing inclusive, equitable and globally competitive educational practices.
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. AI Avatars and the Serbian Educational Context



3. Method
4. Results and Discussion
5. Conclusion
6. Note
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional review board statement
Informed consent statement
Data availability statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of interest
References
- Karataş, F.; Eriçok, B.; Tanrikulu, L. Reshaping curriculum adaptation in the age of artificial intelligence: mapping teachers’ AI-driven curriculum adaptation patterns. British Educational Research Journal 2024, 51, 154–180. [CrossRef]
- Milutinović, V.; Đorđević, S.; Mandić, D. Cryptography in organising online collaborative math problem solving. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education 2025, 13, 191–206. [CrossRef]
- Zhai, X. Transforming teachers’ roles and agencies in the era of generative AI: perceptions, acceptance, knowledge and practices. Journal of Science Education and Technology 2024, 1–11. [CrossRef]
- Mandić, D. Report on smart education in the Republic of Serbia. In Smart Education in China and Central & Eastern European Countries; Zhuang, R.; Liu, D.; Sampson, D.; et al., Eds.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2023; pp. 271–292. [CrossRef]
- Wang, S. Hybrid models of piano instruction: how combining traditional teaching methods with personalised AI feedback affects learners’ skill acquisition, self-efficacy and academic locus of control. Education and Information Technologies 2025, 1–23. [CrossRef]
- Radulović, B.; Džinović, M.; Miščević, G. Using a longitudinal trajectory of pre-service elementary school teachers’ metacognition as a quality indicator of higher education. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education 2024, 12, 251–257. [CrossRef]
- Mandić, D.; Miščević, G.; Bujisić, Lj. Evaluating the quality of responses generated by ChatGPT. Metodicka teorija i praksa 2024, 27, 5–19. [CrossRef]
- Mandić, D.; Miščević, G.; Babić, J.; Matović, S. Educational robots in teachers’ education. Research in Pedagogy 2024, 14, 361–376. [CrossRef]
- Yang, J.; Sun, Y.; Lin, R.; Zhu, H. Strategic framework and global trends of national smart-education policies. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 2024, 11, 1–13. [CrossRef]
- Huang, R.; Liu, D.; Kanwar, A.S.; Zhan, T.; Yang, J.; Zhuang, R.; Liu, M.; Li, Z.; Adarkwah, M.A. Global understanding of smart education in the context of digital transformation. Open Praxis 2024, 16, 663–676. [CrossRef]
- Ristić, M.; Mandić, D. Readiness of the education system for mobile learning. Sociološki pregled 2018, 52, 1044–1071. [CrossRef]
- Mandić, D.; Miščević, G.; Ristić, M. Teachers’ perspectives on the use of interactive educational avatars: insights from non-formal training contexts. Research in Pedagogy 2025, 15. [CrossRef]
| Teaching level | N | Mean | SD | Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preschool teacher | 46 | 25.74 | 5.63 | 26 |
| Teacher for younger grades of elementary school | 75 | 23.49 | 5.69 | 23 |
| Teacher for senior grades of elementary and secondary schools | 31 | 24.84 | 4.89 | 25 |
| University professor | 21 | 32.14 | 5.29 | 33 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).