Submitted:
15 July 2025
Posted:
16 July 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
2.2. Methods
3. Results
3.1. Low-Temperature Nitrogen Physisorption
3.2. Powder X-ray Diffraction (XRD)
3.3. Moessbauer Spectroscopy
3.4. Temperature Programmed Reduction-Thermo-Gravimetric (TPR–TG) Experiments
3.5. Catalytic Test
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| XRD | X-ray diffraction |
| TPR–TG | Temperature programmed reduction-thermo-gravimetric experiments |
| AC-A | activated carbons - spent motor oil and pine wood chips |
| AC-B | activated carbons - spent motor oil and crushed coal from "Chukurovo" mine |
| ND | Nanodiamond powder |
| GOL | Graphene oxide |
References
- Dincer, I.; Acar, C. Review and Evaluation of Hydrogen Production Methods for Better Sustainability. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2015, 40, 11094–11111. [CrossRef]
- Luo, M.; Yi, Y.; Wang, S.; Wang, Z.; Du, M.; Pan, J.; Wang, Q. Review of Hydrogen Production Using Chemical-Looping Technology. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 81, 3186–3214. [CrossRef]
- Boretti, A.; Pollet, B.G. Hydrogen Economy: Paving the Path to a Sustainable, Low-Carbon Future. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 93, 307–319. [CrossRef]
- Karakoti, A.S.; King, J.E.S.; Vincent, A.; Seal, S. Synthesis Dependent Core Level Binding Energy Shift in the Oxidation State of Platinum Coated on Ceria–Titania and Its Effect on Catalytic Decomposition of Methanol. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2010, 388, 262–271. [CrossRef]
- Jampa, S.; Jamieson, A.M.; Chaisuwan, T.; Luengnaruemitchai, A.; Wongkasemjit, S. Achievement of Hydrogen Production from Autothermal Steam Reforming of Methanol over Cu-Loaded Mesoporous CeO2 and Cu-Loaded Mesoporous CeO2–ZrO2 Catalysts. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 15073–15084. [CrossRef]
- Clarizia, L.; Spasiano, D.; Di Somma, I.; Marotta, R.; Andreozzi, R.; Dionysiou, D.D. Copper Modified-TiO2 Catalysts for Hydrogen Generation through Photoreforming of Organics. A Short Review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2014, 39, 16812–16831. [CrossRef]
- Matsumura, Y.; Shen, W.-J. Methanol Decomposition and Synthesis Over Palladium Catalysts. Top. Catal. 2003, 22, 271–275. [CrossRef]
- Hill, J.M. Sustainable and/or Waste Sources for Catalysts: Porous Carbon Development and Gasification. Catal. Today 2017, 285, 204–210. [CrossRef]
- Hadi, P.; Xu, M.; Ning, C.; Sze Ki Lin, C.; McKay, G. A Critical Review on Preparation, Characterization and Utilization of Sludge-Derived Activated Carbons for Wastewater Treatment. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 260, 895–906. [CrossRef]
- Yahya, M.A.; Al-Qodah, Z.; Ngah, C.W.Z. Agricultural Bio-Waste Materials as Potential Sustainable Precursors Used for Activated Carbon Production: A Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 46, 218–235. [CrossRef]
- Menya, E.; Olupot, P.W.; Storz, H.; Lubwama, M.; Kiros, Y. Production and Performance of Activated Carbon from Rice Husks for Removal of Natural Organic Matter from Water: A Review. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2018, 129, 271–296. [CrossRef]
- Bader, N.; Ouederni, A. Functionalized and Metal-Doped Biomass-Derived Activated Carbons for Energy Storage Application. J. Energy Storage 2017, 13, 268–276. [CrossRef]
- Danish, M.; Ahmad, T. A Review on Utilization of Wood Biomass as a Sustainable Precursor for Activated Carbon Production and Application. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 87, 1–21. [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Li, X.; Chen, H.; Qi, M.; Zhang, G.; Hu, H.; Ma, X. Hydrogen Production by Catalytic Methane Decomposition: Carbon Materials as Catalysts or Catalyst Supports. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 19755–19775. [CrossRef]
- Szymańska, M.; Malaika, A.; Rechnia, P.; Miklaszewska, A.; Kozłowski, M. Metal/Activated Carbon Systems as Catalysts of Methane Decomposition Reaction. Catal. Today 2015, 249, 94–102. [CrossRef]
- Konwar, L.J.; Boro, J.; Deka, D. Review on Latest Developments in Biodiesel Production Using Carbon-Based Catalysts. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 29, 546–564. [CrossRef]
- Kim, H.; Kim, H.; Weon, S.; Moon, G.; Kim, J.-H.; Choi, W. Robust Co-Catalytic Performance of Nanodiamonds Loaded on WO3 for the Decomposition of Volatile Organic Compounds under Visible Light. ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 8350–8360. [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Shen, R.; Ma, S.; Chen, X.; Xie, J. Graphene-Based Heterojunction Photocatalysts. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 430, 53–107. [CrossRef]
- Morales-Torres, S.; Pastrana-Martínez, L.M.; Figueiredo, J.L.; Faria, J.L.; Silva, A.M.T. Graphene Oxide-P25 Photocatalysts for Degradation of Diphenhydramine Pharmaceutical and Methyl Orange Dye. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013, 275, 361–368. [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.; Cui, Y.; Li, X.; Shen, S.; Liao, W.; You, H. Novel Ceria/Graphene Oxide Composite Abrasives for Chemical Mechanical Polishing. Ceram. Int. 2024, 50, 26325–26333. [CrossRef]
- Srivastava, M.; Das, A.K.; Khanra, P.; Uddin, M.E.; Kim, N.H.; Lee, J.H. Characterizations of in Situ Grown Ceria Nanoparticles on Reduced Graphene Oxide as a Catalyst for the Electrooxidation of Hydrazine. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 9792–9801. [CrossRef]
- Sakthivel, T.S.; Das, S.; Pratt, C.J.; Seal, S. One-Pot Synthesis of a Ceria–Graphene Oxide Composite for the Efficient Removal of Arsenic Species. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 3367–3374. [CrossRef]
- Zhou, C.; Xu, X.; Dai, L.; Gong, H.; Lin, S. Chemical-Mechanical Polishing Performance of Core-Shell Structured Polystyrene@ceria/Nanodiamond Ternary Abrasives on Sapphire Wafer. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 31691–31701. [CrossRef]
- Dimitrov, M.; Issa, G.; Kovacheva, D.; Tsoncheva, T. Novel Ceria and Ceria-Based Nanocomposites as Potential Catalysts for Methanol Decomposition and Total Oxidation of Ethyl Acetate. Proc. Bulg. Acad. Sci. 2022, 75, 1287–1294. [CrossRef]
- Zhou, L.; Ji, L.; Ma, P.-C.; Shao, Y.; Zhang, H.; Gao, W.; Li, Y. Development of Carbon Nanotubes/CoFe2O4 Magnetic Hybrid Material for Removal of Tetrabromobisphenol A and Pb(II). J. Hazard. Mater. 2014, 265, 104–114. [CrossRef]
- Tu, Y.-J.; You, C.-F. Phosphorus Adsorption onto Green Synthesized Nano-Bimetal Ferrites: Equilibrium, Kinetic and Thermodynamic Investigation. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 251, 285–292. [CrossRef]
- Shao, L.; Ren, Z.; Zhang, G.; Chen, L. Facile Synthesis, Characterization of a MnFe2O4/Activated Carbon Magnetic Composite and Its Effectiveness in Tetracycline Removal. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2012, 135, 16–24. [CrossRef]
- Rehman, M.A.; Yusoff, I.; Alias, Y. Fluoride Adsorption by Doped and Un-Doped Magnetic Ferrites CuCexFe2-XO4: Preparation, Characterization, Optimization and Modeling for Effectual Remediation Technologies. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015, 299, 316–324. [CrossRef]
- Velinov, N.; Manova, E.; Tsoncheva, T.; Estournès, C.; Paneva, D.; Tenchev, K.; Petkova, V.; Koleva, K.; Kunev, B.; Mitov, I. Spark Plasma Sintering Synthesis of Ni1−xZnxFe2O4 Ferrites: Mössbauer and Catalytic Study. Solid State Sci. 2012, 14, 1092–1099. [CrossRef]
- Velinov, N.; Koleva, K.; Tsoncheva, T.; Manova, E.; Paneva, D.; Tenchev, K.; Kunev, B.; Mitov, I. Nanosized Cu0.5Co0.5Fe2O4 Ferrite as Catalyst for Methanol Decomposition: Effect of Preparation Procedure. Catal. Commun. 2013, 32, 41–46. [CrossRef]
- Manova, E.; Tsoncheva, T.; Paneva, D.; Popova, M.; Velinov, N.; Kunev, B.; Tenchev, K.; Mitov, I. Nanosized Copper Ferrite Materials: Mechanochemical Synthesis and Characterization. J. Solid State Chem. 2011, 184, 1153–1158. [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Yan, Q.; Jiang, Q.; Gao, Y.; Xue, T.; Li, R.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Q. Oxygen Vacancy Mediated CuyCo3-YFe1Ox Mixed Oxide as Highly Active and Stable Toluene Oxidation Catalyst by Multiple Phase Interfaces Formation and Metal Doping Effect. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2020, 269, 118827. [CrossRef]
- Rajabi, S.; Nasiri, A.; Hashemi, M. Enhanced Activation of Persulfate by CuCoFe2O4@MC/AC as a Novel Nanomagnetic Heterogeneous Catalyst with Ultrasonic for Metronidazole Degradation. Chemosphere 2022, 286, 131872. [CrossRef]
- Nasiri, A.; Rajabi, S.; Amiri, A.; Fattahizade, M.; Hasani, O.; Lalehzari, A.; Hashemi, M. Adsorption of Tetracycline Using CuCoFe2O4@Chitosan as a New and Green Magnetic Nanohybrid Adsorbent from Aqueous Solutions: Isotherm, Kinetic and Thermodynamic Study. Arab. J. Chem. 2022, 15, 104014. [CrossRef]
- Nasiri, A.; Rajabi, S.; Hashemi, M.; Nasab, H. CuCoFe2O4@MC/AC as a New Hybrid Magnetic Nanocomposite for Metronidazole Removal from Wastewater: Bioassay and Toxicity of Effluent. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 296, 121366. [CrossRef]
- Tsoncheva, T.; Mileva, A.; Paneva, D.; Kovacheva, D.; Spassova, I.; Nihtianova, D.; Markov, P.; Petrov, N.; Mitov, I. Zinc Ferrites Hosted in Activated Carbon from Waste Precursors as Catalysts in Methanol Decomposition. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2016, 229, 59–67. [CrossRef]
- Broekhoff, J.C.P. Mesopore Determination from Nitrogen Sorption Isotherms: Fundamentals, Scope, Limitations. In Preparation of Catalysts II; Delmon, B., Grange, P., Jacobs, P., Poncelet, G.B.T.-S. in S.S. and C., Eds.; Elsevier, 1979; Vol. 3, pp. 663–684 ISBN 0167-2991.
- Tsoncheva, T.; Rosmini, C.; Dimitrov, M.; Issa, G.; Henych, J.; Němečková, Z.; Kovacheva, D.; Velinov, N.; Atanasova, G.; Spassova, I. Formation of Catalytic Active Sites in Hydrothermally Obtained Binary Ceria–Iron Oxides: Composition and Preparation Effects. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 1838–1852. [CrossRef]
- Tsoncheva, T.; Mileva, A.; Issa, G.; Henych, J.; Tolasz, J.; Dimitrov, M.; Kovacheva, D.; Atanasova, G.; Štengl, V. Mesoporous Copper-Ceria-Titania Ternary Oxides as Catalysts for Environmental Protection: Impact of Ce/Ti Ratio and Preparation Procedure. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2020, 595, 117487. [CrossRef]
- Deshmukh, S.S.; Humbe, A. V; Kumar, A.; Dorik, R.G.; Jadhav, K.M. Urea Assisted Synthesis of Ni1−xZnxFe2O4 (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.8): Magnetic and Mössbauer Investigations. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 704, 227–236. [CrossRef]
- Borhan, A.I.; Ghercă, D.; Iordan, A.R.; Palamaru, M.N. 2 - Classification and Types of Ferrites. In Woodhead Publishing Series in Electronic and Optical Materials; Pal Singh, J., Chae, K.H., Srivastava, R.C., Caltun, O.F.B.T.-F.N.M.M., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing, 2023; pp. 17–34 ISBN 978-0-12-823717-5.
- Dow, W.-P.; Wang, Y.-P.; Huang, T.-J. TPR and XRD Studies of Yttria-Doped Ceria/γ-Alumina-Supported Copper Oxide Catalyst. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2000, 190, 25–34. [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Chen, J.; Watanabe, H.; Xu, Y.; Tamura, M.; Nakagawa, Y.; Tomishige, K. Catalytic Performance and Characterization of Co–Fe Bcc Alloy Nanoparticles Prepared from Hydrotalcite-like Precursors in the Steam Gasification of Biomass-Derived Tar. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2014, 160–161, 701–715. [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Hisada, Y.; Koike, M.; Li, D.; Watanabe, H.; Nakagawa, Y.; Tomishige, K. Catalyst Property of Co–Fe Alloy Particles in the Steam Reforming of Biomass Tar and Toluene. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2012, 121–122, 95–104. [CrossRef]



| Sample | SBET, m2g-1 | Smic, m2g-1 | Vmic, cm3g-1 | Vt, cm3g-1 |
| CeND1 | 149.2 | - | - | 0.172 |
| CoCuFe2O4/CeND1 | 90.9 | - | - | 0.072 |
| Ce ND5 | 150.5 | - | - | 0.189 |
| CoCuFe2O4/CeND5 | 89.1 | - | - | 0.073 |
| CeND10 | 166.5 | - | - | 0.204 |
| CoCuFe2O4/CeND10 | 91.9 | - | - | 0.082 |
| CeGOL5 | 157.7 | 14.2 | 0.006 | 0.741 |
| CoCuFe2O4/CeGOL5 | 94.0 | - | - | 0.246 |
| Ce GOL10 | 163.2 | 11.1 | 0.004 | 0.339 |
| CoCuFe2O4/CeGOL10 | 70.0 | - | - | 0.149 |
| CeGOL20 | 186.3 | 22.9 | 0.009 | 0.391 |
| CoCuFe2O4/CeGOL20 | 56.1 | - | - | 0.134 |
| AC-A | 460.7 | 410.4 | 0.168 | 0.327 |
| CoCuFe2O4/AC-A | 352.3 | 269.1 | 0.117 | 0.243 |
| AC-B | 430.7 | 367.9 | 0.151 | 0.334 |
| CoCuFe2O4/AC-B | 338.2 | 260.5 | 0.114 | 0.241 |
| Sample | Phase composition | Cell parameters, Å | Crystallite size, nm |
| CoCuFe2O4/CeND1 | CeO2, Cubic Fm-3m |
5.406 (2) | 6 |
| CoCuFe2O4/CeND5 | CeO2, Cubic Fm-3m |
5.408 (2) | 7 |
| CoCuFe2O4/CeND10 | CeO2, Cubic Fm-3m |
5.412 (2) | 7 |
| CoCuFe2O4/CeGOL5 | CeO2, Cubic Fm-3m |
5.402 (2) | 6 |
| CoCuFe2O4/CeGOL10 | CeO2, Cubic Fm-3m |
5.409 (1) | 8 |
| CoCuFe2O4/CeGOL20 | CeO2, Cubic Fm-3m |
5.407 (1) | 7 |
| CoCuFe2O4/AC-A | (Cu,Co)Fe2O4 | 8.40 (1) | 4 |
| CoCuFe2O4/AC-B | (Cu,Co)Fe2O4 | 8.409 (9) | 5 |
| Sample | Components |
δ, mm/s |
Δ (2ε), mm/s |
Bhf, T |
Γexp, mm/s |
G, % |
| CoCuFe2O4/CeND10 | Db - Fe3+ Sx1 - Fe3+tetra Sx2 - Fe3+octa |
0.31 0.25 0.31 |
0.85 0.00 0.00 |
- 42.9 47.9 |
0.58 0.80 0.99 |
78 8 14 |
| CoCuFe2O4/CeGOL10 | Db - Fe3+ Sx1 - Fe3+tetra Sx2 - Fe3+octa |
0.30 0.29 0.33 |
0.89 0.00 0.00 |
- 40.4 46.6 |
0.57 1.00 1.10 |
78 6 16 |
| CoCuFe2O4/AC-A | Db - Fe3+ Sx1 - Fe3+tetra Sx2 - Fe3+octa |
0.29 0.30 0.36 |
0.87 0.00 0.00 |
- 47.0 43.0 |
0.80 1.20 2.00 |
71 4 25 |
| CoCuFe2O4/AC-B | Db - Fe3+ Sx1 - Fe3+tetra Sx2 - Fe3+octa Sx3 - Fe3+ |
0.29 0.29 0.45 0.31 |
0.85 0.00 -0.06 0.03 |
- 47.8 42.5 33.1 |
0.78 0.79 1.17 2.57 |
28 8 11 53 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).