Submitted:
04 June 2025
Posted:
04 June 2025
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Raw Materials
2.2. Chemical Composition of Raw Materials
2.3. Pasta Preparation
2.4. Pasta Characterization
2.4.1. Measurement of the Length, Width, and Thickness of Pasta
2.4.2. Determination of Water Absorption Index and Water Solubility Index
2.4.3. Color Profile Evaluation
2.5. Culinary Quality Assessment
2.5.1. Minimum Cooking Time
2.5.2. Water Absorption Capacity
2.5.3. Cooking Loss
2.6. Texture Profile Analysis
2.7. Functional Components and Antioxidant Activity Analyses of Raw Materials and Pasta Products
2.7.1. Accelerated Solvent Extraction (ASE)
2.7.2. Qualitative Analysis of Selected Polyphenolic Compounds by high-Performance Liquid Chromatography Coupled to a Mass Spectrometer (HPLC/ESI-TOF-MS)
2.7.3. Determination of the Total Content of Polyphenolic Compounds
2.7.4. Determination of Total Flavonoid Content
2.7.5. Spectrophotometric Analysis of the Obtained Extracts to Determine Their Antioxidant Properties
2.7.6. TLC-DPPH Test of the Obtained Extracts
2.8. Microstructure Observations
2.9. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Results of Chemical Composition of Raw Materials
3.2. Pasta Characterization Results
3.2.1. Geometric Dimensions of Pasta Samples
3.2.2. Water Absorption Index (WAI) and Water Solubility Index (WSI) Results of Pasta
3.2.3. Results of Pasta Color Profile
3.3. Culinary Quality of Pasta
3.4. Texture Profile of Cooked Pasta
3.5. Results of Functional Components and Antioxidant Activity of Raw Materials and Pasta Products
3.5.1. Results of Qualitative Analysis of Selected Polyphenolic Compounds in Raw Materials by HPLC/ESI-TOF-MS
3.5.2. Results of Total Content of Polyphenolic Compounds (TPC)
3.5.3. Results of Total Flavonoid Content (TFC)
3.5.4. Results of Antioxidant Properties of Raw Materials and Pasta by Spectrophotometric Method Using DPPH
3.5.5. TLC-DPPH Results of the Extracts Obtained From Raw Materials and Pasta Products
3.6. Pasta Microstructure
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Romano, A.; Ferranti, P.; Gallo, V.; Masi, P. New ingredients and alternatives to durum wheat semolina for a high quality dried pasta. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2021, 41, 249–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gallo, V.; Romano, A.; Masi, P. Does the presence of fibres affect the microstructure and in vitro starch digestibility of commercial Italian pasta? Food Struct. 2020, 24, 100139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hammami, R.; Sissons, M. Durum wheat products: Couscous. In Wheat Quality for Improving Processing and Human Health, G. Igrejas, T. M. Ikeda, & C. Guzmán Eds., Springer, 2020, pp. 345–366. [CrossRef]
- Carpentieri, S.; Larrea-Wachtendorff, D.; Donsì, F.; Ferrari, G. Functionalization of pasta through the incorporation of bioactive compounds from agri-food by-products: Fundamentals, opportunities, and drawbacks. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 122, 49–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rawat, N.; Indrani, D. Functional ingredients of wheat-based bakery, traditional, pasta, and other food products. Food Rev. Intern. 2015, 31(2), 125–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boukid, F. (Ed.). Cereal-Based Foodstuffs: The Backbone of Mediterranean Cuisine. Springer International Publishing, 2021. [CrossRef]
- Hunter, J.B.; Emanuel, J.; Drysdale, A.E. Food Service and Food System Logistics at the South Pole: Lessons for a Lunar/Martian Planetary Surface Mission. SAE Technical Paper Series, 2003, 01, 2365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- AFNOR. NF V03-733:2000. Expression des résultats analytiques – Présentation des résultats avec leurs chiffres significatifs et leur incertitude. Association Française de Normalisation, Paris, 2000.
- AFNOR. NF V03-707:2000. Produits alimentaires – Dosage des cendres – Méthode gravimétrique. Association Française de Normalisation, Paris, 2000.
- AFNOR. NF V03-720:2000. Produits alimentaires – Expression des résultats – Arrondissement des chiffres. Association Française de Normalisation, Paris, 2000.
- ISO. ISO 20483:2006. Cereals and pulses – Determination of the nitrogen content and calculation of the crude protein content – Kjeldahl method. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 2006.
- AOAC International. Official Method 920.39 – Fat (Crude) or Ether Extract in Foods. In Official Methods of Analysis, 18th ed.; AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD, 2005.
- AOAC International. Official Method 985.29 – Total Dietary Fiber in Foods. In Official Methods of Analysis, 18th ed.; AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD, 2005.
- Callister, W.D.; Rethwisch, D.G. Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction. 10th ed., Hoboken (NJ), Wiley, 2018. Available from: https://www.wiley.com/en.
- Wójtowicz, A.; Mościcki, L. Influence of legume type and addition level on quality characteristics, texture and microstructure of enriched precooked pasta. LWT - Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 59, 1175–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cavazza, A.; Corradini, C.; Rinaldi, M.; Salvadeo, P.; Borromei, C.; Massini, R. Evaluation of pasta thermal treatment by determination of carbohydrates, furosine, and color indices. Food Bioprocess. Technol. 2013, 6, 2721–2731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Romankiewicz, D.; Hassoon, W.H.; Cacak-Pietrzak, G.; Sobczyk, M.; Wirkowska-Wojdyła, M.; Ceglińska, A.; Dziki, D. The effect of chia seeds (Salvia hispanica L.) addition on quality and nutritional value of wheat bread. J. Food Quality. 2017, 7352631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- AACC. Approved Methods of the American Association of Cereal Chemists, AACC, St. Paul, MN, USA, 2000.
- Chillo, S.; Laverse, J.; Falcone, P.; Del Nobile, M. Quality of spaghetti in base amaranthus wholemeal flour added with quinoa, broad bean and chick pea. J. Food Eng. 2008, 84, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bouasla, A.; Wójtowicz, A.; Zidoune, M.N.; Olech, M.; Nowak, R.; Mitrus, M.; Oniszczuk, A. Gluten-free precooked rice-yellow pea pasta: Effect of extrusion-cooking conditions on phenolic acids composition, selected properties and microstructure. J. Food Sci. 2016, 81, C1070–C1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szydłowska-Tutaj, M.; Złotek, U.; Wójtowicz, A.; Combrzyński, M. The effect of the addition of various species of mushrooms on the physicochemical and sensory properties of semolina pasta. Food Funct. 2022, 13(16), 8425–8435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lewko, P.; Wójtowicz, A.; Kamiński, D.M. The influence of processing using conventional and hybrid methods on the composition, polysaccharide profiles and selected properties of wheat flour enriched with baking enzymes. Foods 2024, 13, 2957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kasprzak-Drozd, K.; Oniszczuk, T.; Kowalska, I.; Mołdoch, J.; Combrzyński, M.; Gancarz, M.; Dobrzański, B.; Kondracka, A.; Oniszczuk, A. Effect of the production parameters and in vitro digestion on the content of polyphenolic compounds, phenolic acids, and antiradical properties of innovative snacks enriched with wild garlic (Allium ursinum L.) leaves. Int. J. Molecul. Sci. 2022, 23(24), 14458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gopalan, C.; Ramasastri, B.V.; Balasubramanian, S.C. Nutritive Value of Indian Foods. National Institute of Nutrition (NIN), Indian Council of Medical Research, 2004.
- Zhang, Y.; Zhao, X.; Chen, L.; Liu, Y. Influence of water activity on shelf life and quality of cereal products: A review. Food Control 2021, 121, 107567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ranhotra, G.S.; Gelroth, J.A.; Lorenz, K. Nutritional composition of wheat and wheat products: The effect of bran, germ and fiber. Cereal Chem. 2020, 97(3), 327–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Călinoiu, L.F.; Gheldiu, A.M.; Vodnar, D.C.; Socaci, S.A. Wholegrain and bran fraction in cereal-based foods: Health impacts and recent advances. Nutrients 2022, 14(2), 298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhatta, M.; Arendt, E.K.; Gallagher, E. The impact of milling on nutritional and functional properties of wheat and rye flours: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 100, 120–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, P.; Sinha, A.K.; Makkar, H.P.S.; Becker, K. Dietary fibers and gut microbiota: Mechanisms and health benefits. Critic. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 62(12), 3232–3248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silva, F.A.; Lopes, C.M.; Santos, L.M. Development of low-calorie functional foods: Trends and challenges. Food Res. Int. 2019, 123, 310–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Codex Alimentarius Commission. Codex Standard for Pasta (CODEX STAN 212-1999). Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization, 2019. https://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/codex-texts/list-standards/en/.
- Giuberti, G.; Cerioli, C.; Galli, V.; Gallo, V. Influence of raw material and processing parameters on pasta quality: A review. Food Res. Int. 2020, 137, 109706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, S.K.; Kim, H.; Lee, M. Moisture content and water activity effects on microbial stability and shelf life of dried pasta products. Food Microbiol. 2021, 94, 103641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Y.; He, J.; Wang, J.; Wang, X. Water absorption index and solubility index in cereal-based products: Impact on cooking and sensory quality. J. Cereal Sci. 2022, 101, 103376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cappa, C.; Cattivelli, L.; Borrelli, G.M. Role of starch damage and protein content on water absorption indices of pasta made from durum wheat. LWT - Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 117, 108608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rashid, M.A.; Khan, M.I.; Husain, S.Z. Influence of damaged starch on cooking quality and nutrient retention in pasta products. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2019, 43(9), e14069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sujka, K.; Cacak-Pietrzak, G.; Sułek, A.; Murgrabia, K.; Dziki, D. Buckwheat hull-enriched pasta: Physicochemical and sensory properties. Molecules 2022, 27, 4065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sissons, M.; Abecassis, J.; Marchylo, B.; Cubadda, R. Methods used to assess and predict quality of durum wheat, semolina, and pasta. In Durum Wheat: Chemistry and Technology, M. Sissons, J. Abecassis, B. Marchylo, and M. Carcea (Eds.); 2nd ed., AACC International, Inc., St. Paul, MN, USA, 2012, pp. 213–234. [CrossRef]
- Oladunmoye, O. Physico-chemical, nutritional and sensory qualities of cassava-wheat semolina macaroni noodles. Doctoral dissertation, 2012. http://ir.library.ui.edu.ng/handle/123456789/9462.
- Feillet, P.; Autran, J.C.; Icard-Vernière, C. Pasta brownness: An assessment. J. Cereal Sci. 2000, 32(3), 215–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Inácio, L.G.; Bernardino, R.; Bernardino, S.; Afonso, C. Acorns: From an ancient food to a modern sustainable resource. Sustainability, 2024, 16(22), 9613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rather, M.A.; Thakur, R.; Hoque, M.; Das, R.S.; Miki, K.S.L.; Teixeira-Costa, B.E.; Gupta, A.K. Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor): Phytochemical composition, bio-functional, and technological characteristics. In Nutri-Cereals: Nutraceutical and Techno-Functional Potential, Sharma, R., Nanda, V., Sharma, S., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2023, pp. 45–77.
- Biernacka, B.; Dziki, D.; Gawlik-Dziki, U.; Różyło, R. Common wheat pasta enriched with cereal coffee: Quality and physical and functional properties. LWT—Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 139, 110516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martín-Esparza, M.E.; Raigón, M.D.; Raga, A.; Albors, A. High fibre tiger nut pasta and xanthan gum: cooking quality, microstructure, physico-chemical properties and consumer acceptance. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2018, 27(4), 1075–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bustos, M.C.; Pérez, G.T.; León, A.E. Influence of fiber-rich ingredients on quality of pasta. Food Rev. Int. 2020, 36(5), 431–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martínez, M. M.; Li, C.; Dhital, S.; Gidley, M. J. Structural basis and kinetics of starch digestion. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 108, 524–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guerra, A.; Bresciani, A.; Marti, A.; Pagani, M. A.; Iametti, S. Understanding the protein-starch matrix in pasta: Implications for quality and digestibility. LWT – Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 177, 114547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhattacharya, M.; Zee, S.Y.; Corke, H. Physicochemical properties related to quality of rice noodles. Cereal Chem. 1999, 76, 861–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bolarinwa, I. F.; Oyesiji, O. O. Gluten free rice-soy pasta: proximate composition, textural properties and sensory attributes. Heliyon 2021, 7(1), e06052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rao, S.; Santhakumar, A.B.; Chinkwo, K.A.; Wu, G.; Johnson, S.K.; Blanchard, C.L. Characterization of phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity in sorghum grains. J. Cereal Sci. 2018, 84, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Morais Cardoso, L.; Pinheiro, S.S.; Martino, H.S.D.; Pinheiro-Sant’Ana, H.M. Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.): Nutrients, bioactive compounds, and potential impact on human health. Critic. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 57(2), 372–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tanase, C.; Nicolescu, A.; Nisca, A.; Ștefănescu, R.; Babotă, M.; Mare, A.D.; Ciurea, C.N.; Man, A. Biological activity of bark extracts from northern red oak (Quercus rubra L.): An antioxidant, antimicrobial and enzymatic inhibitory evaluation. Plants 2022, 11, 2357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dacrema, M.; Sommella, E.; Santarcangelo, C.; Bruno, B.; Marano, M.G.; Insolia, V.; Saviano, A.; Campiglia, P.; Stornaiuolo, M.; Daglia, M. Metabolic profiling, in vitro bioaccessibility and in vivo bioavailability of a commercial bioactive Epilobium angustifolium L. extract. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020, 131, 110670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Durazzo, A.; Azzini, E.; Turfani, V.; Polito, A.; Maiani, G.; Carcea, M. Effect of cooking on lignans content in whole-grain pasta made with different cereals and other seeds. Cereal Chem. 2013, 90(2), 193–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Punia, H.; Tokas, J.; Malik, A.; Sangwan, S. Characterization of phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) grains. Cereal Res. Commun. 2021, 49(3), 343–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Przybylska-Balcerek, A.; Frankowski, J.; Stuper-Szablewska, K. Bioactive compounds in sorghum. Europ. Food Res. Technol. 2019, 245(6), 1075–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Altunkaya, A.; Gökmen, V.; Skibsted, L. H. pH dependent antioxidant activity of lettuce (L. sativa) and synergism with added phenolic antioxidants. Food Chem. 2016, 190, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khan, I.; Yousif, A.M.; Johnson, S.K.; Gamlath, S. Acute effect of sorghum flour containing pasta on plasma total polyphenols, antioxidant capacity and oxidative stress markers in healthy subjects: A randomised controlled trial. Clinic. Nutr. 2015, 34(3), 415–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Burda, S.; Oleszek, W. Antioxidant and antiradical activities of flavonoids. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 49(6), 2774–2779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seraglio, S.K.T.; Valese, A.C.; Daguer, H.; Bergamo, G.; Azevedo, M.S.; Nehring, P.; Gonzaga, L.V.; Fett, R.; Costa, A.C.O. Effect of in vitro gastrointestinal digestion on the bioaccessibility of phenolic compounds, minerals, and antioxidant capacity of Mimosa scabrella Bentham honeydew honeys. Food Res. Int. 2017, 99(1), 670–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gayoso, L.; Claerbout, A.-S.; Calvo, M.I.; Cavero, R.Y.; Astiasarán, I.; Ansorena, D. Bioaccessibility of rutin, caffeic acid and rosmarinic acid: Influence of the in vitro gastrointestinal digestion models. J. Funct. Foods 2016, 26, 428–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Romano, A.; di Luccia, A.; Romano, R.; Sarghini, F.; Masi, P. Microscopic and thermal characteristics of experimental models of starch, gliadins, glutenins and gluten from semolina. 12th International Conference on Chemical and Process Engineering (ICheaP) 2015, 43, 163–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, H.; Wang, C.; Guo, T.; Xie, Y.; Feng, W.; Li, S. Starch composition and its granules distribution in wheat grains in relation to post-anthesis high temperature and drought stress treatments. Starch/Starke 2014, 66, 419–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geera, B.P.; Nelson, J.E.; Souza, E.; Huber, K.C. Composition properties of A- B-type starch granules of wild-type, partial waxy, waxy soft wheat. Cereal Chem. 2006, 83, 551–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gallo, V.; Romano, A.; Masi, P. Does the presence of fibres affect the microstructure and in vitro starch digestibility of commercial Italian pasta? Food Struct. 2020, 24, 100139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]








| Sample Type | Semolina (g) | Enrichment Flour (g) | Salt | Water (mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control T1 – T4 | 2000 (S1 – S4) | 0 | Yes | 400 |
| Sorghum-Enriched TSF | 1980 (S2 Kenza) | 20 (1%) | Yes | 450 |
| Cork Oak-Enriched TCF | 1920 (S2 Kenza) | 80 (4%) | Yes | 600 |
| Sample | Moisture (%) | Protein (%) | Fat (%) | Ash (%) | Fiber (%) | Digestible Carbohydrates (%) | Energy (kJ) | Energy (kcal) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | 11.56 | 12.02 | 1.44 | 0.77 | 5.70 | 68.51 | 1468 | 346 |
| S2 | 11.95 | 13.07 | 1.52 | 0.82 | 5.97 | 66.67 | 1460 | 345 |
| S3 | 11.07 | 12.83 | 1.48 | 0.74 | 5.96 | 67.92 | 1475 | 348 |
| S4 | 11.09 | 12.25 | 1.83 | 0.83 | 6.19 | 67.81 | 1478 | 349 |
| SF | 8.96 | 8.42 | 3.17 | 2.69 | 28.27 | 48.49 | 1311 | 313 |
| CF | 9.60 | 4.33 | 8.69 | 1.90 | 30.07 | 45.41 | 1408 | 337 |
| Sample | Length (mm) | Width (mm) | Thickness (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 13.31 ± 1.60 | 13.25 ± 1.75 | 0.81 ± 0.14 |
| T2 | 13.50 ± 2.00 | 12.81 ± 1.96 | 0.75 ± 0.07 |
| T3 | 13.45 ± 1.45 | 12.95 ± 1.95 | 0.66 ± 0.14 |
| T4 | 14.00 ± 1.00 | 13.25 ± 1.25 | 0.67 ± 0.13 |
| TSF | 13.90 ± 1.40 | 13.36 ± 1.83 | 0.63 ± 0.12 |
| TCF | 14.35 ± 1.15 | 13.85 ± 1.35 | 0.75 ± 0.03 |
| Sample | Moisture content (%) | WAI (%) | WSI (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 10.887 ± 0.014 | 1.60 ± 0.02 | 6.23 ± 0.16 |
| T2 | 11.468 ± 0.004 | 1.57 ± 0.02 | 6.38 ± 0.45 |
| T3 | 11.203 ± 0.015 | 1.60 ± 0.01 | 6.62 ± 0.38 |
| T4 | 11.239 ± 0.021 | 1.61 ± 0.03 | 5.81 ± 0.33 |
| TSF | 10.905 ± 0.039 | 1.54 ± 0.01 | 10.19 ± 5.13 |
| TCF | 11.179 ± 0.002 | 1.57 ± 0.01 | 7.33 ± 0.22 |
| Sample | L* | a* | b* | ΔE |
| T1 | 59.95 ± 0.8 | 1.17 ± 0.3 | 10.45 ± 0.7 | ref |
| T2 | 61.14 ± 0.7 | 1.02 ± 0.4 | 9.65 ± 0.6 | 1.44 |
| T3 | 60.33 ± 0.6 | 0.82 ± 0.3 | 9.20 ± 0.5 | 1.35 |
| T4 | 61.42 ± 0.7 | 0.85 ± 0.4 | 10.64 ± 0.6 | 1.52 |
| TSF | 57.74 ± 0.9 | 1.25 ± 0.5 | 7.48 ± 0.7 | 3.70 |
| TCF | 46.20 ± 1.0 | 4.71 ± 0.6 | 10.59 ± 0.8 | 14.20 |
| Sample | MCT (min) | WAC (%) | CL (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 2.00 ± 0.01 | 241.99 ± 0.86 | 7.85 ± 0.03 |
| T2 | 2.00 ± 0.01 | 253.69 ± 1.08 | 7.90 ± 0.02 |
| T3 | 2.00 ± 0.02 | 233.04 ± 0.57 | 7.58 ± 0.03 |
| T4 | 1.30 ± 0.01 | 299.82 ± 0.12 | 8.08 ± 0.04 |
| TSF | 2.15 ± 0.17 | 236.88 ± 1.05 | 7.70 ± 0.02 |
| TCF | 2.30 ± 0.05 | 214.33 ± 1.23 | 7.58 ± 0.03 |
| Sample | Hardness (N) |
Adhesiveness (mJ) | Cohesiveness (-) | Gumminess (N) | Springiness (-) |
Chewiness (N·mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 208.50 ± 5.50 | 20.11 ± 2.67 | 11.24 ± 1.27 | 30.66 ± 1.20 | 0.27 ± 0.01 | 8.02 ± 0.21 |
| T2 | 243.50 ± 6.50 | 19.39 ± 3.04 | 9.49 ± 3.31 | 46.04 ± 2.13 | 0.33 ± 0.01 | 15.21 ± 0.94 |
| T3 | 219.50 ± 25.5 | 18.35 ± 4.78 | 8.75 ± 2.35 | 35.35 ± 5.94 | 0.36 ± 0.02 | 12.61 ± 1.61 |
| T4 | 166.50 ± 4.50 | 14.77 ± 2.51 | 9.44 ± 1.17 | 20.71 ± 2.21 | 0.27 ± 0.01 | 5.64 ± 0.41 |
| TSF | 191.50 ± 2.50 | 14.17 ± 0.95 | 7.88 ± 1.02 | 33.24 ± 1.33 | 0.29 ± 0.02 | 9.52 ± 0.97 |
| TCF | 276.00 ± 29.00 | 22.17 ± 4.21 | 13.59 ± 3.61 | 54.84 ± 4.63 | 0.35 ± 0.02 | 18.85 ± 0.69 |
| Formula | [M+H]+ | [M+Na]+ | [M-H]- | Fragments | Compounds | Rf (min) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C10H8O4 | - | - | 191.0379 | 176.0186; 148.0234 124.0461 |
Scopoletin | 4.971 |
| C6H12O3 | 131.0718 | 129.0567; 113.0564 | Hydroxycaproic acid | 5.209 | ||
| C9H10O3 | - | - | 165.0559 | 147.0444; 119.0498; 103.0561 | 2-Hydroxy-3-phenylpropanoic acid (3-Phenyllactic acid) | 8.225 |
| C16H12O6 | - | - | 299.0597 | 165.0226; 133.0273 | Luteolin methyl ether (7or5) | 15.184 |
| C10H8O4 | - | - | 191.0361 | 176.0124; 148.0210 | Scopoletin isomer | 16.255 |
| C15H12O6 | - | - | 287.0606 | 151.0058; 135.0462 107.0156 |
Eriodictyol | 18.969 |
| C15H10O6 | - | - | 285.0415 | 151.0013; 133.0292; 107.0148 |
Luteolin | 20.345 |
| C15H12O5 | - | - | 271.0644 | 177.0259; 151.0031; 119.0519 |
Naringenin | 22.301 |
| Formula | [M+H]+ | [M+Na]+ | [M-H]- | Fragments | Compound | Rf [min] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C7H12O6 | 191.0563 | 173.0521; 127.0490 | Quinic acid | 1.905 | ||
| C7H6O5 | 169.0145 | 125.0237 | Gallic acid | 2.334 | ||
| C6H8O7 | 191.0207 | 111.0125 | Citric acid | 2.714 | ||
| C9H10O5 | - | - | 197.0470 | 169.0125; 125.0228 | Ethyl Gallate | 7.457 |
| C15H20O10 | 335.0431 | 183.0329 | Digallic acid methyl | 12.530 | ||
| C8H8O5 | 183.0228 | 168.0004; 124.0130 | Methyl Gallate | 4.000 | ||
| C14H6O8 | 301.0008 | 145.0276 | Ellagic acid | 14.502 |
| Sample | TPC Content (mg GAE/mL extract) |
RSD (%) | TFC Content (mg RA/mL extract) |
RSD (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | 0.099 | 4.349 | 0.299 | 4.290 |
| S2 | 0.123 | 1.132 | 0.328 | 3.569 |
| S3 | 0.105 | 2.225 | 0.417 | 6.537 |
| S4 | 0.118 | 1.458 | 0.581 | 8.876 |
| SF | 1.048 | 5.314 | 0.947 | 3.298 |
| CF | 1.715 | 2.918 | 1.615 | 0.189 |
| TSF | 0.299 | 4.912 | 0.254 | 4.491 |
| TCF | 0.314 | 4.715 | 0.299 | 0.122 |
| Sample | RSA after 10 min (%) | RSD (%) | RSA after 20 min (%) | RSD (%) | RSA after 30 min (%) | RSD (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | 24.87 | 4.521 | 28.27 | 1.864 | 30.19 | 0.249 |
| S2 | 27.53 | 3.001 | 31.68 | 2.139 | 34.40 | 0.437 |
| S3 | 22.11 | 4.539 | 25.66 | 4.213 | 27.89 | 4.151 |
| S4 | 31.44 | 3.437 | 36.90 | 2.928 | 40.17 | 3.074 |
| SF | 77.84 | 0.644 | 78.45 | 0.639 | 78.65 | 0.638 |
| CF | 91.10 | 0.424 | 91.32 | 0.591 | 91.43 | 0.593 |
| TSF | 45.60 | 0.641 | 51.19 | 0.857 | 53.10 | 0.932 |
| TCF | 54.41 | 1.186 | 61.71 | 1.511 | 64.15 | 1.453 |
| Activity in relation to semolina | SF | TSF | CF | TCF | S1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| after 0 min | 1.860 | 1.362 | 2.789 | 1.564 | 1.000 |
| after 10 min | 1.867 | 1.371 | 2.883 | 1.566 | 1.000 |
| after 30 min | 1.857 | 1.372 | 2.887 | 1.569 | 1.000 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, inst m any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).