Figure 1.
Graphic representation of IFN-τ sequence and homology modelling. (A) Alignment of the coiled IFN-τ (Target: G3MZ51 · G3MZ51_BOVIN from UniProt) and the Template A0A7R8C394.1.A. (B) The best model obtained from the Homology Modelling and Docking Experiment. (C) Represents the best poses of α/β-Receptor-1 (blue) with interferon tau. (D) Represents the best poses of α/β-Receptor-2 (blue) with IFN-τ.
Figure 1.
Graphic representation of IFN-τ sequence and homology modelling. (A) Alignment of the coiled IFN-τ (Target: G3MZ51 · G3MZ51_BOVIN from UniProt) and the Template A0A7R8C394.1.A. (B) The best model obtained from the Homology Modelling and Docking Experiment. (C) Represents the best poses of α/β-Receptor-1 (blue) with interferon tau. (D) Represents the best poses of α/β-Receptor-2 (blue) with IFN-τ.
Figure 2.
Interaction between IFN-τ and receptors. (A) Graphical representation of the main interactions between IFN-τ and α/β-Receptor-1. (B) Graphical representation of the main interactions between IFN-τ and α/β-Receptor-2. The amino acids of α/β-Receptor-1 and 2 are shown in dark blue.
Figure 2.
Interaction between IFN-τ and receptors. (A) Graphical representation of the main interactions between IFN-τ and α/β-Receptor-1. (B) Graphical representation of the main interactions between IFN-τ and α/β-Receptor-2. The amino acids of α/β-Receptor-1 and 2 are shown in dark blue.
Figure 3.
Evaluation of brIFN-τ expression in Pichia pastoris. (A) SDS-PAGE (right) and Western blot (left) of the Pichia pastoris culture supernatant collected 72 hours post-induction. Samples are labeled as follows: 1: Strategy 1, 2: Strategy 2, 3: Strategy 3, 4: Strategy 4, 5: Strategy 5, C-: Negative Control, S: Sample. The arrows indicate the bands corresponding to recombinant bovine IFN-τ. (B) SDS-PAGE gel was used for quantifying brIFN-τ from the Pichia pastoris culture supernatant and collected 72 hours post-induction. Lanes 1-5 represent culture supernatants from strategies 1-5. A BSA standard curve (μg) was used: 125, 250, 500, 750, and 1000 μg. MW: Molecular Weight markers (kDa). (C) Increasing the culture incubation time to 120 hours in shaken flasks. This section includes an SDS-PAGE (right) and Western blot (left) of the culture supernatant using Induction Strategy 3 at various time points (0h - 120h). (D) SDS-PAGE (right) and Western blot (left) using Strategy 4 at various time points (0h - 120h). (E) brIFN-τ expression curve plotted as a function of time and optical density (OD) for Strategies 3 and 4.
Figure 3.
Evaluation of brIFN-τ expression in Pichia pastoris. (A) SDS-PAGE (right) and Western blot (left) of the Pichia pastoris culture supernatant collected 72 hours post-induction. Samples are labeled as follows: 1: Strategy 1, 2: Strategy 2, 3: Strategy 3, 4: Strategy 4, 5: Strategy 5, C-: Negative Control, S: Sample. The arrows indicate the bands corresponding to recombinant bovine IFN-τ. (B) SDS-PAGE gel was used for quantifying brIFN-τ from the Pichia pastoris culture supernatant and collected 72 hours post-induction. Lanes 1-5 represent culture supernatants from strategies 1-5. A BSA standard curve (μg) was used: 125, 250, 500, 750, and 1000 μg. MW: Molecular Weight markers (kDa). (C) Increasing the culture incubation time to 120 hours in shaken flasks. This section includes an SDS-PAGE (right) and Western blot (left) of the culture supernatant using Induction Strategy 3 at various time points (0h - 120h). (D) SDS-PAGE (right) and Western blot (left) using Strategy 4 at various time points (0h - 120h). (E) brIFN-τ expression curve plotted as a function of time and optical density (OD) for Strategies 3 and 4.

Figure 4.
Evaluation of brIFN-τ purification. (A) Chromatogram from cationic exchange. (B) Chromatogram from anionic exchange. MW: molecular weight, CIEX: cation exchange chromatography, AIEX: anion exchange chromatography, IS: initial sample, UN: unbound proteins to the column, E1: first elution, E2: second elution, E3: third elution fraction. The NaCl gradient used to elute the protein fractions is represented in the graph by a dashed line. (C) SDS-PAGE gel (right) and Western blot (left) of fractions obtained from cationic exchange (S) and anionic exchange (Q) purification.
Figure 4.
Evaluation of brIFN-τ purification. (A) Chromatogram from cationic exchange. (B) Chromatogram from anionic exchange. MW: molecular weight, CIEX: cation exchange chromatography, AIEX: anion exchange chromatography, IS: initial sample, UN: unbound proteins to the column, E1: first elution, E2: second elution, E3: third elution fraction. The NaCl gradient used to elute the protein fractions is represented in the graph by a dashed line. (C) SDS-PAGE gel (right) and Western blot (left) of fractions obtained from cationic exchange (S) and anionic exchange (Q) purification.
Figure 5.
Evaluation of the antiviral activity of brIFN-τ. (
A) Percentage of cell viability in inhibiting the cytopathic effect of the Mengo virus in MDBK cells. (
B) Antiviral activity of brIFN-τ, with IFNα-2b used as a standard for comparison. (
C) Titers of brIFN-τ and specific activity of the standard. (
D) As determined by qPCR, relative expression levels of PKR, OAS1, and OAS2. Data were normalized using the Pfaffl method[
53,
54] with β-actin as the housekeeping gene. Data were statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and Dunnett's post-test (***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05).
Figure 5.
Evaluation of the antiviral activity of brIFN-τ. (
A) Percentage of cell viability in inhibiting the cytopathic effect of the Mengo virus in MDBK cells. (
B) Antiviral activity of brIFN-τ, with IFNα-2b used as a standard for comparison. (
C) Titers of brIFN-τ and specific activity of the standard. (
D) As determined by qPCR, relative expression levels of PKR, OAS1, and OAS2. Data were normalized using the Pfaffl method[
53,
54] with β-actin as the housekeeping gene. Data were statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and Dunnett's post-test (***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05).
Figure 6.
Microparticles characterization, viability and brIFN-τ release. Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) photomicrographs of microparticles generated at different temperatures are presented (A-F). The empty control particles, which do not contain brIFN-τ, were produced at temperatures of 100°C (A), 120°C (C), and 140°C (E). In contrast, brIFN-τ associated chitosan particles were generated at the same temperatures: 100°C (B), 120°C (D), and 140°C (F). The viability percentage was assessed by measuring the inhibition of the cytopathic effect of the Mengo virus in MDBK cells (G). A Western blot analysis of microparticle release samples was conducted at 100°C, 120°C, and 140°C (H). The PPM serves as a molecular weight standard, and lanes 1 to 3 correspond to the release supernatants of particle samples generated at 100°C, 120°C, and 140°C, respectively, after 48 hours of release in a 10 mM citrate solution at pH 6.5 and 37°C. Lanes 4 to 6 represent the release samples of empty microparticles generated at 100°C, 120°C, and 140°C, respectively. Lane 7 shows the brIFN-τ used as a control (20 µg). A polyclonal antibody from Santa Cruz (Fermelo) was utilized in the experiment, and the reaction was visualized using the Alexa 680 rabbit anti-IgG secondary antibody.
Figure 6.
Microparticles characterization, viability and brIFN-τ release. Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) photomicrographs of microparticles generated at different temperatures are presented (A-F). The empty control particles, which do not contain brIFN-τ, were produced at temperatures of 100°C (A), 120°C (C), and 140°C (E). In contrast, brIFN-τ associated chitosan particles were generated at the same temperatures: 100°C (B), 120°C (D), and 140°C (F). The viability percentage was assessed by measuring the inhibition of the cytopathic effect of the Mengo virus in MDBK cells (G). A Western blot analysis of microparticle release samples was conducted at 100°C, 120°C, and 140°C (H). The PPM serves as a molecular weight standard, and lanes 1 to 3 correspond to the release supernatants of particle samples generated at 100°C, 120°C, and 140°C, respectively, after 48 hours of release in a 10 mM citrate solution at pH 6.5 and 37°C. Lanes 4 to 6 represent the release samples of empty microparticles generated at 100°C, 120°C, and 140°C, respectively. Lane 7 shows the brIFN-τ used as a control (20 µg). A polyclonal antibody from Santa Cruz (Fermelo) was utilized in the experiment, and the reaction was visualized using the Alexa 680 rabbit anti-IgG secondary antibody.

Figure 7.
Graphical representation of the daily release of brIFN-τ from microparticles generated at 120°C. (A) Total protein quantification from the released samples daily in the resuspension buffer (50 mM citrate buffer, pH 6.8) was performed using the micro-BCA™ Protein Assay Kit. (B) A Western blot analysis was conducted to determine the release of brIFN-τ from chitosan microparticles. The lanes represent the days supernatant samples containing brIFN-τ were extracted. A polyclonal anti-IFN-τ antibody produced in rabbits (Santa Cruz) was utilized, and the reaction was visualized using a secondary antibody, anti-rabbit IgG Alexa 680. The Li-COR Biosciences Odyssey scanner system, along with Image Studio Lite version 5.2 analysis software, was used for visualization and analysis.
Figure 7.
Graphical representation of the daily release of brIFN-τ from microparticles generated at 120°C. (A) Total protein quantification from the released samples daily in the resuspension buffer (50 mM citrate buffer, pH 6.8) was performed using the micro-BCA™ Protein Assay Kit. (B) A Western blot analysis was conducted to determine the release of brIFN-τ from chitosan microparticles. The lanes represent the days supernatant samples containing brIFN-τ were extracted. A polyclonal anti-IFN-τ antibody produced in rabbits (Santa Cruz) was utilized, and the reaction was visualized using a secondary antibody, anti-rabbit IgG Alexa 680. The Li-COR Biosciences Odyssey scanner system, along with Image Studio Lite version 5.2 analysis software, was used for visualization and analysis.
Figure 8.
Scheme of hydrogel generation.
Figure 8.
Scheme of hydrogel generation.
Figure 9.
Hydrogel characterization and brIFN-τ release assay. Photomicrographs were taken using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) of the hydrogel samples. (A) Hydrogel mixed with an equivalent of 2 mg of brIFN-τ microencapsulated. (B) Hydrogel mixed with 2 mg of non-microencapsulated soluble brIFN-τ. (C) Hydrogel mixed with empty microparticles. All microparticles were prepared at 120°C. The brIFN-τ, both microencapsulated and soluble, was added on day 2 of the hydrogel elution scheme, immediately after adding genipin. (D) Viability percentage was determined by measuring the inhibition of the cytopathic effect of the Mengo virus assay in MDBK cells using samples released 48 hours after each sample preparation. (E) A graphical representation illustrates the daily release of hydrogel mixed with brIFN-τ microencapsulated over a period of 26 days. Total protein quantification was achieved using the Micro BCA™ Protein Assay Kit. The x-axis corresponds to the day of sampling. (F) This section represents the antiviral effect of brIFN-τ in MDBK cell cultures using ½ dilutions. The samples of hydrogel containing brIFN-τ microencapsulated were utilized for this assay. Results were compared to a negative control of dead cells. Data were statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and Dunnett's post-test (***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05).
Figure 9.
Hydrogel characterization and brIFN-τ release assay. Photomicrographs were taken using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) of the hydrogel samples. (A) Hydrogel mixed with an equivalent of 2 mg of brIFN-τ microencapsulated. (B) Hydrogel mixed with 2 mg of non-microencapsulated soluble brIFN-τ. (C) Hydrogel mixed with empty microparticles. All microparticles were prepared at 120°C. The brIFN-τ, both microencapsulated and soluble, was added on day 2 of the hydrogel elution scheme, immediately after adding genipin. (D) Viability percentage was determined by measuring the inhibition of the cytopathic effect of the Mengo virus assay in MDBK cells using samples released 48 hours after each sample preparation. (E) A graphical representation illustrates the daily release of hydrogel mixed with brIFN-τ microencapsulated over a period of 26 days. Total protein quantification was achieved using the Micro BCA™ Protein Assay Kit. The x-axis corresponds to the day of sampling. (F) This section represents the antiviral effect of brIFN-τ in MDBK cell cultures using ½ dilutions. The samples of hydrogel containing brIFN-τ microencapsulated were utilized for this assay. Results were compared to a negative control of dead cells. Data were statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and Dunnett's post-test (***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05).

Figure 10.
Drug safety evaluation in the ovine model. (A) Schema of the Ovine Assay. (B) External evaluation of genitalia in the ewes of the study at time 0. Oedema and mucosal secretion (yellow arrow). (C) Vulvar edema and erythematous mucosa are due to an oestrum. (D) Evolution of the rectal temperature in ewes treated with brIFN-τ microencapsulated in hydrogel (brIFN-τ micro/hydrogel) v/s the control group (Micro/hydrogel w/o brIFN-τ). (F) Variation of the vulvar temperature in ewes was treated in the same way. D. Results were compared concerning the negative control of dead cells. No significant differences were registered between the groups.
Figure 10.
Drug safety evaluation in the ovine model. (A) Schema of the Ovine Assay. (B) External evaluation of genitalia in the ewes of the study at time 0. Oedema and mucosal secretion (yellow arrow). (C) Vulvar edema and erythematous mucosa are due to an oestrum. (D) Evolution of the rectal temperature in ewes treated with brIFN-τ microencapsulated in hydrogel (brIFN-τ micro/hydrogel) v/s the control group (Micro/hydrogel w/o brIFN-τ). (F) Variation of the vulvar temperature in ewes was treated in the same way. D. Results were compared concerning the negative control of dead cells. No significant differences were registered between the groups.
Figure 11.
Anti-luteolytic activity and serum progesterone levels after brIFN-τ delivery via hydrogel in cattle. (A) Scheme of progesterone assay in cows. (B) Transrectal ultrasound evaluation of cows from groups 1, which uses microparticles/hydrogel without brIFN-τ, 2 (brIFN-τ microencapsulated with hydrogel), and 3 (non-encapsulated brIFN-τ plus, hydrogel). Visible implant in uterine horn (red arrow); uterine horn (green circle); anechoic center of the uterine horn, indicating the absence of solid contents (green arrow). Ultrasonograph Mindray®, DP50-Vet, linear probe 8,5 MHz. (C) Mold used to generate semi-solid matrix (hydrogel) and hydrogel examples. (D) Progesterone (P4) levels in the three groups: control, brIFN-τ micro/hydrogel, and brIFN-τ hydrogel (nonencapsulated). The levels of P4 on day 19 stand out, with significant differences between brIFN-τ micro/hydrogel concerning the control group.
Figure 11.
Anti-luteolytic activity and serum progesterone levels after brIFN-τ delivery via hydrogel in cattle. (A) Scheme of progesterone assay in cows. (B) Transrectal ultrasound evaluation of cows from groups 1, which uses microparticles/hydrogel without brIFN-τ, 2 (brIFN-τ microencapsulated with hydrogel), and 3 (non-encapsulated brIFN-τ plus, hydrogel). Visible implant in uterine horn (red arrow); uterine horn (green circle); anechoic center of the uterine horn, indicating the absence of solid contents (green arrow). Ultrasonograph Mindray®, DP50-Vet, linear probe 8,5 MHz. (C) Mold used to generate semi-solid matrix (hydrogel) and hydrogel examples. (D) Progesterone (P4) levels in the three groups: control, brIFN-τ micro/hydrogel, and brIFN-τ hydrogel (nonencapsulated). The levels of P4 on day 19 stand out, with significant differences between brIFN-τ micro/hydrogel concerning the control group.
Table 1.
Methanol concentration per induction strategy over time.
Table 1.
Methanol concentration per induction strategy over time.
| Strategy |
0h |
24h |
48h |
| 1 |
0.3 % |
0.4 % |
0.5 % |
| 2 |
0.5 % |
0.75 % |
1 % |
| 3 |
0.5 % |
1 % |
1.5 % |
| 4 |
0.5 % |
1 % |
1 % |
| 5 |
1 % |
1 % |
1 % |
Table 2.
Optimal strategies of methanol concentration.
Table 2.
Optimal strategies of methanol concentration.
| Strategy |
0h |
|
24h |
48h |
72h |
96h |
| 3 |
0.5 % |
|
1 % |
1.5 % |
1.5 % |
1.5 % |
| 4 |
0.5 % |
|
1 % |
1 % |
1 % |
1 % |
Table 3.
Microencapsulation of chitosan control and chitosan/ brIFN-t mixture. Spray drying in the mini–Spray Dryer b-290 of the vacuum chitosan samples at different temperatures, keeping constant feed, aspiration, and airflow.
Table 3.
Microencapsulation of chitosan control and chitosan/ brIFN-t mixture. Spray drying in the mini–Spray Dryer b-290 of the vacuum chitosan samples at different temperatures, keeping constant feed, aspiration, and airflow.
| Inlet temperature (°C) |
Inlet temperature (°C) |
Aspiration (%) |
Feed Flow rate (mL/min) |
Air Flow rate (L/h) |
| 100 |
63 |
95 |
6.0 |
536 |
| 120 |
76 |
95 |
6.0 |
536 |
| 140 |
88 |
95 |
6.0 |
536 |
Table 4.
Template search results for building the IFN-τ model.
Table 4.
Template search results for building the IFN-τ model.
| Template |
Seq Identity (%) |
Found by |
Method |
Seq Similarity |
Coverage |
Description |
| A0A7R8C394.1.A |
100.00 |
AFDB |
AlphaFold v2 |
0.61 |
0.98 |
Interferon 1BE10 |
| 1b5l.1.A |
68.82 |
BLAST |
X-ray |
0.50 |
0.87 |
Interferon Tau |
| 1b5l.1.A |
68.64 |
HHblits |
X-ray |
0.50 |
0.87 |
Interferon tau |
| 3oq3.1.A |
53.61 |
HHblits |
X-ray |
0.45 |
0.85 |
Interferon alpha-5 |
| 3se4.1.B |
66.08 |
HHblits |
X-ray |
0.50 |
0.88 |
Interferon omega-1 |
| 3se4.1.B |
66.07 |
BLAST |
X-ray |
0.50 |
0.86 |
Interferon omega-1 |
| 3oq3.1.A |
54.94 |
BLAST |
X-ray |
0.45 |
0.83 |
Interferon alpha-5 |
| 2kz1.1.A |
56.10 |
HHblits |
NMR |
0.46 |
0.84 |
Interferon alpha-2 |
| 7e0e.1.A |
50.30 |
HHblits |
X-ray |
0.43 |
0.86 |
Interferon alpha-2 |
| 7e0e.1.A |
51.85 |
BLAST |
X-ray |
0.44 |
0.83 |
Interferon alpha-2 |
| 2lag.1.B |
56.10 |
HHblits |
NMR |
0.46 |
0.84 |
Interferon alpha-2 |
| 4z5r.1.A |
56.10 |
HHblits |
X-ray |
0.46 |
0.84 |
Interferon alpha-2 |
| 1itf.1.A |
56.10 |
HHblits |
NMR |
0.46 |
0.84 |
Interferon Alpha-2a |
| 2hym.1.B |
56.10 |
HHblits |
NMR |
0.46 |
0.84 |
Interferon alpha-2 |
| 3ux9.1.A |
57.67 |
BLAST |
X-ray |
0.46 |
0.84 |
Interferon alpha-1/13 |
| 1au1.1.A |
34.15 |
HHblits |
X-ray |
0.36 |
0.84 |
Interferon-Beta |
| 3ux9.1.A |
56.63 |
HHblits |
X-ray |
0.45 |
0.85 |
Interferon alpha-1/13 |
| 3se3.1.B |
54.55 |
HHblits |
X-ray |
0.45 |
0.85 |
Interferon alpha 2b |
| 3s9d.1.A |
54.55 |
HHblits |
X-ray |
0.45 |
0.85 |
Interferon alpha-2 |
| 1au1.1.B |
34.15 |
HHblits |
X-ray |
0.36 |
0.84 |
Interferon-Beta |
| 2lms.1.A |
55.76 |
HHblits |
NMR |
0.45 |
0.85 |
Interferon alpha-2 |
| 6jhd.1.A |
56.36 |
HHblits |
NMR |
0.45 |
0.85 |
Interferon alpha-8 |
| 6jhd.1.A |
57.06 |
BLAST |
NMR |
0.45 |
0.84 |
Interferon alpha-8 |
| 1au1.1.A |
37.50 |
BLAST |
X-ray |
0.39 |
0.70 |
Interferon-beta |
| 1au1.1.B |
37.50 |
BLAST |
X-ray |
0.39 |
0.70 |
Interferon-beta |
Table 5.
Docking and confidence scores of top five IFN-τ–α/β receptor complex poses predicted by HDOCK.
Table 5.
Docking and confidence scores of top five IFN-τ–α/β receptor complex poses predicted by HDOCK.
| Poses |
IFN-τ-α/β-Receptor-1 |
IFN-τ-α/β-Receptor-2 |
| Docking Score |
Confidence Score |
Docking Score |
Confidence Score |
| Pose-1 |
-259.84 |
0.9000 |
-271.82 |
0.9196 |
| Pose-2 |
-249.51 |
0.8798 |
-270.79 |
0.9180 |
| Pose-3 |
-240.63 |
0.8597 |
-266.38 |
0.9111 |
| Pose-4 |
-238.00 |
0.8532 |
-256.82 |
0.8944 |
| Pose-5 |
-236.13 |
0.8485 |
-251.72 |
0.8844 |
Table 6.
Chitosan/brIFN-τ encapsulation performance at varying temperatures under constant feed, suction, and airflow.
Table 6.
Chitosan/brIFN-τ encapsulation performance at varying temperatures under constant feed, suction, and airflow.
| Sample |
Mass (g) |
Yield (%) |
| 100 °C |
0.96 |
56.1 |
| 120 °C |
1.14 |
66.1 |
| 140 °C |
1.16 |
67.8 |
Table 7.
Performance of empty chitosan encapsulation at varying temperatures with constant feed, suction, and airflow.
Table 7.
Performance of empty chitosan encapsulation at varying temperatures with constant feed, suction, and airflow.
| Sample |
Mass (g) |
Yield (%) |
| 100 °C |
0.96 |
56.1 |
| 120 °C |
1.14 |
66.1 |
| 140 °C |
1.16 |
67.8 |
Table 8.
Hemogram results in sheep on days 0, 3, 7, and 14 of safety trial.
Table 8.
Hemogram results in sheep on days 0, 3, 7, and 14 of safety trial.
| |
Hematocrit |
Total Leukocytes |
| Group |
ID |
Day 0 |
Day 3 |
Day 7 |
Day 14 |
Day 0 |
Day 3 |
Day 7 |
Day 14 |
| Control Group |
32 |
9.39 |
9.2 |
8.9 |
9.49 |
9400 |
7500 |
6000 |
5910 |
| 33 |
10.6 |
11.1 |
11.57 |
11.38 |
5940 |
6500 |
8700 |
11900 |
| 36 |
10.34 |
10.2 |
10.14 |
9.84 |
6340 |
11000 |
16450 |
7600 |
| 34 |
10.18 |
10.6 |
9.77 |
10.93 |
6700 |
10900 |
11670 |
11800 |
| 42 |
10.28 |
11.3 |
11.97 |
11.66 |
6000 |
6900 |
7920 |
7420 |
| Treated Group |
27 |
8.39 |
8.6 |
8.58 |
8.85 |
5300 |
7200 |
8670 |
6880 |
| 30 |
9.17 |
10.1 |
10.29 |
9.95 |
4000 |
4300 |
5300 |
5000 |
| 48 |
9.17 |
9.9 |
10.41 |
9.61 |
4000 |
5400 |
6340 |
4420 |
| 71 |
11.21 |
12.2 |
12.28 |
11.79 |
10460 |
10800 |
11510 |
11800 |
| 483 |
8.91 |
9.3 |
9.59 |
9 |
8110 |
9500 |
9710 |
7310 |