Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Floristic Diversity and Structure of Historical Rubber Plantations (Hevea brasiliensis Wild ex A. Juss) in Sankuru, DR Congo: Implications for Biodiversity Conservation

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

07 May 2025

Posted:

08 May 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
The rubber plantations in Sankuru province, located in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), have historically been pivotal to the regional economy. However, the absence of suitable silvicultural practices has promoted self-regeneration, resulting in the proliferation of diverse species. This study aims to characterize species richness and plant structure of these plantations. To this end, 80 plots measuring 0.25 hectares were meticulously established, with a proportionate division between state-owned and farmer plantations. The results obtained from this study indicate that these plantations are home to approximately 105 species, classified into 33 distinct botanical families, with dominant families such as Fabaceae, Meliaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Olacaceae, Clusiaceae, and Moraceae. Despite the similarity between the two types of plantations (Cs = 58%), significant disparities were observed in terms of individuals: 635 ± 84.06 and 828 ± 144.62 (p < 10-3), and species: 41 ± 7.49 and 28 ± 4.59 (p < 10-3), and families: 19±3.06 and 16±1.62 (p < 10-2), and basal area: 29.88 ± 5.8 and 41.37 ± 7.57 (p <10-2) for state and peasant plantations, respectively. State plantations exhibited greater diversity (H'=1.87) and enhanced equity (J'=0.43) than peasant plantations. The diametric structure exhibited an inverted J-shaped distribution, indicating constant and regular regeneration of these plantations. The upper canopy dominates the vertical structure in both types of plantations, with a significantly higher proportion in peasant plantations (83.60%) than in state plantations (73.8%), ANOVA test (p = 4.03e-⁶). The findings indicate that the sustainable management of these plantations could incorporate agroecological principles to promote the coexistence of rubber production and biodiversity conservation, while contributing to the restoration of degraded ecosystems and the well-being of local communities.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Rubber plantations (Hevea brasiliensis) play a significant role in tropical agriculture, particularly in Africa [1,2], where they are crucial for the production of latex, which serves as a vital source of income for numerous rural communities [3]. However, the research on these plantations has been predominantly focused on their economic profitability, often neglecting their ecological potential [4]. The transition from forests to rubber plantations has resulted in alterations in biodiversity, particularly in terms of floristic diversity [5,6]. This alteration in floristic diversity can be attributed to the management, inputs, and maintenance activities associated with rubber plantations [6]. It is imperative to acknowledge that how rubber plantations are developed and managed exerts a significant influence on the impact of rubber farming on floristic diversity [7].
A study by Lan et al. [7] on the Chinese island of Hainan demonstrated that rubber plantations with close-to-natural management, also known as "rubber forests," can harbour a floristic diversity similar to that of forests. Studies conducted in rubber plantations of this nature on the island of Java and in the Sumatra region of Indonesia, Vietnam, and Malaysia have found that "rubber forests" exhibit a biodiversity comparable to that of secondary forests [8,9].
In the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), thousands of hectares of abandoned rubber plantations, including some in the Lodja and Lomela territories of Sankuru Province [1,2,10]. Notably, the Lodja and Lomela territories in this province, situated in the central region of the country, are notable for their substantial rubber plantations, both industrial and village-based. The area once encompassed 7,000 hectares, but recent estimations place it at approximately 2,000 hectares [2]. Having lain fallow for a considerable duration, rubber plantations in Sankuru are presently being invaded by other forest species, thereby diversifying the flora accompanying the rubber tree [2]. The classification of rubber plantations in Sankuru depends on the ownership and management type. They can be categorised into four distinct classes: state-owned plantations managed by the National Institute for Agronomic Study and Research (INERA), industrial plantations managed by private companies, religious plantations owned by religious missions (notably Catholics), and peasant plantations owned by the local population [1]. Presently, the precise surface area of these historic rubber plantations and their contribution to the conservation of woody plant diversity remain poorly documented [2].
The pertinence of this research lies in its exploration of the historical rubber plantations of Sankuru within the paradigm of sustainable management of tropical ecosystems. While these plantations have exerted a profound socio-economic influence on the region, they have received scant attention for their floristic diversity and structural characteristics, particularly from the vantage point of ecological conservation [1,2,10]. Moreover, rubber plantations, often considered exclusively from an economic perspective, are infrequently studied regarding their contribution to biodiversity and ecosystem service management [1]. This study aims to address these research gaps by examining the ecological dynamics of rubber plantations, focusing on regions where management practices and silvicultural treatments have been restricted. While research has underscored the significance of agricultural plantations in ecosystem services [1,11,12], the nexus between the vegetation structure of rubber plantations and their role in biodiversity conservation remains to be extensively investigated. This dearth of knowledge hinders the integration of rubber plantations into broader strategies for sustainable natural resource management [1,13].
This study addresses these knowledge gaps by analysing the floristic diversity and structural characteristics of historic rubber plantations in Sankuru. The objective is to provide crucial information for effective, sustainable management and conservation. The aim was to establish a correlation between the interaction of rubber trees and their associated flora by validating the prevailing hypothesis that the absence of silvicultural treatments in these plantations fosters the proliferation of spontaneous species, which naturally disperse in these regions and coexist with rubber trees. Consequently, the abandonment of rubber plantations in Sankuru promotes the development of species other than rubber, thereby diversifying the floristic composition of the two types of plantations. Furthermore, as the two types of plantations have undergone different development and management histories, the floristic composition exhibits variation between them. Finally, the two types of plantations are distinguished by an inverted J-shaped diametric structure, which indicates effective natural regeneration dynamics. The study's objective is twofold: first, to underscore the capacity of these plantations to serve as effective biodiversity conservation areas; and second, to propose pragmatic recommendations for integrated ecosystem management, aiming to strike a balance between agricultural productivity and environmental preservation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The present study was carried out in the historical rubber plantations located in the Lodja and Lomela territories in Sankuru Province (Figure 1), a forest province of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). Geographically located at 3°21'27" S and 23°35'48" E, Sankuru Province comprises six territories, 42 sectors, 415 groupings, and 3,838 villages. The population of Sankuru is estimated at 3,952,756 [14]. Rubber plantations are predominantly situated along the Lodja-Lomela axis, encompassing three distinct zones [2]. The geographical area under consideration is located in the southern portion of the Cuvette Centrale of the Congo Basin, within the geographical boundaries of Salonga National Park. The region's topography is predominantly characterised by plateaus, with altitudes ranging from 300 to 700 meters. As previously documented, the region's soils are predominantly sandy or sandy clay [14]. The climate of Sankuru Province is bimodal, with two seasons that occur at approximately the same time in different territories: a rainy season from mid-August to mid-May and a sub-dry season from mid-May to mid-August. Notably, the province's northern region experiences the most substantial rainfall during December and from mid-April to mid-May [15].

2.2. Data Collection

2.2.1. Inventory Method

The statistical inventory method was employed for the present study, given the size and typology of the rubber plantations in Sankuru. The objective of this inventory was to ascertain the woody potential in the plots in the two territories of Lodja and Lomela. Two distinct categories of plantations were considered: state-owned and farmer plantations. State plantations are those managed by INERA at Mukumari (150 km from Lodja). The peasant plantations are the Endjondjo, Etakamela, Loketo, Shenga, and Tsheko plantations (scattered throughout the Lomela territory) managed by local communities. The rationale behind this distinction is rooted in the observed disparities in management practices and economic interests between these two distinct categories of plantations within the region [1].

2.2.2. Experimental Design, Sampling, and Botanical Inventory

To characterise floristic diversity in the historical plantations of the two territories of Lodja and Lomela (Table 1), a floristic inventory campaign was carried out over five months from September 2023 to January 2024. The adopted system consisted of one-hectare (1 ha) plots subdivided into four 2,500-square-meter (50-meter × 50-meter) sub-plots, resulting in an inventory area of 0.25 ha. These sub-plots were arranged in two L-shaped layouts within each plantation, which was selected for an inventory of tree flora [16,17]. In the 0.25-hectare plots, all plant species encountered were identified, and individuals of tree species with a diameter at breast height (DBH) equal to or greater than 10 centimetres were numbered, identified, and counted [16,17], enabling basal area (G) to be calculated [16]. The selection of the 0.25-hectare plots was guided by the study's primary objectives: characterising the floristic diversity and structural characteristics of historical rubber plantations. The total height of each tree was measured, to the nearest dm, using the Vertex V (Haglof Sweden®).
For species not identified in the field, samples were collected for subsequent analysis in a herbarium. The species were identified and verified at the herbarium of the National Institute for Agronomic Study and Research of Yangambi (INERA/Yangambi). Subsequently, a comprehensive list of the reported plant species was meticulously compiled. The families and genera of the various species have been thoroughly researched and corrected according to the APG IV classification system. The nomenclature employed in this study aligns with that of APG IV [18], accessed at https://africanplantdatabase.ch. Taxonomic correction and family determination were carried out using the successive "get Taxonomy" and "TNRS" functions in the BIOMASS package of the R software [19].
In addition, Hawthorne's work Lisingo [17], Beina [20], Hamiliton [21], Senterre [22], Tchouto [23] and Nshimba [24] was used as a reference to group species according to their temperament: shade-tolerant or "shade-bearer" species (T); semi-tolerant or "non-pioneer light demanding" species (NP), which can tolerate some shade in their early life but cannot grow without progressive light; and strict heliophilous or "pioneer" species (P), which require the permanent presence of light for seed germination and the development of individuals at all stages. Data regarding the chorology and phytogeographical distribution of species were obtained from the extant literature, principally from the floras of Lebrun and Stork [25] and the works of Ndjele [26], Sonké [27], Senterre [22], Nshimba [24], and Lisingo [17]. Additionally, online databases (www.tropicos.org and www.ville-ge.ch/musinfo/bd/cjb/africa ) were consulted. The spacings applied during their establishment were utilized to assess the initial density of rubber plantations in Sankuru province. The establishment of rubber plantations in this region occurred in the 1939s, employing a spacing configuration of 6.66 m x 3.33 m, corresponding to an initial density of 495 trees per hectare, equivalent to 295 trees per 60 ares plot [28].

2.3. Data Analysis

Monitoring dendrometry parameters has facilitated the characterization of rubber plantations and their associated plant communities concerning diversity and structure. The variables selected to express these parameters are derived directly from field measurements [16].

2.3.1. Composition and Floristic Richness of Rubber Plantations

The floristic composition and richness of each rubber plantation type were assessed by analysing various floristic indicators, including the number of individuals, species, genera, and families, and basal area per sample plot (or per hectare). Relative abundance and dominance were calculated for each species and family, along with an importance value index, to classify species and families according to their level of importance in rubber plantations. The values of these indicators were calculated using Microsoft Excel 2021. The Student's t-test was implemented through the R Commander interface integrated into R [19,29,30] to assess the equality of mean densities (individuals, species, and families) and mean basal area of the two plantation types. The rationale behind employing this parametric test stemmed from the findings of the Shapiro-Wilk normality test and the Fisher test, which attested to the normality and equality of variances across the diverse sets of data collected.
  • Degree of disturbance of rubber plantations
To assess the level of disturbance of rubber plantations in Sankuru, the degree of disturbance of each type of plantation was evaluated. This was achieved by determining the weight of pioneer species in relation to the total number of species inventoried. The " Pioneer " index [30] was calculated for this purpose according to equation 1:
PI   = [ ( pi   +   np )   /   N ]   X   100
In this study, pi represents the number of individuals of pioneer species, np denotes the number of individuals of non-pioneer but heliophilous species, and N signifies the total number of individuals of all species inventoried. PI ranges from 0, indicating an absence of pioneer species and, consequently, an absence of disturbance, to 100, representing all species as pioneers, resulting in a complete disturbance or secondarization of the forest. This Pioneer Index is an effective metric for evaluating the extent of disturbance or degradation within a forest ecosystem. It can distinguish secondary and mature forests at the 50% threshold [31].
The decision to calculate the pioneer species index as part of this study was based on the importance of understanding the ecological role of pioneer species in Sankuru's historic rubber plantations. The evaluation of this index facilitated a more profound comprehension of the dynamics of plant succession and the process of ecological regeneration in these plantations. Furthermore, it facilitated the identification of species that promote the evolution of plant communities over time. Moreover, the index has contributed to our understanding of the capacity of these plantations to restore themselves naturally, while assessing the impact of human management on biodiversity. This comprehensive approach offers a more nuanced perspective on the floristic structure of plantations, thereby facilitating biodiversity conservation and the sustainability of agricultural practices within these ecosystems.
  • Relative density
The abundance, or relative density, of a species or family is the ratio of the number of individuals of a species or family to the total number of individuals in the sample. The relative density (Dr) for each species and family was calculated using the following equation (2):
Dr   = 100   × Number   of   individuals   of   the   species   or   family T o t a l   n u m b e r   o f   i n d i v i d u a l s   i n   t h e   s a m p l e
The decision to assess relative density is based on the importance of understanding species distribution within these two types of plantations. This methodological approach facilitates a more profound comprehension of floristic diversity and enables the monitoring of the evolution of historical rubber plantations. Consequently, it enhances sustainable management and conservation of local ecosystems in Sankuru.
  • Relative dominance
Relative dominance is defined as the ratio of the basal area of a given species or family to the total basal area. The relative dominance (Dor) for each species and family was calculated using the following equation (3):
Dor   =   100   × Basal   area   of   the   species   or   family Total   basal   area   of   sample
The decision to assess relative dominance in this study was based on the need to understand the impact of the most abundant species (basal area) within the historical rubber plantations of Sankuru. This approach facilitated the identification of species that dominate the plant landscape, thereby influencing the structure and dynamics of local ecosystems. By assessing relative dominance, we could better understand the mechanisms of natural regeneration, the interactions between species, and their role in the ecological balance of plantations. This approach is instrumental in formulating sustainable management and conservation strategies tailored to the unique characteristics of Sankuru ecosystems.
  • Importance value index
The importance value index is a metric that quantifies a species' dominance within a specific environment. It is calculated by the sum of relative abundance (Dr) and relative dominance (Dor), with a range of values from 0 to 100. The importance value index has been calculated for species and families in state and farmer plantations using formula (4) for species and formula (5) for families.
IVI = Dr + Dor 2
IVI = Dr + Dor + Dir 3
In this study, a family's relative diversity (Dr) is the ratio between the number of species in the family and the total number of species. The relative density (Dr) is expressed as the ratio between the number of species in the family and the total number of species. The relative dominance (Dor) is calculated as the ratio between the number of species in the family and the total number of species. The rationale for evaluating the species importance value index in this study is predicated on the necessity to obtain an integrated measure of the relative importance of each species within historical rubber plantations. The utilization of this index in the present study enables the identification of species that necessitate consideration for developing sustainable management strategies, thereby fostering biodiversity conservation in rubber plantations within the Sankuru region.
  • Area-species and individual-species curves
The area-species curve is a graphical representation of the increase in species found in a biotope as a function of the number of samples taken. The individuals-species curve, on the other hand, signifies the number of individuals per species surveyed. The area-species and individual-species curves were calculated using the specaccum function in the vegan package of R software [19], using the random method. The red line in the centre represents the area-species curve, and the coloured area (green or pink) represents the confidence interval.
The choice to evaluate the area-species and individual-species curves in this study is based on the desire to analyse the dynamics of floristic diversity within the historical rubber plantations of Sankuru. The area-species curve is a quantitative metric that quantifies the relationship between the number of species present and the sample area. It provides information on species richness and distribution in different plantation areas. Conversely, the individual-species curve facilitates the visualisation of species distribution according to their abundance, thereby identifying the most abundant and the rarest species. This, in turn, contributes to a more profound comprehension of the plant community's structural dynamics. The integration of richness and abundance dimensions offered by these two curves provides fundamental insights into the ecological equilibrium and species diversity within these plantations. This, in turn, enables the adaptation of sustainable management strategies to ensure the preservation of local biodiversity and the regeneration of tropical ecosystems in the Sankuru region.
  • Stand diameter structure
Tree populations were classified into 10 diameter classes to characterise the two plantation types and compare them in stand structure. The diameter classes were established using diameter at breast height (dbh) data as a reference. The horizontal and vertical structures of the former Lodja and Lomela plantations were then compared. To this end, an analysis of variance was performed to assess differences between plantations and standardised values of structural parameters. To examine variations in tree land area in former rubber plantations in the Lodja and Lomela territories, a one-factor analysis of variance was performed when all conditions were met. The Kruskal-Wallis test was employed when the conditions were not met.
The decision to evaluate the diametric structure of the study area is rooted in its significance in elucidating diametric class distribution and growth dynamics. This analysis provides insights into the age, regeneration, and overall health of the Sankuru's historic rubber plantations. We have discerned salient trends through meticulous analysis, including the prevalence of young, rapidly growing individuals, suggesting active regeneration. Conversely, the absence of young trees could indicate a paucity of natural renewal. This approach also provides essential information for plantation management by identifying potential imbalances in size distribution, which could impact long-term productivity and biodiversity. This assessment is a pivotal instrument for elucidating the dynamics of rubber stands and fostering a more profound comprehension of their evolution within the paradigm of sustainable management and conservation of local ecosystems in the Sankuru region.

2.3.2. Characterization of Floristic Diversity in Rubber Plantations

Quantitative diversity, which considers both species richness and the number of individuals within a species, was evaluated using the Shannon-Wiener [32], Simpson [33], and Piélou [34] diversity and equitability indices. These indices were calculated using PAST 4.0.3 software [34]. The Shannon-Wiener diversity index was calculated using the following formula [35]:
H ' =   - i = 1 m ( Pi   × ln ( Pi ) )
In this study, H' is defined as the Shannon diversity index, m is the total number of species recorded in the ecosystem in question, and Pi is the individual proportion of species i. The Shannon index is a widely used metric for assessing species richness and evenness in an ecosystem [36]. In the context of our study, this index is particularly relevant for quantifying the diversity of plant species present in historical rubber plantations. Higher values of the index indicate greater specific diversity. This index enabled a comparative analysis of plant diversity between state-owned and peasant plantations, providing crucial information for understanding the impact of plantation management and structure on local biodiversity. The index typically ranges from 1 to 5 [36]. The index is classified as low when H' is less than 3 bits, medium when H' is between 3 bits and 4 bits, and high when H' is between 4 and 5 bits, with H' rarely exceeding 5 bits [36].
Simpson's index, developed by Edward Simpson in 1949, is a metric for assessing biodiversity. It calculates the probability that two randomly selected individuals belong to the same species. The formula employed to calculate Simpson's index is as follows (7):
1 - D   =   1 - i = 0 S ni N 2
In this study, Simpson's index (1-D) was employed to measure diversity, with S representing the number of species, ni denoting the number of individuals of species i, and N signifying the total number of individuals. This index will have a value of 1 to determine maximum diversity, while minimum diversity (all individuals belonging to a single species) is indicated by a value of 0.
The Piélou equitability index was calculated using the following formula (8):
J = H ' ln S
In this study, J is defined as Pielou’s equitability index, H′ is Shannon's diversity index, S is the total number of species recorded in the ecosystem under consideration, and ln is the natural logarithm. Ln S is the theoretical maximum diversity value. The J equitability index quantifies the distribution of individuals across the species present in an ecosystem. It facilitates the assessment of population distribution across species within a plantation, potentially unveiling significant ecological dynamics such as the dominance of one species over others. The J index ranges from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating more balanced environments, and 1 representing the maximum attainable value. The student’s t-test assessed the equality of the mean values of Shannon's diversity index, Simpson's diversity index, and Pielou's equitability index.
The Shannon-Wiener, Simpson, and Piélou indices were selected based on their demonstrated capacity to furnish pertinent information concerning biodiversity. These indices were chosen to support the study's objective of characterising the floristic diversity and ecological dynamics of rubber plantations in Sankuru. These indices enabled the exploration of the complex relationships between plantation management, species diversity, and the ecosystem services provided by these plantations. This exploration contributed to a better understanding of the mechanisms of conservation and sustainable management of natural resources in this region.

2.3.3. Assessing the Similarity of Different Plantations

The degree of floristic similarity between different rubber plantation sites is determined using Sørensen's similarity coefficient. This coefficient is a quantitative metric that quantifies the degree of similarity between two environments [37]. The coefficient is calculated by the following formula (9):
Cs = 100 × 2 c a   +   b
In ecological analysis, Sørensen's coefficient of similarity (Cs) is a metric that quantifies the degree of similarity between two biological communities, or environments, A and B. The coefficient is calculated as follows: Cs = a + b – c, where a is the number of species common to environments A and B, b is the number of species found in environment B, and c is the number of species found in environment A. This coefficient measures the similarity between the two environments regarding their floral composition. This index is frequently employed in ecological studies to compare the specific composition of diverse plant communities [36]. In this study, we used this coefficient to assess the floristic similarity between different rubber plantations, specifically between state and peasant plantations, to elucidate the similarities and differences in the species present. This is imperative for the analysis of local biodiversity and the management of these ecosystems. This analysis is crucial for assessing the role of historical rubber plantations in terms of biodiversity conservation and for formulating recommendations for the sustainable management of natural resources. The range of Cs values is from 0 to 100%.
The greater the number of species common to the plantations, the more Cs approaches 100%. Conversely, when the floristic dissimilarity is high, the similarity coefficient approaches 0. It is widely accepted that two environments are considered similar when the similarity coefficient is greater than or equal to 50%. Conversely, if the similarity coefficient is less than 50%, it is concluded that there is an absence of similarity between the floristic lists of the environments in question [36].
The decision to use Sørensen's coefficient of similarity in this study is based on its ability to comparatively analyse the floristic composition of different plantation types, particularly between state and peasant rubber plantations in Sankuru. This index has facilitated the acquisition of pivotal information regarding the similarity of two distinct plantation types, a prerequisite for comprehending the repercussions of management practices (state versus peasant) on floristic diversity. Furthermore, it offers a reliable instrument for evaluating the consequences of natural regeneration, silvicultural interventions, and environmental disturbances on the structure of rubber plantations. This is a pivotal step in formulating strategies for the sustainable management and conservation of these ecosystems in the Sankuru region.

3. Results

3.1. Rubberwood Density in the Inventory Year (2023) for Both Types of Plantations

Data on the current density of rubber plantations in Sankuru are shown in Figure 2 below.
Figure 2 demonstrates that the stem density in Sankuru rubber plantations is higher in peasant plantations, with an average of 700 stems per hectare, than in state plantations, where the density is 396 stems per hectare. A statistical analysis, employing Student's t-test, revealed a significant disparity between the two types of plantations regarding stem density (t = 7.26, p = 2.97.10-10). These findings offer intriguing prospects for an integrated approach to managing these historic plantations, particularly within the framework of an agroforestry model. The observed density variations may prove pivotal in determining optimal management practices. Optimizing agroforestry practices can be developed by incorporating these variations into the management strategies. These practices aim to enhance productivity while preserving biodiversity and strengthening the resilience of local ecosystems. Adopting an adapted management approach for rubber plantations within an agroforestry framework, considering current plantation densities, can harmonize sustainable production and environmental conservation while addressing the socio-economic needs of rural communities.

3.2. Floristic Composition of Sankuru Rubber Plantations

3.2.1. Floristic Richness

The floristic inventory documented 1,630 tree-plant individuals, comprising 105 species, 90 genera, and 33 botanical families (Table 2) within the rubber plantations of Sankuru Province, collectively classified based on their typology (state and peasant). Regarding species richness, the Fabaceae family is the most abundant, with 22 species, representing 20.95% of the total number of species present in the rubber plantations. It is followed by the Meliaceae (8.57%), Euphorbiaceae (6.67%), Olacaceae (5.71%), Clusiaceae, and Moraceae (4.76% each), Phyllanthaceae, Annonaceae, Apocynaceae, and Malvaceae (3.81% each) families. The remaining families are represented by one to two species. In addition to Hevea brasiliensis, the most common species include Plagiostyles africana, Petersianthus macrocarpus, Hymenocardia ulmoides, Piptadeniastrum africanum, Bellucia grossularioides, Barteria nigritana, Caloncoba welwitschii, Pterocarpus soyauxii, Grewia trinervia, and Gilletiodendron kisantuense.
When evaluated independently, state plantations are inhabited by 75 tree species, which are grouped into 63 genera and 27 botanical families. The average density of these plantations is 635 trees per hectare, with a standard deviation of ±84.06; this includes an average of 41 species per hectare, 25 species per hectare, 25 genera per hectare, and 19 families per hectare. The basal area of these plantations is 29,880 square meters per hectare, with a standard deviation of ±5. The basal area of state plantations is 8 per hectare, in comparison to 74 species in 71 genera and 30 botanical families, with an average density of 828±144.62 trees, 28±4.59 species, 27.5±4.86 genera, and 16±1.62 families per hectare in peasant plantations (Table 2).
Considered separately, state plantations are home to 75 species of arborescent plants grouped into 63 genera and 27 botanical families with an average density of 635±84.06 trees, 41±7.49 species, 25±2.3 genera, 19±3, 06 fa-miles per hectare, compared with 74 species grouped into 71 genera and 30 botanical families, with an average density of 828±144.62 trees, 28±4.59 species, 27.5±4.86 genera, 16±1.62 families per hectare in peasant plantations (Table 2).
The findings concerning the values of composition indicators and floristic richness for two types of plantations (Table 2) underscore the necessity of implementing an integrated approach to managing these rubber plantations. Such an approach would encompass managing floristic diversity and species composition to promote resilient ecosystems. A balanced management strategy, integrating the enhancement of species richness and the management of tree density, will facilitate the maintenance of biodiversity within the plantations, while concurrently optimizing their production within the context of agroforestry. This approach will ensure the long-term sustainability of Sankuru's historic rubber plantations while benefiting local communities.

3.2.2. Basal Area

The mean basal area of state plantations was 29.88 ± 5.8 m2/ha, compared to 41.37 ± 7.57 m2/ha observed in farmers' plantations (see Figure 3). This discrepancy can be attributed to a high density of small-diameter trees, resulting in a low sum of tree cross-sections measured at 1.30m from the ground. State and farmer plantations of Hevea brasiliensis are dominated by small-diameter trees, with few large-diameter trees, resulting in a high density of small-diameter trees per hectare. The outcomes of Student's t-test demonstrate that the mean values of the various indicators are significantly different between the two types of plantations (p < 0.05). The mean values are significantly different in terms of density in individuals (t = 4.61, p = 3.45.10-4), in species (t = 4.61, p = 3.45.10-4), in families (t = 3.3, p = 5.56.10-3), and in basal area (t = -3.81, p = 1.42.10-3). State plantations have higher species and family densities per hectare than peasant plantations. Conversely, peasant plantations demonstrate higher metrics such as the number of trees per hectare, the number of genera per hectare, and the average basal area.
The results presented in Figure 3 suggest that peasant plantations, despite exhibiting a larger basal area, are dominated by small-diameter trees. This phenomenon may indicate an insufficient optimal management of tree density and silvicultural treatments over time. In an integrated approach to managing these plantations, this information underscores the importance of promoting agroforestry practices that balance tree density, regeneration, and growth. A sustainable management strategy for historical rubber plantations, involving effective control of density and species composition, will enhance plantation productivity, improve their capacity to sequester carbon, preserve biodiversity, and provide various ecosystem services to local communities. This will ensure their long-term sustainability in an agroforestry context.

3.2.3. Relative Abundance

Figure 4 and Figure 5 illustrate the most prominent species and families in terms of species and individuals in the Sankuru rubber plantations. It should be noted that only the top ten families and species are shown in the figures, and they are listed in descending order of relative abundance or frequency. The ten most abundant species in state plantations alone represent 94%, and they are Hevea brasiliensis (84.72%), Plagiostyles africana (2.65%), Barteria nigritana (2.32%), and Hymenocardia ulmoides (0.94%), Funtumia elastica (0.77%), Petersianthus macrocarpus (0.66%), Piptadeniastrum africanum (0.66%), Antiaris toxicaria (0.52%), Symphonia globulifera (0.50%), and Trilepisium madagascariense (0.48%). The remaining 5.78% of the identified species are classified as "other." In farmers' plantations, the top ten species account for 87% of the total, comprising Hevea brasiliensis (62.33%), Plagiostyles africana (7.98%), Petersianthus macrocarpus (4.82%), Hymenocardia ulmoides (3, 87%), Bellucia grossularioides (2.58%), Caloncoba welwitschii (1.45%), Piptadeniastrum africanum (1.18%), Barteria nigritana (0.94%), Carapa procera (0.88%), and Grewia trinervia (0.85%). The remaining species represent only 13.11% of the total.
Concerning the classification of plant families, state plantations are predominantly comprised of Fabaceae (24%), Meliaceae (10.67%), Olacaceae (6.67% each), Clusiaceae and Phyllanthaceae (5.33% each), Apocynaceae, Moraceae and Myristicaceae (4% each), and Anacardiaceae (2.67%) (Figure 3). In contrast, peasant plantations are dominated by the Fabaceae (14.86%), Euphorbiaceae (9.46%), Meliaceae (8.11%), Moraceae (6.76%), Phyllanthaceae (5.41%), Apocynaceae, Burseraceae, Clusiaceae, Malvaceae, and Myristicaceae families (4.05% each) (Figure 5). A closer look reveals that the Fabaceae, Euphorbiaceae, and Meliaceae families are the most prominent in both plantations. In addition, the species Plagiostyles africana, Petersianthus macrocarpus, Hymenocardia ulmoides, Piptadeniastrum africanum, Bellucia grossularioides, Caloncoba welwitschii, and Barteria nigritana are the most represented in state and farmer plantations, in conjunction with Hevea brasiliensis.
The primary implication of these results (Figure 4 and Figure 5) within the framework of an integrated management approach is the necessity of introducing agroforestry practices that promote enhanced coexistence between rubber and other plant species. This approach would contribute to enhanced biodiversity and strengthened ecosystem services, ensuring the sustainability of plantations by stabilizing soils, increasing carbon sequestration, and more balancedly meeting the needs of local communities. This integrated management approach is poised to establish a sustainable agricultural model that prioritizes economic productivity and environmental conservation.

3.2.4. Relative Dominance

The relative dominance of the top ten species and top seven botanical families in Sankuru rubber plantations is demonstrated in Figure 6 and Figure 7. In state-owned plantations, the top ten species exhibit an 87% relative dominance, while the remaining 64 species collectively account for 13%. The ten species are Hevea brasiliensis (61.18%), Plagiostyles africana (6.37%), Petersianthus macrocarpus (5.34%), Hymenocardia ulmoides (4.41%), Piptadeniastrum africanum (3.68%), Bellucia grossularioides (1.82%), Albizia gummifera (1.17%), Pterocarpus soyauxii (1.09%), Gilletiodendron kisantuense (1.04%), and Grewia trinervia (0.89%). In Peasant's plantations, the top ten species exhibit a relative dominance of 94.69% compared to 5.1% for the remaining 65 species. The ten species are Hevea brasiliensis (84.17%), Plagiostyles africana (2.64%), Piptadeniastrum africanum (2.49%), Trilepisium madagascariense (1.03%), Petersianthus macrocarpus (0.91%), Barteria nigritana (0.80%), Hymenocardia ulmoides (0.77%), Pterocarpus soyauxii (0.70%), Funtumia elastica (0.64%), and Antiaris toxicaria (0.54%).
Regarding the relative dominance of the families listed in state plantations, the first seven families demonstrate 93% relative dominance, compared with 17% for the remaining 22 families. Of these seven families, Euphorbiaceae (69.05%), Fabaceae (9.56%), Lecythidaceae (5.34%), Phyllanthaceae (5.17%), Melastomataceae (1.82%), Moraceae (1.19%), and Meliaceae (1.05%) are shown in Figure 5. In peasant plantations, the first seven families exhibit a relative dominance of 96%, while the remaining 25 demonstrate a relative dominance of 14%. A closer look at the seven families reveals the following: Euphorbiaceae (87.12%), Fabaceae (3.69%), Moraceae (1.92%), Passifloraceae (0.80%), Phyllanthaceae (0.95%), Apocynaceae (0.89%), and Myristicaceae (0.56%).
This dominance may have implications for the ecological resilience of plantations, their ability to support functional biodiversity, and their long-term sustainability. In an integrated approach to the management of historical rubber plantations, these results underscore the importance of enhancing floristic diversity and promoting agroforestry practices that encourage the coexistence of rubber with other plant species present. Such a strategy could enhance the sustainability of plantations, improve their ecological stability, and meet the socio-economic needs of local communities by diversifying available resources.

3.2.5. Species Rarefaction Curve and Area-Species Curve

The species-individual curve, also called the species rarefaction curve, is a graphical representation of the relationship between species richness and the number of individuals. This curve demonstrates that species richness increases with an increase in the number of individuals in both types of rubber plantation (Figure 8). There is an exponential increase in species up to around 150 individuals, with a more pronounced increase for state-owned plantations, resulting in a higher species richness in the latter than in peasant plantations. Beyond this number of individuals, the rate of increase in species richness plateaus, stabilizing at a higher level above 200 individuals. A similar trend is observed in the area-species curve. The area-species curve demonstrates a substantial increase in species richness with an increase in the sampled area up to 2 hectares. Beyond this threshold, the increase in species richness plateaus, and the number of species stabilizes at approximately 70 species at 3.5 hectares of sampled area.

3.2.6. Importance Value Index

An analysis of the importance value index reveals the top ten species and top seven botanical families for each of the two types of rubber plantations (see Table 3 and Figure 9). The seven families that dominate state plantations in terms of importance value are Euphorbiaceae (69.96%), Fabaceae (7.33%), Lecythidaceae (5.08%), Phyllanthaceae (4.74%), Melastomataceae (2.20%), and Meliaceae (1.44%) (Table 4 and Figure 11). The dominant species are Hevea brasiliensis (61.76%), Plagiostyles africana (7.17%), Petersianthus macrocarpus (5.08%), Hymenocardia ulmoides (4.14%), Piptadeniastrum africanum (2.43%), and Bellucia grossularioides (2.20%). These six families collectively represent 89% of the importance value, with the remaining 21 families accounting for a mere 11% (Figure 9). In peasant plantations, the seven dominant families are Euphorbiaceae (87.45%), Fabaceae (2.53%), Moraceae (1.61%), Passifloraceae (1.56%), Phyllanthaceae (1.09%), and Apocynaceae (0.90%). The remaining 24 families collectively account for 12.55% of the total (Figure 10). The most prevalent species are Hevea brasiliensis (84.44%), Plagiostyles africana (2.64%), Piptadeniastrum africanum (1.58%), Barteria nigritana (1.56%), Hymenocardia ulmoides (0.86%), and Petersianthus macrocarpus (0.79%) (Figure 10). Regarding the importance value index, both types of plantations are characterized by species and botanical families that are relatively the same. It should also be noted that the rubber tree is more dominant in peasant plantations than in state plantations, so the proportion of companion species is lower in the former than in the latter.
The results underscore the significance and necessity of managing floristic diversity in these plantation systems, as evidenced by the findings on the importance value of species and families. In an integrated management approach, promoting a management strategy that balances rubber dominance with preserving and enhancing diversity among companion species is imperative. This approach contributes to the long-term ecological sustainability of plantations. Integrating agroecological principles and practices, such as agroforestry, is essential for enhancing the resilience of plantation ecosystems. This integration fosters a symbiotic relationship between latex production and biodiversity conservation, supporting long-term socio-environmental sustainability objectives.

3.3. Floristic Diversity of Sankuru Rubber Plantations

The floristic diversity of rubber plantations was assessed using the Shannon, Simpson, Piélou, and Sørensen indices. The results of the floristic diversity indices and the statistical analyses applied are shown in Table 5 and Figure 11.
Figure 11. Comparison of ecological parameters between peasant and state rubber plantations in Sankuru, DR Congo: (A) species richness, (B) stem density (trees/ha), (C) Shannon-Wiener diversity index, and (D) Pielou equitability.
Figure 11. Comparison of ecological parameters between peasant and state rubber plantations in Sankuru, DR Congo: (A) species richness, (B) stem density (trees/ha), (C) Shannon-Wiener diversity index, and (D) Pielou equitability.
Preprints 158639 g011

3.3.1. Shannon Diversity Index

The Shannon-Wiener diversity index (H') exhibited considerable variation among the various types of rubber plantations, with values ranging from 0.93 for peasant plantations to 1.87 for state plantations. Substantial variability exists within the plantation types. Specifically, the index exhibited a range from 0.50 to 2.50 for state plantations and from 0.45 to 1.60 for peasant plantations. These findings indicate that Sankuru's rubber plantations exhibit a limited species diversity, irrespective of their typology. The statistical analysis, employing Student's t-test, reveals that the mean values of the Shannon index for these two categories of plantations are statistically different (t = 3.93, p = 1.05.10-3), with state plantations exhibiting greater diversification compared to peasant plantations.
The findings indicate that prevailing practices, notably the absence of silvicultural treatments, hinder the harmonious coexistence of rubber and other species, thereby compromising the resilience of these systems to environmental and economic disturbances. Consequently, integrated agroforestry management holds potential in supporting local communities by offering additional resources, including non-timber forest products, while achieving rubber production objectives. In light of these findings, adopting diversified agroforestry practices in Sankuru's historic rubber plantations is a pivotal solution for enhancing ecosystem resilience, increasing profitability, and ensuring long-term ecological and socio-economic sustainability.

3.3.2. Simpson’s Diversity Index

The total Simpson index values range from 0.28 for peasant plantations to 0.60 for state plantations. These values indicate that floristic diversity is lower in peasant plantations, where trees have less than a 30% chance of belonging to different species. In contrast, state plantations exhibit higher diversity, with trees having a 60% probability of belonging to different species. This suggests a more equitable distribution of species and a more diverse plant ecosystem. Moreover, the student’s t-test outcomes demonstrate that the mean values of this index, ascertained for each of the two plantation types, exhibit significant disparities (t = 3.91, p = 1.02.10-3).
The practical implications of these results underscore that farmer plantations could benefit from improved management practices to encourage species diversification and limit the dominance of one or a few species. For state-owned plantations, although diversity is comparatively higher, it remains imperative to maintain or enhance this diversity through sustainable management practices (silvicultural treatments), notably by reinforcing agroecological principles and promoting harmonious coexistence between rubber production and biodiversity conservation. The statistical analysis (t = 3.91, p = 1.02.10-3) substantiates the necessity to prioritize the distinctions between these two categories of plantations, underscoring the indispensability of context-specific management strategies to optimize ecosystem services and ensure the long-term viability of these plantations.

3.3.3. Piélou Equitability Index

Piélou's equitability index reveals values of 0.22 for peasant plantations and 0.43 for state plantations. These findings suggest that the distribution of individuals across the 105 species is less balanced in peasant plantations compared to state plantations. This suggests that certain species exhibit higher levels of dominance in peasant plantations, leading to a greater concentration of individuals within a smaller number of species. Conversely, state plantations exhibit a more equitable distribution of individuals across species. This observation is further substantiated by a statistically significant disparity (t = 3.67, p = 1.78.10-3) as determined by Student's t-test, which lends further credence to the hypothesis that the ecological framework of state plantations is more balanced than that of peasant plantations. These findings imply that enhancing the management of species diversity in peasant plantations could lead to a more equitable distribution of individuals, potentially strengthening the ecological resilience of plantations and promoting sustainable natural resource management.

3.3.4. Floristic Similarity of Different Plantation Types

Sørensen's coefficient of similarity (Cs) was employed to assess the floristic affinities between the two distinct types of plantations inventoried. The resultant value of Cs was 57.72, approximately equal to 58. This coefficient value suggests that the two kinds of rubber plantations are not significantly different in terms of the species that comprise them, exhibiting a degree of similarity of 58%. Consequently, the two plantations are deemed to belong to a shared floristic community. The independent Student's t-test, applied to compare the means of the various parameters of floristic richness and diversity (e.g., different densities [individuals, species, genera, family], basal area, Shannon, Simpson, and Piélou indices), demonstrated that the two plantations differ in terms of composition, floristic richness, and diversity.
These findings underscore the necessity of formulating an integrated management strategy that acknowledges the unique floristic characteristics of each plantation type. Such an approach should aim to preserve and enhance ecological diversity while promoting long-term sustainable management. This objective necessitates promoting agroforestry practices, which have been demonstrated to improve the environmental resilience of historical rubber plantations. Furthermore, these practices optimize the carbon sequestration potential, productivity, and sustainability of such plantations in the face of environmental change. The disparities identified between peasant and state plantations underscore the necessity for a nuanced management approach to optimize these systems' ecological and socio-economic benefits.

3.4. Structure of Rubber Plantations in Sankuru

As illustrated in Figure 12, the distribution of trees by diameter class is depicted in the state and peasant rubber plantations studied. The old, abandoned Hevea brasiliensis plantations (state and peasant) generally have a greater number of small-diameter trees, with few large-diameter trees. In state-run and peasant plantations, the largest number of trees is found in the first four diameter classes [10 cm- 40 cm]. The observed structure is characterized by an irregular, inverted J-shape, indicative of a substantial presence of small-diameter trees, interspersed with a limited number of large-diameter trees. In state plantations, the diameter ranges from 10 centimeters to 101.35 centimeters, while in peasant plantations, the diameter ranges from 10 centimeters to 114.64 centimeters.

3.5. Vertical Structure of Rubber Plantations in Sankuru

The results in Figure 12 show the vertical structure of rubber plantations in Sankuru. It highlights significant differences between the two types of plantations, as indicated by the ANOVA test (p = 4.03e-⁶). In both types of plantations, most individuals are found in the upper canopy, with a higher proportion in peasant plantations (83.60%) than in state plantations (73.8%). This high concentration in the upper stratum reflects the dominance of mature Hevea trees. However, the lower strata, namely the subcanopy and the shrub stratum, are proportionally more represented in state plantations, with 16.3% and 9.9% of individuals, respectively, compared with 14.8% and 7.6% in farmer plantations. This more balanced structure between the different plant layers in state plantations suggests greater vertical complexity, probably linked to less intensive silvicultural management or an environment more conducive to natural regeneration and the cohabitation of secondary species.
Figure 12. Vertical structure of historical rubber plantations in Sankuru, showing the distribution of individuals according to three vegetation strata: the upper canopy (≥ 30 m high), the under canopy (≥ 20 m high), and the shrub stratum (average height between 5 and 10 m).
Figure 12. Vertical structure of historical rubber plantations in Sankuru, showing the distribution of individuals according to three vegetation strata: the upper canopy (≥ 30 m high), the under canopy (≥ 20 m high), and the shrub stratum (average height between 5 and 10 m).
Preprints 158639 g013

3.6. Comparison of Temperament Spectra of Two Plantation Types

The results in Figure 13 show a significant difference in the functional composition of species in terms of species temperament between peasant and state plantations. In the peasant plantations, pioneer species, which are highly heliophilic, account for 94% of individuals, reflecting a dominance of species adapted to open or regularly disturbed environments. State plantations, on the other hand, have a more diversified structure, with 84% pioneer species, but a higher proportion of non-pioneer (10%) and shade-tolerant (5%) species. This more balanced structure may reflect different silvicultural management practices, higher plantation density, or more advanced ecological dynamics. The chi-square test (χ² = 417, p < 0.001) and Cramer's V index (0.168) confirm that the distribution of light requirement types is significantly related to plantation type. When evaluated individually, peasant plantations exhibit a higher degree of disturbance, with a pioneer index (PI) of 76.70%, compared with 70.27% in state plantations. The results of the student’s t-test indicate that the mean values of the pioneer index proportions, as determined for each of the two plantation types, are statistically different (t = 6.23, p = 0,001028).
These results highlight that historical rubber plantations in Sankuru are heavily dominated by pioneer species, which could undermine the long-term resilience of agroforestry systems. While necessary for regeneration, Pioneer species can also be invasive and detrimental to ecological diversity, particularly in plantations intended for sustainable production. In this context, integrating agroforestry management strategies, which promote a greater diversity of non-pioneer and shade-tolerant species, is essential to restore the ecological resilience of plantations. This would ensure a more stable balance between rubber production and the conservation of other plant species. In addition, rigorous ecological monitoring, accompanied by appropriate management practices for natural regeneration and species diversity, would be necessary to maintain the long-term sustainability of these plantations in the context of climate change and anthropogenic pressures. Thus, these results should serve as a basis for adapting management practices and implementing agroforestry management measures to maintain soil fertility, preserve local biodiversity, and guarantee the long-term sustainable productivity of rubber plantations.
Figure 13. Distribution of species according to temperament (T: shade tolerant, P: pioneer, NP: non-pioneer) in the two types of rubber plantations in Sankuru.
Figure 13. Distribution of species according to temperament (T: shade tolerant, P: pioneer, NP: non-pioneer) in the two types of rubber plantations in Sankuru.
Preprints 158639 g014

3.7. Chorological Spectra and Phytogeographical Affinity of Two Plantation Types

Table 7 below shows the phytogeographical distribution spectra calculated for each plantation type.
An analysis of Table 7 reveals that the floristic composition of Sankuru's rubber plantations is predominantly characterized by the Guinea-Congolese element, irrespective of the plantation type, including the Omni-Guinea-Congolese and Lower Guinean Congolese phytochories. Student's t-test applied to the comparison of percentages of endemic species between the two types of plantations (86.48% vs. 82.2%) indicates that the difference is not statistically significant (t = 1.27, p > 0.1), suggesting chorological homogeneity between the two management systems.
The predominance of the Guinea-Congolese element in rubber plantations suggests that the species present are well adapted to the climatic and ecological conditions of the Sankuru region. This characteristic is paramount in an agroforestry model, as it ensures that the trees integrated into agroforestry systems will exhibit resilience to local environmental conditions. The utilization of endemic species to the region can enhance the productivity of these plantations while concurrently mitigating the risks associated with climate change and soil degradation. The Omni-Guinea-Congolese and Lower Guinean Congolese phytochories, which predominate in these plantations, exemplify a diverse and robust flora, potentially enhancing biodiversity within agroforestry systems. Integrating these species into an agroforestry model will create diversified and balanced ecosystems, promoting beneficial interactions between different species (plants, animals, micro-organisms), thus contributing to the health of soils and crops in these local ecosystems.

4. Discussion

4.1. Methodological

4.1.1. Inventory Protocol and Sampling

The present study was predicated on the statistical inventory technique (sampling) for data collection. The delimitation of each plot and the location of trees were based on the method developed by Picard [16], and the transects were open and oriented east-west, in line with the methodology used in the work of Lokonda [38] and Gillet [39]. The inventory devices were installed to circumvent the edge effect, a phenomenon that could compromise the results' veracity. This approach aligns with the methodologies outlined in the works of Kasekete et al. [40]. Conventionally, data collection systems have centered on stands of trees with a diameter of 10 centimeters or greater. This threshold value was selected in our study to ensure the comparability of our results with those obtained in other systems in tropical plantations [17,41,42,43,44].
The selection of our protocol was predicated on a compromise between the size and number of sampling units. As asserted by Blanc's study [45], an extensive sampling area enhances the quality of a formation's description. However, this approach concomitantly restricts the number of formations that can be examined, thereby impeding the comprehensive analysis of stand diversity on a large scale, constituting our study's primary objective. Given these considerations, we focused on smaller areas (0.25 ha) to study specific diversity. However, a disadvantage of our methodological approach is that it minimises the information provided by the undergrowth and regeneration (trees ˂ 10 cm dhp), representing a significant proportion of diversity in forest dynamics [22,46,47,48].
To ensure long-term sustainability, future research should concentrate on natural regeneration strategies in these historic rubber plantations. Specifically, further investigation is warranted into the efficacy of agroforestry practices and the introduction of floristic assemblages in enhancing the vertical structure of plantations, thereby fostering their resilience in the face of environmental disturbances. Addressing the identified limitations, integrating novel long-term monitoring approaches, and conducting further studies on the ecological and socio-economic dynamics of these plantations would enhance our understanding of the sustainability challenges faced by rubber plantations in Sankuru province [49]. Developing more integrated and sustainable long-term management strategies is contingent upon the execution of such future research.

4.1.2. Floristic and Structural Characterisation of Sankuru Rubber Plantations

The composition, richness, and floristic diversity of rubber plantations were the focus of a study that utilised various parameters, including the number of individuals, species, genera, families, and importance value. Shannon, Simpson, Piélou, and Sørensen diversity indices were also calculated for state and peasant plantations. Several authors have utilised these same parameters [7,17] to characterise the floristic diversity and structural parameters of plantations and natural forests. The classification of rubber plantations in Sankuru is determined by the type of owner, including state-owned plantations, peasant plantations owned by farmers, religious plantations owned by Catholic missions, and industrial plantations owned by rubber companies. In the present study, we have considered both peasant and state-owned plantations, considering that industrial and religious plantations can be regarded similarly to state-owned plantations [1,2]. The sampling effort employed in this study (10 hectares for each type of plantation) is adequate, as the area-species curve indicates that the number of species scarcely increases beyond 2.5 hectares of sampled area.

4.2. Current Density of Historical Rubber Plantations in Sankuru

A critical first step in understanding the impact of historical rubber plantations on local ecosystems and the regional economy is to assess the current density of such plantations in the Sankuru region. The planting of rubber trees in this area has been extensive since the early 1940s, primarily driven by the increasing demand for natural rubber. The data collected in this study indicate that current plantation densities vary considerably between the two types of plantations (t = 7.26, p = 2.97.10-10). On average, peasant plantations, where cultivation practices are primarily maintained by the peasant owners, exhibited an average density of approximately 700 trees per hectare. In contrast, state-owned plantations, which are virtually abandoned with a complete absence of maintenance, showed an average density of 396 trees per hectare. These plantations are susceptible to infestations, leading to the death of the rubber trees and the subsequent colonization by other species. The higher density of rubber stems per hectare in the peasant plantations, which exceeded the initial density when the plantations were established, can be explained by strong natural rubber regeneration. This phenomenon aligns with the findings reported by Bustillo et al. [50], who documented an average of 506 rubber trees per hectare in H. brasiliensis plantations at Yangambi in the DRC.
Conversely, the low density (396 stems per hectare) observed in state-owned plantations can be attributed to various factors, including the aging of trees, inadequate maintenance, and the gradual conversion of land to alternative agricultural uses, such as slash-and-burn agriculture. Furthermore, Lan et al. [7] have noted that natural succession and the invasion of other plant species can also contribute to a reduction in rubber tree density. The environmental impact associated with these plantations must also be considered. Intensive rubber monoculture can lead to a decrease in local biodiversity, as well as soil degradation due to unsustainable cultivation practices [51]. Considering the evolution of world natural rubber markets and sustainable development challenges, Sankuru's historical rubber plantations, now transitioning towards agroforestry strategies, are positioned as sustainable solutions. This is imperative to ensure economic profitability and preserve Sankuru's ecological capital [13].

4.3. Floristic Composition of Historical Rubber Plantations in Sankuru

4.3.1. Floristic Richness, Specificity, Diversity, and Similarity Indices

State and peasant plantations initially composed exclusively of H. brasiliensis have been colonized by other companion species, mostly heliophilous, which take advantage of the canopy opening following the fall of H. brasiliensis. These findings are consistent with those reported by Lan et al. [7] in a rubber plantation under natural management on Hainan Island in southern China.
A total of 105 species were documented in the study, and the dominant species were primarily affiliated with nine families. The most prevalent families are Fabaceae (18), Meliaceae (8), Euphorbiaceae (5), Olacaceae (5), Clusiaceae (4), Phyllanthaceae (4), Apocynaceae (3), Moraceae (3), and Myristicaceae (3). The predominance of these families in Sankuru's natural forests underscores their ecological significance. This assertion is further substantiated by Fonu's [50] study, which examined the floristic diversity of sacred forests in the Lukumbe sector of Sankuru Province. The study revealed that the families with the highest species representation were Fabaceae, Euphorbiaceae, and Olacaceae. Furthermore, the most significant species in rubber plantations are those characteristics of the northern Sankuru region, which is occupied by evergreen rainforest, with the dominant species being sun-loving species [52,53].
The level of floristic diversity expressed in terms of Shannon and Simpson diversity indices and Pielou's equitability index demonstrates that Sankuru rubber plantations are characterised by a paucity of diversity and an imbalanced distribution of individuals across species. This diversity is also lower than in secondary forests [54]. The student’s t-test reveals a statistically significant difference in floristic diversity between state and peasant plantations, with the former exhibiting greater diversity. The results of this study demonstrate the absence of substantial differences between the botanical families of importance in terms of species accompanying the rubber tree in state plantations and those of peasant plantations. A study by Lan et al. [7] on the Chinese island of Hainan revealed that rubber plantations managed closely to natural "rubber forests" exhibit a degree of floristic diversity comparable to that observed in natural tropical forests.
The trends as mentioned above were reported by Gouyon et al. [8] in their study of "Jungle rubber" agroforestry systems in southeast Sumatra, Indonesia, and by Wibawa et al. in their research of rubber plantations on the island of Java, also in Indonesia. In Jambi Province, rubber forests contain 116 tree species [55]. These results differ from those of the present study. This discrepancy can be attributed to the diameter threshold used for species enumeration. The former research enumerated all individuals with a diameter of 5 cm or greater at breast height, whereas the latter used a diameter threshold of 10 cm. Peasant H. brasiliensis plantations exhibit a significantly higher number of individuals per hectare, accompanied by smaller mean diameters, than state H. brasiliensis plantations (p-value equal to 0.00034). The dispersal mechanisms of these species, which are believed to underlie the observed biodiversity in these plantations initially dominated by a single species, are thought to be influenced by disturbances such as clearings or areas affected by falling trees, leading to the formation of mosaics [56].
In this case, the disturbed areas of the rubber plantations played a pivotal role in these dynamics, promoting colonisation by pioneer species and the growth of individuals in the undergrowth [57]. Consequently, these species modify the structure and composition of Sankuru's rubber plantations over time. The greater the windfall, defined as the mortality of rubber trees due to falling, the greater the luminosity, thereby offering pioneer species the opportunity to establish and grow rapidly. A robust correlation has been observed between tree density, both within rubber trees and across the entire plantation, and various floristic diversity indices, including H, 1-D, and J. The opening up of the canopy, notably by the death of plants attacked by root rot, allows other species to colonise the plantations [53]. The presence of holes left by dead rubber trees was more pronounced on state-owned plantations than on peasant plantations, as evidenced during inventories. A correlation analysis revealed a strong negative correlation between density (number of plants per hectare) and diversity and equitability indices. These findings are consistent with those reported by Schnitzer and Bongers [58], who noted that the density of anemochore-dispersing trees in African forests is associated with the impact of anthropogenic disturbance.

4.3.2. Species Rarefaction Curve and Area-Species Curve

The present study's findings demonstrate that species richness increases proportionately to the area sampled in the two types of rubber plantations in the two territories of Lodja and Lomela. These findings are consistent with those reported by Appiah-Badu et al. [59] in rubber plantations in the Awudua forest of Ghana, who also observed an increase in species richness with increasing area sampled. The area-species curve, which depicts species accumulation as a function of area sampled, distinctly demonstrates the variation in species numbers among the two types of plantations. State plantations exhibited a higher species richness than peasant plantations, irrespective of the area under consideration.
The shape of the curves indicates that the sampling effort was sufficient to capture the maximum number of species, as the increase in area sampled has a negligible influence on the number of species [60]. These outcomes are analogous to those reported by Lan et al. [7] in naturally managed rubber plantations on Hainan Island in China, who found that over 90% of the dominant species were already present in 1 ha of sampled area.

4.4. Structure of Historical Rubber Plantations in Sankuru

In the context of rubber plantations, it has been observed that the distribution of trees into different diameter classes aligns closely with the decreasing exponential model, wherein the number of individuals decreases as diameter classes progress to higher values [43]. The Sankuru rubber plantations exhibit an inverted J-shaped structure, characteristic of undisturbed tropical forests, with a substantial presence of small-diameter trees and a limited number of large trees. This distribution resembles other authors' descriptions of forest formations in the sub-region [59]. This distribution indicates a regular dynamic, denoting constant regeneration over time, and characterises a stable stand where woody individuals provide mutual support [17].
This distribution is regarded as an indicator of equilibrium in forest structure, particularly in natural stands. The diametric structure observed in the Sankuru rubber plantations can be attributed to their current state, which is beginning to resemble a natural forest [13]. This study's findings are consistent with those reported by Lan et al. [7] in naturally managed rubber plantations on Hainan Island.

4.5. Species Temperament and Degree of Ecological Disturbance in Historic Rubber Plantations in Sankuru: Challenges for Biodiversity Conservation

The results of the study on the temperament of floristic species in historical rubber plantations in Sankuru indicate a strong dominance of pioneer species, particularly in peasant plantations where they represent 94% of individuals, compared with 84% in state plantations. This predominance of heliophilous species is indicative of a regeneration that is strongly oriented towards opportunistic species, which are generally associated with open or degraded environments. In contrast, state plantations exhibit a more diversified functional structure, including a significant proportion of shade-tolerant (5%) and non-pioneer (10%) species. This finding suggests that these plantations experience more stable ecological conditions and a more advanced process of ecological succession.
These results suggest that state plantations possess a higher ecological potential to function as biodiversity refuges or corridors. From a conservation perspective, it is imperative to promote silvicultural and agroforestry practices that limit excessive disturbance and encourage the gradual establishment of slow-growing species with high ecological value, notably legumes [1,13]. The promotion of a heterogeneous plant cover, incorporating non-pioneer species, would enhance the resilience of plantations and maximize their contribution to regional biodiversity conservation [7]. In this context, the rehabilitation of Sankuru's historic rubber plantations in an agroforestry system is imperative not only for biodiversity conservation but also for local economic revitalization. The sustainable cultivation of rubber plants from renewable resources has the potential to restore ecosystem services and enhance carbon storage, even in degraded land [13].

4.6. The Role of Sankuru Rubber Plantations as Secondary Reservoirs of Guinean-Congolese Biodiversity and Ecological Corridors in a Deforestation Context

The flora of the Sankuru rubber plantations is dominated by the proportion of Guineo-Congolese elements in general, irrespective of the plantation type (including primarily Omni-Guineo-Congolese and Bas-Guineo-Congolese phytochories). This robust predominance unequivocally substantiates the assertion that the flora of the Sankuru region is affiliated with the expansive Guineo-Congolese phytogeographical region, a geographical entity distinguished by its remarkable biodiversity and a conspicuously elevated level of endemism. These results align with those of other researchers, who have corroborated the notion that the Guineo-Congolese region encompasses the dense rainforests of Central Africa, a major center of floristic diversity on the African continent [17,24,26]. The observed high degree of floral diversity indicates complex evolutionary processes, including allopatric speciation and periods of ecological stability [44]. These phenomena have facilitated the accumulation and preservation of ancient lineages, contributing to the biodiversity observed in the region [44].
The results of this study underscore the potential of Sankuru's rubber plantations to function as secondary reservoirs of biodiversity and ecological corridors. The floristic composition of these communities, characterized by a preponderance of Guineo-Congolese species, underscores their potential for a pivotal role in the in situ conservation of native flora, particularly in deforestation and habitat fragmentation [13]. To this end, it is imperative to incorporate these plantations into regional conservation strategies. These objectives may encompass the promotion of sustainable agroforestry practices, the establishment of ecological corridors connecting plantations to remaining natural forests, and the dissemination of knowledge regarding the significance of biodiversity among local communities [1,13]. Such an approach would contribute to preserving Sankuru's floristic wealth and maintaining essential ecosystem services for local populations. In this context, Sankuru's rubber plantations offer a distinctive opportunity to harmonize agricultural production and biodiversity conservation [13]. Consequently, integrating these measures into sustainable natural resource management policies is strongly recommended to ensure the sustainability of the region's forest ecosystems [1,13].

4.7. Implications for Biodiversity Conservation

The observation of notable floristic diversity in Sankuru's historic rubber plantations suggests the potential for these plantations to play a crucial role in biodiversity conservation. A diversified rubber plantation, characterised by a substantial presence of indigenous plant species, can function as a habitat for diverse flora and fauna, including endangered species. Integrating agroforestry management practices that promote biodiversity can effectively preserve local ecosystems while ensuring sustainable production. Furthermore, these plantations can function as ecological corridors, facilitating the migration and reproduction of regional species and thereby mitigating the risk of extinction. Implementing agroforestry techniques can reduce the restoration of ecosystem services while ensuring the continued economic productivity of these plantations [51].
As transition zones between agricultural and natural areas in the Salonga National Park landscape [1,2], these plantations can be rehabilitated to improve their ability to restore vegetation cover, prevent soil erosion, and promote natural forest regeneration. The integration of rubber plantations with other woody and non-woody species could thus help strengthen the resilience of local ecosystems to climate change, while minimising the environmental impact of agricultural practices [13]. The active involvement of local communities in decision-making processes concerning the utilisation and management of their natural resources is imperative. Educational programs that focus on raising awareness about the ecological benefits associated with responsible management can reinforce this community commitment. Involving local populations directly in environmental monitoring, reforestation, or agricultural diversification initiatives can foster a sense of ownership, encouraging their involvement [1,13,49].

5. Conclusions

This study underscored the floristic richness and structural characteristics of historical rubber plantations in Sankuru Province, Democratic Republic of Congo. The findings indicate that these plantations are not merely simple monocultures but also significant habitats for various plant diversity. Floristic analysis revealed a variety of associated species that contribute to the balance of these ecosystems, including Plagiostyles africana (2.65%), Barteria nigritana (2.32%), and Hymenocardia ulmoides (0.94%), Funtumia elastica (0.77%), Petersianthus macrocarpus (0.66%), Piptadeniastrum africanum (0.66%), Antiaris toxicaria (0.52%), Symphonia globulifera (0.50%), and Trilepisium madagascariense (0.48%).
The basal area exhibited statistical variation between plantations, with state plantations registering an average of 29.88 m2/ha and farmers' plantations registering an average of 41.37 m2/ha. The distribution of individuals in diameter classes resembles an inverted J-shaped exponential curve. This indicates a regular dynamic, denoting constant regeneration of the rubber tree and its flora over time. However, the structure of plantations is often influenced by cultivation practices and human intervention, requiring particular attention to avoid degradation. Acknowledging these trees' pivotal function in sustaining local biodiversity and augmenting ecosystem services is imperative. In the context of escalating human pressures on natural resources, adopting sustainable management strategies is essential to ensure the conservation of the rubber tree and the flora that coexist within these plantations. This necessitates incorporating agroecological practices, ensuring the harmonious coexistence of agricultural production and environmental preservation.
This study underscores the significance of a holistic approach to ensure that the economic potential offered by rubber plantations is leveraged without compromising their ecological value. The necessity for enhanced collaboration among local farmers, researchers, and policymakers is underscored when formulating sustainable initiatives that aspire to safeguard this distinctive natural heritage while addressing the socio-economic requirements of local communities. This study provides a foundation for further research, particularly regarding the ecological dynamics of Sankuru's historic rubber plantations. It emphasises the pressing need for coordinated efforts to ensure the sustainability of these plantations in the face of contemporary conservation challenges.

Author Contributions

Joël MOBUNDA TIKO., Serge SHAKANYE NDJADI., Olivia Lovanirina RAKOTONDRASOA, and Jean MENIKO TO HULU: Conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis. Joël MOBUNDA TIKO wrote the first draft of the article. Yannick USENI., Jean Pierre AZENGE., Lebon AGANZE., Prince BARAKA LUCUNGU., Maurice KESONGA., Jémima Lydie OBANDZA-AYESSA., Josué MATABARO, and Jean Pierre MATE MWERU were responsible for proofreading the text. Serge SHAKANYE NDJADI, Olivia Lovanirina RAKOTONDRASOA, and Jean MENIKO TO HULU: validation and supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was fully funded by the European Union/ENABEL: Project: DeSIRA Agroforêt COD20006/DA 113220000037.

Acknowledgments

The first author would like to thank the following people for their support during the field survey: Pierre Albert Ngueliele, Albert Angbonga, François Tshamba, Victor Okitana, and Héritier Mpo†. In addition, our gratitude extends to the local populations for their active participation and indispensable contribution to the realization of this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
DBH Diameter at Breast Height
G Enabling basal area
DRC Democratic Republic of the Congo
INERA National Institute for Agronomic Study and Research
PI Pioneer index

References

  1. Tiko, J. M.; Ndjadi, S. S.; Obandza-ayessa, J. L.; Banga, D. B.; Balandi, J. B.; Musavandalo, C. M.; Pierre, J.; Mweru, M.; Michel, B.; Rakotondrasoa, O. L.; et al. Farmers ’ Perception of Ecosystem Services Provided by Historical Rubber Plantations in Sankuru Province , DR Congo. 2025.
  2. De Roover, E. DE. Analyse De La Chaîne De Valeur Hevea Selon La Methode Vca4D, Dans Les Territoires De Lodja Et Lomela, Province Du Sankuru, Rdc, En Vue De La Relance De La Filiere. Https://Matheo.Uliege.Be, 2022, 89.
  3. Gitz, V.; Meybeck, A.; Pinizzotto, S.; Nair, L.; Penot, E.; Baral, H.; Jianchu, X. Sustainable Development of Rubber Plantations: Challenges and Opportunities. XV World For. Congr., 2022, 1–10.
  4. Lewis, S. L.; Edwards, D. P.; Galbraith, D. Increasing Human Dominance of Tropical Forests. Science (80-. )., 2015, 349 (6250), 827–832. [CrossRef]
  5. Li, H.; Aide, T. M.; Ma, Y.; Liu, W.; Cao, M. Demand for Rubber Is Causing the Loss of High Diversity Rain Forest in SW China. Biodivers. Conserv., 2007, 16 (6), 1731–1745. [CrossRef]
  6. Patari, P.; Barma, M. D.; Devi, H. B.; Dasgupta, S. Large Scale Hevea Brasiliensis Plantation Impact on Non-Human Primate and Floral Diversity in Khowai District of Tripura. Environ. Ecol., 2023, 41 (3), 1400–1407. [CrossRef]
  7. Lan, G.; Wu, Z.; Chen, B.; Xie, G. Species Diversity in a Naturally Managed Rubber Plantation in Hainan Island, South China. Trop. Conserv. Sci., 2017, 10. [CrossRef]
  8. Gouyon, A.; de Foresta, H.; Levang, P. Does ‘Jungle Rubber’ Deserve Its Name? An Analysis of Rubber Agroforestry Systems in Southeast Sumatra. Agrofor. Syst., 1993, 22 (3), 181–206. [CrossRef]
  9. Wibawa, G.; Joshi, L.; Van Noordwijk, M.; Penot, E. Rubber Based Agroforestry Systems (RAS) as Alternatives for Rubber Monoculture System. IRRDB Annu. Meet. Int. Conf., 2006, 22.
  10. Beuve-mery, J.; Bioingenieur, M.; Sciences, E. N. Enquête Socio-Économique Dans Les Territoires de Lodja – Lomela – Kole , Province Du Sankuru , RDC Contribuant à La Formulation d ’ Un Projet de Promotion Des Activités Génératrices de Revenu Dans La Zone d ’ Influence Du Parc de La Salonga. 2015.
  11. Zou, R.; Sultan, H.; Muse Muhamed, S.; Khan, M. N.; Pan, J.; Liao, W.; Li, Q.; Cheng, S.; Tian, J.; Cao, Z.; et al. Sustainable Integration of Rubber Plantations within Agroforestry Systems in China: Current Research and Future Directions. Plant Sci. Today, 2024, 11 (3), 421–431. [CrossRef]
  12. Qi, D.; Wu, Z.; Yang, C.; Tao, Z.; Zhao, L.; Zhang, Y.; Fu, Q. Exploration and Practice of Rubber Based Agroforestry Complex Systems in China. Adv. Biosci. Biotechnol., 2023, 14 (12), 479–491. [CrossRef]
  13. Tiko, J. M.; Ndjadi, S. S.; Obandza-ayessa, J. L.; Pierre, J.; Mweru, M.; Michel, B.; Beeckman, H.; Rakotondrasoa, O. L.; Pierre, J.; To, M. Carbon Sequestration Potential in Rubber Plantations : A Complementary Approach to Tropical Forest Conservation Strategies , a Review. 2025, 1–28.
  14. Ngueliele, A. La Problématique de La Gestion Des Déchets Liquides Dans La Province Du Sankuru En République Démocratique Du CONGO.; 2022.
  15. Michel, B. Développement Des Outils et Méthodes d’aide à La Décision Dans Des Aires Protégées (AP) Ciblées Par Le 11ème FED En République Démocratique Du Congo : Etude de Cas Du Parc National de La Salonga. Union Eur. – Délégation en République Démocratique du Congo.Leader Consortium.Member Responsible this Specif. Contract, 2017, No. 4, 2015/369804.
  16. Picard, N. Manuel de Construction d ’ Équations Allométriques Pour l ’ Estimation Du Volume et La Biomasse Des Arbres; 2012.
  17. Lisingo, J. Organisation Spatiale de La Diversité Spécifique d’arbres En Forêt Tropicale Dans Le Bassin Nord-Est de La Cuvette Centrale Congolaise Département d’Ecologie et Gestion Des Ressources Végétales; 2016.
  18. APG IV. An Update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group Classification for the Orders and Families of Flowering Plants: APG IV. Bot. J. Linn. Soc., 2016, 181 (1), 1–20. [CrossRef]
  19. R Core Team. A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing_ [Logiciel]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Practical Graph Mining with R. 2023.
  20. BEINA, D. Diversité Floristique de La Forêt Dense Semi-Décidue de Mbaïki, En République Centrafricaine: Étude Expérimentale de l’impact de Deux Types d’intervention Sylvicole. Univ. Picardie. École Dr. Sci. Santé Unité Dynamiques des Systèmes Anthr. (JE 2532), Thèse Dr. en Biol. santé, 2011, No. Je 2532, 218.
  21. Hamiliton, A. African Forests. In: Tropical Rain Forest Ecosystems: Biogeographical and Ecological Studies (Ecosystems of the World 14B). Leith, H. et Werger, M.J.A. (Eds). Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1989, 4, 155–182.
  22. Senterre, B. Recherches Méthodologiques Pour La Typologie de La Végétation et La Phytogéographie Des Forêts Denses d’Afrique Tropicale. Acta Bot. Gall., 2005, 152 (3), 409–419. [CrossRef]
  23. Tchouto, M. G. P.; De Boer, W. F.; De Wilde, J. J. F. E.; Van der Maesen, L. J. G. Diversity Patterns in the Flora of the Campo-Ma’an Rain Forest, Cameroon: Do Tree Species Tell It All? Biodivers. Conserv., 2006, 15 (4), 1353–1374. [CrossRef]
  24. Nshimba, S. M. Etude Floristique, Écologique et Phytosociologique Des Forêts de l’île Mbiye à Kisangani, R. D. Congo.; 2008.
  25. Lebrun, J.-P. et S. Enumération Des Plantes à Fleurs d’Afrique Tropicale. Conserv. Jard. Bot. la Villes Genève, 1997, 4, 178.
  26. Ndjele, M. . Les Éléments Phytogéographiques Endémiques Dans La Flore Vasculaire Du Zaïre; 1998.
  27. Sonké, B. Etudes Floristiques et Structurales Des Forêts de La Réserve de Faune Du Dja (Cameroun).; 1998.
  28. Collier J. L’hévéa Culture Chez Les Autochtones Du Sankuru.Pdf. Bulletin Agricole du Congo belge Vol. XLVIII, N°6. 1957.
  29. Fox, J. Using the R Commander; Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2017. [CrossRef]
  30. Fox, J., B.-V. Rcmdr : R Commander (2.9-2) [Logiciel]. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Rcmdr/index.html, 2024.
  31. Hawthorne, W. Holes and the Sums of Parts in Ghanaian Forest: Regeneration, Scale and Sustainable Use. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. Awthorne, S. J. Halton, D. W. Walker, B. Sect. B. Biol. Sci., 1996, 104 (5), 75–176.
  32. Shannon, C. E. A Mathematical Theory of Communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J., 1948, 27 (3), 379–423. [CrossRef]
  33. SIMPSON, E. H. Measurement of Diversity. Nature, 1949, 163 (4148), 688–688. [CrossRef]
  34. Pielou, E. C. Shannon’s Formula as a Measure of Specific Diversity: Its Use and Misuse. Am. Nat., 1966, 100 (914), 463–465. [CrossRef]
  35. Hammer, Ø.; Harper, D. A. T.; Ryan, P. D. Past: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontol. Electron., 2001, 4 (1).
  36. Felfili, J. M.; da Silva Júnior, M. C.; Sevilha, A. C.; Fagg, C. W.; Teles Walter, B. M.; Nogueira, P. E.; Rezende, A. V. Diversity, Floristic and Structural Patterns of Cerrado Vegetation in Central Brazil. Plant Ecol. Former. `Vegetatio’, 2004, 175 (1), 37–46. [CrossRef]
  37. Sørensen, T. A Method of Establishing Groups of Equal Amplitude in Plant Sociology Based on Similarity of Species and Its Application to Analyses of the Vegetation on Danish Commons. Biol. Shrifter, 2024, 4 (3), 1–32.
  38. Lokonda, M. Structure Forestière, Propriétés Physico-Chimiques Du Sol et Indices Pédo- Anthracologiques de Perturbations Comparés Entre La Forêt Monodominante à Gilbertiodendron Dewevrei (De Wild.) J. Léonard et La Forêt Mixte Adjacente. Cas de La Réserve Forestière. 2018.
  39. Gillet, J. Mosaïque Forestière Du Nord de La République Du Congo : Origines et Modalités de Gestion Du Congo : Origines et Modalités de Gestion; 2013.
  40. Kasekete, D. K.; Ligot, G.; Mweru, J. P. M.; Drouet, T.; Rousseau, M.; Moango, A.; Bourland, N. Growth, Productivity, Biomass and Carbon Stock in Eucalyptus Saligna and Grevillea Robusta Plantations in North Kivu, Democratic Republic of the Congo. Forests, 2022, 13 (9). [CrossRef]
  41. Doucet, J.-L. L’alliance Délicate de La Gestion Forestière et de La Biodiversité Dans Les Forêts Du Centre de Gabon. Thèse Dr. Fac. Univ. des Sci. Agron. Gembloux, 2003, 323. [CrossRef]
  42. Sonké, B. Forêts de La Reserve Du Dja (Cameroun), Études Floristiques et Structurales. Scr. Bot. Belgica, 2004, 32 (06), 144.
  43. Gonmadje, C. F.; Doumenge, C.; Sunderland, T. C. H.; Balinga, M. P. B.; Sonké, B. Analyse Phytogéographique Des Forêts d’Afrique Centrale: Le Cas Du Massif de Ngovayang (Cameroun). Plant Ecol. Evol., 2012, 145 (2), 152–164. [CrossRef]
  44. Hubau, W.; Lewis, S. L.; Phillips, O. L.; Affum-Baffoe, K.; Beeckman, H.; Cuní-Sanchez, A.; Daniels, A. K.; Ewango, C. E. N.; Fauset, S.; Mukinzi, J. M.; et al. Asynchronous Carbon Sink Saturation in African and Amazonian Tropical Forests. Nature, 2020, 579 (7797), 80–87. [CrossRef]
  45. Blanc, L. Les Formations Forestières Du Parc National de Cat Tien (Viêtnam) : Caractérisation Structurale et Floristique, Étude de La Régénération Naturelle et de La Dynamique Successionnelle.; 1998.
  46. Phillips, O. L.; Martínez, R. V.; Vargas, P. N.; Monteagudo, A. L.; Zans, M. E. C.; Sánchez, W. G.; Cruz, A. P.; Timaná, M.; Yli-Halla, M.; Rose, S. Efficient Plot-Based Floristic Assessment of Tropical Forests Oliver. J. Trop. Ecol., 2003, 19 (6), 629–645. [CrossRef]
  47. Kouob, B, S. Organisation de La Diversité Végétale Dans Les Forêts Matures de Terre Ferme Du Sud-Est Cameroun. In Thèse de doctorat, Université Libre de Bruxelles,; 2009; p 188.
  48. AMANI C. VEGETATION PATTERNS AND ROLE OF EDAPHIC HETEROGENEITY ON PLANT COMMUNITIES IN SEMI-DECIDUOUS FORESTS FROM THE CONGO BASIN. 2011, 2010–2011.
  49. Mobunda, J.; Ndongo, E.; Miafuntila, B. P.; Ebwa, J.; Meniko, J. P. Analyse Socio-Environnementale Des Indicateurs de La Dynamique Du Climat Tels Que Perçus Par La Population Riveraine de La Réserve Forestière de Masako. 2020, 8, 151–157.
  50. Bustillo, E.; Raets, L.; Beeckman, H.; Bourland, N.; Rousseau, M.; Hubau, W.; De Mil, T. Evaluation Du Potentiel Énergétique de La Biomasse Aérienne Ligneuse Des Anciennes Plantations de l’INERA Yangambi. 2018, No. Mai.
  51. Yuan, X.; Yang, B.; Liu, W.; Wu, J.; Li, X. Intercropping with Cash Crops Promotes Sustainability of Rubber Agroforestry: Insights from Litterfall Production and Associated Carbon and Nutrient Fluxes. Eur. J. Agron., 2024, 154 (August 2023), 127071. [CrossRef]
  52. Ayingweu, C. L. Analyse Phytogeographique de La Flore Forestiere Du Secteur Du Kasai Au Congo-Kinshasa. Syst. Geogr. Plants, 2001, 71 (2), 859. [CrossRef]
  53. Leplae, E. La Culture de l’Hévéa Au Congo Belge. Rev. Bot. appliquée d’agriculture Colon., 1926, 6 (56), 204–218. [CrossRef]
  54. Meniko, T. H.; Drazo, A.; Iyongo, L.; Mweru, M.; Akaibe, D.; Bogaert, J. Affiliation Aux Habitats et Mobilité Spécifique de Rongeurs Dans Un Paysage Fragmenté à Masako. Les forêts la Tshopo Écologie , Hist. Compos., 2020, 31.
  55. Joshi L. Jungle Rubber : A Traditional Agroforestry System under Pressure. International Centre for Research in Agroforestry.; 2002.
  56. Awokou, K.; Ganglo, C.; Azontondé, H.; Adjakidje, V.; De Foucault, B. Caractéristiques Structurales et Écologiques Des Phytocénoses Forestières de La Forêt Classée d’itchèdè (Département Du Plateau, Sud-Est Bénin). Sci. Nat., 2009, 6 (2). [CrossRef]
  57. Devineau, J. L. Structure et Dynamique de Quelques Forets Tropophiles de l ’ Ouest Africain (Cote d’ivoire). 2009, No. HAL Id : tel-00359023, 71.
  58. Schnitzer, S. A.; Bongers, F. Increasing Liana Abundance and Biomass in Tropical Forests: Emerging Patterns and Putative Mechanisms. Ecol. Lett., 2011, 14 (4), 397–406. [CrossRef]
  59. Appiah-Badu, K.; Anning, A. K.; Eshun, B.; Mensah, G. Land Use Effects on Tree Species Diversity and Soil Properties of the Awudua Forest, Ghana. Glob. Ecol. Conserv., 2022, 34, e02051. [CrossRef]
  60. Norden, N.; Chazdon, R. L.; Chao, A.; Jiang, Y.; Vílchez-Alvarado, B. Resilience of Tropical Rain Forests: Tree Community Reassembly in Secondary Forests. Ecol. Lett., 2009, 12 (5), 385–394. [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Figure 1. The study area and figure clearly illustrate the province of Sankuru with its two research territories: Lomela to the north and Lodja to the south.
Figure 1. Figure 1. The study area and figure clearly illustrate the province of Sankuru with its two research territories: Lomela to the north and Lodja to the south.
Preprints 158639 g001
Figure 2. The current number of rubber stems per inventory plot for the two Sankuru plantation types.
Figure 2. The current number of rubber stems per inventory plot for the two Sankuru plantation types.
Preprints 158639 g002
Figure 3. Basal area of state and peasant rubber plantations in Sankuru: The box represents the interval in which 50% of basal areas are grouped, and the thick bar inside the box indicates the average basal area; the low bar indicates the minimum basal area, and the high bar the maximum basal area. A Student's t-test of basal area between plantations shows a significant difference, Pr = ˂ 0.05.
Figure 3. Basal area of state and peasant rubber plantations in Sankuru: The box represents the interval in which 50% of basal areas are grouped, and the thick bar inside the box indicates the average basal area; the low bar indicates the minimum basal area, and the high bar the maximum basal area. A Student's t-test of basal area between plantations shows a significant difference, Pr = ˂ 0.05.
Preprints 158639 g003
Figure 4. Abundance or relative density of plant species in state (A) and peasant (B) rubber plantations in Sankuru province.
Figure 4. Abundance or relative density of plant species in state (A) and peasant (B) rubber plantations in Sankuru province.
Preprints 158639 g004
Figure 5. Abundance or relative density of botanical families in state (A) and peasant (B) rubber plantations in Sankuru province.
Figure 5. Abundance or relative density of botanical families in state (A) and peasant (B) rubber plantations in Sankuru province.
Preprints 158639 g005
Figure 6. Relative plant species dominance in state (A) and peasant (B) rubber plantations in Sankuru province.
Figure 6. Relative plant species dominance in state (A) and peasant (B) rubber plantations in Sankuru province.
Preprints 158639 g006
Figure 7. Relative plant species dominance in state (A) and peasant (B) rubber plantations in Sankuru province.
Figure 7. Relative plant species dominance in state (A) and peasant (B) rubber plantations in Sankuru province.
Preprints 158639 g007
Figure 8. Species rarefaction curve as a function of the number of individuals inventoried in rubber plantations in Sankuru province. A: State plantations and B: Peasant plantations.
Figure 8. Species rarefaction curve as a function of the number of individuals inventoried in rubber plantations in Sankuru province. A: State plantations and B: Peasant plantations.
Preprints 158639 g008
Figure 9. Index of floristic species importance values in (a) the state and (b) peasant rubber plantations in Sankuru.
Figure 9. Index of floristic species importance values in (a) the state and (b) peasant rubber plantations in Sankuru.
Preprints 158639 g009
Figure 10. Index of floristic family importance values in (a) the state and (b) peasant rubber plantations in Sankuru.
Figure 10. Index of floristic family importance values in (a) the state and (b) peasant rubber plantations in Sankuru.
Preprints 158639 g010
Figure 12. Diameter structure of trees in (a) the state and (b) peasant rubber plantations in Sankuru. A logarithmic scale was used to better visualize the distribution of tree foot measurements in diameter classes. Classes were created using a 10cm diameter at breast height (dbh) step.
Figure 12. Diameter structure of trees in (a) the state and (b) peasant rubber plantations in Sankuru. A logarithmic scale was used to better visualize the distribution of tree foot measurements in diameter classes. Classes were created using a 10cm diameter at breast height (dbh) step.
Preprints 158639 g012
Table 1. Number of plots and total area surveyed in both plantation types.
Table 1. Number of plots and total area surveyed in both plantation types.
Territories Site Type of plantation Average altitude (m) Number of plots Area (ha)
Lomela Mukumari/INERA Etatique 548,6 40 10
Lodja Shenga Paysanne 556,3 4 1
Lodja Etakamela Paysanne 531,1 16 4
Lodja Tsheko Paysanne 520,4 8 2
Lodja Edjondjo Paysanne 502,2 8 2
Lodja Loketo Paysanne 505,1 4 1
Total 80 20
Table 2. Values of composition indicators and floristic richness of two types of rubber plantations in Sankuru province (p-values are from Student's independent t-test (N1 = N2 = 10), one hectare equals one inventory plot).
Table 2. Values of composition indicators and floristic richness of two types of rubber plantations in Sankuru province (p-values are from Student's independent t-test (N1 = N2 = 10), one hectare equals one inventory plot).
Parameters State plantations Peasant plantations p-value
Total Average per hectare Total Average per hectare
Number of trees 6353 635±84,06 8277 828±144,62 0,00034
Number of species 75 41±7,49 74 28±4,59 0,00034
Number of genera 63 25±2,3 71 27,5±4,86 -
Number of families 27 19±3,06 33 16±1,62 0,00556
Basal area 298,8 29,88±5,8 413,7 41,37±7,57 0,00142
Table 3. List of plant species on Sankuru rubber plantations, ranked in order of decreasing Importance Value Index (IVI) value.
Table 3. List of plant species on Sankuru rubber plantations, ranked in order of decreasing Importance Value Index (IVI) value.
State plantations Peasant plantations
Species IVI (%) Species IVI (%)
Hevea brasiliensis 61,76 Hevea brasiliensis 84,44
Plagiostyles africana 7,17 Plagiostyles africana 2,64
Petersianthus macrocarpus 5,08 Piptadeniastrum africanum 1,58
Hymenocardia ulmoides 4,14 Barteria nigritana 1,56
Piptadeniastrum africanum 2,43 Hymenocardia ulmoides 0,86
Bellucia grossularioides 2,20 Petersianthus macrocarpus 0,79
Caloncoba welwitschii 1,15 Trilepisium madagascariense 0,76
Pterocarpus soyauxii 0,89 Funtumia elastica 0,71
Grewia trinervia 0,87 Antiaris toxicaria 0,53
Gilletiodendron kisantuense 0,86 Pterocarpus soyauxii 0,49
Albizia gummifera 0,84 Symphonia globulifera 0,45
Barteria nigritana 0,69 Celtis tessmannii 0,42
Carapa procera 0,64 Elaeis guineensis 0,37
Trilepisium madagascariense 0,62 Staudtia kamerunensis 0,31
Funtumia elastica 0,59 Coelocaryon preussii 0,27
Albizia adianthifolia 0,53 Canarium schweinfurthii 0,23
Celtis tessmannii 0,51 Pycnanthus angolensis 0,23
Macaranga spinosa 0,48 Treculia africana 0,21
Macaranga monandra 0,45 Trichilia heudelotii 0,19
Treculia africana 0,43 Carapa procera 0,19
Odyendea gabunensis 0,40 Macaranga monandra 0,19
Uapaca heudelotii 0,40 Alstonia boonei 0,17
Voacanga chalotiana 0,39 Allanblackia floribunda 0,17
Antiaris toxicaria 0,37 Albizia gummifera 0,16
Heisteria parvifolia 0,35 Caloncoba welwitschii 0,14
Trichilia prieureana 0,35 Margaritaria discoidea 0,12
Coelocaryon preussii 0,34 Albizia ferruginea 0,10
Cynometra sessiliflora 0,34 Grewia trinervia 0,10
Strombosiopsis tetrandra 0,26 Macaranga spinosa 0,09
Dialium excelsum 0,25 Lannea welwitschii 0,08
Scorodophloeus zenkeri 0,23 Blighia welwitschii 0,08
Parinari excelsa 0,21 Uapaca heudelotii 0,07
Albizia ferruginea 0,21 Ficus exaspera 0,07
Staudtia kamerunensis 0,20 Pachylobus osika 0,07
Pycnanthus angolensis 0,20 Tetrapleura tetraptera 0,07
Garcinia punctata 0,18 Myrianthus arboreus 0,06
Combretum lokele 0,17 Tridesmostemon 0,06
Dialium pachyphyllum 0,15 Xylopia africana 0,06
Cleistanthus caudatus 0,14 Chrysophyllum africana 0,06
Myrianthus arboreus 0,12 Maesopsis eminii 0,06
Trichilia gilgiana 0,12 Morinda lucida 0,05
Microdesmis yafungana 0,12 Entandrophragma cylindricum 0,05
Albizia kalkora 0,12 Milicia excelsa 0,04
Cynometra hankei 0,11 Pentaclethra macrophylla 0,04
Symphonia globulifera 0,11 Tetrorchidium didymostemon 0,04
Prioria oxyphylla 0,11 Raphia sp. 0,04
Xylopia aethiopica 0,10 Cleistanthus caudatus 0,04
Musanga cecropioides 0,10 Polygala parviflora 0,04
Garcinia kola 0,10 Cola gigantea 0,03
Ricinodendron heudelotii 0,10 Odyendea gabunensis 0,03
Julbernardia seretii 0,10 Amphimas pterocarpoides 0,03
Trichilia heudelotii 0,09 Melicope accedens 0,03
Blighia welwitschii 0,09 Diogoa zenkeri 0,03
Entandrophragma candollei 0,09 Tabernaemontana crassa 0,03
Cleistopholis glauca 0,09 Ongokea gore 0,03
Strombosia grandifolia 0,08 Ricinodendron heudelotii 0,03
Turraeanthus africanus 0,08 Anonidium mannii 0,02
Ongokea gore 0,07 Dialium excelsum 0,02
Autranella congolensis 0,07 Aidia micrantha 0,02
Uapaca guineensis 0,06 Grossera macrantha 0,02
Tessmannia africana 0,06 Garcinia epunctata 0,02
Amphimas pterocarpoides 0,05 Leonardoxa romii 0,02
Allanblackia floribunda 0,05 Microdesmis yafungana 0,02
Leplaea laurentii 0,05 Leplaea laurentii 0,02
Zanthoxylum gilletii 0,05 Ceiba pentandra 0,01
Aidia micrantha 0,05 Parinari excelsa 0,01
Pseudospondias microcarpa 0,04 Cynometra hankei 0,01
Alstonia boonei 0,04 Musanga cecropioides 0,01
Copaifera religiosa 0,03 Turraeanthus africanus 0,01
Strombosia pustulata 0,03 Anthonotha fragrans 0,01
Paramacrolobium coeruleum 0,03 Syncephalum dulcificum 0,01
Entandrophragma angolense 0,02 Diospyros crassiflora 0,01
Sterculia dawei 0,01 Entandrophragma angolense 0,01
Irvingia excelsa 0,01 Pachylobus edulis 0,01
Lannea welwitschii 0,01
Total 100 Total 100
Table 4. List of botanical families in Sankuru rubber plantations, ranked in order of decreasing Importance Value Index (IVI) value.
Table 4. List of botanical families in Sankuru rubber plantations, ranked in order of decreasing Importance Value Index (IVI) value.
Plantations étatiques Plantations paysannes
Familles botaniques IVI (%) Familles botaniques IVI (%)
Euphorbiaceae 69,96 Euphorbiaceae 87,45
Fabaceae 7,33 Fabaceae 2,53
Lecythidaceae 5,08 Moraceae 1,61
Phyllanthaceae 4,74 Passifloraceae 1,56
Melastomataceae 2,20 Phyllanthaceae 1,09
Meliaceae 1,44 Apocynaceae 0,90
Moraceae 1,41 Myristicaceae 0,81
Achariaceae 1,15 Lecythidaceae 0,79
Apocynaceae 1,01 Clusiaceae 0,63
Malvaceae 0,88 Meliaceae 0,47
Olacaceae 0,79 Cannabaceae 0,42
Myristicaceae 0,73 Arecaceae 0,41
Passifloraceae 0,69 Burseraceae 0,31
Cannabaceae 0,51 Achariaceae 0,14
Clusiaceae 0,44 Malvaceae 0,14
Simaroubaceae 0,40 Sapotaceae 0,12
Urticaceae 0,22 Annonaceae 0,08
Chrysobalanaceae 0,21 Anacardiaceae 0,08
Annonaceae 0,19 Sapindaceae 0,08
Combretaceae 0,17 Urticaceae 0,07
Pandaceae 0,12 Rubiaceae 0,07
Sapindaceae 0,09 Rhamnaceae 0,06
Sapotaceae 0,07 Olacaceae 0,05
Rutaceae 0,05 Polygalaceae 0,04
Rubiaceae 0,05 Simaroubaceae 0,03
Anacardiaceae 0,05 Rutaceae 0,03
Irvingiaceae 0,01 Pandaceae 0,02
Chrysobalanaceae 0,01
Asteraceae 0,01
Ebenaceae 0,01
Total 100 Total 100
Table 5. Floristic diversity index values for Sankuru rubber plantations (p-value: Student's independent t-test, N1 = N2 = 10).
Table 5. Floristic diversity index values for Sankuru rubber plantations (p-value: Student's independent t-test, N1 = N2 = 10).
Index State plantations Peasant plantations p-value
Total Mean Total Mean
Shannon (H’) 1,87 1,71±0,53 0,93 0,86±0,42 0,001054
Equitabilité (J) 0,43 0,46±0,13 0,22 0,26±0,12 0,001778
Simpson (1-D) 0,60 0,58±0,17 0,28 0,29±0,16 0,001023
Table 7. Phytogeographical distribution spectra of species inventoried in Sankuru rubber plantations. BGC: Lower Guinean Congolese, OGC: Omni-Guinea-Congolese, C: Congolese, FC: Species endemic to the Central Forest, AA: Afro-American, AM: Afro-Malgache, Paleo: Paleotropical, Pan: Pantropical, AT: Afro-Tropical.
Table 7. Phytogeographical distribution spectra of species inventoried in Sankuru rubber plantations. BGC: Lower Guinean Congolese, OGC: Omni-Guinea-Congolese, C: Congolese, FC: Species endemic to the Central Forest, AA: Afro-American, AM: Afro-Malgache, Paleo: Paleotropical, Pan: Pantropical, AT: Afro-Tropical.
Chorologie Plantation étatique Plantation paysanne
N % N %
Guinean-Congolese endemic species
OGC 35 47,30 36 49,32
BGC 25 33,78 20 27,40
FC 3 4,05 4 5,48
C 1 1,35 - -
Sous-total 64 86,48 60 82,2
Wide-ranging species
AA 2 2.70 3 4,11
AM 1 1,35 1 1,37
Paléo - - 1 1,37
Pan - - 1 1,37
Sous-total 1 1,35 3 4,11
Linking species
AT 7 9,46 7 9,59
Sous-total 7 9,46 7 9,59
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated