Submitted:
17 September 2023
Posted:
18 September 2023
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Methods
2.2.1. Village selection and population sampling
2.2.2. Ethnobotanical data collection
2.2.3. Economic value of commonly used miombo woodland NTFPs
2.2.4. Floristic inventories of plant-based NTFP species
2.2.5. Data Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Ethnobotanical knowledge and floristic diversity of woody plant species that serve as NTFP sources in miombo woodlands, as cited by respondents
3.2. Socio-economic values of the main NTFPs collected in each village area
3.3. Availability of woody plant species NTFP sources in both forest habitats
4. Discussion
4.1. Ethnobotanical knowledge and floristic diversity of woody species NTFP sources harvested from miombo woodlands and used by riparian populations in village areas.
4.2. NTFP-harvesting practices used in the two villages, and organs collected
4.3. Socio-economic values of NTFPs collected in miombo woodlands and sold in urban and peri-urban markets
4.4. Availability of woody species as sources of NTFPs in the areas around the two villages: Maksem (degraded forest) and Mwawa (intact forest).
4.5. Implications of the results for the sustainability of miombo woodland ecosystem services
5. Conclusions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- West, P.C.; Narisma, G.T.; Barford, C.C.; Kucharik, C.J.; Foley, J.A. An alternative approach for quantifying climate regulation by ecosystems. Front. Ecol. Envir. 2011, 9, 126–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kouakou, K.A.; Barima, Y.S.S.; Kpangui, B.; Godron, M. Analyse des profils écologiques des produits forestiers non-ligneux dans la région du Haut-Sassandra (Centre-Ouest de la Côte d’Ivoire). Tropicultura 2018, 36, 435–446. [Google Scholar]
- Romabai, W.; Pamei, T.; Manikho, P.F.; Nevidita, L.; Panmei, R. Assessment of economically important tree-based NTFPs in Indo-Burma region, Manipur, India. For. Trees and Livelihoods 2023, 32, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andel, T. Les produits forestiers autres que le bois d’œuvre : La valeur des plantes sauvages. Fondation Agromisa et CTA, Wageningen, 2006, 82p.
- Ingram, V.; Ndoye, O.; Iponga, D.M.; Tieguhong, J.C.; Nasi, R. Les produits forestiers non ligneux : contribution aux économies nationales et stratégies pour une gestion durable. In : de Wasseige C., de Marcken P., Bayol N., Hiol Hiol F., Mayaux Ph., Desclée B., Nasi R., Billand A., Defourny P. et Eba’a Atyi R., (Eds). Les forêts du bassin du Congo–Etat des Forêts 2010. Office des publications de l’Union Européenne. Luxembourg, 2012, pp 137-154.
- Talukdar, N.R.; Choudhury, P.; Barbhuiya, R.A.; Singh, B. Importance of Non-Timber Forest Products (NTFPs) in rural livelihood: A study in Patharia Hills Reserve Forest, northeast India. Trees, Forests and People 2021, 3, 100042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tchatat, M.; N’Doye, O. Etude des produits forestiers non ligneux d’Afrique Centrale : réalités et perspectives. Bois For. Trop. 2006, 289, 27–39. [Google Scholar]
- Moupela, C.; Vermeulen, C.; Daïnou, K.; Doucet, J.-L. Le noisetier d’Afrique (Coula edulis Baill.). Un produit forestier non ligneux méconnu. Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ. 2011, 15, 451–461. [Google Scholar]
- Mujawamariya, G.; Karimov, A.A. Importance of socio-economic factors in the collection of NTFPs: The case of gum Arabic in Kenya. For. Policy Econ. 2014, 42, 24–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zima, G.G.; Mialoundama, F.; Yangakola, J.M.; Kossa, I. Importance des produits forestiers non ligneux médicinaux d’origine végétale et impacts des activités anthropiques sur leur durabilité dans le Sud-Ouest de la République Centrafricaine. Eur. Sci. J. 2018, 14, 202–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biloso, M.A. Valorisation des produits forestiers non ligneux des plateaux de Batéké en périphérie de Kinshasa (R. D. Congo). Acta Bot. Gall. 2009, 156, 311–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Traoré, L. , Hien, M. & Ouédraogo, I. Usages, disponibilité et stratégies endogènes de préservation de Canarium schweinfurthii (Engl.) (Burseraceae) dans la région des Cascades (Burkina Faso) Uses, availability and endogenous conservation strategies of Canarium schweinfurthii (Engl.) (Burseraceae) in the Cascades region (Burkina Faso). Ethnobot. Res. App. 2021, 21, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khoji, M.H.; N’tambwe, N.D.; Malaisse, F.; Salomon, W.; Sambieni, K.R.; Cabala, K.S.; Munyemba, K.F.; Bastin, J.-F.; Bogaert, J.; Useni, S.Y. Quantification and Simulation of Landscape Anthropization around the Mining Agglomerations of Southeastern Katanga (DR Congo) between 1979 and 2090. Land 2022, 11, 850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Badjaré, B. , Kokou, K., Bigou-laré, N., Koumantiga, D. & Akpakouma, A. Étude ethnobotanique d’espèces ligneuses des savanes sèches au Nord-Togo : diversité, usages, importance et vulnérabilité. Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ. 2018, 22, 152–171. [Google Scholar]
- Chidumayo, E.N.; Gumbo, D.J. The environmental impacts of charcoal production in tropical ecosystems of the world: A synthesis. Energy Sustain. Dev. 2013, 17, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Useni, S.Y.; Malaisse, F.; Cabala, K.S.; Munyemba, K.F.; Bogaert, J. Le rayon de déforestation autour de la ville de Lubumbashi (Haut-Katanga, RD Congo) : Synthèse. Tropicultura 2017a, 35, 215-221. http://hdl.handle.net/2268/227664.
- Cabala Kaleba, S.; Useni Sikuzani, Y.; Mwana Yamba, A.; Munyemba Kankumbi, F.; Bogaert, J. Activités anthropiques et dynamique des écosystèmes forestiers dans les zones territoriales de l’Arc Cuprifère Katangais (RD Congo). Tropicultura 2022, 40, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- N’tambwe, N.D.; Khoji, M.H.; Kasongo, K.W.N.B; Sambiéni, K.R.; Malaisse, F.; Useni, S.Y.; Masengo, K.W. & Bogaert, J. Towards an Inclusive Approach to Forest Management: Highlight of the Perception and Participation of Local Communities in the Management of miombo Woodlands around Lubumbashi (Haut-Katanga, D.R. Congo). Forests 2023, 14, 687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biloso, A.; Lejoly, J. Etude de l’exploitation et du marché des produits forestiers non ligneux à Kinshasa. Tropicultura 2006, 24, 183–188. [Google Scholar]
- Ngbolua, K.N.; Ngemale, G.M.; Konzi, N.F.; Masengo, C.A.; Gbolo, Z.B.; Bangata, B.M.; Gbiangbada, N. Utilisation de produits forestiers non ligneux à Gbadolite (District du Nord-Ubangi, Province de l’Equateur, RD Congo): Cas de Cola acuminata (P. Beauv.) Schott & Endl. Malvaceae) et de Piper guineense Schumach. & Thonn.(Piperaceae). Congo Sci. 2014, 2, 61–66. [Google Scholar]
- Mwengi, A.I.; Mpupu, B.; Kawanga, R.; Matondo, M.; Moyene, A.B. Analyse socioéconomique de la cueillette de Gnetum africanum L. dans le secteur de Mateko en République Démocratique du Congo. RAFEA 2019, 2, 27–33. [Google Scholar]
- Malaisse, F. How to live and survive in Zambezian open forest (Miombo Ecoregion). Plecevo 2010, 144, 377–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chuimika, M.M.; Tshomba, K.J.; Bakari, A.S.; Useni, S.Y.; Stefaan, W.; Mazinga, K.M. Causes de la disparition des plantes médicinales du Miombo Katangais (RD Congo) : Cas du commerce non conventionnel de Securidaca longepedunculata Fresen (Polygalaceae). RAFEA 2023, 6, 98–107. [Google Scholar]
- Potapov, P.V.; Turubanova, S.A.; Hansen, M.C.; Adusei, B.; Broich, M.; Altstatt, A.; Mane, L.; Justice, C.O. Quantifying forest cover loss in Democratic Republic of the Congo, 2000–2010, with Landsat ETM+ data. Remote Sens. Envir. 2012, 122, 106–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Munyemba, K.F. Quantification et modélisation de la dynamique paysagère dans la région de Lubumbashi : évaluation de l’impact écologique des dépositions issues de la pyrométallurgie. Thèse de doctorat, Université de Lubumbashi, Lubumbashi, République Démocratique du Congo, 2010, 284p.
- Schneibel, A.; Stellmes, M.; Röder, A.; Finckh, M.; Revermann, R.; Frantz, D.; Hill, J. Evaluating the trade-off between food and timber resulting from the conversion of Miombo forests to agricultural land in Angola using multi-temporal Landsat data. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 548, 390–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kazungu, M.; Velasco, R.F.; Zhunusova, E.; Lippe, M.; Kabwe, G.; Gumbo, D.J.; Guenter, S. Effects of household-level attributes and agricultural land-use on deforestation patterns along a forest transition gradient in the Miombo landscapes, Zambia. Ecol. Econ. 2021, 186, 107070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mwitwa, J.; German, L.; Muimba-Kankolongo, A.; Puntondewo, A. Governance and sustainability challenges in landscape shaped by mining: miningforestry linkages and impacts in the copper belt of Zambia and the DR Congo. For. Policy Econ. 2012, 25, 19–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vranken, I.; Amisi, Y.M.; Munyemba, F.K.; Bamba, I.; Veroustraete, F.; Visser, M.; Bogaert, J. The spatial footprint of the Non-ferrous mining industry in Lubumbashi. Tropicultura 2013, 31, 20–27. [Google Scholar]
- Morley, J.; Buchanan, G.; Mitchard, E.T.; Keane, A. Quasi-experimental analysis of new mining developments as a driver of deforestation in Zambia. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 18252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kabulu, D.J.-P.; Vranken, I.; Bastin, J.-F.; Malaisse, F.; Nyembwe, S.; Useni, S.Y.; Ngongo, L.M.; Bogaert, J. Approvisionnement en charbon de bois des ménages Lushois: Quantité, alternatives et conséquences. In : Anthropisation des Paysages Katangais; Bogaert, J., Colinet, G., Mahy, G., Eds.; Les Presses Universitaires de Liège: Liège, Belgium, 2018; pp. 297–311. [Google Scholar]
- Kalaba, F.K.; Quinn, C.H.; Dougill, A.J.; Vinya, R. Floristic composition, species diversity and carbon storage in charcoal and agriculture fallows and management implications in Miombo woodlands of Zambia. For. Ecol. Manage. 2013, 304, 99–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kouakou, K.A. , Barima, Y.S.S., Zanh, G.G., Traoré, K. & Bogaert, J. Inventaire et disponibilité des produits forestiers non-ligneux utilisés par les popuations riveraines de la Forêt classée du Haut-Sassandra après la période de conflits armés en Côte d’Ivoire. Tropicultura 2017, 35, 121–136. [Google Scholar]
- Useni, S.Y.; Muteya, H.K.; Bogaert, J. Miombo woodland, an ecosystem at risk of disappearance in the Lufira Biosphere Reserve (Upper Katanga, DR Congo)? A 39-years analysis based on Landsat images. Global Ecol. Conserv. 2020a, 24, e01333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mittermeier, R.A.; Mittermeier, C.G.; Brooks, T.M.; Pilgrim, J.D.; Konstant, W.R.; da Fonseca, G.A.B.; Kormos, C. Wilderness and biodiversity conservation. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 2003, 100, 10309–10313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Assongba, Y.F.; Djègo, G.J.; Sinsin, B. Distribution des habitats de Dialium guineense (willd) (Fabaceae : Caesalpinioideae) dans les phytodistricts Est du Sud-Bénin. Bull. sci. Inst. natl. environ. conserv. nat. 2013, 12, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
- Tchoumba, B. République démocratique du Congo. Le projet pilote REED de conservation international : une production inédite de la disney. WRM et Réseau Cref., 2011, 37 p.
- Dossou, M.E. , Houessou, G.L., Lougbégnon, O.T., Tenté, A.H.B. & Codjia, J.T.C. Etude ethnobotanique des ressources forestières ligneuses de la forêt marécageuse d’Agonvè et terroirs connexes au Bénin. Tropicultura 2012, 30, 41–48. [Google Scholar]
- Kouakou, K. Disponibilité et vulnérabilité des espèces sources de produits forestiers non ligneux d’origine végétale de la forêt classée du Haut-Sassandra et sa périphérie après la décennie de crise au Centre-Ouest de la Côte d’Ivoire. Thèse de doctorat, Université de Jean LOROUGNON GUEDE, Côte d’Ivoire, 2019, 188 p.
- Kalombo, K.D. Évolution des éléments du climat en RDC : Stratégies d'adaptation des communautés de base, face aux événements climatiques de plus en plus fréquents. Éditions universitaires européennes, 2016, 220p.
- Kalombo, K.D. Caractérisation de la répartition temporelle des précipitations à Lubumbashi (Sud-Est de la RDC) sur la période 1970-2014. XXIII Colloque de l’Association Internationale de Climatologie, Liege, 2015, 531-536.
- Ngongo, M. L., Van Ranst, E., Baert, G., Kasongo, E. L., Verdoodt, A., Mujinya, B. B., & Mukalay, J. M. Guide des sols en République Démocratique du Congo, tome I : étude et gestion. Lubumbashi, République Démocratique du Congo, 2009, 260p.
- Malaisse, F.; Bogaert, J.; Boisson, S.; Sikuzani, Y.U. La végétation naturelle d’Élisabethville (actuellement Lubumbashi) au début et au milieu du XXième siècle. Geo-Eco-Trop 2021, 45, 41–51. [Google Scholar]
- Munyemba, K.F.; Bogaert, J. Anthropisation et dynamique spatiotemporelle de l’occupation du sol dans la région de Lubumbashi entre 1956 et 2009. E-revue Unilu 2014, 1, 3–23. [Google Scholar]
- Cadre Intégré de Classification de la sécurité Alimentaire (IPC). Analyse de l’Insécurité Alimentaire Aiguë er de la Malnutrition aiguë de l’IPC; IPC: Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Useni, S.Y.; Boisson, S.; Cabala, K.S.; Khonde, C.N.; Malaisse, F.; Halleux, J.-M.; Bogaert, J.; Kankumbi, F.M. Dynamique de l’occupation du sol autour des sites miniers le long du gradient urbain-rural de la ville de Lubumbashi, RD Congo. Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ. 2020b, 24, 1-14. https://popups.uliege.be/1780-4507/index.php?id=18306.
- Johnston, L.G.; Sabin, K. Échantillonnage déterminé selon les répondants pour les populations difficiles à joindre. Methodol. Innovations 2010, 5, 38.2–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marpsat, M.; Razafindratsima, N. Les méthodes d’enquêtes auprès des populations difficiles à joindre : Introduction au numéro spécial. Methodol. Innov. 2010, 5, 3–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dubois, É.; Michaux, E. Étalonnages à l’aide d’enquêtes de conjoncture : de nouveaux résultats. Econ. Previ. 2006, 172, 11–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, P., & Allen, Q. Field guide to the trees and shrubs of the miombo woodlands. Royal Botanic Gardens, 2004, 176p.
- Meerts, P. J., & Hasson, M. Arbres et arbustes du Haut-Katanga. ULB-DIPOT, 2016, 386 p. http://hdl.handle.net/2013/ULB-DIPOT:oai:dipot.ulb.ac.be:2013/242504.
- Vollesen, K. & Merrett, L. A photo rich field guide to the (wetter) Zambian Miombo woodland: Based on Plants from the Mutinondo Wilderness Area, Northern Zambia (2-volumes set). 2020, 1200p.
- Aparicio, H.; Hedberg, I.; Bandeira, S.; Ghorbani, A. Ethnobotanical study of medicinal and edible plants used in Nhamacoa area, Manica Province–Mozambique. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2021, 139, 318–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bruschi, P.; Mancini, M.; Mattioli, E.; Morganti, M.; Signorini, M.A. Traditional uses of plants in a rural community of Mozambique and possible links with Miombodegradation and harvesting sustainability. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2014, 10, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ameja, L.G.; Ribeiro, N.; Sitoe, A.A.; Guillot, B. Regeneration and Restoration Status of Miombo Woodland Following Land Use Land Cover Changes at the Buffer Zone of Gile National Park, Central Mozambique. Trees, Forests and People 2022, 9, 100290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thiombiano, A., Glele kakaï, R., Bayen, P., Boussim, J.I. & Mahamane, A. Méthodes et dispositifs d’inventaires forestiers en Afrique de l’Ouest : état des lieux et propositions pour une harmonisation. Annales des Sciences Agronomiques, Université de Ouagadougou, Spécial Projet Undesert-UE, 2016, 15-31.
- Albatineh, A.N.; Niewiadomska-Bugaj, M. Correcting Jaccard and other similarity indices for chance agreement in cluster analysis. Adv. Data Anal. Classif. 2011, 5, 179–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kacholi, D.S.; Mvungi, H.A. Ethnomedicinal survey of antidiarrheal plants of the Nyamwezi people of Nsenda ward in Urambo District, central western Tanzania. Ethnobot. Res. Appl. 2022, 24, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adomou, A.C.; Yedomonhan, H.; Djossa, B.; Legba, S.I.; Oumorou, M.; Akoegninou, A. Étude éthnobotanique des plantes médicinales vendues dans le marché d’Abomey-Calavi au Bénin. Int. J. chem. biol. Sci. 2012, 6, 745–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rakotoarimanana, V.; Gondard, H.; Ranaivoarivelo, N.; Carriere, S. Influence du pâturage sur la diversité floristique, la production et la qualité fourragères d’une savane des Hautes Terres malgaches (région de Fianarantsoa). Sécheresse 2008, 19, 39–46. [Google Scholar]
- Thies, C.,Rosoman, G., Cotter, J. & Madden, S. Intact Forest Landscapes, Why it is crucial to protect them from industrial exploitation. Rapport technique, Greenpeace International, 2011. http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/publications.
- Shackleton, S.E. & Shackleton, C.M. & Cousins, B. Re-valuing the Communal Lands of Southern Africa: New Understandings of Rural Livelihoods. London. Overseas Development Institute: Natural perspective ressources, 2000, 4p.
- Lawin, I.F.; Laleye, O.A.F.; Agbani, O.P. Vulnérabilité et stratégies endogènes de conservation des plantes utilisées dans le traitement du diabète dans les communes de Glazoué et Savè au Centre-Bénin. Int. J. Bio. Chem. Sci. 2016, 10, 1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tonga, K.P.; Zapfack, L.; Kabelong, B.L.P.R.; Endamana, D. Disponibilité des produits forestiers non ligneux fondamentaux à la périphérie du Parc national de Lobeke. Vertigo 2017, 17, 18770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ambrose-Oji, B. The contribution of NTFPs to the livelihoods of the “forest poor”: evidence from the tropical forest zone of south-west Cameroon. Int. Forest. Rev. 2003, 5, 106–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mpanda, M.M.; Khoji, M.H.; N’Tambwe, N.D.; Sambieni, R.K.; Malaisse, F.; Cabala, K.S.; Bogaert, J.; Useni, S.Y. Uncontrolled Exploitation of Pterocarpus tinctorius Welw. and Associated Landscape Dynamics in the Kasenga Territory: Case of the Rural Area of Kasomeno (DR Congo). Land 2022, 11, 1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Useni, S.Y.; Cabala, K.S.; Nkuku, K.C.; Amisi, M.Y.; Malaisse, F.; Bogaert, J.; Munyemba, K.F. Vingt-cinq ans de monitoring de la dynamique spatiale des espaces verts en réponse á ('urbanisation dans les communes de la ville de Lubumbashi (Haut-Katanga, RD Congo). Tropicultura 2017b, 35, 300-311. https://hdl.handle.net/2268/227664.
- Useni, S.Y., André, M., Mahy, G., Cabala, K.S., Malaisse, F., Munyemba, K.F. & Bogaert, J. Interprétation paysagère du processus d’urbanisation à Lubumbashi: Dynamique de la structure spatiale et suivi des indicateurs écologiques entre 2002 et 2008. In : Anthropisation des Paysages Katangais ; Bogaert, J., Colinet, G., Mahy, G., Eds.; Les Presses Universitaires de Liège-Agronomie : Gembloux, Belgium, 2018a, pp. 281–296.
- Useni Sikuzani, Y.; Sambiéni Kouagou, R.; Maréchal, J.; Ilunga wa Ilunga, E.; Malaisse, F.; Bogaert, J.; Munyemba Kankumbi, F. Changes in the spatial pattern and ecological functionalities of green spaces in Lubumbashi (the Democratic Republic of Congo) in relation with the degree of urbanization. Trop. Conserv. Sci. 2018b, 11, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vinya, R., Syampungani, S., Kasumu, E.C., Monde, C. & Kasubika, R. Preliminary Study on the Drivers of Deforestation and Potential for REDD+ in Zambia. A consultancy report prepared for Forestry Department and FAO under the national UN-REDD+ Programme Ministry of Lands & Natural Resources. Lusaka, Zambia, 2011, 65p.
- Bikoue, C., Essomba, H., Tabuna, H., Degrande, A., Tchoundjeu, Z., & Walter, S. Gestion des ressources naturelles fournissant les produits forestiers non ligneux alimentaires en Afrique Centrale. Produits forestiers non ligneux. Document de travail (FAO), 2007, 50p.
- Michon, G.; H De Foresta, P. Levang, and F. Verdeaux. Domestic forests: a new paradigm for integrating local communities’ forestry into tropical forest science. Ecol. Soc. 2007, 12, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tchoundjeu, Z.; Duguma, B.; Tiencheu, M.L.; Ngo-Mpeck, M.L. Domestication des arbres indigènes agroforestiers : la stratégie du CIRAF dans les régions tropicales humides d’Afrique centrale et d’Afrique de l’Ouest. In : Sunderland, T., Clark, L.E. & Vantomme, P. (eds) les produits forestiers non ligneux de l’Afrique centrale. Recherches actuelles et perspectives pour la conservation et le développement, 2000, 171-180.
- Akinnifesi, F.K., Kwesiga, F.R., Mhango, J., Mkonda, A., Chilanga, T. & Swai, R. Domesticating priority miombo indigenous fruit trees as a promising livelihood option for small-holder farmers in southern africa. 632: XXVI International Horticultural Congress: Citrus and Other Subtropical and Tropical Fruit Crops: Issues, Advances and Opportunities, 2004. I. [CrossRef]
- Pelletier, J.; Paquette, A.; Mbindo, K.; Zimba, N.; Siampale, A.; Chendauka, B.; Siangulube, F.; Roberts, J.W. Carbon sink despite large deforestation in African tropical dry forests (miombo woodlands). Environ. Res. Lett. 2018, 13, 094017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pelletier, J.; Chidumayo, E.; Trainor, A.; Siampale, A.; Mbindo, K. Distribution of tree species with high economic and livelihood value for Zambia. For. Ecol. Manage. 2019, 441, 280–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Doggart, N.; Morgan-Brown, T.; Lyimo, E.; Mbilinyi, B.; Meshack, C.K.; Sallu, S.M.; Spracklen, D.V. Agriculture is the main driver of deforestation in Tanzania. Environ. Res. Lett. 2020, 15, 034028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meng, J.; Lu, Y.; Lei, X.; Liu, G. Structure and floristics of tropical forests and their implications for restoration of degraded forests of China’s Hainan Island. Trop. Ecol. 2011, 52, 177–191. [Google Scholar]
- Vermeulen, C.; Schippers, C.; Julve, C.; Ntoune, M.; Bracke, C.; Doucet, J.-L. Enjeux méthodologiques autour des produits forestiers non ligneux dans le cadre de la certification en Afrique Centrale. Bois For. Trop. 2009, 300, 69–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramade, F. Eléments d’écologie. Ecologie appliquée : action de l’homme sur la biosphère. 7e édition, Dunod, France, 2012, 791p.
- Reyniers, C. Agroforesterie et déforestation en République démocratique du Congo. Miracle ou mirage environnemental ? Mondes dév. 2019, 187, 113–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luoga, E.J.; Witkowski, E.T.F.; Balkwill, K. Harvested and standing wood stocks in protected and communal miombo woodlands of eastern Tanzania. For Ecol Manage. 2002, 164, 15–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- UICN-Burkina Faso. Certification des PFNL au Burkina Faso : Manuel simplifié à l’usage des Organisations Communautaires de Base (OCB). Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso : UICN, 2015, 32 p.
- Bodin, B., Ravilious, C., Mant, R, Bastianelli, C. Les synergies entre la REDD+ et les objectifs d’Aichi de la Convention sur la Diversité Biologique en Afrique Centrale - L’apport de l’analyse spatiale pour la planification conjointe de deux engagements internationaux sur les forêts. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK, 2014.


| Village areas | Latitude | Longitude | Forest status | Accessibility | Surveyed (%) | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M | F | ||||||
| Maksem (n=50) | S 11,32998 | E 27,83755 | Degraded | Close/very good | 66 | 34 | 100 |
| Mwawa (n=50) | S 12,05379 | E 27,59325 | Nearly intact | far/bad | 70 | 30 | 100 |
| N° | Species | Families | Cf (%) n=50 | Organs | Harvesting practices | Mains uses | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mak | Mwa | Mak | Mwa | Mak | Mwa | Mak | Mwa | |||
| 1 | Acacia polyacantha Wild. | Fabaceae | 2 | .- | Ba, Ro | - | Pe, Di | - | Tm | - |
| 2 | Acacia sieberiana DC | Fabaceae | 2 | 2 | Ro | Ro | Di | Di | Tm | Tr |
| 3 | Afzelia quanzensis Welw. | Fabaceae | 14 | 4 | St, Le | St | Sl, Pl | Sl | Ha, Bu, Tr | Ha |
| 4 | Albizia adianthifolia (Schumach.) W. Wight | Fabaceae | 10 | 40 | Ba, Ro, St | Ba, Ro, St | Pe, Di, Sl | Pe, Di, Sl | Ha, Tm | Ha, Bu, Tm |
| 5 | Albizia antunesiana Harms | Fabaceae | 50 | 22 | Ro, St | Ba, Ro, St | Di, Sl | Pe, Di, Sl | Ha, Bu, Tm | Ha, Bu, Tm |
| 6 | Albizia versicolor Welw. Ex Oliv. | Fabaceae | 18 | - | Ro, St | - | Di, Sl | - | Ha, Tm | - |
| 7 | Anisophyllea boehmii Engl. | Anisophilleaceae | 46 | 54 | Ba, Fr | Ba, Fr, St | Di, Pl, Sl | Pe, Pl, Sl | Fo, Tm | Fo, Bu, Tm |
| 8 | Annona senegalensis Pers. | Annonaceae | 10 | 16 | St | Ba, Fr, Ro, St | Sl | Pe, Pl, Di, Sl | Ha, Bu, Tm | Fo, Ha, Bu, Tm |
| 9 | Bobgunnia madagascariensis (Desv.) J.H. Kirkbr. & Wiersama | Fabaceae | 16 | 42 | Ba, Ro, St | Ba, Ro, St | Pe, Di, Sl | Pe, Di, Sl | Bu, Tr, Tm | Ha, Bu, Tm |
| 10 | Brachystegia boehmii Taub. | Fabaceae | 10 | 24 | Ba, St | Ba, St | Pe, Sl | Pe, Sl | Bu | Ha, Bu, Tm |
| 11 | Brachystegia floribunda Benth. | Fabaceae | - | 2 | - | Ba | - | Pe | - | Bu |
| 12 | Brachystegia spiciformis Benth. | Fabaceae | 20 | 16 | Ro, St | Ba, St | Di, Sl | Pe, Sl | Ha, Bu, Tm | Bu, Tm |
| 13 | Cassia abbreviata Oliv. | Fabaceae | 28 | 4 | Ba, Ro | Ba, Ro | Pe, Di | Pe, Di | Tm | Tm |
| 14 | Combretum molle Engl. & Diels | Combretaceae | 8 | 8 | Ba, Ro, St | Ba, Ro, St | Pe, Di, Sl | Pe, Di, Sl | Ha, Bu, Tm | Ha, Bu, Tm |
| 15 | Diospyros mespiliformis Hochst. Ex A. DC. | Ebenaceae | - | 2 | - | Ba, Ro | - | Pe, Di | - | Tm |
| 16 | Diplorhynchus condylocarpon (Müll. Arg.) Pichon | Apocynaceae | 20 | 6 | Ba, Ro, St | Ba, Ro | Pe, Di, Sl | Pe, Di | Ha, Bu, Tm | Tm |
| 17 | Entandrophragma delevoyi De Wild. | Meliaceae | - | 2 | - | Ba, Ro | - | Pe, Di | - | Tr |
| 18 | Erythrina abyssinica Lam. Ex DC. | Fabaceae | - | 14 | - | Ba, Ro, St | - | Pe, Di, Sl | - | Ha, Tm |
| 19 | Erythrophleum africanum (Welw. Ex Benth.) Harms | Fabaceae | 2 | 10 | Ba | St | Pe | Sl | Bu | Ha, Bu |
| 20 | Faurea saligna Harv. | Proteaceae | 4 | 2 | St | St | Sl | Sl | Bu | Bu |
| 21 | Ficus stuhlmannii Warb. | Moraceae | 2 | 1 | Le | St | Pl | Sl | Tr | Tr |
| 22 | Ficus sycomorus L. | Moraceae | 10 | 2 | Ba, St | St | Pe, Sl | Sl | Ha, Tr, Tm | Ha |
| 23 | Ficus sp | Moraceae | - | 2 | - | St | - | Sl | - | Bu |
| 24 | Garcinia huillensis Welw. | Clusiaceae | 4 | 18 | Fr | Ba, Ro | Pl | Pe, Di | Fo | Fo, Tm |
| 25 | Hexalobus monopetalus (A. Rich.) Engl. & Diels | Annonaceae | 2 | - | Fr | - | Pl | - | Fo | - |
| 26 | Hymenocardia acida Tul. | Phyllanthaceae | 10 | 4 | Ba, Ro, St | Ro, St | Pe, Di, Sl | Di, Sl | Ha, Tr, Tm | Bu, Tm |
| 27 | Isoberlinia spp | Fabaceae | 56 | 20 | Ba, St | Ba, Ro, St | Pe, Sl | Pe, Di, Sl | Ha, Bu, Tm | Ha, Bu, Tm |
| 28 | Julbernardia globiflora (Benth.) Troupin | Fabaceae | 8 | - | Ba, St | - | Pe, Sl | - | Bu | - |
| 29 | Julbernardia paniculata (Benth.) Troupin | Fabaceae | 30 | 22 | Ba, St | Ba, Ro, St | Pe, Sl | Pe, Di, Sl | Ha, Bu, Tm | Ha, Bu, Tm |
| 30 | Landolphia kirkii Dyer ex Hook. F. | Apocynaceae | 2 | 12 | Ro | Fr | Di | Pl | Tm | Fo |
| 31 | Lannea discolor (Sond.) Angl. | Anacardiaceae | 6 | 4 | Le, St | Ro, St | Pl, Sl | Di, Sl | Ha, Tr, Tm | Ha, Tr, Tm |
| 32 | Marquesia macroura Gilg | Dipterocarpaceae | 4 | 6 | St | St | Sl | Sl | Ha, Bu | Ha, Bu |
| 33 | Monotes katangensis (De Wild.) De Wild. | Dipterocarpaceae | - | 2 | - | St | - | Sl | - | Bu |
| 34 | Ochna schweinfurthiana F. Hoffm. | Ochnaceae | 2 | - | Ba | - | Pe | - | Tm | - |
| 35 | Olax obtusifolia De Wild. | Olacaceae | - | 2 | - | St | - | Sl | - | Bu |
| 36 | Parinari curatellifolia Planch. Ex Benth. | Chrysobalanaceae | 26 | 52 | Ba, Fr, Ro, St | Ba, Fr, Ro, St | Pe, Pl, Di, Sl | Pe, Pl, Di, Sl | Fo, Bu, Tm | Fo, Bu, Tm |
| 37 | Pericopsis angolensis (Boulanger) Meeuwen | Fabaceae | 22 | 30 | Ro, St | Ro, St | Di, Sl | Di, Sl | Ha, Bu, Tr, Tm | Ha, Bu, Tm |
| 38 | Piliostigma thonningii (Schumach.) Milne-Redh. | Fabaceae | 12 | 2 | Ba, Ro | Ba, Ro | Pe, Sl | Pe, Di | Bu,Tr, Tm | Bu,Tm |
| 39 | Pseudolachnostylis maprouneifolia Pax | Phyllanthaceae | - | 4 | - | Ba, St | - | Pe, Sl | - | Bu, Tm |
| 40 | Psorospermum febrifugum Spach | Hypericaceae | - | 2 | - | Ro | - | Di | - | Tm |
| 41 | Pterocarpus angolensis DC. | Fabaceae | 46 | 18 | Ba, Ro, St | St | Pe, Di, Sl | Sl | Ha, Bu, Cu, Tm | Ha, Bu |
| 42 | Pterocarpus tinctorius Welw. | Fabaceae | 60 | 4 | Ba, Ro, St | St | Pe, Di, Sl | Sl | Ha, Bu, Tm | Ha, Bu |
| 43 | Rothmannia engleriana (K. Schum.) Keay | Rubiaceae | 2 | - | Le | - | Pl | - | Tr | - |
| 44 | Securidaca longepedunculata Fresen. | Polygalaceae | 16 | 6 | Le, Ro | Ro | Pl, Di | Di | Tr, Tm | Tm |
| 45 | Sterculia quinqueloba (Garcke) K. Schum. | Malvaceae | 26 | 2 | Ba, Le, Ro, St | Ba, Le | Pe, Pl, Di, Sl | Pe, Pl | Bu, Tr, Tm | Bu |
| 46 | Strychnos innocua Delile | Loganiaceae | - | 6 | - | Fr | - | Pl | - | Fo |
| 47 | Strychnos pungens Soler. | Loganiaceae | - | 2 | - | Ro | - | Di | - | Tm |
| 48 | Strychnos spinosa Lam. | Loganiaceae | 12 | 6 | Fr, Ro | Fr, Ro | Pl, Di | Pl, Di | Fo, Tm | Fo, Tm |
| 49 | Strychnos cocculoides Baker | Loganiaceae | 48 | 60 | Fr, Ro | Fr, Ro | Pl, Di | Pl, Di | Fo, Tm | Fo, Tm |
| 50 | Strychnos sp | Loganiaceae | 2 | 4 | Ro | Ro | Di | Di | Tm | Tm |
| 51 | Syzygium cordatum Hochst. Ex C. Krauss | Myrtaceae | - | 2 | - | Fr | - | Pl | - | Fo |
| 52 | Syzygium guineense DC. | Myrtaceae | - | 6 | - | Fr | - | Pl, Sl | - | Tm |
| 53 | Terminalia mollis M.A. Lawson | Combretaceae | 24 | 32 | Ba, Ro, St | Ba, Ro | Pe, Di, Sl | Pe, Di | Ha, Bu, Tm | Tm |
| 54 | Thespesia garckeana F. Hoffm. | Malvaceae | 8 | 22 | Fr | Fr, St | Pl | Pl, Sl | Fo | Fo, Ha |
| 55 | Uapaca kirkiana Müll.Arg. | Phyllanthaceae | 46 | 68 | Fr, Ro, St | Fr, St | Pl, Di, Sl | Pl, Sl | Fo, Bu, Tm | Fo, Ha, Bu |
| 56 | Uapaca nitida Müll.Arg. | Phyllanthaceae | 2 | 8 | Fr, St | Fr, St | Pl, Sl | Pl, Sl | Fo, Bu | Fo, Bu |
| 57 | Uapaca pilosa Hutch. | Phyllanthaceae | - | 6 | - | Fr | - | Pl | - | Fo |
| 58 | Ximenia sp | Olacaceae | 2 | 2 | St | St | Sl | Sl | Ha | Bu |
| 59 | Zanha africana (Radlk.) Exell | Fabaceae | 2 | - | Ro | - | Di | - | Tm | - |
| 60 | Zanthoxylum chalybeum Engl. | Fabaceae | 22 | 28 | Ro | Ba, Ro, St | Di | Pe, Di, Sl | Tm | Ha, Tm |
| N° | Species | Village areas (Cf%) ; n=50 | Economic value (USD) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maksem | Mwawa | |||
| Food use | ||||
| 1 | A. boehmii | 21 | 27 | 2.5/kg |
| 2 | S. cocculoides | 23 | 28 | 0.5/kg |
| 3 | U. kirkiana | 22 | 31 | 0.57/kg |
| Handicraft use | ||||
| 4 | A. adianthifolia | - | 12 | 1.88/kg of Handle or 0.84/kg of pestle |
| 5 | A. antunesiana | 16 | 8 | 1.88/kg of Handle or 0.84/kg of pestle |
| 6 | A. versicolor | 9 | - | 1.88/Handle |
| 7 | A. senegalensis | - | 5 | 1.88/Handle |
| 8 | B. madagascariensis | - | 12 | 1.88/kg (Handle) or 0.84/kg (pestle) |
| 9 | Isoberlinia spp | 13 | 4 | 1.43 -14.58/kg of art |
| 10 | P. angolensis | - | 5 | 1.43 -14.58/kg of art |
| 11 | P. angolensis | 8 | 7 | 1.43 -14.58/kg of art |
| 12 | P. tinctorius | 12 | - | 1.43 -14.58/kg of art |
| Use in hut building | ||||
| 13 | A. antunesiana | 12 | - | 0.83/kg of stem |
| 14 | B. madagascariensis | - | 9 | 0.83/kg of stem |
| 15 | B. boehmii | - | 11 | 0.83/kg of stem |
| 16 | B. spiciformis | - | 7 | 0.83/kg of stem |
| 17 | E. africanum | - | 4 | 0.83/kg of stem |
| 18 | Isoberlinia spp | 26 | 4 | 0.83/kg of stem |
| 19 | J. paniculata | 10 | 7 | 0.83/kg of stem |
| 20 | P. angolensis | - | 11 | 0.83/kg of stem |
| 21 | P. angolensis | 20 | - | 0.83/kg of stem |
| 22 | P. tinctorius | 24 | - | 0.83/kg of stem |
| 23 | U. kirkiana | - | 12 | 0.83/kg of stem |
| 24 | U. nitida | - | 4 | 0.83/kg of stem |
| Use in traditional medicine | ||||
| 25 | B. madagascariensis | - | 12 | 9.25/kg of Root or Bark |
| 26 | C. abbreviata Oliv. | 14 | - | 9.25/kg of Root |
| 27 | S. longepedunculata | 7 | - | 9.25/kg of Root |
| 28 | T. mollis | 10 | 16 | 9.25/kg of Root or Bark |
| 29 | Z. chalybeum | 11 | 12 | 9.25/kg of Root |
| N° | Species | Families | Density /ha | Relative Density (%) | Frequency | Relative Frequency (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mak | Mwa | Mak | Mwa | Mak | Mwa | Mak | Mwa | |||||
| 1 | A. polyacantha | Fabaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| 2 | A. sieberiana | Fabaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| 3 | A. quanzensis | Fabaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| 4 | A. adianthifolia | Fabaceae | 4.17 | 17.5 | 1.1 | 3.41 | 0.25 | 0.83 | 2.33 | 5.49 | ||
| 5 | A. antunesiana | Fabaceae | 10.83 | 11.67 | 2.85 | 2.28 | 0.5 | 0.58 | 4.65 | 3.85 | ||
| 6 | A. versicolor | Fabaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| 7 | A. boehmii | Anisophylleaceae | 2.5 | 6.67 | 0.66 | 1.3 | 0.08 | 0.42 | 0.78 | 2.75 | ||
| 8 | A. senegalensis | Annonaceae | 1.7 | - | 0.43 | - | 0.17 | - | 1.55 | - | ||
| 9 | B. madagascariensis | Fabaceae | 1.7 | 5.83 | 0.43 | 1.14 | 0.17 | 0.42 | 1.55 | 2.75 | ||
| 10 | B. boehmii | Fabaceae | 2.5 | - | 0.65 | - | 0.17 | - | 1.55 | - | ||
| 11 | B. floribunda | Fabaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| 12 | B. spiciformis | Fabaceae | 15.83 | 107.5 | 4.17 | 20.98 | 0.5 | 1 | 4.65 | 6.59 | ||
| 13 | C. abbreviata | Fabaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| 14 | C. molle | Combetaceae | 0.83 | 3.33 | 0.22 | 0.65 | 0.08 | 0.25 | 0.77 | 1.65 | ||
| 15 | D. mespiliformis | Ebenaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| 16 | D. condylocarpon | Apocynaceae | 13.33 | 15.83 | 3.51 | 3.09 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 5.43 | 3.85 | ||
| 17 | E. delevoyi | Fabaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| 18 | E. abyssinica | Fabaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| 19 | E. africanum | Fabaceae | - | 5.83 | - | 1.13 | - | 0.33 | - | 2.2 | ||
| 20 | F. saligna | Proteaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| 21 | F. stuhlmannii | Moraceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| 22 | F. sycomorus | Moraceae | 0.83 | - | 0.21 | - | 0.83 | - | 0.78 | - | ||
| 23 | Ficus sp | Moraceae | - | 0.83 | - | 0.16 | - | 0.08 | - | 0.55 | ||
| 24 | G. huillensis | Clusiaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| 25 | H. monopetalus | Annonaceae | 0.83 | - | 0.22 | - | 0.08 | - | 0.78 | - | ||
| 26 | H. acida | Phyllanthaceae | - | 0.83 | - | 0.16 | - | 0.08 | - | 0.55 | ||
| 27 | Isoberlinia. Spp | Fabaceae | 92.5 | 15.83 | 24.34 | 3.09 | 0.67 | 0.75 | 6.2 | 4.94 | ||
| 28 | J. globiflora | Fabaceae | 24.17 | - | 6.35 | - | 0.42 | - | 3.88 | - | ||
| 29 | J. paniculata | Fabaceae | 75 | 4.17 | 19.74 | 0.81 | 0.83 | 0.17 | 7.75 | 1.1 | ||
| 30 | L. kirkii | Apocynaceae | - | 1.67 | - | 0.32 | - | 0.08 | - | 0.55 | ||
| 31 | L. discolor | Anacardiaceae | - | 5 | - | 0.98 | - | 0.33 | - | 2.2 | ||
| 32 | M. macroura | Dipterocarpaceae | - | 17.5 | - | 3.41 | - | 0.25 | - | 1.65 | ||
| 33 | M. katangensis | Dipterocarpaceae | - | 7.5 | - | 1.46 | - | 0.41 | - | 2.75 | ||
| 34 | O. schweinfurthiana | Ochnaceae | 5.83 | - | 1.54 | - | 0.42 | - | 3.88 | - | ||
| 35 | O. obtusifolia | Olacaceae | - | 2.5 | - | 0.48 | - | 0.17 | - | 0.55 | ||
| 36 | P. curatellifolia | Chrysobalanaceae | 0.83 | 6.67 | 0.21 | 1.3 | 0.83 | 0.41 | 0.78 | 2.75 | ||
| 37 | P. angolensis | Fabaceae | 1.7 | 10.83 | 0.44 | 2.11 | 0.17 | 0.58 | 1.55 | 3.85 | ||
| 38 | P. thonningii | Fabaceae | - | 0.83 | - | 0.16 | - | 0.08 | - | 0.55 | ||
| 39 | P. maprouneifolia | Phyllanthaceae | - | 4.16 | - | 0.81 | - | 0.17 | - | 1.1 | ||
| 40 | P. febrifugum | Hypericaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| 41 | P. angolensis | Fabaceae | 10 | 20.83 | 2.63 | 4.07 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 5.42 | 3.85 | ||
| 42 | P. tinctorius | Fabaceae | 19.17 | - | 5.04 | - | 0.58 | - | 5.42 | - | ||
| 43 | R. engleriana | Rubiaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| 44 | S. longepedunculata | Polygalaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| 45 | S. quinqueloba | Sterculiaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| 46 | S. innocua | Loganiaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| 47 | S. pungens | Loganiaceae | - | 0.83 | - | 0.16 | - | 0.08 | - | 0.55 | ||
| 48 | S. spinosa | Loganiaceae | 3.33 | 5 | 0.88 | 0.33 | 0.25 | 0.17 | 2.33 | 1.1 | ||
| 49 | S. cocculoides | Loganiaceae | - | 3.33 | - | 0.65 | - | 0.33 | - | 2.2 | ||
| 50 | Strychnos sp | Loganiaceae | - | 4.17 | - | 0.81 | - | 0.33 | - | 2.2 | ||
| 51 | S. cordatum | Myrtaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| 52 | S. guineense | Myrtaceae | - | 0.83 | - | 0.16 | - | 0.08 | - | 0.55 | ||
| 53 | T. mollis | Combretaceae | 0.83 | - | 0.21 | - | 0.08 | - | 0.78 | - | ||
| 54 | T. garckeana | Malvaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| 55 | U. kirkiana | Phyllanthaceae | 11.67 | 17.5 | 3.07 | 3.41 | 0.41 | 0.75 | 3.88 | 4.94 | ||
| 56 | U. nitida | Phyllanthaceae | 3.33 | 10 | 0.88 | 1.95 | 0.17 | 0.42 | 1.55 | 2.75 | ||
| 57 | U. pilosa | Phyllanthaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| 58 | Ximenia sp | Olacaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| 59 | Z. africana | Fabaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| 60 | Z. chalybeum | Rutaceae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
