1. Introduction
Obesity, as excessive body fat accumulation due to continued energy imbalance, has been a notable health burden since the 1980s [
1], and currently, 38% of the global population is classified as overweight or obese. Furthermore, it is expected that by 2035, 27% of the world population will be overweight and another 24% will be obese [
2]. An increasing projected prevalence of obesity has been reported in Asia countries [
3,
4]. Moreover, the Nutrition and Health Survey in Taiwan (NAHSIT) revealed that the prevalence of overweight and obesity increased rapidly from 1993–1996 to 2013–2016 (33.2% to 50.7%), and approximately one in two men and one in three women were overweight or obese [
5].
Obesity-associated comorbidities include type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, cancers, osteoarthritis, cognitive decline, and infertility [
6]. Studies have shown that overweight and obese men have higher rates of abnormal sperm quality and hormone levels [
7,
8] and higher reproductive failure rates, such as pregnancy loss and decreased pregnancy rates following artificial reproductive technology treatment [
9,
10]. Male overweight and obesity even adversely impact the health of their offspring, with an increased risk of metabolic disorders and effects on neurologic function and respiratory function [
11].
Obesity and obesity-induced metabolic changes, such as elevated insulin levels and lipid profiles, alter various mechanisms involved in male reproduction, including the hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal axis, testosterone biosynthesis, spermatogenesis, oxidative stress, apoptosis and inflammation [
12,
13]. Abnormal autophagy is another mediator of obesity’s downstream effects that was recently found to function in spermatogenesis and testosterone biosynthesis [
14]. Furthermore, oxidative stress-mediated mechanisms contribute to nearly 50% of infertility cases. The accumulation of reactive oxygen species triggers inflammation, apoptosis, and autophagy, leading to abnormalities of sperm function and infertility [
15,
16].
Due to its delicious taste and widely distribution across temperate regions, including Europe, North America, and Asia,
Morchella esculenta (ME), has been one of the most popular edible mushrooms [
17]. In the past few decades, with the understanding of the health benefits associated with mushroom consumption, studies on mushrooms have greatly expanded. According to modern studies, ME and its bioactive ingredients, such as organic acids, phenolic compounds and polysaccharides, exert health-promoting, antiobesogenic, antioxidant, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and antitumor properties [
18,
19,
20,
21]. In addition, oral feeding of ME extract has been reported to have a protective effect against reproductive impairments in a heavy metal toxicity-induced rat model [
22]. Because its potential actions on male infertility caused by diet-induced obesity are not completely understood, the goal of this study was to identify the effects of ME treatment on testicular and sperm function using a high-fat diet-induced obese animal model and to investigate its roles in redox imbalance, apoptosis, inflammation, and autophagy in the testis.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Animals and Treatment
The animal experiments and protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the National Defense Medical Center (Taipei, Taiwan), and animal care was conducted in accordance with the guidelines. C57BL/6J mice (weighing 20–25 g, aged 8 weeks) were obtained from the National Laboratory Animal Center (Taipei, Taiwan) and housed in the animal center of the National Defense Medical Center. Mice were kept in plastic cages (2–3 per cage) under a regular 12 h light/dark cycle, 23 ± 2 degrees Celsius and 55 ± 5% humidity, and provided a standard rodent chow diet (LabDiet 5010; 13% energy from fat, 58% from carbohydrates and 29% from protein) or high-fat diet (Research Diets D12451; 45% energy from fat, 35% from carbohydrates and 20% from protein) and water ad libitum. Mice were assigned to the control group (Control, n = 8) or diet-induced obesity group (DIO, n = 24) for 16 weeks after acclimation. Then, the DIO group was divided into three groups (n = 8 per group), and all groups were given vehicle or doses of ME by oral gavage 5 days a week for 8 weeks: control (vehicle), DIO (vehicle), LME (low-dose ME: 100 mg/kg), and HME (high-dose ME: 500 mg/kg).
ME powder was prepared and provided by Grape King Bio Ltd. (Taoyuan, Taiwan), and the safety of the ME powder was tested [
23]. Briefly, the mycelium was isolated from the fresh fruiting body and maintained on potato dextrose agar (PDA) slants at 25 degrees. After 7 days, 1 cm
3 ME was removed from the PDA and transferred to a 2 L flask containing 1 L synthetic culture medium (composed of 2% sucrose, 2% soybean powder, 0.3% yeast extract, 0.05% KH
2PO
4, and 0.05% MgSO
4, adjusted to pH 5) at 25 °C for 5 days with shaking at 120 rpm. This fermentation process was then scaled up from a 2 L shake flask to 200 L fermenters for 5 days. After fermentation with a controlled pH of 5, agitation at 50 rpm, and temperature at 25 °C, the whole broth was harvested, lyophilized, ground to a powder, and stored in a desiccator at room temperature. For aqueous and ethanolic extract preparation, the freeze-dried ME powder was suspended at 1:20 w/v in water and ethanol (95%). Briefly, the aqueous suspension mixture was boiled at 121 degrees for 15 min, while the ethanolic suspension mixture was sonicated in a bath sonicator for 1 h. Afterward, both suspensions were passed through filter papers and concentrated through a rotary evaporator or freeze dryer. The nutrient content of the dried ME powder revealed that the crude carbohydrate, protein, and lipid contents were 39%, 39%, and 17%, respectively, with 4% moisture and 0.3% ash [
23]. The total polysaccharides in the ME powder was determined using phenol-sulfuric acid reaction [
24], and the content was 11.5%.
2.2. Serum Analyses
Mice were euthanized, and blood was collected by heart puncture at the end of the experiment. Serum was separated from blood samples using centrifugation and sent to the National Laboratory Animal Center for measurements of total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), and glucose levels. Serum insulin (10-1247-01; Mercodia, Uppsala, Sweden), follicle-stimulating hormone (MBS2507988; MyBioSource, San Diego, CA, USA), luteinizing hormone (MBS2514287; MyBioSource), and testosterone (No. 582701; Cayman, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) levels were determined using commercially available kits. The homeostasis model assessment for the insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was calculated by using the following formula: HOMA-IR = [fasting serum glucose (mg/dL) × insulin (mIU/L)] /405 [
25].
2.3. Assessments of Sperm Motility, Sperm Count, and Sperm Morphology
Spermatozoa were collected from the vas deferens after weighing, and an evaluation of sperm motility was instantly performed. The diluted sample was loaded in a Neubauer chamber (Marienfield-Superior, Lauda-Königshofen, Germany) and placed on the microscope stage, and the percentage of motile cells was visually calculated. The sperm count was assessed using an automated cell counter (Bio-Rad, Redmond, WA, USA) by inserting the counting slide filled with sample. In terms of sperm morphology, smear samples were fixed in methanol, stained with 2% eosin solution, washed with ethanol, dried at room temperature, and observed under a light microscope, and the percentage of normal sperm morphology was calculated.
2.4. Histology
Liver and testis tissues were cleaned in cold phosphate-buffered saline and fixed with 10% formalin. Then, the tissues were sent to the pathology division of the Cardinal Tien Hospital (New Taipei City, Taiwan) for processing, paraffin embedding, sectioning into 4-μm slices and staining with hematoxylin and eosin. The stained slides were observed at appropriate magnification under a light microscope (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) and analyzed using ImageJ.
2.5. Testicular Redox Status
Total protein was extracted from the testis tissues and used to measure the activities of testicular antioxidants, including superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and glutathione peroxidase (GPx). In addition, the formation of malondialdehyde (MDA) in the testis was also measured with commercial ELISA kits following the manufacturer’s protocols (Catalog number: 706002, 707002, 703102 and 10009055, respectively, for SOD, CAT, GPx and MDA; Cayman).
2.6. Western Blotting
Proteins were separated using sodium dodecyl sulfate‒polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred from the gel to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. The membrane was blocked with 5% nonfat dry milk blocking buffer and incubated in different dilutions of primary antibody at 4 °C overnight. The membrane was washed in TBST 3 times for 10 min, incubated with a dilution of secondary antibody, and rewashed in TBST 3 times for 10 min. Before detection with a chemiluminescent imaging system, the membranes were soaked in ECL reagent for 1 min. The following primary antibodies were used: anti-caspase 9 (#9508, 1:1000 dilution; Cell Signaling Technology, MA, USA), anti-Bax (#2772, 1:1000 dilution; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-Bcl-xl (ab32370, 1:1000 dilution; Abcam, MA, USA), anti-caspase 3 (#9662, 1:750 dilution; Cell Signaling Technology), anti-NF-кB (E381, 1:1000 dilution; Abcam), anti-TNF-α (ab1793, 1:1000 dilution; Abcam), anti-IL6 (sc-48402, 1:500 dilution; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA, USA), anti-Beclin 1 (sc-48341, 1:1000 dilution; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-LC3B (sc-271625, 1:1000 dilution; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-P62 (sc-48402, 1:1000 dilution; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and anti-β-actin (A5316, 1:10000 dilution; Sigma, MO, USA). The following secondary antibodies were used: anti-mouse (sc-2005, 1:5000 dilution; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and anti-rabbit (sc-2054, 1:4000 dilution; Santa Cruz Biotechnology).
2.7. Statistical Analyses
All data are presented as the mean ± SD. After assessing heterogeneity among the groups with the Bartlett’s test, one-way ANOVA and Welch’s ANOVA were used to examine data from multiple groups, followed by Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) test and Dunnett’s T3 test, and results were considered significant at p < 0.05.
4. Discussion
This study established a mouse model of HFD-induced obesity, and obese mice presented higher weight gain, epididymal fat mass, and metabolic markers, including serum glucose, insulin, and total cholesterol levels, as expected. However, obese mice fed low-dose ME in this study showed no significant changes in the previously mentioned parameters, whereas those fed high-dose ME showed slightly reduced glucose and insulin levels, along with lower HOMA-IR, indicating an improvement in insulin resistant. The mild regulation of glucose and insulin may be the result of a long-term HFD that impairs structure and secretory functions of β-cells, as suggested by Yi et al [
26]. Furthermore, ME-derived polysaccharides (200, 400, and 600 mg/kg) could notably improve hyperglycemia and insulin sensitivity in a diabetic mice model, possibly through binding glucose and decrease absorbable glucose level in the intestine [
27].
In addition, obese mice have lower serum TG concentrations, whether receiving ME treatment or not, which may be explained by elevated hepatic TG accumulation because of HFD feeding that enhances fatty acid uptake into the liver [
28]. H&E-stained images of the liver have revealed higher lipid accumulation in obese mice. Nevertheless, in this study, the hepatoprotective effect was scarcely noticeable in the low-dose ME treatment but was more apparent in the high-dose ME-treated obese mice, with a significantly lower liver weight and decreased lipid droplet accumulation compared to the vehicle-treated obese mice. Meng et al. established an alcohol-induced liver injury mice model, and both 400 and 800 mg/kg doses of ME fruit bodies demonstrated comparable efficacy in alleviating serum markers of hepatocellular damage, while the 200 mg/kg dose had no significant effect, which is consistent with the findings of the present study. The lack of dose-dependency in ME treatment may be attributed to the common characteristic of natural product, in which nutritional components and bioactive ingredients possess beneficial effects by modulating various signaling pathways rather than targeting a specific mechanism [
29].
Although the mice in this study exhibited weight gain and visceral fat with aberrant metabolic parameters, ME treatment significantly improved sperm motility and the percentage of normal morphology. The process of spermatozoa production was also analyzed. Because the spermatogenic cycle in mice is normally approximately 35 days [
30], 8 weeks of supplementation should be enough to correct obesity-derived abnormal spermatozoa production and indeed improve spermatogenesis, with better arranged sperm cells and fewer vacuoles found in ME-treated mice. Besides, the serum testosterone level was notably reduced in obese mice and restored following ME treatment. Iqbal reported that the use of ME extract helps restore testis and epididymal morphology, as well as testosterone production in cadmium-induced male rats, and inferred a promoting effect of ME on hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal (HPG) axis [
22]. The HPG axis, which comprises of GnRH, FSH, and LH, regulates production of testosterone and sperm. FSH affects Sertoli cells, which in turn control germ cell survival, and LH stimulates testosterone synthesis in Leydig cells [
31]. FSH and testosterone could inhibit proliferation–apoptosis blocks during spermatogenesis and help spermatogonia differentiate into spermatozoa, as well as the maintenance of the blood-testis barrier integrity [
32]. In this study, both doses of ME had a slightly increasing trend in FSH level in the obese mice that had no significance compared with lean and obese mice but exhibited an attenuated obesity-induced reduced LH level.
Various lines of evidence suggest that oxidative stress is one of the most important factors responsible for male infertility [
33,
34]. Wu et al. reviewed and reported the antioxidant properties of ME, including scavenging free radicals, increasing the activities of antioxidant enzymes, and decreasing the formation of lipid peroxidation [
35]. Similarly, ME-treated obese mice in this study had elevated activities of SOD, CAT, and GPx with reduced MDA content. Bioactive compounds of ME, including phenolic compounds, polysaccharides, organic acids and tocopherols, have been reported strong antioxidant properties based on in vivo and in vitro studies [
18]. Besides, Tian et al. suggested that the polysaccharides play a key role in the antioxidant ability of ME [
36], and are abundantly present in the ME powder (11.5%). Inflammation-, apoptosis-, and autophagy-mediated factors were also analyzed to enhance discussions of male infertility [
14,
15,
37]. The anti-inflammatory effects of ME observed in other animal disease models [
29,
38] were linked to the NF-κB signaling, and the protein expression of p50 subunit and IL-6 in this study as lowering t. Rehman et al. demonstrated that ME-derived polysaccharide downregulated the TLR4 signaling pathway and inactivated NF-κB and proinflammatory cytokines, and restore intestine integrity damaged by HFD-induced obesity [
39]. In addition, ME may exert anti-inflammatory effects by regulating the arachidonic acid metabolic pathway (upstream of NF-κB), prostaglandin endoperoxide synthetase activity and prostaglandin biosynthesis (downstream of NF-κB), as shown in a molecular docking and network pharmacology study [
20].
Oxidative stress due to ROS accumulation triggers apoptosis and autophagy in germ cells [
40], as supported by an increased Bax/Bcl-xl ratio and elevated expression of caspases in obese mice. However, unlike other studies [
41,
42], obese mice in this study had higher protein expression of Beclin 1, P62, and LC3B-II. Beclin 1 and LC3 are general markers indicating activation of autophagy, while P62 indicates the inhibition of autophagy, revealing inconsistent signs of autophagy. ME treatment significantly lowered cleaved caspase 9 and Beclin 1 expression but had no significant effects on other markers involved in apoptosis and autophagy, and high-dose ME exhibited minor improvements compared to low-dose ME. Jeong et al. stated that, despite having inconspicuous impacts on apoptosis and autophagy, caspase 9 is not only the upstream mediator of apoptosis but also a mediator of autophagy [
43].
Furthermore, the markers analyzed in this study are principal but not comprehensive, such as the lack of detection of DNA fragmentation as the late stage of apoptosis, monitoring of inflammation, apoptosis, and autophagy in the testis via immunofluorescence or immunohistochemistry.
Figure 1.
(a) Body weight, weight gain, (b) food intake, (c) energy intake, (d) reproductive organs, and (e) epididymal fat mass in control, obese, LME-treated obese, and HME-treated obese mice. Values are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 8 per group). Bars in (a,c,d) with letters (a,b) presented statistical significance (p < 0.05) based on one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD test; in (b,e) with letters (a–c) based on Welch’s ANOVA with Dunnett’s T3 test. LME, low-dose ME; HME, high-dose ME.
Figure 1.
(a) Body weight, weight gain, (b) food intake, (c) energy intake, (d) reproductive organs, and (e) epididymal fat mass in control, obese, LME-treated obese, and HME-treated obese mice. Values are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 8 per group). Bars in (a,c,d) with letters (a,b) presented statistical significance (p < 0.05) based on one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD test; in (b,e) with letters (a–c) based on Welch’s ANOVA with Dunnett’s T3 test. LME, low-dose ME; HME, high-dose ME.
Figure 2.
Serum glucose, insulin, HOMA-IR, total cholesterol, and triglyceride levels in control, obese, LME-treated obese, and HME-treated obese mice. Values are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 6 per group). Bars with letters (a–c) presented statistical significance (p < 0.05) based on one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD test. HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; LME, low-dose ME; HME, high-dose ME.
Figure 2.
Serum glucose, insulin, HOMA-IR, total cholesterol, and triglyceride levels in control, obese, LME-treated obese, and HME-treated obese mice. Values are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 6 per group). Bars with letters (a–c) presented statistical significance (p < 0.05) based on one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD test. HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance; LME, low-dose ME; HME, high-dose ME.
Figure 3.
Liver weight, percentages of hepatic lipid droplet area, and liver histology in control, obese, LME-treated obese, and HME-treated obese mice. All scale bars are 100 μm. Values are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 8 per group). Bars with letters (a–c) presented statistical significance (p < 0.05) based on Welch’s ANOVA with Dunnett’s T3 test. LME, low-dose ME; HME, high-dose ME.
Figure 3.
Liver weight, percentages of hepatic lipid droplet area, and liver histology in control, obese, LME-treated obese, and HME-treated obese mice. All scale bars are 100 μm. Values are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 8 per group). Bars with letters (a–c) presented statistical significance (p < 0.05) based on Welch’s ANOVA with Dunnett’s T3 test. LME, low-dose ME; HME, high-dose ME.
Figure 4.
(a) Sperm quality and (b) FSH, LH, and testosterone levels in control, obese, LME-treated obese, and HME-treated obese mice. Values are presented as the mean ± SD with (a) n = 8; (b) n = 6 per group. Bars with letters (a–c) presented statistical significance (p < 0.05) based on one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD test. FSH, follicle-stimulating hormone; LH, luteinizing hormone; LME, low-dose ME; HME, high-dose ME.
Figure 4.
(a) Sperm quality and (b) FSH, LH, and testosterone levels in control, obese, LME-treated obese, and HME-treated obese mice. Values are presented as the mean ± SD with (a) n = 8; (b) n = 6 per group. Bars with letters (a–c) presented statistical significance (p < 0.05) based on one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD test. FSH, follicle-stimulating hormone; LH, luteinizing hormone; LME, low-dose ME; HME, high-dose ME.
Figure 5.
Testicular histology and evaluations of MSTD and MTBS in control, obese, LME-treated obese, and HME-treated obese mice. All scale bars are 50 μm. Values are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 8). Bars with letters (a–c) presented statistical significance (p < 0.05) based on one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD test. MSTD, mean seminiferous tubule diameter; MTBS, mean testicular biopsy score; LME, low-dose ME; HME, high-dose ME.
Figure 5.
Testicular histology and evaluations of MSTD and MTBS in control, obese, LME-treated obese, and HME-treated obese mice. All scale bars are 50 μm. Values are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 8). Bars with letters (a–c) presented statistical significance (p < 0.05) based on one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD test. MSTD, mean seminiferous tubule diameter; MTBS, mean testicular biopsy score; LME, low-dose ME; HME, high-dose ME.
Figure 6.
Activities of SOD, CAT, and GPx and MDA content in the testes of control, obese, LME-treated obese, and HME-treated obese mice. Values are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 6). Bars with letters (a–b) presented statistical significance (p < 0.05) based on one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD test. SOD, superoxide dismutase; CAT, catalase; GPx, glutathione peroxidase; MDA, malondialdehyde; LME, low-dose ME; HME, high-dose ME.
Figure 6.
Activities of SOD, CAT, and GPx and MDA content in the testes of control, obese, LME-treated obese, and HME-treated obese mice. Values are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 6). Bars with letters (a–b) presented statistical significance (p < 0.05) based on one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD test. SOD, superoxide dismutase; CAT, catalase; GPx, glutathione peroxidase; MDA, malondialdehyde; LME, low-dose ME; HME, high-dose ME.
Figure 7.
Protein expression of apoptosis-related markers in the testes of control, obese, LME-treated obese, and HME-treated obese mice. Values are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 6). Bars with letters (a–c) presented statistical significance (p < 0.05) based on one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD test. LME, low-dose ME; HME, high-dose ME.
Figure 7.
Protein expression of apoptosis-related markers in the testes of control, obese, LME-treated obese, and HME-treated obese mice. Values are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 6). Bars with letters (a–c) presented statistical significance (p < 0.05) based on one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD test. LME, low-dose ME; HME, high-dose ME.
Figure 8.
Protein expression of inflammation-related markers in the testes of control, obese, LME-treated obese, and HME-treated obese mice. Values are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 6). Bars with letters (a–b) presented statistical significance (p < 0.05) based on one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD test. LME, low-dose ME; HME, high-dose ME.
Figure 8.
Protein expression of inflammation-related markers in the testes of control, obese, LME-treated obese, and HME-treated obese mice. Values are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 6). Bars with letters (a–b) presented statistical significance (p < 0.05) based on one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD test. LME, low-dose ME; HME, high-dose ME.
Figure 9.
Protein expression of autophagy-related markers in the testes of control, obese, LME-treated obese, and HME-treated obese mice. Values are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 6). Bars with letters (a–c) presented statistical significance (p < 0.05) based on one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD test. LME, low-dose ME; HME, high-dose ME.
Figure 9.
Protein expression of autophagy-related markers in the testes of control, obese, LME-treated obese, and HME-treated obese mice. Values are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 6). Bars with letters (a–c) presented statistical significance (p < 0.05) based on one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD test. LME, low-dose ME; HME, high-dose ME.