Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Preparation of VO Composite Cathode Material Based on In-Situ Intercalated Polyaniline and Its High-Performance Aqueous Zinc-Ion Battery Applications

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

27 March 2025

Posted:

30 March 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
With the rapid development of renewable energy, efficient and stable energy storage technologies have become a research focus in the energy sector. Aqueous zinc-ion batteries (AZIBs) hold great promise for electrochemical energy storage due to their high safety, abundant zinc resources, high theoretical specific capacity, and low redox potential. However, AZIBs still face challenges such as low electronic conductivity, sluggish ion migration kinetics, zinc dendrite growth, and side reactions, which severely limit their practical applications. To address the issues of the large zinc-ion radius and the restricted interlayer spacing of vanadium oxides, this study proposes an innovative in-situ intercalation polyaniline (PANI) molecular modification strategy. A flower-like organic-inorganic hybrid material, PANI-V2O5 , is successfully synthesized via a synchronous oxidative polymerization method. This strategy effectively regulates the interlayer spacing of vanadium oxides without introducing inert cations, significantly enhancing the material's conductivity and structural stability while accelerating zinc-ion diffusion kinetics. Electrochemical tests demonstrate that PANI-V2O5 exhibits a high specific capacity of up to 450 mAh·g⁻¹ at a current density of 0.1 A·g⁻¹ and retains 96.7% of its capacity after 300 cycles at 1 A·g⁻¹, showcasing excellent cycling stability and rate performance. This study provides new insights into the design of high-performance cathode materials for zinc-ion batteries and lays a theoretical and experimental foundation for the development of efficient and stable energy storage systems in the future.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

In recent years, coal-based energy has caused significant environmental issues, posing severe challenges to the principle of sustainable development in modern society [1,2,3]. Against this backdrop, renewable energy sources, represented by electricity, have gradually emerged as a crucial part of the energy system [4,5,6]. Among them, clean energy sources such as wind and solar power play a key role in energy conversion due to their broad application prospects. However, the efficient utilization of renewable energy relies on advancements in energy storage technologies, with secondary batteries - particularly lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) - playing an indispensable role in energy storage systems [7,8].
Despite dominating the energy storage field, lithium-ion batteries still face several challenges. The primary concern is the scarcity of lithium resources, as lithium reserves are limited and unevenly distributed. The rising cost of lithium in the future may further hinder its widespread application. Moreover, the organic electrolytes used in lithium-ion batteries pose safety risks, including flammability and explosion hazards during charge-discharge cycles, which create additional challenges for large-scale deployment [9,10,11]. Therefore, the development of alternative secondary battery systems that are resource-abundant and safer has become a crucial research direction to replace lithium-ion batteries.
In recent years, sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) and potassium-ion batteries (PIBs) have attracted widespread attention due to their abundant raw material reserves and low cost [12]. However, the high chemical reactivity of Na⁺ and K⁺ poses significant safety risks, and their relatively large ionic radii makes it challenging to find suitable cathode and anode materials, further complicating their reversible storage [13].
Meanwhile, rechargeable batteries based on multivalent metal ions (such as Mg²⁺, Ca²⁺, Zn²⁺, and Al³⁺ batteries) have become a research hotspot due to their high safety, high volumetric energy density, and abundant crustal reserves. However, one of the key challenges these batteries face is the development of a reversible electrolyte system compatible with magnesium, calcium, or aluminum metal anodes. Existing electrolytes often corrode metal anodes or current collectors, leading to the formation of inactive surface layers, which hinder the reversible charge-discharge process of the battery [14,15,16].
Among various alternative energy storage systems, zinc-ion batteries (ZIBs) have rapidly gained widespread attention due to their unique advantages [17,18,19]. As an anode material, zinc offers several significant benefits: (1) It is compatible with both aqueous and non-aqueous electrolytes, enhancing system safety. (2) Zinc has a relatively high redox potential (-0.763 V vs. the standard hydrogen electrode), allowing ZIBs to operate stably in aqueous electrolytes—a challenge for many other mobile-ion batteries [20,21]. (3) Compared to lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), ZIBs offer higher safety and lower environmental risks. (4) The reversible plating/stripping characteristics of zinc enable ZIBs to function in near-neutral or mildly acidic electrolytes (pH = 3.6-6.0), effectively suppressing zinc dendrite formation and the side-product ZnO, thereby ensuring a long cycle life. (5) ZIBs exhibit a volumetric energy density of up to 5855 mAh cm⁻³, significantly higher than LIBs (2061 mAh cm⁻³), owing to the high density of Zn and its two-electron redox reaction mechanism. As a result, ZIBs hold great potential for applications in miniaturized devices, such as wearable sensors and implantable medical devices, demonstrating promising commercialization prospects [22].
Although aqueous zinc-ion batteries (ZIBs) offer numerous advantages, research on their key electrode material - vanadium-based oxides - is still in the exploratory stage. Given the high safety, low cost, and environmental friendliness of AZIBs, modifying vanadium-based oxides holds significant scientific importance [23,24]. However, these materials still suffer from several drawbacks, including sluggish kinetics, poor electronic conductivity, structural collapse during cycling, and vanadium dissolution [25,26].
Compared to lithium-ion batteries, zinc ions experience stronger electrostatic interactions during intercalation, which restricts ion diffusion and accelerates capacity decay [26,27]. To address this issue, pre-intercalation techniques have been proposed to facilitate Zn²⁺ diffusion between the layers of vanadium-based materials and effectively regulate the crystal structure of electrode materials [28,29,30]. Additionally, pre-intercalated materials serve as structural supports, maintaining electrode stability after Zn2+ extraction and thereby enhancing cycle life. Common pre-intercalation strategies include ion pre-intercalation and molecular pre-intercalation [30]. While ion pre-intercalation can improve structural stability to some extent, molecular pre-intercalation - especially with conductive polymers - has proven to be more effective. Due to their larger molecular size, conductive polymers can significantly expand the interlayer spacing of vanadium oxides, promoting Zn2+ diffusion within the crystal structure [23,31,32,33,34,35]. Furthermore, the insolubility of conductive polymers in electrolytes helps maintain the stability of the intercalated structure during cycling.
Among various vanadium-based oxide materials, V₂O₅ has been widely used as a cathode material for AZIBs due to its variable valence states (+2 to +5), multi-electron redox reactions, abundant crustal reserves, and tunable crystal structure [36,37]. V₂O₅ possesses a typical layered structure, where VO₅ square pyramids are linked into sheets, with weak vanadium-oxygen bonds connecting adjacent layers. This unique layered structure provides ideal diffusion channels for Zn²⁺intercalation/deintercalation, enabling a theoretical capacity of 589 mAh·g⁻¹. However, due to the high charge density and relatively large radius of Zn²⁺, the Zn²⁺ storage performance of V₂O₅ still faces challenges such as slow insertion kinetics and poor cycling stability [38].
To enhance the zinc storage performance of V₂O₅, researchers have explored various strategies, including metal cation doping, structural water pre-intercalation, and organic group modifications, to improve the stability and electrochemical reversibility of its layered structure. Chou and his team successfully synthesized V₂O₅-x/PANI superlattice composites using a hydrothermal reaction method by introducing polyaniline (PANI) into the interlayers of V₂O₅ [39]. Their study found that the PANI layers not only prevented the dissolution of V₂O₅-x in aqueous solutions but also expanded the interlayer spacing and weakened the electrostatic interaction between Zn²⁺ and O2-, thereby enhancing the reversible Zn²⁺ storage performance. Similarly, Kumankuma et al. developed a PEDOT@YVO composite material, where the incorporation of the conductive polymer PEDOT effectively increased the interlayer spacing of YVO, achieving a high initial specific capacity of 308.5 mAh·g⁻¹ at a 0.2 C rate [40].
In this study, without introducing inactive cations, it proposes an innovative molecular modification strategy based on synchronous oxidative polymerization. By precisely controlling the self-assembly process of vanadate and aniline precursors, it successfully constructs an organic-inorganic hybrid composite material (PANI-V₂O₅) with tunable interlayer spacing. This strategy not only effectively expands the interlayer spacing of V₂O₅, improving its electronic and ionic conductivity, but also enhances its structural stability, thereby significantly improving the zinc-ion diffusion kinetics within the electrode material. Systematic electrochemical tests validate the superior performance of the PANI-V₂O₅ composite material in aqueous zinc-ion batteries (AZIBs). The results demonstrate that this novel PANI-V₂O₅ hybrid material not only provides a new design approach for high-performance aqueous ZIB cathode materials but also lays a solid foundation for enhancing the practical applications of zinc-ion batteries.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

In this study, a simple hydrothermal method is employed to synthesize polyaniline-intercalated vanadium oxide (PANI-V₂O₅) organic-inorganic composite material. The specific steps are as follows. Firstly, 1.5 g of NH₄VO₃ crystals are weighed and placed in a beaker, followed by the addition of 60 mL of deionized water. The mixture is subjected to ultrasonic treatment for 30 minutes to ensure complete dissolution of NH₄VO₃, forming a light yellow solution. Subsequently, the beaker is placed in a 0°C environment, and a certain amount of aniline solution is slowly added dropwise while stirring. Simultaneously, 2.2 mol·L⁻¹ dilute hydrochloric acid is used to adjust the pH of the solution to approximately 3.
After stirring for 5 hours, the obtained solution is transferred into a Teflon-lined autoclave and subjected to a hydrothermal reaction at 140°C for 24 hours. Upon completion of the reaction, the product is collected and repeatedly washed with deionized water and ethanol to remove any unreacted impurities. Finally, the sample is dried in an oven at 60°C for 12 hours, yielding the PANI-V₂O₅ composite material.

2.2. Characterization of Cathode Material

2.2.1. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS)

The SEM and EDS test results are shown in Figure 1, which characterizes the microstructure and elemental composition of V₂O₅ and PANI - V₂O₅ composite materials.
Figure 1a presents the SEM image of V₂O₅ obtained without the addition of aniline monomers. It can be observed that V₂O₅ exhibits irregular spherical particles with a rough surface. The particle size distribution is uniform, and the particles are densely packed together. This compact structure may impose certain limitations on the ion transport capability of the material.
Figure 1b illustrates the morphology of V₂O₅ after the introduction of PANI. Compared to pure V₂O₅, the morphology of PANI-V₂O₅ undergoes significant changes, with the surface becoming more porous and less compact. Additionally, spiky, sea-urchin-like structures measuring approximately 2 - 5 nm can be observed on the surface of PANI-V₂O₅. These morphological changes indicate that PANI doping induces a rearrangement of the V₂O₅ internal structure, optimizing the particle aggregation state. This structural adjustment not only increases the specific surface area of the material but also enhances the permeability of electrolyte ions, thereby improving its electrochemical performance.
Figure 1c further presents an enlarged view of the nanostructure of PANI-V₂O₅. Clearly visible are nanofiber-like structures on the material surface, with fiber diameters in the tens of nanometers range. These nanofibers originate from the growth of PANI, confirming the successful doping of PANI. The nanofiber structure significantly increases the material’s specific surface area, providing more active sites, while also effectively shortening the diffusion pathways for electrolyte ions, thereby enhancing the kinetics of the electrochemical reactions.
Figure 1d shows the EDS test results, which analyze the elemental composition and distribution of the material. The test results reveal the uniform presence of vanadium (V), oxygen (O), carbon (C), and nitrogen (N) in the sample, with C and N originating from PANI molecules. This further confirms the successful intercalation of PANI into the layered structure of V₂O₅. Additionally, the inset illustrates the spatial distribution of the elements, showing a homogeneous dispersion of all elements. This suggests that the introduction of PANI does not cause phase separation, ensuring the structural stability of the composite material. Such uniform elemental distribution plays a crucial role in enhancing the electrochemical stability of the material.

2.2.2. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) Analysis

To further investigate the microstructure and morphological characteristics of PANI-V₂O₅, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis is conducted. Figure 2 presents high-resolution TEM images of the PANI-V₂O₅ material, where Figure 2a shows the TEM image of V₂O₅ without polyaniline (PANI) incorporation, and Figure 2b displays the TEM image of PANI-V₂O₅ after PANI introduction.
As observed in Figure 2a, the pristine V₂O₅ exhibits a tightly stacked layered structure with an interlayer spacing of 1.05 nm, indicating a well-ordered lamellar arrangement. In contrast, Figure 2b shows that the interlayer spacing of PANI-V₂O₅ increases to 1.25 nm, exhibiting a relatively loosened layered structure. This change suggests that the successful intercalation of PANI expands the V₂O₅ interlayer spacing, primarily due to the introduction of PANI molecules, which increase electrostatic repulsion between layers and promote interlayer expansion.
The enlargement of interlayer spacing significantly impacts the electrochemical performance of the material. A larger interlayer spacing facilitates the penetration of electrolyte ions into the material, thereby reducing charge transfer resistance and enhancing ion diffusion rates, ultimately improving electrochemical energy storage performance. Therefore, PANI intercalation not only modifies the microstructure of V₂O₅ but also potentially enhances its energy storage capability, making it a promising candidate for energy storage devices and electrode materials.

2.2.3. X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) and Raman Spectroscopy Analysis

The results of X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Raman spectroscopy are shown in Figure 3, where Figure 3a presents the XRD patterns of V₂O₅ and PANI-V₂O₅, while Figure 3b shows the Raman spectra of both materials.
In Figure 3a, the pure V₂O₅ sample (black curve) exhibits characteristic diffraction peaks of layered V₂O₅, with clearly visible reflections from the (001), (200), and (300) crystal planes. In contrast, the XRD pattern of the PANI-V₂O₅ composite (green curve) retains the main diffraction peaks of V₂O₅, indicating that the material maintains its layered structure. However, a noticeable shift of the (001) diffraction peak toward a smaller angle in the PANI-V₂O₅ spectrum suggests an increase in interlayer spacing due to PANI incorporation. This observation is consistent with the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) results, further confirming the successful intercalation of PANI.
To further evaluate the molecular structure and interactions of PANI-V₂O₅, Raman spectroscopy is performed in the range of 0-3000 cm⁻¹, with the results shown in Figure 3b. The Raman spectrum of pure V₂O₅ (green curve) exhibits characteristic V–O vibrational peaks. Meanwhile, the PANI - V₂O₅ spectrum (black curve) retains the main Raman peaks of V₂O₅ while introducing new characteristic peaks at 1366, 1453, 1532, and 1562 cm⁻¹. These new peaks correspond to C–C stretching vibrations and symmetric/asymmetric C=C vibrations from the PANI molecules. Additionally, the inset in Figure 3b highlights the distinct PANI characteristic peaks, further confirming its successful intercalation into the layered V₂O₅ structure and the possible formation of an ordered supramolecular structure within the composite.

2.2.4. AnalysisX-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) Analysis

Figure 4 presents the XPS analysis results of the PANI-V₂O₅ composite material, including the full spectrum and high-resolution spectra of individual elements.
Figure 4a shows the XPS spectrum of PANI-V₂O₅, clearly identifying characteristic peaks corresponding to C 1s, N 1s, O 1s, and V 2p, confirming the successful incorporation of PANI while maintaining the main structure of V₂O₅. The strong O 1s and V 2p peaks indicate that V₂O₅ remains the dominant component, whereas the presence of the N 1s peak further verifies the introduction of PANI.
Figure 4b displays the high-resolution N 1s spectrum, which can be deconvoluted into three distinct peaks: ~399 eV (N⁻, originating from the aniline group in PANI), 400 eV (-NH-, corresponding to the imine structure in the PANI chain), and 401 eV (N⁺, associated with the doped form of PANI, such as protonated structures). These peaks correspond to quinonoid rings (400.38 eV), benzenoid rings (400.73 eV), and quaternary ammonium (401.23 eV), respectively, indicating the presence of PANI in various oxidation states within the composite material. This diversity in oxidation states may enhance electron transport capability, thereby improving its electrochemical performance.
Figure 4c presents the XPS spectrum of O 1s, where three main peaks are observed: ~530.3 eV (VOₓ, representing oxygen in V₂O₅), confirming that the material retains its layered V₂O₅ structure; 531.8 eV (-OH), suggesting the presence of hydroxyl groups, possibly due to PANI incorporation or water adsorption; and 533.5 eV (H₂O), likely attributed to adsorbed water within the material. These different oxygen environments indicate that PANI doping modulates the electronic structure of V₂O₅ to some extent, influencing its physicochemical properties.
Figure 4d presents the high-resolution V 2p spectrum, revealing the coexistence of V⁴⁺and V⁵⁺oxidation states. The peaks at 516.08 eV and 523.78 eV correspond to V⁴⁺, suggesting partial reduction of V₂O₅ to VO₂, while the peaks at 517.28 eV and 524.98 eV are attributed to V⁵⁺, which is primarily derived from the main V₂O₅ structure. The coexistence of V⁴⁺and V⁵⁺indicates favorable charge transfer characteristics, contributing to improved conductivity and electrochemical stability, thereby enhancing its potential for energy storage applications.

2.2.5. Nitrogen Adsorption-Desorption Analysis

To further investigate the pore size and porosity characteristics of the synthesized materials, nitrogen adsorption-desorption tests are conducted on both PANI-V₂O₅ and V₂O₅ samples. The results are shown in Figure 5.
Figure 5a presents the nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms of V₂O₅ and PANI-V₂O₅, both exhibiting typical Langmuir IV-type isotherm characteristics, indicating the presence of a significant mesoporous structure. In the low relative pressure range (P/P₀< 0.2), the adsorption volume remains low, suggesting minimal micropore contribution and predominantly mesoporous characteristics. As the relative pressure increases (P/P₀> 0.8), the specific surface area of PANI-V₂O₅ increases significantly from 66.13 m²/g (for V₂O₅) to 81.28 m²/g. This enhancement indicates that the introduction of PANI effectively increases porosity, enlarges the specific surface area, provides more exposed active sites, enhances electrolyte wettability, and facilitates Zn²⁺storage capacity.
Figure 5b illustrates the pore size distribution of both materials, showing a predominant distribution below 25 nm, further confirming their mesoporous nature. Compared to V₂O₅, PANI-V₂O₅ exhibits a broader pore size distribution, with major peaks at approximately 2.21 nm and 17.19 nm. This suggests that PANI doping not only increases pore volume but also optimizes the pore structure. Such a hierarchical pore structure benefits rapid Zn²⁺storage and release while improving electrolyte penetration and electron transport capability, thereby enhancing the electrochemical performance and cycling stability of the material.

3. Results and Analysis

3.1. Cyclic Voltammetry Tests

Figure 6 presents the cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves of PANI-V₂O₅ at a scan rate of 0.1 mV·s⁻¹ to investigate its electrochemical reaction behavior and reversibility. The three curves in the figure correspond to the 1st (red), 2nd (blue), and 3rd (green) CV scanning cycles.
Two cathodic peaks can be clearly observed at 0.45 V and 0.9 V, indicating the intercalation of Zn²⁺ into the electrode material within this potential range. Meanwhile, the anodic peaks at 0.8 V and 1.1 V correspond to the Zn²⁺ deintercalation process. The presence of these redox peaks suggests that PANI-V₂O₅follows a typical Zn²⁺intercalation/deintercalation mechanism, effectively facilitating charge storage and providing theoretical support for its excellent electrochemical performance.
Furthermore, the overlapping degree of the CV curves demonstrates that PANI-V₂O₅ exhibits good reversibility and cycling stability in the initial cycles. The three CV curves align closely, indicating a stable electrochemical reaction kinetics during Zn²⁺ intercalation/deintercalation. It is worth noting that the first CV cycle differs slightly from the subsequent cycles, which can be attributed to the initial activation of active sites on the electrode material. As cycling progresses, the material structure stabilizes, resulting in more consistent redox behavior.
The incorporation of PANI plays a crucial role in optimizing electrochemical performance. On the one hand, PANI possesses good electrical conductivity, which enhances electron transport efficiency and accelerates Zn²⁺ intercalation/deintercalation kinetics. On the other hand, its mesoporous structure facilitates electrolyte penetration, providing a smoother pathway for Zn²⁺ migration. This synergistic effect not only improves the specific capacity of the material but also enhances its cycling stability.

3.2. Constant Current Charge-Discharge and Cycling Rate Performance Tests

Figure 7 shows the electrochemical performance of PANI-V₂O₅ and V₂O₅ under different testing conditions.
Figure 7a displays the charge-discharge curves of PANI-V₂O₅ at different current densities (0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2 A·g⁻¹). It can be seen that at a lower current density (0.1 A·g⁻¹), PANI-V₂O₅ exhibits a high specific capacity. As the current density increases, the capacity slightly decreases but still maintains good reversibility, indicating that the material has good rate capability.
Figure 7b compares the charge-discharge curves of PANI-V₂O₅and the original V₂O₅ at 100 mA·g⁻¹. From the figure, it is clear that PANI-V₂O₅ has a discharge capacity of 450 mAh·g⁻¹, which is much higher than the original V₂O₅ (194 mAh·g⁻¹). This significant improvement is mainly attributed to the introduction of PANI, which effectively enhances the Zn²⁺ storage capacity of the material.
Figure 7c further shows the rate performance of the materials at different current densities. It can be seen that the specific capacities of PANI-V₂O₅ at 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1, and 2 A·g⁻¹ are 450, 435, 384, 305, and 220 mAh·g⁻¹, respectively, demonstrating excellent Zn²⁺storage capacity. Notably, when the current density is restored to 0.1 A·g⁻¹, the specific capacity can recover to 450 mAh·g⁻¹, indicating that the material maintains good reversibility and stability during high-rate charge-discharge processes. In contrast, V₂O₅shows poorer rate performance, with a faster decline in capacity.
Figure 7d shows the long-term cycling performance of PANI-V₂O₅ and V₂O₅ at a current density of 1 A·g⁻¹. It can be seen that the capacity of V₂O₅ sharply decreases after 300 cycles, retaining only about 51.1% of its initial capacity, which is related to the instability of its structure and the dissolution of the material during the Zn²⁺insertion/extraction process. In contrast, PANI-V₂O₅ retains 96.7% of its capacity, with an average cycle decay rate of only 0.0233%, demonstrating excellent cycling stability. Moreover, the coulombic efficiency remains close to 100%, indicating that the material undergoes minimal side reactions and has good electrochemical reversibility during long-term cycling.

3.3. Electrochemical Kinetics Analysis

To better understand the electrochemical reaction behavior of the PANI-V₂O₅ electrode, CV curves at different scan rates (0.1~1.0 mV·s⁻¹) are tested. Figure 8 displays the electrochemical kinetics characteristics of PANI-V₂O₅, primarily analyzing its redox behavior, pseudocapacitive contribution, and trends with varying scan rates.
Figure 8a shows the cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves of the PANI-V₂O₅ electrode at different scan rates (0.1 ~ 1.0 mV·s⁻¹). It can be observed that as the scan rate increases, the oxidation and reduction peaks shift to different potentials, with the oxidation peak moving to a higher potential and the reduction peak to a lower potential. This is mainly attributed to the enhanced polarization effect at higher scan rates, which is due to the limitations in the electrode's kinetic process. However, the CV curves maintain similar shapes, indicating good electrochemical reversibility and stability of PANI-V₂O₅.
Moreover, the relationship between current (i) and scan rate (v) can be used to determine the kinetic mechanism of the electrode reaction. Generally, the peak current (i) and scan rate (v) follow a power-law relationship:
i = a v b
where a and b are constants, and the value of b ranges from 0.5 to 1. When b is close to 0.5, the process is mainly diffusion-controlled, indicating that ions diffuse into the electrode material's lattice. When b is close to 1, the charge storage is mainly dominated by surface pseudocapacitive behavior. Based on this relationship, the pseudocapacitive contribution of the PANI-V₂O₅ electrode can be further explored to reveal its excellent electrochemical performance.
Figure 8b shows the linear relationship between the logarithmic peak current (log(i)) and the logarithmic scan rate (log(v)) of the redox peaks. By fitting the slopes of the different oxidation and reduction peaks, the values of b are obtained to determine the dominant charge storage mechanism. The calculated b values for the four oxidation and reduction peaks are 0.82, 0.89, 0.84, and 0.90, all close to 1, indicating that the charge storage process in the PANI-V₂O₅ electrode is primarily dominated by surface-induced pseudocapacitive behavior, rather than a purely diffusion-controlled process. This pseudocapacitive effect helps improve the electrode's rate performance and fast charge-discharge capability.
To further quantitatively analyze the contribution of pseudocapacitance to the total capacity, the following mathematical relationship can be used [41]:
i = k 1 v + k 2 v 0.5
where k1 represents the pseudocapacitive contribution and k2 represents the diffusion-controlled contribution. Eq.(2) shows that the proportion of pseudocapacitance and diffusion control varies with scan rate.
Figure 8c–e further analyze the pseudocapacitive contribution of the PANI-V₂O₅ electrode at different scan rates (0.1, 0.5, 1.0 mV·s⁻¹). The shaded area represents the current density contributed by the pseudocapacitive process. Based on the calculations from Eq.(2), at a scan rate of 0.1 mV·s⁻¹, the pseudocapacitive contribution is approximately 44%. As the scan rate increases from 0.1 mV·s⁻¹ to 1.0 mV·s⁻¹, the pseudocapacitive contribution gradually increases, reaching up to 59.7%. This trend indicates that at high scan rates, the pseudocapacitive contribution becomes more dominant, giving PANI-V₂O₅ excellent rate performance and fast kinetic response. This characteristic is important for improving the charging and discharging efficiency and power density of batteries in practical applications.
Figure 8f visually displays the contribution ratios of pseudocapacitive and diffusion-controlled processes to the total capacity at different scan rates. At a low scan rate (0.1 mV·s⁻¹), the diffusion-controlled process contributes relatively more (approximately 55.6%), indicating that at low scan rates, Zn²⁺ primarily inserts/extracts into/from the electrode material via a diffusion mechanism. As the scan rate increases to 1.0 mV·s⁻¹, the pseudocapacitive contribution ratio increases from 44.3% to 59.7%, showing that at high scan rates, the pseudocapacitive effect dominates, providing PANI-V₂O₅ with excellent rate performance.

4. Conclusions

This paper addresses the key issues of poor cycling stability and insufficient rate performance in zinc-ion batteries (ZIBs) by innovatively proposing an in-situ intercalation polyaniline (PANI) molecular modification strategy. Using a synchronous oxidative polymerization method, PANI-V₂O₅ organic-inorganic hybrid materials with a flower-cluster-like microstructure are successfully synthesized using vanadates and aniline as precursors, without the involvement of inert cations.
Experimental results show that this material exhibits significant advantages in electrochemical performance. At a current density of 0.1 A·g⁻¹, the PANI-V₂O₅ hybrid material achieves a specific capacity of up to 450 mAh·g⁻¹, far exceeding that of conventional V₂O₅ materials, demonstrating its huge potential for zinc-ion storage applications. Moreover, after 300 cycles at a high current density of 1 A g⁻¹, the capacity retention of the material remains as high as 96.7%, fully proving its excellent cycling stability.
The introduction of PANI effectively expands the interlayer spacing of V₂O₅, promoting the rapid reversible intercalation/de-intercalation of Zn²⁺, while enhancing the material's electronic conductivity, thereby optimizing the rate performance and long-term stability of the zinc-ion battery. Compared to traditional V₂O₅ electrode materials, the in-situ intercalation PANI molecular modification strategy proposed in this study not only significantly improves the electrochemical performance of the electrode material but also provides a new approach for designing novel high-performance cathode materials for zinc-ion batteries.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, S.L.; writing—review and editing, T.Z., M.L., Y.L., Y.C., and X.L. ; validation, Y.L. and Q.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China (Grant NO. 2023JJ50499, NO. 2023JJ50493) and was supported by the Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Education Department (NO. 23B0807).

Data Availability Statement

All the datasets used in this manuscript are publicly available datasets already in the public domain.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Hu A, Chen W, Li F, et al. Nonflammable Polyfluorides-Anchored Quasi-Solid Electrolytes for Ultra-safe Anode-free Lithium Pouch Cells without Thermal Runaway [J]. Advanced Materials, 2023, 35(51): 2304762. [CrossRef]
  2. Yang B, Pan Y, Li T, et al. High-safety lithium Metal Pouch Cells for Extreme Abuse Conditions by Implementing Flame-Retardant Perfluorinated Gel Polymer Electrolytes [J]. Energy Storage Materials, 2024, 65: 103124. [CrossRef]
  3. Zhao C, Yan Z, Zhou B, et al. Identifying the Role of Lewis-Base Sites for The Chemistry in Lithium-Oxygen Batteries [J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2023, 62(32): 202302746. [CrossRef]
  4. Fang C, Li J, Zhang M, et al. Quantifying Inactive Lithium in Lithium Metal Batteries [J]. Nature, 2019, 572(7770): 511-515. [CrossRef]
  5. Wang P-F, Sui B-B, Sha L, et al. Nitrogen-rich Graphite Flake from Hemp as Anode Material for High Performance Lithium-Ion Batteries [J]. Chemistry – An Asian Journal, 2023, 18(13): 202300279. [CrossRef]
  6. Wang P, Gong Z, Wang D, et al. Facile Fabrication of F-doped Biomass Carbon as High-Performance Anode Material for Potassium-ion Batteries [J]. Electrochimica Acta, 2021, 389: 138799. [CrossRef]
  7. Quilty C D, Wu D, Li W, et al. Electron and Ion Transport in Lithium and Lithium-Ion Battery Negative and Positive Composite Electrodes [J]. Chemical Reviews, 2023, 123(4): 1327-1363. [CrossRef]
  8. Zhu Y, Ge M, Ma F, et al. Multifunctional Electrolyte Additives for Better Metal Batteries [J]. Advanced Functional Materials, 2024, 34(5): 2301964. [CrossRef]
  9. Yi X, Feng Y, Rao A M, et al. Quasi-Solid Aqueous Electrolytes for Low-Cost Sustainable Alkali-metal Batteries [J]. Advanced Materials, 2023, 35(29): 2302280. [CrossRef]
  10. Feng Y, Rao A M, Zhou J, et al. Selective Potassium Deposition Enables Dendrite-resistant Anodes for Ultrastable Potassium-Metal Batteries [J]. Advanced Materials, 2023, 35(30): 2300886. [CrossRef]
  11. Wang T, Sun J, Hua Y, et al. Planar and Dendrite-Free Zinc Deposition Enabled by Exposed Crystal Plane Optimization of Zinc Anode [J]. Energy Storage Materials, 2022, 53: 273-304. [CrossRef]
  12. Chen X, Sun W, Wang Y. Covalent Organic Frameworks for Next-Generation Batteries [J]. ChemElectroChem, 2020, 7(19): 3905-3926. [CrossRef]
  13. Shuai H, Xu J, Huang K. Progress in Retrospect of Electrolytes for Secondary Magnesium Batteries [J]. Coordination Chemistry Reviews, 2020, 422: 213478. [CrossRef]
  14. Meng Z, Foix D, Brun N, et al. Alloys to Replace Mg Anodes in Efficient and Practical Mg-Ion/SulfurBatteries [J]. ACS Energy Letters, 2019, 4(9): 2040-2044. [CrossRef]
  15. Liu J, Dong D, Caro A L, et al. Aqueous Electrolytes Reinforced by Mg and Ca Ions for Highly Reversible Fe Metal Batteries [J]. ACS Central Science, 2022, 8(6): 729-740. [CrossRef]
  16. Li H, Firby C J, Elezzabi A Y. Rechargeable Aqueous Hybrid Zn2+/Al3+ Electrochromic Batteries [J]. Joule, 2019, 3(9): 2268-2278. [CrossRef]
  17. Yi Z, Chen G, Hou F, et al. Strategies for The Stabilization of Zn Metal Anodes for Zn-Ion Batteries [J]. Advanced Energy Materials, 2021, 11(1): 2003065. [CrossRef]
  18. Xiao Y, Ren J, Li M, et al. Charge-Tuning Mediated Rapid Kinetics of Zinc Ions in Aqueous Zn-Ion Battery [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2023, 474: 145801. [CrossRef]
  19. Huang J, Li Y, Xie R, et al. Structural Engineering of Cathodes for Improved Zn-Ion Batteries [J]. Journal of Energy Chemistry, 2021, 58: 147-155. [CrossRef]
  20. Tian Y, An Y, Liu C, et al. Reversible Zinc-Based Anodes Enabled by Zincophilic Antimony Engineered Mxene for Stable and Dendrite-Free Aqueous Zinc Batteries [J]. Energy Storage Materials, 2021, 41: 343-353. [CrossRef]
  21. Fu X, Li G, Wang X, et al. The Etching Strategy of Zinc Anode to Enable high Performance Zinc-Ion Batteries [J]. Journal of Energy Chemistry, 2024, 88: 125-143. [CrossRef]
  22. Blanc L E, Kundu D, Nazar L F. Scientific Challenges for the Implementation of Zn-Ion Batteries [J]. Joule, 2020, 4(4): 771-799. [CrossRef]
  23. Li S, Wei X, Wu C, et al. Constructing Three-Dimensional Structured V2O5/Conductive Polymer Composite with Fast Ion/Electron Transfer Kinetics for Aqueous Zinc-Ion Battery [J]. ACS Applied Energy Materials, 2021, 4(4): 4208-4216. [CrossRef]
  24. Shao Y, Zeng J, Li J, et al. Sandwich Structure of 3D Porous Carbon and Water-Pillared V2O5 Nanosheets for Superior Zinc-Ion Storage Properties [J]. ChemElectroChem, 2021, 8(10): 1784-1791. [CrossRef]
  25. Yang Y, Tang Y, Liang S, et al. Transition metal Ion-Preintercalated V2O5 as High-performance Aqueous Zinc-Ion Battery Cathode with Broad Temperature Adaptability [J]. Nano Energy, 2019, 61: 617-625. [CrossRef]
  26. Yang M, Wang Z, Ben H, et al. Boosting the Zinc ion Storage Capacity and Cycling Stability of Interlayer-Expanded Vanadium Disulfide Through In-Situ Electrochemical Oxidation Strategy [J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2022, 607: 68-75. [CrossRef]
  27. Javed M S, Lei H, Wang Z, et al. 2D V2O5 Nanosheets as a Binder-free High-Energy Cathode for Ultrafast Aqueous and Flexible Zn-Ion Batteries [J]. Nano Energy, 2020, 70: 104573. [CrossRef]
  28. Lu Y, Wen Y, Huang F, et al. Rational Design and Demonstration of a High-Performance Flexible Zn/V2O5 Battery with Thin-Film Electrodes and Para-Polybenzimidazole Electrolyte Membrane [J]. Energy Storage Materials, 2020, 27: 418-425. [CrossRef]
  29. Wan F, Zhang L, Dai X, et al. Aqueous Rechargeable Zinc/Sodium Vanadate Batteries with Enhanced Performance from Simultaneous Insertion of Dual Carriers [J]. Nature Communications, 2018, 9(1): 520-529. [CrossRef]
  30. Lv T-T, Liu Y-Y, Wang H, et al. Crystal Water Enlarging the Interlayer Spacing of Ultrathin V2O5·4VO2·2.72H2O Nanobelts for High-Performance Aqueous Zinc-Ion Battery [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2021, 411: 128533. [CrossRef]
  31. Zhou S, Wu X, Du H, et al. Dual Metal Ions and Water Molecular Pre-Intercalated δ-MnO2 Spherical Microflowers for Aqueous Zinc Ion Batteries [J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2022, 623: 456-466. [CrossRef]
  32. Li R, Xing F, Li T, et al. Intercalated Polyaniline in V2O5 as a Unique Vanadium Oxide Bronze Cathode for Highly Stable Aqueous Zinc Ion Battery [J]. Energy Storage Materials, 2021, 38: 590-598. [CrossRef]
  33. Yin C, Pan C, Liao X, et al. Regulating the Interlayer Spacing of Vanadium Oxide by In Situ Polyaniline Intercalation Enables an Improved Aqueous Zinc-Ion Storage Performance [J]. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2021, 13(33): 39347-39354. [CrossRef]
  34. Du Y, Xu Y, Zhang Y, et al. Metal-Organic-Framework-Derived Cobalt-Vanadium Oxides with Tunable Compositions for High-Performance Aqueous Zinc-Ion Batteries [J]. Chemical Engineering , 2023, 457: 141162. [CrossRef]
  35. Yang B, Tamirat A G, Bin D, et al. Regulating Intercalation of Layered Compounds for Electrochemical Energy Storage and Electrocatalysis [J]. Advanced Functional Materials, 2021, 31(52): 2104543. [CrossRef]
  36. Liu N, Wu X, Fan L, et al. Intercalation Pseudocapacitive Zn2+ Storage with Hydrated Vanadium Dioxide toward Ultrahigh Rate Performance [J]. Advanced Materials, 2020, 32(42): 1908420. [CrossRef]
  37. Tang H, Peng Z, Wu L, et al. Vanadium-Based Cathode Materials for Rechargeable Multivalent Batteries: Challenges and Opportunities [J]. Electrochemical Energy Reviews, 2018, 1(2): 169-199. [CrossRef]
  38. Wang F, Sun W, Shadike Z, et al. How Water Accelerates Bivalent Ion Diffusion at the Electrolyte/Electrode Interface [J]. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2018, 57(37): 11978-11981. [CrossRef]
  39. Li W, Han C, Gu Q, et al. Electron Delocalization and Dissolution-Restraint in Vanadium Oxide Superlattices to Boost Electrochemical Performance of Aqueous Zinc-Ion Batteries [J]. Advanced Energy Materials, 2020, 10(48): 2001852. [CrossRef]
  40. Kumankuma-Sarpong J, Guo W, Fu Y. Yttrium Vanadium Oxide–Poly (3, 4-ethylenedioxythiophene) Composite Cathode Material for Aqueous Zinc-Ion Batteries [J]. Small Methods, 2021, 5(9): 2100544. [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang K, Hu Z, Liu X, et al. FeSe2 Microspheres as a High-Performance Anode Material for Na-Ion Batteries [J]. Advanced Materials, 2015, 27(21): 3305-3309. [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) SEM image of pure V2O5; (b,c) SEM images of PANI-V2O5, showing its microstructural changes; (d) EDS image of PANI-V2O5, illustrating the elemental composition and distribution.
Figure 1. (a) SEM image of pure V2O5; (b,c) SEM images of PANI-V2O5, showing its microstructural changes; (d) EDS image of PANI-V2O5, illustrating the elemental composition and distribution.
Preprints 153849 g001
Figure 2. (a) TEM image of V₂O₅ without PANI doping; (b) TEM image of PANI-V₂O₅ after PANI doping.
Figure 2. (a) TEM image of V₂O₅ without PANI doping; (b) TEM image of PANI-V₂O₅ after PANI doping.
Preprints 153849 g002
Figure 3. Characterization of pure V₂O₅ and PANI-V₂O₅ composite materials: (a) X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns; (b) Raman spectroscopy comparative analysis.
Figure 3. Characterization of pure V₂O₅ and PANI-V₂O₅ composite materials: (a) X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns; (b) Raman spectroscopy comparative analysis.
Preprints 153849 g003
Figure 4. XPS analysis results. (a) Full XPS spectrum of the PANI-V2O5 sample; (b) High-resolution N 1s spectrum of PANI-V2O5; (c) High-resolution O 1s spectrum of PANI-V2O5; (d) High-resolution V 2p spectrum of PANI-V2O5.
Figure 4. XPS analysis results. (a) Full XPS spectrum of the PANI-V2O5 sample; (b) High-resolution N 1s spectrum of PANI-V2O5; (c) High-resolution O 1s spectrum of PANI-V2O5; (d) High-resolution V 2p spectrum of PANI-V2O5.
Preprints 153849 g004
Figure 5. (a) Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms of PANI-V₂O₅ and V₂O₅; (b) Corresponding pore size distribution curves.
Figure 5. (a) Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms of PANI-V₂O₅ and V₂O₅; (b) Corresponding pore size distribution curves.
Preprints 153849 g005
Figure 6. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves of PANI-V₂O₅ at a scan rate of 0.1 mV·s⁻¹.
Figure 6. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves of PANI-V₂O₅ at a scan rate of 0.1 mV·s⁻¹.
Preprints 153849 g006
Figure 7. Comparison of electrochemical performance between PANI-V₂O₅ and V₂O₅. (a) First charge-discharge curves of PANI-V₂O₅ at different current densities; (b) Comparison of charge-discharge curves of PANI-V₂O₅ and V₂O₅ at 0.1 A g⁻¹; (c) Rate performance of the two materials at different current densities; (d) Cycling stability and coulombic efficiency trends of PANI-V₂O₅ and V₂O₅ at 1 A g⁻¹ current density.
Figure 7. Comparison of electrochemical performance between PANI-V₂O₅ and V₂O₅. (a) First charge-discharge curves of PANI-V₂O₅ at different current densities; (b) Comparison of charge-discharge curves of PANI-V₂O₅ and V₂O₅ at 0.1 A g⁻¹; (c) Rate performance of the two materials at different current densities; (d) Cycling stability and coulombic efficiency trends of PANI-V₂O₅ and V₂O₅ at 1 A g⁻¹ current density.
Preprints 153849 g007
Figure 8. Electrochemical kinetic characteristics of the PANI-V₂O₅ electrode. (a) Cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves of PANI-V₂O₅ at different scan rates; (b) Log(i) vs. Log(v) relationship curve corresponding to the oxidation and reduction peaks in the CV; (ce) Pseudocapacitive contribution separation curves at scan rates of 0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 mV s⁻¹; (f) Comparison of capacitive storage and diffusion-controlled contributions at different scan rates.
Figure 8. Electrochemical kinetic characteristics of the PANI-V₂O₅ electrode. (a) Cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves of PANI-V₂O₅ at different scan rates; (b) Log(i) vs. Log(v) relationship curve corresponding to the oxidation and reduction peaks in the CV; (ce) Pseudocapacitive contribution separation curves at scan rates of 0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 mV s⁻¹; (f) Comparison of capacitive storage and diffusion-controlled contributions at different scan rates.
Preprints 153849 g008
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated