Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

From Authenticity to Sustainability: The Role of Authentic Cultural and Consumer Knowledge in Shaping Green Consumerism and Behavioral Intention to Gastronomy in Heritage Restaurants in Hail, Saudi Arabia

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

04 March 2025

Posted:

06 March 2025

You are already at the latest version

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between perceived authenticity, green consumerism, and behavioral intention within the context of heritage restaurants in Hail, Saudi Arabia. By integrating Cognitive Appraisal Theory (CAT) and the Stimulus-Organism-Response (SOR) framework, the research explores how authenticity perceptions influence both cultural and gastronomic experiences and contribute to sustainable consumption behavior. The study also investigates the moderating role of consumer knowledge in enhancing green consumerism and its subsequent impact on behavioral intention to dine at heritage restaurants. Using a mixed-methods approach, the study first conducted content analysis on online reviews to identify key attributes that shape authenticity perceptions. Subsequently, a structural equation modeling (SEM) approach was applied to survey data collected from 417 patrons of heritage restaurants in Hail. The findings confirm that perceived authenticity significantly enhances consumers' cultural and gastronomic experiences, which in turn fosters green consumerism and strengthens behavioral intention to visit authentic restaurants. Furthermore, green consumerism acts as a key mediator between authenticity, cultural experiences, and purchase intention. Consumer knowledge further moderates this relationship, amplifying the positive effect of green consumerism on behavioral intention. The study contributes to the growing literature on sustainable gastronomy tourism by demonstrating the crucial interplay between authenticity, sustainability, and consumer knowledge in the heritage restaurant sector. It also offers practical recommendations for restaurant managers, policymakers, and tourism marketers to enhance the authentic dining experience while promoting environmentally responsible behavior. By fostering awareness of cultural and environmental values, heritage restaurants can play a pivotal role in advancing sustainable tourism development in Hail and beyond.

Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

As with today’s restaurant sectors, it has become very important to provide an authentic dining experience or service real life restaurant to become more competitive [1]. In this study, the concept of authenticity refers to both the tangible of the meal and other more intangible features associated with dining, including the quality of service and the ambiance [2,3]. Currently, restaurants aim at creating an impression that makes consumers loyal to their places by creating a uniqueness, which is an important factor considered when marking the restaurants’ authenticity [4].
Authenticity is a complex construct that has considerable influence over consumer choice to varying extents in the field of heritage restaurants [5,6]. Heritage restaurants attract consumers due to authenticity of cultural entertainment, as these are perceived to be the lifestyles that embrace truth [7]. This is a major reason why customers run to ethnic and heritage restaurants with the aim of getting the real experience or culture of that nation [8]. In the context of heritage restaurants, the appearance of authenticity plays the role of an essential group characteristic ensuring the directions of consumers’ intentions and establishing the general impression [9]. Authenticity is judged according to the set perception of a particular culture or heritage as passing through the consumer scrutiny test [6].
Consumer knowledge is a critical factor in improving the sustainability of restaurants and the dining experience [10]. Informed consumers will pay more respect and worth to the concept of authenticity of eating out, and the hard work invested to endorse the historical and culturally historical worth [11]. Such an understanding may help amplify acceptance of restaurants that follow sustainable business practices because the consumer public understands that the roles of authenticity and sustainability are intertwined [12]. Consumers, for their part, can increase the enjoyment of dining by using their knowledge of where food comes from and why, and what the proper ways for preparing it are as pointed out by restaurants and cafes [13]. Through an enhancement of cultural reasoning restaurants are able to offer their customers a far richer experience, allowing them to gain a far better understanding of the situation they find themselves in [14].
As the role and importance of both authenticity and sustainably in gastronomy and hospitality industries have been established in past studies, there is a shortage of studies measuring the relationship between two concepts specifically in the context of heritage restaurants. Previous studies examined history, the locations, and size/ ownership type as drivers of authentic cultural/ gastronomic experience [15], however, there is no study that investigates the role of perceived authenticity in shaping it. While studies have explored the role of perceived authenticity in influencing positive emotions, value [5,16], brand awareness, brand image, perceived quality [17], and intention to purchase [6], its connection directly to green consumerism and how it ultimately shapes behavioral intentions remains underexplored.
Another understudied line of research is whether consumer knowledge will moderate the proposed relationships between green consumerism and behavioral intentions in authentic restaurants. This gap translates to the question of how different amounts of consumer knowledge about the restaurant’s heritage might be influencing consumers’ perceptions and decision-making. Therefore, this study has four objectives. It aims to (1) analyze the impact of perceived authenticity on authentic cultural and gastronomic experiences in Hail’s heritage restaurants, (2) assess the role of green consumerism in linking between both perceived authenticity, authentic cultural and behavioral intention, (3) examine consumer knowledge as a moderating factor between green consumerism and behavioral intention. (4) propose strategies for enhancing sustainability in gastronomy tourism in Hail.
The findings from this research present the following useful implications to the existing body of knowledge. First, it helps to fill the existing literature knowledge gap for heritage restaurants dealing with authenticity, in Hail, Saudi Arabia. Although, there are a number of prior research investigating authenticity in different restaurant contexts including ethnic restaurants [8,11] and traditional brand restaurants [4], but no prior research has focused on heritage restaurants. This study fills this gap by studying the impact of perceived authenticity on the experiences of consumers in these authentic dining establishments.
Secondly, it extends the literature on perceived authenticity and green consumerism. The results of the prior research suggest that authenticity has a positive correlation with other variables such as perceived quality, value, and behavioral intentions [5,17]. Though very limited empirical investigation has been made to establish the structural relationship between authenticity and green consumerism. This research fills this gap by examining how authenticity perceptions may influence consumers’ perceptions and behaviors regarding sustainability in the domain of dining.
Third, it adds to the scant literature on how consumer knowledge impacts the association between green consumerism and behavioral intentions. Although studies such as [NO_PRINTED_FORM] [10] has discussed the role of consumer knowledge regarding other experience dimensions of other experiences in restaurants, the role of consumer knowledge as a moderator between green consumerism and behavioral intentions is comparatively under-researched. This study responds to this by analyzing how levels of food and culture related knowledge influence consumers’ reactions to sustainability interventions in heritage restaurants.
Finally, this study provides applied knowledge for advancing sustainability in gastronomy tourism in Hail. The study’s implications are that knowledge about the culture and consumers can be used to market heritage restaurants and promote environmentally friendly consumption behavior among consumers. This has implications for the sustainable development of the tourism industry in the region, especially at a time when the world is turning more focused to more responsible tourism practices.

2. Literature Review

2.1. Theoretical Framework

People’s assessments of a culinary experience are influenced by their desire to eat regional and ethnic cuisine [18]. Cognitive appraisal theory (CAT) uses cognitive and emotive assessments to find differences in consuming experiences [19]. In particular, cognitive evaluation is suggested to be the mental processes that link emotional reactions to stimuli [20]. According to [NO_PRINTED_FORM] [21], an appraisal is a “cognitive process [and] the way an individual defines and evaluates relationships with the environment.” Different subconscious assessments of a stimulus make up the appraisal process (also known as appraisal dimensions), and aspects including novelty, goal relevance, goal congruence, and certainty have been studied as factors that influence certain emotions [22]. Despite the rarity of CAT adoption in food tourism research, studies have looked at a number of topics, including hostility [23], feelings in online reviews [24], and reasons for buying organic wine [25]. Despite the significance of these difficulties, there are few research that look at authenticity assessments [5].
In contrast to earlier research on food tourism, which suggests perceived authenticity as an antecedent factor of emotions (see [NO_PRINTED_FORM] [26], we contend, based on CAT, that food authenticity is an outcome of emotional responses arising from authentic food consumption. Food authenticity is a cognitive belief about authentic food experiences during travel. Therefore, visitors’ perceptions of the good or negative feelings they get from eating (in)authentic cuisine might influence their assessments of authenticity [27]. Emotions influence cognitive assessments of authenticity, as the branding research indicates [27]. As a result, the conceptual framework and suggested hypotheses for this study are based on CAT.
There are many theoretical frameworks that are often used to explain green consumption. Notably, the theory of planned behavior and its expansions [28] are widely used [29]. Other theories include norm activation theory [30] and the stimulus–organism–behavior–consequence model [31]. Furthermore, the social cognitive theory [32] and the value-belief-norm theory [33] have been used. The green theory has been suggested for analyzing green buying behavior [34], and some research combine many theories, such as the value-belief-norm theory and the theory of planned behavior [35]. Although the majority of the research focuses on positive features, there is increasing interest in examining negative aspects via the application of the signaling theory [36], the theory of planned behavior, and the theory of reasoned action [37].
The three main elements of the Stimulus-Organism-Response (SOR) theory—introduced by [NO_PRINTED_FORM] [38] and expanded upon by [NO_PRINTED_FORM] [39]—provide a framework for examining user behavior. According to this theory, an individual’s internal or perceptual state may be influenced by external environmental signals, which may then result in a behavioral response. While [NO_PRINTED_FORM] [40] found that green consumerism is influenced by consumer confidence and environmental consciousness, [NO_PRINTED_FORM] [41] used the stimulus-organization-response (S-O-R) model to investigate green consumption intention in rural tourism. The S-O-R paradigm has been utilized by researchers to examine the ecological, cognitive, and economic aspects that influence the consumption of green garments [42] as well as the effect of green advertising on consumers’ intentions to buy energy-saving items [43]. This study uses the S-O-R framework to examine the stimulus that leads to customer perception of green consumption, factors that both encourage and hinder green consumption, and the consequences of green consumption. Previous studies have used the S-O-R framework to identify the motivating factors for green consumption. We also examine the elements that promote green consumption and lead to eat at authentic restaurants specially in Hail of Saudi Arabia.

2.2. Authentic Gastronomic Experience

Gastronomy has grown in importance as a component of tourism experiences and frequently offers visitors interesting and unforgettable experiences [44]. It is crucial for gourmet locations to produce authentic culinary experiences since gastronomists are more concerned with authenticity than other visitors [45]. What makes food and dining experiences authentic was the main focus of the early research on the relationship between authenticity and gastronomy. Food (such as regional products and traditional cooking techniques) [46], the physical environment (such as décor) [47], and the social environment (such as coworkers and other patrons) [48] are all crucial components.
However, from a comprehensive destination viewpoint, more study should be done on genuine experiences and gastronomy [49]. Multiple businesses and stakeholders provide tourists with products and services that shape their overall and genuine experiences in a destination [50]. In the context of gastronomy tourism, multiple stakeholders also shape tourists’ gastronomic experiences (Richards, 2021). Even while authenticity plays a big part in influencing travelers’ inclinations to visit a place [51], little is known about what makes for genuine culinary experiences [52].

2.3. Development of Hypotheses

2.3.1. Authenticity

The Latin term authenticus and the Greek word authentikos, which denote a feeling of reliability, are the sources of the word “authenticity,” according [NO_PRINTED_FORM] [53]. According to [NO_PRINTED_FORM] [54], it is used to characterize anything that is authentic, unique, innocent, sincere, honest, and unaffected. There is currently no consensus on the precise concept of authenticity, despite the fact that several scholars have given the word associations and denotations [55]. However, some scholars advanced our knowledge of authenticity by distinguishing three dimensions: existential, constructive, and objective [56,57]. Specifically, the objectivist viewpoint views authenticity as the source of an object or the opinions of experts [58]. According to [NO_PRINTED_FORM] [59] and [NO_PRINTED_FORM] [60], the constructive viewpoint is a projection of one’s own views, expectations, and beliefs that is primarily staged and negotiated. The existential component examines authenticity as being genuine to oneself and is associated with the consumer’s experience (Jamal & Hill, 2004).
The terms indexical and iconic authenticity were first used by [NO_PRINTED_FORM] [62]. Indexical authenticity refers to anything that is authentic and genuine but not an imitation, whilst iconic authenticity refers to something that is very similar to or near the original. Authenticity is best understood as an evaluation conducted by a certain assessor in a specific situation [62]. They emphasized that people’s perceptions and interpretations of objects and expressions determine whether a restaurant is authentic or inauthentic [62]. This was in line with several studies [63,64] that showed that customers’ perceptions of the same restaurant may differ in terms of authenticity. Furthermore, [NO_PRINTED_FORM] [65] pointed out that the authenticity of Saudi Arabia cuisine is subjective, especially when it comes to the environment of Saudi Arabia cuisine. Therefore, the constructive authenticity of Saudi Arabia traditional branded restaurants as viewed by customers is the main emphasis of this article.

2.3.2. Effect of Perceived Authenticity on Consumers’ Authentic Gastronomic and Cultural Experiences

A food product’s lengthy history is one aspect of visitors’ genuine experiences [66]. Better opinions of dining value and more positive behavioral intentions are the results of positive emotions associated with authenticity [67]. A theoretical model of the effect of perceived authenticity on consumers’ authentic gastronomic and culture experiences, drawing on cognitive appraisal theory (CAT). CAT, which focuses on the cognitive process involved in emotion elicitation, provides a theoretical lens to explain the antecedents of the various emotions evoked by food experiences [68].
The substantial positive impact of object-related authenticity on existential authenticity was studied by [NO_PRINTED_FORM] [69] in their consumer-based model of authenticity. This relationship has been replicated in settings such as museums and heritage sites [70] and dining establishments [71]. Consumers’ need to rediscover their origins and arouse feelings of nostalgia may be met by strategically integrating historic qualities into product offers with a particular geographical and temporal identity [71]. However, there hasn’t been much empirical study done on the link between perceived authenticity and consumers’ authentic gastronomic and cultural experiences. Therefore, we suggest:
H1. 
Perceived authenticity positively influences consumers’ authentic gastronomic and cultural experiences.

2.3.3. Green Consumerism

Customers are becoming ardent supporters of socially conscious conduct as a result of their growing concerns about the negative effects of corporate operations on the environment [72]. Green consumerism is defined as consumer awareness of the climate change dilemma and actions or movements to preserve the environment and lessen the harmful effects of consumption [73]. The influence of green marketing and green practices for restaurants has been the subject of several studies, according to a review of prior research [74].
Customers have positive opinions about green firms as a result of environmental concerns. The underlying idea [75] states that positive attitudes might influence customers’ behavioral intentions [76]. Researchers often claim that customers’ purchasing choices are influenced by their perceptions of the efficacy of eco-friendly behavior, green consumption patterns in daily life, environmental awareness, and a company’s green reputation [77]. Customers’ behavioral intentions are positively impacted by a restaurant’s green image [78]. However, the criteria that customers take into account while choosing a restaurant might fluctuate depending on the kind of restaurant and various market groups [79]. According to a study by [NO_PRINTED_FORM] [74] on how Generation Y views green restaurants, millennials are more interested in sustainable food consumption, in-store recycling bins, and bio-based materials, such as bio-plastics for food packaging, disposable cups, and reusable mugs, than they are in green design or on-site energy efficiency. Additionally, research indicates that millennials are inclined to pay extra for green practices [80]. Businesses that prioritize sustainability, including restaurants and hotels, may draw in devoted eco-friendly clients who come back and/or make further purchases [81]. But according to the reference, Generation Y is less devoted to hotels or travel websites and is more eager to explore new places and have unique experiences. An effective connection should be the foundation of researchers’ attempts to boost Generation Y customers’ loyalty [82]. There are no previous studies that investigated the effect of perceived authenticity on green consumerism in restaurants. Therefore, the following hypothesis is:
H2: 
Perceived authenticitypositively influences green consumerism in authentic restaurants in Hail, Saudi Arabia.
H3: 
Consumers’ authentic gastronomic and cultural experiences positively influence green consumerism in authentic restaurants in Hail, Saudi Arabia.
According to current research, the most significant explanatory factor of willing to pay in green restaurants is demonstrating care for the environment [83]. For example, [NO_PRINTED_FORM] [84] found that 68.3% of respondents were inclined to spend more for environmentally friendly restaurant items. According to other research, a high willing to pay level is a result of participation in social and environmental actions [85]. In addition, Healthiness is the most significant element that influences consumers’ choices about what to eat when they have a strong intention to buy. It has been shown that food flavor is a significant motivator when making food purchases, therefore healthiness is not the only noteworthy feature of food that affects the choice to buy [86]. Taste impressions have a considerable impact on customers’ intents to purchase, according to research by [NO_PRINTED_FORM] [87]. Consumers’ perceptions of food quality are growing, and it has been shown to be a crucial component in boosting diners’ inclinations to return [88]. Although there are previous studies that examine food tastiness and healthiness effect on purchase intention, there are no studies that investigate the impact of green consumerism on authentic restaurant purchase. Therefore, the following hypothesis is:
<b>H4:
Green consumerism positively influences behavioral intention to eat at authentic restaurants in Hail, Saudi Arabia.
According to a number of studies, green consumption has emerged as a fundamental consumer value and belief in contemporary culture [89]. Because of this, modern customers often prioritize green goods and services and take proactive steps to protect the environment [90]. According to S-O-R, green hotels and their environmental activities may trigger consumers to reflect as green and responsible consumers [91]. Consumers may be prompted to choose and return to green hotels in this situation by the hotels’ ethical and environmentally friendly practices. Customers’ attitudes and ideas regarding environmental protection and the environmental actions of green hotels serve as signals that activate and encourage their green consumption value [92]. According to studies, customers are encouraged to remain and return to green hotels because they believe that the perceptions of green hotel practices activate and construct the green consumption value [90]. There are no previous studies that investigate the mediating role of green consumerism in the relationship between perceived authenticity and purchasing intention in authentic restaurants, and between consumers’ authentic gastronomic and cultural experiences and purchasing intention in authentic restaurants, especially in Hail of Saudi Arabia. Therefore, the following hypotheses are:
H5: 
Green consumption value positively mediates the relationship between perceived authenticity and purchasing intention in authentic restaurants.
H6: 
Green consumption value positively mediates the relationship between consumers’ authentic gastronomic/ cultural experiences and purchasing intention in authentic restaurants.

2.3.4. Consumer Knowledge

[NO_PRINTED_FORM] [93] contend that the relationship between perceived authenticity and behavioral intention is not always positive and that familiarity acts as a moderator between authenticity perception and behavioral intention without examining the effect of familiarity on customers’ authenticity perceptions. Perceived authenticity and behavioral intention are positively correlated for patrons who are acquainted with the ethnic food (for example, consumers who are familiar with Saudi cuisine). However, there is no favorable link for patrons who are unfamiliar with the ethnic food (for example, eating tradition food of Saudi Arabia). One possible explanation is that customers with less expertise are more prone than those with more knowledge to rate the authentic restaurants. Nonetheless, knowledgeable consumers who has green consumerism habits may assess the quality of food in authentic restaurants. Therefore, the following hypothesis is:
H7: 
The customer’s prior knowledge moderates the effect of green consumerism on the purchasing intention to eat at authentic restaurants in Hail, Saudi Arabia.
The hypothesized model is demonstrated in Figure 1.

3. Research Design

3.1. Methods

This research used a mixed-methods methodology, using qualitative and quantitative techniques successively to investigate the key characteristics of restaurants authenticity perception on green consumerism and purchasing intention. To compile consumer assessments of the main factors of environment authenticity, food authenticity, historical and cultural value, nostalgia and brand value, study 1 first gathered internet reviews and rating information for the authentic restaurant in Hail using content analysis. To determine which features patrons value most and how they affect their overall assessment of the authentic restaurants, a regression analysis was then conducted on the rating data. To develop relevant study hypotheses, Study 2 built a theoretical model that covers the most valued features, the variables affecting them, and their association with the other variables. Customers of Hail were surveyed using a questionnaire, and data analysis and hypothesis testing were done using the structural equation model. Both exploratory and confirmatory research issues may be addressed by the mixed-methods approach, which also offers a wider range of divergent and/or complementary viewpoints and stronger conclusions than a single method or worldview [94].

3.2. The Study Case: Authentic Restaurants in Hail

The purpose of this research was to evaluate the perception of authenticity, green consumerism and purchasing intention to authentic restaurants that come with producing traditional culinary dishes in Hail, Saudi Arabia. Because of Saudi Arabia’s expanding tourism sector and the relative novelty of the hospitality sector providing visitors with traditional cuisine, this research was conducted there [95].

4. Study 1: Exploring Key Attributes of Authentic Restaurants

4.1. Research Process

Online reviews from Tripadvisor, Yelp, and Google My Business were used as the data source for this investigation. Users may score a restaurant based on four criteria: food, atmosphere, service, and overall assessment. They can also share their experiences via text, images, and videos. Researchers gathered customer reviews of authentic restaurants in Hail from 2020 to 2024. User IDs, review timestamps, overall restaurant ratings, detailed review texts, and evaluations for the restaurant’s cuisine, atmosphere, and service were among the data. Reviews were written in Arabic and English. After that, an Excel spreadsheet including these evaluations was created for further examination.
For the authentic restaurant in Hail online review websites, a total of 500 reviews were gathered. 420 reviews had ratings of 4 or higher, while the total restaurant ratings varied from 1 to 5. Both the customer reviews and the associated ratings data were examined by the researchers. Every analysis was first conducted in Arabic and then translated into English.
Using the QDA Miner 2024, content analysis was performed on the empirical study data, building on the literature from the first review. In this research, the methodology described by [NO_PRINTED_FORM] [96] was used to create exhaustive and mutually exclusive categories. To find cases where codes appeared together or in close proximity to one another, co-occurrence analysis—also carried out in QDA Miner (2024)—was used. In the end, this analysis made it easier to categorize the authentic restaurants shown in the case study by enabling us to determine the connections between the codes and cases.

4.2. Coding Customer Reviews

In order to create the codes and categories, the current study adopted the qualitative content analysis approach involving the analysis of the customers’ reviews of heritage restaurants. Firstly, the data were reviewed several times to build a passive familiarity and collect an overall impression concerning the data provided. A combination of deductive and inductive coding methods was used, guided by pre-identified categories: The seven criteria are Environment Authenticity (EA), Food Authenticity (FA), Historical/Cultural Value (HC), Nostalgia (NOS), Brand Value (BV). Specific phrases and constantly mentioned keywords in the reviews were detected and as far as the context was concerned these preliminary categories were assigned. Phrases concerning elements of the physical environment or traditional setting were coded EA, those concerning the quality, individuality, or tradition of the food were coded FA. The same way the HC tag was used to archive observations related to cultural experiences or heritage, while speculations in a narrative or sharing of an individual experience such as memory triggered by or related to the narrative but different from HC was categorized as NOS. Finally, opinion samples involving references to the reputation, recommendation or popularity of the restaurant were categorized under BV. Such intensive coding helped in a way to sort the qualitative data into relevant code groups and subgroups systematically. (See Table 1).

4.3. Results and Discussion

The word cloud depicted in Figure 2 summarizes the specific terms frequently used by the consumers in their reviews about heritage restaurants in Hail city, Saudi Arabia. Here, we can see that the larger and bolder words represent higher occurrence and importance, such as “restaurant,” “food,” and “delicious,” “excellence”, and “good” which all speak so much about customer satisfaction and quality of food. Other significant words include: “clean”, “service”, “recommend”, “taste”, and “family” underlining aspects of cleanness, service and appropriateness of the venue for group gatherings like families. On the other hand, terms like “bad”, “price”, “reasonable” signify an issue or a negative analysis about the price and customers’ complaining. The word cloud gives a comprehensive and qualitative view of key perception and experiences of consumers and reflects their expectation from heritage dining establishments in the region.
The dendrogram in Figure 2 also illustrates the hierarchical clustering of key attributes Mean, Median, Standard Deviation, coefficient of Variation that representing cultural and gastronomic experiences in heritage restaurants in Hail, KSA determined by Jaccard coefficient. These are on the left-hand side and grouped by themes, such as ambiance (blue), cultural significance (orange), nostalgia (red), and reputation (cyan). The clustering is carried out based on how often the terms occur together; therefore, we have terms such as ‘Authentic decor and atmosphere’ next to ‘Beautiful place’ in the same cluster as well as ‘Delicious food’. In the same manner, terms such as “Cultural experience,” and “Preserves history of the place” are framed which also comes under the same context of the heritage. Haven brings back memories and just like old times highlight end users being familiar with the product while reputation of the restaurant and highly recommended by others, portrays social proof. Understanding the agglomeration structure is useful to see how these themes intersect to explain the consumers’ perceptions and behavioral intentions towards gastronomic experiences.
Figure 4 shows the network map of the important parameters associated with heritage restaurants’ gastronomes and cultural offering for which connection strength is based on correlation coefficients. Ones are specific features and twos are the connections between the ones or the correlation of features, and thicker lines meaning higher correlation. Thus, such attributes as, for example, “Highly recommended by others” and “Popular in Hail” are absolutely consistent, r =1.000, and this means that consumers also associate them. As with the other examples, “Preserves history of the place” and “Cultural experience” substantiate close connection -- drawing attention to the cultural value of experience. On the other hand, the link between “Authentic decor and atmosphere” and the choice of “Reflects the heritage” is not very strong at 0.500, underlining importance of heritage in culture. It represents connections between attributes and determine which ones are linked with each other, which creates a focus on the importance of cultural, affectionate and word-of-mouth clusters in understanding the consumer behavioral intentions towards heritage restaurants.

5. Study 2: Influencing Factors of the Key Attributes and Their Impact on Customer Purchasing Intentions

5.1. Questionnaire Design

This study’s questionnaire was broken up into five sections. Five major components were assessed in the first section: brand value, historical and cultural value, food authenticity, environment authenticity, and nostalgia. Environmental authenticity was assessed using a five-item scale by Jang et al. (2012) and Liu et al. (2018). Food authenticity was assessed using a five-item scale by Jang et al. (2012) and Liu et al. (2018). Moreover, historical and cultural value was measured using a four-item scale by Chen et al. (2020). Nostalgia evaluates customers’ judgments of the association with the past and constructed from Fritz et al. (2017). Chen et al. (2018) developed scales for brand value, with five items. Furthermore, authentic cultural experience/ gastronomic experience, was measured using a scale by Kim & Kim, 2020, which included four items. Furthermore, green consumerism was measured using five-items from Riva et al. (2022). Consumer Knowledge was measured by four-items from Song and Kim (2022). Finally, behavioral intention was measured by three-items from Jang et al. (2012) and Chen et al. (2020).
The scales were translated and back-translated because the study was carried out in an Arabic environment. One of the authors first translated from English to Arabic using a forward translation. The translated scale was then examined and debated by a group of multilingual specialists who make sure it took into consideration Arabic language habits and cognitive processes in order to preserve the measurements’ accuracy. The back translation was done by a competent, independent multilingual translator to finish the procedure. A five-point Likert scale was used to score each item, with 1 denoting “strongly disagree” and 5 denoting “strongly agree.” Demographic data, including gender, age, education level, monthly income, and frequency of restaurant visits, were gathered in the second section of the survey.

5.2. Data Collection

Participants were the patrons of the real restaurants in Hail, Saudi Arabia, where the study was carried out. We distributed and collected the questionnaires immediately by intercepting patrons within the restaurant and using a one-to-one approach. We contacted patrons after their dinner to ask them to voluntarily participate in the survey after getting approval from the restaurant management, who also recommended that researchers eat there. As a thank you, respondents were given modest gifts such as juice or mineral water. With 417 valid surveys out of 488 distributed, the validity percentage was 85.4%.
The gender ratio of the respondents was almost equal, with males comprising 54.92% and females making up 45.08%. A significant portion, specifically 86%, fell within the age range of 18 to 25. The education levels were notably elevated, with a significant portion (64.75%) possessing bachelor’s degrees, 26.38% having completed high school, and 6.72% achieving a master’s degree or higher. In terms of monthly income, 48.68% reported earnings below 3,000 SAR, 10.79% indicated earnings between 3,000 SAR and 5,500 SAR, while 26.14% chose not to disclose their income. A significant majority of respondents, specifically 82.25%, identified as students.

5.3. Data Analysis

The research used partial least squares structural equation modeling to analyze data. PLS-SEM modeling and research are becoming more widespread in numerous sectors [97,98]. With SmartPLS v.3, construct reliability and validity were tested. Second, the structural model was examined for path coefficient significance, R2 (determination coefficient), and endogenous predictive relevance (Q2). SmartPLS software tests moderated mediating impact last.

5.3.1. Measurement Model Analysis

The reflecting measuring model is the one used in this investigation. The reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity of this kind of model are usually evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis with maximum likelihood estimation. Table 2 illustrates that the model structure’s Cronbach’s α (CA) is more than 0.7, the cutoff point the model must surpass in order to be deemed dependable. Furthermore, the composite reliability (CR) scores for all constructions above the 0.7 criterion, ranging from 0.818 to 0.960. Consequently, the items for each variable exhibit a high degree of internal consistency and repeatability of the results.
Convergent validity was evaluated in this research using the composite reliability (CR), average variance extraction (AVE) criteria, and index of factor loading. Standardized factor loadings of 0.7 or higher, AVE values of 0.5 or higher, and CR values of 0.7 or higher taken together often suggest an appropriate degree of convergent validity. In exploratory study, a lower limit of 0.5 to 0.6 may also be appropriate, even if 0.7 is regarded as the norm [99]. The outer loading value in this study, which is shown in Table 2, satisfies every requirement listed. Additionally, VE and CR values follow the previously mentioned guidelines. Consequently, it is possible to thoroughly demonstrate the study model’s convergence.
We investigated discriminant validity by comparing the square root values of AVE with the correlation coefficients between constructs using the Fornell-Larcker criteria. It should be mentioned that the correlation coefficient between constructs should never be more than the AVE square root value of the constructs [100]. This measuring model is thought to have discriminant validity because it meets the previously stated condition, as seen in Table 3.

5.3.2. Structural Equation Model and Hypotheses Analysis

The research that followed began by examining the collinearity problem in the structural model. The variance inflation factor (VIF) value was used to evaluate the collinearity problem; if the VIF value is less than 5, it means that collinearity has no effect on the structural model. All of the VIF values in this investigation were less than 5, as shown in Table 2, suggesting that the collinearity has no effect on the structural model.
The findings, which are shown in Table 4 and Figure 5, showed that Perceived Authenticity had a significant and positive impact on the Authentic cultural experience/ gastronomic experience (β = 0.548; t = 8.034), Perceived authenticity has a significant and positive effect on green consumerism (β = 0.316; t = 4.166), and Authentic cultural experience/ gastronomic experience has a significant and positive effect on Green consumerism (β = 0.517; t = 6.788). H1, H2, and H3 are supported by these findings. Green consumerism had a positive and significant impact on behavioral intention (β = 0.333; t = 4.632; p = 0.000). H4 is thus supported. The findings demonstrated that all independent variables had appropriate effect sizes on their intended dependent variables (0.127 < F2 ≤ 0.429), taking into account Cohen (2013) recommendations about effect size using the F square test.
Furthermore, the mediation effects of green consumerism on the relationships between perceived authenticity and behavioral intention and between authentic cultural experience/ gastronomic experience and behavioral intention were examined using a mediation test (Table 4). Results showed that green consumerism significantly and positively mediated the link between perceived authenticity and behavioral intention (effect 0.164; t = 4.430; p = 0.002) and between authentic cultural experience/ gastronomic experience and behavioral intention (effect = 0.172; t = 2.31; p = 0.003). As a consequence, H5 and H6 are accepted.
Furthermore, the evaluation of the moderating effects, as shown in Table 4 and Figure 6, showed that the consumer knowledge supports H7 by enhancing the considerable impact of green consumerism on behavioral intention (β = 0.146, t = 4.053, and p = 0.019).

6. Discussion and Implications

This study contributes to the understanding of the impact of perceived authenticity for improved green consumerism and consumption patterns of the consumers in heritage restaurants in Hail, Saudi Arabia. The analysis validates the hypothesis that perceived authenticity contributes towards constructive culinary journey and cultural experience of the consumers (H1). This is in line with earlier findings that have underscored authenticity as major antecedent to consumer satisfaction and customer engagement in dining environments [16,69]. When applied to the study of heritage restaurants, this research restates the significance of authenticity in constructing engaging and valued dining experiences.
Furthermore, the study supports the hypothesized positive association between perceived authenticity and green consumerism (H2) following prior research on the association between authenticity and environmentally responsible behaviors [5,11]. The study’s findings indicate that where consumers have an authentic perception that a restaurant embraces the culture of the society, they are likely to address sustainable dining. According to the results of this studies, Authentic cultural experience/ gastronomic experience deemed important for green consumerism (H3). These findings also support the notion of authenticity as enhancing both hedonic and utilitarian outcomes and enhancing pro-environmental consciousness consistent with Cognitive Appraisal Theory, proposed by [NO_PRINTED_FORM] [21].
The study validates that perceived green consumerism has a strong positive correlation with the behavioral intentions of eating out at authentic restaurants (H4). This corroborates past studies implying that sustainable behaviors commonly influence consumers’ choices in the hospitality sector [79,83]. The coherence and significance of this relationship mean that consumers with higher levels of self-reported sustainability are more likely to signal a higher level of support for authentic heritage restaurants. This behavior affirms the increasing customer shift that seems to embrace environmentally friendly practices, as emphasized by the research conducted on green consumerism and firms’ willingness to pay for green services [84].
Moreover, the analysis of mediation reinforces the content of hypotheses H5 and H6, where green consumerism is proven to act as a mediator between perceived authenticity and behavioral intentions as well as cultural experiences and behavioral intentions. These results support the framework by Stimulus-Organism-Response (SOR) that green consumerism is both cognitive and affective to facilitate sustainable dining behavior [39]. This therefore calls for the incorporation of the sustainability elements as part of a heritage restaurant’s strategic value proposition to affect the patrons’ behavioral intentions.
Consumer knowledge also enhanced the relationship between green consumerism and behavior intention (H7). This result supports previous research on the effect of knowledge gains on promoting and responding to green campaigns [10]. These results emphasize the need for educational and informative campaigns aimed at increasing consumers’ attention to sustainable activities in the sphere of hospitality and tourism services provision. It is possible that simple, informative, and entertaining information on the history of dishes and their preparation, as well as measures taken to make those meals more sustainable, would greatly improve consumer attitudes and behavioral patterns.

6.1. Theoretical Implications

This study is relevant to hospitality and sustainability literature by integrating perceived authenticity, green consumer behavior, and behavioral intention, essential in the context of heritage restaurants. It builds on the support for the Stimulus-Organism-Response (SOR) framework by showing that perception of authenticity as a stimulus leads to consumers’ cognitive/ affective state and consequent pro- sustainable dining behavior. Overall, the current study enriches the SOR framework by pointing toward green consumerism to be a relevant and significant mediating construct that can bridge between authenticity and sustainable behavioral intentions.
Furthermore, the results contribute to the expansion of the Cognitive Appraisal Theory (CAT) by describing the analysis of perceived authenticity in the gastronomy contexts based on the cognitive and affective means. As a result of highlighting the relationship between cultural tourism attachment and pro-sustainable behaviors, the study diversifies CAT’s applicability from general tourisms settings into cultural dining situations of heritage.
This study also establishes and tests the moderating effect of consumer knowledge, which remains a rather underexplored concept in the authenticity and green consumerism literature. The usefulness of these constructs for theoretical models focusing on sustainability behaviors is demonstrated to require incorporating the aspects of individual consumers including awareness and familiarity. This advances the existing knowledge on how differences in consumer knowledge affect behavior over knowledge gaps in hospitality and tourism literature.
By connecting cultural authenticity and green consumptions with sustainable purchasing motivations this study fills a gap in the literature on dynamics of cultural heritage dining. The insights above also advance theoretical developments in more sustainability-oriented hospitable study by demonstrating the co-constitutive relationships between culture and the environment. Finally, the study lays a groundwork for future theoretical research on how existing authenticity constructs can be measured and utilized for enhancing business benefits and accomplishing other global sustainability objectives in the gastronomy and tourism industries.

6.2. Practical Implications

The study provides valuable information for heritage restaurant operators and all the stakeholders in the hospitality and tourism sectors, with special emphasis on preserving the environment and adapting methods and means to attract and retain such customers. Authenticity defines one major area of suggested improvement for enhancing consumers’ experiences. Furthermore, the operators of heritage restaurants can enhance and enhance visitors’ dining experiences, thus enhancing the products that they sell more valuable. They can retain customers, explain and present time-honored techniques and contexts for preparing and consuming food and beverage. These elements are not only appreciated by consumers searching for meaning behind cultural identity or connections, but also become effective strategies for naming the above-mentioned outlets, particularly when competing with similar establishments.
Another important aspect of this study is the encouragement of green consumption. Some ways that restaurants can make sustainability a part of their business model include the procurement of local food supplies, practicing portion control and incorporating sustainable packaging materials into the business model. Information of these initiatives ensures that the customers acquire trust, thus creating a market of highly regarded green consumers. Specifically, source credibility related to the training provided by the interactive displays, digital menus or via staff narratives do endorse a great amount of informative content for consumers about the sustainable practices and therefore enhances consumers’ behavioral intention to eat in heritage restaurants.
Furthermore, the results indicate that incorporating the authentic sustainability model can help identify and promote heritage restaurants as distinctive and appealing niche products in the regional tourism environment. Executives in policy-making institutions, relevant ministries and state and regional tourism committees can include information about heritage restaurants in travel advertisements as an essential part of the food tourism offer. That is why, presenting cultural and environmental meaningful values, restaurants can expand their presence within global tourists and consumers.
Finally, the use of environmentally and organization sustainable and genuine strategies that promote customer patronage is beneficial. When arts venue organizations are able to adopt their appearances to the image of the current consumer–centric and sustainable restaurant experience, that forms a long-term customer relationship. Many such initiatives not only improve customer experience but also play their part in practicing more responsible types of tourism and preserving values of Culture. Culture and nature, tradition and the contemporary customer base, as well as the potential and corridors for continuing the preservation of the sustainable development paradigm in the fields of gastronomy and tourism can be attributed to the successes achieved by implementing heritage restaurants.

6.3. Limitation and Future Research

This study has the following limitations that need to be taken into account. The centrality of heritage restaurants in Hail, KSA constrains the generalization of the findings to other cultural, and regional contexts. Besides, since consumers completed the survey online and are requested to rate their perceptions, there could be socially desirable bias that influence consumer ratings on green consumerism and authenticity perceptions. Future studies might overcome these limitations by increasing the ethnic diversity of context set in which the research will take place and using panel designs to detect changes in consumers’ behavior with time. Thus, the extension of this line of research and preliminary exploration of other digital interventions, for instance, the impact of social networking sites as a tool for actualism and promotion of sustainable consumption, as well as experimental investigations of the relationships between authenticity, green consumerism, and behavioral intentions would immensely expand the understanding of the topic and contribute to the development of theory and practice.

References

  1. Xu, J.; Song, H.; Prayag, G. Using Authenticity Cues to Increase Repurchase Intention in Restaurants: Should the Focus Be on Ability or Morality? Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2023, 46, 101102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chen, X.; Lee, T.J.; Hyun, S.S. How Does a Global Coffeehouse Chain Operate Strategically in a Traditional Tea-Drinking Country? The Influence of Brand Authenticity and Self-Enhancement. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2022, 51, 176–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. O’Connor, K.; Carroll, G.R.; Kovács, B. Disambiguating Authenticity: Interpretations of Value and Appeal. PLoS One 2017, 12, e0179187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, Q.; Huang, R.; Hou, B. Perceived Authenticity of Traditional Branded Restaurants (China): Impacts on Perceived Quality, Perceived Value, and Behavioural Intentions. Curr. Issues Tour. 2020, 23, 2950–2971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kim, J.-H.; Song, H.; Youn, H. The Chain of Effects from Authenticity Cues to Purchase Intention: The Role of Emotions and Restaurant Image. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2020, 85, 102354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kim, J.-H.; Song, H. The Influence of Perceived Credibility on Purchase Intention via Competence and Authenticity. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2020, 90, 102617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Balogh, P.; Békési, D.; Gorton, M.; Popp, J.; Lengyel, P. Consumer Willingness to Pay for Traditional Food Products. Food Policy 2016, 61, 176–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, H.; Li, H.; DiPietro, R.B.; Levitt, J.A. The Role of Authenticity in Mainstream Ethnic Restaurants. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2018, 30, 1035–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Uggioni, P.L.; Proença, R.P. da C.; Zeni, L.A.Z.R. Assessment of Gastronomic Heritage Quality in Traditional Restaurants. Rev. De. Nutr. 2010, 23, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Naderi, I.; Paswan, A.K.; Guzman, F. Beyond the Shadow of a Doubt: The Effect of Consumer Knowledge on Restaurant Evaluation. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2018, 45, 221–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Song, H.; Phan, B. Van; Kim, J.-H. The Congruity between Social Factors and Theme of Ethnic Restaurant: Its Impact on Customer’s Perceived Authenticity and Behavioural Intentions. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2019, 40, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Le, T.H.; Arcodia, C.; Novais, M.A.; Kralj, A. What We Know and Do Not Know about Authenticity in Dining Experiences: A Systematic Literature Review. Tour. Manag. 2019, 74, 258–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hyun, J.; Lee, K. AUTHENTICITY IN ETHNIC RESTAURANTS: INVESTIGATING THE ROLES OF ETHNOCENTRISM AND XENOCENTRISM. Tour. Hosp. Manag. 2023, 28, 683–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, L.; Hanks, L. Online Reviews: The Effect of Cosmopolitanism, Incidental Similarity, and Dispersion on Consumer Attitudes toward Ethnic Restaurants. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2018, 68, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Song, H.; Kim, J.-H. Effects of History, Location and Size of Ethnic Enclaves and Ethnic Restaurants on Authentic Cultural Gastronomic Experiences. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2022, 34, 3332–3352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jang, S. (Shawn); Ha, J.; Park, K. Effects of Ethnic Authenticity: Investigating Korean Restaurant Customers in the U.S. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2012, 31, 990–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lu, A.C.C.; Gursoy, D.; Lu, C.Y. Authenticity Perceptions, Brand Equity and Brand Choice Intention: The Case of Ethnic Restaurants. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2015, 50, 36–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kim, S.-H.; Hong, J.-H. The Effects of Contexts on Consumer Emotions and Acceptance of a Domestic Food and an Unfamiliar Ethnic Food: A Cross-Cultural Comparison between Chinese and Korean Consumers. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2020, 29, 1705–1718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Moors, A. Theories of Emotion Causation: A Review. Cogn. Emot. 2009, 23, 625–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Roseman, I.J.; Spindel, M.S.; Jose, P.E. Appraisals of Emotion-Eliciting Events: Testing a Theory of Discrete Emotions. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1990, 59, 899–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lazarus, R.S. Emotion and Adaptation: Oxford University Press on Demand.[Google Scholar]. 1991.
  22. Hosany, S. Appraisal Determinants of Tourist Emotional Responses. J. Travel. Res. 2012, 51, 303–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kim, J.-H.; Li, J. (Justin) The Influence of Contemporary Negative Political Relations on Ethnic Dining Choices. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 2020, 44, 644–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Oh, M.; Kim, S. Role of Emotions in Fine Dining Restaurant Online Reviews: The Applications of Semantic Network Analysis and a Machine Learning Algorithm. Int. J. Hosp. Tour. Adm. 2022, 23, 875–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chi, C.G.-Q.; Ouyang, Z. (Chris); Lu, L.; Zou, R. Drinking “Green”: What Drives Organic Wine Consumption in an Emerging Wine Market. Cornell Hosp. Q. 2021, 62, 516–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Domínguez-Quintero, A.M.; González-Rodríguez, M.R.; Roldán, J.L. The Role of Authenticity, Experience Quality, Emotions, and Satisfaction in a Cultural Heritage Destination. J. Herit. Tour. 2019, 14, 491–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Fritz, K.; Schoenmueller, V.; Bruhn, M. Authenticity in Branding—Exploring Antecedents and Consequences of Brand Authenticity. Eur. J. Mark. 2017, 51, 324–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Choi, D.; Johnson, K.K.P. Influences of Environmental and Hedonic Motivations on Intention to Purchase Green Products: An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2019, 18, 145–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Emekci, S. Green Consumption Behaviours of Consumers within the Scope of TPB. J. Consum. Mark. 2019, 36, 410–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Song, Y.; Zhao, C.; Zhang, M. Does Haze Pollution Promote the Consumption of Energy-Saving Appliances in China? An Empirical Study Based on Norm Activation Model. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 145, 220–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dhir, A.; Talwar, S.; Sadiq, M.; Sakashita, M.; Kaur, P. Green Apparel Buying Behaviour: A Stimulus–Organism–Behaviour–Consequence (SOBC) Perspective on Sustainability-oriented Consumption in Japan. Bus. Strategy Env. 2021, 30, 3589–3605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Khan, M.S.; Saengon, P.; Alganad, A.M.N.; Chongcharoen, D.; Farrukh, M. Consumer Green Behaviour: An Approach towards Environmental Sustainability. Sustain. Dev. 2020, 28, 1168–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gilal, F.G.; Chandani, K.; Gilal, R.G.; Gilal, N.G.; Gilal, W.G.; Channa, N.A. Towards a New Model for Green Consumer Behaviour: A Self-determination Theory Perspective. Sustain. Dev. 2020, 28, 711–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Han, H. Theory of Green Purchase Behavior (TGPB): A New Theory for Sustainable Consumption of Green Hotel and Green Restaurant Products. Bus. Strategy Env. 2020, 29, 2815–2828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Fauzi, M.A.; Hanafiah, M.H.; Kunjuraman, V. Tourists’ Intention to Visit Green Hotels: Building on the Theory of Planned Behaviour and the Value-Belief-Norm Theory. J. Tour. Futures 2024, 10, 255–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Konuk, F.A.; Otterbring, T. The Dark Side of Going Green: Dark Triad Traits Predict Organic Consumption through Virtue Signaling, Status Signaling, and Praise from Others. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2024, 76, 103531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bulut, C.; Nazli, M.; Aydin, E.; Haque, A.U. The Effect of Environmental Concern on Conscious Green Consumption of Post-Millennials: The Moderating Role of Greenwashing Perceptions. Young Consum. 2021, 22, 306–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mehrabian, A. An Approach to Environmental Psychology. Mass. Inst. Technol. 1974. [Google Scholar]
  39. Jacoby, J. Stimulus-Organism-Response Reconsidered: An Evolutionary Step in Modeling (Consumer) Behavior. J. Consum. Psychol. 2002, 12, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Han, M.S.; Hampson, D.P.; Wang, Y.; Wang, H. Consumer Confidence and Green Purchase Intention: An Application of the Stimulus-Organism-Response Model. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2022, 68, 103061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chen, J.; Huang, Y.; Wu, E.Q.; Ip, R.; Wang, K. How Does Rural Tourism Experience Affect Green Consumption in Terms of Memorable Rural-Based Tourism Experiences, Connectedness to Nature and Environmental Awareness? J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2023, 54, 166–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tandon, A.; Sithipolvanichgul, J.; Asmi, F.; Anwar, M.A.; Dhir, A. Drivers of Green Apparel Consumption: Digging a Little Deeper into Green Apparel Buying Intentions. Bus. Strategy Env. 2023, 32, 3997–4012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, L.; Luo, B.; Sun, Y.; Zhu, F. The Influence Mechanism of Green Advertising on Consumers’ Intention to Purchase Energy-Saving Products: Based on the S-O-R Model. JUSTC 2023, 53, 0802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Badu-Baiden, F.; Kim, S. (Sam); Xiao, H.; Kim, J. Understanding Tourists’ Memorable Local Food Experiences and Their Consequences: The Moderating Role of Food Destination, Neophobia and Previous Tasting Experience. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2022, 34, 1515–1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Pérez Gálvez, J.C.; Torres-Matovelle, P.; Molina-Molina, G.; González Santa Cruz, F. Gastronomic Clusters in an Ecuadorian Tourist Destination: The Case of the Province of Manabí. Br. Food J. 2020, 122, 3917–3934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Cohen, E.; Avieli, N. Food in Tourism. Ann. Tour. Res. 2004, 31, 755–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wang, C.-Y.; Mattila, A.S. The Impact of Servicescape Cues on Consumer Prepurchase Authenticity Assessment and Patronage Intentions to Ethnic Restaurants. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 2015, 39, 346–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Song, H.; Phan, B. Van; Kim, J.-H. The Congruity between Social Factors and Theme of Ethnic Restaurant: Its Impact on Customer’s Perceived Authenticity and Behavioural Intentions. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2019, 40, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ellis, A.; Park, E.; Kim, S.; Yeoman, I. What Is Food Tourism? Tour. Manag. 2018, 68, 250–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mariani, M.M. Coordination in Inter-Network Co-Opetitition: Evidence from the Tourism Sector. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2016, 53, 103–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kim, J.-H.; Song, H.; Youn, H. The Chain of Effects from Authenticity Cues to Purchase Intention: The Role of Emotions and Restaurant Image. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2020, 85, 102354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Skinner, H.; Chatzopoulou, E.; Gorton, M. Perceptions of Localness and Authenticity Regarding Restaurant Choice in Tourism Settings. J. Travel. Tour. Mark. 2020, 37, 155–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Cappannelli, G.; Cappannelli, S.C. Authenticity: Simple Strategies for Greater Meaning and Purpose at Work and at Home; Emmis Books, 2004; ISBN 1578601487.
  54. Fine, G.A. Crafting Authenticity: The Validation of Identity in Self-Taught Art. Theory Soc. 2003, 32, 153–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Bruhn, M.; Schoenmüller, V.; Schäfer, D.; Heinrich, D. Brand Authenticity: Towards a Deeper Understanding of Its Conceptualization and Measurement. Adv. Consum. Res. 2012, 40. [Google Scholar]
  56. Alexander, N. Brand Authentication: Creating and Maintaining Brand Auras. Eur. J. Mark. 2009, 43, 551–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lu, A.C.C.; Gursoy, D.; Lu, C.Y. Authenticity Perceptions, Brand Equity and Brand Choice Intention: The Case of Ethnic Restaurants. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2015, 50, 36–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. MacCannell, D. Staged Authenticity: Arrangements of Social Space in Tourist Settings. Am. J. Sociol. 1973, 79, 589–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Cohen, E. Authenticity and Commoditization in Tourism. Ann. Tour. Res. 1988, 15, 371–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wang, N. Rethinking Authenticity in Tourism Experience. Ann. Tour. Res. 1999, 26, 349–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Jamal *, T.; Hill, S. Developing a Framework for Indicators of Authenticity: The Place and Space of Cultural and Heritage Tourism. Asia Pac. J. Tour. Res. 2004, 9, 353–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Grayson, K.; Martinec, R. Consumer Perceptions of Iconicity and Indexicality and Their Influence on Assessments of Authentic Market Offerings. J. Consum. Res. 2004, 31, 296–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Wang, C.-Y.; Mattila, A.S. The Impact of Servicescape Cues on Consumer Prepurchase Authenticity Assessment and Patronage Intentions to Ethnic Restaurants. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 2015, 39, 346–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Robinson, R.N.S.; Clifford, C. Authenticity and Festival Foodservice Experiences. Ann. Tour. Res. 2012, 39, 571–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Almansouri, M.; Verkerk, R.; Fogliano, V.; Luning, P.A. The Heritage Food Concept and Its Authenticity Risk Factors—Validation by Culinary Professionals. Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 2022, 28, 100523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kim, S.; Park, E.; Lamb, D. Extraordinary or Ordinary? Food Tourism Motivations of Japanese Domestic Noodle Tourists. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2019, 29, 176–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Jang, S. (Shawn); Ha, J. The Influence of Cultural Experience: Emotions in Relation to Authenticity at Ethnic Restaurants. J. Foodserv. Bus. Res. 2015, 18, 287–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Sthapit, E.; Björk, P.; Piramanayagam, S. Domestic Tourists and Local Food Consumption: Motivations, Positive Emotions and Savouring Processes. Ann. Leis. Res. 2023, 26, 316–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kolar, T.; Zabkar, V. A Consumer-Based Model of Authenticity: An Oxymoron or the Foundation of Cultural Heritage Marketing? Tour. Manag. 2010, 31, 652–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Stepchenkova, S.; Belyaeva, V. The Effect of Authenticity Orientation on Existential Authenticity and Postvisitation Intended Behavior. J. Travel. Res. 2021, 60, 401–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Le, T.H.; Arcodia, C.; Abreu Novais, M.; Kralj, A.; Phan, T.C. Exploring the Multi-Dimensionality of Authenticity in Dining Experiences Using Online Reviews. Tour. Manag. 2021, 85, 104292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Warburg, J.; Frommeyer, B.; Koch, J.; Gerdt, S.; Schewe, G. Voluntary Carbon Offsetting and Consumer Choices for Environmentally Critical Products—An Experimental Study. Bus. Strategy Env. 2021, 30, 3009–3024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Rizomyliotis, I.; Poulis, A.; Konstantoulaki, K.; Giovanis, A. Sustaining Brand Loyalty: The Moderating Role of Green Consumption Values. Bus. Strategy Env. 2021, 30, 3025–3039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Atzori, R.; Shapoval, V.; Murphy, K.S. Measuring Generation Y Consumers’ Perceptions of Green Practices at Starbucks: An IPA Analysis. J. Foodserv. Bus. Res. 2018, 21, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Perugini, M.; Bagozzi, R.P. The Role of Desires and Anticipated Emotions in Goal-directed Behaviours: Broadening and Deepening the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 2001, 40, 79–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Yadav, R.; Pathak, G.S. Determinants of Consumers’ Green Purchase Behavior in a Developing Nation: Applying and Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior. Ecol. Econ. 2017, 134, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Han, H. Consumer Behavior and Environmental Sustainability in Tourism and Hospitality: A Review of Theories, Concepts, and Latest Research. Sustain. Consum. Behav. Environ. 2021, 1–22. [Google Scholar]
  78. Jiang, Y.; Wen, J. Effects of COVID-19 on Hotel Marketing and Management: A Perspective Article. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2020, 32, 2563–2573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Han, H.; Moon, H.; Hyun, S.S. Uncovering the Determinants of Pro-Environmental Consumption for Green Hotels and Green Restaurants. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2019, 32, 1581–1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Nicolau, J.L.; Guix, M.; Hernandez-Maskivker, G.; Molenkamp, N. Millennials’ Willingness to Pay for Green Restaurants. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2020, 90, 102601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Han, H.; Moon, H.; Hyun, S.S. Uncovering the Determinants of Pro-Environmental Consumption for Green Hotels and Green Restaurants. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2019, 32, 1581–1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Liu, C.-R.; Chiu, T.-H.; Wang, Y.-C.; Huang, W.-S. Generation Y’s Revisit Intention and Price Premium for Lifestyle Hotels: Brand Love as the Mediator. Int. J. Hosp. Tour. Adm. 2020, 21, 242–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Shin, Y.H.; Im, J.; Jung, S.E.; Severt, K. Motivations behind Consumers’ Organic Menu Choices: The Role of Environmental Concern, Social Value, and Health Consciousness. J. Qual. Assur. Hosp. Tour. 2019, 20, 107–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Namkung, Y.; Jang, S. (Shawn) Are Consumers Willing to Pay More for Green Practices at Restaurants? J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 2017, 41, 329–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Dutta, K.; Umashankar, V.; Choi, G.; Parsa, H.G. A Comparative Study of Consumers’ Green Practice Orientation in India and the United States: A Study from the Restaurant Industry. J. Foodserv. Bus. Res. 2008, 11, 269–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Mergelsberg, E.L.P.; MacLeod, C.; Mullan, B.; Rudaizky, D.; Allom, V.; Houben, K.; Lipp, O.V. Food Healthiness versus Tastiness: Contrasting Their Impact on More and Less Successful Healthy Shoppers within a Virtual Food Shopping Task. Appetite 2019, 133, 405–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Bratanova, B.; Vauclair, C.-M.; Kervyn, N.; Schumann, S.; Wood, R.; Klein, O. Savouring Morality. Moral Satisfaction Renders Food of Ethical Origin Subjectively Tastier. Appetite 2015, 91, 137–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Kim, H.J.; Park, J.; Kim, M.-J.; Ryu, K. Does Perceived Restaurant Food Healthiness Matter? Its Influence on Value, Satisfaction and Revisit Intentions in Restaurant Operations in South Korea. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2013, 33, 397–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Han, H.; Moon, H.; Hyun, S.S. Uncovering the Determinants of Pro-Environmental Consumption for Green Hotels and Green Restaurants. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2019, 32, 1581–1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Assaker, G. The Effects of Hotel Green Business Practices on Consumers’ Loyalty Intentions: An Expanded Multidimensional Service Model in the Upscale Segment. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2020, 32, 3787–3807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Wang, S.; Berbekova, A.; Uysal, M.; Wang, J. Emotional Solidarity and Co-Creation of Experience as Determinants of Environmentally Responsible Behavior: A Stimulus-Organism-Response Theory Perspective. J. Travel. Res. 2024, 63, 115–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Haws, K.L.; Winterich, K.P.; Naylor, R.W. Seeing the World through GREEN-tinted Glasses: Green Consumption Values and Responses to Environmentally Friendly Products. J. Consum. Psychol. 2014, 24, 336–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Wang, C.-Y.; Mattila, A.S. The Impact of Servicescape Cues on Consumer Prepurchase Authenticity Assessment and Patronage Intentions to Ethnic Restaurants. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 2015, 39, 346–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Venkatesh, V.; Brown, S.A.; Bala, H. Bridging the Qualitative-Quantitative Divide: Guidelines for Conducting Mixed Methods Research in Information Systems. MIS Q. 2013, 21–54. [Google Scholar]
  95. Almansouri, M.; Verkerk, R.; Fogliano, V.; Luning, P.A. The Heritage Food Concept and Its Authenticity Risk Factors—Validation by Culinary Professionals. Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 2022, 28, 100523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Krippendorff, K. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology; Sage publications, 2018; ISBN 1506395678.
  97. Fathy, E.A.; Salem, I.E.; Zidan, H.A.K.Y.; Abdien, M.K. From Plate to Post: How Foodstagramming Enriches Tourist Satisfaction and Creates Memorable Experiences in Culinary Tourism. Curr. Issues Tour. 2024, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Elshaer, I.A.; Azazz, A.M.S.; Kooli, C.; Alqasa, K.M.A.; Afaneh, J.; Fathy, E.A.; Fouad, A.M.; Fayyad, S. Resilience for Sustainability: The Synergistic Role of Green Human Resources Management, Circular Economy, and Green Organizational Culture in the Hotel Industry. Adm. Sci. 2024, 14, 297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Marcoulides, G.A. Modern Methods for Business Research; Quantitative Methodology Series; Taylor & Francis, 1998; ISBN 9781135684129.
  100. Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences; Routledge, 2013; ISBN 9781134742707.
Figure 1. Hypothesized model.
Figure 1. Hypothesized model.
Preprints 151322 g001
Figure 2. Word frequency analysis.
Figure 2. Word frequency analysis.
Preprints 151322 g002
Figure 3. Hierarchical Clustering of Key Attributes Influencing Gastronomic and Cultural Experiences in Heritage Restaurants.
Figure 3. Hierarchical Clustering of Key Attributes Influencing Gastronomic and Cultural Experiences in Heritage Restaurants.
Preprints 151322 g003
Figure 4. Link analysis.
Figure 4. Link analysis.
Preprints 151322 g004
Figure 5. Results of the structural model.
Figure 5. Results of the structural model.
Preprints 151322 g005
Figure 6. Interaction-plot (Consumer knowledge moderation between green consumerism and behavioral intention).
Figure 6. Interaction-plot (Consumer knowledge moderation between green consumerism and behavioral intention).
Preprints 151322 g006
Table 1. Coding of reviews.
Table 1. Coding of reviews.
Category Codes
Environment Authenticity (EA) “Beautiful place”
“Traditional seating”
“Authentic decor and atmosphere”
Food Authenticity (FA) “Delicious food”
“Traditional dishes”
“Unique cooking style”
Historical and Cultural Value (HC) “Reflects the heritage”
“Cultural experience”
“Preserves history of the place”
Nostalgia (NOS) “Reminds me of my childhood”
“Just like old times”
“Brings back memories”
Brand Value (BV) “Reputation of the restaurant”
“Highly recommended by others”
“Popular in Hail”
Table 2. Testing of the measurement model.
Table 2. Testing of the measurement model.
Variables Items Loadings AVE Cronbach’s alpha Composite reliability VIF
Perceived Authenticity EA1 0.645 0.535 0.960 0.963 2.245
EA2 0.642 4.204
EA3 0.652 4.215
EA4 0.701 4.402
EA5 0.731 4.370
FA1 0.749 3.081
FA2 0.782 4.038
FA3 0.734 3.649
FA4 0.766 3.370
FA5 0.783 3.012
HC1 0.720 2.360
HC2 0.787 2.836
HC3 0.763 2.747
HC4 0.773 2.944
NOS1 0.776 3.714
NOS2 0.705 2.486
NOS3 0.750 3.220
NOS4 0.704 2.889
BV1 0.768 3.036
BV2 0.707 2.500
BV3 0.733 2.986
BV4 0.715 2.918
BV5 0.711 2.896
Green consumerism GCON1 0.814 0.679 0.882 0.913 2.236
GCON2 0.835 2.326
GCON3 0.830 2.378
GCON4 0.864 2.719
GCON5 0.774 1.872
Authentic cultural experience/ gastronomic experience GASE1 0.840 0.737 0.881 0.918 2.102
GASE2 0.850 2.266
GASE3 0.890 2.804
GASE4 0.853 2.330
Consumer knowledge KNOW1 0.760 0.585 0.771 0.849 1.385
KNOW2 0.846 1.626
KNOW3 0.741 1.611
KNOW4 0.704 1.622
Behavioral intention INT1 0.895 0.818 0.889 0.818 2.574
INT1 0.914 2.598
INT1 0.904 2.594
Table 3. Discriminant Validity.
Table 3. Discriminant Validity.
Authentic cultural experience/ gastronomic experience Behavioral intention Consumer knowledge Green consumerism Perceived Authenticity
Authentic cultural experience/ gastronomic experience 0.858
Behavioral intention 0.523 0.905
Consumer knowledge 0.179 0.274 0.765
Green consumerism 0.690 0.423 0.146 0.824
Perceived Authenticity 0.548 0.355 0.133 0.600 0.732
Notes: The diagonal components (bold) display the square roots of AVEs. Below the diagonal elements are the correlations between the constructions.
Table 4. Path Coefficient and Hypothesis Testing.
Table 4. Path Coefficient and Hypothesis Testing.
Structural Path Beta T Statistics P Values F2 Results 2.5 % 97.5 %
Direct Effect
Perceived Authenticity→ Authentic cultural experience/ gastronomic experience 0.548 8.034 0.000 0.429 H1, Support 0.409 0.671
Perceived Authenticity → Green consumerism 0.316 4.166 0.000 0.154 H2, Support 0.177 0.477
Authentic cultural experience/ gastronomic experience → Green consumerism 0.517 6.788 0.000 0.411 H3, Support 0.355 0.657
Green consumerism → Behavioral intention 0.333 4.632 0.000 0.127 H4, Support 0.190 0.458
Indirect Effect
Perceived Authenticity → Green consumerism → Behavioral intention 0.200 3.161 0.002 H5, Support 0.048 0.184
Authentic cultural experience/ gastronomic experience→ Green consumerism → Behavioral intention 0.172 2.974 0.003 H6, Support 0.073 0.303
Moderating Paths
Green consumerism × Consumer knowledge →
Behavioral intention
0.146 2.31 0.019 H7, Support 0.040 0.304
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated