Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

Scalar Field Source Teleparallel Robertson-Walker F(T)-Gravity Solutions

A peer-reviewed article of this preprint also exists.

Submitted:

22 December 2024

Posted:

23 December 2024

You are already at the latest version

Abstract
This paper investigates the Teleparallel Robertson-Walker (TRW) F(T) gravity solutions for a scalar field source. We use the TRW F(T) gravity field equations (FEs) for each k-parameter value case added by a scalar field to find new teleparallel F(T) solutions. For k=0, we find an easy-to-compute F(T) solution formula applicable for any scalar field source. Then we obtain for k=−1 and +1 situations some new analytical F(T) solutions only for specific values of n-parameter and well-determined scalar field cases. We can find by those computations a large number of analytical teleparallel F(T) solutions independent of any scalar potential V(ϕ) expression. The V(ϕ)-independence makes more easy the FEs solving and computations. The new solutions will usually be relevant for future cosmological applications on dark matter, dark energy (DE) quintessence, phantom energy and quintom models of physical processes.
Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

The teleparallel theories of gravity are an important and promising class of alternative theories where all quantities and symmetries are defined in terms of the coframe and the spin-connection [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. The most appropriate teleparallel geometry definition is as affine symmetry. A such frame-based symmetry on the frame bundle is defined by a coframe/spin-connection pair and a field X satisfying some fundamental Lie derivative relations [7,8,10,11]. These such relationship definitions are considered as the frame-dependent analogue of the symmetry definition as presented in refs. [3,4]. For a pure teleparallel geometry, a coframe/spin-connection pair will have in addition to satisfy the null Riemann curvature criteria relation R b μ ν a = 0 , which leads to the spin-connection solution ω b μ a = Λ c a μ Λ b c in terms of a typical Lorentz transformation Λ b a [11].
By using the Cartan-Karlhede (CK) algorithm, we can construct some invariant coframe/spin-connection pairs satisfying the affine frame symmetries. However, there are cosmological teleparallel spacetime geometries classes invariant under the full G 6 Lie algebra of affine symmetries [7,8,9]. In addition, the proper coframe and the pure symmetric field equations (FE) were ever obtained and described by a teleparallel Robertson-Walker (TRW) geometry, the Robertson-Walker (RW) metric g μ ν and a parameter k = ( 1 , 0 , 1 ) [7,8,9]. The parameter k is defined as the constant spatial curvature in the RW pseudo-Riemannian metric, but R b μ ν a = 0 in teleparallel spacetimes. The parameter k is usually considered as a 3-dimensional space curvature in the metric-based approach and a part of the torsion scalar in 4-dimensional teleparallel spacetimes. In TRW geometries, an appropriate coframe/spin-connection pair leads to the trivial antisymmetric FEs parts. There are some TRW geometries where the coframe/spin-connection pair admits the full G 6 Lie algebra defined by the 6 Killing Vectors (KVs). In the literature, there are papers for k = ± 1 cases some investigated geometries not yielding a G 6 Lie algebra. There are also some solutions involving the inappropriate coframes and/or spin-connections using. Recently, new coframe/spin-connection pairs satisfying a G 6 symmetry group have been constructed [3,4,19,20]. The most recent achievements on that leading to new teleparallel solutions were in refs [7,8,9,11].
A lot of works in the literature have been made on k = 0 TRW cosmological model cases (refs. [5,6] and references within). In particular, specific forms for F ( T ) have been investigated by using specific ansatz, and reconstruction methods have been explored extensively (where the function F ( T ) is reconstructed from assumptions on the models). Dynamical systems methods, especially fixed point and stability analysis, in flat TRW models have been used with the stability conditions study of the standard de Sitter fixed point [5,21,22,23,24,25]. Then k 0 solutions have been recently studied in bounce and inflation models [26,27] (i.e. the analysis is only applicable for k = 1 case). The perturbations have also been studied in non-flat cosmology [28]. In a recent paper, we found as exact k = 0 solutions of the FEs a combination of two power-law terms with the cosmological constant for a linear perfect fluid [8]. For k = ± 1 cases, the differential equation has been linearized and a rigorous stability test has been performed for determining specific conditions on possible non-flat cosmological solutions. This test has been made with the k = 0 exact solution (dominating term) and a linear correction term by using a power-law ansatz, perfect fluid Equation of State (EoS) and cosmological parameters for stable TRW solution and model requirements [8]. After the development of F ( T ) TRW geometries and solutions for linear perfect fluids, we can go further by using the same approach. There are new papers on cosmological teleparallel F ( T , B ) solutions for linear and non-linear perfect fluids and also for some scalar field sources [9]. We can also add recent papers on Kantowski-Sachs (KS) (pure time-dependent spacetimes) teleparallel F ( T ) solutions for perfect fluids and scalar fields [14,15,16]. Therefore, we have already suggested as a achievable research works in ref. [8] to study the scalar field TRW F ( T ) solutions and this deserves to be done as primary aim of the current paper. But there are also physical motivations for this new paper.
The most important physical motivations are concerning the possible teleparallel dark energy (DE) models. The first motivation is the quintessence DE physical process described by the linear perfect fluid EoS P ϕ = α Q ρ ϕ where 1 < α Q < 1 3 [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. This perfect fluid described DE model assumes a fundamental scalar field inducing and explaining this physical process and constitutes the first possible form of DE satisfying the P + ρ 0 energy condition [16]. There are also some teleparallel extension theories based on scalar field as a boundary variable or scalar-torsion theories to name only a few [39,40]. As a lower limit, there is the cosmological constant defined by a α Q = 1 perfect fluid as another form of DE and constitutes a some boundary of quintessence process in terms of EoS. The other main DE form is the phantom energy (or negative energy) where α Q < 1 and the energy condition will usually be violated ( P + ρ 0 ) [41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48]. A phantom energy-based cosmological model is described as an strong accelerated expanding universe leading after a finite-time to the Big Rip physical process (great breakdown) and constitutes a extreme cosmological scenario. It is often occurring where we assume a non-linear perfect fluid teleparallel cosmological model [14,16]. After type of DE determination and study, there are interests on the combination (or mix) of the quintessence and phantom DE models with the cosmological constant as an intermediate limit: the quintom physical process models [49,50,51,52,53,54]. This is often described by some two-scalar field models: one field for quintessence and the second for phantom, or one for unified process and a second for the coupling. There is even a study on quintom oscillating model between quintessence and phantom energy where the cosmological constant state is the mid-point oscillating amplitude position [51]. However, there is only one relevant paper concerning teleparallel quintom models [54]. All these DE physical process works are well justifying a study on possible scalar field TRW F ( T ) solution classes.
For this paper, we will first summarize in Section 2 the teleparallel F ( T ) gravity FEs, the TRW coframe/spin-connection pair used and the scalar field source parameter equations. In Section 3, we will solve the FEs for flat cosmological cases ( k = 0 ) and allowing some easy-to-compute F ( T ) solutions. We will enchain in Section 4 and Section 5 with k = 1 and + 1 solutions, but the FEs will only allow analytical F ( T ) solutions for some specific subcases. We will conclude this new development in Section 6 on possible impacts in favor of future DE models like quintessence, phantom and quintom physical processes.

2. Summary of Teleparallel Gravity and Field Equations

2.1. Teleparallel F ( T ) -Gravity Theory

The teleparallel F ( T ) -type gravity action integral with any gravitational source is [1,5,12,13,14,15,18]:
S F ( T ) = d 4 x h 2 κ F ( T ) + L S o u r c e ,
where h is the coframe determinant, κ is the coupling constant and L S o u r c e is the gravitational source term. We will apply the least-action principle on the eqn (1) to find the symmetric and antisymmetric parts of FEs as [12,13,14,15]:
κ Θ a b = F T T G a b + F T T T S a b μ μ T + g a b 2 F T T F T T ,
0 = F T T T S a b μ μ T ,
with G a b the Einstein tensor, Θ a b the energy-momentum, T the torsion scalar, g a b the gauge metric, S a b μ the superpotential (torsion dependent) and κ the coupling constant. The canonical energy-momentum and its GR conservation law are obtained from L M a t t e r term of eqn (1) as [5,18]:
Θ a μ = 1 h δ L S o u r c e δ h μ a ,
ν Θ μ ν = 0 ,
where ν the covariant derivative and Θ μ ν the conserved energy-momentum tensor. The eqn (3a) antisymmetric and symmetric parts are [12]:
Θ [ a b ] = 0 , Θ ( a b ) = T a b ,
where T a b is the symmetric part of Θ μ ν . The eqn (3b) also imposes the symmetry of Θ μ ν and then eqns (4) condition. Eqn (4) is valid only when the matter field interacts with the metric g μ ν defined from the coframe h μ a and the gauge g a b , and is not directly coupled to the F ( T ) gravity. This consideration is only valid for the null hypermomentum case (i.e. T μ ν = 0 ) as discussed in refs. [13,14,15,55]. This last condition on hypermomentum is defined from eqns (2a) and (2b) as [55]:
T a b = κ Θ a b F T T G a b F T T T S a b μ μ T g a b 2 F T T F T T = 0 .
There are more general teleparallel T μ ν definition and T μ ν 0 conservation law, but this is not really concerning the teleparallel F ( T ) -gravity situation [55,56,57,58].

2.2. Teleparallel Robertson-Walker Spacetime Geometry

In teleparallel gravity, any frame-based geometry on a frame bundle defined by a coframe/spin-connection pair and a field X must satisfy the fundamental Lie Derivative-based equations [7,8,10,11]:
L X h a = λ a b h b a n d L X ω b c a = 0 ,
where ω b c a is the spin-connection in terms of the differential coframe h a and λ a b is the linear isotropy group component. For TRW spacetime geometries on an orthonormal frame, the coframe h μ a solution will be [7,8] :
h μ a = D i a g 1 , a ( t ) 1 k r 2 1 / 2 , a ( t ) r , a ( t ) r sin θ .
The solution for spin-connection components will also be [7,8] :
ω 122 = ω 133 = ω 144 = W 1 ( t ) , ω 234 = ω 243 = ω 342 = W 2 ( t ) , ω 233 = ω 244 = 1 k r 2 a ( t ) r , ω 344 = cos ( θ ) a ( t ) r sin ( θ ) ,
where W 1 and W 2 are depending on k-parameter and defined by:
  • k = 0 : W 1 = W 2 = 0 ,
  • k = + 1 : W 1 = 0 and W 2 ( t ) = ± k a ( t ) ,
  • k = 1 : W 1 ( t ) = ± k a ( t ) and W 2 = 0 .
For any W 1 and W 2 , we will obtain the same symmetric FEs set to solve for each subcases depending on k-parameter. These previous coframe and spin-connection expressions were found by solving the eqns (6) and imposing the null Riemann curvature condition (i.e., R b μ ν a = 0 as stated in ref. [11]). These solutions were also used in F ( T ) TRW spacetime recent works [7,8]. The FEs to be solved in the current paper are defined for each k-parameter cases and will lead to different new teleparallel F ( T ) solution classes. These FEs are also purely symmetric and valid on proper frames as clearly showed in refs. [7,8].

2.3. Scalar Field Source Conservation Laws Solutions

The scalar field source Lagrangian density L S o u r c e term is defined as [5,8,9,16,40]:
L S o u r c e = h 2 ν ϕ ν ϕ h V ϕ .
The eqn (9) for a cosmological-like spacetime and a time-dependent ϕ = ϕ ( t ) scalar field source is [9,16]:
L S o u r c e = h ϕ ˙ 2 2 h V ϕ .
where ϕ ˙ = t ϕ . By applying the least-action principle to eqn (10), the energy-momentum tensor T a b is [13,14,15,21,59]:
T a b = P ϕ + ρ ϕ u a u b + g a b P ϕ ,
where u a = ( 1 , 0 , 0 , 0 ) , the pressure P ϕ and density ρ ϕ are [8,16]:
P ϕ = ϕ ˙ 2 2 V ϕ and ρ ϕ = ϕ ˙ 2 2 + V ϕ ,
with ϕ ˙ = ϕ t and V = V ϕ . The TRW spacetimes scalar field conservation law is [8,9]:
3 H ϕ ˙ + ϕ ¨ + d V d ϕ = 0 ,
The eqn (13) is valid for any ϕ ( t ) scalar field expression. For coming steps, we will solve the FEs by solving and satisfying the eqn (13).
To complete the discussion on physical implications, from eqns (12) and making the parallel between scalar field ϕ and the DE linear perfect fluids EoS equivalent P ϕ = α Q ρ ϕ , we need to define the quintessence coefficient index (or DE index) α Q as [16,29,30,31,36]:
α Q = P ϕ ρ ϕ = ϕ ˙ 2 2 V ϕ ϕ ˙ 2 + 2 V ϕ ,
where the usual types of DE are defined:
  • Quintessence  1 < α Q < 1 3 : It describes a controlled accelerating universe expansion where energy conditions are always satisfied, i.e. P ϕ + ρ ϕ > 0 [29,30,31,36].
  • Phantom energy  α Q < 1 : It usually describes an uncontrolled accelerating universe expansion going to the Big Rip event [42,43,44]. The energy condition is violated, i.e. P ϕ + ρ ϕ 0 .
  • Cosmological constant  α Q = 1 : This is an intermediate limit between the two previous and main types of DE where P ϕ + ρ ϕ = 0 . A constant scalar field source ϕ = ϕ 0 will directly lead to this case according to eqn (14).
  • Quintom models: Mixture of previous DE types usually described by some double scalar-field models [49,50,51,52,53].
By using eqn (14), we can find the perfect fluid equivalent for any new teleparallel F ( T ) solutions, potential V ϕ and ansatz. The eqn (14) is useful for making new teleparallel F ( T ) solutions classification in terms of DE quintessence, phantom and quintom processes in cosmological model studies within the teleparallel framework.

3. k = 0 Cosmological Solutions

The FEs and torsion scalar expressions for ρ = ρ ϕ and P = P ϕ defined by eqns (12) are [8]:
κ ϕ ˙ 2 2 + V ϕ = F ( T ) 2 + 6 H 2 F T ,
κ ( ϕ ˙ 2 V ϕ ) = F ( T ) 2 3 H ˙ + 2 H 2 F T 3 H F ˙ T ,
T = 6 H 2 ,
where H = a ˙ a is the Hubble parameter. By merging eqns (15a) and (15b) and then using eqn (15c), we find as unified FE:
6 κ ϕ ˙ 2 2 = t T F T .
For any ϕ = ϕ ( t ( T ) ) scalar field definition and any potential V ( ϕ ) expression, we will use the a ( t ) = a 0 t n and eqn (15c) to find that t ( T ) = 6 n T . For any scalar field ϕ = ϕ ( t ( T ) ) and potential V ( ϕ ) expressions, the general F ( T ) solution formula will be:
F ( T ) = Λ 0 + B T 6 κ 2 d T T 1 / 2 t ( T ) d t ϕ ˙ 2 ( t ) .
The first two terms of eqn (17) are identical to those from the linear perfect fluid k = 0 TRW F ( T ) solution found in ref [8]. The last term of eqn (17) is clearly the scalar field source contribution.
We can compute the F ( T ) solutions by using eqn (17) and the a ( t ) = a 0 t n ansatz yielding to t ( T ) = 6 n T for the scalar field cases:
  • Power-law general: For ϕ ( t ) = p 0 t p and p 1 2 , we find:
    F ( T ) = Λ 0 + B T + 6 κ p 0 2 p 2 ( 6 n 2 ) p 1 2 2 ( 2 p 1 ) ( p 1 ) T 1 p .
  • Power-law special: For ϕ ( t ) = p 0 t 1 2 , we find:
    F ( T ) = Λ 0 + B T + 6 κ p 0 2 8 T ln ( T ) .
  • Logarithmic: For a field defined as ϕ ( t ) = p 0 ln t , we find:
    F ( T ) = Λ 0 + B T + κ p 0 2 2 n T .
  • Exponential: For ϕ ( t ) = p 0 exp p t , we find:
    F ( T ) = Λ 0 + B T 6 κ 2 p 0 2 p 2 6 n p E i 1 2 p 6 n T + T exp 2 p 6 n T ,
    where E i 1 ( x ) is an exponential integral function.
There are several other possible ϕ ( t ) source terms which may lead to new teleparallel F ( T ) solutions using eqn (17) general formula.

4. k = 1 Cosmological Solutions

The FEs and torsion scalar for ρ = ρ ϕ and P = P ϕ defined by eqns (12) are [8]:
κ ϕ ˙ 2 2 + V ϕ = F ( T ) 2 + 6 H H + δ k a F T ,
κ ( ϕ ˙ 2 V ϕ ) = F ( T ) 2 3 H ˙ + 2 H 2 + 2 H δ k a k a 2 F T 3 H + δ k a F ˙ T ,
T = 6 H + δ k a 2 .
By merging eqns (22a) and (22b), the unified FE will be expressed as:
κ ϕ ˙ 2 2 = H ˙ k a 2 F T + H + δ k a F ˙ T .
The general F ( T ) solution from eqn (23) to be computed will be expressed as:
F ( T ) = Λ 0 + d T [ ( C 1 κ 2 t ( T ) d t exp t d t a 2 H ˙ k a a H + δ k × a ϕ ˙ 2 ( t ) a H + δ k ) exp t ( T ) d t a 2 H ˙ k a a H + δ k ] .
By applying a power-law ansatz a ( t ) = a 0 t n to eqn (24), the F ( T ) solution will simplify as:
F ( T ) = Λ 0 + d T [ C 1 κ t ( T ) d t ϕ ˙ 2 ( t ) exp δ k a 0 ( n 1 ) t 1 n × exp δ k a 0 ( n 1 ) t 1 n ( T ) 2 n t 1 ( T ) + 2 δ k a 0 t n ( T ) ] .
From eqn (22c), the characteristic equation leading to t ( T ) expressions is:
0 = δ 1 T 6 n t 1 δ k a 0 t n .
There are specific values of n leading to eqn (26)-based analytical teleparallel F ( T ) solutions:
  • n = 1 2 : Eqn (26) becomes:
    0 = t 1 + 2 δ k a 0 t 1 2 δ 1 2 T 3 , t 1 2 ( T ) = δ k a 0 + δ 2 k a 0 2 + δ 1 2 T 3 ,
    where δ 2 = ± 1 . Then eqn (25) for F ( T ) solution is:
    F ( T ) = Λ 0 + d T [ C 1 κ δ 1 3 2 t ( T ) d t ϕ ˙ 2 ( t ) exp 2 δ k a 0 t 1 2 × T 1 / 2 exp 2 1 δ 2 1 a 0 2 δ 1 k 2 T 3 1 ] .
    Eqn (28) by setting δ k a 0 = 1 and a power-law scalar field ϕ ( t ) = p 0 t p yields to new analytical F ( T ) solutions for the subcases:
    (a)
    p = 3 4 :
    F ( T ) = Λ 0 + C 1 exp 2 1 δ 2 1 + δ 1 2 T 3 1 1 δ 2 1 + δ 1 2 T 3 2 κ δ 1 p 0 2 9 8 3 2 T 1 / 2 .
    (b)
    p = 1 :
    F ( T ) = Λ 0 + C 1 exp 2 1 δ 2 1 + δ 1 2 T 3 1 1 δ 2 1 + δ 1 2 T 3 2 + κ p 0 2 × ( δ 1 3 2 T 1 / 2 2 δ 2 9 + 3 δ 1 6 T + 3 ln 1 + δ 2 1 + δ 1 2 T 3 1 δ 2 1 + δ 1 2 T 3 3 2 ln 2 T ) .
    There are several other possible F ( T ) solutions by setting other values of δ k a 0 , p and/or other scalar field ϕ ( t ) expressions inside eqn (28) general expression. However, we can expect that such cases will yield to more bigger expression of F ( T ) .
  • n = 1 : Eqn (26) becomes:
    0 = δ 1 T 6 1 + δ k a 0 t 1 , t ( T ) = δ 1 1 + δ k a 0 6 T ,
    Eqn (25) for F ( T ) solution becomes:
    F ( T ) = Λ 0 + B T δ k 2 a 0 + 1 2 δ 1 6 κ 2 δ 1 6 1 + δ k a 0 δ k a 0 d T T δ k 2 a 0 1 2 t ( T ) d t ϕ ˙ 2 ( t ) t δ k a 0 .
    Eqn (32) yields to a new analytical F ( T ) solutions for the cases:
    (a)
    General Power-law  ϕ ( t ) = p 0 t p :
    F ( T ) = Λ 0 + B T δ k 2 a 0 + 1 2 + δ 1 6 κ p 0 2 p 2 δ 1 1 + δ k a 0 6 2 p 1 2 2 p 1 + δ k a 0 ( p 1 ) T 1 p .
    (b)
    Special Power-law  ϕ ( t ) = p 0 t 1 2 δ k 2 a 0 :
    F ( T ) = Λ 0 + B T δ k 2 a 0 + 1 2 + κ p 0 2 1 δ k a 0 2 T δ k 2 a 0 + 1 2 ln T 8 δ 1 6 δ k a 0 1 1 + δ k a 0 δ k a 0 + 1 .
    (c)
    Logarithmic  ϕ ( t ) = p 0 ln pt :
    F ( T ) = Λ 0 + B T δ k 2 a 0 + 1 2 + κ p 0 2 2 1 + k a 0 2 T .
    (d)
    Exponential  ϕ ( t ) = p 0 exp pt :
    F ( T ) = Λ 0 + B T δ k 2 a 0 + 1 2 δ 1 6 κ p 0 2 p 2 2 δ 1 6 1 + δ k a 0 δ k a 0 × d T T δ k 2 a 0 1 2 t ( T ) d t exp 2 p t t δ k a 0 .
    There is no general solution for eqn (36). However, there are specific solutions:
    • δ k a 0 = 1 :
      F ( T ) = Λ 0 + B T κ p 0 2 16 96 E i 1 4 p δ 1 6 T p 2 e 4 p δ 1 6 T T 4 T p δ 1 6 .
    • δ k a 0 = 2 :
      F ( T ) = Λ 0 + B T 3 2 δ 1 κ p 0 2 18 p [ 108 δ 1 p 3 E i 1 6 p δ 1 6 T + e 6 p δ 1 6 T T 3 2 6 36 + 3 6 p 2 T δ 1 p T ] .
    There are several possible new F ( T ) solutions for other values of δ k a 0 and using eqn (36).
    There are additional possible new F ( T ) solutions from eqn (32) integral with other types of scalar field sources.
  • n = 2 : Eqn (26) becomes:
    0 = t 2 + 2 δ a 0 k t 1 δ 1 δ a 0 T 6 k , t 1 ( T ) = δ a 0 k + δ 2 δ 1 δ a 0 T 6 k a 0 2 k ,
    where δ 2 = ± 1 . Eqn (25) becomes:
    F ( T ) = Λ 0 + d T [ C 1 δ 1 κ 6 2 t ( T ) d t ϕ ˙ 2 ( t ) exp δ k a 0 t 1 × exp 1 + δ 2 1 + δ 1 δ a 0 k 6 T T ] .
    Eqn (40) by using a power-law scalar field ϕ ( t ) = p 0 t p and setting δ k a 0 = 1 yields to a new analytical F ( T ) solutions for some p < 0 subcases:
    (a)
    p = 1 2 :
    F ( T ) = Λ 0 + C 1 1 + δ 2 1 + δ 1 T 6 exp 1 + δ 2 1 + δ 1 T 6 δ 2 κ p 0 2 1 + δ 1 T 6 3 / 2 .
    (b)
    p = 1 :
    F ( T ) = Λ 0 + C 1 1 + δ 2 1 + δ 1 T 6 exp 1 + δ 2 1 + δ 1 T 6 κ p 0 2 2 6 δ 1 T 1 / 2 + T 2 .
    There are several other possible F ( T ) solutions by setting other values of δ k a 0 , p and/or other scalar field ϕ ( t ) expressions. However, we can expect that such cases will yield to more bigger expression of F ( T ) .
  • n 1 : Eqn (26) becomes:
    0 = δ 1 T 6 n t 1 , t ( T ) = n δ 1 6 T .
    Eqn (25) becomes for n :
    F ( T ) Λ 0 + B T κ δ 1 6 2 d T T 1 / 2 t ( T ) d t ϕ ˙ 2 ( t ) ,
    where exp δ k a 0 n t n 1 under the very large n limit. Eqn (44) yields to new analytical F ( T ) solutions for the cases:
    (a)
    General Power-law  ϕ ( t ) = p 0 t p :
    F ( T ) Λ 0 + B T κ n δ 1 6 2 p p 0 2 p 2 2 n ( 2 p 1 ) ( 1 p ) T 1 p .
    (b)
    Special Power-law  ϕ ( t ) = p 0 t 1 / 2 :
    F ( T ) Λ 0 + B T + κ δ 1 6 p 0 2 4 T ln T .
    (c)
    Logarithmic  ϕ ( t ) = p 0 ln pt :
    F ( T ) Λ 0 + B T + κ p 0 2 2 n T .
    (d)
    Exponential  ϕ ( t ) = p 0 exp pt :
    F ( T ) Λ 0 + B T κ δ 1 6 p 0 2 p 2 2 6 n p δ 1 E i 1 2 p n δ 1 6 T + e 2 p n δ 1 6 T T .
    There are several possible new F ( T ) solutions from eqn (44) integral with other types of scalar field sources. Therefore eqns (45)–(48) for large n yield to very similar solutions to eqns (18)–(21) ( k = 0  case solutions).

5. k = + 1 Cosmological Solutions

The FEs and torsion scalar for ρ = ρ ϕ and P = P ϕ defined by eqns (12) are [8]:
κ ϕ ˙ 2 2 + V ϕ = F ( T ) 2 + 6 H 2 F T ,
κ ( ϕ ˙ 2 V ϕ ) = F ( T ) 2 3 H ˙ + 2 H 2 k a 2 F T 3 H F ˙ T ,
T = 6 H 2 k a 2 .
By merging eqns (49a) and (49b), the unified FE will be expressed as:
κ ϕ ˙ 2 2 = H ˙ k a 2 F T + H F ˙ T ,
The general F ( T ) solution from eqn (50) to be computed will be expressed as:
F ( T ) = Λ 0 + d T H ( t ( T ) ) C 1 κ 2 t ( T ) d t exp k t d t H a 2 ϕ ˙ 2 ( t ) exp k t ( T ) d t H a 2 .
Eqn (51) becomes by applying the power-law ansatz a ( t ) = a 0 t n to eqn (51):
F ( T ) = Λ 0 + 1 n d T t ( T ) C 1 κ 2 t ( T ) d t ϕ ˙ 2 ( t ) exp k t 2 ( 1 n ) 2 n ( 1 n ) a 0 2 × exp k t 2 ( 1 n ) ( T ) 2 n ( 1 n ) a 0 2 .
From eqn (49c), the characteristic equation leading to t ( T ) expressions is:
0 = T 6 n 2 t 2 + k a 0 2 t 2 n .
There are specific values of n leading to eqn (53)-based analytical teleparallel F ( T ) solutions:
  • n = 1 2 : Eqn (53) becomes:
    0 = t 2 4 k a 0 2 t 1 2 T 3 , t 1 ( T ) = 2 k a 0 2 + 2 δ 2 k 2 a 0 4 + T 6 , .
    where δ 2 = ± 1 . Eqn (52) becomes:
    F ( T ) = Λ 0 + d T C 1 κ a 0 2 2 k t ( T ) d t ϕ ˙ 2 ( t ) exp 2 k t a 0 2 exp 4 1 + δ 2 1 + a 0 4 6 k 2 T 1 1 + δ 2 1 + a 0 4 6 k 2 T .
    Eqn (55) by setting k a 0 2 = 1 yields to new analytical F ( T ) solutions for the scalar field:
    (a)
    Linear Power-law  ϕ ( t ) = p 0 t :
    F ( T ) = Λ 0 + C 1 [ 1 + δ 2 1 + T 6 exp 4 1 + δ 2 1 + T 6 1 + E i 1 4 1 + δ 2 1 + T 6 1 ] + 3 κ p 2 p 0 2 2 2 δ 2 1 + T 6 ln T + ln δ 2 1 + T 6 1 δ 2 1 + T 6 + 1 .
    (b)
    Quadratic Power-law  ϕ ( t ) = p 0 t 2 :
    F ( T ) = Λ 0 + C 1 [ 1 + δ 2 1 + T 6 exp 4 1 + δ 2 1 + T 6 1 + 3 E i 1 4 1 + δ 2 1 + T 6 1 ] + 9 κ p 2 p 0 2 4 T 12 T 1 + 4 1 3 T δ 2 1 + T 6 3 / 2 .
    (c)
    Exponential  ϕ ( t ) = p 0 exp pt :
    F ( T ) = Λ 0 + C 1 [ 1 + δ 2 1 + T 6 exp 4 1 + δ 2 1 + T 6 1 + 3 E i 1 4 1 + δ 2 1 + T 6 1 ] 3 κ p 2 p 0 2 ( p 1 ) [ 1 + δ 2 1 + T 6 exp 4 p 1 + δ 2 1 + T 6 1 + ( 4 p 1 ) E i 1 4 p 1 + δ 2 1 + T 6 1 ] .
    There are several other possible F ( T ) solutions by setting other values of k a 0 , p and/or other scalar field ϕ ( t ) expressions. However, we can expect that such cases will yield to more bigger expression of F ( T ) .
  • n = 1 : Eqn (53) becomes:
    0 = T 6 1 k a 0 2 t 2 , t 2 ( T ) = 6 1 k a 0 2 T .
    Eqn (52) becomes:
    F ( T ) = Λ 0 + B T 1 2 k 2 a 0 2 + κ 2 6 1 k a 0 2 k 2 a 0 2 + 1 2 × d T t ( T ) d t ϕ ˙ 2 ( t ) t k a 0 2 T 1 2 k 2 a 0 2 .
    Eqn (60) yields to a new analytical F ( T ) solutions for the cases:
    (a)
    General Power-law  ϕ ( t ) = p 0 t p :
    F ( T ) = Λ 0 + B T 1 2 k 2 a 0 2 + κ p 0 2 p 2 2 2 p 1 k a 0 2 ( 1 p ) 6 1 k a 0 2 p T 1 p .
    (b)
    Special Power-law  ϕ ( t ) = p 0 t 1 2 + k 2 a 0 2 :
    F ( T ) = Λ 0 + B T 1 2 k 2 a 0 2 + κ p 0 2 8 1 + k a 0 2 2 1 k a 0 2 2 6 1 k a 0 2 k 2 a 0 2 + 1 2 2 1 k a 0 2 ln T T 1 2 k 2 a 0 2 .
    (c)
    Logarithmic  ϕ ( t ) = p 0 ln pt :
    F ( T ) = Λ 0 + B T 1 2 k 2 a 0 2 κ p 0 2 2 1 + k a 0 2 T .
    (d)
    Exponential  ϕ ( t ) = p 0 exp pt :
    F ( T ) = Λ 0 + B T 1 2 k 2 a 0 2 + κ p 0 2 p 2 2 6 1 k a 0 2 k 2 a 0 2 + 1 2 × d T t ( T ) d t exp 2 p t t k a 0 2 T 1 2 k 2 a 0 2 .
    There is no general solution, but for specific values of k a 0 2 > 0 :
    • k a 0 2 1 :
      F ( T ) Λ 0 3 κ p 0 2 p 2 γ + 3 2 ln ( 24 ) ϵ ln ( T ) ,
      where F ( T ) Λ 0 under ϵ 0 limit.
    • k a 0 2 = 2 :
      F ( T ) = Λ 0 + B T 1 2 6 κ p 0 2 p 2 [ 2 6 p ( T ) 1 / 2 E i 1 2 p 6 ( T ) 1 / 2 Ei 1 2 p 6 ( T ) 1 / 2 + e 2 p 6 ( T ) 1 / 2 1 ] .
    There are several possible new F ( T ) solutions from eqn (60) integral with other scalar field sources.
  • n = 2 : Eqn (53) becomes:
    0 = a 0 2 T 6 k 4 a 0 2 k t 2 + t 4 , t 2 ( T ) = 2 a 0 2 k 1 + δ 2 1 k 24 a 0 2 T ,
    where δ 2 = ± 1 . Eqn (52) becomes:
    F ( T ) = Λ 0 + d T C 1 κ 4 t ( T ) d t ϕ ˙ 2 ( t ) exp k t 2 4 a 0 2 2 a 0 2 k 1 + δ 2 1 k 24 a 0 2 T 1 / 2 × exp 1 2 1 + δ 2 1 k 24 a 0 2 T .
    Eqn (68) for the power-law scalar field ϕ ( t ) = p 0 t p and k a 0 2 = 1 yields to new analytical F ( T ) solutions in subcases:
    • p = 1 2 :
      F ( T ) = Λ 0 + 1 + δ 2 1 T 24 × C 1 exp 1 2 1 + δ 2 1 T 24 + 4 κ p 0 2 2 δ 2 1 T 24 2 .
    • p = 3 2 :
      F ( T ) = Λ 0 + 1 + δ 2 1 T 24 [ C 1 exp 1 2 1 + δ 2 1 T 24 + 144 κ p 0 2 p 2 2 × δ 2 1 T 24 2 + 1 10 1 + δ 2 1 T 24 3 δ 2 1 T 24 2 ] .
    There are several other possible F ( T ) solutions by setting other values of k a 0 , p and/or other scalar field expressions. However, we can expect that such cases will yield to more bigger expression of F ( T ) .
  • n 1 : Eqn (53) becomes for large n:
    0 = T 6 n 2 t 2 , t ( T ) = δ 2 6 n T ,
    where δ 2 = ± 1 . Eqn (52) becomes for n :
    F ( T ) Λ 0 + B T κ δ 2 6 2 d T T 1 / 2 t ( T ) d t ϕ ˙ 2 ( t ) ,
    where exp k t 2 n 2 n 2 a 0 2 1 under the very large n limit. Eqn (68) yields to a new analytical F ( T ) solutions for the cases:
    (a)
    General Power-law  ϕ ( t ) = p 0 t p :
    F ( T ) Λ 0 + B T + κ δ 2 6 p 0 2 p 2 δ 2 6 n 2 p 1 2 ( 2 p 1 ) ( p 1 ) T 1 p .
    (b)
    Special Power-law  ϕ ( t ) = p 0 t 1 / 2 :
    F ( T ) Λ 0 + B T + κ δ 2 6 p 0 2 8 T ln T .
    (c)
    Logarithmic  ϕ ( t ) = p 0 ln pt :
    F ( T ) Λ 0 + B T + κ p 0 2 2 n T .
    (d)
    Exponential  ϕ ( t ) = p 0 exp pt :
    F ( T ) Λ 0 + B T κ p 0 2 p δ 2 6 2 2 6 n p δ 2 E i 1 2 p n δ 6 T + e 2 p n δ 6 T T .
    There are several possible new F ( T ) solutions from eqn (72) integral with other types of scalar field sources. Therefore eqns (73)–(76) for large n yield to almost identical solutions comparing to eqns (18)–(21) ( k = 0 case solutions) and eqns (45)–(48) ( k = 1 case solutions). We can conclude that the k = ± 1 teleparallel F ( T ) solutions for n will lead to flat cosmological ( k = 0 ) solutions as a general limit.
All the previous teleparallel F ( T ) solutions found in Section 3 to Section 5 are new and go further than some recent research papers in the literature. Therefore there are several other possible subcases which might be leading to additional new F ( T ) solutions and possibly going to the same direction.

6. Concluding Remarks

The present works first allowed to solve the TRW F ( T ) FEs obtained in refs [7,8], this for a scalar field source ϕ expressed in terms of density ρ ϕ and pressure P ϕ . For flat cosmological spacetimes ( k = 0 case), we obtain by using the general eqn (17) with different scalar fields ϕ ( t ) purely analytical and simple teleparallel F ( T ) solutions as expressed by eqns (18)–(21). This was all possible by using the power ansatz for the scale factor a ( t ) and then the relation t ( T ) obtained with eqn () to express everything in terms of scalar torsion T. One could still use eqn (17) to obtain other F ( T ) solutions from other scalar fields ϕ ( t ) . This type of result is a logical continuation of the literature, because there are many k = 0 solutions for other types of sources not only in teleparallel F ( T ) gravity, but also in its extensions. The most important thing here is obtaining the all-purpose eqn (17) to generate all the teleparallel F ( T ) solutions needed to study and compare the different k = 0 cosmological solutions. This flexibility will allow the study of cosmological phenomena with DE for any values of n and potential V ( ϕ ) involved in the models. These are good advantages favoring our new F ( T ) solutions.
We have also found general and multipurpose formulas for non-flat cosmological spacetimes ( k = 1 and + 1 cases) from the k = ± 1 TRW F ( T ) FEs and the power ansatz for a ( t ) , namely eqns (24) and (51) respectively. However, the characteristic eqns (26) and (53) from the scalar torsion eqns (22c) and (49c) ultimately allow only a limited number of purely analytic teleparallel F ( T ) solutions defined for very specific values of n. Simple analytical solutions are obtained for n = 1 and in the limit of very large n, which allows in the latter case to treat models involving the very rapid acceleration of the expansion of the universe. This type of situation will be very useful for the study of phantom energy models and more precisely the physical mechanisms leading to the Big Rip. The large n limit solutions for any k = 0 and ± 1 cases will lead to the same types of F ( T ) solutions by comparing eqns (18)–(21), (45)–(48) and (73)–(76) for each scalar field source subcases. For lower values of n, the latter will be especially useful for the study of the DE quintessence for non-flat cosmological systems. Note that the cases of early ( n = 1 2 ) and late ( n = 2 ) expansion lead to very different teleparallel F ( T ) solutions: this represents an important benefit for studies on the different forms of DE quintessence. However, the expressions for F ( T ) often involve various special functions, a sign that these are mathematically more sophisticated cases. The solutions n = 1 here constitute an intermediate case between the early and late expansions of universe expansion also involving the DE quintessence process to thus better bridge the gap between the solutions n = 1 2 and 2. In principle, other values of n could have been used, but this would only have complicated the present approach without necessarily providing better results and conclusions.
The results of present work with those obtained in ref. [8] for linear perfect fluids will together allow to fully develop the TRW F ( T ) -type cosmological models involving the different forms of DE. There have been attempts at a similar development to this one in recent papers. These studies often focused on teleparallel extensions [9,23,24,25,26,27]. There have been very recent similar studies involving KS type spacetimes having however fewer symmetries and possible simplifications at the origin (4 KVs instead of 6) [14,15,16]. The present paper on TRW F ( T ) solutions complements the various studies providing the essential ingredients of the perfect fluids and scalar field F ( T ) solutions classes. We must keep in mind that the ultimate aims are the complete studies of teleparallel cosmological models involving the various DE forms. These are therefore the next steps in the development of Teleparallel Gravity and we must now go all the way.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

All data is included inside the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AL Alexandre Landry    KS Kantowski-Sachs
CK Cartan-Karlhede    KV Killing Vector
DE Dark Energy    NGR New General Relativity
EoS Equation of State    RW Robertson-Walker
Eqn Equation    TEGR Teleparallel Equivalent of General Relativity
FE Field Equation    TRW Teleparallel Robertson-Walker
GR General Relativity    

References

  1. Krššák, M.; van den Hoogen, R. J.; Pereira, J. G.; Boehmer, C. G.; Coley, A. A. Teleparallel Theories of Gravity: Illuminating a Fully Invariant Approach. Classical and Quantum Gravity 2019, 36, 183001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Krššák, M.; Saridakis, E. N. The covariant formulation of f(T) gravity. Classical and Quantum Gravity 2016, 33, 115009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hohmann, M.; Järv, L.; Krššák, M.; Pfeifer, C. Modified teleparallel theories of gravity in symmetric spacetimes. Physical Review D 2019, 100, 084002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hohmann, M.; Järv, L.; Krššák, M.; Pfeifer, C. Teleparallel theories of gravity as analogue of non-linear electrodynamics. Physical Review D 2018, 97, 104042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bahamonde, S. , Dialektopoulos, K. F., Escamilla-Rivera, C., Farrugia, G., Gakis, V., Hendry, M., Hohmann, M., Said, J.L., Mifsud, J. & Di Valentino, E., Teleparallel Gravity: From Theory to Cosmology, Report of Progress in Physics 2023, 86, 026901. [Google Scholar]
  6. Cai, Y.-F.; Capozziello, S.; De Laurentis, M.; Saridakis, E.N. f(T) teleparallel gravity and cosmology. Report of Progress in Physics 2016, 79, 106901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Coley, A.A.; van den Hoogen, R.J.; McNutt, D.D. Symmetric Teleparallel Geometries. \Classical and Quantum Gravity 2022, 39, 22LT01. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Coley, A.A.; Landry, A.; Gholami, F. Teleparallel Robertson-Walker Geometries and Applications. Universe 2023, 9, 454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gholami, F.; Landry, A. Cosmological solutions in teleparallel F(T,B) gravity. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2411.18455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. McNutt, D.D.; Coley, A.A.; van den Hoogen, R.J. A frame based approach to computing symmetries with non-trivial isotropy groups. Journal of Mathematical Physics 2023, 64, 032503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Coley, A. A.; van den Hoogen, R. J.; McNutt, D.D. Symmetry and Equivalence in Teleparallel Gravity. Journal of Mathematical Physics 2020, 61, 072503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Coley, A.A.; Landry, A.; van den Hoogen, R.J.; McNutt, D.D. Spherically symmetric teleparallel geometries. The European Physical Journal C 2024, 84, 334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Landry, A. Static spherically symmetric perfect fluid solutions in teleparallel F(T) gravity. Axioms 2024, 13, 333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Landry, A. Kantowski-Sachs spherically symmetric solutions in teleparallel F(T) gravity. Symmetry 2024, 16, 953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. van den Hoogen, R.J.; Forance, H. Teleparallel Geometry with Spherical Symmetry: The diagonal and proper frames. Journal of Cosmology and Astrophysics 2024, 11, 033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Landry, A. , Scalar field Kantowski-Sachs spacetime solutions in teleparallel F(T) gravity, in final preparation.
  17. Coley, A.A.; Landry, A.; van den Hoogen, R.J.; McNutt, D.D. Generalized Teleparallel de Sitter geometries. The European Physical Journal C 2023, 83, 977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Aldrovandi, R.; Pereira, J.G. Teleparallel Gravity, An Introduction; Springer, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  19. M. Hohmann, L. Järv and U. Ualikhanova, Covariant formulation of scalar-torsion gravity. Physical Review D 2018, 97, 104011. [CrossRef]
  20. Hohmann, M. Spacetime and observer space symmetries in the language of Cartan geometry. Journal of Mathematical Physics 2016, 57, 082502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Coley, A.A. Dynamical systems and cosmology; Kluwer Academic: Dordrecht, 2003; ISBN 1-4020-1403-1. [Google Scholar]
  22. Bahamonde, S.; Bohmer, C.G.; Carloni, S.; Copeland, E.J.; Fang, W.; Tamanini, N. Dynamical systems applied to cosmology: dark energy and modified gravity. Physical Report 2018, 775-777, 1–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kofinas, G.; Leon, G.; Saridakis, E.N. Dynamical behavior in f(T,TG) cosmology. Classical and Quantum Gravity 2014, 31, 175011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bohmer, C.G.; Jensko, E. Modified gravity: a unified approach to metric-affine models. Journal of Mathematical Physics 2023, 64, 082505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Aldrovandi, R.; Cuzinatto, R.R.; Medeiros, L.G. Analytic solutions for the Λ-FRW Model. Foundations of Physics 2006, 36, 1736–1752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Casalino, A.; Sanna, B.; Sebastiani, L.; Zerbini, S. Bounce Models within Teleparallel modified gravity. Physical Review D 2021, 103, 023514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Capozziello, S.; Luongo, O.; Pincak, R.; Ravanpak, A. Cosmic acceleration in non-flat f(T) cosmology. General Relativity and Gravitation 2018, 50, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bahamonde, S.; Dialektopoulos, K.F.; Hohmann, M.; Said, J.L.; Pfeifer, C.; Saridakis, E.N. Perturbations in Non-Flat Cosmology for f(T) gravity. European Physical Journal C 2023, 83, 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zlatev, I.; Wang, L.; Steinhardt, P. Quintessence, Cosmic Coincidence, and the Cosmological Constant. Physical Review Letters, 1999, 82, 896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Steinhardt, P.; Wang, L.; Zlatev, I. Cosmological tracking solutions. Physical Review D 1999, 59, 123504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Caldwell, R.R.; Dave, R.; Steinhardt, P. Cosmological Imprint of an Energy Component with General Equation of State. Physical Review Letters 1998, 80, 1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Carroll, S.M. Quintessence and the Rest of the World. Physical Review Letters 1998, 81, 3067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Doran, M.; Lilley, M.; Schwindt, J.; Wetterich, C. Quintessence and the Separation of CMB Peaks. Astrophysical Journal, 2001, 559, 501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zeng, X.-X.; Chen, D.-Y.; Li, L.-F. Holographic thermalization and gravitational collapse in the spacetime dominated by quintessence dark energy. Physical Review D, 2015, 91, 046005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chakraborty, S.; Mishra, S.; Chakraborty, S. Dynamical system analysis of quintessence dark energy model. International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics 2025, 22, 2450250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Shlivko, D.; Steinhardt, P.J. Assessing observational constraints on dark energy. Physics Letters B 2024, 855, 138826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wetterich, C. Cosmology and the Fate of Dilatation Symmetry. Nuclear Physics B 1988, 302, 668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chiba, T.; Okabe, T.; Yamaguchi, M. Kinetically Driven Quintessence. Physical Review D 2000, 62, 023511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Trivedi, O., Khlopov. Cosmological singularities in f(T,ϕ) gravity. European Physical Journal C 2023, 83, 1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hohmann, M. Scalar-torsion theories of gravity III: analogue of scalar-tensor gravity and conformal invariants. Physical Review D 2018, 98, 064004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Carroll, S.M.; Hoffman, M.; Trodden, M. Can the dark energy equation-of-state parameter w be less than -1? Physical Review D, 2003, 68, 023509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Caldwell, R.R. A phantom menace? Cosmological consequences of a dark energy component with super-negative equation of state, Physics Letters B, 2002, 545, 23. [Google Scholar]
  43. Farnes, J.S. A Unifying Theory of Dark Energy and Dark Matter: Negative Masses and Matter Creation within a Modified ΛCDM Framework. Astronomy & Astrophysics 2018, 620, A92. [Google Scholar]
  44. Baum, L.; Frampton, P.H. Turnaround in Cyclic Cosmology. Physical Review Letters, 2007, 98, 071301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Hu, W. Crossing the Phantom Divide: Dark Energy Internal Degrees of Freedom. Physical Review D 2005, 71, 047301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Karimzadeh, S.; Shojaee, R. Phantom-Like Behavior in Modified Teleparallel Gravity. Advances in High Energy Physics 2019, 4026856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Pati, L.; Kadam, S.A.; Tripathy, S.K.; Mishra, B. Rip cosmological models in extended symmetric teleparallel gravity. Physics of the Dark Universe, 2022, 35, 100925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kucukakca, Y.; Akbarieh, A.R.; Ashrafi, S. Exact solutions in teleparallel dark energy model. Chinese Journal of Physics, 2023, 82, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Cai, Y.-F.; Saridakis, E.N.; Setare, M.R.; Xia, J.-Q. Quintom Cosmology: Theoretical implications and observations. Physics Report 2010, 493, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Guo, Z.-K.; Piao, Y.-S.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Y.-Z. Cosmological evolution of a quintom model of dark energy. Physics Letters B 2005, 608, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Feng, B.; Li, M.; Piao, Y.-S.; Zhang, X. Oscillating quintom and the recurrent universe. Physics Letters B 2006, 634, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Mishra, S.; Chakraborty, S. Dynamical system analysis of quintom dark energy model. European Physical Journal C 2018, 78, 917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Tot, J.; Coley, A.A.; Yildrim, B.; Leon, G. The dynamics of scalar-field Quintom cosmological models. Physics of the Dark Universe, 2023, 39, 101155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bahamonde, S.; Marciu, M.; Rudra, P. Generalised teleparallel quintom dark energy non-minimally coupled with the scalar torsion and a boundary term. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2018, 04, 056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Golovnev, A.; Guzman, M.-J. Bianchi identities in f(T)-gravity: Paving the way to confrontation with astrophysics. Physics Letter B 2020, 810, 135806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Iosifidis, D. Cosmological Hyperfluids, Torsion and Non-metricity. European Physical Journal C 2020, 80, 1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Heisenberg, L.; Hohmann, M.; Kuhn, S. Homogeneous and isotropic cosmology in general teleparallel gravity. European Physical Journal C 2023, 83, 315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Heisenberg, L.; Hohmann, M. Gauge-invariant cosmological perturbations in general teleparallel gravity. European Physical Journal C 2024, 84, 462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hawking, S.W.; Ellis, G.F.R. The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time; Cambridge University Press, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  60. Bohmer, C.G.; d’Alfonso del Sordo, A. Cosmological fluids with boundary term couplings. General Relativity and Gravitation 2024, 56, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2026 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated