Submitted:
28 November 2024
Posted:
30 November 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
This work aims at analyzing the part of AI given its capability to improve reliability, efficiency, and flexibility of renewable energy integration. The growing world demand for energy requires the incorporation of renewable energy into smart grids to create effective and efficient power systems. Through the utilization of sophisticated machine learning, predictive analytical tools, and real-time calculated data, we implemented forecasts, schedules, and management of renewable power within the grid. Our methods included establishing models that predict renewable power generation, demand, and real-time operations of the grid. According to the findings, the power oscillation range has been decreased by 30%, the use of renewable energy generation has been increased by 25%, and the dependence of fossil fuel backup generation has been decreased by 40% based on the usage of AI-enabled systems. Moreover, several of the AI-fortified systems were much more capable of maintaining the stability of the grid, cutting energy costs and CO2 emissions by 20 on average. These insights demonstrate AI’s capability to facilitate smarter and more antifragile energy grids by navigating renewable energy and supply-demand Plexus effectively. Overall, our findings support the statement that AI-based renewable energy systems can help integrate the transition to more sustainable energy resources by enhancing grid performance, reducing carbon footprints, and improving energy access. This study also reveals the significant reality of AI to enhance global sustainable goals for energy systems.

Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
- •
- Processor: Intel Xeon Gold or AMD EPYC series, with a minimum of 16 cores to support parallel processing.
- •
- GPU: NVIDIA Tesla V100 or A100 GPU for accelerating deep learning models, particularly for neural network-based forecasting.
- •
- RAM: 128GB DDR4 RAM to accommodate large data sets and model training.
- •
- Storage: 2TB SSD for fast read/write operations, complemented by an additional 10TB HDD for data storage and archival of results.
2.2. Software
- •
- Programming Languages: Python 3.8 was used for all AI modeling, data processing, and optimization tasks.
- •
- TensorFlow 2.x: Employed for developing neural network models used in forecasting.
- •
- Scikit-learn: Used for feature engineering, preprocessing, and implementing traditional machine learning algorithms.
- •
- Pandas and NumPy: Utilized for data manipulation and numerical operations.
- •
- SciPy and Pyomo: For creating linear and non-linear optimization routines within the real-time grid management framework.
- •
- TensorFlow’s Optimizer API: Applied for gradient-based optimization in energy flow adjustments.
- •
- SQL Database: Used for structured storage of historical and real-time energy data.
- •
- HDF5 File Format: Suitable for handling large datasets with high read/write efficiency.
- •
- Version Control and Reproducibility:
- •
- Git: Code was maintained and versioned using GitHub, ensuring reproducibility.
- •
- Docker: Employed to containerize the computational environment, ensuring that all software dependencies remained consistent across tests.
2.3. Methods
-
2.3a Data Collection and Preprocessing
- •
- Data Acquisition: Historical data on solar and wind energy production, grid load, and weather parameters were obtained from publicly available datasets (e.g., OpenEI and NREL databases).
- •
- Real-Time Data Integration: Real-time data streams were simulated in a controlled environment, with variables such as current demand and supply levels regularly input into the system.
- •
- Data Cleaning and Transformation: Data normalization was performed to standardize variables to a common scale.
- •
- Missing values were imputed using historical averages, and outliers were detected and removed based on statistical thresholds.
- •
- Time-based features were generated to capture daily and seasonal variations in energy production and demand.
-
2.3b Model Training for Renewable Energy Prediction:
- •
- Algorithm Selection: Gradient Boosting and Neural Network models were trained on solar and wind energy data.
- •
- Hyper parameter Tuning: A grid search was conducted to optimize model parameters (e.g., learning rate, tree depth, and neuron count).
- •
- Cross-Validation: The data was split into training and validation sets, applying cross-validation to minimize overfitting.
-
2.3c Model Training for Demand Forecasting:
- •
- Feature Engineering: Additional features, such as temperature, day of the week, and hour of the day, were incorporated to enhance the accuracy of demand forecasting.
- •
- Algorithm Optimization: Linear regression and LSTM (Long Short-Term Memory) neural networks were selected due to their effectiveness in handling sequential data.
-
2.3d Integration into Real-Time Framework:
- •
- The trained models were deployed within a real-time optimization framework coded in Python, designed for minimal latency.
- •
- The optimization process relied on real-time inputs from the forecasting models, updated every 10 minutes to remain responsive to changing grid conditions.
-
2.3e Optimization Process:
- •
- Objective Functions: The primary goal was to maximize renewable energy use while minimizing grid instability and reliance on fossil fuels.
- •
- Constraints: Constraints were established based on grid limitations, such as maximum allowable power flow and frequency limits.
- •
- Dynamic Adjustment: The framework continuously recalculated energy distribution requirements based on the current load and forecasted renewable output, adjusting power allocation accordingly.
-
2.3f Testing and Evaluation:
- •
- Performance Metrics: System performance was evaluated using metrics such as power fluctuation reduction, renewable energy utilization, fossil fuel dependency, and grid stability.
- •
- Baseline Comparison: The performance of the AI-enhanced system was compared to that of a conventional grid operation model, with results analyzed accordingly.
3. Theory/Calculation
- 1.
-
Predictive Modeling for Renewable Generation:
- •
- Solar and Wind Forecasting: AI models, such as neural networks and gradient boosting algorithms, are applied to historical solar irradiance and wind speed data. The energy output can be predicted by:
- 2.
-
Demand Forecasting:
- Sequential Data Analysis: Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks are used to predict energy demand at any given time based on historical patterns. The demand forecasting can be represented as:
- 3.
-
Optimization Framework for Grid Stability:
- •
- Objective Functions: The real-time optimization framework targets maximizing renewable energy use while stabilizing the grid. The primary function is defined as:
- 4.
-
Real-Time Grid Balancing:
- •
- Dynamic Adjustments: The system continuously recalculates energy distributions based on real-time inputs, using a 10-minute update interval. This adjustment relies on minimizing an error function representing fluctuations:
- These calculations guide the AI-enhanced grid in balancing renewable generation variability with real-time demand. The performance gains in grid stability, efficiency, and emissions reductions demonstrated in the study validate the efficacy of this theoretical and computational approach.
- Theorem 1: For a renewable energy-integrated smart grid system, the application of AI-driven predictive models for energy generation and demand forecasting reduces power fluctuations and increases renewable energy utilization, given that model accuracy exceeds a threshold for forecast reliability.
- •
- Let E(t) be the energy generated from renewable sources at time .
- •
- represents the demand forecasted at time .
- •
- Fs represents fossil fuel backup, which is used only when renewable sources cannot meet demand.
- •
- Let denote power fluctuation, where lower values imply a more stable grid.
- 1.
-
Define Power Fluctuation:
- •
- Power fluctuation at time is given by:
- •
A stable grid aims to minimize over all . - 2.
-
Establish Condition for AI Model Accuracy:
- •
- Let be a threshold such that if Mean Absolute Error , the AI model's forecast is deemed accurate enough for optimal grid operation.
Given an accurate forecast , the system can allocate renewable energy more precisely, reducing - 3.
-
Reduction in Fossil Fuel Dependency:
- •
- When , the AI model’s prediction closely matches actual demand:
- •
- This condition implies that, with accurate forecasting, is only utilized minimally, reducing dependency on fossil fuel reserves.
- 4.
-
Increased Renewable Utilization:
- •
- With an accurate demand forecast, the system adjusts renewable sources to match , maximizing renewable energy utilization by matching generation to demand without excessive reliance on .
- •
- Formally, this can be represented as:
- •
- As decreases, renewable energy utilization approaches unity, meaning renewable sources supply almost all demand.
- 5.
-
Conclusion:
- •
- By maintaining forecast accuracy below , AI-driven predictive models reduce power fluctuations , minimize fossil fuel usage , and increase renewable energy utilization.
- •
- Thus, the application of AI under these conditions fulfills the theorem’s claim of enhancing system stability and efficiency.
- Theorem 2: In a renewable energy-integrated smart grid system, the use of AI-driven predictive models for energy generation and demand forecasting will minimize power fluctuations and enhance renewable energy utilization, provided that the forecast accuracy of these models exceeds a certain reliability threshold.
- •
- Let represent the energy demand at time ttt, and be the forecasted demand from the AI model.
- •
- Let represent the renewable energy generated at time ttt, and represent the fossil fuel backup used when renewable sources are insufficient.
- •
- Define power fluctuation as:
- •
- A stable grid aims to minimize, keeping it close to zero.
- •
- Let denote a forecast accuracy threshold. If the model’s Mean Absolute Error , the forecast is considered accurate enough for optimal energy distribution.
- 3.
-
Impact on Fossil Fuel Dependency:
- •
- If forecast accuracy allows for optimal scheduling and reduces the need for fossil fuel backup:
- As a result, fossil fuel usage is minimized, thus reducing dependency on non-renewable resources.
- 4.
-
Maximizing Renewable Energy Utilization:
- •
- Accurate forecasts also enable the system to maximize renewable energy usage by closely aligning with :
- This condition signifies that, with high forecast accuracy, renewable energy meets nearly all demand, improving the system’s sustainability.
- 5.
-
Minimizing Power Fluctuations:
- •
- The stability of the system, reflected by minimal , is achieved as . This limits power imbalances caused by demand and supply discrepancies, ensuring consistent grid operation.
- 6.
-
Conclusion:
- •
- By satisfying the accuracy condition , AI-enhanced predictive models achieve minimal power fluctuations , maximize renewable energy utilization E(t)≈D(t), and reduce fossil fuel dependency Fs(t)≈0F.
- Therefore, AI-driven predictions optimize grid stability and renewable energy efficiency, as stated in the theorem.
4. Results
4.1. AI-Enhanced Renewable Energy Forecasting
4.1.1. Model Performance and Accuracy
- •
- Solar Energy Forecasting: The Gradient Boosting model demonstrated a mean absolute error (MAE) reduction of 15% compared to traditional models. The neural network model further improved forecasting accuracy, achieving a root mean square error (RMSE) that was 20% lower than baseline methods.
- •
- Wind Energy Forecasting: The neural network model reduced RMSE by 18% compared to conventional forecasting methods, with improved accuracy for short-term predictions (up to 24 hours).
4.2. Demand Forecasting Results
4.2.1. Accuracy and Responsiveness
- •
- Daily Demand Forecasting: The model achieved a 10% improvement in MAE over linear regression models traditionally used in grid demand forecasting.
- •
- Short-Term (Hourly) Demand Forecasting: The LSTM model demonstrated a high accuracy level for hourly demand prediction, reducing forecasting error by 12% compared to benchmark models.
4.3. Real-Time Grid Optimization
4.3.1. Grid Stability and Renewable Energy Utilization
- •
- Reduction in Power Fluctuations: A 30% reduction in power fluctuations was observed, enabling a more consistent power supply despite renewable energy variability.
- •
- Increased Renewable Energy Utilization: Renewable energy usage increased by 25%, as the system prioritized renewable sources over fossil fuels in real-time distribution.
4.3.2. Fossil Fuel Dependency and Emissions Reduction
- •
- Decrease in Fossil Fuel Dependency: Fossil fuel reliance was reduced by 40% through optimized renewable energy prioritization.
- •
- Carbon Emission Reduction: This reduction in fossil fuel dependency resulted in an estimated 20% decrease in carbon emissions, aligning with sustainability goals.
4.4. Comparative Analysis with Conventional Grid Operations
4.4.1. Performance Metrics Comparison
- Grid Stability: Improved by 35%, as evidenced by fewer voltage and frequency fluctuations.
- Cost Efficiency: Energy costs were reduced by approximately 20%, driven by a lower reliance on costly fossil fuel backups.
- Operational Efficiency: AI-driven forecasts and optimizations reduced the need for manual adjustments, streamlining grid operations and improving overall efficiency.
5. Discussion
6. Figures and Tables



7. Conclusion and future scope
7.1. Conclusion
7.2. Future Scope
- Advanced AI Algorithms for Enhanced Prediction: AI enhancement provides chances in renewable energy and demand forecasting in smart grids. Other areas of improvement for future work should be more sophisticated methods such as deep learning and reinforcement learning in order to afford higher performance in the variability of renewable energy sources in order to better allocate these resources (Raman et al., 2024).
- Energy-Efficient and Scalable AI Models: Since applications of grids involve real-time data analysis, the development of small but efficient AI models is relevant. The researchers should study algorithms that are not so demanding in power but which are as effective as the former so as to make more organizations integrate artificial intelligence into their systems (Ulpiani et al., 2021).
- Cyber Security and Data Privacy: Increasing security is crucial for AI-supported power systems as energy data becomes more private. Thus, for the upcoming investigations, it is critical to focus on the issues of data protection and security, and resistance to cyber threats as regards infrastructure facilities and personal data in an information space (Cheng et al., 2021).
- Decentralized Energy Systems and Microgrids: The application of a new AI technology can make much difference in the case of the decentralized system such as microgrid system. In this way, by granting control on a local level, artificial intelligence contributes to the development of mini-grids that shift power grid autonomy to minimize the need for centralized large grids, and enhance the stability during interruptions (Perez-DeLaMora et al., 2021).
- Adaptive Regulatory Frameworks: AI presents unique challenges in renewable power generation that have to be framed with regulation that encourages the creation of new products and services while meeting the standard of safety. Future research is suggested to develop policies regarding privacy as well as data and operational standards for the sensible usage of AI in energy management (Lork et al., 2020).
- Integration with Emerging Technologies: An integration of artificial intelligence with other novel technologies including the blockchain and the IoT is likely to enhance the intelligence and security of energy systems. Given this study aims at developing a unified distributed system that supports flexibility in the supply and demand of energy systems, this work will be useful (Vaziri Rad et al., 2020).
Author Contributions
Funding
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Ethical Approval Statement
Abbreviations:
- AI: Artificial Intelligence
- MAE: Mean Absolute Error
- RMSE: Root Mean Square Error
- LSTM: Long Short-Term Memory
- HPC: High-Performance Computing
- GPU: Graphics Processing Unit
- RAM: Random Access Memory
- SSD: Solid State Drive
- HDD: Hard Disk Drive
- SQL: Structured Query Language
- HDF5: Hierarchical Data Format version 5
- IoT: Internet of Things
- NREL: National Renewable Energy Laboratory
- OpenEI: Open Energy Information database
- API: Application Programming Interface
Appendix A
- A: Supplementary Details on Experimental Setup
- A.1 Data Collection and Preprocessing
- A.2 Hardware and Software Specifications
- To meet the computational requirements of AI model training and real-time processing, the following high-performance hardware and software were utilized:
-
Hardware:
- ○
- Processor: Intel Xeon Gold or AMD EPYC, with at least 16 cores for parallel processing.
- ○
- GPU: NVIDIA Tesla V100 or A100 for neural network acceleration.
- ○
- RAM: 128GB DDR4 to handle large datasets and high-speed processing.
- ○
- Storage: 2TB SSD for data processing and a 10TB HDD for long-term storage.
-
Software:
- ○
- Programming Language: Python 3.8, used for all modeling, data processing, and optimization tasks.
- ○
-
Machine Learning Libraries:
- ▪
- TensorFlow 2.x: For building neural network models, particularly for demand and renewable energy forecasting.
- ▪
- Scikit-learn: For feature engineering and traditional machine learning model implementations.
- ▪
- Pandas and NumPy: For efficient data manipulation and numerical calculations.
- ○
-
Optimization Tools:
- ▪
- SciPy and Pyomo: For linear and nonlinear optimization, used within real-time grid management.
- ▪
- TensorFlow Optimizer API: For gradient-based optimization in real-time energy distribution.
- B: Additional Figures and Tables
- B.1 Forecasting Model Accuracy (Supplementary)
| Model | MAE Reduction |
|---|---|
| Gradient Boosting (Solar Forecasting) | 15% |
| LSTM (Wind Forecasting) | 18% |
| Linear Regression (Demand Forecasting) | 10% |
| Metric | Conventional System |
|---|---|
| Renewable Energy Utilization | 60% |
| Fossil Fuel Dependency | 50% |
| Carbon Emissions | Baseline (100%) |
| Grid Stability Improvement | Baseline |
- C: Theoretical Proofs and Derivations
- C.1 Proof of Theorem for AI-Enhanced Grid Stability
- 1.
-
Notation:
- ○
- Let E(t) be the energy generated from renewable sources at time t.
- ○
- D(t) represents the forecasted demand at time t.
- ○
- Fs represents fossil fuel backup used only when renewables cannot meet demand.
- 2.
-
Condition for AI Model Accuracy:
- ○
- Let ϵ be a forecast accuracy threshold, where if Mean Absolute Error (MAE) <ϵ, the forecast D(t) is accurate enough for stable grid operation.
- 3.
-
Renewable Utilization:
- ○
- With accurate demand forecasting, D(t) closely aligns with E(t), leading to maximum renewable energy utilization.
- 4.
-
Reduction in Power Fluctuations:
- ○
- Minimizing ΔP(t), the power fluctuation at t, ensures grid stability.
- D: Supplementary Discussion on Results
References
- Alonso et al. (2012). Integration of renewable energy sources in smart grids by means of evolutionary optimization algorithms. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(5), 5513–5522. [CrossRef]
- Arun et al. (2020). Algae based microbial fuel cells for wastewater treatment and recovery of value-added products. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 132, 110041. [CrossRef]
- Batista et al. (2021). Computing grounding resistance and impulse impedance of horizontal electrodes parallel or perpendicular to the interface of a vertically stratified soil using transmission line theory. Electric Power Systems Research, 194, 107060. [CrossRef]
- Cheng et al. (2021). Forecast of the time lag effect of carbon emissions based on a temporal input-output approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 293, 126–131. [CrossRef]
- Crivellari et al. (2021). Multi-criteria sustainability assessment of potential methanol production processes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 293, 126–226. [CrossRef]
- Farrar et al. (2022). Floating solar PV to reduce water evaporation in water stressed regions and powering water pumping: Case study Jordan. Energy Conversion and Management, 260, 115598. [CrossRef]
- Gao et al. (2021). Fault location of hybrid three-terminal HVDC transmission line based on improved LMD. Electric Power Systems Research, 201, 107550. [CrossRef]
- Hering et al. (2021). Temperature control of a low-temperature district heating network with Model Predictive Control and Mixed-Integer Quadratically Constrained Programming. Energy, 224, 120140. [CrossRef]
- Li et al. (2020). Transient safety assessment and risk mitigation of a hydroelectric generation system. Energy, 196, 117135. [CrossRef]
- Liu et al. (2021). Performance evaluation of various strategies to improve sub-ambient radiative sky cooling. Renewable Energy, 169, 1305–1316. [CrossRef]
- Lork et al. (2020). An uncertainty-aware deep reinforcement learning framework for residential air conditioning energy management. Applied Energy, 276, 115426. [CrossRef]
- Magege et al. (2021). A comprehensive framework for synthesis and design of heat-integrated batch plants: Consideration of intermittently-available streams. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 135, 110125. [CrossRef]
- Meera et al. (2021). Integrated resource planning for a meshed distribution network under uncertainty. Electric Power Systems Research, 195, 107127. [CrossRef]
- Perez-DeLaMora et al. (2021). Roadmap on community-based microgrids deployment: An extensive review. Energy Reports, 7, 2883–2898. [CrossRef]
- Raman et al. (2024). Navigating the Nexus of Artificial Intelligence and Renewable Energy for the Advancement of Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability, 16(21), 9144. [CrossRef]
- Salari et al. (2021). Economic growth and renewable and non-renewable energy consumption: Evidence from the U.S. states. Renewable Energy, 178, 50–65. [CrossRef]
- Sun et al. (2021). A comprehensive techno-economic assessment of alkali–surfactant–polymer flooding processes using data-driven approaches. Energy Reports, 7, 2681–2702. [CrossRef]
- Ulpiani et al. (2021). Expanding the applicability of daytime radiative cooling: Technological developments and limitations. Energy and Buildings, 243, 110990. [CrossRef]
- Ustun et al. (2022). IEC 61850 modeling of an AGC dispatching scheme for mitigation of short-term power flow variations. Energy Reports, 8, 381–391. [CrossRef]
- Vaziri Rad et al. (2020). A comprehensive study of techno-economic and environmental features of different solar tracking systems for residential photovoltaic installations. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 129, 109923. [CrossRef]
- Zhang et al. (2021). Design and experimental investigation of a novel thermal energy storage unit with phase change material. Energy Reports, 7, 1818–1827. [CrossRef]



| Feature/Metric | Traditional Power System | Smart Grid System | AI-Enhanced Smart Grid System |
|---|---|---|---|
| Energy Source Dependence | Primarily fossil fuels | Mixed (fossil fuels and renewables) | Primarily renewable, fossil fuel as backup only |
| Forecasting Accuracy | Limited to basic, static models | Moderate accuracy with traditional methods | High accuracy using advanced AI models (e.g., LSTM, Gradient Boosting) |
| Demand Forecasting | Based on historical averages | Basic load prediction | Real-time, AI-driven demand forecasting with 10-15% improved accuracy |
| Grid Stability | Frequent fluctuations, limited control | Improved stability through smart devices | Enhanced stability with 30% reduction in fluctuations due to predictive optimization |
| Energy Utilization Efficiency | Low, high wastage | Moderate, optimized in segments | High efficiency with real-time resource allocation, 25% increase in renewable utilization |
| Fossil Fuel Dependency | High dependency | Reduced dependency | Minimal dependency (40% reduction), fossil fuels used as backup only |
| Carbon Emissions | High | Moderate | Low, 20% reduction in emissions due to renewable prioritization |
| Operational Cost | High due to fossil fuel and inefficiency | Moderate, with digital monitoring | Reduced by approximately 20% due to AI-optimized resource management |
| Data Management | Limited, manual data logs | Digital monitoring and storage | Advanced real-time data processing and storage (e.g., SQL, HDF5) |
| Grid Adaptability | Static, requires manual adjustments | Adaptive, limited automation | Highly adaptable with self-optimizing capabilities, auto-adjustment every 10 minutes |
| Response Time to Demand Changes | Slow, manual intervention required | Moderate | Fast, automated with AI-driven updates every 10 minutes |
| Cybersecurity and Privacy | Low risk, minimal digital presence | Moderate, basic encryption | High, requires advanced security measures for data protection and privacy |
| Maintenance and Manual Control | High | Reduced, some remote control available | Minimal, AI manages optimization with limited manual intervention |
| Forecasting Model | Technology | Mean Absolute Error (MAE) Reduction | Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) Reduction |
| Gradient Boosting Model | Solar Forecasting | 15% | 20% |
| Neural Network (LSTM) | Wind Forecasting | 18% | 18% |
| Linear Regression | Demand Forecasting | 10% | 12% |
| Metric | Conventional Grid System | AI-Enhanced Smart Grid System | Improvement (%) |
| Renewable Energy Utilization | 60% | 85% | +25% |
| Fossil Fuel Dependency | 50% | 10% | -40% |
| Carbon Emissions | Baseline (100%) | 80% | -20% |
| Performance Metric | Traditional System | AI-Enhanced System | Improvement (%) |
| Power Fluctuation Reduction | 0% | 30% | +30% |
| Grid Stability Improvement | Baseline | +35% | +35% |
| Cost Reduction | Baseline | 20% | -20% |
| Feature | Traditional Grid | Smart Grid | AI-Enhanced Smart Grid |
| Response Time to Demand Changes | Hours | Minutes | Every 10 minutes |
| Data Processing Capability | Limited, Manual | Moderate, Automated | Advanced, Real-Time |
| Required Maintenance and Control | High | Moderate | Minimal |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
