Preprint
Article

This version is not peer-reviewed.

The Mechanism behind Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Aiding Growth and Development and Inhibiting Root Rot in Lycium barbaru

Submitted:

23 November 2024

Posted:

26 November 2024

You are already at the latest version

Abstract

To investigate the potential role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) in the resistance of Lycium barbarum to disease stress, two types of AMF, Funneliformis mosseae and Rhizophagus intraradices, were selected as materials. Lycium barbarum was inoculated with AMF and pathogenic bacteria in potting soil under controlled conditions, and we analyzed the antioxidant capacity of the fungi against root rot and changes in disease-process-related protein activities. In addition, we performed transcriptome analysis to explore the physiological and molecular changes in AMF in the prevention and control of root rot in L. barbarum ‘Ningqi No.1’ cultivar. The results show that AMF can promote the growth and development of L. barbarum plants while also increasing antioxidant enzyme and disease-resistant protease activity. The ‘Ningqi No.1’–AMF symbiont triggered several key biological pathways, including the peroxisomal signaling pathway, after F. oxysporum infestation. In conclusion, AMF can prevent root rot in L. barbarum, providing valuable evidence that AMF symbiotically improves the ability of L. barbarum to resist root rot through its molecular mechanism.

Keywords: 
;  ;  ;  

1. Introduction

Lycium is a Solanaceae plant and a perennial deciduous shrub [1,2]. There are about 80 species, which show a discrete distribution globally, occurring in South and North America, Australia, Eurasia, the Pacific Islands, and South Africa. [3]. Goji berries are nutritionally dense and medicinally valuable, serving as a cornerstone in traditional Chinese medicine and modern health industries, with significant potential in global functional food and nutraceutical markets[4].However, with the increasing market demand for wolfberries from the native Chinese plant Lycium barbarum (L. barbarum), and the continuing development of this industry, long-term cultivation with current intensive cropping patterns could cause problems such as anthracnose, root rot, and powdery mildew in L. barbarum and other plants. This seriously affects the yield and quality of L. barbarum and limits the sustainable development of the L. barbarum industry [5,6,7].
Root rot in L. barbarum is difficult to eradicate and has been called a plant cancer. The leaves of L. barbarum plants affected by root rot are yellow and wilted, and occasionally, half of the plant is affected. The other half can grow new branches. The rot in the rhizomes is reddish brown, the xylem is soft and spongy, and most of the inside of the rhizomes turns reddish brown [1]. According to research, the disease is severe in the field, with contiguous patches where columns of plants die, and specimens replanted after the diseased plants have been dug up usually also develop the disease. L. barbarum root rot is caused by a variety of pathogenic Fusarium spp.: F. solani, F. oxysporum, F. concolor, F. acuminatum, and F. moniliforme are the most common pathogens, with F. oxysporum being the most pathogenic [9]. Currently, the main observed bioprophylactic factors include bacteria, fungi, and actinomycetes [10,11,12].
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) comprise a group of ancient endophytic fungi able to colonize more than 80% of terrestrial plant bodies. They play an important role in regulating plant growth, development, and disease resistance [13]. By forming a clumped branching structure within the surface layer of the plant root system, AMF significantly improve plant water uptake, promote plant growth, and enhance host plant resistance [14,15]. Moreover, AMF compete with pathogenic bacteria for loci to improve the disease resistance of host plants, such as eggplant and tomato, and reduce or delay pathogen attacks on plants [16]. AMF are also able to induce regulation of antioxidant enzyme activity in host plants, which has high potential for preventative applications, the control of soil-borne diseases, and enhancing the resistance of plants to diseases [17]. Ma [18] found that inoculation with a clumping mycorrhizal fungus could induce changes in plant root secretion, regulate the inter-root microbial community, and inhibit the growth of pathogenic bacteria, thus improving the disease resistance of plants. Sheng Min [19] found that L. barbarum had an extremely high infestation rate in his study of mycorrhizal-type plants in saline–alkaline land in Ningxia. Meanwhile, a diversity of soil fungal communities in the inter-root system of L. barbarum was determined via high-throughput sequencing. Guo Huan found that L. barbarum could form clumped mycorrhizae with Glomeromycota. Different species of AMF have different effects on the control of soil-borne diseases [20] and also appear to have different effects on host plant resistance. However, the mechanism behind the action of AMF on root rot in L. barbarum is still unclear.
Therefore, this study took the goji berry cultivar ‘Ningqi No.1’ as the research subject and analyzed its physiological changes through inoculation with AMF and pathogenic bacteria. Through the use of transcriptomics, we analyzed the physiological and molecular regulatory mechanisms behind the mycorrhizalization of L. barbarum seedlings in terms of resistance to root rot, providing a scientific basis and technical support for this approach within the search for safe and effective biological measures to prevent and control L. barbarum root rot disease.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Test Materials

The goji berry ‘Ningqi No.1’ was harvested from the Tsaidam Basin in Qinghai.
AMF Glomus mosseae and Glomus intraradices were provided by the Institute of Microbiology, Guangxi Academy of Agriculture and Forestry.
The L. barbarum growth medium was mixed with pre-sieved sand and soil (1:3, W/W) and sieved through a 2 mm sieve; the sand and soil were purchased from the Shandong , Jinan flower market(River sand: grass peat soil = 3:1). The growth medium set was autoclaved at 121°C for 2 h, twice in 3 days.
A two-stage experiment was established in a light incubator to examine the interactions among L. barbarum, AMF, and pathogens. Seeds were sterilized and inoculated in different groups in AMF growth medium and incubated under light at 28°C for 96 h. After the shoots had grown to 1-2 cm, one L. barbarum seedling was set in each pot. Before transplanting the seedlings, inter-root soil (20 g) containing AMF was sown in layers within the growth medium. In treatments that did not receive AMF, we replaced the AMF with an equal amount of sterilized soil substrate (Figure 1).

2.2. Disease Treatment

F. oxysporum was used as the test pathogen and was donated by the Beijing Beinachuanglian Biotechnology Research Institute.
F. oxysporum was activated and made into a bacterial suspension. On the 45th day after the pot test was established, five root samples (1 cm long) were collected from each group of L. barbarum plants, cleaned, and stained, and the colonization of AMF was examined via ink and vinegar staining (Yang Mu et al.). On the 90th day after the potting test was set up, 15 pots of robust ‘Ningqi No.1’ were selected in each group to be inoculated with the pathogen of L. barbarum root rot, and 20 ml of bacterial suspension was added to the roots.
Four AMF treatments were set up in this experiment: the control without inoculation (C), F. mosseae (M), R. intraradices (R), and F. mosseae, and R. intraradices, mixed homogeneously at a mass ratio of 1:1 with mixed AMF (H).. Two pathogen treatments were set up: inoculation with pathogenic bacteria (G) and without pathogenic bacteria (N). There were eight treatments in total (HG, RG, MG, CG, HN, RN, MN, and CN), with 15 replicate pots per treatment, for a total of 120 pots.
The incidence and severity of root rot in L. barbarum were determined on the 15th day after inoculation with the pathogen. The incidence rate was expressed as the percentage of diseased leaves. Disease severity was estimated using the disease index (DI) calculated according to the disease scale 0-5 [21], utilizing the following formula:
D I = s e l f e m p l o y e d S u m   o f   l e a f   g r a d e s M a x i m u m   c o n d i t i o n   s c o r e N u m b e r   o f   s a m p l e   l e a v e s 100 %
The single-leaf rating in the formula is the disease rating of each leaf of L. barbarum.
The experiment was conducted in a light incubator space with light amplitude during the growth period and an average temperature of 28°C (daytime) and 22°C (night-time).

2.3. Plant Harvest and Measurement of Samples

Total RNA was extracted from 0.1 g of fresh leaves randomly sampled from each pot on the 0, 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, and 15th day, immediately snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen species for 15 min, and stored at -80°C. In addition, 0.5 g of fresh leaves were sampled from each pot as described previously, and enzyme activities, including POD, CAT, and SOD, were measured using a Solarbio kit. We conducted measurements of disease-resistant protease activities including chitinase, polygalacturonase, β-1,3-glucan, and pectin esterase. Subsequently, five pots were randomly selected from the four treatment groups that were not inoculated with F. oxysporum for the measurement of plant height, ground diameter, aboveground fresh weight, belowground fresh weight, aboveground dry weight, and belowground dry weight. Three pots were randomly selected, and the complete root system of L. barbarum was separated from the soil by the water washing method after digging out the ‘Ningqi No.1’–AMF symbiont in the substrate. After that, they were placed in the Epson Root Scanner (GXY-A, China) to be scanned. WinRHIZO Root Analysis System Software was used to obtain the data for the root system of the specific annual symbiont, the total root length, root surface area, mean root diameter, and root volume, with three replicates for each treatment [22].

2.5. Differential Expression Analysis and Functional Enrichment

Differential expression analysis was performed using DESeq2 software, and the functional annotation of differential genes (DEGs) was performed by applying Diamond and ID mapping tools combined with information from the GO database. Through the application of the KEGG database, the genes were also categorized in this study based on the metabolic pathways and functions that they are involved in. The p-values were corrected using four multiple-testing methods (Bonferroni correction, Holm correction, Sidak correction, and False Discovery Rate (FDR) correction). KEGG PATHWAY enrichment analysis was performed using KOBAS (http://kobas.cbi.pku.edu.cn/home.do) and calculated on the same principle as GO function enrichment analysis. On this basis, genes closely related to the pathogenicity of pathogenic bacteria were screened and analyzed [23].

2.6. Statistical Analysis

All analyzed results are expressed as the mean±standard deviation (SD) of three replicates. Multi-group comparisons were performed in IBM SPSS 20 using one-way ANOVA, with P < 0.05 being considered a significant difference. Data were visualized using GraphPad Prism 8.0.2 and SigmaPlot software.

2.4. Transcriptome Analysis of Plant Leaves

While measuring enzyme activity, leaves from day 15 of each treatment (HG, RG, MG, CG, HN, RN, MN, and CN) were selected, and total RNA was isolated using the kit, which was repeated three times for each treatment. The concentration and purity of each RNA sample was determined using a Nanodrop 2000, and RNA integrity was examined by 1.0% denaturing agarose gel electrophoresis.
The sequencing of eukaryotic mRNA was performed by Shanghai Meiji Biotechnology Co. The generated raw sequence dataset has been submitted to the National Center for Biotechnology Information Short Read Archive (SRA) database under the registration number.

3. Results

3.1. AMF Colonization in the Root System of L. Barbarum

On the 45th day of plant establishment in the potting test, F. mosseae and R. intraradices successfully infested the root system of one-year-old ‘Ningqi No.1’ goji berry and formed structures such as vesicles, hyphae, and mycelium (Figure 2).

3.2. Effect of AMF on the Growth Characteristics of L. Barbarum Seedlings

3.2.1. Effect of Inoculation with AMF on Growth Indexes of L. Barbarum

Compared with the control group, other AMF-inoculated L. barbarum plants showed significant increases in plant height, diameter, aboveground fresh weight, belowground fresh weight, aboveground dry weight, and belowground dry weight, all of which were HN>RN>MN>CN, with no differences among the three AMF-inoculated treatments. Moreover, all three of these treatments differed significantly from the control. HN showed the best performance in each index (Table 1).

3.2.2. Effect of AMF Inoculation on the Growth of L. Barbarum

Compared to the control group (CN), the growth of annual L. barbarum seedlings was significantly increased in all treatments at different periods, except at 40 d. At 10 d, the growth rate of MN was significantly higher than that of HN, RN, and CN. At 20 and 30 d, the growth rate of AMF-inoculated L. barbarum was much higher than that of the control group, and HN was the highest. At 40 d, the growth rate of the control group was not significantly different from that of RN and MN, and it was significantly lower than that of HN. At 50 d, the growth rate of all AMF-inoculated groups was significantly higher than that of the control group (Figure 3).

3.2.3. Trends in root system changes in ‘Ningqi No.1’–AMF symbiosis

Compared to the control group (CN), the total number of roots and total root projected area showed RN>HN>MN>CN; the total root length and number of root tips showed RN>MN>HN>CN; and the total root volume showed HN>RN>MN>CN (Table 2). The number of root tips was significantly higher in the RN treatment compared to the other treatments, the total root projected area was significantly elevated in the HN and RN groups, and the mean diameter and total number of root tips was significantly higher in the RN treatment compared with the other treatments (Figure 4).

3.3.1. Effect of AMF inoculation on the incidence and disease index of L. barbarum root rot.

Comparing HG, RG, and MG with CG, the incidence rate of L. barbarum root rot decreased by 53.81%, 52.8%, and 37.56%, the disease index decreased by 37.2%, 37.38%, and 27.28%, and the prevention and control effects were remarkable, reaching 80.97%, 81.35%, and 59.37%, respectively (Table 3).

3.3.2. Effect of L. Barbarum root rot on Antioxidant Enzyme Activities in Seedlings

The mean CAT activities of HN, RN, and MN were 240.5763,182.2705, and116.2026, respectively, within 15 days after inoculation with AMF (Figure 5A). On the 13th d after inoculation, it was found that HG, RG, and MG increased by 838.12%, 682.23%, and 587.24% compared to the CN group.The mean POD activities of HN, RN, and MN increased by 74.69%, 54.95%, and 43.52%, compared to that of CN, in 15 days (Figure 5B). Compared to the CN group, HG, RG and MG increased by 87.23 %, 69.72 % and 58.87 %, respectively.After 13 days of inoculation with AMF treatment, the SOD activity of L. barbarum plants (HG, RG, and MG) inoculated with pathogenic bacteria increased by 34.68%, 27.48%, and 28.06% compared to CN (Figure 5C). The SOD activity of HN, RN, and MN increased by 14.98%, 23.41%, and 9.39% compared to CN (Figure 5C).

3.3.3. Effect of L. Barbarum Root rot on Disease-Resistant Protease Activity in Seedlings

The PE activity of HG, RG, and MG increased by 29.70%, 16.23%, and 13.39% compared to CN. HN, RN, and MN were not significantly different from CN and increased by 9.67%, 6.15%, and 6.89%, respectively. Compared to the control, the PG activity of HG, RG, and MG increased by 74.73%, 64.59%, and 56.18% (Figure 6A).Compared to CN, the activities of HN, RN, and MN increased by 18.41%, 19.80%, and 15.18%, respectively. In addition, compared to CN, β-1-3 glucoamylase in HG, RG, and MG increased by 59.64%, 46.18%, and 41.80%, respectively (Figure 6B). Compared to CN, the chitinase activities of HG, RG, and MG showed an increasing trend and increased by 54.27%, 51.49%, and 42.85%, respectively (Figure 6C). In comparison with CN, HN, RN, and MN were elevated by 26.62%, 25.65%, and 20.99%, respectively (Figure 6D).

3.3.4. Analysis of the Combined Effect of l. Barbarum Root rot Disease on the Activities of Antioxidant Enzymes and Disease-Resistant Proteins in the Symbiont

After F. oxysporum infestation, compared with CG, AMF infestation significantly increased antioxidant enzymes and disease-resistant protein activities in L. barbarum symbionts. Among these, the HG group showed the best performance for all the indexes, especially the expression of CAT activity and chitinase activity. HG effectively activated the disease-resistance mechanism of L. barbarum and strengthened its defense ability against root rot disease. In contrast, CG showed the worst performance for these biological indexes (Figure 7).

3.4.1. Data Quality Control Analysis

A total of 344.83 Gb of clean data was obtained in this study, and 37,175 expressed genes were detected in terms of genome-wide expression analysis, including 27,407 known genes that have been annotated and 9,768 potential new genes. Moreover, a total of 69,230 transcripts were identified, consisting of 25,429 known transcripts and 43,801 novel transcripts (Table 4).

3.4.2. Transcript Matching Evaluation

The filtered sequences were aligned to the reference genome using HISAT2 software. As shown in Table 5, when the proportion of alignments to the reference genome (total mapped) was more than 70%, this indicated that the selected reference genome was appropriate and the alignment results had not been interfered with by the genomes of other species (Table 5).

3.4.3. Differentially Expressed Gene Analysis

At 15 d of F. oxysporum infection in symbionts, a total of 11096 DEGs were identified from HG vs. CG, including 5,520 up-regulated differential genes and 5,576 down-regulated differential genes (Figure 8A). A total of 9205 differential genes were identified in RG vs. CG, including 5379 up-regulated differential genes and 3826 down-regulated differential genes (Figure 8B). A total of 4541 differential genes were identified in MG vs. CG, including 2734 up-regulated differential genes and 1907 down-regulated differential genes (Figure 8C).

3.4.4. EggNOG Annotation Analysis of Differential Genes

Using the software to compare HG and CG with the EggNOG database, we found a total of 1,442 genes for information storage and processing, 1,825 genes for metabolism, and 2,084 genes for cellular processes and signaling. Comparing RG and CG, we found 1,233 genes for information storage and processing, 1,499 genes for metabolism, and 1,716 genes for cellular processes and signaling. Comparing MG and CG, we found a total of 555 genes for information storage and processing, 1380 genes for metabolism, and 822 genes for cellular processes and signaling. HG had a higher number for each function than RG and MG (Figure 9).

3.4.5. Go Function Analysis of Differentially Expressed Genes

Analyzed at the Go functional enrichment Level 2 (Figure 10A,10B,10C)0), when F. oxysporum infested the symbionts HG, RG, and MG, in the biological process, DEGs were enriched to 51, 50, and 49 entries at 15 d, respectively. The numbers of genes enriched by HG were 1498, 3081, and 3541; the numbers of genes enriched by RG were 1249, 2575, and 2960; and the numbers of genes enriched by MG were 635, 1252, and 1401, respectively.
In the cellular component, DEGs were enriched in Go terms such as membrane part, organelle part, organelle, membrane, and cell part. The numbers of HG-enriched genes were 3425, 1379, 2650, 1260, and 4716, respectively. The numbers of genes enriched in RG were 2816, 1190, 2228, 994, and 3905, and the numbers of genes enriched in MG were 1476, 978, 523, and 1811.
In molecular function, there was differential gene enrichment in the Go entries for binding and catalytic activity. The numbers of genes enriched in Go entries for binding and catalytic activity were 4468 and 4330 for HG, 3698 and 3594 for RG, and 1815 and 1897 for MG, respectively.

3.4.6. KEGG Enrichment Analysis of DEGs

The KEGG enrichment analysis of differential genes in L. barbarum is shown in Figure 11A,11B,11C. When F. oxysporum infected L. barbarum in HG, RG, and MG, the differentially expressed genes were annotated to 135, 133, and 123 pathways, respectively. Among the 20 most significantly enriched pathway entries, 7 pathways had P-values <0.05 for HG, 11 pathways had P-values <0.05 for RG, and 12 pathways had P-values <0.05 for MG.
The top five HG p-values after F. oxysporum infestation were found for DNA replication (Rich factor=0.58), Citrate cycle (Rich factor=0.54), Steroid biosynthesis (Rich factor=0.58), Alpha-Linolenic acid metabolism (Rich factor=0.53), and Pyrimidine metabolism (Rich factor=0.51).
Ribosome (Rich factor=0.49), Citrate cycle (Rich factor=0.54), Steroid biosynthesis (Rich factor=0.60), Phagosome (Rich factor=0.47), and Taurine and hypotaurine metabolism (Rich factor=0.71) were the top five results in terms of P-values in RG after F. oxysporum infection.
After F. oxysporum infection in MG, the top five P-values were found for Valine, leucine and isoleucine degradation (Rich factor=0.33), Tyrosine metabolism (Rich factor=0.29), Nitrogen metabolism (Rich factor=0.37), Isoquinoline alkaloid biosynthesis (Rich factor=0.32), and Propanoate metabolism (Rich factor=0.32).

3.4.7. Analysis of DEGs in Defense-Related Pathways in L. Barbarum

In the peroxisome (map04146) signaling pathway (Figure 12A), 17 DEGs were identified in HG vs. control, and 51 DEGs were identified in HG vs. CG The up-regulation of the genes may also promote the enhanced activity of the antioxidant enzyme system in the plant and the up-regulation of the membrane-anchored protein (PEX3) gene Pex19p, the CAT-related Lba07g01760 genes, and the SOD-related Lba06g00182, Lba08g00496, Lba09g01319, Lba09g01375, Lba10g01332, and Lba10g02180 genes .
Sixty-nine DEGs were identified in the plant–pathogen interaction pathway for HG versus control (Figure 12B). In the PT1 system, related genes such as cyclic nucleotide-gated channels (CNGCs) and calcium-dependent protein kinase [24,25,26] (CDPK) were up-regulated and expressed at 15 d, and related genes such as plant respiratory burst oxidase homologue (Rboh) were down-regulated. Upon the recognition of calcium ions by cyclic nucleotide-gated channel proteins in the plant cell wall, calcium-dependent protein kinase was up-regulated, and plant respiratory burst oxidase was inhibited, stimulating an increase in cellular reactive oxygen species secretion and an increase in the expression of related defense genes. Cellular flagellin (flg22) was recognized by receptor proteins (FLs2), and genes such as Lba12g01077 associated with FLS2 were up-regulated, which transmitted the information to the interior of the cell through cellular endocytosis, activated the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and triggered the effects of cell wall reinforcement, the superoxide response, and the enhancement of antioxidant enzyme activities. In addition, FLS2 activated downstream mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEKK), and genes such as Lba01g00615, which is related to MPK3/MPK6, were down-regulated. These signals were transmitted into the interior of the nucleus, and after transmission to transcription factors, Lba03g02584 genes related to the glycerol kinase gene (NHO) were down-regulated.
In the ET1 system, genes such as the SGT1 gene (suppressor of the G2 allele of SKP1) and the HSP90 gene were up-regulated at 15 d. The RPM1 gene and the RPS2 gene were both up- and down-regulated. The expression of HSP90 and SGT1 genes in the symbiont was significantly increased after induction by L. barbarum root rot, which promoted the hypersensitive response (HR) of the plant .

4. Discussion

In this study, we investigated the growth characteristics of one-year-old ‘Ningqi No.1’ seedlings inoculated with different AMFs and found that AMFs had a significant promoting effect on the growth of L. barbarum seedlings. The experimental results demonstrate that compared with the control group not inoculated with AMF, the AMF-inoculated goji berry seedlings exhibited significant growth in plant height, diameter, above-ground biomass, and below-ground biomass, as well as root characteristics, which is in agreement with Zeng's findings on cypress [27].
In addition, the results of the present study are in agreement with those of Richa's studyon Glycine max (L.) Merr., which showed that inoculation with AMF had a tremendous growth-promoting effect on plant height, stem thickness, fresh mass, and dry mass in Glycine max (L.) Merr. Seedlings[28]. Meanwhile, the present study is also in agreement with the results of Zheng on Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge, in which AMF significantly increased the aboveground dry weight, number of leaves, and number of roots of Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge 0.24~0.65 fold, and the contents of active ingredients in the aboveground and belowground fractions were also significantly increased by 0.44~1.78 fold, respectively [28,29,30]. Moreover, the present study found that inoculation with F. mosseae promoted the germination of L. barbarum seeds, which is consistent with the findings of Edgar Omar Rueda-Puente's study on Capsicum annuum L. [31]. Studies have shown that inoculation with AMF promotes the germination rate of host plants, with significant increases in plant height, root length, fresh weight, and dry weight.
AMF inoculation remarkably increased the total number of roots, the number of root tips, the total length of roots, the total projected area of roots, the total surface area of roots, and the total volume of roots of L. barbarum seedlings, indicating that AMF can effectively promote the development of the L. barbarum root system, thus enhancing the water and nutrient absorption capacity of seedlings and promoting their growth and development. In the next stage, AMF inoculation also increased the aboveground and belowground biomass of L. barbarum seedlings, indicating that the symbiotic effect of AMF was not limited to root growth but also promoted the growth of the whole plant. A scanning analysis of the root system further demonstrated the positive effects of AMF inoculation on root development in L. barbarum seedlings, enhancing the root expansion capacity and biomass accumulation. These improved root system characteristics are essential in enhancing plant adaptability and survival, especially in drought or nutrient-poor environments. This is consistent with the findings of Yuan [32] on Ipomoea batatas L., and those of El-Mesbahi [33] on Zea mays L., showing that inoculation with AMF can promote an increase in root tip number and increase the root projection area, root volume, and root surface area. AMF can promote the growth of plant root systems and enhance the accumulation of host plant biomass [34,35,36].
Our study showed that the inoculation of AMF promotes the growth of goji berry seedlings and improves their ability to adapt to the environment. L. barbarum root rot is the most widely spread soil-borne disease affecting the production of L. barbarum and seriously affects yield and quality. Currently, the main control measures for goji berry root rot include selecting and breeding new varieties and chemical control. Although new, disease-resistant varieties have been introduced, such as ‘Ningqi No.7’, ‘Ningqi No.1’ is still the most widely planted variety. Chemical means of control, although effective, cause problems such as pesticide residues, environmental pollution, and resistance in pathogenic bacteria [37]. In HG, RG, and MG, the incidence rate and disease index of L. barbarum root rot were notably reduced. Compared with CG, the incidence of L. barbarum root rot decreased by 53.81%, 52.8%, and 37.56%, the disease index decreased by 37.2%, 37.38%, and 27.28%, and the prevention and control effects reached 80.97%, 81.35%, and 59.37% in HG, RG, and MG, respectively.
The SOD, POD, and CAT activities of L. barbarum seedlings were significantly increased by AMF inoculation. The SOD, POD, and CAT activities of HG were significantly enhanced compared with CG. AMF inoculation significantly activated the antioxidant system of L. barbarum seedlings and improved their ability to scavenge ROS, thus enhancing plant resilience. This is consistent with the findings of Huang on Robinia pseudoacacia L. and Wang on Sorghum bicolor [38,39]. The AMF-inoculated L. barbarum seedlings were also significantly elevated in disease-related protein activities and were able to stimulate the disease defense response in L. barbarum seedlings and enhance the expression of disease process-related proteins in the plant, thereby improving the resistance of L. barbarum to root rot. This is consistent with the results of Pu’s study on Salvia miltiorrhiza [28], in which the inoculation of G. versiforme was able to protect Salvia miltiorrhiza from the effects of Salvia wilt, and the disease-resistant proteases, such as chitodextrinase and β-1,3-glucanases, were significantly increased, which, in turn, protected Salvia miltiorrhiza against F. oxysporum.
By analyzing the transcriptome of L. barbarum leaves inoculated with different AMFs after F. oxysporum infestation, this study yielded 344.83 Gb of clean data, and the analysis of DEGs showed that 11,096, 9205, and 4,641 DEGs were identified in HG, RG, and MG, respectively, compared to CG. Between HG and CG, there was a total of 5,520 up-regulated and 5576 down-regulated differential genes; between RG and CG, there were 5379 up-regulated and 3826 down-regulated differential genes; and between MG and CG, there were 2734 up-regulated and 1907 down-regulated differential genes.
GO functional enrichment analysis further revealed that differentially expressed genes were mainly enriched in key biological processes such as bioregulation, metabolic processes, and cellular processes. KEGG pathway enrichment analysis highlighted several important pathways, including DNA replication, the citric acid cycle, and steroid biosynthesis. These pathways were differently enriched in the HG, RG, and MG groups. This is consistent with the findings of Gao in Citrus sinensis, where genes related to disease-resistant proteases and α-linolenic acid metabolic pathways were up-regulated after inoculation with G. versiforme, which promoted plant growth and resistance against diseases [40,41].

5. Conclusions

We have concluded the following main findings from our study:
(1) Inoculation with AMF significantly promoted the growth and development of L. barbarum seedlings. Compared with the control group, L. barbarum plants inoculated with AMF significantly increased in growth indexes such as plant height, diameter, aboveground biomass, and belowground biomass.
(2) Inoculation with AMF tremendously increased the activities of antioxidant enzymes and disease-resistant proteases in L. barbarum seedlings, and the incidence rate and disease index of root rot decreased by 53.81% and 37.2%, respectively.
(3) Transcriptomic analysis illustrated that AMF inoculation had a significant effect on the genes of antioxidant enzyme metabolic pathways and enhanced the disease resistance and overall physiological state of L. barbarum through a variety of molecular mechanisms.

Author Contributions

MY and GD conceived the idea and designed the experiments. MY collected the data and wrote the manuscript. GD edited and made suggestions to improve the manuscript. ZX, SJ, TL, and ZW reviewed the manuscript and contributed to the discussion. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This research was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Qinghai Province of China (2021-ZJ-962Q) and the Basic Research Program of Qinghai University for Youth Scholars (2020-QNY-3).

Acknowledgments

We sincerely thank our tutors and students at the Qinghai Plateau Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding for their assistance in field work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that this research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as potential conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

D-S, mixed diseased soil sample; H-S, mixed healthy soil sample; L-D, diseased plants (from L. barbarum); L-H, healthy plants (from L. barbarum); OTU, operational taxonomic unit; NMDS, non-metric multidimensional scaling; LEfSe, linear discriminant analysis effect size; RDA, redundancy analysis; VPA, variation partitioning analysis; P, Pathotroph (in FUNGuild analysis); Sa, Saprotroph (in FUNGuild analysis); Sy, Symbiotroph (in FUNGuild analysis); C/N, carbon/nitrogen ratio; TN, total nitrogen; TP, total phosphorus; TK, total potassium; AN, alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen; AK, available potassium; AP, available phosphorus; SOM, soil organic matter; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; ITS2, Internal Transcribed Spacer 2; PEAR, Paired-End reAd merger software; QIIME2, Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology 2; SPSS, Statistical Package for the Social Sciences.

References

  1. Martin,F. ;Van,D..The mycorrhizal symbiosis: Research frontiers in genomics, ecology, and agricultural application. New Phytologist. 2024, 242, 1486–1506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Yang,M.;Ji,S.;Duan,G.;Fan,G.;Li,J..Wang,Z..Staining Methods on Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in Lycium barbarum Roots and the Relationship between Colonization Rate and Soil Factors.Journal of Shandong University (Science Edition).1-11[2024-10-17].
  3. Zhang,D; Xia,T; Dang,S; Fan,G; Wang,Z. Investigation of Chinese wolfberry (lycium spp.) germplasm by restriction site-associated DNA sequencing (RAD-seq). Biochemical Genetics. 2018, 56, 575–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. OĞUZ,İ;OĞUZ,H.;KAFKAS,N..Evaluation of fruit characteristics of various organically-grown goji berry (Lycium barbarum L., Lycium chinense Miller) species during ripening stages.Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 2021, 101,103846. [CrossRef]
  5. Jia,C; An,Y; Du,Z; Gao,H; Su,J; Xu,C. Differences in soil microbial communities between healthy and diseased lycium barbarum cv. Ningqi-5 plants with root rot. Microorganisms. 2023, 11, 694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, Z.; He, K.; Zhang, T.; Tang, D.; Li, R.; Jia, S. Physiological responses of Goji berry (Lycium barbarum L.) to saline-alkaline soil from Qinghai region, China. Scientific Reports. 2019, 9, 12057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Uwaremwe,C.;Yue,L.;Liu,Y.;Liu,Y.;Tian,Y.;Zhao,X.;Wang,Y.;Xie,Z.;Zhang,Y.;Cui,Zeng,W.;Ruo,Y..Molecular identification and pathogenicity of Fusarium and Alternaria species associated with root rot disease of wolfberry in Gansu and Ningxia provinces, China. Plant Pathol. 2020, 70, 397–406. [CrossRef]
  8. He,J.;Zhang,X.;Wang,Q.;Li,N.;Ding,D.;Wang,B.Optimization of the Fermentation Conditions of Metarhizium robertsii and Its Biological Control of Wolfberry Root Rot Disease. Microorganisms. 2023, 11, 2380. [CrossRef]
  9. Osman,N.;Awal,A..Plant tissue culture-mediated biotechnological approaches in Lycium barbarum L. (Red goji or wolfberry). Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 2023, 64, 521–532. [CrossRef]
  10. Semchenko,M.;Barry,KE;De,V.;Mommer,L;Moora,M;Maciá-Vicente,JG.Deciphering the role of specialist and generalist plant–microbial interactions as drivers of plant–soil feedback. New Phytologist. 2023, 234, 1929–1944. [CrossRef]
  11. Neal,JC. Biological control of weeds in turfgrass:Opportunities and misconceptions. Pest Management Science. 2024, 80, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Das,R.;Bharadwaj,P.;Thakur,D..Insights into the functional role of Actinomycetia in promoting plant growth and biocontrol in tea (Camellia sinensis) plants. Arch Microbiol. 2024, 206, 65. [CrossRef]
  13. ALHadidi,N.;Pap,Z.;Ladányi,M.;Szentpéteri,V.;Kappel,N..Mycorrhizal Inoculation Effect on Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam) Seedlings. Agronomy. 2021, 11, 2019. [CrossRef]
  14. Berdeni,D.;Cotton,T.;Daniell,T.;Bidartondo,M.;Cameron,D.;Evans,K..The Effects of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungal Colonisation on Nutrient Status, Growth, Productivity, and Canker Resistance of Apple (Malus pumila). Frontiers in microbiology, 2018, 9, 1461. [CrossRef]
  15. Li,J; Cai,B; Chang,S; Yang,Y; Zi,S; Liu,T. Mechanisms associated with the synergistic induction of resistance to tobacco black shank in tobacco by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and β-aminobutyric acid. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2023, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ma,X;Geng,Q;Zhang,H;Bian,C;Chen,H.;Jiang,D;Xu,X.Global negative effects of nutrient enrichment on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, plant diversity and ecosystem multifunctionality. New Phytologist . 2021, 229, 2957–2969. [CrossRef]
  17. Branco,S; Schauster,A; Liao,H; Ruytinx,J. Mechanisms of stress tolerance and their effects on the ecology and evolution of mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytologist. 2022, 235, 2158–2175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ma,J; Li,Y; Zhou,H; Qi,L; Zhang,Z; Zheng,Y; Yu,Z; Muhammad,Z; Yang,X; Xie,Y. Chitooligosaccharides and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alleviate the damage by phytophthora nicotianae to tobacco seedlings by inducing changes in rhizosphere microecology. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2024, 215, 108986–10.1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sheng,M.;Tang,M.;Zhang,F.;Huang,Y.;Yang,B..Effect of soil factors on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in northwest saline alkaline soil. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2008, 45, 758–763.
  20. Guo,H.;Lu,L.;Su,C.;Duan,G.;Fan,G.. Effects of Microbial Agents on Growth and Soil Properties of Lycium barbarum L. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University. 2022, 53, 476–482. [CrossRef]
  21. Liu,Z; Fan,C; Xiao,J; Sun,S; Gao,T; Zhu,B; Zhang,D. Metabolomic and transcriptome analysis of the inhibitory effects of bacillus subtilis strain Z-14 against fusarium oxysporum causing vascular wilt diseases in cucumber. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2023, 71, 2644–2657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Endo,I;Kume,T;Kho,L.;Katayama,A;Makita,N;Ikeno,H;Ide,J;Ohashi,M.Spatial and temporal patterns of root dynamics in a bornean tropical rainforest monitored using the root scanner method. Plant and Soil. 2019, 443, 323–335. [CrossRef]
  23. Schaarschmidt,S; Fischerm,A; Zuther,E; Hincha,D. Evaluation of seven different RNA-seq alignment tools based on experimental data from the model plant arabidopsis thaliana. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021, 21, 1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chu,X.;Wang,M.;Fan,Z.;Li,J.;Yin,H.Molecular Mechanisms of Seasonal Gene Expression in Trees. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 1666. [CrossRef]
  25. Casamassimi,A.;Ciccodicola,A.Transcriptional Regulation: Molecules, Involved Mechanisms, and Misregulation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1281. [CrossRef]
  26. Tian,W.;Hou,C.;Re,Z.;Wang,C.;Zhao,F.;Dahlbeck,D.Hu,S.;Zhang,L.;Niu,Q.;Li,L.Staskawicz,B.;Luan,S.;A calmodulin-gated calcium channel links pathogen patterns to plant immunity. Nature. 2019, 572, 131–135. [CrossRef]
  27. Zeng,J.;Ma,S.;Liu,J.;Qin,S.;Liu,X.;Li,T.;Liao,Y.;Shi,Y.;Zhang,J..Organic Materials and AMF Addition Promote Growth of Taxodium ‘zhongshanshan’ by Improving Soil Structure. Forests 2023, 14, 731. [CrossRef]
  28. Agnihotri,R.;Pandey,A.;Sharma,M.,Anil,P.;Aketi,R.;Hemant,S.;Rakesh,K.;Raghvendra,N.;Sunil,D..Enhanced soil carbon storage and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal biomass in a long-term nutrient management under soybean-based cropping system. Environ Sci Pollut Res. [CrossRef]
  29. Pu,C.;Ge,Y.;Yang,G.;Zheng,H.;Guan,W.;Chao,Z.;Shen,Y.;Liu,S.;Chen,M.;Huang,L.. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi enhance disease resistance of Salvia miltiorrhiza to Fusarium wilt. Frontiers in plant science. 2022, 13, 975558. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Han,S.;Na,L.;Rongchao,Z.;Hu,X.;Zhang,W.;Zhang,B.;Li,X.;Wang,Z..Study on signal transmission mechanism of arbuscular mycorrhizal hyphal network against root rot of Salvia miltiorrhiza. Sci Rep. 2023, 13, 16936. [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, H.; Hao, Z.; Zhang, X.; Xie, W.; Chen, B. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Induced Plant Resistance against Fusarium Wilt in Jasmonate Biosynthesis Defective Mutant and Wild Type of Tomato. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 422. [CrossRef]
  32. Rueda-Puente,E.;Murillo-Amador,B.;Castellanos-Cervantes,T.;García-Hernández,J.;Tarazòn-Herrera,M.;Moreno M.;Gerlach B..Effects of plant growth promoting bacteria and mycorrhizal on Capsicum annuum L. var. aviculare ([Dierbach] D'Arcy and Eshbaugh) germination under stressing abiotic conditions. Plant physiology and biochemistry:PPB, 2010, 48, 724–730. [CrossRef]
  33. Yuan,J.;Shi,K.;Zhou,X.;Wang,L.;Xu,C.;Zhang,H.;Zhu,G.;Si,C.;Wang,J.;Zhang,Y.. Interactive impact of potassium and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the root morphology and nutrient uptake of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.). Frontiers in microbiology. 2023, 13, 1075957. [CrossRef]
  34. El-Mesbahi,M.;Azcón,R.;Ruiz-Lozano,J.;R-Lozano,J.;Aroca,R..Plant potassium content modifies the effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis on root hydraulic properties in maize plants. Mycorrhiza. 2012, 22, 555–564. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Acosta-González,U.;Leyva-Mir,S.;Silva-Rojas,H.;Rebollar-Alviter,A..Preventive and Curative Effects of Treatments to Manage Strawberry Root and Crown Rot Caused by Neopestalotiopsis rosae. Plant disease, 2024, 108, 1278–1288. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Ku,Y.;Xu,G.;Su,S.;Cao,C..Effects of biological agents on soil microbiology, enzyme activity and fruit quality of kiwifruit with root rot. Soil Research, 2022, 60, 279–293. [CrossRef]
  37. Burns,R.;DeForest,J.;Marxsen,J.;Sinsabaugh,R.;Stromberger,M.;Wallenstein,M.;Weintraub, M.;Zoppini,A..Soil enzymes in a changing environment: Current knowledge and future directions. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2013, 58, 216–234. [CrossRef]
  38. Cariddi,C.;Mincuzzi,A.;Schena,L.;Ippolito,A.;Sanzani,S.First report of collar and root rot caused by Phytophthora nicotianae on Lycium barbarum. J Plant Pathol. 2018, 100, 361. [CrossRef]
  39. Huang,L.;Chen,D.;Zhang,H;Song,Y.;Chen,H.;Tang,M..Funneliformis mosseae Enhances Root Development and Pb Phytostabilization in Robinia pseudoacacia in Pb-Contaminated Soil. Front. Microbiol 2019, 10, 2591. [CrossRef]
  40. Wang,F.;Sun,Y.;Shi,Z.Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Enhances Biomass Production and Salt Tolerance of Sweet Sorghum. Microorganisms, 2019, 7, 289. [CrossRef]
  41. Gao,X.;Zhao,S.;Xu,Q.;Xiao,J..Transcriptome responses of grafted Citrus sinensis plants to inoculation with the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus versiforme. Trees, 2016, 30, 1073–1082. [CrossRef]
  42. Yang,M.;Guo,H.;Duan,G.;Wang,Z.;Fan,G.;Li,J..Role and Mechanism of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in Enhancing Plant Stress Resistance and Soil Improvement:areview. China Powder Science and Technology. 2024, 30, 164–172.
Figure 1. Technical roadmap.
Figure 1. Technical roadmap.
Preprints 140620 g001
Figure 2. Colonization of the root system of L. barbarum by Rhizoctonia solani within the roots.A and B are mycelium, B, C and D are spores.
Figure 2. Colonization of the root system of L. barbarum by Rhizoctonia solani within the roots.A and B are mycelium, B, C and D are spores.
Preprints 140620 g002
Figure 3. Comparison of plant height of ‘Ningqi No.1’.
Figure 3. Comparison of plant height of ‘Ningqi No.1’.
Preprints 140620 g003
Figure 4. Scan of root systems in AMF–‘Ningqi No.1’ symbiosis. (a) Scan of the root system of the mixed group (HN); (b) scan of the root system of RN; (c) scan of the root system of MN; and (d) scan of the root system of CN.
Figure 4. Scan of root systems in AMF–‘Ningqi No.1’ symbiosis. (a) Scan of the root system of the mixed group (HN); (b) scan of the root system of RN; (c) scan of the root system of MN; and (d) scan of the root system of CN.
Preprints 140620 g004
Figure 5. Effect of L. barbarum root rot on antioxidant enzyme activities in L. barbarum seedlings. (A) Trends in CAT activity; (B) trends in POD activity; (C) trends in SOD activity.
Figure 5. Effect of L. barbarum root rot on antioxidant enzyme activities in L. barbarum seedlings. (A) Trends in CAT activity; (B) trends in POD activity; (C) trends in SOD activity.
Preprints 140620 g005
Figure 6. Effect of L. barbarum root rot on disease-resistant protease activity in L. barbarum seedlings. (A) Trends in PE activity; (B) trends in PG activity; (C) trends in β-1-3 glucoamylase activity; (D) trends in chitinase activity.
Figure 6. Effect of L. barbarum root rot on disease-resistant protease activity in L. barbarum seedlings. (A) Trends in PE activity; (B) trends in PG activity; (C) trends in β-1-3 glucoamylase activity; (D) trends in chitinase activity.
Preprints 140620 g006
Figure 7. Radar diagram of antioxidant enzyme and pathogenesis-related protein activity levels in ‘Ningqi No.1’–AMF symbiotic associations post-infection with F. oxysporum.
Figure 7. Radar diagram of antioxidant enzyme and pathogenesis-related protein activity levels in ‘Ningqi No.1’–AMF symbiotic associations post-infection with F. oxysporum.
Preprints 140620 g007
Figure 8. DIFFERENTIAL expression volcano plot.A is HG vs CG, B is RG vs CG, C is MG vs CG.
Figure 8. DIFFERENTIAL expression volcano plot.A is HG vs CG, B is RG vs CG, C is MG vs CG.
Preprints 140620 g008
Figure 9. EggNOG classification summary bar chart.
Figure 9. EggNOG classification summary bar chart.
Preprints 140620 g009
Figure 10. GO classification summary bar chart.A is HG vs CG, B is RG vs CG, C is MG vs CG.
Figure 10. GO classification summary bar chart.A is HG vs CG, B is RG vs CG, C is MG vs CG.
Preprints 140620 g010
Figure 11. KEGG enrichment analysis result chart.A is the HGvsCG enrichment analysis, B is the RGvsCG enrichment analysis, and C is the MGvsCG enrichment analysis.
Figure 11. KEGG enrichment analysis result chart.A is the HGvsCG enrichment analysis, B is the RGvsCG enrichment analysis, and C is the MGvsCG enrichment analysis.
Preprints 140620 g011
Figure 12. Signaling pathway diagram.A is map04146 signaling pathway diagram,B is map04626 signaling pathway diagram.
Figure 12. Signaling pathway diagram.A is map04146 signaling pathway diagram,B is map04626 signaling pathway diagram.
Preprints 140620 g012
Table 1. Effect of different inoculation treatments on the growth parameters of L.barbarum. Different letters in the table indicate significant differences (P<0.05) among various indicators in ‘Ningqi No.1’ symbionts under different treatments.
Table 1. Effect of different inoculation treatments on the growth parameters of L.barbarum. Different letters in the table indicate significant differences (P<0.05) among various indicators in ‘Ningqi No.1’ symbionts under different treatments.
Treatment Height Aboveground fresh weight Belowground fresh weight Stem diameter Aboveground dry weight Belowground dry weight
HN 57.00±15.43a 15.18±7.35a 7.89±6.40a 4.30±0.72a 3.90±1.95ab 5.20±3.65ab
RN 54.60±21.40a 11.93±5.24a 6.26±4.48a 4.01±0.65a 2.38±1.34ab 1.81±1.23b
MN 43.71±11.99a 8.46±3.94a 4.12±2.66ab 3.33±0.45b 2.41±0.32ab 2.36±1.18b
CN 27.09±17.43b 2.88±1.52b 0.76±0.65b 2.23±0.44c 0.93±0.48b 0.39±0.30b
Table 2. Parameters of root systems in AMF–‘Ningqi No.1’ symbiosis seedlings.
Table 2. Parameters of root systems in AMF–‘Ningqi No.1’ symbiosis seedlings.
Treatment Total number of roots Number of root tips Total root length Root total projected area Total root surface area Total root volume Average root diameter
CN 2746 ± 529 b 1734 ± 300 b 836.23 ± 91.19 b 4768.74 ± 701.41 b 14981.43 ± 2203.55 b 4350.30 ± 748.87b 0.43 ± 0.01a
HN 5246 ± 869 a 2205 ±532 ab 1528.67 ± 363.85 a 8666.90 ± 2353.95 a 27227.88 ± 7395.16 a 7753.69 ± 1275.35a 0.46 ± 0.02a
MN 5077 ± 1050 a 2455 ± 546 ab 1634.84 ± 265.16 a 8482.65 ± 1427.42 ab 26649.04 ± 4484.36 ab 5633.69 ± 1059.65a 0.43 ± 0.01a
RN 6338 ± 1150 a 3142 ± 498 a 1877.55 ± 361.88 a 10141.97 ± 2225.95 a 31861.93 ± 6993.01 a 7467.66 ± 2734.90ab 0.44 ± 0.01a
Table 3. Incidence rate, disease index, and control effect of L. barbarum root rot under different inoculation treatments.
Table 3. Incidence rate, disease index, and control effect of L. barbarum root rot under different inoculation treatments.
Treatment Incidence rate Disease index Control effect
HG 13.75 8.75 80.97
RG 14.76 8.57 81.35
MG 30 18.67 59.37
CG 67.56 45.95 -
HN - - -
RN - - -
MN - - -
Table 4. Statistics of the transcriptome sequencing output.
Table 4. Statistics of the transcriptome sequencing output.
CN MN RN HN CG MG RG HG GROUP
49951456 46475274 51554401.3 55658190 49071956 51113339.3 46280264 42515694 Raw data
7542669856 7017766374 7784714601 8404386690 7409865356 7718114239 6988319864 6419869794 Primitive base
48944720.7 45582256.67 50424263.3 53647578.67 47311750.67 49951282.67 44910294 41067138 Clean reads
7266931233 6825129239 7520928583 8009319978 7066515915 7455341015 6694249619 6121374903 Clean bases
96.8533333 97.1266667 96.8166667 97.2166667 97.21 96.9533333 96.7866667 96.8066667 Q20 (%)
94.5166667 94.89 94.4366667 95.0433333 95.0133333 94.6266667 94.3766667 94.4133333 Q30 (%)
42.7233333 42.45666667 42.4033333 42.31666667 42.45333333 42.32333333 42.61333333 42.52333333 GC content (%)
Table 5. Transcriptional mapping information statistics.
Table 5. Transcriptional mapping information statistics.
Sample Total reads Total mapped Multiply mapped Uniquely mapped
HG-1 40552074 38609423(95.21%) 1483136(3.66%) 37126287(91.55%)
HG-2 40436220 38470676(95.14%) 1412317(3.49%) 37058359(91.65%)
HG-3 42213120 40173019(95.17%) 1484422(3.52%) 38688597(91.65%)
RG-1 47432464 45038106(94.95%) 1828490(3.85%) 43209616(91.1%)
RG-2 46208982 43933057(95.07%) 1747784(3.78%) 42185273(91.29%)
RG-3 41089436 39073561(95.09%) 1574836(3.83%) 37498725(91.26%)
MG-1 48905964 46283124(94.64%) 1695796(3.47%) 44587328(91.17%)
MG-2 53053692 50118148(94.47%) 1849052(3.49%) 48269096(90.98%)
MG-3 47894192 45167590(94.31%) 1666538(3.48%) 43501052(90.83%)
CG-1 45863360 42098606(91.79%) 1558693(3.4%) 40539913(88.39%)
CG-2 50489018 46260846(91.63%) 1720050(3.41%) 44540796(88.22%)
CG-3 45582874 41720056(91.53%) 1553915(3.41%) 40166141(88.12%)
HN-1 51497724 48389092(93.96%) 1720144(3.34%) 46668948(90.62%)
HN-2 56842560 53333300(93.83%) 1914805(3.37%) 51418495(90.46%)
HN-3 52602452 49294176(93.71%) 1773999(3.37%) 47520177(90.34%)
RN-1 51755466 49113072(94.89%) 2142014(4.14%) 46971058(90.76%)
RN-2 48393240 45826708(94.7%) 1972168(4.08%) 43854540(90.62%)
RN-3 51124084 48350244(94.57%) 2066359(4.04%) 46283885(90.53%)
MN-1 44065952 41845056(94.96%) 1599851(3.63%) 40245205(91.33%)
MN-2 49442120 46871985(94.8%) 1791651(3.62%) 45080334(91.18%)
MN-3 43238698 40929798(94.66%) 1565924(3.62%) 39363874(91.04%)
CN-1 52580114 50462974(95.97%) 1903266(3.62%) 48559708(92.35%)
CN-2 48787804 46576392(95.47%) 1826575(3.74%) 44749817(91.72%)
CN-3 45466244 43419217(95.5%) 1679233(3.69%) 41739984(91.8%)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Copyright: This open access article is published under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license, which permit the free download, distribution, and reuse, provided that the author and preprint are cited in any reuse.
Prerpints.org logo

Preprints.org is a free preprint server supported by MDPI in Basel, Switzerland.

Subscribe

Disclaimer

Terms of Use

Privacy Policy

Privacy Settings

© 2025 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated