1. Introduction
Bamboo has proven to be a valuable resource worldwide, especially in countries with abundant bamboo resources, such as India, Ethiopia, and Nigeria. In India, bamboo (Botanical name: Bambusa vulgaris, Family: Poaceae) is known as "poor man’s timber" due to its affordability and versatility. As the second-largest bamboo producer globally, India has approximately 15.69 million hectares of bamboo (FAO, 2014) and produces around 189 million tons yearly (Mengstu et al., 2023). The uses of bamboo range from traditional applications in construction and furniture to emerging uses in biofuel, pulp, and paper production (FAO, 2005).
Similarly, Nigeria possesses extensive bamboo resources in both highland and lowland areas. While the economic benefits of bamboo have been widely recognized in other parts of the world, in Nigeria, bamboo’s economic contribution remains underutilized, with its role in rural livelihoods and development still poorly understood. In Nigeria’s two main bamboo species, Bambusa vulgaris and Oxystenanthera abyssinica, have shown promise in supporting economic activities, such as the production of load-bearing composite cement panels suitable for construction (Eugene et al., 2014). Bamboo has environmental benefits as well, such as supporting reforestation efforts, reducing deforestation, and mitigating climate change due to its fast growth, high oxygen production, and tensile strength comparable to steel.
1.1. Objectives of the Study
- i.
determine the sources of fund, labour and transportation mode in bamboo marketing;
- ii.
determine the profitability of bamboo marketing in the study area; and
- iii.
ascertain the constraint face by bamboo marketers in the study area
1.2. Review of Related Literature
Bamboo has emerged as a critical resource in various countries due to its economic and environmental benefits. Globally recognized as an industrial raw material, bamboo supports numerous industries. Ladapo et al. (2017) reviewed Nigeria’s vast bamboo resources and identified potential applications in construction, biofuel, charcoal production, paper manufacturing, and pharmaceutical industries. Eugene et al. (2014) demonstrated that Bambusa vulgaris grown in southeast Nigeria is suitable for creating durable composite cement panels for building structures.
According to the International Network for Bamboo and Rattan (INBAR, 2016), the global export value of bamboo commodities, including furniture, increased from $2.8 billion in 1995 to $4.3 billion in 2005, showcasing the growing demand and economic potential of bamboo. Bamboo’s primary production occurs in Asia, with China being the largest producer, reinforcing the crop's industrial and commercial significance.
1.3. Study Area
The study focuses on the Anambra Agricultural Zone in Anambra State, Nigeria. This region is agriculturally vibrant, featuring fertile plains, warm tropical climate, and adequate rainfall, making it conducive for bamboo cultivation and marketing. Anambra State, located within Nigeria’s Southeast geopolitical zone, is bounded by Kogi State to the north, Imo State to the south, Enugu State to the east, and River Niger and Delta State to the west. Four major markets were selected for this study based on their strategic importance for bamboo trade and accessibility: Otuocha Market, Oye-Olisa Market, Eke-Igwe Nteje Market, and Oye Farm Market.
1.4. Sampling Procedure and Sample Size
Four major markets in the zone were purposively selected Otuocha market, Oye-Olisa market, Eke-Igwe Nteje market and Oye-Farm market at Igbariam. Eke Otuocha market was purposively selected for four major reasons: First, It is more strategically located near River Omambala where it is easily accessed by people of the zone and outside the zone through the river and or roads. Secondly, Otuocha is the headquarters of Anambra East LGA. Thirdly, Eke Otuocha is one of the biggest and good representatives of markets in the zone where bamboo is demanded and supplied, Fourthly Eke Otuocha is closer to the airport for transportation through air. Eke-Igwe Nteje was purposively selected because it is one of the biggest markets in the zone and because Nteje is the headquarters of Oyi LGA. Oye-Olisa Ogbunike was purposively selected because it is one of the biggest assembly markets in Oyi LGA and because Ogbunike is one of the important town communities in Anambra State with important land marks which include a cave and biggest building materials market in the state. The last one (Oye farm) was purposively selected because it is the only farm settlement market of the study area and in Anambra State of Nigeria.
From each of the four markets mentioned in the study area 10 retailers and 5 wholesalers were selected through Snowball Sampling Method (SBSM) which gives a sample size of 60 respondents (40 retailers and 20 wholesalers).
1.5. Data Collection
Primary data were collected using a well- structured questionnaire and interviewed section using two sets of interview schedule (one for the wholesalers and the other for the retailers).
1.6. Data Analysis
Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, gross margin (GM) and 3 points likert scale
Analysis. Gross Margin (GM): Calculated as the difference between total revenue (TR) and total variable costs (TVC) (1)
GM=TR−TVC
Other variables assessed for the analysis were the: total fixed costs (TFC), total variable costs (TVC), total costs (TC), net return on investment (NROI) and net marketing income (NMI). The Net Return on Investment (NROI): Represents the ratio of net marketing income (NMI) to total costs (TC), determining profitability
NROI = NMI/TC (2)
Net Marketing Income (NMI): Calculated by subtracting total fixed costs (TFC) from the gross margin.
NMI = GM - TFC (3)
The bamboo marketing enterprise with the highest NROI is deemed the most profitable. The line calculation method was used to calculate the annual depreciation values of bamboo marketing assets. The annual depreciation Values were determined using this mathematical formula:
2. Results And Discussion
Table 1 shows that 38.6 % of the bamboo marketers in the study area sources fund from co-operative societies, 30% of the marketers sources fund from family members and relatives , 28.3% source fund from micro finance bank and the remaining 5% from commercial banks .
Majority 41% of the marketers use their personal bus and truck for transportation of bamboo to either shop or place of request, while 25% uses wheelbarrow as means of transporting the bamboo to point of delivery in the study area, others 16.6% uses motorcycle and commercial bus as transportation means respectively, which may be very expensive from point of harvest to the shop or place of request.
The majority of respondents were found to utilize hired labour (36.6 %) to harvest bamboo from the forest, 26.6 % use hired and family labour for the harvest, 20 % uses family labour only, it may be to save cost, while the remaining 16 % use community labour.
2.1. Profitability of Bamboo Marketing
Table 2 shows the profitability of bamboo marketing in Anambra Agricultural zone. A total of ₦
4,923,000 was spent by the wholesalers on variable cost alone. The highest amount for wholesale variable cost was spent on purchase at ₦3,001,500 and the lowest amount was spent on security dues of bamboo from vehicles. The total fixed cost was at ₦
2,522,300. The highest amount that was spent on fixed cost is ₦1,246,600 which is on monthly store rent while the lowest amount of ₦400,000 was spent on association due. Also, they spend huge amount of money renting store and on transportation of the bamboo from forest to the location of their shops.
For the retailers, a total of ₦1,783,720 is spent on variable cost. The highest amount spent on any marketing variable is also on purchase of bamboo, and the lowest amount is interest on loan ₦30,500. The total fixed cost is ₦1,241,300. The highest amount of ₦620,000 is spent on association due, and the lowest is also spent on loan interest at ₦30,500. The total revenue generated in bamboo marketing in Anambra Agricultural zone by both wholesalers and retailers are ₦80,500,300 and ₦9,674,054 with net marketing income of ₦928,207.1 and ₦57,038.9 respectively. This means that bamboo wholesales in the area is highly profitable, this is in agreement with (INBAR 2016) which reveals that domestic market for bamboo and rattan products in major producing countries is estimated very high. The net returns on investment for the wholesalers and retailers are at 0.80 and 0.61 respectively.
2.2. Constraints of Bamboo Marketing in Anambra Agricultural Zone
Table 3 shows constraints of bamboo marketing in Anambra Agricultural zone. The variables identified to be the main constraints are shown by three points likert, high, moderate and low. According to the mean score the decision rule 3.0. The table showed that the constraints as identified by the respondents are high cost of bamboo (
= 4.5), high cost of transportation (
= 4.3), poor harvest control bamboo (
= 2.5), high demand (
= 3.5), poor sales (
= 4.3), labour intensive (
= 2.7), poor storage facility (
= 4.3) and bad weather (
= 3.6). High cost of bamboo, high cost of transportation, high demand, poor sales, poor storage facility and bad weather show significance. These agrees with Ogunwusi and Onwualu (2013) whish state that a number of problems are constraining industrial development of bamboo thereby impending potential of bamboo to generate income and alleviate poverty in developing countries, including Nigeria.
3. Summary of Findings, Conclusion and Recommendations
This chapter summarized the findings of the study, made conclusions based on the findings and recommendations made for further study.
Summary of Findings
38.6 % of the bamboo marketers in the study area sources fund from co-operative societies, 30% of the marketers sources fund from family members and relatives , 28.3% source fund from micro finance bank and the remaining 5% from commercial banks .
Majority 41% of the marketers use their personal bus and truck for transportation of bamboo to either shop or place of request, while 25% uses wheelbarrow as means of transporting the bamboo to point of delivery in the study area, others 16.6% uses motorcycle and commercial bus as transportation means respectively. The majority of respondents were found to utilize hired labour (36.6 %) to harvest bamboo from the forest, 26.6 % use hired and family labour for the harvest, 20 % uses family labour only while the remaining 16 % use community labour.
A total of ₦4,923,000 was spent by the wholesalers on variable cost alone. The highest amount for wholesale variable cost was spent on purchase at ₦3,001,500 and the lowest amount was spent on security dues of bamboo from vehicles. The total fixed cost was at ₦2,522,300.
For the retailers, a total of ₦1,783,720 is spent on variable cost. The highest amount spent on any marketing variable is also on purchase of bamboo, and the lowest amount is interest on loan ₦30,500. The total fixed cost is ₦1,241,300. ). High cost of bamboo, high cost of transportation, high demand, poor sales, poor storage facility and bad weather were significance.
4. Conclusions
This study found source of fund, labour and mode of transportation as a major factor considering the marketing of bamboo in the study area. These whole sellers and retailers variables play significant role in the marketing channel of the business in the study area. constraints as identified by the respondents are high cost purchase of bamboo, high cost of transportation , poor harvest control, high demand, poor sales, poor storage facility and bad weather are major constraints face by the bamboo marketers in the study area.
Recommendations
Based on the findings of this study, it is recommended that:
Bamboo marketing’ should be encouraged to gain knowledge production through seminars, workshops and field works to build confidence in them. This will increase profit in the area, especially in value chain.
Government should intervene in the area of transportation by subsidize the price.
More value-chain should be thought in bamboo production and marketing in the study area.
References
- Emeka, N Blesing, C & Lawrence N (2018). Microeconomics analysis of marketing selected non-timber forest product(NTFPs) in Awgu Agricultural zone of Enugu state Nigeria, Asian journal of Agricultural extension economics & sociology 26 (3) 1-7. [CrossRef]
- NV Shende, UT Dangore, NT Bagde & VJ Rathod (2021). Economic analysis of bamboo cultivation in Nagpur district. Journal of phamacognosy and phytochemistry 2021; SP 10(2):91-97.
- Mulat mengstu, Asmanaw Alemu, Abebe Dagnew & Chernet worku (2023). Factors affecting the market outlet choice of bamboo culm producers in Banja district, Awi zone Ethopia. Congent food &Agriculture (2023) 9.2272481. [CrossRef]
- Eugene O.Onuorah, Elias Chukwunonso Nnabuife, Joseph T. Nwabanne (2014). Potentials of bambusa vulgaris grown in southeast Nigeria for the manufacture of wood cement composite panels. Journal of minerals and materials characterization and Engineering Vol 2 no.5, September 2014.
- Ladipo, H.L., Oyegoke,O.O & Bello, R.O (2017). Utilization of vast Nigeria’s Bamboo Resources for Economic Growth: A Review. Journal of Research in forestry, wildlife & Environment Vol9 (2) June 2017.
- FAO (2014). Enhancing the Socio-Economic Benefits from forest, State of the world forests 2024. Rome Italy.
- FAO (2005). World Bamboo Resources. A Thematic study prepared in the Framework of the Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005. Rome, Italy.
- Ogunwusi A. A. & Onwualu, A .P. (2013). Prospects for Multi-Functional Utilization of Bamboo in Nigeria. Chemistry and Materials Research, 3 (8): 58-70.
- INBAR (2016). Country Paper. (Accessed 15th December, 2016).
Table 1.
Respondents’ distribution according to sources of fund, labour and transportation mode of bamboo marketing.
Table 1.
Respondents’ distribution according to sources of fund, labour and transportation mode of bamboo marketing.
| Respondent |
Frequency |
Percentage |
| Source of fund |
|
|
| Family members and relatives |
18 |
30.0 |
| Co-operative societies |
22 |
38.6 |
| Micro Finance banks |
17 |
28.3 |
| Commercial banks |
3 |
5.00 |
| Total |
60 |
100 |
| Mode of Transportation |
|
|
| Personal bus and trucks |
25 |
41.6 |
| Wheel barrow |
15 |
25.0 |
| Motorcycles/Tricycles |
10 |
16.6 |
| Commercial vehicles |
10 |
16.6 |
| Total |
60 |
100 |
| Source of labour |
|
|
| Family labour |
12 |
20.0 |
| Hired labour |
22 |
36.6 |
| Family & Hired |
16 |
26.6 |
| Community labour |
10 |
16.6 |
| Total |
60 |
100 |
Table 2.
Monthly estimates of the marketing costs and returns of bamboo wholesalers and retailers.
Table 2.
Monthly estimates of the marketing costs and returns of bamboo wholesalers and retailers.
| Marketing Variables |
Wholesale (₦) |
Total cost (%) |
Retail (₦) |
Total cost (%) |
| Variable cost: |
|
|
|
|
| Purchase |
3,001,500 |
21.36 |
800,220 |
10.54 |
| Loading |
320,500 |
21.13 |
92,000 |
3.33 |
| Transportation |
500,000 |
2.33 |
79,500 |
2.81 |
| Security dues |
150,500 |
14.37 |
432,000 |
5.26 |
| Off-loading |
450,500 |
13.90 |
150,000 |
5.36 |
| Storage |
500,000 |
14.87 |
200,000 |
5.73 |
| Total Variable Cost (TVC) |
4,923,000 |
87.96 |
1,783,720 |
56.55 |
| Fixed cost: |
|
|
|
|
| Monthly store rent |
1,246,600 |
7.95 |
300,000 |
4.00 |
| Association due |
400,000 |
5.86 |
620,000 |
4.65 |
| Interest on loan |
200,200 |
2.28 |
30,500 |
2.34 |
| Cost of wooden table |
675,500 |
3.27 |
290,800 |
5.08 |
| Total Fixed Cost (TFC) |
2,522,300 |
12.0 |
1,241,300 |
72.01 |
| Total revenue (TR) |
80,500,300 |
|
9,674,054 |
|
| Total Cost (TC = TVC + TFC) |
7,445,300 |
|
542,420 |
|
| Gross Margin (GM = TR - TVC) |
80,008,000 |
|
7,890,334 |
|
| Net Farm Income (NFI = TR - TC) |
793,055,000 |
|
9,131,634 |
|
Mean Net Farm Income (NFI = NFI/n) |
928,207.1 |
|
57,038.9 |
|
Net Return on Investment (NROI = NFI/TC) |
0.80 |
|
0.61 |
|
| OME (TC/TR) |
0.130 |
|
0.135 |
|
Table 3.
Constraints of bamboo marketing in Anambra Agricultural Zone.
Table 3.
Constraints of bamboo marketing in Anambra Agricultural Zone.
| S/N |
Constraints of bamboo marketing |
High |
Moderate |
Low |
|
Std. |
Sig |
| 1 |
Lack of bamboo |
24 |
22 |
14 |
4.5 |
3.16 |
S |
| 2 |
High cost of transportation |
35 |
13 |
12 |
4.3 |
3.12 |
S |
| 3 |
Post harvest control |
14 |
25 |
21 |
2.5 |
2.96 |
NS |
| 4 |
High demand |
31 |
15 |
14 |
3.5 |
2.83 |
S |
| 5 |
Poor sales |
19 |
21 |
20 |
4.3 |
2.41 |
S |
| 6 |
Labour intensive |
21 |
21 |
18 |
2.7 |
2.16 |
NS |
| 7 |
Poor storage facility |
11 |
19 |
30 |
4.3 |
2.04 |
S |
| 8 |
Bad weather |
19 |
13 |
28 |
3.6 |
2.03 |
S |
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).