Submitted:
31 October 2024
Posted:
01 November 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract

Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Source of Samples
- Faecal sludge from ventilated pit latrines (VIPs)
- Faecal sludge from urine diversion dehydrating toilets (UDDTs)
-
Faecal sludge from septic tanks (ST) (also referred as septage)
- a.
- With grey water (ST-wGW)
- b.
- With only black water (ST-BW)
2.2. Experimental Methods
2.2.1. Density
2.2.2. Particle Size Distribution and Zeta Potential Measurements
2.2.3. Measurement of EPS and Total Organic Carbon (TOC)
2.2.4. Penetrometer Test
2.2.5. Rheology and Dilatancy
2.2.6. Filtration-Compression Test
2.2.7. Microscopic Observations
3. Results and Discussion
3.2. Densities and Porosity
3.2. Particle Size Distribution (PSD)
3.3. Zeta Potential
3.4. Extracellular Polymeric Substances
3.5. Penetration Curve
3.6. Rheology and Dilatancy
3.7. Filtration-Compression Cell Test
3.8. Thermogravimetric Analysis
3.9. Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- S. Diener et al., “A value proposition: Resource recovery from faecal sludge - Can it be the driver for improved sanitation?,” Resour. Conserv. Recycl., vol. 88, pp. 32–38, 2014. [CrossRef]
- S. Semiyaga, M. A. E. Okure, C. B. Niwagaba, P. M. Nyenje, and F. Kansiime, “Dewaterability of faecal sludge and its implications on faecal sludge management in urban slums: Faecal sludge pre-treatment by dewatering,” Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 151–164, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s13762-016-1134-9. [CrossRef]
- M. Gold et al., “Cross-country analysis of faecal sludge dewatering,” vol. 3330, 2018. [CrossRef]
- R. J. Stone, E. I. Ekwue, and R. O. Clarke, “Engineering Properties of Sewage Sludge in Trinidad.” 1998.
- B. C. O’Kelly, “Mechanical properties of dewatered sewage sludge,” Waste Manag., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 47–52, 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2004.08.003. [CrossRef]
- Gold et al., “Locally produced natural conditioners for dewatering of faecal sludge,” vol. 3330, 2016. [CrossRef]
- G. R. Blake, “Bulk density,” Methods Soil Anal. Part 1 Phys. Mineral. Prop. Incl. Stat. Meas. Sampl., no. 4433, pp. 374–390, 2015, doi: 10.2134/agronmonogr9.1.c30. [CrossRef]
- P. Arlabosse et al., “Sludge,” in Handbook on Characterization of Biomass, Biowaste and Related By-products, A. Nzihou, Ed. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020, pp. 939–1083.
- M. Kusnierz and P. Wiercik, “Analysis of particle size and fractal dimensions of suspensions contained in raw sewage, treated sewage and activated sludge,” Arch. Environ. Prot., vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 67–76, 2016. [CrossRef]
- Xie, Y. Wu, W. Wang, J. Wang, Z. Luo, and S. Li, “Effects of acid/alkaline pretreatment and gamma-ray irradiation on extracellular polymeric substances from sewage sludge,” Radiat. Phys. Chem., vol. 97, pp. 349–353, 2014. [CrossRef]
- Q. Dai et al., “Investigation on extracellular polymeric substances, sludge flocs morphology, bound water release and dewatering performance of sewage sludge under pretreatment with modified phosphogypsum,” Water Res., vol. 142, pp. 337–346, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.06.009. [CrossRef]
- M. Christine, A. Sene, K. K. Zhanga, S. Penga, and Y. Zhanga, “Sludge dewaterability : The variation of extracellular polymeric substances during sludge conditioning with two natural organic conditioners,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 251, no. April, p. 109559, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109559. [CrossRef]
- S. fang Yang and X. yan Li, “Influences of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) on the characteristics of activated sludge under non-steady-state conditions,” Process Biochem., vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 91–96, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2008.09.010. [CrossRef]
- X. Y. Li and S. F. Yang, “Influence of loosely bound extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) on the flocculation, sedimentation and dewaterability of activated sludge,” Water Res., vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1022–1030, 2007. [CrossRef]
- G. P. Sheng, H. Q. Yu, and X. Y. Li, “Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) of microbial aggregates in biological wastewater treatment systems: A review,” Biotechnol. Adv., vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 882–894, 2010. [CrossRef]
- Suzanne N.S., Food Analysis Laboratory Manual. 2010.
- FAO, Quality assurance for animal feed analysis laboratories. FAO Animal Production and Health Manual No. 14. 2011.
- Nzihou, Handbook on characterization of biomass, biowaste and related by-products. 2020.
- Y.-B. Pambou, “Influence du conditionnement et de la déshydratation mécanique sur le séchage des boues d’épuration.” Université de Liège, Liège, Belgique, 2016.
- Y. B. Pambou, L. Fraikin, T. Salmon, M. Crine, and A. Léonard, “Sludge dewatering and drying: about the difficulty of making experiments with a non-stabilized material,” Desalin. Water Treat., vol. 57, no. 30, pp. 13841–13856, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.1080/19443994.2015.1060534. [CrossRef]
- G. Agoda-Tandjawa, E. Dieudé-Fauvel, R. Girault, and J. C. Baudez, “Using water activity measurements to evaluate rheological consistency and structure strength of sludge,” Chem. Eng. J., vol. 228, pp. 799–805, 2013. [CrossRef]
- M. Mouzaoui, J. C. Baudez, M. Sauceau, and P. Arlabosse, “Experimental rheological procedure adapted to pasty dewatered sludge up to 45 % dry matter,” Water Res., vol. 133, pp. 1–7, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.01.006. [CrossRef]
- Y. Zhang et al., “Optimizing and understanding the pressurized vertical electro-osmotic dewatering of activated sludge,” Process Saf. Environ. Prot., vol. 140, pp. 392–402, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2020.05.016. [CrossRef]
- W. Deng, X. Li, J. Yan, F. Wang, Y. Chi, and K. Cen, “Moisture distribution in sludges based on di ff erent testing methods,” J. Environ. Sci., vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 875–880, 2011, doi: 10.1016/S1001-0742(10)60518-9. [CrossRef]
- S. Li, C. Wang, X. Zhang, L. Zou, and Z. Dai, “Classification and characterization of bound water in marine mucky silty,” 2019.
- L. Olboter and A. Vogelpohl, “Influence of particle size distribution on the dewatering of organic sludges,” Water Sci. Technol., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 149–157, 1993, doi: 10.2166/wst.1993.0037. [CrossRef]
- M. Karczmarek and J. Gaca, “Effect of two-stage thermal disintegration on particle size distribution in sewage sludge,” Polish J. Chem. Technol., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 69–73, 2013, doi: 10.2478/pjct-2013-0047. [CrossRef]
- Kumar, R. Suryakumar, E. Mercer, J. Pocock, and S. Septien, “Determination of Unbound-Bound Moisture Interface of Faecal Sludges from Different On-Site Sanitation Systems,” 2024.
- S. Cetin and A. Erdincler, “The role of carbohydrate and protein parts of extracellular polymeric substances on the dewaterability of biological sludges,” Water Sci. Technol., vol. 50, no. 9, pp. 49–56, 2004, doi: 10.2166/wst.2004.0532. [CrossRef]
- R. Marsalek, “Particle size and Zeta Potential of ZnO,” in ICBEE 2013: September 14-15, New Delhi, India, 2013.
- S. Comte, G. Guibaud, and M. Baudu, “Effect of extraction method on EPS from activated sludge: An HPSEC investigation,” J. Hazard. Mater., vol. 140, no. 1–2, pp. 129–137, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.06.058. [CrossRef]
- 32. S. Peng, A. Hu, J. Ai, W. Zhang, and D. Wang, “Changes in molecular structure of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) with temperature in relation to sludge macro-physical properties,” Water Res., vol. 201, no. February, p. 117316, 2021. [CrossRef]
- G. Peng, F. Ye, and Y. Li, “Investigation of extracellular polymer substances (EPS) and physicochemical properties of activated sludge from different municipal and industrial wastewater treatment plants,” Environ. Technol., vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 857–863, 2012. [CrossRef]
- J. I. Houghton, J. Quarmby, and T. Stephenson, “Municipal wastewater sludge dewaterability and the presence of microbial extracellular polymer,” Water Sci. Technol., vol. 44, no. 2–3, pp. 373–379, 2001, doi: 10.2166/wst.2001.0792. [CrossRef]
- Léonard, G. Blandin, and M. Crine, “Importance of Rheological Properties When Drying Sludge in a Fixed Bed,” Lab. Chem. Eng. Univ., vol. III, no. Kudra, pp. 102–150, 2014.
- Fantasse, S. Parra Angarita, A. Léonard, E. K. Lakhal, A. Idlimam, and B. El Houssayne, “Rheological Behavior and Characterization of Drinking Water Treatment Sludge from Morocco,” Clean Technol., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 259–274, 2023. [CrossRef]
- Li, F. Wang, Y. Chi, and J. H. Yan, “Adhesion and Cohesion Characteristics of Sewage Sludge During Drying,” Dry. Technol., vol. 32, no. 13, pp. 1598–1607, 2014. [CrossRef]
- Hil, E. Judenne, and M. Remy, “The effect of lime treatment on sludge rheological properties,” Technology, no. November, pp. 1–6, 2005.
- T. Mezger, The Rheology Handbook. 2020.
- N. H. Rodríguez et al., “Re-use of drinking water treatment plant (DWTP) sludge: Characterization and technological behaviour of cement mortars with atomized sludge additions,” Cem. Concr. Res., vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 778–786, 2010. [CrossRef]
- Y. Liu et al., “Utilization of drinking water treatment sludge in concrete paving blocks: Microstructural analysis, durability and leaching properties,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 262, no. November 2019, p. 110352, 2020. [CrossRef]
- M. Dignac, P. Ginestet, D. Rybacki, A. Bruchet, V. U.-W. research, and undefined 2000, “Fate of wastewater organic pollution during activated sludge treatment: nature of residual organic matter,” Elsevier.
- Y. P. Ling et al., “Evaluation and reutilization of water sludge from fresh water processing plant as a green clay substituent,” Appl. Clay Sci., vol. 143, no. December 2016, pp. 300–306, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.clay.2017.04.007. [CrossRef]
- H. Li, S. Zou, and C. Li, “Liming Pretreatment Reduces Sludge Build-Up on the Dryer Wall during Thermal Drying,” Dry. Technol., vol. 30, no. 14, pp. 1563–1569, 2012. [CrossRef]
- Léonard, S. Royer, G. Blandin, T. Salmon, L. Fraikin, and M. Crine, “IMPORTANCE OF MIXING CONDITIONS DURING SLUDGE LIMING PRIOR TO THEIR CONVECTIVE DRYING,” no. October, pp. 26–28, 2011.
- Y. Huron, T. Salmon, M. Crine, G. Blandin, and A. Léonard, “Effect of liming on the convective drying of urban residual sludges,” Asia-Pacific J. Chem. Eng., vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 909–914, Nov. 2010. [CrossRef]
- Benlalla, M. Elmoussaouiti, M. Cherkaoui, L. Ait Hsain, and M. Assafi, “Characterization and valorization of drinking water sludges applied to agricultural spreading,” J. Mater. Environ. Sci., vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 1692–1698, 2015.
- Y. Malkin, S. R. Derkach, and V. G. Kulichikhin, “Rheology of Gels and Yielding Liquids,” Gels, vol. 9, no. 9, 2023. [CrossRef]
- T. Ruiz and C. Wisniewski, “Correlation between dewatering and hydro-textural characteristics of sewage sludge during drying,” Sep. Purif. Technol., vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 204–210, Jul. 2008. [CrossRef]
- J. Jiang, J. Wu, S. Poncin, and H. Z. Li, “Rheological characteristics of highly concentrated anaerobic digested sludge,” Biochem. Eng. J., vol. 86, pp. 57–61, 2014. [CrossRef]
- S. Zhang et al., “Analysis of the relationship of extracellular polymeric substances to the dewaterability and rheological properties of sludge treated by acidification and anaerobic mesophilic digestion,” J. Hazard. Mater., vol. 369, no. October 2018, pp. 31–39, 2019. [CrossRef]
- G. Feng, Z. Hu, H. Ma, T. Bai, Y. Guo, and Y. Hao, “Semi-solid rheology characterization of sludge conditioned with inorganic coagulants,” Water Sci. Technol., vol. 80, no. 11, pp. 2158–2168, 2019. [CrossRef]
- P. Sollich and P. Sollich, “Chapter 5 SOFT GLASSY RHEOLOGY,” Rheology, pp. 161–192, 2006.
- J. Vaxelaire and J. Olivier, “Conditioning for municipal sludge dewatering. From filtration compression cell tests to belt press,” Dry. Technol., vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 1225–1233, 2006. [CrossRef]
- P. J. Scales, D. R. Dixon, P. J. Harbour, and A. D. Stickland, “The fundamentals of wastewater sludge characterization and filtration,” Water Sci. Technol., vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 67–72, 2004. [CrossRef]
- Wu, X. Dai, and X. Chai, “Critical review on dewatering of sewage sludge: Influential mechanism, conditioning technologies and implications to sludge re-utilizations,” Water Res., vol. 180, p. 115912, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.115912. [CrossRef]
- M. Raynaud, J. Vaxelaire, J. Olivier, E. Dieudé-Fauvel, and J. C. Baudez, “Compression dewatering of municipal activated sludge: Effects of salt and pH,” Water Res., vol. 46, no. 14, pp. 4448–4456, 2012. [CrossRef]
- J.-C. Raynaud, M., Vaxelaire, J., Heritier, P., & Baudez, “Activated sludge dewatering in a filtration compression cell: deviations in comparison to the classical theory,” Technology, vol. 7, no. 17, pp. 743–753, 2009. [CrossRef]
- Lin and A. B. Cerato, “Applications of SEM and ESEM in microstructural investigation of shale-weathered expansive soils along swelling-shrinkage cycles,” Eng. Geol., vol. 177, pp. 66–74, 2014. [CrossRef]











| FS samples | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VIP | UDDT | ST-wGW | ST-BW | |
| Bulk density g/cm3 | 0.97±0.02 | 1.14±0.03 | 0.83±0.01 | 0.94±0.01 |
| True density g/cm3 | 1.96±0.03 | 1.80±0.05 | 1.92±0.04 | 1.71±0.06 |
| Porosity % | 48.94±1.46 | 62.70±1.93 | 42.48±1.78 | 54.33±1.32 |
| PS < 10 µm % | 19.98±1.31 | 20.21±1.12 | 18.68±0.79 | 13.94±0.48 |
| PS 10-100 µm % | 39.51±2.76 | 42.38±1.99 | 60.28±2.48 | 54.02±2.81 |
| PS 100-1000 µm % | 34.82±1.11 | 32.93±0.97 | 21.04±0.52 | 31.78±0.69 |
| PS >1000 µm % | 5.68±0.02 | 4.47±0.01 | 0.00±0.01 | 0.25±0.01 |
| ZP mV | -17.10±0.88 | -17.30±0.42 | -10.25±0.22 | -12.90±0.37 |
| VIP | UDDT | ST – wGW | ST – BW | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LB-EPS - protein g/gDM | 0.99±0.07 | 0.26±0.07 | 6.80±0.54 | 3.90±0.91 |
| TB-EPS - protein g/gDM | 0.54±0.09 | 0.74±0.27 | 14.47±1.04 | 2.78±0.21 |
| LB-EPS - carbohydrates - g/gDM | 84.03±2.63 | 93.65±3.21 | 326.68±37.91 | 305.88±21.56 |
| TB-EPS - carbohydrates - g/gDM | 136.70±3.71 | 177.27±16.20 | 360.46±26.19 | 328.73±28.68 |
| Prot:Carb ratio | 144.17 | 348.82 | 32.31 | 94.92 |
| Total organic carbon (TOC) g/gDM | 927.44±2.81 | 784.36±36.26 | 1656.05±177.14 | 1389.67±101.20 |
| Variable | Property | Units | VIP | UDDT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fmax | Hardness | N | 1.4±0.11 | 1.3±0.10 |
| Fmin | Adhesive force | N | -0.39±0.02 | -0.34±0.03 |
| S | Rigidity | N/mm | 0.1±0.01 | 0.1±0.01 |
| A1 | Hardness Work performed | N.mm | 8.8±0.66 | 7.8±0.82 |
| A2 | Adhesiveness | N.mm | -3.6±0.11 | -3.5±0.58 |
| - | Cohesive load | kPa | 1.04±0.08 | 0.96±0.07 |
| Yield stress | Flow point | |||
| Gamma (%) | G' (pa) | Gamma (%) | G' (Kpa) | |
| VIP | 0.031 | 47000 | 71.772 | 133 |
| UDDT | 0.027 | 192000 | Out of range | |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).