Submitted:
24 September 2024
Posted:
26 September 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction

- Machine Learning & Power-to-Gas Systems
- Machine Learning & Power-to-Liquid Systems
- Advances in Sustainable Combustion and Fuel Optimisation for Next-Generation Engines
- Machine Learning & Power-to-Heat
2. Review Methodology
- What is main focus area of the study?
- What specific ML techniques are used?
- What application is ML used for?
- What are the main outcomes of the study?
3. Power-to-X Systems: Concepts and Challenges
3.1. What Key Challenges Impede PtX Systems’ Progress?
4. ML: Concepts, Evolution, and Impact
5. Power-to-X and Machine Learning: A Promising Team-Up
5.1. Machine Learning & Power-to-Gas Systems
5.1.1. Coordinating PtG in Multi-Energy Systems
5.1.2. Deep Reinforcement Learning for Dynamic Optimisation
5.1.3. Predictive Diagnostics in PtG Systems
5.1.4. Market Integration and Carbon Capture in PtG Systems
5.1.5. Handling Uncertainty with Data-Driven Robust Optimisation
5.2. Machine Learning & Power-to-Liquid Systems
5.3. Advances in Sustainable Combustion and Fuel Optimisation for Next-Generation Engines
5.3.1. Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF)
5.4. Machine Learning and Power-to-Heat
6. Discussion and Insight
6.1. Summary of Key Findings
6.2. Emerging Technologies: Potential Role of Quantum Computing
6.3. Future Directions
7. Conclusion
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
| REFERENCE | JOURNAL | CATEGORY/SCOPE |
| [106] | International Journal of Hydrogen Energy | hydrogen catalysis and production - Biohydrogen, Machine learning, Nanocatalyst |
| [107] | International Journal of Hydrogen Energy | hydrogen catalysis and production - Density functional theory, Electrocatalyst, Green hydrogen |
| [108] | Energy | hydrogen catalysis and production - Analysis and prediction, Hydrogen production, Machine learning |
| [18] | Fuel | hydrogen catalysis and production - Artificial intelligence, Bibliometric analysis, Deep learning |
| [14] | International Journal of Hydrogen Energy | hydrogen catalysis and production - Control, Hydrogen, Modeling |
| [15] | Gaodianya Jishu/High Voltage Engineering | hydrogen catalysis and production - electrolyzer, hydrogen production, model properties |
| [109] | MRS Bulletin | hydrogen catalysis and production - Autonomous research, Electrochemical synthesis, Energy storage |
| [110] | International Journal of Hydrogen Energy | hydrogen catalysis and production - Artificial neural networks, Biomass processes, Hydrocarbon pyrolysis |
| [111] | Applied Sciences (Switzerland) | hydrogen catalysis and production - Alkaline water electrolysis, Hydrogen production technologies, Hydrogen storage methods |
| [112] | Chemical Engineering Journal | hydrogen catalysis and production - Catalysis, Computational fluid dynamics (CFD), Density functional theory (DFT) |
| [113] | Journal of Energy Chemistry | hydrogen catalysis and production - Algorithm development, Computational modeling, HER catalyst synthesis |
| [114] | Environmental Chemistry Letters | hydrogen catalysis and production - Activated carbon, Bioenergy, Hydrogen |
| [115] | International Journal of Hydrogen Energy | hydrogen catalysis and production - Chemometrics, Data science, DFT |
| [116] | Electrochemical Energy Reviews | hydrogen catalysis and production - Electrocatalysts, In-situ techniques, Oxygen evolution reaction |
| [16] | Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews | hydrogen catalysis and production - Degradation, Demand response, Dynamic operation |
| [17] | Energy and AI | hydrogen catalysis and production - AI, Control, Management system |
| [117] | International Journal of Hydrogen Energy | hydrogen catalysis and production - Computational modeling, Density functional theory, Heterogeneous catalysis |
| [118] | Matter | hydrogen catalysis and production - carbon utilization, catalysis, cheminformatics |
| [119] | Advanced Science | photocatalysis for hydrogen production - carbon dioxide reduction, fischer tropsch, material modeling |
| [120] | Chemical Communications | photocatalysis for hydrogen production - |
| [121] | Advanced Functional Materials | photocatalysis for hydrogen production - biomass exemplifications, DFT-data driven approach, energy carriers |
| [122] | Materials Today Catalysis | photocatalysis for hydrogen production - Carbon nitrides, Hydrogen, Photocatalysis |
| [123] | Chemistry of Materials | photocatalysis for hydrogen production - |
| [124]C | Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C: Photochemistry Reviews | photocatalysis for hydrogen production - Dye-sensitization, Hydrogen generation, Organic and inorganic dyes |
| [125] | Chemical Engineering Journal | photocatalysis for hydrogen production - Electricity, Hydrogen generation, Photocatalytic fuel cell |
| [126] | Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy | photocatalysis for hydrogen production - Bibliometric data, Cluster analysis artificial intelligence, Machine learning |
| [127] | ACS Catalysis | photocatalysis for hydrogen production - CO<sub>2</sub> reduction, machine learning, photoelectrochemistry, halide perovskites |
| [128] | Nanotechnology | photocatalysis for hydrogen production - Biocatalysis, Multiple exciton generation, Photocatalysis |
| [129] | Journal of Composites Science | hydrogen storage - Artificial intelligence, Hydrogen storage, Machine learning |
| [130] | Materials Today Energy | hydrogen storage - Hydrogen storage, Machine learning, Metal organic frameworks |
| [131] | Journal of Energy Storage | hydrogen storage - Dewar–Kubas interaction, First-principles, Functional groups |
| [132] | Nano Research | hydrogen storage - model-driven material development processes, nanomaterials, nanotechnology |
| [133] | Open Research Europe | hydrogen storage - economic requirements, energy transition, porous media |
| [134] | Progress in Energy | hydrogen storage - adsorption, energy storage, machine learning |
| [135] | Fuel | hydrogen storage - Electronic structure, First principle calculations, Machine learning |
| [136] | Chemical Engineering Journal | hydrogen storage - Catalysis, Computational, MOFs |
| [137] | Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews | hydrogen storage - China, Feasibility analysis, Geochemical reactions |
| [138] | Capillarity | hydrogen storage - lattice boltzmann method, navier-stokes equation, Numerical method |
| [139] | Coatings | hydrogen storage - HEAs, high-entropy alloys, hydrogen storage |
| [140] | International Journal of Hydrogen Energy | hydrogen storage - Hydrogen storage, Machine learning, Metal hydrides |
| [91] | Energy and Fuels | Sustainable Fuel |
| [141] | Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews | Sustainable Fuel - Fischer-Tropsch |
| [142] | Journal of Energy Chemistry | Sustainable Fuel |
| [143] | Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry | Sustainable Fuel |
| [144] | Carbon Capture Science and Technology | Sustainable Fuel |
| [145] | Cailiao Gongcheng/Journal of Materials Engineering | Sustainable Fuel |
| [19] | Polymers | Envrionmental, economic, strategy, management, and policy - hydrogen storage (tank), nanocomposite(s), nanotubes |
| [20] | Energy Conversion and Management | Envrionmental, economic, strategy, management, and policy - Economic and environmental impacts, Engineering and theoretical prospects, Hydrogen production |
| [21] | Energies | Envrionmental, economic, strategy, management, and policy - energy footprint, green hydrogen, green hydrogen guarantees of origin |
| [146] | Energy and AI | Envrionmental, economic, strategy, management, and policy - Demand-side management, Dynamic power Dispatch, Energy storage |
| [92] | Advances in Applied Energy | Power-to-Heat - Building energy flexibility, Data-driven, Model predictive control |
| [22] | Energies | PtX - big data, electrolysis, IoT |
| [147] | Catalysts | simulation acceleration - non-thermal plasma reactors, plasma, plasma catalysis |
References
- Shanmugam, G. Fossil Future: Why Global Human Flourishing Requires More Oil, Coal and Natural Gas --Not Less” by Alex Epstein. J. Indian Assoc. Sedimentol. 2022, 39, 58–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Epstein, A. The Moral Case for Fossil Fuels The Key to Winning Hearts and Minds; 2017.
- Tian, Y. Grid-Connected Energy Storage Systems — Benefits, Planning And Operation, Michigan State University, 2018.
- Palys, M.J.; Daoutidis, P. Power-to-X: A Review and Perspective. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2022, 165, 107948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wiatros-Motyka, M. Data (Yearly) Global Electricity Review; 2023.
- Sivaram, V.; Dabiri, J.O.; Hart, D.M. The Need for Continued Innovation in Solar, Wind, and Energy Storage. Joule 2018, 2, 1639–1642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guerra, O.J. Beyond Short-Duration Energy Storage. Nat. Energy 2021 65 2021, 6, 460–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miller, M.A.; Petrasch, J.; Randhir, K.; Rahmatian, N.; Klausner, J. Chemical Energy Storage. Therm. Mech. Hybrid Chem. Energy Storage Syst. 2021, 249–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Child, M.; Kemfert, C.; Bogdanov, D.; Breyer, C. Flexible Electricity Generation, Grid Exchange and Storage for the Transition to a 100% Renewable Energy System in Europe. Renew. Energy 2019, 139, 80–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daiyan, R.; Macgill, I.; Amal, R. Opportunities and Challenges for Renewable Power-to-X. ACS Energy Lett. 2020, 5, 3843–3847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eveloy, V.; Gebreegziabher, T. A Review of Projected Power-to-Gas Deployment Scenarios. Energies 2018, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schnuelle, C.; Thoeming, J.; Wassermann, T.; Thier, P.; von Gleich, A.; Goessling-Reisemann, S. Socio-Technical-Economic Assessment of Power-to-X: Potentials and Limitations for an Integration into the German Energy System. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2019, 51, 187–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stiasny, J.; Chevalier, S.; Nellikkath, R.; Sævarsson, B.; Chatzivasileiadis, S. Closing the Loop: A Framework for Trustworthy Machine Learning in Power Systems. 2022, 1–21.
- Majumdar, A.; Haas, M.; Elliot, I.; Nazari, S. Control and Control-Oriented Modeling of PEM Water Electrolyzers: A Review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48, 30621–30641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.L.; Zhang, Z.D.; Li, G.H. Research on Modeling of Proton Exchange Membrane Electrolyzer Based on Model Hierar-Chical Analysis. High Volt. Eng. 2023, 49, 1105–1117. [Google Scholar]
- Sayed-Ahmed, H.; Toldy, Á.I.; Santasalo-Aarnio, A. Dynamic Operation of Proton Exchange Membrane Electrolyzers—Critical Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2024, 189, 113883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mao, J.; Li, Z.; Xuan, J.; Du, X.; Ni, M.; Xing, L. A Review of Control Strategies for Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) Fuel Cells and Water Electrolyser: From Automation to Autonomy. Energy AI 2024, 100406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iqbal, S.; Aftab, K.; tul Jannat, F.; Baig, M.A.; Kalsoom, U. A Bibliographic Analysis of Optimization of Hydrogen Production via Electrochemical Method Using Machine Learning. Fuel 2024, 372, 132126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shchegolkov, A. V; Shchegolkov, A. V; Zemtsova, N. V; Stanishevskiy, Y.M.; Vetcher, A.A. Recent Advantages on Waste Management in Hydrogen Industry. Polymers (Basel). 2022, 14, 4992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghorbani, B.; Zendehboudi, S.; Zhang, Y.; Zarrin, H.; Chatzis, I. Thermochemical Water-Splitting Structures for Hydrogen Production: Thermodynamic, Economic, and Environmental Impacts. Energy Convers. Manag. 2023, 297, 117599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rey, J.; Segura, F.; Andújar, J.M. Green Hydrogen: Resources Consumption, Technological Maturity, and Regulatory Framework. Energies 2023, 16, 6222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ullah, M.; Gutierrez-Rojas, D.; Inkeri, E.; Tynjälä, T.; Nardelli, P.H.J. Operation of Power-to-X-Related Processes Based on Advanced Data-Driven Methods: A Comprehensive Review. Energies 2022, 15, 8118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Birkner, P. Opportunities of Big Data Tools in Smart Energy Systems.; 2017; pp. 161–177.
- Kim, J.; Qi, M.; Park, J.; Moon, I. Revealing the Impact of Renewable Uncertainty on Grid-Assisted Power-to-X : A Data-Driven Reliability-Based Design Optimization Approach. Appl. Energy 2023, 339, 121015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giddey, S.; Badwal, S.P.S.; Munnings, C.; Dolan, M. Ammonia as a Renewable Energy Transportation Media. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 10231–10239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valera-Medina, A.; Xiao, H.; Owen-Jones, M.; David, W.I.F.; Bowen, P.J. Ammonia for Power. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2018, 69, 63–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Philibert, C. Direct and Indirect Electrification of Industry and Beyond. Oxford Rev. Econ. Policy 2019, 35, 197–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reitz, R.D.; Ogawa, H.; Payri, R.; Fansler, T.; Kokjohn, S.; Moriyoshi, Y.; Agarwal, A.K.; Arcoumanis, D.; Assanis, D.; Bae, C.; et al. IJER Editorial: The Future of the Internal Combustion Engine. Int. J. Engine Res. 2020, 21, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalghatgi, G. Is It Really the End of Internal Combustion Engines and Petroleum in Transport? Appl. Energy 2018, 225, 965–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- E-Fuels Powering a Climate-Neutral Future. Available online: https://www.mtu-solutions.com/eu/en/stories/technology/e-fuels-powering-a-climate-neutral-future.html (accessed on 18 September 2024).
- Wulf, C.; Zapp, P.; Schreiber, A. Review of Power-to-X Demonstration Projects in Europe. Front. Energy Res. 2020, 8, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eveloy, V.; Romeo, L.M.; Parra, D.; Qadrdan, M. Editorial: Advances in Power-to-X: Processes, Systems, and Deployment. Front. Energy Res. 2021, 9, 650510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sajadi, A.; Strezoski, L.; Strezoski, V.; Prica, M.; Loparo, K.A. Integration of Renewable Energy Systems and Challenges for Dynamics, Control, and Automation of Electrical Power Systems. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Energy Environ. 2019, 8, e321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cholewa, T.; Semmel, M.; Mantei, F.; Güttel, R.; Salem, O. Process Intensification Strategies for Power-to-X Technologies. ChemEngineering 2022, 6, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ince, A.C.; Colpan, C.O.; Hagen, A.; Serincan, M.F. Modeling and Simulation of Power-to-X Systems: A Review. Fuel 2021, 304, 121354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Decourt, B. Weaknesses and Drivers for Power-to-X Diffusion in Europe. Insights from Technological Innovation System Analysis. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 17411–17430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sidorov, D.; Liu, F.; Sun, Y. Machine Learning for Energy Systems. Energies 2020, 13, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahmaty, M. Machine Learning with Big Data to Solve Real-World Problems. J. Data Anal. 2023, 2, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saraswat, P.; Raj, S. A Brief Review on Machine Learning and Its Various Techniques. Int. J. Innov. Res. Comput. Sci. Technol. 2021, 110–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aslam, F. Advancing Intelligence: Unveiling the Power of Advanced Machine Learning Algorithms for Real-World Applications. J. Eng. Res. Reports 2023, 25, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schmidt, M. Integrating Machine Learning Techniques for Advancing Industry 4.0: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2023, 1, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mukhamediev, R.I.; Popova, Y.; Kuchin, Y.; Zaitseva, E.; Kalimoldayev, A.; Symagulov, A.; Levashenko, V.; Abdoldina, F.; Gopejenko, V.; Yakunin, K.; et al. Review of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Technologies: Classification, Restrictions, Opportunities and Challenges. Mathematics 2022, 10, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Narciso, D.A.C.; Martins, F.G. Application of Machine Learning Tools for Energy Efficiency in Industry: A Review. Energy Reports 2020, 6, 1181–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tichler, R.; Bauer, S. Power-to-Gas.; 2016.
- Lewandowska-Bernat, A.; Desideri, U. Opportunities of Power-to-Gas Technology in Different Energy Systems Architectures. Appl. Energy 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gondal, I.A. Hydrogen Integration in Power-to-Gas Networks. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 1803–1815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Yang, J.; Pan, X.; Zhu, X.; Zhan, X.; Li, G.; Liu, S. Data-Driven Robust Dispatch for Integrated Electric-Gas System Considering the Correlativity of Wind-Solar Output. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2022, 134, 107454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Z.; Jiang, Y. Quantifying Resilient Urban Energy Systems: Statistical Analysis of Climate Adaptation, Renewable Integration, and Socioeconomic Dynamics. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2024, 101, 105153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, B.; Ge, S.; Liu, H.; Zhang, X.; Xu, Z.; Wang, S. Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks Regional Integrated Energy System Reliability and Low Carbon Joint Planning Considering Multiple Uncertainties. Sustain. Energy, Grids Networks 2023, 35, 101123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siqin, Z.; Niu, D.; Wang, X.; Zhen, H.; Li, M.; Wang, J. A Two-Stage Distributionally Robust Optimization Model for P2G-CCHP Microgrid Considering Uncertainty and Carbon Emission. Energy 2022, 260, 124796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Alirahmi, S.M.; Yu, H. Development and Analysis of a Novel Power-to-Gas-to-Power System Driven by the Allam Cycle for Simultaneous Electricity and Water Production. Energy Convers. Manag. 2024, 319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L.; Wang, J.; Zhong, X.; Lin, J.; Wu, N.; Zhang, Z.; Meng, C.; Wang, X.; Shah, N.; Brandon, N.; et al. Combined Multi-Objective Optimization and Agent-Based Modeling for a 100 % Renewable Island Energy System Considering Power-to-Gas Technology and Extreme Weather Conditions. 2022, 308. [CrossRef]
- Mansouri, S.A.; Rezaee Jordehi, A.; Marzband, M.; Tostado-Véliz, M.; Jurado, F.; Aguado, J.A. An IoT-Enabled Hierarchical Decentralized Framework for Multi-Energy Microgrids Market Management in the Presence of Smart Prosumers Using a Deep Learning-Based Forecaster. Appl. Energy 2023, 333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olanlari, F.G.; Amraee, T.; Moradi-sepahvand, M.; Ahmadian, A. Coordinated Multi-Objective Scheduling of a Multi-Energy Virtual Power Plant Considering Storages and Demand Response. 2022, 3539–3562. [CrossRef]
- Qi, M.; Lee, J.; Hong, S.; Kim, J.; Liu, Y.; Park, J.; Moon, I. Flexible and Efficient Renewable-Power-to-Methane Concept Enabled by Liquid CO2 Energy Storage: Optimization with Power Allocation and Storage Sizing. Energy 2022, 256, 124583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhong, L.; Cui, X.; Yao, E.; Xi, G.; Zou, H.; Jensen, S.H. Optimal Design and Off-Design Performance Improvement for Power-to-Methane System Integrating Solid Oxide Electrolysis Cell with Methanation Reactor. Fuel 2024, 356, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, T.; Chai, L.; Tan, J.; Jing, Y.; Lv, L. Dynamic Optimization of an Integrated Energy System with Carbon Capture and Power-to-Gas Interconnection : A Deep Reinforcement Learning-Based Scheduling Strategy. Appl. Energy 2024, 367, 123390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, B.; Wu, X.; Ghias, A.M.Y.M.; Chen, Z. Coordinated Carbon Capture Systems and Power-to-Gas Dynamic Economic Energy Dispatch Strategy for Electricity – Gas Coupled Systems Considering System Uncertainty : An Improved Soft Actor – Critic Approach. Energy 2023, 271, 126965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, Y.; Wang, Y.; Xu, Y.; Zhao, Y. Low-Carbon Economic Dispatching of Microgrid Considering Generalized Integrated Demand Response and Nonlinear Conditions. Energy Reports 2023, 9, 1606–1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wen, D.; Aziz, M. Data-Driven Energy Management System for Flexible Operation of Hydrogen / Ammonia-Based Energy Hub : A Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach. Energy Convers. Manag. 2023, 291, 117323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Monfaredi, F.; Shayeghi, H.; Siano, P. Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning-Based Optimal Energy Management for Grid-Connected Multiple Energy Carrier Microgrids. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2023, 153, 109292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zaveri, J.C.; Dhanushkodi, S.R.; Kumar, C.R.; Taler, J.; Majdak, M.; Węglowski, B. Predicting the Performance of PEM Fuel Cells by Determining Dehydration or Flooding in the Cell Using Machine Learning Models. Energies 2023, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhixia, M.; Linxuan, Z.; Xing, Z.; Minghao, X.; Tiantian, D. Optimal Scheduling of Integrated Energy System Based on PEMFC-P2G and Inpact of Wind Power and Photovoltaic Uncertainty. Acta energiae solaris Sin. 2022, 43, 441. [Google Scholar]
- Zheng, X.; Xu, Y.; Li, Z.; Chen, H. Co-Optimisation and Settlement of Power-Gas Coupled System in Day-Ahead Market under Multiple Uncertainties. 2021, 1632–1647. [CrossRef]
- Janke, L.; McDonagh, S.; Weinrich, S.; Murphy, J.; Nilsson, D.; Hansson, P.A.; Nordberg, Å. Optimizing Power-to-H2 Participation in the Nord Pool Electricity Market: Effects of Different Bidding Strategies on Plant Operation. Renew. Energy 2020, 156, 820–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Sun, Y.; Liu, J.; Liu, C.; Zhang, F. A Data Driven Robust Optimization Model for Scheduling Near-Zero Carbon Emission Power Plant Considering the Wind Power Output Uncertainties and Electricity-Carbon Market. Energy 2023, 279, 128053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Q.; Li, C. Modeling and Operation Optimization of Hydrogen-Based Integrated Energy System with Refined Power-to-Gas and Carbon-Capture-Storage Technologies under Carbon Trading. Energy 2023, 270, 126832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, L.; Zhou, B.; Chung, C.Y.; Li, J.; Cao, Y.; Zhao, Y. Coordinated Operation of Multienergy Systems With Uncertainty Couplings in Electricity and Carbon Markets. IEEE Internet Things J. 2024, 11, 24414–24427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, W.; Ju, L.; Tan, Z.; Li, X.; Zhang, A.; Li, X.; Wang, Y. Two-Stage Distributionally Robust Optimization Model of Integrated Energy System Group Considering Energy Sharing and Carbon Transfer. Appl. Energy 2023, 331, 120426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, H.; Liu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Wang, L.; Member, S. A Data-Driven Distributionally Robust Operational Model for Urban Integrated Energy Systems. 2022, 8, 789–800. [CrossRef]
- Lakhmi, R.; Fischer, M.; Darves-Blanc, Q.; Alrammouz, R.; Rieu, M.; Viricelle, J.P. Linear and Non-Linear Modelling Methods for a Gas Sensor Array Developed for Process Control Applications. Sensors 2024, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, C.; Wang, L.; Tang, Z.; Gao, R. The Efficient Utilization of Carbon Dioxide in a Power-to-Liquid Process: An Overview. Processes 2023, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, X.; Zhang, S.; Hu, X.; Zhang, C.; Ostrikov, K.K.; Shao, T. Recent Advances in Plasma-Enabled Ammonia Synthesis: State-of-the-Art, Challenges, and Outlook. Faraday Discuss. 2023, 243, 473–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mashhadimoslem, H.; Safarzadeh Khosrowshahi, M.; Delpisheh, M.; Convery, C.; Rezakazemi, M.; Aminabhavi, T.M.; Kamkar, M.; Elkamel, A. Green Ammonia to Hydrogen: Reduction and Oxidation Catalytic Processes. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 474, 145661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, Z.; Zhang, L.; Miao, B.; Liu, Q.; Pan, Z.; Zhang, W.; Ding, O.L.; Chan, S.H. A Novel Combination of Machine Learning and Intelligent Optimization Algorithm for Modeling and Optimization of Green Ammonia Synthesis. Energy Convers. Manag. 2024, 311, 118429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, X.; Zhang, S.; Liu, Y.; Hu, X.; Ostrikov, K.K.; Shao, T. Energy-Efficient Pathways for Pulsed-Plasma-Activated Sustainable Ammonia Synthesis. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 1110–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiong, K.; Hu, W.; Cao, D.; Li, S.; Zhang, G.; Liu, W.; Huang, Q.; Chen, Z. Coordinated Energy Management Strategy for Multi-Energy Hub with Thermo-Electrochemical Effect Based Power-to-Ammonia: A Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning Enabled Approach. Renew. Energy 2023, 214, 216–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, M.; Kim, M.; Dat Vo, N.; Yin, L.; Liu, Y.; Park, J.; Moon, I. Proposal and Surrogate-Based Cost-Optimal Design of an Innovative Green Ammonia and Electricity Co-Production System via Liquid Air Energy Storage. Appl. Energy 2022, 314, 118965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lai, Y.; Wang, Z.; Cui, D.; Han, F.; Ji, Y.; Cai, W. Thermal Impact Performance Study for the Thermal Management of Ammonia-Fueled Single Tubular Solid Oxide Fuel Cell. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48, 2351–2367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, Y.; Yang, Z.; Hou, Y.; Lou, J.; He, G. Part-Load Performance Prediction of a Novel Diluted Ammonia-Fueled Solid Oxide Fuel Cell and Engine Combined System with Hydrogen Regeneration via Data-Driven Model. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 395, 136305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahbabi Saray, J.; Gharehghani, A.; Hosseinzadeh, D. Towards Sustainable Energy Carriers: A Solar and Wind-Based Systems for Green Liquid Hydrogen and Ammonia Production. Energy Convers. Manag. 2024, 304, 118215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, N.; Yang, J.; Yuan, F.; Zhang, X.; Wang, J. Investigation of a Solar-Assisted Methanol Steam Reforming System: Operational Factor Screening and Computational Fluid Dynamics Data-Driven Prediction. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2024, 276, 113044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohammad Nezhad, P.; Arjomand, A.; Panahi, M. Design and Optimization of a Reactive Divided-Wall Column for Production of Fischer–Tropsch Fuel: Unit Operation for Mini-Scale Power-to-Liquid Energy Storage Plants. J. Energy Storage 2024, 84, 110736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pitsch, H. The Transition to Sustainable Combustion: Hydrogen- and Carbon-Based Future Fuels and Methods for Dealing with Their Challenges. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2024, 40, 105638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huy, T.H.B.; Duy, N.T.M.; Phu, P. Van; Le, T.D.; Park, S.; Kim, D. Robust Real-Time Energy Management for a Hydrogen Refueling Station Using Generative Adversarial Imitation Learning. Appl. Energy 2024, 373, 123847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kale, A.; Kadri, U.; Kamble, J.; Badgujar, K.; Kharade, P. Part One: Stability Analysis of Hydrogen-CNG Powered Vehicle. Recent Adv. Electr. Electron. Eng. (Formerly Recent Patents Electr. Electron. Eng. 2023, 16, 572–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sapra, H.; Hessel, R.; Miganakallu, N.; Stafford, J.; Amezcua, E.; Rothamer, D.; Kim, K.; Kweon, C.M.; Kokjohn, S. Computational Fluid Dynamics and Machine Learning-Based Piston-Bowl Optimization for Energy-Assisted Compression Ignition of Low Cetane Number Sustainable Aviation Fuel Blends. Energy Convers. Manag. 2024, 300, 117929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Narayanan, S.R.; Ji, Y.; Sapra, H.D.; Kweon, C.-B.M.; Kim, K.S.; Sun, Z.; Kokjohn, S.; Mak, S.; Yang, S. A Misfire-Integrated Gaussian Process (MInt-GP) Emulator for Energy-Assisted Compression Ignition (EACI) Engines with Varying Cetane Number Jet Fuels. Int. J. Engine Res. 2024, 25, 1349–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmed, S.; Li, T.; Li, S.Y.; Chen, R. Comparative Life Cycle Impact Assessment of Offshore Support Vessels Powered by Alternative Fuels for Sustainable Offshore Wind Operations Using Machine Learning. J. Ocean Eng. Sci. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, L.; Hu, Y.J.; Wang, H.; Li, C.; Tang, B.J.; Wang, B.; Cui, H. Uncertainty Quantification of CO2 Emissions from China’s Civil Aviation Industry to 2050. J. Environ. Manage. 2023, 336, 117624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, F.; Rijal, D. Sustainable Aviation Fuels for Clean Skies: Exploring the Potential and Perspectives of Strained Hydrocarbons. Energy & Fuels 2024, 38, 4904–4920. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, Z.; Chen, Y.; Yang, X.; Yan, J. Power to Heat: Opportunity of Flexibility Services Provided by Building Energy Systems. Adv. Appl. Energy 2023, 100149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vannoni, A.; Sorce, A.; Traverso, A.; Massardo, A.F. Techno-Economic Analysis of Power-to-Heat Systems. 2021, 03003, 1–7.
- Schweiger, G.; Rantzer, J.; Ericsson, K.; Lauenburg, P. The Potential of Power-to-Heat in Swedish District Heating Systems. Energy 2017, 137, 661–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nunna, A.C.; Zong, Y.; Thorsen, J.E. Demand Side Flexibility for a Heat Booster Substation with Ultra Low Temperature District Heating. Sustain. Energy, Grids Networks 2023, 36, 101185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fleschutz, M.; Bohlayer, M.; Braun, M.; Murphy, M.D. From Prosumer to Flexumer: Case Study on the Value of Flexibility in Decarbonizing the Multi-Energy System of a Manufacturing Company. Appl. Energy 2023, 347, 121430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kansara, R.; Lockan, M.; Roldán Serrano, M.I. Combined Physics- and Data-Driven Modeling for the Design and Operation Optimization of an Energy Concept Including a Storage System †. Energies 2024, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lange, J.; Kaltschmitt, M. Probabilistic Day-Ahead Forecast of Available Thermal Storage Capacities in Residential Households. Appl. Energy 2022, 306, 117957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baniata, H. SoK : Quantum Computing Methods for Machine Learning Optimization. 2024, 123, 1–26. [CrossRef]
- Ajagekar, A.; You, F. Quantum Computing and Quantum Artificial Intelligence for Renewable and Sustainable Energy : A Emerging Prospect towards Climate Neutrality. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 165, 112493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Safari, A.; Ali, M. NeuroQuMan : Quantum Neural Network-Based Consumer Reaction Time Demand Response Predictive Management. Neural Comput. Appl. 2024, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pistikopoulos, E.N.; Tian, Y. Advanced Modeling and Optimization Strategies for Process Synthesis. 2024, 81–103.
- Morstyn, T.; Wang, X. Review Opportunities for Quantum Computing within Net-Zero Power System Optimization. Joule 2024, 8, 1619–1640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lai, Y. Entangled Spintronic Modulated High-Performance Ce 2 O 3 Small Polaron Surface State-Based Water Splitting Cells. 2021, 8848–8856. [CrossRef]
- Masiur, S.; Omar, R.; Alkhalaf, H.; Alam, S.; Prakash, S.; Shafiullah, T. Climate Change Through Quantum Lens : Computing and Machine Learning. Earth Syst. Environ. 2024, 8, 705–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elsapagh, R.M.; Sultan, N.S.; Mohamed, F.A.; Fahmy, H.M. The Role of Nanocatalysts in Green Hydrogen Production and Water Splitting. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 67, 62–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maghrabi, L.M.; Singh, N.; Polychronopoulou, K. A Mini-Review on the MXenes Capacity to Act as Electrocatalysts for the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, G.; Luo, E.; Zhao, Y.; Yang, Y.; Chen, B.; Cai, Y.; Wang, X.; Dong, C. Analysis and Prediction of Green Hydrogen Production Potential by Photovoltaic-Powered Water Electrolysis Using Machine Learning in China. Energy 2023, 284, 129302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Annevelink, E.; Kurchin, R.; Muckley, E.; Kavalsky, L.; Hegde, V.I.; Sulzer, V.; Zhu, S.; Pu, J.; Farina, D.; Johnson, M. AutoMat: Automated Materials Discovery for Electrochemical Systems. MRS Bull. 2022, 47, 1036–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bilgiç, G.; Bendeş, E.; Öztürk, B.; Atasever, S. Recent Advances in Artificial Neural Network Research for Modeling Hydrogen Production Processes. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48, 18947–18977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vidas, L.; Castro, R. Recent Developments on Hydrogen Production Technologies: State-of-the-Art Review with a Focus on Green-Electrolysis. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 11363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rakić, E.; Grilc, M.; Likozar, B. Liquid Organic Hydrogen Carrier Hydrogenation–Dehydrogenation: From Ab Initio Catalysis to Reaction Micro-Kinetics Modelling. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 144836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salehmin, M.N.I.; Tiong, S.K.; Mohamed, H.; Umar, D.A.; Yu, K.L.; Ong, H.C.; Nomanbhay, S.; Lim, S.S. Navigating Challenges and Opportunities of Machine Learning in Hydrogen Catalysis and Production Processes: Beyond Algorithm Development. J. Energy Chem. 2024, 99, 223–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teimouri, Z.; Nanda, S.; Abatzoglou, N.; Dalai, A.K. Application of Activated Carbon in Renewable Energy Conversion and Storage Systems: A Review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2024, 22, 1073–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vorontsov, A. V; Smirniotis, P.G. Advancements in Hydrogen Energy Research with the Assistance of Computational Chemistry. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023, 48, 14978–14999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, C.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, H.; Bao, X.; Zhang, J.; Yuan, P. Advanced Catalyst Design Strategies and In-Situ Characterization Techniques for Enhancing Electrocatalytic Activity and Stability of Oxygen Evolution Reaction. Electrochem. Energy Rev. 2024, 7, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ugwu, L.I.; Morgan, Y.; Ibrahim, H. Application of Density Functional Theory and Machine Learning in Heterogenous-Based Catalytic Reactions for Hydrogen Production. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 2245–2267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ng, M.T.-K.; Ismail, A.S.M.; Hammer, A.J.S. A Catalyst Acceleration Platform toward Realizing the Energy Transition. Matter 2022, 5, 4179–4186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loh, J.Y.Y.; Wang, A.; Mohan, A.; Tountas, A.A.; Gouda, A.M.; Tavasoli, A.; Ozin, G.A. Leave No Photon Behind: Artificial Intelligence in Multiscale Physics of Photocatalyst and Photoreactor Design. Adv. Sci. 2024, 11, 2306604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ge, L.; Ke, Y.; Li, X. Machine Learning Integrated Photocatalysis: Progress and Challenges. Chem. Commun. 2023, 59, 5795–5806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shelake, S.P.; Sutar, D.N.; Abraham, B.M.; Banerjee, T.; Sainath, A.V.S.; Pal, U. Emerging Photoreforming Process to Hydrogen Production: A Future Energy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024, 2403795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiménez-Calvo, P. Synergy of Visible-Light Responsive Photocatalytic Materials and Device Engineering for Energy and Environment: Minireview on Hydrogen Production and Water Decontamination. Mater. Today Catal. 2024, 100040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Handy, J. V; Zaheer, W.; Rothfuss, A.R.M.; McGranahan, C.R.; Agbeworvi, G.; Andrews, J.L.; García-Pedraza, K.E.; Ponis, J.D.; Ayala, J.R.; Ding, Y. Lone but Not Alone: Precise Positioning of Lone Pairs for the Design of Photocatalytic Architectures. Chem. Mater. 2022, 34, 1439–1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gonuguntla, S.; Kamesh, R.; Pal, U.; Chatterjee, D. Dye Sensitization of TiO2 Relevant to Photocatalytic Hydrogen Generation: Current Research Trends and Prospects. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C Photochem. Rev. 2023, 100621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ni, J.; Wen, Y.; Pan, D.; Bai, J.; Zhou, B.; Zhao, S.; Wang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Zeng, Q. Light-Driven Simultaneous Water Purification and Green Energy Production by Photocatalytic Fuel Cell: A Comprehensive Review on Current Status, Challenges, and Perspectives. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 473, 145162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hadiyawarman; Wisely, N.; Iqbal, M.; Timuda, G.E.; Darsono, N.; Yuliarto, B.; Khaerudini, D.S. Development of Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting Photoanode: Bibliometric Analysis and Artificial Intelligence Advancement. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2023. [CrossRef]
- Bienkowski, K.; Solarska, R.; Trinh, L.; Widera-Kalinowska, J.; Al-Anesi, B.; Liu, M.; Grandhi, G.K.; Vivo, P.; Oral, B.; Yılmaz, B. Halide Perovskites for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting and CO2 Reduction: Challenges and Opportunities. ACS Catal. 2024, 14, 6603–6622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Banin, U.; Waiskopf, N.; Hammarström, L.; Boschloo, G.; Freitag, M.; Johansson, E.M.J.; Sá, J.; Tian, H.; Johnston, M.B.; Herz, L.M. Nanotechnology for Catalysis and Solar Energy Conversion. Nanotechnology 2020, 32, 42003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huang, S.-J.; Mose, M.P.; Kannaiyan, S. Artificial Intelligence Application in Solid State Mg-Based Hydrogen Energy Storage. J. Compos. Sci. 2021, 5, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Altintas, C.; Keskin, S. On the Shoulders of High-Throughput Computational Screening and Machine Learning: Design and Discovery of MOFs for H2 Storage and Purification. Mater. Today Energy 2023, 101426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kopac, T. Recent Computational Insights into Hydrogen Storage by MXene-Based Materials and Shedding Light on the Storage Mechanism. J. Energy Storage 2024, 97, 112807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dun, C.; Wang, X.; Chen, L.; Li, S.; Breunig, H.M.; Urban, J.J. Nano-Enhanced Solid-State Hydrogen Storage: Balancing Discovery and Pragmatism for Future Energy Solutions. Nano Res. 2024, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gianni, E.; Tyrologou, P.; Couto, N.; Carneiro, J.F.; Scholtzová, E.; Koukouzas, N. Underground Hydrogen Storage: The Techno-Economic Perspective. Open Res. Eur. 2024, 4. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, L.; Allendorf, M.D.; Balderas-Xicohténcatl, R.; Broom, D.P.; Fanourgakis, G.S.; Froudakis, G.E.; Gennett, T.; Hurst, K.E.; Ling, S.; Milanese, C. Fundamentals of Hydrogen Storage in Nanoporous Materials. Prog. Energy 2022, 4, 42013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Li, C.; Dong, S.; Liu, H.; Yang, W.; Li, Y.; Jiang, H.; Ding, Z.; Li, H. Unraveling the Potential of Solid-State Hydrogen Storage Materials: Insights from First Principle Calculations. Fuel 2024, 373, 132340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Guo, Q.; Ding, Z.; Jiang, H.; Yang, H.; Du, W.; Zheng, Y.; Huo, K.; Shaw, L.L. MOFs-Based Materials for Solid-State Hydrogen Storage: Strategies and Perspectives. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 149665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, Z.; Dai, Z.; Yang, Z.; Zhan, C.; Chen, W.; Cao, M.; Thanh, H.V.; Soltanian, M.R. Exploring Hydrogen Geologic Storage in China for Future Energy: Opportunities and Challenges. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2024, 196, 114366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Y.; Guan, W.; Zhao, C.; Zou, X.; He, Z.; Zhao, H. Numerical Methods to Simulate Spontaneous Imbibition in Microscopic Pore Structures: A Review. Capillarity 2024, 11, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hájková, P.; Horník, J.; Čižmárová, E.; Kalianko, F. Metallic Materials for Hydrogen Storage—A Brief Overview. Coatings 2022, 12, 1813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Şenol, G.; Selimefendigil, F.; Öztop, H.F. A Review on Nanofluid, Phase Change Material and Machine Learning Applications for Thermal Management of Hydrogen Storage in Metal Hydrides. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 68, 1178–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teimouri, Z.; Borugadda, V.B.; Dalai, A.K.; Abatzoglou, N. Application of Computational Fluid Dynamics for Modeling of Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis as a Sustainable Energy Resource in Different Reactor Configurations: A Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 160, 112287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lei, Y.; Niu, Y.; Tang, X.; Yu, X.; Huang, X.; Lin, X.; Yi, H.; Zhao, S.; Jiang, J.; Zhang, J. Cu-Based Materials for Electrocatalytic CO2 to Alcohols: Reaction Mechanism, Catalyst Categories, and Regulation Strategies. J. Energy Chem. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, J.; Zhang, T.; Wang, Q. Metal–Organic Framework Derived Single-Atom Catalysts for CO2 Conversion to Methanol. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 2022, 37, 100660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ipadeola, A.K.; Balogun, M.-S.; Aboubakr, M.A. The Advancement of Porous Bimetal Nanostructures for Electrochemical CO2 Utilization to Valuable Products: Experimental and Theoretical Insights. Carbon Capture Sci. Technol. 2024, 13, 100266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Li, Q.; Zeng, J.; Tang, S.; Zheng, H.; Xu, L.; Chen, Z.; Lei, Y. Ultra-Thin Materials for Electrocatalytic CO2 Reduction to Prepare Liquid Fuels. Cai liao gong cheng = J. Mater. Eng. 2022, 50, 56–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Y. Advances of Machine Learning in Multi-Energy District Communities‒mechanisms, Applications and Perspectives. Energy AI 2022, 10, 100187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arshad, M.Y.; Ahmad, A.S.; Mularski, J.; Modzelewska, A.; Jackowski, M.; Pawlak-Kruczek, H.; Niedzwiecki, L. Pioneering the Future: A Trailblazing Review of the Fusion of Computational Fluid Dynamics and Machine Learning Revolutionizing Plasma Catalysis and Non-Thermal Plasma Reactor Design. Catalysts 2024, 14, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]








| Paper | Focus Area | ML Method Used | Application | Key Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhang et al. (2022) [47] | Integrated electric-gas systems | Data-driven robust optimisation (DDRO), Minimum Volume Enclosing Ellipsoid (MVEE) | Wind-solar output correlation in IEGS | Proposes a two-stage dispatch model for integrated electric-gas systems, improving day-ahead and real-time dispatch costs with MVEE uncertainty set. |
| Yang and Jiang (2023) [48] | Multi-Energy Systems (MES) | Deep Neural Networks (DNN) | Real-time decision-making for integrated heat-electricity demand response (DR) | Reduced charging costs and optimised real-time operational decisions without prior knowledge of future conditions. Integrated PtG to reduce renewable energy curtailment. |
| Yang et al. (2023) [49] | Regional integrated energy systems (RIES) | Data-driven two-stage DRO | CCHP-PtG-CCS planning under uncertainty | Uses DRO for planning regional CCHP-PtG-CCS systems, improving reliability and reducing carbon emissions under multi-energy uncertainty. |
| Siqin et al. (2022) [50] | PtG-CCHP microgrid | Distributionally robust optimisation (DRO), Wasserstein metric | Economic dispatch under uncertainty | Proposes a PtG-CCHP system with DRO to improve stability, economy, and low-carbon operation by managing wind and solar uncertainty. |
| Wang et al. (2024) [51] | Power-to-Gas-to-Power (PtG-PtP) and Carbon Capture | Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Multi-Objective Optimization | Integration of PtG-PtP with the Allam cycle for simultaneous electricity and water production | Proposed a novel system combining PtG with the Allam cycle for energy generation, carbon capture, and water desalination, optimizing exergy efficiency and minimizing emissions |
| Li et al. (2022) [52] | Island energy systems | Agent-based modelling (ABM), k-means clustering | 100% renewable island with PtG | Proposes a multi-objective optimisation for island energy systems integrating PtG and desalination technologies, reducing costs and improving weather resilience. |
| Mansouri et al. (2023) [53] | Multi-energy microgrids | Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), IoT-based prediction | Market management for smart prosumers | Proposes an IoT-enabled hierarchical framework for multi-energy microgrid market management using deep learning to optimise demand response strategies. |
| Ghasemi Olanlari et al. (2022) [54] | Multi-energy virtual power plants (MEVPP) | Fuzzy satisfying approach, Epsilon-constraint method | VPP with PtG and demand response integration | Develops an optimal scheduling model for MEVPP integrating PtG, renewable energy, and demand response to maximise profit and minimise emissions. |
| Qi et al. (2022) [55] | Energy storage in PtM process, techno-economic evaluation | Artificial neural network-based surrogate optimization | Design and optimization of the PtM-LCES process using a renewable power mix | Demonstrated that integrating LCES in the PtM process enhances profitability and energy efficiency, and reduces methane production costs, making it competitive with fossil natural gas. |
| Zhong et al. (2024) [56] | Power-to-Methane (PtM) with SOEC integration | No specific ML method, focuses on optimisation algorithms | Solid oxide electrolysis and methanation reactor optimisation | Optimised off-design performance of Power-to-Methane systems, enhancing operational flexibility and efficiency. |
| Liang et al. (2024) [57] | Integrated energy system with CCS-PtG | Twin Delayed Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (TD3) | Real-time scheduling for low-carbon energy | Uses DRL to dynamically optimise scheduling in CCS-PtG systems, lowering carbon emissions and operational costs. |
| B. Zhang et al. (2023) [58] | Integrated CCS and PtG systems | Soft Actor-Critic (SAC) with Prioritized Experience Replay (PER) | Dynamic energy dispatch optimisation | Improved system flexibility and reduced operational costs through SAC-based real-time optimisation in CCS-PtG systems. |
| Cui et al. (2023) | Low-carbon economic dispatch of microgrid | Soft Actor-Critic (SAC), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) | Electricity-gas-heat coupling with PtG | Proposes a low-carbon dispatch model with SAC to reduce microgrid CO2 emissions and operational costs by optimising electricity-gas-heat coupling and PtG. |
| Wen and Aziz (2023) [59] | CCS and PtG integration | Multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) | Carbon capture and energy system optimisation | Proposes a model for integrating carbon capture and PtG systems using MARL to optimise energy management and reduce emissions in energy systems. |
| Monfaredi et al. (2023) [61] | Optimal Energy Management in Microgrids | Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning (MA-DRL) | Energy management in grid-connected microgrids | Developed a robust MA-DRL-based strategy to coordinate multiple energy carriers, reducing emissions and costs while optimising microgrid operations. |
| Zaveri et al. (2023) [62] | PEM Fuel Cells (PEMFC) in PtG systems | Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree, Random Forest, ANN | PEMFC diagnostics for failure prediction | Machine learning model predicts PEMFC failures like dehydration and flooding, improving reliability and stability in PtG systems. |
| Ma et al. (2022) [63] | Hybrid PEMFC-PtG systems | Wavelet transform-neural network | PEMFC-PtG under renewable uncertainty | Proposes a hybrid PEMFC-PtG system optimised with ML for renewable integration, reducing operating costs and emissions. |
| Zheng et al. (2021) [64] | Electricity-gas systems | Stochastic co-optimisation, Sequential Mixed-Integer Second-Order Cone Programming (SOC) | Day-ahead market participation | Co-optimises electricity and gas systems in day-ahead markets under uncertainty using PtG, with new pricing and settlement mechanisms. |
| Janke et al. (2020) [65] | Power-to-X (PtX) systems | Artificial Neural Network (ANN) | Electricity price forecasting | Developed price-independent order (PIO) strategy for hydrogen production to optimise bidding strategies in day-ahead markets |
| Zheng et al. (2024) [68] | Multi-energy systems under uncertainty | Clayton copula-based joint probability distribution, DRO | Uncertainty management in carbon-electricity markets | Proposes a DRO model for coordinating MES interactions and mitigating uncertainty in carbon and electricity markets using PtG integration. |
| Li et al. (2023) [66] | Near-zero carbon emission power plants (NZCEP) | K-means clustering, Data-driven robust optimisation (DSRO) | Scheduling under electricity-carbon markets | Proposes a DSRO model for scheduling NZCEPs, optimising renewable energy consumption and carbon credit generation under electricity-carbon market. |
| Wu and Li (2023) [67] | Hydrogen-based integrated energy systems (HIES) | Wasserstein metric-based DRO | HIES with PtG and carbon trading | Proposes a WDRO model for optimising HIES with PtG and CCS under carbon trading and renewable uncertainty, reducing operational costs and emissions. |
| Fan et al. (2023) [69] | Integrated energy systems (IES) | Kernel Density Estimation (KDE), Wasserstein metric | Energy sharing and carbon transfer optimisation | Develops a two-stage DRO for energy sharing and carbon transfer in IES, reducing carbon emissions and improving resource allocation with CCUS and PtG integration. |
| Gao et al. (2022) [70] | Urban integrated energy systems (UIES) | Distributionally robust optimisation (DRO), Norm-1 and Norm-inf constraints | UIES with wind power uncertainty | Proposes a DDRO model for urban integrated energy systems, optimising energy purchases and mitigating wind power uncertainty using norm-based constraints. |
| Lakhmi et al. (2024) [71] | Process Control in Power-to-X Systems | Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Partial Least Squares (PLS) | Gas sensor array for process control and gas mixture composition detection | Built sensor arrays for monitoring gases in Power-to-X systems; ANN proved more effective for methane detection than linear models. |
| Paper | Focus Area | ML Method Used | Application | Key Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deng et al. (2024) [75] | Green ammonia synthesis | Bald eagle search algorithm, sparse identification | Optimising ammonia reactor design | Improved ammonia yield by optimising reactor parameters using time-series data analysis. |
| Zeng et al. (2023) [76] | Plasma-assisted ammonia synthesis | Bayesian Neural Network (BNN) | Optimising plasma catalysis for ammonia production | Enhanced energy efficiency through pulse voltage and gap optimisation. |
| Xiong et al. (2023) [77] | Power-to-Ammonia in multi-energy hubs | Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) | Energy flow optimisation in multi-energy hubs | Maximised ammonia production and minimised operational costs with renewable energy. |
| Qi et al. (2022) [78] | Power-to-Ammonia with LAES integration | Surrogate-based optimisation | Co-production of green ammonia and electricity | Achieved cost-optimal system configuration and enhanced flexibility. |
| Lai et al. (2023) [79] | Ammonia-fueled solid oxide fuel cells | No ML used; thermal management model analysis | Optimising SOFC performance for ammonia fuel | Developed a thermal management model to improve temperature distribution in SOFCs. |
| Du et al. (2023) [80] | SOFC and rotary engine systems | Data-driven model using optimisation algorithms | Part-load performance optimisation for SOFC systems | Improved energy output and efficiency, especially under partial loads. |
| Ahbabi Saray et al. (2024) [81] | Dual hydrogen and ammonia production | Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Genetic Algorithm (GA) | Renewable-powered hydrogen and ammonia co-production | Balanced hydrogen and ammonia production with optimised energy system performance. |
| Zhao et al. (2024) [82] | Hydrogen production from methanol | GA-Back Propagation Neural Network (GA-BPNN) | Solar-assisted methanol steam reforming for hydrogen production | Optimised operational parameters for enhanced hydrogen yield and system efficiency. |
| Mohammad Nezhad et al. (2024) [83] | Fischer-Tropsch fuel production | Surrogate model, Genetic Algorithm (GA) | Small-scale hydrocarbon fuel production | Optimised Fischer-Tropsch process, enhancing the efficiency of localised fuel storage. |
| Mashhadimoslem et al. (2023) [74] | Green ammonia synthesis using nickel-based catalysts | Machine learning for catalyst optimisation | Catalytic decomposition in green ammonia production | Used ML to optimise nickel-based catalysts for hydrogen production, improving efficiency and reducing costs. |
| Paper | Focus Area | ML Method Used | Application | Key Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitsch (2024) [84] | Hydrogen and Carbon-based Fuel Combustion | Data-driven modelling | Combustion simulations for hydrogen and carbon-based fuels | Integrated ML and physics-based models to address non-linear interactions in turbulent combustion, enhancing fuel efficiency and reducing emissions. |
| Huy et al. (2024) [85] | Hydrogen Refueling Station Optimisation | Generative Adversarial Imitation Learning (GAIL) | Real-time energy management in hydrogen refueling stations | Developed an ML-based energy management model that mimics expert strategies to optimise hydrogen production and electricity generation, improving efficiency and flexibility. |
| Kale et al. (2023) [86] | Hydrogen-CNG Hybrid Vehicles | MIMO system models, Bode plots | Stability analysis of hydrogen-CNG powered vehicles | Analyzed vehicle stability and control using transfer functions to ensure the operational feasibility of hydrogen-CNG hybrid fuel systems. |
| Sapra et al. (2024) [87] | Engine Design for Low-Cetane Aviation Fuels | Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) | Piston-bowl design optimisation for low-cetane fuel blends | Combined CFD and ML to optimise engine geometries, reducing ignition delays and enhancing fuel efficiency in sustainable aviation fuel blends. |
| Narayanan et al. (2024) [88] | Energy-Assisted Compression Ignition (EACI) Engines | Misfire-Integrated Gaussian Process (MInt-GP) | Control system optimisation for varying cetane number jet fuels | Developed a physics-integrated GP model to predict combustion profiles, offering up to 80 times faster computation than CFD, improving control system training. |
| Yang et al. (2023) [90] | Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) Emissions | Backpropagation Neural Network (BPNN), Monte Carlo | CO₂ emission quantification in China’s civil aviation industry | Used ML to address uncertainties in aviation demand and policy, showing SAFs must account for up to 70% of aviation fuel to meet decarbonisation goals. |
| Wang and Rijal (2024) [91] | SAF Development and Optimisation | Neural Networks, Quantum Chemistry-Based Simulations | Optimisation of SAF molecular structures (strained hydrocarbons and cycloalkanes) | Employed ML to optimise fuel molecular structures, enhancing SAF stability and combustion efficiency, while providing a techno-economic assessment of SAF scalability. |
| Paper | Focus Area | ML Method Used | Application | Key Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liu et al. (2023) [92] | Power-to-Heat systems in building energy flexibility | Model Predictive Control (MPC) | Flexibility services for buildings | Use of MPC to dynamically adjust energy consumption in response to real-time data, enhancing energy flexibility in building systems and renewable energy integration. |
| Nunna et al. (2023) [95] | Ultra-low temperature district heating (ULTDH) | Genetic Algorithm (GA) | Optimising hot water storage charging and electricity price signals | Demonstrated significant cost savings and enhanced demand-side flexibility by integrating Power-to-Heat systems with district heating using GA-based optimisation. |
| Fleschutz et al. (2023) [96] | Multi-energy systems (MES) flexibility | Not explicitly ML, focus on demand-side flexibility | MES in manufacturing companies, integrating flexible energy storage | Highlights the transition of companies from energy prosumers to flexumers, using demand-side flexibility for cost and emission reductions. |
| Lange and Kaltschmitt (2022) [98] | Power-to-Heat residential storage systems | Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) | Day-ahead probabilistic forecasts of storage capacities | Improved the accuracy and reliability of renewable energy integration through LSTM-based forecasts, optimising thermal storage operations in PtH systems. |
| Kansara et al. (2024) [97] | Energy system optimisation with Power-to-Heat | Hybrid (Physics-driven and Data-driven models) | Power-to-Heat systems integrated with renewable sources | Achieved 37% reduction in computational time for system optimisation without compromising solution accuracy, using a hybrid modelling approach. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
