Submitted:
01 August 2025
Posted:
04 August 2025
Read the latest preprint version here
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
1.1. Research Background and Problem Formulation
1.2. Research Objectives and Theoretical Innovations
2. Core Points of Vacuum Dynamics Theory
2.1. Principle of Spacetime Covariance
2.2. Principle of Relative Change of Light Speed [3,4]
2.3. Principle of Spacetime-Light Speed Covariance
2.4. Energy Difference Caused by Light Speed Difference
2.4.1. Redshift Caused by Light Speed Difference
2.4.2. Internal Energy Difference Caused by Light Speed Difference
2.4.3. Division of Energy Spaces
- High-energy space: a space with a relatively high speed of light (∇c=0).
- Low-energy space: a space with a relatively low speed of light (∇c=0).
- Variable-energy space: a space where the speed of light changes continuously(∇c≠0) .
2.5. Spontaneous Motion of Objects in Vacuum
2.5.1. Motive and Energy Source of Spontaneous Motion
2.5.2. Spontaneous Force of Objects
2.5.3. Acceleration Related to Spontaneous Force
2.6. Important Conclusions of Vacuum Dynamics Theory and Its Connection with Relativity
3. Interpretation of Universal Gravitation by Vacuum Dynamics Theory
3.1. Gravitational Acceleration and Vacuum Dynamics Hypothesis
3.1.1. Classical Gravitational Basis
3.1.2. Equivalence Hypothesis and Derivation
3.1.3. Finding the Radial Distribution Function c(r) of the Light Speed Field
3.2. Analysis of the Light Speed Field Equation c(r)
3.2.1. Gravitational Effect Generated by the Light Speed Field
3.2.2. Covariant Law Between the Light Speed Distribution Function c(r) and Space-Time Scales
Mathematical Derivation of the Covariance Between the Light Speed Field and Space-Time
- ∆s, ∆t, and c are the space interval, time interval, and intrinsic light speed far away from the gravitational source (approximately flat space-time), respectively;
- ∆s(r), ∆t(r), and c(r) are the space interval, time interval, and local light speed at a distance r from the center of the gravitational source, respectively.
The Influence of Gravitational Sources on Spacetime
3.2.3. Physical Reality of the Light Speed Distribution Function c(r)
4. Connection and Complementarity with General Relativity
4.1. The Physical Essence of the Consistency of Space-Time Views Between the Two Theories
4.2. Supplementing the Dynamical Mechanism for General Relativity
4.2.1. Deficiencies in the Dynamical Mechanism of General Relativity
- Lack of dynamical mechanism: It only describes the phenomenological correlation that "spacetime curvature causes objects to move along geodesics", but does not reveal how spacetime curvature is transformed into the physical force that drives objects to accelerate, nor the dynamical process of interaction between curved spacetime and objects.
- Unclear energy source: It cannot explain the source of kinetic energy for objects accelerating in curved spacetime, nor does it clarify the conservation mechanism between gravitational field energy and the kinetic energy of object motion.
4.2.2. Supplement to the Dynamical Mechanism of General Relativity
5. The Origin of Dark Energy [20]
- Light Delay Phenomenon: Multiple astronomical observation results show that the time it takes for light emitted by distant celestial bodies to reach Earth significantly exceeds the predictions of traditional theories. Moreover, as the distance to the celestial body increases, the delay effect in light propagation time intensifies[21,22]. This phenomenon indicates that the speed of light is relatively slower in more distant regions of space.
- Superluminal Redshift Phenomenon: Astronomical observations reveal that when the observation distance exceeds 5 billion light-years, the calculated recession velocity of celestial bodies is often greater than the speed of light, which clearly contradicts the basic assumptions of relativity. According to the spacetime-light speed covariance principle, the lower the relative speed of light, the slower the time progression in that space, and the redshift of its emitted light increases accordingly. This "superluminal" phenomenon precisely illustrates that: in the redshift we observe, in addition to the contribution from the recession velocity of celestial bodies, a significant portion stems from the impact of reduced light speed (and slowed time progression)[23,24]; furthermore, the farther the distance, the greater the redshift caused by the reduction in light speed. Therefore, this abnormal redshift phenomenon indirectly proves that the farther the distance, the relatively slower the speed of light. When the observation distance exceeds approximately 14.3 billion light-years (i.e., the Hubble radius), the current recession velocity of all celestial bodies exceeds the speed of light.
- Antigravity Field and Spacetime Contraction Effect: The antigravity field originates from the inward-outward gradient of the speed of light in the universe. According to the spacetime-light speed covariance principle, during the process of decreasing light speed, spacetime undergoes corresponding contraction: the slowing of time progression causes redshift (as mentioned earlier), while spatial contraction leads to the observed size being smaller than the actual size—a conclusion supported by astronomical observations. When the speed of light approaches zero, time progression nearly stagnates, and spatial intervals contract extremely—this means that even if the universe has a boundary, it will never be reachable for us.
6. Conclusions
References
- Shapiro, I. I. (1964). Fourth Test of General Relativity. Physical Review Letters, 13(26), 789-791.
- Einstein, A. (1936). Lens-Like Action of a Star by the Deviation of Light in the Gravitational Field. Science, 84(2188), 506-507.
- Magueijo, J., & Barrow, J. D. (2002). Varying Speed of Light Theories. Physics Reports, 419(1-3), 1-50.
- Moffat, J. W. (1993). Superluminary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Initial Value Problem in Cosmology. International Journal of Modern Physics D, 2(3), 351-366.
- Feynman, R. P., Leighton, R. B., & Sands, M. (1964). The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Vol. II: Mainly Electromagnetism and Matter. Addison-Wesley.
- Goldstein, H., Poole, C., & Safko, J. (2002). Classical Mechanics (3rd Edition). Addison-Wesley.
- Landau, L. D., & Lifshitz, E. M. (1976). Mechanics (3rd Edition). Pergamon Press.
- Pound & Rebka (1960), Phys. Rev. Lett. 4, 337. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.4.337.
- Ashby (2003), Living Rev. Relativ. 6, 1. DOI: 10.12942/lrr-2003-1.
- Clemence (1947), Rev. Mod. Phys. 19, 361. DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.19.361.
- GRAVITY Collab. (2020), A&A 636, L5. DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202037813.
- Miller et al. (2019), ApJL 887, L24. DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab50c7.
- Event Horizon Telescope Collab. (2022), ApJ 930, L17. DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac6756.
- Pound, R. V., & Rebka, G. A. (1960) Physical Review Letters, 4(7), 337.
- Greenstein, J. L., et al. (1971) The Astrophysical Journal, 169, 563.
- Dyson, F. W., et al. (1920) Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 220, 291.
- Fomalont, E. B., & Kopeikin, S. M. (2003) The Astrophysical Journal, 598(1), 704.
- Shapiro, I. I. (1964) Physical Review Letters, 13(26), 789.
- Bertotti, B., et al. (2003)*Nature, 425(6956), 374-376.*.
- Perlmutter, S., et al. (1999). "Discovery of a supernova explosion at half the age of the universe." Nature, 391(6662), 51-54.
- Riess, A. G., et al. (1998) Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant Astronomical Journal, 116, 1009-1038.
- Pelmutter, S., et al. (1999) *Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae* Astrophysical Journal, 517(2), 565-586.
- Van Flandern, T. (2004). "The Top 30 Problems in Cosmology." Meta Research Bulletin, 13(4), 121-132.
- VSL Cosmology Group (2012). "A Time-Varying Speed of Light, and Other Fundamental Constants, and the Evolution of the Universe.".
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
