Submitted:
17 July 2024
Posted:
18 July 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area and Collection of the Specimens
2.2. Alpha Diversity Analysis
2.3. DNA Extraction and Barcoding
2.4. Bioinformatic Analyses
3. Results
3.1. Morphological Identification
3.2. Diversity Analysis
3.3. Barcoding
3.4. Intraspecific Diversity of Ips apache
4. Discussion
4.1. Beetle Diversity and Spatial Distribution
4.2. Predator-Prey Interactions and Ecological Relationships
4.3. Genetic Diversity and Phylogenetic Analysis
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Morris JL, C.S., Fettig CJ, DeRose RJ, Mattor K, Carter VA, et al. Bark beetles as agents of change in social-ecological systems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2018, 16, S34–S43. [CrossRef]
- FAO. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010; 978-92-5-106654-6; 2010.
- Wood, S. Bark and ambrosia beetles of South America (Coleoptera, Scolytidae). Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum: Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah., 2007.
- Hulcr J, A.T., Cognato AI, Jordal BH, McKenna DD. Morphology, Taxonomy, and Phylogenetics of Bark Beetles. In Bark Beetles, Fernando E. Vega, R.W.H., Ed. Academic Press: 2015. [CrossRef]
- Smith SM, H.J. Scolytus and other economically important bark and ambrosia beetles. In: Vega FE, Hofstetter RW (Eds) Bark Beetles: Biology and ecology of native and invasive species; Elsevier: San Diego, CA, 2015. [CrossRef]
- LR., K. Invasive bark beetles (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Scolytinae) in Chile and Argentina, Including two species new for South America, and the correct identity of the Orthotomicus Species in Chile and Argentina Diversity 2018, 10, 40. [CrossRef]
- Raffa, K.; Aukema, B.; Bentz, B.; Carroll, A.; Hicke, J.; Turner, M.; Romme, W. Cross-scale drivers of natural disturbances prone to anthropogenic amplification: the dynamics of bark beetle eruptions. Bioscience 2008, 58, 501–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grégoire JC; Jactel H; Hulcr J; Battisti A; Inward D; Petter F; F, G. Cosmopolitan Scolytinae: Strong common drivers, but too many singularities for accurate prediction. NeoBiota 2023, 84, 81-105. NeoBiota 2023, 84, 81–105. [CrossRef]
- Breshears, D.; Cobb, N.S.; Rich, P.; Price, K.; Allen, C.; Balice, R.; Romme, W.; Kastens, J.; Floyd, M.; Belnap, J. , et al. Regional vegetation die-off in response to global-change-type drought. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005, 102, 15144–15148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ryan, M.G.; Sapes, G.; Sala, A.; Hood, S.M. Tree physiology and bark beetles. New Phytol 2015, 205, 955–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Billings RF, C.S. , Mendoza VE, Cabrera PC, Figueroa BM, Campos JR, Baeza G. Bark beetle outbreaks and fire: A devastating combination for central America’s pine forests. Unasylva 2004, 55, 10–15. [Google Scholar]
- Armendáriz-Toledano, F.; Niño, A.; Sullivan, B.T.; Macías-Sámano, J.; Víctor, J.; Clarke, S.R.; Zúñiga, G. Two Species within Dendroctonus frontalis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): Evidence from Morphological, Karyological, Molecular, and Crossing Studies. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 2014, 107, 11–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gomez DF, S.S. , Hulcr J. Towards sustainable forest management in Central America: Review of southern pine beetle (Dendroctonus frontalis Zimmermann) outbreaks, their causes, and solutions. Forests 2020, 11, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hernandez, A.J.; Saborio, J.; Ramsey, R.D.; Rivera, S. Likelihood of occurrence of bark beetle attacks on conifer forests in Honduras under normal and climate change scenarios. Geocarto International 2012, 27, 581–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ICF. Anuario Estadístico Forestal de Honduras (37 ed.); ICF: Tegucigalpa, 2022.
- Rivera Rojas M, L.B. , Billings R. Climate change and outbreaks of southern pine beetle Dendroctonus frontalis in Honduras. Forest Systems 2010, 1, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valdez Vasquez MC, C.C.-F. , Yi-Jeng L, Kuo Y-C, Chen Y-Y, Medina D, Diaz K. Characterizing spatial patterns of pine bark beetle outbreaks during the dry and rainy season’s in Honduras with the aid of geographic information systems and remote sensing data. Forest Ecology and Management. [CrossRef]
- ICF. Informe de episodio de ataque del gorgojo descortezador del pino (Dendroctonus frontalis) en Honduras, 2014-2017; 2017.
- Wood, S. The bark and ambrosia beetles of North and Central America (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), a taxonomic monograph. Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs 1982, 6, 1–1356. [Google Scholar]
- Tahir, H.M.; Noor, A.; Mehmood, S.; Sherawat, S.M.; Qazi, M.A. Evaluating the accuracy of morphological identification of insect pests of rice crops using DNA barcoding. Mitochondrial DNA B Resour 2018, 3, 1220–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wu Z, L.S. , Li J, Miao S, Lu Y. Morphological and molecular identification of Xylocoris flavipes (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) in southern China. Grain & Oil Science and Technology 2021, 4, 26–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, C.; Luo, C.; Yang, R.; Yang, Y.; Guo, X.; Deng, Y.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, Y. Morphological and molecular identification reveals a high diversity of Anopheles species in the forest region of the Cambodia-Laos border. Parasit Vectors 2022, 15, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rugman-Jones, P.F.; Hoddle, M.S.; Mound, L.A.; Stouthamer, R. Molecular identification key for pest species of Scirtothrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). J Econ Entomol 2006, 99, 1813–1819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Orozco, J. Código de barras de ADN revela el primer registro de Coenosia attenuata Stein (Diptera: Muscidae) en Honduras. Ceiba 2018, 55, 70–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mejia, A.; Matamoros, G.; Fontecha, G.; Sosa-Ochoa, W. Bionomic aspects of Lutzomyia evansi and Lutzomyia longipalpis, proven vectors of Leishmania infantum in an endemic area of non-ulcerative cutaneous leishmaniasis in Honduras. Parasit Vectors 2018, 11, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Escobar, D.; Ascencio, K.; Ortiz, A.; Palma, A.; Fontecha, G. Distribution and phylogenetic diversity of Anopheles species in malaria endemic areas of Honduras in an elimination setting. Parasit Vectors 2020, 13, 333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Negrón JF, M.J. , Anhold JA, Coulson D. Bark beetle-caused mortality in a drought-affected ponderosa pine landscape in Arizona, USA. Forest Ecology and Management 2009, 257, 1353–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arnett, R.H., Thomas, M. C., Skelley, P. E., & Frank, J. H. American Beetles polyphaga: Scarabaeoidea through Curculionoidea (1 ed.). ed.; CRC Press LLC.: Boca Raton, Florida, 2002 Vol. 2.
- Douglas HB, C.A. , Grebennikov V, Savard K. Dichotomous and matrix-based keys to the Ips bark beetles of the World (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae). Canadian Journal of Arthropod Identification. 2019, 38, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chao, A. , Chiu, C.H., and Jost, L. Unifying Species Diversity, Phylogenetic Diversity, Functional Diversity, and Related Similarity and Differentiation Measures Through Hill Numbers. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 2014, 45, 297–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alberdi A, G.M. Hilldiv: an R package for the integral analysis of diversity based on Hill numbers. 2019. [CrossRef]
- Folmer, O.; Black, M.; Hoeh, W.; Lutz, R.; Vrijenhoek, R. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol 1994, 3, 294–299. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Cho S, M.A. , Mitter C, Regier J, Matthews M, Roberson R. Molecular phylogenetics of heliothine moths (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae: Heliothinae), with comments on the evolution of host range and pest status. Systematic Entomology 2008, 33, 581–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vink CJ, P.C. First record of Sitona discoideus Gyllenhal 1834 (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on Norfolk Island. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 2007, 34, 283–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simon, C.; Frati, F.; Beckenbach, A.; Crespi, B.; Liu, H.; Flook, P. Evolution, Weighting, and Phylogenetic Utility of Mitochondrial Gene Sequences and a Compilation of Conserved Polymerase Chain Reaction Primers. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 1994, 87, 651–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kearse, M.; Moir, R.; Wilson, A.; Stones-Havas, S.; Cheung, M.; Sturrock, S.; Buxton, S.; Cooper, A.; Markowitz, S.; Duran, C. , et al. Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 1647–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tajima, F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 1989, 123, 585–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Covre LS, H.R. , Flechtmann CAH. Establishment of Sinoxylon anale Lesne (Coleoptera: Bostrichi-dae) in Brazil and its potential implications. Insecta Mundi 2023, 1005, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Jordal, B.H. Cossoninae. In: Leschen R, Beutel R (Eds) Handbook of Zoology Arthropoda: Insecta: Coleoptera, Volume 3: Morphology and Systematics (Phytophaga). ; Berlin, 2014.
- Lanteri, A.A. , Guedes, J. C., & Parra, J. R. P. Weevils Injurious for Roots of Citrus in São Paulo State, Brazil. Neotropical Entomology 2002, 31, 561–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kirkendall, L.R., Biedermann, P. H. W., & Jordal, B. H. Evolution and Diversity of Bark and Ambrosia Beetles. In Bark Beetles: Biology and Ecology of Native and Invasive Species; Academic Press: 2015. [CrossRef]
- Wegensteiner, R. , Wermelinger, B., & Herrmann, M. Natural Enemies of Bark Beetles. In Bark Beetles: Biology and Ecology of Native and Invasive Species; Academic Press: 2015.
- Landi L, G.D. , Braccini CL, Pereyra VA, Smith SH, Marvaldi AE. Morphological and molecular identification of the invasive Xylosandrus crassiusculus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) and its South American range extending into Argentina and Uruguay. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 2017, 110, 344–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andrei S., I. I. Ips infestation - a global problem for coniferous in the face of climate change. Scientific Study and Research 2021, 22, 245–261. [Google Scholar]
- Gandhi KJ, H.R.B.b.m., ecology, and climate change. Academic Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/C2019-0-04282-3. Bark beetle management, ecology, and climate change; Academic Press.: 2021. [CrossRef]
- Sallé A, A.W. , Lieutier F, Stauffer C, Kerdelhué C. Phylogeography of a host-specific insect: Genetic structure of Ips typographus in Europe does not reflect past fragmentation of its host. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 2007, 90, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jones KL, S.V. , Marculis NG, Wijerathna AN, Evenden ML. Factors influencing dispersal by flight in bark beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae): from genes to landscapes. Canadian Journal of Forest 2019, 49, 1024–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, Z.M.C. , Kevin D.; Takagi, Esturo; Kees, Aubree M.; Aukema, Brian H. Colonization and reproduction of potential competitors with mountain pine beetle in baited logs of a new host for mountain pine beetle, jack pine. Forest Ecology and Management 2021, 497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wegensteiner R, W.B. , Herrmann M. Natural enemies of bark beetles: Predators, parasitoids, pathogens, and nematodes. In Bark Beetles: Biology and Ecology of Native and Invasive Species. Vega, F.E., Hofstetter, Richard W., Ed. Elsevier: London, 2015; pp. 247-304.
- Kolibáč, J. Trogossitidae: A review of the beetle family, with a catalogue and keys. Zookeys 2013. [CrossRef]
- Rifkind, J. Enoclerus hefferni, a new species of checkered beetle (Coleoptera: Cleridae: Clerinae) from Honduras, with additions to the Honduran Enoclerus Gahan fauna. Insecta Mundi 2021, 0847, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- Aukema, B.H.; Raffa, K.F. Selective manipulation of predators using pheromones: responses to frontalin and ipsdienol pheromone components of bark beetles in the Great Lakes region. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 2005, 7, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ho, B.H.; Hu, F.S.; Fikacek, M. The Dung Beetle Oxyomus of Taiwan (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae): Review of the Fauna, a New Species and its Larva Associated by DNA Barcoding. Zool Stud 2022, 61, e80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kabalak, M.; Karacaolu, A.; Blg, H.A.; Karaguzel, D.; Karaaslan, A. Comparisons of two cryptic Ampedus species (Coleoptera: Elateridae) by using classical systematics, ecological niche modeling, and DNA barcoding. Zootaxa 2022, 5154, 454–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jordal, B.H.; Kambestad, M. DNA barcoding of bark and ambrosia beetles reveals excessive NUMTs and consistent east-west divergence across Palearctic forests. Mol Ecol Resour 2014, 14, 7–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kiran, V.S.; Asokan, R.; Revannavar, R.; Hanchipura Mallesh, M.S.; Ramasamy, E. Genetic characterization and DNA barcoding of coffee shot-hole borer, Xylosandrus compactus (Eichhoff) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae). Mitochondrial DNA A DNA Mapp Seq Anal 2019, 30, 779–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cognato, A.I. Chapter 9. Biology, systematics, and evolution of Ips. In Vega FE and Hofstetter RW (eds), Bark Beetles: Biology and Ecology of Native and Invasive species.; Academic Press: New York, USA, 2015.





| Protocol | Primer name | Sequence (5´- 3´) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | LCO-1490 | GGT CAA CAA ATC ATA AAG ATA TTG G | [32] |
| HCO-2198 | TAA ACT TCA GGG TGA CCA AAA ATC A | ||
| B | BC1Fm | GTA AAA ACG ACG GCC AGT TCW AAY CAY AAR GAY ATY GG | [33] |
| HCO-2198 | |||
| C | C1-N-2650 | CCN GTR AAT ARN GGG AAT CAT TG | [34] |
| C1-J-2183 | CAA CAT TTA TTT TGA TTT TTT GG | [35] |
| N | Family | Subfamily | Genus | Ecological group [Reference] | Category | Number, (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bostrichidae | Dinoderinae | Stephanopachys | Xyl [38] | NA | 1, (0.09%) |
| 2 | Xylomeira | Xyl [38] | NA | 1, (0.09%) | ||
| 3 | Curculionidae | Cossoninae | Tomolips | ND [39] | NA | 61, (5%) |
| 4 | Stenoscelis | ND [39] | NA | 2, (0.2%) | ||
| 5 | Entiminae | Pantomorus* | RF [40] | NA | 1, (0.09%) | |
| 6 | Platypodinae | Euplatypus | Xlm [41] | Ambrosia | 35, (3%) | |
| 7 | Tesserocerus | Xlm [41] | Ambrosia | 1, (0.09%) | ||
| 8 | Scolytinae | Araptus | Phl, Spm [41] | Bark | 1, (0.09%) | |
| 9 | Cryptocarenus | Spm [41] | NA | 10, (0.9%) | ||
| 10 | Coccotrypes | Phl, Spm [41] | Bark | 1, (0.09%) | ||
| 11 | Corthylus | Xlm [41] | Ambrosia | 2, (0.2%) | ||
| 12 | Dendroctonus | Phl [41] | Bark | 4, (0.3%) | ||
| 13 | Gnathotrichus | Xlm [41] | Ambrosia | 22, (2%) | ||
| 14 | Hylastes | Phl [41] | Bark | 6, (0.5%) | ||
| 15 | Hylocurus | Phl [41] | Bark | 1, (0.09%) | ||
| 16 | Hypothenemus | Phl, Spm, Xlm [41] | Bark/Ambrosia | 24, (2%) | ||
| 17 | Ips | Phl [41] | Bark | 602, (53%) | ||
| 18 | Monarthrum | Xlm [41] | Ambrosia | 3, (0.3%) | ||
| 19 | Micracis | Xyl [41] | NA | 1, (0.09%) | ||
| 20 | Pityophthorus | Mye, Phl | Bark | 16, (1.4%) | ||
| 21 | Taurodemus | Xlm [41] | Ambrosia | 1, (0.09%) | ||
| 22 | Xyleborinus | Xlm [41] | Ambrosia | 14, (1.2%) | ||
| 23 | Xyleborus | Xlm [41] | Ambrosia | 187, (16.5%) | ||
| 24 | Cleridae | Clerinae | Enoclerus | Pred [42] | Predator | 21, (1.8%) |
| 25 | Tilinae | Cymatodera | Pred [42] | Predator | 1, (0.09%) | |
| 26 | Trogossitidae | Trogossitinae | Temnoscheila | Pred [42] | Predator | 111, (10%) |
| 27 | Tenebroides | Pred [42] | Predator | 1, (0.09%) | ||
| Total | 1131, (100%) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).