Plant-Soil Microbial Interaction: Differential Adaptations of Beneficial vs. Pathogenic Bacterial and Fungal Communities to Climate-Induced Drought and Desiccation Stresses

1. Introduction

Soil is an important living ecosystem that supports all forms of terrestrial life [1]. In one g of soil, there are thousands of microbial taxa: viruses, bacteria, archaea, protists, and fungi, which form stable microbial communities that participate in nutrient cycling, transformation of organic matter, modification of biochemical and biophysical properties of soil, bioaccumulation of inorganic compounds, bioremediation of contaminated soils, and other activities or functions? [2]. The escalating prevalence of climate-induced drought and desiccation poses formidable challenges to soil microbiomes and the intricate ecosystems they support. The remarkable diversity of microbial communities within soil ecosystems is fundamental to the sustainable functioning of soil ecosystems, thereby facilitating efficient plant growth, development, and ultimately, crop yields [3]. Within these microbial communities, interactions among members manifest in diverse forms, including mutualism, competition, antagonism, commensalism, amensalism, or neutralism [4]. Moreover, their distribution within the soil volume is heterogeneous; notably, around plant roots in the rhizosphere, microbial cell concentrations, particularly comprising rhizobacteria and mycorrhizal fungi, exhibit significantly higher densities [5]. This heightened presence of rhizosphere microorganisms around plant roots plays a pivotal role in assisting plants to withstand various biotic and abiotic stresses, including diseases and drought.

Mankind is accustomed to the idea that drought is a common natural phenomenon that occurs periodically in almost all climatic zones. There are many places on Earth where water availability is limited and in the absence of precipitation for several weeks there is a so-called meteorological drought, and for a longer period - agricultural drought is associated with crop losses [6]. According to various estimates, arid regions occupy between 26.3% and 36.3% of the land area, occurring on all seven continents [7, 8]. In these regions, not only plants but also soil microorganisms face the possibility of desiccation during which the water content of cells can decrease to 0.1 g H₂O g-1 dry mass, corresponding to no free water in the cytoplasm [9].

The projected climate change towards an increase in the average daily temperature on the planet by several degrees, will inevitably lead to an increase in the area of drylands and will negatively affect agriculture [10]. In this situation, it is particularly important to study the effects of drought and desiccation stress on soil microorganisms, both plant beneficials and pathogens, as well as on their relationships within microbial communities, and interactions with plants. Physiological, structural and genetic adaptation mechanisms of soil microorganisms allow them to adapt and survive under unfavorable drought conditions [11]. Microorganisms detect the slightest changes in environmental parameters, which are signals for them to act, and quickly respond by regulating the expression of their genes [12]. However, the adaptive responses of pathogenic and beneficial soil microbes during drought are different.

Prokaryotic bacteria, eukaryotic fungi and oomycetes are common members of soil-borne plant pathogen communities and can survive for many years in the absence of host plants [13]. However, we have little understanding of how drought affects the survival and reproduction of pathogenic microorganisms. Pathogens are known to survive the abiotic stress of drought in different ways. Some representatives increase their pathogenic activity in wet conditions and reduce it in dry soils, while others, on the contrary, are active during dry periods [14]. To cope with drought, all pathogens develop their adaptation strategies associated with the formation of a large number of stable structures e.g., microsclerotia, sclerotia, chlamydospores, and oospores, the production of pathogenicity factors, and a wide range of enzymes.

In most soils, there is a certain level of pathogen suppression (general soil suppression) due to competitive interactions between antagonist microorganisms [15]. Therefore, under normal conditions, plant infection is inhibited in soils [16]. Plant disease outcome depends on complex ecological interactions and communications between plants and pathogens, between plant microbiomes and pathogens, and between plants and their microbiomes [17]. The plant microbiome controls pathogens through a range of mechanisms including modulation of immune responses, competition with pathogens for resources and space, production of antifungal effectors, lytic enzymes and secondary metabolites (antibiotics, bacteriocins, toxins and siderophores) [18]. However, abiotic factors such as drought led to a reduced immune response of agricultural plants, making them less resistant to attack by soil pathogens [13]. In this situation, plants are assisted by beneficial soil microorganisms inhabiting the rhizosphere region - rhizobacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. In addition to protecting microbial cells during drought due to changes in cell wall structure, production of protective substances, etc., they help plants to survive dry periods through numerous mechanisms [11, 19,20]. Despite the large amount of information accumulated in this field, some aspects of it are poorly understood. Many specific mechanisms of communication molecules in complex ecological interactions between plants and all members of the microbiome under drought conditions remain unclear [17].

New data on the survival mechanisms of rhizobacteria and AMF during drought are constantly emerging, but there has been no comparative analysis of these mechanisms. Also lacking is a comparison of adaptive drought survival mechanisms in beneficial and pathogenic soil microorganisms, which will help to provide new insights into sustainable agronomy. This paper addresses several critical aspects: (1) Investigating the complex interactions between plant roots and soil microbes under climate-induced drought and desiccation stresses, (2) Analyzing the distinct adaptive strategies of plant pathogenic and mutualistic bacterial and fungal communities in response to drought, (3) Examining how soil microbiomes mediate plant defence mechanism under drought and desiccation stresses, and (4) Exploring the role of horizontal gene transfer in the adaptation of both pathogenic and non-pathogenic microbes to drought stress.

2. Complex Interplay between Plant Roots and Soil Microbes under Drought and Desiccation Stresses

2.1. Microbial Community Structure Affected by Drought

As climate change escalates, marked by phenomena like drought and desiccation primarily caused by water deficits, the intricate dynamics within soil microbiomes are experiencing significant shifts. Scientists have long studied the effects of these phenomena on natural ecosystems, and most often on soil microbiota, as it is directly related to crop drought tolerance in particular and successful agronomy in general [21]. And currently, with global warming threatening to transform ecosystems, interest in this issue is increasing [22]. Scientists still do not know the answer to the question of which has a greater impact on soil processes and microbial activity: the drying process or subsequent moistening [23]. It is also unknown what the long-term effects on microbial communities will be from changing climatic conditions [24].

Notable progress has been made in the understanding of the influence of dry periods on the number and composition of soil microbial communities and their interactions with plants [22,25]. Increasing aridity has been shown to reduce soil microbial diversity and abundance [26], as well as microbial community structure and function [27]. It has also been noted in many studies that in most cases, it is not the drought period itself, but the constant change in drought-wetting regimes that has a greater impact on the microbial soil community [22,27].

Microbial cells must adapt when soils dry out, and reduce energy consumption, synthesize osmoprotectants (trehalose, glycine-betaene, amino compounds, etc.), structurally change the composition of phospholipids and fatty acids of the cell membrane, etc. [28]. In doing so, those species, and even strains that can do it better, will dominate the communities subjected to desiccation [29]. Most studies point to the advantages of gram-positive bacteria (apparently due to a thick layer of cell wall peptidoglycan) and their increase during drought periods in both soil and plant rhizosphere [30]. For example, Polish scientists showed that drought and rewetting stress changed the structure of the soil bacterial community in favor of Gram-positive bacteria of taxonomic categories Actinobacteria and Firmicutes, while the relative abundance of Gram-negative bacteria in most cases decreased, especially affecting representatives of Gammaproteobacteria and Bacteroidetes [31]. A study of Australian soil communities showed that during prolonged drought, an increase in the relative abundance of microorganisms belonging to oligotrophic taxa such as Actinobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria, Planctomycetes, Ascomycota and Basidiomycota occurred [32]. Whereas in wet periods, very different taxa such as Acidobacteria, TM7, Gemmatimonadates and Chytridiomycota dominated [32]. During dry periods, soils of Austrian mountain meadows were also dominated by specialized members of Actinobacteriota, especially of the genus Streptomyces. [33]. At the same time, >90% of bacterial and archaeal taxa stopped dividing altogether or divided at significantly reduced growth rates [33]. Water limitation during drought and the associated increase in soil C/N ratio in Swiss forest soils promoted the spread of desiccation-tolerant oligotrophic taxa and caused a shift in the potential lifestyle of microorganisms from symbiotic to saprotrophic [34]. Sometimes, scientists observed unusual facts, for example, in the soils of the hyper-arid Atacama Desert on the west coast of South America (territory of Chile), one of the most life-hostile habitats on the planet, evidence of a metabolically active community of archaea was found during periods of wetting [35]. In a study by Chilakala et al. a drought-induced increase in phototroph populations in both the soil and root microbiome was observed [36]. This indicates the complex ways in which drought affects microbial composition and dynamics in the plant-soil system [37].

Metagenomic studies by Chilakala et al. showed that in the rhizosphere zone, drought enhances the fungal microbiota by suppressing virus and algal populations [36]. In addition, prokaryotic communities were found to be less resistant to water limitation than fungal communities in most other studies [34]. Compared to bacteria, fungi have unique survival skills and physiological structures that enhance their drought tolerance [38]. However, in some cases, the opposite situation was also observed, apparently related to the predominance of drought-tolerant bacterial species such as Pseudomonas spp. and Bacillus spp. in the soil microbiome. These bacteria appeared to adapt to dehydration through their ability to form biofilms, produce stress-sensitive proteins, and utilize diverse nutrient sources even under challenging conditions [39].

The adaptive response of the soil microbiome to drought is affected not only by the lack of moisture but also by other parameters: soil composition (nitrogen and carbon content and ratio), pH, presence of heavy metals, etc. [2,39]. Dehydration stress has been shown to affect microorganisms more strongly in soils with low organic matter content [40]. Ambient air temperature and atmospheric CO₂ content are also relevant [41]. For example, Metze et al. experimentally modelled what would happen to the soil microbial community under drought conditions during a six-year climate warming period involving a 3 °C increase in temperature and a 300-ppm increase in atmospheric CO₂ concentration [33]. It was demonstrated that in this scenario, there would be a 2.3-fold increase in the number of taxa undergoing active division (from 4% to 9%, compared to 35% under normal conditions), indicating the adaptation of numerous species to adverse conditions.

Plants and multicellular fungi can regulate the composition of the bacterial community of the rhizosphere by root exudation of various substances into the soil during drought [42, 43]. For example, it was shown that the cactus Echinocactus platyacanthus in Mexico during drought periods changes the profile of amino acids secreted by its roots, which in turn restructures the microbial community in its rhizosphere in favor of bacteria belonging to the type Armatimonadota, classes Actinobacteria and Dehalococcoidia, families Gemmataceae and Nitrosococcaceae [44]. The fungi Rhizophagus and Serendipita have a protective effect on the bacterial communities of their hyphosphere, which are subject to water limitation [45].

Soil microorganisms can increase plant resistance to drought through the production of substances (polysaccharides, indoleacetic acid, proline, etc.) that improve soil structure and its water-holding capacity [46]. However, their effect is insufficient during prolonged periods of dehydration, which is especially evident in the yield reduction of legume crops dependent on nitrogen fixation processes associated rhizobacteria [47]. Drying severely limits atmospheric nitrogen fixation by these bacteria and results in yield loss [48]. In this case, additional inoculation of plant roots with different species of rhizobacteria belonging to the genera Pseudomonas, Bacillus, Rhizobium, Enterobacter, Azospirillum, Azotobacter, Arthrobacter, Mesorhizobium, Xanthomonas, Acinetobacter, Alcaligenes, Burkholderia, Erwinia and Flavobacterium help plants cope with the effects of drought by enhancing their growth, root elongation, production or inhibition of phytohormones, and production of volatile organic compounds [49].

Currently, drought stands out as one of the most perilous abiotic stresses affecting soil microorganisms, diminishing their activity and population while disrupting community composition. The adverse impacts of drought on soil microbiota result in decreased soil fertility and crop productivity. With the anticipation of more frequent droughts due to climate warming, research on innovative strategies to enhance the drought tolerance of microorganisms, thereby aiding plants, is of paramount importance. Mechanisms enabling microbes to endure and proliferate amidst diminishing moisture levels could introduce new functional groups into the ecosystem, offering substantial advantages to agriculture [43].

2.2. Rhizobacteria-Plants Interactions Affected by Drought

The rhizosphere, a small zone around roots influenced by exudates and root secretions, contains 10-100 times more microorganisms than the rest of the soil (over 1000 1011 microbial cells per gram of root) [5,50]. These are mainly rhizobacteria, of which there are more than 30,000 species [50], and mycorrhizal fungi (mainly arbuscular fungi (AMF), about 250 species [51], which are obligate symbionts of 70-90% of plant species [52]. Rhizobacteria and mycorrhizal fungi inhabit root tissue as endophytes or on the surface of plant roots (rhizoplane) and represent an important part of the soil microbiota [53]. Microorganisms participate in biological nitrogen fixation, convert high molecular weight soil organic polymers into organic, inorganic and amino acids, sugars, vitamins, purines, nucleosides, etc., produce phytohormones, redistribute the flow of nutrients throughout the soil-plant system, which helps plant growth [54]. Also, rhizobial microorganisms exert biocontrol and increase plant resistance to biotic (pathogens) and abiotic (drought) stresses. [55,56]. In addition, they participate in other biophysical and biochemical soil processes of ecological importance and interact with the rest of the soil microbiota [57,58]. This group of microorganisms is very important in terms of efficient agronomy (confined agriculture without chemicals).

The response of rhizobia microorganisms to desiccation stress began to be studied about 100 years ago. This was due to their use as seed inoculum in agriculture [59]. At the same time, the attention of scientists was directed to investigate the effects of growth medium, pH and temperature on the survival of cells in the dry state and to study the conditions for the effective use of dry cell preparations in agronomy [60]. The increasing need for the use of inoculants in agriculture has led to the discovery of a large number of soil microorganisms (bacteria and fungi) that somehow contribute to plant growth and stress tolerance [61]. Particular attention has been focused on rhizosphere-dwelling bacteria, which in the late 1970s came to be called “plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria” or PGPR for short [62]. This group of bacteria includes several genera such as Pseudomonas, Enterobacter, Bacillus, Variovax, Klebsiella, Paraburkholderia, Azospirillum, Herbaspirillum, Gluconacetobacter, Serratia, Azotobacter and others. They are widely distributed in soils throughout the globe, phylogenetically diverse and often not species-specific to the host plant [54,63]. Among rhizobial microorganisms, it is the bacteria that are believed to play a crucial role in helping the host plant under drought conditions [64]. Whereas, in the case of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), their dependence on host plants and susceptibility to changes in water availability may limit their protective potential during drought periods [65].

The number of studies on the effects of drought on rhizobial microorganisms is steadily increasing [66]. Rhizobacteria and AMF have been shown to have biochemical and physiological defence mechanisms that are activated during periods of drought and allow them not only to cope with its effects but also to protect the host plant [67,68]. Microbiomes have been found to make critical contributions to plant adaptation and induce plant adaptability to combined biotic (pathogens) and abiotic (drought) stresses, especially in arid climates [69,70].

3. Adaptive Strategies Employed by Pathogenic and Beneficial Microbes under Drought

3.1. Adaptive Mechanisms of Rhizobacteria under Drought

Adaptive strategies of rhizobacteria in response to climatic stressors include cellular, genetic and enzymatic changes. Under drought conditions, changes in the cellular structure and metabolic activity of rhizobacteria are observed, affecting their survival and function under water-limited conditions [71,72]. Moreover, the main mechanism that allows rhizobacteria to survive under stress conditions is the alteration of gene expression toward the synthesis of protective substances such as trehalose, proline, glycine-betaine, glutamate, mannitol, hydroxylation, exopolysaccharides, heat shock proteins, and proteins involved in cell membrane protection, DNA damage repair, and response to oxidative stress [73]. A metagenomic study by Bulgarelli et al. identified specific genes involved in mechanisms of responses to various abiotic stresses? [74].

Cytryn et al. showed that desiccation of cells of Bradyrhizobium japonicum, a gram-negative soil bacterium that converts atmospheric nitrogen to ammonia by forming a symbiotic association through soybean root nodules, results in differential expression of 15 to 20% of 8453 genes within 3 days [75]. The induction of trehalose-6-phosphate synthase (otsA), trehalose-6-phosphate phosphatase (otsB), and trehalose synthase (treS) genes, which encode two of the three trehalose synthesis pathways, is more than 2-fold increased, correlating with an increase in its intracellular concentration. The authors also showed that the expression of genes encoding isocitrate lyase, responses to oxidative stress, exopolysaccharide synthesis and transport, heat shock proteins, enzymes for nucleic acid modification and repair, and the synthesis of pili and flagella increased under desiccation conditions [75]. Zhu et al. also demonstrated that different types of genes are differentially expressed in Bradyrhizobium japonicum cells during drought at10% relative humidity and subsequent rehydration. [76]. Significant activation of genes of trehalose biosynthesis (otsAB, treS and treYZ), ligD, oprB and sigma factor rpoH, as well as genes involved in signal transduction and transport of inorganic ions was observed [76].

The accumulation of trehalose in cells in response to desiccation stress appears to be a universal mechanism of both rhizobacteria and other soil bacteria [76-78]. Trehalose accumulation in the cytoplasm rather than in the periplasmic space was found to be more important for cell survival during dehydration. Also, the chances of bacterial survival increase when trehalose is added to the medium [78]. Double mutants of otsA treY, which cannot accumulate trehalose, are more sensitive to the effects of desiccation and are also less competitive for nodule occupancy [79].

Trehalose is a non-reducing disaccharide (α- D -glucopyranosyl-1 and 1-α- D -glucopyranoside) containing two α-glucose molecules. The involvement of trehalose in cellular defence against stress is attributed to its stable structure: the low energy (1 kcal/mol) of the glycosidic bond connecting the two hexose rings [80]; and several unique physical properties: high hydrophilicity and chemical stability, non-hygroscopic glass formation, and lack of internal hydrogen bond formation [81]. There are three mutually exclusive mechanisms of biomolecule protection during drying with the participation of trehalose: 1) substitution of water molecules by trehalose molecules in the hydrate layer of biopolymers to stabilize their structure and prevent denaturation; 2) the formation by trehalose of amorphous, non-hygroscopic crystals causing a vitreous effect in the cell, which helps to keep all biopolymers intact for a long time; 3) the interaction of a very flexible glycosidic bond between two D -glucose residues of trehalose with the polar groups of various biomacromolecules, ensuring their chemical stability [80,81]. These mechanisms play a vital role in the survival of rhizobia under both free-living and symbiosis conditions and also help plants mitigating abiotic and biotic stresses [82].

3.2. Sensitivity of Rhizobacterial Species to Desiccation

Rhizobacteria tolerate full or partial desiccation stress in different ways [83]. In experiments where aliquots of PGPR bacterial suspensions were subjected to drying under different conditions to a certain humidity or complete drying and then re-watered, the titer of surviving cells varied greatly [84]. For example, after complete drying and then re-watering, (3.23 %±0.2 %) cells of Acinetobacter Calcoaceticus strain PADD68; (1.5 %±0.41 %) Arthrobacter phenanthrenivorans DSM 18606T and (31.58 %±6.9 %) Arthrobacter siccitolerans 4J27T [85] remained viable. Two strains of Bradyrhizobium japonicum, TXVA and TXEA, isolated from soybean root nodules in Texas showed (87.1% ± 0.61%) and (93.9% ± 0.63%) survival rates, respectively, under 27% relative humidity conditions, while their counterpart, the wild-type strain B. japonicum USDA110, was also very resistant to desiccation, with 80.00% ± 0.98% of cells surviving the experiments [86]. Some PGPRs are particularly sensitive to desiccation. For example, the titer of viable Pseudomonas putida KT2440T cells was not detected at all after undergoing desiccation stress [83,84]. Although, there is a suggestion that this may be due, not to the death of all cells, but their transition to a non-culturable state, which is one of the defense mechanisms against this type of stress [87]. For example, an experiment with PGPR Bradyrhizobium japonicum 5038 used fluorescent staining of stressed cells with Live/Dead cry-site and showed that several viable but unculturable cells were present in the culture medium after drying and rehydration [76]. The authors [88] analyzed 28 strains of rhizosphere bacteria able to withstand 18 days of air-drying stress (at 30°C and 50% relative humidity) and proposed to divide all rhizobacteria into 5 categories: highly tolerant, tolerant, medium tolerant, low tolerant and very low tolerant. In doing so, they showed that under desiccation conditions, only the highly tolerant strains could adhere to maize seeds, colonize its rhizosphere and stimulate plant growth. However, bacterial strains with low tolerance levels, unlike highly tolerant strains, were unable to do so [88]. A lot of work has to be done to isolate drought-resistant strains with beneficial properties. For example, Indian researchers analyzed 164 isolates of rhizobacteria, out of which only five of them belonging to Enterobacter cloacae, Bacillus cereus and Bacillus megaterium showed resistance to desiccation and yet were able to stimulate the growth performance of wheat during drought under desiccation stress [89].

3.3. Adaptive Mechanisms of AMFs under Drought

AMFs have been able to develop adaptive mechanisms and adjust to drought conditions, primarily by producing more spores [90,91]. However, water deficit affects the growth and development of AMF, which is manifested by reduced growth of extra-radical hyphae, and reduced ability to colonize plant roots, and to carry out the sporulation process [92]. All this leads to a decrease in the ability of AMF to form symbiotic associations with plant roots, which disturbs the balance of the soil microbiome [93]. Moreover, under dry conditions, the total abundance of all native AMF species in plant roots decreased, leading to a reduction in the amount of extraradical mycelium and a partial decrease in plant biomass [94]. In contrast, conventional flooding or excess water depressed AMF colonization in rice roots [95]. This indicates that extreme water regimes can significantly alter the structure of a native AMF assemblage, consequently impacting the entire symbiotic mycorrhizal relationship [94-95].

Adaptive responses of AMF to dehydration and drought stress occur at cellular, genetic, and enzymatic levels (Figure 1). Cellular adaptations in response to drought include changes in hyphal morphology and spore production, as well as adjustments in aquaporin expression to regulate water uptake [96,97]. At the genetic level (based on transcriptome analyses), drought exposure causes significant shifts in stress gene expression [98]. During dry periods, there are strategic changes in the activity of key enzymes: phosphatases (involved in enhanced mobilization of phosphate) and nitrogenases (contribute to improved nitrogen assimilation) [99]. Also, AMF cells show increased activity of antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase and peroxidase, which play a vital role in mitigating oxidative stress [100]. This generalized response of AMPs at cellular, genetic and enzymatic levels highlights their adaptability to adverse environmental conditions.

3.4. Alteration of Taxonomic Structure of AMFs under Drought

Drought and water stress significantly affect AMF, which live within and on the root surfaces of most terrestrial plants [101]. Many AMF species are believed to be widespread as they are quite resistant to any abiotic influences and can tolerate drought stress well [102]. However, the direct effects of abiotic stress, including drought, on AMF remain poorly understood [90]. Few studies have reported that mycorrhizal fungi respond to abiotic stress by reducing abundance and species biodiversity [91]. It has been shown that AMF content is lower in arid soils than in soils with normal moisture content, with representatives of the family Glomeraceae being the most common [103]. Within this family, different genera and species respond to water stresses in unique ways, affecting plant health and ecosystem function. For example, Augé et al. in 2015 identified significant changes in taxonomic diversity and community structure of the genus Glomus spp. in response to drought, emphasizing the sensitivity of symbiotic associations of these AMFs to environmental stress [104]. Similar studies of AMF communities in Mediterranean ecosystems by Veresoglou et al. showed changes in the taxonomic composition of Funneliformis spp. and other AMF genera in response to water stress [105]. Somewhat adaptive responses to drought stress have been shown for the genera Diversispora spp. [106], Rhizophagus spp. Archaeospora and Paraglomus [107]. In Lozano et al. the effect of drought stress on fungi belonging to the Basidiomycota and Ascomycota was noted. The relative abundance of Basidiomycota representatives decreased and Ascomycota representatives increased, presumably due to the formation of ascospores adapted to the drought environment [108].

Each study emphasizes the flexibility of AMF communities in adapting to water stress and discusses the potential effects of drought on plant-mycorrhizal associations under changing climatic conditions. Changes in AMF communities, especially those involved in nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) cycling, can negatively affect other beneficial microbial taxa, which may ultimately lead to the degradation of some ecosystems.

3.5. Distinct Adaptation Strategies in Rhizobacteria and AMFs to Drought

Rhizobia bacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) exhibit active resistance to drought through evolutionary adaptive mechanisms involving cellular, genetic, and enzymatic alterations (Figure 1). These strategies in rhizobacteria and AMF share several similarities. For instance, when moisture levels in the environment decrease, both bacterial and fungal cells undergo transformation in cellular structure and metabolic activity primarily through changes in gene expression, while effectively regulating the osmotic state of cells. Rhizobacterial cells actively produce desiccation-resistant compounds, primarily osmolytes, while fungal cells exhibit strategic changes in the activity of key enzymes such as phosphatases, nitrogenases, superoxide dismutase, and peroxidases, along with active secretion of enzymes into the external environment. The formation of stable cellular structures is another common mechanism observed in both bacteria and fungi. Under severe drought conditions, bacteria can slow down cell metabolism and enter a dormant state, forming dormant cellular forms, whereas fungi produce drought-resistant cells with thicker cell walls, such as sclerotia.

A third important mechanism observed during drought, shared by rhizobacteria and AMF, involves increased interactions with plant roots to establish symbiotic relationships. Bacteria utilize biofilm-forming mechanisms, aiding their survival outside of symbiotic relationships, while fungi incorporate processes of considerable hyphae outgrowth to better colonize roots. Thus, both rhizobacteria and AMF, through active adaptation to drought, not only protect themselves but also assist plants in survival, especially when acting in concert.

3.6. Distinct Adaptive Strategies of Pathogenic and Beneficial Microbes to Drought

Pathogens, as well as mutualistic microorganisms, defend themselves against drought stress, with most of their adaptive mechanisms overlapping (Figure 2). One of the main defense mechanisms of pathogenic fungi and bacteria during drought and other unfavorable conditions, as well as AMF and some spore-forming species of rhizobacteria, is the formation of large amounts of stable structures, in the form of which they can persist in the soil for a very long time. For example, the main crop pathogens of fungi (belonging to the genera Fusarium or Verticillium) and oomycetes form stable structures: microsclerotia, sclerotia, chlamydospores, oospores, etc., to survive in arid conditions. [14].

Like mutualistic microorganisms, pathogens produce osmoprotectants such as proline, glycine-betaene, and other amino acids in their cells when water is scarce during drought, for example, as the oomycete Phytophthora infestans does [111]. In a study by El-Abyad et al. it was shown that the sugar beet root rot pathogens Fusarium solani and Sclerotium rolfsii under stress conditions produce alanine, proline and histidine, which play an important role in the osmoregulation of their cells [112]. In response to the changing osmotic conditions that accompany drought, pathogens not only produce osmoprotectants but also trigger other osmosensing mechanisms that help them survive. A study by Rossier and Vorhölter [113] showed how this occurs in the pathogenic bacterium Xanthomonas campestris, which causes a multitude of diseases in monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous crops worldwide [113]. The same signal transduction cascades under osmotic stress conditions are also triggered in mutualistic soil microbes such as Bacillus subtilis [114].

3.7. Adaptation of Phytopathogenic Fungi and Bacteria to Drought

Seventy to 80% of plant diseases resulting in enormous losses in agriculture are caused by pathogenic fungi belonging to the genera Alternaria, Aspergillus, Botrytis, Cladosporium, Verticillium, Pythium, Fusarium and Rhizoctonia [115]. Several hundred species of bacteria belonging to the Proteobacteria, Mollicutes and Actinomycetes are also plant pathogens. Entering the plant through natural openings such as stomata and lenticels, or wounds, the bacteria cause necrosis, maceration of tissues, wilting and hyperplasia [116].

During drought, the spread of pathogens increases and the likelihood of plant infection and disease severity increases. Modeling coupled with experimental data has shown that the prevalence of major soil fungal pathogens belonging to the genera Alternaria, Fusarium, Venturia, and Phoma is likely to increase under projected global warming [117]. However, phytopathogenic bacteria and fungi, as well as beneficial ones, tolerate drought in different ways. For some, drought is an additional factor that promotes their activity, while for others, reduced moisture becomes a hardship and they reduce their pathogenic claims on plants [118]. For example, chickpea production worldwide is significantly constrained by a disease called dry root rot (DRR) caused by the phytopathogenic fungus Macrophomina phaseolina. Studies conducted by multiple groups of scientists have shown that drought and high temperatures exacerbate the impact of pathogens on various crop plants, including chickpea [119,120]. These pathogens encompass pea root rot (Aphanomyces euteiches), white rot of onion (Sclerotium cepivorum), wheat spot (Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici), wheat crown rot (Fusarium spp.), black foot of Brassica (Leptosphaeria maculans), and black foot of grape (Ilyonectria/Dactylonectria spp.) [118]. Botryosphaeria doithidea becomes more active during dry periods, colonizing the above-ground parts of host plants through wounds and causing sores (lesions?) on a wide variety of tree and shrub species [14]. And climate change is projected to contribute to more frequent and intense outbreaks of diseases caused by Botryosphaeria dothidea as well as Neofusicoccum parvum due to their expanding range [121]. Also, according to a global study by Guerra, C. and colleagues, increased drought will favor the spread of soil fungi Penicillium spp. that cause fruit and vegetable spoilage.

On the other hand, soil pathogens belonging to the taxa Oomycota, Phytophthora spp. and Pythium spp. are more sensitive to drought and their distribution will decrease during dry periods [122]. For example, Phytophthora, which destroys the fine root system of plants, has been shown to increase its pathogenic activity in wet conditions and decrease in dry soils. Drought has also been found to alleviate the severity of sclerotinia rot of kiwifruit (S. sclerotiorum) and red needle leaf blight of radiata pine (Phytophthora pluvialis) [118]. In dry periods, the activity of the bacterial pathogen Xylella fastidiosa, which affects grapevines, also decreases. During drought, necrotrophic pathogens will be more active, depleting plant resources through regeneration and compartmentalization processes. In contrast, diseases caused by biotrophic pathogens will be less severe due to the close correlation between pathogen effectiveness and plant nutritional status, but only until the plant is on the verge of destruction [123].

4. Soil Microbiomes Mediate Plant Defence Mechanism under Drought and Desiccation Stresses

4.1. Rhizobacteria-Mediated Plant Defense Mechanisms under Drought Conditions

In soil, the relationship between rhizobia and plants is crucial for the maintenance of plant productivity. Therefore, the main objective of effective agronomy - to increase plant resistance to various types of stresses, including drought - has been successfully addressed by the application of rhizobacteria and AMF [124]. Recently, researchers have focused their attention on the unique abilities of rhizobacteria [125], mycorrhizal fungi [90,126,127] or their compositions [68,128] to help plants overcome various abiotic and biotic stresses.

PGPR induces immunity to abiotic stresses in plants, which is called induced systemic tolerance (IST) [129]. In addition, through physicochemical modifications, rhizobacteria induce increased plant resistance to drought, which is termed rhizobacterial-induced drought tolerance and resistance (RIDER) [125,130]. Numerous studies have demonstrated how PGPRs help crops combat drought and other types of abiotic stress by positively affecting growth, yield, and nutrient uptake [125,131,132]. Rubin et al. (2017), conducted a meta-analysis of 52 publications on the effects of rhizobacteria (mainly Pseudomonas, Azospirillum, Azotobacter and Bacillus) on plant growth (mainly maize, wheat, sunflower and lettuce) [67]. The authors systematized the data and summarized that under standard moisture conditions, rhizobacteria contributed 35%, 28% and 19% to the increase in root weight, shoot weight and seed yield, respectively, whereas under drought conditions rhizobacteria contributed 43%, 45% and 40%, respectively [67]. Recently, research in this area has continued with even greater intensity. To effectively help crops to cope with drought, researchers propose the use of increasingly effective PGPR strains [133] or combinations of bacterial cultures [131,134] as well as mixed combinations of rhizobacteria with mycorrhizal fungi [134,135]. Attention is also paid to selecting the stage of plant development at which the application of rhizobacteria will be most effective [136]. The most interesting works are those in which researchers propose to apply a combination of rhizobacteria and various additives: fertilizers, metabolites, hormones, nanoparticles, etc. to help plants during drought. For example, Khan showed that the combined application of rhizobial cultures Planomicrobium chinense and Bacillus cereus and the plant growth hormone, salicylic acid, effectively mitigates the adverse effects of water stress on wheat by increasing protein, sugar and chlorophyll content in leaves [137]. The same positive synergism increasing yield and physiological parameters of wheat under drought conditions was observed with rhizobacteria and cytokinins applied at different stages of plant development (tillering, flowering, grain filling) [138]. Muhammad et al. showed that the combined application of rhizobacteria Azospirillum brasilense and ZnO nanoparticles (NP) has a synergistic effect on wheat, providing growth stimulation, reducing drought stress and increasing yield [139].

There is no single mechanism by which rhizobacteria protect plants from desiccation stress. Typically, PGPBs use a wide range of adaptive measures that may vary depending on the species and strain of rhizobacteria [140]. According to the type of effects on plants, they can be divided into direct and indirect, and according to the organizational level at which changes occur, into physical, molecular and biochemical [141]. Thus, direct mechanisms (and at the same time biochemical) include how PGPR directly affects plants during drought: enhancing nitrogen fixation; inducing the production of abscisic acid, which leads to the partial closure of the stomata and reduces water evaporation through transpiration; influencing the levels of phytohormones (auxins, gibberellins and cytokinins); influencing the production of antioxidants to reduce reactive oxygen species (ROS) [142]; effects on increasing the production of osmolytes, carbohydrates, amino acids, polyamines and volatile organic compounds [143]; production of ACC deaminase, which reduces the concentration of ethylene (a plant hormone responsible for slowing down root and shoot growth under drought conditions) in plants by cleaving its precursor, which supports normal plant growth [144]; and others. The study of these mechanisms has been systematized in detail in numerous reviews published in recent years [125,145].

Indirect mechanisms may include PGPR-mediated actions that also contribute to plant survival during drought. For example, increasing the availability of soil nutrients and minerals by solubilizing phosphate or producing siderophores that help iron uptake [146]. Also, indirect methods include preventing the harmful effects of phytopathogens by producing PGPR antibiotics, antagonistic substances (phenazine, diacetylphloroglucinol, hydrogen cyanide, 2-3-butanediol, acetoin), siderophores, lytic enzymes (chitinase and glucanase that destroy the cell wall of fungal pathogens) [147,148]. Molecular mechanisms are related to the effect of rhizobacteria on plant gene expression [149]. For example, it was shown that PGPR inoculation caused up-regulation of drought stress-related genes (early dehydration response genes, heat shock proteins, various enzymes, etc.) in wheat, pepper, mungbean and Arabidopsis [150]. Physical mechanisms include the ability of PGPR to produce exopolysaccharides in the soil, which fulfill several functions [145]. On the one hand, oligo- and polysaccharides are absorbed by the surface of soil particles, and through cationic, hydrogen and Van der Waals interactions with soil chemical compounds, increase its stability and moisture retention capacity [151]. The water-holding capacity of such exometabolism can reach seventy grams of water per gram of polysaccharide [152]. On the other hand, EPSs promote the formation of hydrophilic biofilms (in the form of capsules) on the surface of plant roots, further protecting them from drying [153,154].

4.2. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungal-Mediated Plant Defense Mechanisms under Drought

AMFs significantly increase host plant resistance to abiotic and biotic stresses [155,156], especially, as previously mentioned, they are symbionts with most terrestrial plants [157]. They manage to do so thanks to the developed network of their mycelium, the production of glomalin [158], as well as a number of other mechanisms acting at three levels: physiological, morphological and molecular [159]. Studies investigating the phenomenon and mechanisms of AMF-mediated enhancement of plant resistance during drought are plentiful and interest continues to grow [126,160]. Yu Wang [159] analyzed the publication activity over several years on this issue. The authors write that in 2011 there were 27 articles related to this topic, in 2021 there are already 124 articles, and in 2022 there are 131 articles, with the focus increasingly shifting to studying the molecular mechanisms that explain how arbuscular mycorrhizae enhance plant tolerance to drought [159].

AMFs alter host plant physiology under drought conditions: they adjust water potential and gas exchange, increase water and nutrient uptake, and improve stomatal regulation [92,161,162]. AM extraradical hyphae can create shared mycorrhizal networks between neighboring plants, helping to transmit signals and exchange nutrients [160]. At the biochemical level, AMFs modulate levels of hormones (such as strigolactones, jasmonic acid, abscisic acid, etc.), activate antioxidant defense systems, and help plant cells maintain osmotic pressure [126, 157-163]. For example, Zou [164] analyzed changes in root metabolites of walnut (Juglans regia) after inoculation with the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Diversispora spurca under drought conditions using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography. It was found that inoculation of plants with AMF under drought stress increased the activity of 49 metabolites (including 2,3,5-trihydroxy-5-7-dimethoxyflavanone) and decreased the activity of 116 metabolites [164]. In a study by Sheteiwy [165] it was shown that inoculation of soybean (Giza 111) with AMF together with rhizobacteria under stress conditions increased the content of primary metabolites and mitigated the drought-induced decrease in soluble sugars, lipids, protein, and oil, and resulted in decreased levels of stress hormones (abscisic acid) and increased gibberellin, trans-zeatin-riboside and indolylacetic acid in seeds of inoculated plants [165]. In another work on soybean, it was shown that inoculation of plants with mycorrhizal-rhizobial consortium during drought increased the relative water content of leaves and the amount of osmoprotectant proline in beans, as well as pod number, pod fresh weight and seed dry weight [68].

All these changes are based on molecular mechanisms associated with changes in gene expression and regulation of transcription factors [159]. For example, in [165] it was shown that AMF inoculation of plants induced the expression of genes involved in lipid and protein biosynthesis and blocked the expression of genes involved in their degradation. Studies of mycorrhizal fungi and soybean interactions have demonstrated that under soil drought conditions, AMP can trigger the expression of catalase and peroxidase genes in plants [166]. AMF have also been shown to significantly up-regulate the expression of key genes of ABA signaling pathway TFT2 and TFT3 in tomatoes under drought conditions [167]. Recently, mycorrhizal fungi were found to modulate plant drought tolerance through the regulation of transcription factors (GRAS, MYB, and AP2/ERF) [159]. Thus, the study of the molecular mechanisms of AMF assistance to plants during drought is ongoing. The findings contribute to the promising development of efficient agronomy.

5. Horizontal Gene Transfer in the Adaptation of Plant Pathogenic and Non-Pathogenic Beneficial Microbes under Drought

5.1. Genetic Exchange Employed by Pathogens through Horizontal Gene Transfer (HGT)

Drought and water deficit exert selective pressure on soil microbial communities, promoting genetic exchange as a survival strategy. Both non-pathogens and pathogens undergo horizontal gene transfer (HGT) to adapt to changing environmental conditions [168]. For example, in response to drought stress, nonpathogenic bacteria such as Pseudomonas putida can acquire stress tolerance genes [169], while pathogens such as Xylella fastidiosa can exchange genes related to virulence and host specificity [170].

Some genomic adaptation mechanisms to drought in pathogenic and nonpathogenic microorganisms, although having a common basis, differ in the direction of action (Figure 3). Such mechanisms include changes in gene expression and production of antioxidant enzymes. Both pathogenic and non-pathogenic microorganisms in response to drought regulate their gene expression toward the production of essential metabolites involved in defence mechanisms. However, non-pathogenic soil microbes, especially plant-growth promoting species, express genes associated with stimulating plant growth under stress conditions, for example Azospirillum brasilense produces large amounts of phytohormones [171]. Whereas pathogens during drought stimulate the expression of pathogenicity, virulence and host colonization factors (including adhesins, polysaccharides, LPS and degradative enzymes) as in Fusarium oxysporum [172] or Botrytis cinerea [173]. One of the key pathogenicity factors is the type III secretion system, which introduces effector proteins into the host cell cytosol to manipulate plant cellular processes, such as basal defense, to the benefit of the pathogen [174]. In addition, both microbial groups can produce antioxidant enzymes, but their main focus is different: non-pathogens use them to increase their own stress tolerance, such as Trichoderma harzianum [175], while pathogens use them to manipulate host invasion, such as the pathogen Botrytis cinerea [173]. Environmental stressors, including drought, can promote biofilm formation in both non-pathogenic and pathogenic microbes. Biofilms serve as foci of genetic exchange, facilitating interactions between different microbial species. For example, soil microbes responding to drought can engage in biofilm-mediated interactions, affecting the transfer of genetic material and contributing to the evolution of pathogenic and non-pathogenic traits [176]. However, rhizobacteria defend themselves against drought stress by forming biofilms that encompass plant roots and reorganize soil structure. Pathogens do not use this strategy as they need to invade rather than protect the plant. But some distinguish the adaptive strategy of pathogens from mutualistic microorganisms. These include the ability of pathogens to synthesize phytohormones that help suppress plant growth, as well as pathogenicity factors (absent in mutualistic microorganisms) that help them infect the host [115,177].

Drought and water deficit exert selective pressure on soil microbial communities, promoting genetic exchange as a survival strategy. Both pathogenic and non-pathogenic microorganisms undergo adaptive changes in response to drought stress [178,179]. Some of the common adaptation mechanisms include: production of osmo-protectants like trehalose, proline, glycine-betaine to maintain cellular osmotic balance [81]. Altered gene expression, production of antioxidant enzymes, and biofilm formation were facilitated during genetic exchange and interactions between microbial species [180]. However, there are also mechanisms that distinguish the adaptive strategies of pathogens vs. mutualistic microorganisms. Pathogens tend to focus more on virulence factors and suppressing plant growth, while mutualistic microbes enhance plant growth and stress tolerance [181,182]. Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) is an important adaptive mechanism, allowing both pathogenic and non-pathogenic microbes to acquire beneficial traits like stress tolerance and virulence factors [183]. Environmental stressors like drought can promote increased genetic exchange and the spread of pathogenic traits [184,185]. In summary, drought drives complex adaptive responses in soil microbial communities, involving both common and distinct mechanisms between pathogenic and beneficial microbes, with HGT playing a key role in their evolution and survival.

5.2. Virulence and Pathogenicity Gene Exchange under Drought

Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) (a mechanism by which DNA is transferred between unrelated organisms in a non-Mendelian manner) is fairly considered to be an important adaptation to unfavorable environmental conditions such as drought and desiccation [186,187]. Interspecific gene transfer was initially shown for bacteria, in which it occurs in more than 75% of all protein families [187,188]. Interspecies transfer of virulence genes from pathogenic to nonpathogenic cells was first studied, contributing to the virulence of(towards?) the new host and, as a consequence, the rapid spread of bacterial antibiotic resistance in hospitals [189]. In 2000, Walton suggested the possibility of HGT of toxin genes in fungal pathogens [190]. Friesen et al. (2006) [191] provided evidence that the gene encoding the critical virulence factor ToxA was transferred from one species of fungal phytopathogen Stagonospora nodorum, the causal agent of brown (or yellow) spot disease of wheat, to another fungus Pyrenophora tritici-repentis [191]. More recently, the wheat virulence protein encoding ToxA was shown to be horizontally transferred between three fungal pathogens of wheat (Parastagonospora nodorum, Pyrenophora tritici-repentis, and Bipolaris sorokiniana) as part of a conserved ∼14 kb element that contains coding and noncoding regions [192]. Knowledge in this area continues to expand. Recently, Japanese scientists proved that the genome of the wheat-infecting strain P. oryzae Br48 (isolated in Brazil in 1990 and belonging to an ancient MoT population that originated in South America in the 1980s) contains many genes derived from HGT [192]. A pathogenicity chromosome from a Fusarium pathogen to a non-pathogenic Fusarium species, making it pathogenic on tomato (3), which can have significant implications for agricultural and environmental health. Full-genome sequencing projects have made significant contributions to the study of the importance of HGT in the genome evolution of prokaryotes [193] and unicellular eukaryotes [186,194].

How HGT-derived genes are integrated into the epigenetic regulation system of the genome and how environmental conditions affect HGT, especially concerning virulence genes, are now on the agenda. During environmental stress, an increased potential for genetic exchange is created among plant-soil microorganisms (Figure 3). Stress-induced genetic exchange enables nonpathogenic microorganisms to acquire beneficial traits, increasing their ability to survive and contribute to plant health under unfavorable conditions [195]. On the other hand, there is a threat of greater spread of pathogenic traits and the emergence of new pathogenic strains [196]. However, the reverse can also occur with phytopathogenic microorganisms. It has been shown that in response to increased ambient temperature, phytopathogens can undergo genetic changes to increase heat tolerance, which affects (reduces) their ability to infect and survive in the soil [197]. Thus, in a study by Cubeta et al. [198], it was shown that to cope with water shortage and desiccation stress the pathogen Rhizoctonia spp. alters cellular and enzymatic functions, potentially changing cell virulence and pathogenicity. The effects extend to cellular, genetic, and enzymatic levels, affecting the overall adaptability and virulence of Rhizoctonia spp. [198]. That is, under drought conditions, Rhizoctonia spp. become non-pathogenic.

The soil and plant rhizosphere environments can promote HGT due to factors such as the presence of diverse microbial communities, the availability of nutrients, and environmental stressors that can select for the retention of transferred genes [199]. HGT is a common mechanism that allows the rapid spread of virulence and pathogenicity genes across microbial communities in soil and plant environments. Virulence genes frequently transferred horizontally include those involved in bacterial adherence, secretion systems, toxin production, and iron acquisition [200]. Examples include the virulence factors of Bacillus anthracis and Fusarium oxysporum causing severe diseases in plant root systems.

Therefore, drought, along with environmental fluctuations and water scarcity, profoundly impacts the dynamics of soil microbiomes, inducing alterations in the virulence and pathogenicity of microorganisms through processes like horizontal gene transfer and genetic exchange. The intricate interplay among environmental stressors, microbial community dynamics, and genetic exchange underscores the necessity for a thorough understanding of these mechanisms to effectively manage soil health and counteract the emergence of new pathogenic strains [201,202]. Further investigation is imperative to elucidate the precise mechanisms through which drought stress influences genetic exchange and its role in shaping the virulence and pathogenicity of soil microbiomes. By examining the dynamics of soil microbial communities under varied stress conditions, we can gain insight into how genetic exchange contributes to the adaptability and resilience of both non-pathogenic and pathogenic microbes.

5.3. Implication of Genomic Changes in the Plant-Soil System under Drought

Research indicates that soil microbes play a significant role in shaping plant responses to both biotic and abiotic stresses, such as drought. This involvement is multifaceted, encompassing changes in the architecture of the host plant’s root system through hormonal regulation, osmoregulation, signaling via reactive oxygen species (ROS), induction of systemic tolerance (IST), production of large-chain extracellular polysaccharides (EPS), and transcriptional regulation of the host’s stress response genes [142,203]. An integrated approach to managing the rhizosphere is proposed as a strategy for mitigating drought stress in plants, with a specific emphasis on rhizosphere management. This holistic method may involve rhizosphere manipulation through the introduction of drought-tolerant bacteria, nanoparticles, liquid nano clay (LNC), nutrients, and organic matter, in conjunction with plant modification using advanced genome editing tools like CRISPR/Cas9, aimed at promptly addressing evolving agricultural challenges. Several mechanisms facilitate genomic changes including horizontal gene transfer (HGT) in soil and plant-associated microbial communities, including conjugation, which is a common mode of HGT, is where bacteria can transfer genetic material via cell-to-cell contact and specialized transfer machinery, such as sex pili [204]. Secondly, there is transformation, in which bacteria can also take up free DNA from the environment through natural competence and incorporate it into their genomes, a process known as transformation. Thirdly, transduction is where bacteriophages (viruses that infect bacteria) can package and transfer bacterial DNA between host cells, a process called transduction (3) and lastly, conjugative plasmids, which carry genes for their transfer, can facilitate the spread of virulence and antibiotic-resistance genes between bacterial communities [205]. Bacteria, horizontal gene transfer (HGT) and horizontal chromosome transfer (HCT) have also been observed in plant pathogenic fungi, allowing them to broaden their host range [202]. Examples include the transfer of virulence genes in Alternaria alternata and Fusarium oxysporum. The origin and mechanisms of how DNA exchange occurs after microbial anastomosis or fusion events, which can facilitate unusual HGT or HCT, are still largely unknown and remain a major challenge to understand.

5.4. Shift of Pathogens and Non-Pathogens through HGT under Drought

Drought stress can have significant impacts on soil-borne plant pathogens and beneficial microbes, including effects on their genetic exchange. Drought stress can alter the composition and dynamics of the soil microbial community, making bacteria more dominant over fungi [206]. This shift in the microbial balance can lead to a decline in the quality of organic substances in the rhizosphere, which can negatively impact plant health. Drought can also directly reduce the activity and diversity of beneficial microbes like plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and mycorrhizal fungi. This can diminish their ability to protect plants against soil-borne pathogens and provide nutrients. The key evidence supporting this claim is that drought conditions can trigger abrupt and persistent shifts in the structural and functional attributes of the soil microbial community, including reduced microbial functional capacity and modified taxonomic composition [207]. This drought-induced stress on the soil microbiome may increase the likelihood of HGT and HCT events, as microbes allocate more resources towards survival mechanisms than normal metabolic functions.

On the other hand, some soil-borne pathogens like Phytophthora can thrive better under drier conditions, leading to increased disease severity [208]. Drought-stressed plants also become more susceptible to infection by these pathogens (4). Drought can further impact genetic exchange between microbes in the rhizosphere. Reduced soil moisture and nutrient availability can limit horizontal gene transfer between bacteria, fungi, and oomycetes. This can constrain the spread of beneficial traits like antibiotic production or drought tolerance. In summary, drought disrupts the delicate balance between soil-borne pathogens and beneficial microbes. It can selectively favour certain pathogens, diminish the protective effects of PGPR and mycorrhizae, and limit genetic exchange that could otherwise improve microbial adaptations to stress [206,208]. These results explain that under drought stress, soil microorganisms have to divert more energy towards adjusting to the water deficit, such as producing osmolytes and increasing enzyme synthesis. This shift in resource allocation under drought conditions may increase the likelihood of HGT and HCT events between soil microbes. This is because microbes under stress are more likely to engage in mechanisms like conjugation, transduction, and transformation that facilitate the horizontal transfer of genetic material, rather than focusing on their regular cellular processes. There are several ways that soil microbes adapt to drought depending on the nature of microbes either pathogenetic or mutualistic fungi or bacteria. Adaptions such as through tolerance strategies like osmolyte production and dormancy, as well as changes in community composition with drought-tolerant taxa becoming more dominant. However, the role of HGT in shifting processes between pathogens and non-pathogens is not clearly understood and new hypotheses and predictions are evolving [209].

6. Summary

The review has provided a detailed examination of the contrasting adaptive strategies employed by beneficial and pathogenic soil bacterial and fungal communities in response to climate-induced drought and desiccation stresses. Key results are: 1. Both pathogenic and non-pathogenic microorganisms undergo a range of cellular, genetic, and enzymatic changes to survive under drought conditions. Common adaptation mechanisms include the production of osmoprotectants, altered gene expression, and biofilm formation. 2. There are distinct differences in the focus of adaptive strategies between pathogens and mutualistic (beneficial) microbes. Pathogens tend to prioritize virulence factors and suppress plant growth, while beneficial microbes enhance plant growth and stress tolerance. 3. Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) is a crucial adaptive mechanism, allowing both pathogenic and non-pathogenic microbes to acquire beneficial traits like stress tolerance and virulence factors. Environmental stressors like drought can promote increased genetic exchange and the spread of pathogenic traits. 4. The complex interplay between drought-adapted microbes, both beneficial and pathogenic, and their interactions with plants, highlights the need for a deeper understanding of soil microbiome dynamics under climate change. In conclusion, this review highlights the various survival strategies of soil microorganisms during climate induced drought and desiccation, shedding light on the adaptive mechanisms and evolutionary trajectories of both beneficial and pathogenic soil microbiome members. These insights are crucial for enhancing sustainable agriculture, aiding experts in agronomy, pathology, microbiology, ecology, and policy. With this knowledge, researchers can lead pioneering studies and develop effective strategies to combat challenges posed by global warming. Utilizing innovative methods to harness plant-soil microbial resources, these efforts aim to significantly benefit crop producers globally.