Submitted:
10 July 2024
Posted:
10 July 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Microorganisms and Preparation of Inoculum
2.2. Waste Materials used For the Reformulation of Bacterial Cellulose Media
2.3. Reformulation of HS Culture Medium using Agro Wastes for BC Production
2.4. Solid-State Fermentation of Rice Bran (RB) and Cereal Dust (CD)
2.5. BC Production from Treated and Untreated Waste Substrates
2.6. Characterisation of BC produced from SSF-Treated Substrates
2.7. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS)
2.8. Fourier-Transformed Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)
2.9. X-ray Diffraction (XRD)
2.10. Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA)
3. Results
3.1. Solid-State Fermentation of Rice Bran and Cereal Dust
3.2. Media Substitution using SSF-Treated Rice Bran and Cereal Dust
3.3. Comparative Analyses of the BC produced from SSF-Treated Rice Bran and Cereal Dust
3.3.1. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
3.3.2. Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS) Analysis
3.3.3. Fourier-Transformed Infrared Spectroscope (FTIR)
3.3.4. X-ray Diffraction (XRD)
3.3.5. Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA)
3.3.6. Cost Analysis
4. Discussion
5. Conclusion
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Hussain, Z., et al., Production of bacterial cellulose from industrial wastes: a review. Cellulose, 2019. 26(5): p. 2895-2911. [CrossRef]
- Dungani, R., et al., Agricultural waste fibers towards sustainability and advanced utilization: A review. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 2016. 15(1-2): p. 42-55. [CrossRef]
- Kamal, T., et al., Cost-Effective Synthesis of Bacterial Cellulose and Its Applications in the Food and Environmental Sectors. Gels, 2022. 8(9). [CrossRef]
- Brunschwiler, C., et al., Direct measurement of rice bran lipase activity for inactivation kinetics and storage stability prediction. Journal of Cereal Science, 2013. 58(2): p. 272-277. [CrossRef]
- Christopher Narh, et al., Rice Bran, an Alternative Nitrogen Source for Acetobacter xylinum Bacterial Cellulose Synthesis. Bioresources.com, 2018. 13(2): p. 4346-4363. [CrossRef]
- Galanakis, C.M., Recovery of high added-value components from food wastes: Conventional, emerging technologies and commercialized applications. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 2012. 26(2): p. 68-87. [CrossRef]
- Urbina, L., et al., A review of bacterial cellulose: sustainable production from agricultural waste and applications in various fields. Cellulose, 2021. 28(13): p. 8229-8253. [CrossRef]
- Hayder Kh. Q. Ali1, a.M.M.D.Z., Utilization of Agro-Residual Ligno-Cellulosic Substances by Using Solid State Fermentation: A Review. Croatian Journal of Food Technology, Biotechnology, 2011. 6 (1-2), 5-12.
- Kupski, L., et al., Solid-state fermentation for the enrichment and extraction of proteins and antioxidant compounds in rice bran by Rhizopus oryzae. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 2012. 55(6): p. 937-942. [CrossRef]
- Ellaiah, P., et al., Production of lipase by immobilized cells of Aspergillus niger. Process Biochemistry, 2004. 39(5): p. 525-528. [CrossRef]
- Adinarayana, K., P. Ellaiah, and D.S. Prasad, Purification and partial characterization of thermostable serine alkaline protease from a newly isolated Bacillus subtilis PE-11. AAPS PharmSciTech, 2003. 4(4): p. 56. [CrossRef]
- Baysal, Z., F. Uyar, and Ç. Aytekin, Solid state fermentation for production of α-amylase by a thermotolerant Bacillus subtilis from hot-spring water. Process Biochemistry, 2003. 38(12): p. 1665-1668. [CrossRef]
- Sodhi, H.K., et al., Production of a thermostable α-amylase from Bacillus sp. PS-7 by solid state fermentation and its synergistic use in the hydrolysis of malt starch for alcohol production. Process Biochemistry, 2005. 40(2): p. 525-534. [CrossRef]
- Sukma, A.C.T., H. Oktavianty, and S. Sumardiono, Optimization of solid-state fermentation condition for crude protein enrichment of rice bran using Rhizopus oryzae in tray bioreactor. Indonesian Journal of Biotechnology, 2021. 26(1). [CrossRef]
- Shriya Henry, V.B.J., Huseyin Sumer, Production of Bacterial Cellulose from Agricultural Wastes for Tissue Scaffold Application. Swinburne University of Technology, 2024.
- Oliveira, M.d.S., et al., Changes in lipid, fatty acids and phospholipids composition of whole rice bran after solid-state fungal fermentation. Bioresource Technology, 2011. 102(17): p. 8335-8338.
- Borzani, W. and S.J.d. Souza, Mechanism of the film thickness increasing during the bacterial production of cellulose on non-agitated liquid media. 1995. 17(11): p. 1271–1272.
- Ruka, D.R., G.P. Simon, and K.M. Dean, Altering the growth conditions of Gluconacetobacter xylinus to maximize the yield of bacterial cellulose. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2012. 89(2): p. 613-622. [CrossRef]
- Nam, S., et al., Segal crystallinity index revisited by the simulation of X-ray diffraction patterns of cotton cellulose Ibeta and cellulose II. Carbohydr Polym, 2016. 135: p. 1-9.
- Wang, J., J. Tavakoli, and Y. Tang, Bacterial cellulose production, properties and applications with different culture methods – A review. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2019. 219(May): p. 63-76.
- Holmes, D., Bacterial Cellulose. Master of Engineering, Department of Chemical and Process Engineering University of Canterbury Christchurch, New Zealand, 2004.
- Aytekin, A.Ö., D.D. Demirbağ, and T. Bayrakdar, The statistical optimization of bacterial cellulose production via semi-continuous operation mode. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 2016. 37: p. 243-250. [CrossRef]
- Abdelraof, M., M.S. Hasanin, and H. El -Saied, Ecofriendly green conversion of potato peel wastes to high productivity bacterial cellulose. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2019. 211: p. 75-83.
- Mohammadkazemi, F., M. Azin, and A. Ashori, Production of bacterial cellulose using different carbon sources and culture media. Carbohydr Polym, 2015. 117: p. 518-523. [CrossRef]
- Du, R., et al., Production and characterization of bacterial cellulose produced by Gluconacetobacter xylinus isolated from Chinese persimmon vinegar. Carbohydr Polym, 2018. 194: p. 200-207. [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.-S., et al., Physicochemical characterization of high-quality bacterial cellulose produced by Komagataeibacter sp. strain W1 and identification of the associated genes in bacterial cellulose production. RSC Advances, 2017. 7(71): p. 45145-45155. [CrossRef]
- Dórame-Miranda, R.F., et al., Bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter entanii using pecan nutshell as carbon source and its chemical functionalization. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2019. 207: p. 91-99. [CrossRef]
- Rani, M.U. and A. Appaiah, Optimization of culture conditions for bacterial cellulose production from Gluconacetobacter hansenii UAC09. Annals of Microbiology, 2011. 61(4): p. 781-787. [CrossRef]
- Slapšak, N., et al., Gluconacetobacter maltaceti sp. nov., a novel vinegar producing acetic acid bacterium. Systematic and applied microbiology, 2013. 36(1): p. 17-21. [CrossRef]
- Bi, J.C., et al., Morphology and structure characterization of bacterial celluloses produced by different strains in agitated culture. Journal of applied microbiology, 2014. 117(5): p. 1305-1311. [CrossRef]
- Kongruang, S., Bacterial Cellulose Production by Acetobacter xylinum Strains from Agricultural Waste Products. Appl Biochem Biotechnol, 2008. [CrossRef]
- De Souza, K.C., et al., Production of bacterial cellulose biopolymers in media containing rice and corn hydrolysate as carbon sources. Polymers and Polymer Composites, 2021. 29(9_suppl): p. S1466-S1474.
- Popescu, C.-M., et al., Spectral Characterization of Eucalyptus Wood. Applied Spectroscopy, 2007. 61(11): p. 1168-1177. [CrossRef]
- Mendoza, D.J., et al., Controlling the transparency and rheology of nanocellulose gels with the extent of carboxylation. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2020. 245: p. 116566. [CrossRef]
- Castro, C., et al., Structural characterization of bacterial cellulose produced by Gluconacetobacter swingsii sp. from Colombian agroindustrial wastes. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2011. 84(1): p. 96-102. [CrossRef]
- Tayo Adebayo Bc, M.O.A.J.F.S., Effect of different fruit juice media on bacterial cellulose production by Acinetobacter sp. BAN1 and Acetobacter pasteurianus PW1. J Adv Biol Biotechnol, 2017. 14: p. 2394-1081.








| Samples | Oven-dried | Freeze-dried | ||
| C | O | C | O | |
| Rice bran | 68.0% | 32.0% | 75.1% | 24.9% |
| Rice bran (Pleurotus osteratus) | 68.7% | 31.3% | 63.7% | 36.3% |
| Rice bran (Rhizopus oryzae) | 67.0% | 33.0% | 57.6% | 42.4% |
| Rice bran (Rhizopus oligosporus) | 65.2% | 34.8% | 59.6% | 40.4% |
| Cereal Dust | 65.4% | 34.6% | 59.8% | 40.2% |
| Cereal Dust (Pleurotus osteratus) | 64.3% | 35.7% | 57.1% | 42.9% |
| Cereal dust (Rhizopus oryzae) | 63.2% | 36.8% | 53.8% | 46.2% |
| Cereal dust (Rhizopus oligosporus) | 59.9% | 40.1% | 53.8% | 46.2% |
| Crystallinity Index | ||
| Bacterial cellulose samples | Oven-dried | Freeze-dried |
| Rice bran | 94.3% | - |
| Rice bran (Pleurotus osteratus) | 83.8% | 69.3% |
| Rice bran (Rhizopus Oryzae) | 72.0% | 72.0% |
| Rice bran (Rhizopus oligosporus) | 95.2% | 79.0% |
| Cereal Dust | 98.8% | 99.6% |
| Cereal Dust (Pleurotus osteratus) | 98.6% | 97.4% |
| Cereal dust (Rhizopus Oryzae) | 99.8% | 96.2% |
| Cereal dust (Rhizopus oligosporus) | 94.9% | 89.8% |
![]() |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
