Submitted:
25 June 2024
Posted:
26 June 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Sample Selection
2.2. Representative Elementary Volume (REV) for Reservoirs with Different Permeabilities
- As the dimension size increases and scanning resolution size decreases, the calculated permeability stabilizes, and the difference between the calculated and measured values decreases. This proves that a digital rock model constructed at a reasonable size can effectively determine fluid flow characteristics within the interior pore structure of the rock core.
- Considering the economy and the allowable margin of error in engineering practice, maintaining the calculated permeability error within 10%, as indicated by the red dashed line (Figure 2), is deemed to fulfil the optimal alignment requirement for the REV and the critical resolution.
- For different reservoir rocks ranging from ultra-high permeability to middle permeability, the required minimum REV decreases along with a decrease in the pore characteristic size, with a corresponding increase in the required scanning resolution size. Specifically, for ultra-high permeability reservoirs, the minimum REV should not fall below 1200 μm, and the upper limit of resolution size should be less than 8 μm/voxel. In the case of high permeability reservoirs, the minimum REV should be no less than 800 μm, and the upper limit of resolution size is suggested to be lower than 4 μm/voxel. For mid-permeability reservoirs, the minimum REV should be not less than 600 μm, and the accurate capture of pore structure requires high scanning resolution, with the maximum resolution size not exceeding 2 μm/voxel.
2.3. Long-term waterflooding experiments
2.4. Construction of Pore Network Model
3. Three-Dimensional Characterization of Microscopic Pore Structure
3.1. Pore Structure Classification Method
- 4.
- Pore diameter R. This parameter is used to represent the distribution and morphological characteristics of the granular pores within the sandstone, as the pore diameter directly influences the resistance experienced by fluids during interior fluid flow in pore structure. By comprehensively analysing the distributional features for throat diameters across sandstone rocks with different permeabilities, pore structure was classified into three categories—large, mid, and small pores—by employing a pore diameter-versus-pore volume percentage curve. The boundaries were set to pore diameters corresponding to 33.3% and 66.6% volume percentages of the total pore volume with reference to the contribution of pore volume.
- 5.
- Flow flux area S. As a new characterisation parameter for pore structure, the flow flux area quantifies the connectivity of pores by counting the areas of all throats associated with each pore. This treatment can be derived from the product of the coordination number (or the number of throats linked to a single pore) and the average throat area. The flow flux area is a more direct representation of the low permeable capacity, which is vital for comprehending and evaluating the connectivity within the sandstone rocks and the effect of pore and throat dimensions on variations in local permeability. Given the negative skew distribution observed in the relationship between the flow flux area and the corresponding pore volume percentage, the median value of the flow flux area from this curve (313 μm²) was selected as the boundary for classifying the pores into high and low connectivity.
3.2. Evaluation on Classified Reservoir Pore Structure
4. Pore Structure Variation Characteristics
4.1. Evolutionary Patterns of Classified Reservoir Pore Structures
4.2. Variation Characteristics for Different Pore Types
5. Conclusions
- (1)
- Different pore structures among different reservoir types are identified in mid-high permeability reservoirs. Ultra-high-permeability reservoirs in Daqing oilfields are significantly varied in pore diameter and distribution, featuring extensive pore diameters and high pore-throat connectivity. As permeability decreases, high-permeability rock demonstrates narrower pore diameter ranges with finer throats, whereas mid-permeability rock exhibits numerous smaller pores and throats and the low penetrating quality due to the reduced throat size.
- (2)
- An evaluation method for pore structure classification is established based on local and global permeable capacity. This study creatively introduces the flow flux area to indicate throat flow capacity. By proposing a classification approach of the complex porous system in rocks, the micro-pore structure is categorised into high-connectivity large pores, low-connectivity large pores, high-connectivity mid pores, low-connectivity mid pores, high-connectivity small pores, and low-connectivity small pores, which further reflects the differences of conveyance strength at pore scale.
- (3)
- Micro-pore structure differences between sandstone rocks with different permeabilities are presented. Ultra-high- and high-permeability rocks are dominated by mid- and high-connectivity large pores and show robust storage and permeation capabilities, whereas mid-permeability rock is composed of small pores, which indicates that the pore connectivity rely on the effective interconnectivity of these small pores and their permeable capacity declines as the pore type changes.
- (4)
- The long-term water flooding variation in pore structure is defined for classified sandstone rocks. As water injection increases, the permeable capacity and connectivity of high-connectivity pore spaces are strengthened in ultra-high- and high-permeability rocks. In contrast, despite the overall improvement in connectivity, the mid-permeability rock witnesses an increase in low-connectivity small pores and an expansion in their distribution, which accelerates micro-heterogeneity.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Hou, L.H.; Li, H.W.; Li, Q. Characteristics of oil and gas discoveries in recent 20 years and future exploration in the world. Pet. Explor. Dev. 2018, 23, 44–53. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, H.; Shan, G.J.; Du, Q.L.; Wang, C.X. Technical challenges and solutions of water flooding development in late stage of ultra-high water cut in placanticline oilfield in Daqing. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing 2022, 41, 60–66. [Google Scholar]
- Yuan, Q.F.; Pang, Y.M.; Du, Q.L.; Fang, Y.J.; Zhao, Y.F.; Lu, H.M. Development laws of the sandstone oilfields at extra-high watercut stage. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing 2017, 36, 49–55. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, K.; Wang, R.; Shi, W.Z.; Martín, J.D.; Qi, R.; Zhang, W.; Qin, S.; Travé, A. Full scale of pore-throat size distribution and its control on petrophysical properties of the Shanxi Formation tight sandstone reservoir in the North Ordos Basin, China. Lithosphere 2023, v20222358721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Q.; You, X.L.; Li, J.S.; Zhou, Y.; Lu, H.; Wu, S.H.; Yue, D.L.; Zhang, H.M. Pore structure and factors controlling shale reservoir quality: Acase study of Chang 7 Formation in the Southern Ordos Basin, China. Enerigies 2024, 17, 1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Keith, W. S.; Robert, M. C. The evolution of pore-scale fluid-saturation in low-permeability sandstone reservoirs. AAPG Bulletin 2015, 99, 1957–1990. [Google Scholar]
- Coskun, S.B.; Wardlaw, N.C. Image analysis for estimating ultimate oil recovery efficiency by waterflooding for two sandstone reservoirs. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 1996, 15, 237–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Y.; Wu, S.T.; Li, Z.P.; Zhu, R.K.; Xie, S.Y.; Zhai, X.F.; Lei, L. Investigation of microscopic pore structure and permeability prediction in sand-conglomerate reservoirs. J. Earth Sci. 2021, 32, 818–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, L.; Bi, L.; Yi, T.; Lei, Y.T.; Wei, Q.L. Pore structure characteristics and influencing factors of tight reservoirs controlled by different provenance systems: A case study of the Chang 7 Members in Heshui and Xin’anbian of the Ordos Basin. Energies 2023, 16, 3410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mu, C.H.; Hua, H.J.; Wang, X.K. Characterization of pore structure and reservoir properties of tight sandstone with CTS, SEM, and HPMI: A case study of the tight oil reservoir in fuyu oil layers of Sanzhao Sag, Songliao basin, NE China. Front. Energy Res. 2023, 10, 1053919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dai, Z.; Luo, D.L.; Xie, M.Y. A new method for particle size analysis of cuttings images based on improved watershed algorithm. China Offshore Oil Gas 2019, 31, 103–107. [Google Scholar]
- Jiang, Z.L.; Pan, Y.J.; Fu, C.Q.; Li, W.W.; Wang, Y.C.; Long, W.J. Three-dimensional pore structure characterization of cement paste by X-ray computed tomography (XCT) and focused ion beam/scanning electron microscopy (FIB/SEM). Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 383, 131379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bijoyendra, B.; Sushanta, K.; Douglas, V. Understanding the micro structure of Berea Sandstone by the simultaneous use of micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) and focused ion beam-scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM). Micron 2011, 42, 412–418. [Google Scholar]
- Gu, N.L.; Hu, W.S.; Gao, L.Y.; Liu, G.W. Three-dimensional spatial microscopic characteristics and developmental influencing factors of tight gas layers in Hangjinqi Prospect Area, Ordos Basin, China. Energies 2024, 17, 399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sakdinawat, A.; Attwood, D. Nanoscale X-ray Imaging. Nat. Photonics 2010, 267, 840–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ju, Y.; Gong, W.; Xie, H.; Chang, C.; Xie, L.; Liu, P. Three-dimensional characterisation of multi-scale structures of the Silurian Longmaxi shale using focused ion beam-scanning electron microscopy and reconstruction technology. J. Nat Gas Sci. Eng. 2017, 46, 26–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dmitriy, A.M.; Shadfar, D.; Ali, K.; Masoud, R.; Yousef, K.; Ma, T.S. Multiscale and diverse spatial heterogeneity analysis of void structures in reef carbonate reservoirs. Geoenergy Sci. Eng. 2024, 233, 212569. [Google Scholar]
- Ali, A.A.; Namam, M.S.; Dmirriy, A.M. Paleoenvironmental evaluation using an integrated microfacies evidence and triangle model diagram: A case study from Khurmala Formation, Northeastern Iraq. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2023, 11, 2162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ju, Y.; Xi, C.; Zheng, J.; Gong, W.; Wu, J.; Wang, S.; Mao, L. Study on three-dimensional immiscible water–Oil two-phase displacement and trapping in deformed pore structures subjected to varying geostress via in situ computed tomography scanning and additively printed models, Int. J. Eng. Sci. 2022, 171, 103615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.J.; Sun, J.Y.; Cao, Y.F.; Zhong, X.; Li, S.X. Research of micro-pore structure and seepage characteristics of Portugal Reservoir in Lamadian Oilfield. Mineral Exploration 2023, 14, 1402–1411. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, J.J.; Wu, S.H.; Xiao, S.M.; Guo, S.H.; Lv, Z.Q.; Jiao, H.Y.; Guo, Z.H.; Liu, Z.W.; Wu, H.; Xiao, Q. Distribution characteristics of micropore throat size of turbidite sandstone reservoir in middle sub-member of 3rd member, Shahejie Formation in Dongying Depression. Journal of China University of Petroleum 2021, 45, 12–21. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, J.; Yang, Y.; Yin, J.C.; Liu, Y.; Li, X.W. Study on pore structure evolution characteristics of weakly cemented sandstone under freeze–thaw based on NMR. Water 2023, 15, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, D.Y.; Zhu, Y.S.; Wang, W.; Zhang, L.L.; Tang, J.Y.; Ren, J.L.; Wang, Y.Z. Pore structure of tight sandstones with differing permeability: The He 8 Member of the Middle Permian Lower Shihezi Formation, Gaoqiao area, Ordos Basin. Energy Sci. Eng. 2024, 12, 117–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Q.P.; Qi, H.P.; Huo, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, T.; Zhang, D.D.; Lin, K.; Yang, C.; Tong, J.; Zhao, H.; Suo, B.S.; Xue, Y.L.; Yi, C.P. Study of pore-throat structure characteristics and fluid mobility of Chang 7 tight sandstone reservoir in Jiyuan area, Ordos Basin. Open Geosciences 2023, 15, 20220534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.B.; Fu, L.; Chen, X.J.; Zhang, T.; Xie, Y.H.; Wang, H.B.; Zhu, Y.S. Quantitative Evaluation Method for Micro Heterogeneity of Tight Sandstone: A case study of Chang-6 reservoir of Yanchang Formation in Huaqing area, Ordos Basin. Acta Sedimentol. Sin. 2021, 39, 1086–1099. [Google Scholar]
- Gong, W.; Liu, Y.; Xi, C.; Ju, Y.; Wang, M. Dynamic characterization of residual oil during long-term waterflooding experiments in heterogeneous porous structures. Fuel, 2024, 356, 129567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, X.X.; Li, A.F.; Wang, Y.Z.; Wu, S.T.; Wang, G.J. Pore structure of tight sand reservoir and its influence on percolation-taking the Chang 8 reservoir in Maling oilfield in Ordos basin as an example. Oil & Gas Geology 2015, 36, 774–779. [Google Scholar]
- Guo, H.K.; Liu, Q.; Li, H.B.; Meng, Z.Q.; Bai, Y.W. Characteristics of pore structure of Jurassic tight reservoir in Sichuan basin. Journal of Shenzhen University (Science and Engineering) 2013, 30, 306–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pei, Z.S.; Zhou, Z.G.; Chang, W.; Zhang, Y. Type division and reservoir characteristics of micro-pore structure in S area of Daqing placantieline. Petroleum Geology and Engineering 2022, 36, 82–87. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, W.; Li, X.Z.; Yang, Z.M.; Xiong, S.C.; Luo, Y.T.; Zhao, X.L. Modeling of 3D rock porous media by combining X-Ray CT and Markov chain Monte Carlo. Journal of Energy Resources Technology - Transactions of the ASME 2020, 142, 013001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yun, L. Reconstruction and analysis of tight sandstone digital rock combined with X-ray CT scanning and multiple-point geostatistics algorithm. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2020, v20209476060. [Google Scholar]
- Song, R.; Wang, Y.; Liu, J.J.; Cui, M.M.; Lei, Y. Comparative analysis on pore-scale permeability prediction on micro-CT images of rock using numerical and empirical approaches. Energy Science and Engineering 2019, 7, 2842–2854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fatt, I. The network model of porous media. SPE 1956, 207, 144–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Gong, W.; Zhao, Y.; Jin, X.; Wang, M. A Pore-Throat Segmentation Method Based on Local Hydraulic Resistance Equivalence for Pore-Network Modeling. Water Resour. Res. 2022, 58, e2022WR033142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meng, J.; Zhang, L.Y.; Li, R.; Zhao, A.F.; Zhu, B.W.; Huang, P.; Shen, S.B. Microscopic pore structure characteristics of tight sandstone reservoirs and its classification evaluation. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs 2023, 30, 71–78. [Google Scholar]
- Pang, Y.D.; Liu, Y.L.; Zhang, L.; Xi, N.N.; Yuan, L.J.; Chen, C.B. Micro-pore structure and fluid mobility of tight sandstone reservoirs of Chang 8 menber in Huachi area in Ordos basin. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing 2023, 42, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Ran, X.Q.; Wu, S.H.; Fu, J.; Wei, X.S.; Chu, M.J. Research on the pore structure classification of low permeability reservoir of the Yanchang formation in Longdong area, Ordos basin. Earth Science Frontiers 2013, 20, 77–85. [Google Scholar]











| Sample Number | Reservoir Type | Lithologic feature | Porosity (%) |
Air Permeability (10−3 μm2) |
Length (cm) | Diameter (cm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ultra-high-permeability reservoir | Fine sandstone | 30.96 | 3956 | 3.53 | 2.47 |
| 2 | Ultra-high-permeability reservoir | Fine sandstone | 30.26 | 2568 | 3.83 | 2.47 |
| 3 | High-permeability reservoir | Siltstone | 29.32 | 1890 | 4.94 | 2.49 |
| 4 | High-permeability reservoir | Siltstone | 28.84 | 1398 | 4.73 | 2.48 |
| 5 | Mid-permeability reservoir | Siltstone | 27.79 | 381 | 4.03 | 2.47 |
| 6 | Mid-permeability reservoir | Siltstone | 27.33 | 238 | 3.91 | 2.48 |
| Reservoir Type | Sample Number | Resolution size (μm/voxel) |
Dimension Size (μm) | Boundary Condition | Reynolds Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ultra-high –permeability & high-permeability reservoirs | 2, 4 | 2, 4, 8 | 800, 1200, 1600, 2000 | Pressure Boundary | ~0.01 |
| Mid-permeability reservoir | 5 | 1, 2, 4 | 440, 520, 580, 640 |
| Sample Size | Diameter 4 mm, Length 8 mm, Scanning resolution 2 μm | |||||||
| Displacement Nodes | Dry sample | Oil-bearing | 0.5PV | 1.0PV | 3.0 PV | 10.0PV | 50.0PV | 500.0PV |
| Displacement Speed | / | / | 1 m/d | 1 m/d | 1 m/d | 3 m/d | 10 m/d | 10 m/d |
| Pore Structure Type |
Criteria for classification | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Pore Diameter/μm | Flux area/μm2 | ||
| Large-pore | High connectivity | >84 | >313 |
| Low connectivity | >84 | ≤313 | |
| Mid-pore | High connectivity | (58,84] | >313 |
| Low connectivity | (58,84] | ≤313 | |
| Small pore | High connectivity | ≤58 | >313 |
| Low connectivity | ≤58 | ≤313 | |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).