Submitted:
13 June 2024
Posted:
14 June 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
2.1.1. Raw Materials
2.1.2. Preparation of WSA
2.1.3. Definitions of the Design of Mixtures
2.2. Methods
2.2.1. Experimental Design and Predicting Modeling/Carbon Footprint
2.2.2. Mixing and Preparation of Specimens
2.2.3. Particle Size Distribution
2.2.4. Compressive Strength Tests
2.2.5. Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy/Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy
2.2.6. Isothermal Calorimetry
2.2.7. X-ray Fluorescence
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Discussion of the Experimental Results
3.1.1. Particle Size Distribution
3.1.2. Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy
3.1.3. Isothermal Calorimetry
3.1.4. X-ray Fluorescence of Raw Materials
3.1.5. BBD Experimental Design
3.1.6. Compressive Strength of Hardened Samples
3.2. Multiple Regression Analysis and Design Model
3.2.1. Data Analysis and Model Adjustment
3.2.2. Models and Interactions Effect of Factors
3.2.3. Model Validation
3.2.4. Carbon Footprint
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Global Cement and Concrete Association, Concrete Future - The GCCA 2050 Cement and Concrete Industry Roadmap for Net Zero Concrete, (2021) 1–48. https://gccassociation.org/concretefuture/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/GCCA-Concrete-Future-Roadmap.pdf.
- J. Skocek, M. Zajac, M. Ben Haha, Carbon Capture and Utilization by mineralization of cement pastes derived from recycled concrete, Sci. Rep. 10 (2020) 1–12. [CrossRef]
- D.L. Summerbell, C.Y. Barlow, J.M. Cullen, Potential reduction of carbon emissions by performance improvement: A cement industry case study, J. Clean. Prod. 135 (2016) 1327–1339. [CrossRef]
- K.L. Scrivener, V.M. John, E.M. Gartner, Eco-efficient cements: Potential economically viable solutions for a low-CO2 cement-based materials industry, Cem. Concr. Res. 114 (2018) 2–26. [CrossRef]
- N. Müller, J. Harnisch, A blueprint for a climate friendly cement industry, Rep. WWF–Lafarge Conserv. Partnership. (2008).
- Centro UC Políticas Públicas, déficit cero, Déficit Habitacional: ¿Cuántas familias necesitan una vivienda y en qué territorios?, (2022). https://cchc.cl/uploads/comunicacion/archivos/ESTUDIO_DEFICIT_HABITACIONAL_BOLETIN1.pdf.
- Habitat for Humanity, Annual Report 2020, (2020) 4–10. https://habitatbrasil.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Annual-Report-2020.pdf.
- Departamento Administrativo Nacional De Estadistica, Boletín Técnico: Déficit Habitacional CNPV 2018, (2022) 20. https://www.dane.gov.co/files/investigaciones/deficit-habitacional/Boletin-tec-deficit-hab-2021.pdf.
- F. Lago, Estimación de la evolución del déficit habitacional en la Argentina, Buenos Aires, 2016. https://biblioteca.camarco.org.ar/PDFS/Serie 26 Libros Completos/03 - Estimación de la evolución del Déficit H. Arg (dig).pdf.
- B. Lothenbach, K. Scrivener, R.D. Hooton, Supplementary cementitious materials, Cem. Concr. Res. 41 (2011) 1244–1256. [CrossRef]
- J.J. Brooks, M.A. Megat Johari, Effect of metakaolin on creep and shrinkage of concrete, Cem. Concr. Compos. 23 (2001) 495–502. [CrossRef]
- C.H. Huang, S.K. Lin, C.S. Chang, H.J. Chen, Mix proportions and mechanical properties of concrete containing very high-volume of Class F fly ash, Constr. Build. Mater. 46 (2013) 71–78. [CrossRef]
- K.M. Liew, A.O. Sojobi, L.W. Zhang, Green concrete: Prospects and challenges, Constr. Build. Mater. 156 (2017) 1063–1095. [CrossRef]
- P. Łukowski, A. Salih, Durability of mortars containing ground granulated blast-furnace slag in acid and sulphate environment, Procedia Eng. 108 (2015) 47–54. [CrossRef]
- M.S. Meddah, M.A. Ismail, S. El-Gamal, H. Fitriani, Performances evaluation of binary concrete designed with silica fume and metakaolin, Constr. Build. Mater. 166 (2018) 400–412. [CrossRef]
- E. Özbay, M. Erdemir, H.I. Durmuş, Utilization and efficiency of ground granulated blast furnace slag on concrete properties - A review, Constr. Build. Mater. 105 (2016) 423–434. [CrossRef]
- R. Siddique, J. Klaus, Influence of metakaolin on the properties of mortar and concrete: A review, Appl. Clay Sci. 43 (2009) 392–400. [CrossRef]
- Z. Zhang, B. Zhang, P. Yan, Comparative study of effect of raw and densified silica fume in the paste, mortar and concrete, Constr. Build. Mater. 105 (2016) 82–93. [CrossRef]
- P.P. Li, H.J.H. Brouwers, W. Chen, Q. Yu, Optimization and characterization of high-volume limestone powder in sustainable ultra-high performance concrete, Constr. Build. Mater. 242 (2020). [CrossRef]
- P. Stutzman, SEM Analysis and Computer Modelling of Hydration of Portland Cement Particles, (1994).
- F.U.A. Shaikh, S.W.M. Supit, P.K. Sarker, A study on the effect of nano silica on compressive strength of high volume fly ash mortars and concretes, Mater. Des. 60 (2014) 433–442. [CrossRef]
- F. Zunino, M. Lopez, Decoupling the physical and chemical effects of supplementary cementitious materials on strength and permeability: A multi-level approach, Cem. Concr. Compos. 65 (2016) 19–28. [CrossRef]
- M.C.G. Juenger, R. Siddique, Recent advances in understanding the role of supplementary cementitious materials in concrete, Cem. Concr. Res. 78 (2015) 71–80. [CrossRef]
- A.M. Ramezanianpour, R.D. Hooton, A study on hydration, compressive strength, and porosity of Portland-limestone cement mixes containing SCMs, Cem. Concr. Compos. 51 (2014) 1–13. [CrossRef]
- M. Antoni, J. Rossen, F. Martirena, K. Scrivener, Cement substitution by a combination of metakaolin and limestone, Cem. Concr. Res. 42 (2012) 1579–1589. [CrossRef]
- R. San Nicolas, M. Cyr, G. Escadeillas, Performance-based approach to durability of concrete containing flash-calcined metakaolin as cement replacement, Constr. Build. Mater. 55 (2014) 313–322. [CrossRef]
- R. Madandoust, M.M. Ranjbar, H.A. Moghadam, S.Y. Mousavi, Mechanical properties and durability assessment of rice husk ash concrete, Biosyst. Eng. 110 (2011) 144–152. [CrossRef]
- Nadeem, S.A. Memon, T.Y. Lo, Mechanical performance, durability, qualitative and quantitative analysis of microstructure of fly ash and Metakaolin mortar at elevated temperatures, Constr. Build. Mater. 38 (2013) 338–347. [CrossRef]
- T. Chappex, K.L. Scrivener, Cement and Concrete Research The in fl uence of aluminium on the dissolution of amorphous silica and its relation to alkali silica reaction, Cem. Concr. Res. 42 (2012) 1645–1649. [CrossRef]
- T. Özturan, Construc tion and Buildi ng Materi als Experimental evaluation and modeling of drying shrinkage behavior of metakaolin and calcined kaolin blended concretes, 43 (2013) 337–347. [CrossRef]
- S. Karaog, K. Mermerdas, E. Güneyisi, M. Gesog, Strength , permeability and shrinkage cracking of silica fume and metakaolin concretes, 34 (2012) 120–130. [CrossRef]
- S. Shahas, K. Girija, M. Nazeer, Materials Today : Proceedings Evaluation of pozzolanic activity of ternary blended supplementary cementitious material with rice husk ash and GGBS, Mater. Today Proc. (2023) 2–7. [CrossRef]
- S. Gupta, S. Chaudhary, State of the art review on supplementary cementitious materials in India – II: Characteristics of SCMs, effect on concrete and environmental impact, J. Clean. Prod. 357 (2022) 131945. [CrossRef]
- FAO, World Food and Agriculture - Statistical Yearbook 2021, Rome, 2021. [CrossRef]
- B.S. Thomas, J. Yang, K.H. Mo, J.A. Abdalla, R.A. Hawileh, E. Ariyachandra, Biomass ashes from agricultural wastes as supplementary cementitious materials or aggregate replacement in cement/geopolymer concrete: A comprehensive review, J. Build. Eng. 40 (2021) 102332. [CrossRef]
- H. Huang, X. Gao, H. Wang, H. Ye, Influence of rice husk ash on strength and permeability of ultra-high performance concrete, Constr. Build. Mater. 149 (2017) 621–628. [CrossRef]
- F.C. Lo, M.G. Lee, S.L. Lo, Effect of coal ash and rice husk ash partial replacement in ordinary Portland cement on pervious concrete, Constr. Build. Mater. 286 (2021) 122947. [CrossRef]
- V. Saraswathy, H.W. Song, Corrosion performance of rice husk ash blended concrete, Constr. Build. Mater. 21 (2007) 1779–1784. [CrossRef]
- L.C. Larissa, M.A. Marcos, M. V. Maria, N. S. L. de Souza, E.C. de Farias, Effect of high temperatures on self-compacting concrete with high levels of sugarcane bagasse ash and metakaolin, Constr. Build. Mater. 248 (2020) 118715. [CrossRef]
- V. Ríos-Parada, V.G. Jiménez-Quero, P.L. Valdez-Tamez, P. Montes-García, Characterization and use of an untreated Mexican sugarcane bagasse ash as supplementary material for the preparation of ternary concretes, Constr. Build. Mater. 157 (2017) 83–95. [CrossRef]
- P. Setayesh Gar, N. Suresh, V. Bindiganavile, Sugar cane bagasse ash as a pozzolanic admixture in concrete for resistance to sustained elevated temperatures, Constr. Build. Mater. 153 (2017) 929–936. [CrossRef]
- M.N. Amin, T. Murtaza, K. Shahzada, K. Khan, M. Adil, Pozzolanic potential and mechanical performance of wheat straw ash incorporated sustainable concrete, Sustain. 11 (2019) 1–20. [CrossRef]
- H. Binici, F. Yucegok, O. Aksogan, H. Kaplan, Effect of Corncob, Wheat Straw, and Plane Leaf Ashes as Mineral Admixtures on Concrete Durability, J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 20 (2008) 478–483. [CrossRef]
- Qudoos, H.G. Kim, Atta-ur-Rehman, J.S. Ryou, Effect of mechanical processing on the pozzolanic efficiency and the microstructure development of wheat straw ash blended cement composites, Constr. Build. Mater. 193 (2018) 481–490. [CrossRef]
- Jayaprithika, S.K. Sekar, Stress-strain characteristics and flexural behaviour of reinforced Eco-friendly coconut shell concrete, Constr. Build. Mater. 117 (2016) 244–250. [CrossRef]
- M. Khan, M. Ali, Improvement in concrete behavior with fly ash, silica-fume and coconut fibres, Constr. Build. Mater. 203 (2019) 174–187. [CrossRef]
- Oyedepo, L.M. Olanitori, S.P. Akande, Performance of coconut shell ash and palm kernel shell ash as partial replacement for cement in concrete, J. Build. Mater. Struct. 2 (2015) 18–24. [CrossRef]
- S. Assefa, Production of Lightweight Concrete Using Corncob Ash as Replacement of Cement in Concrete, Am. J. Civ. Eng. 7 (2019) 17. [CrossRef]
- J. Kamau, A. Ahmed, P. Hirst, J. Kangwa, Suitability of corncob ash as a supplementary cementitious material, Int. J. Mater. Sci. Eng. 4 (2016) 215–228. [CrossRef]
- FAO, Global cereal production heading for a record high, (2023). https://www.fao.org/worldfoodsituation/csdb/en/.
- X. Pan, Y. Sano, Fractionation of wheat straw by atmospheric acetic acid process, Bioresour. Technol. 96 (2005) 1256–1263. [CrossRef]
- FAO, Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010 Main Report, FAO For. Pap. 163 (2010) 37–72. https://www.fao.org/3/i1757e/i1757e.pdf.
- E. Ungerfeld, M. Vial, C. Jobet, M. Mathias, K. Peñalillo, Problemas de la quema de rastrojos y alternativas posibles - Mundoagro, (2021). https://mundoagro.cl/problemas-de-la-quema-de-rastrojos-y-alternativas-posibles/# (accessed June 29, 2023).
- Ruiz, M. Wolff, M. Claret, Rastrojos de cultivos anuales y residuos forestales, Rastrojos Cultiv. Anu. y Residuos For. (2015) 10–29.
- P. Muñoz, M.A. Mendívil, V. Letelier, M.P. Morales, Thermal and mechanical properties of fired clay bricks made by using grapevine shoots as pore forming agent. Influence of particle size and percentage of replacement, Constr. Build. Mater. 224 (2019) 639–658. [CrossRef]
- H. Biricik, F. Aköz, I. Berktay, A.N. Tulgar, Study of pozzolanic properties of wheat straw ash, 29 (1999) 637–643.
- [N.M. Al-akhras, B.A. Abu-alfoul, Effect of wheat straw ash on mechanical properties of autoclaved mortar, 8846 (2002) 0–5. [CrossRef]
- F.F. Ataie, K.A. Riding, Thermochemical Pretreatments for Agricultural Residue Ash Production for Concrete, J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 25 (2013) 1703–1711. [CrossRef]
- S.A. Memon, I. Wahid, M.K. Khan, M.A. Tanoli, M. Bimaganbetova, Environmentally friendly utilization of wheat straw ash in cement-based composites, Sustain. 10 (2018) 1–21. [CrossRef]
- ASTM C595-21, Standard Specification for Blended Hydraulic Cements, Astm . (2021) 1–10. www.astm.org,.
- R. Maddalena, J.J. Roberts, A. Hamilton, Can Portland cement be replaced by low-carbon alternative materials? A study on the thermal properties and carbon emissions of innovative cements, J. Clean. Prod. 186 (2018) 933–942. [CrossRef]
- R.N. González-Kunz, P. Pineda, A. Bras, L. Morillas, Plant biomass ashes in cement-based building materials. Feasibility as eco-efficient structural mortars and grouts, Sustain. Cities Soc. 31 (2017) 151–172. [CrossRef]
- K. Khan, M. Ishfaq, M.N. Amin, K. Shahzada, N. Wahab, M.I. Faraz, Evaluation of Mechanical and Microstructural Properties and Global Warming Potential of Green Concrete with Wheat Straw Ash and Silica Fume, Materials (Basel). 15 (2022) 3177. [CrossRef]
- M.A. Al-Kadhim Hameed, A.K. Razzq Alzerjawi, Z.A. Mahdi, Studying the behavior of the concrete mixture with wheat straw as part of the cement, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1973 (2021). [CrossRef]
- M. Muthukumar, D. Mohan, M. Rajendran, Optimization of mix proportions of mineral aggregates using Box Behnken design of experiments, Cem. Concr. Compos. 25 (2003) 751–758. [CrossRef]
- S.A. Memon, U. Javed, M. Haris, R.A. Khushnood, J. Kim, Incorporation of wheat straw ash as partial sand replacement for production of eco-friendly concrete, Materials (Basel). 14 (2021). [CrossRef]
- T. Luo, C. Hua, F. Liu, Q. Sun, Y. Yi, X. Pan, Effect of adding solid waste silica fume as a cement paste replacement on the properties of fresh and hardened concrete, Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 16 (2022) 1–14. [CrossRef]
- S. Bhanja, B. Sengupta, Influence of silica fume on the tensile strength of concrete, Cem. Concr. Res. 35 (2005) 743–747. [CrossRef]
- S.K. Das, S.M. Mustakim, A. Adesina, J. Mishra, T.S. Alomayri, H.S. Assaedi, C.R. Kaze, Fresh, strength and microstructure properties of geopolymer concrete incorporating lime and silica fume as replacement of fly ash, J. Build. Eng. 32 (2020) 101780. [CrossRef]
- G.E.P. Box, K.B. Wilson, On the Experimental Attainment of Optimum Conditions, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. 13 (1951) 1–38. [CrossRef]
- M.A. DeRousseau, J.R. Kasprzyk, W. V. Srubar, Computational design optimization of concrete mixtures: A review, Cem. Concr. Res. 109 (2018) 42–53. [CrossRef]
- ASTM-C305-20, Standard Practice for Supplementation, ASTM Stand. Guid. (2020). [CrossRef]
- ASTM Committee C109, Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars, Annu. B. ASTM Stand. 04 (2021) 109. [CrossRef]
- ASTM-C511-13, Standard Specification for Mixing Rooms , Moist Cabinets , Moist Rooms , and Water, ASTM Stand. Guid. (2015) 23–25.
- ASTM C1679, Standard Practice for Measuring Hydration Kinetics of Hydraulic Cementitious Mixtures Using Isothermal Calorimetry, Am. Soc. Test. Mater. West Conshohocken, PA, USA. 04 (2014) 1–15.
- J. Mena, M. González, J.C. Remesar, M. Lopez, Developing a very high-strength low-CO2 cementitious matrix based on a multi-binder approach for structural lightweight aggregate concrete, Constr. Build. Mater. 234 (2020) 117830. [CrossRef]
- J. Yajun, J.H. Cahyadi, Effects of densified silica fume on microstructure and compressive strength of blended cement pastes, 33 (2003) 1543–1548. [CrossRef]
- M.I.S. De Rojas, J. Rivera, M. Frías, Influence of the microsilica state on pozzolanic reaction rate, 29 (1999) 945–949.
- D.R.G. Mitchell, I. Hinczak, R.A. Day, INTERACTION OF SILICA FUME WITH CALCIUM HYDROXIDE SOLUTIONS, 28 (1998) 1571–1584.
- I.A. Shar, F.A. Memon, N. Bheel, Z.H. Shaikh, A.A. Dayo, Use of Wheat Straw Ash as Cement Replacement Material in the Concrete, 3 (2019) 5–7.















| Material | CO2eq (kg/kg) | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Cement | 0.813 | [61] |
| Biomass ash | 0.05 | [62] |
| SF | 0.00001 | [61] |
| Compounds | Cement (%) | WSA (%) | SF (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 59.0 | 5.33 | 0.18 | |
| 24.8 | 27.12 | 94.50 | |
| 5.80 | 0.57 | - | |
| 3.29 | 0.15 | 0.14 | |
| 2.88 | 0.79 | - | |
| 1.07 | 0.52 | - | |
| 0.79 | 6.81 | 0.45 | |
| 0.23 | - | - | |
| 0.09 | - | - | |
| - | 1.18 | - | |
| - | 0.69 | - | |
| - | 0.42 | - | |
| - | 0.17 | - | |
| 2.01 | - | 4.76 |
| Levels in the BBD model | Experimental composition | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mixes nomenclature | W/B | WSA | SF | W/B | WSA (%) | SF (%) |
| B0.4W0S5 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 0.4 | 0 | 5 |
| B0.6W0S5 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 0.6 | 0 | 5 |
| B0.4W20S5 | -1 | 1 | 0 | 0.4 | 20 | 5 |
| B0.6W20S5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.6 | 20 | 5 |
| B0.4W10S0 | -1 | 0 | -1 | 0.4 | 10 | 0 |
| B0.6W10S0 | 1 | 0 | -1 | 0.6 | 10 | 0 |
| B0.4W10S10 | -1 | 0 | 1 | 0.4 | 10 | 10 |
| B0.6W10S10 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.6 | 10 | 10 |
| B0.5W0S0 | 0 | -1 | -1 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 |
| B0.5W20S0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0.5 | 20 | 0 |
| B0.5W0S10 | 0 | -1 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | 10 |
| B0.5W20S10 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 20 | 10 |
| B0.5W10S5-1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | 10 | 5 |
| B0.5W10S5-2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | 10 | 5 |
| B0.5W10S5-3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | 10 | 5 |
| Age | W | p value |
|---|---|---|
| 7 days | 0.97 | 0.86 |
| 28 days | 0.97 | 0.89 |
| 56 days | 0.97 | 0.85 |
| Factor | Coefficient | Std. Error | t value | Pr ( > |t|) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constant | 17.62 | 0.65 | 27.07 | 0.0000000001093*** |
| W/B | -4.69 | 0.61 | -7.7 | 0.01649*** |
| WSA | -3.3 | 0.61 | -5.14 | 0.0004356*** |
| W/B:WSA | 4.13 | 0.86 | 4.8 | 0.0007220*** |
| (W/B)2 | -2.14 | 0.89 | -2.4 | 0.0373727* |
| Note: significance codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 | ||||
| Factor | Coefficient | Std. Error | t value | Pr ( > |t|) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constant | 25.13 | 1.14 | 22.04 | 0.00001896*** |
| W/B | -5.31 | 0.84 | -6.32 | 0.0002274*** |
| WSA | -5.35 | 0.84 | -6.38 | 0.0002136*** |
| SF | -1.53 | 0.84 | -1.82 | 0.1057541 |
| W/B:WSA | 3.48 | 1.19 | 2.93 | 0.0189174* |
| (W/B)2 | -3.39 | 1.23 | -2.75 | 0.0249159* |
| (SF)2 | 3.52 | 1.23 | 2.86 | 0.0211537* |
| Note. Significance codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 | ||||
| Factor | Coefficient | Std. Error | t value | Pr ( > |t|) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constant | 26.21 | 1.25 | 21.04 | 0.000001308*** |
| W/B | -5.21 | 1.17 | -4.47 | 0.001203** |
| WSA | -5.08 | 1.17 | -4.36 | 0.001423** |
| SF | 0.8 | 1.17 | 0.68 | 0.510685 |
| (SF)2 | 5.52 | 1.71 | 3.23 | 0.008980** |
| Note. Significance codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 | ||||
| Mixtures | W/B | WSA | SF | W/B | WSA (%) | SF (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B0.5W15S10 | 0 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 15 | 10 |
| B0.51W12S9 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.51 | 12 | 9 |
| B0.5W12S5 | 0 | 0.2 | 0 | 0.5 | 12 | 5 |
| Mixtures | Model error 7 days (%) | Model error 28 days (%) | Model error 56 days (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| B0.5W15S10 | 4.8 | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| B0.51W12S9 | 2.2 | 5.4 | 6.1 |
| B0.5W12S5 | 5.6 | 0.3 | -2.7 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).