Submitted:
07 May 2024
Posted:
07 May 2024
You are already at the latest version
Abstract
Keywords:
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Prevalence and Incidence of B. linicola in Yunnan P. notoginseng Fields
2.2. Morphological Study
2.3. Growth Characteristics at Different Temperatures
2.4. Growth Characteristics at Different pH Values
2.5. Study on the Source of B. linicola Primary Infection
2.5.1. Investigation of Infection Sources
2.5.2. Investigation into Transmission Mode
2.6. Sensitivity Testing of B. linicola to Different Fungicides
2.6.1. Determination of Antibacterial Activity of Five Drugs
2.6.2. Det
2.6.3. Field Trials
2.7. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Prevalence and Incidence of B. linicola in Yunnan P. notoginseng Fields
3.1.2. Epidemics of P. notoginseng Leaf Spot under Forest Conditions
3.2. Morphological Study
3.3. Growth Characteristics at Different Temperatures
3.4. Growth Characteristics at Different pH Values
3.5. Study on the Source of Primary Infection of B. linicola
3.5.1. Investigation into Infection Sources
3.5.2. Investigation of Transmission Mode
3.6. Sensitivity Testing of B. linicola to Different Fungicides
3.6.1. Field Trials
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Tang, G.Z. Information Analysis Based on the Development of the Panax notoginseng Industry [Master’s Thesis]; Yunnan University: Kunming, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, T.; Guo, R.X.; Zhou, G.H.; Zhou, X.D.; Kou, Z.Z.; Sui, F.; Li, C.; Tang, L.Y.; Wang, Z.J. Traditional uses, botany, phytochemistry, pharmacology and toxicology of Panax notoginseng (Burk.) F.H. Chen: A review. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2016, 188, 234–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ng, T.B. Pharmacological activity of Sanchi ginseng (Panax notoginseng). J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2006, 58, 1007–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cui, X.M.; Huang, L.Q.; Guo, L.P.; Liu, D.H. Chinese Sanqi industry status and development countermeasures. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2014, 39, 553–557. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Zhan, P.; Wei, M.T.; Xu, B.; Han, R.L. Research on the development status and countermeasures of China’s Panax notoginseng industry based on the industrial chain. North. Hortic. 2021, 14, 158–164. [Google Scholar]
- Ren, Z.Y.; Wang, T.; Shen, M. The path of science and technology innovation in poverty alleviation in Lancang Lohu autonomous county of Yunnan Province: A case in science and technology poverty alleviation of academician Zhu Youyongs’Team. J. Yunnan Agric. Univ. (Soc. Sci.). 2019, 13, 14–19. [Google Scholar]
- Yu, Z.F.; Zhang, R.J. Development advantages and key problems of organic Panax notoginseng industry under forest in Pu’er city. Forest Inventory Plan. 2019, 44, 177–181. [Google Scholar]
- Li, J.B.; Ai, M.T.; Hou, J.; Zhu, P.Q.; Cui, X.M.; Yang, Q. Plant–pathogen interaction with root rot of Panax notoginseng as a model: Insight into pathogen pathogenesis, plant defence response and biological control. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2024, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, P.P. Correlation Between Root Rot with Rhizosphere and Rootmicroorganisms and Mitigation Measures of Panax notoginseng [Master’s Thesis]; Kunming University of Science and Technology: Kunming, China, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, K.; Wang, H.L.; Luo, L.F.; Zhu, S.S.; Huang, H.P.; Wei, Z.X.; Zhu, Y.Y.; Guo, L.W.; He, X.H. Effects of different soil moisture on the growth, quality, and root rot disease of organic Panax notoginseng cultivated under pine forests. J. Environ. Manage 2022, 329, 117069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liang, T.T.; Li, X.; Li, Y.Y.; Cui, X.M.; Liu, D.Q. First report of a Panax notoginseng leaf disease caused by Alternaria alternata in China. Plant Dis. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.B.; Bao, Y.L.; Wang, Z.R.; Yang, Q.; Cui, X.M. Research progress in diseases of Panax notoginseng. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2022, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lan, C.Z.; Lin, X. Control effects of seven kinds of fungicides and rain-shelter cultivation on round spot of Panax notoginseng planted under forest. Mod. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2023, 831, 67–70. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, K.; Wang, H.L.; Ye, C.; Wang, Z.H.; Ye, K.H.; Zhang, S.; Huang, H.P.; Wei, Z.X.; Zhu, S.S.; Zhu, Y.Y.; et al. Infection characteristics and physical prevention strategy of Panax notoginseng Round spot disease caused by Mycocentrospora acerina. Plant Dis. 2022, 106, 2607–2617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, K.; Zhuang, S.; Guo, L.W.; Jiang, C.H.; Wang, Z.H.; Zhu, Y.Y.; He, X.H. Occurrence of Understory Planted Panax notoginseng Round Spot in Lancang County and its Control Effect of Rain-sheltered Cultivation. Journal of Chinese Medicinal Materials 2020, 43, 2857–2863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qian, N.; Cheng, Y.P.; Zhang, L.; Feng, C.L.; Zhang, G.Z.; Lu, X.L.; Zhao, W.S. First report of leaf spot disease caused by Boeremia linicola on Trifolium repens in China. Plant Dis. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guan, Y.M.; Zhang, S.N.; Ma, Y.Y.; Zhang, Y. Leaf spot caused by Boeremia linicola on Siberian ginseng in China. Plant Dis. 2020, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Garibaldi, A.; Gilardi, G.; Franco Ortega, S.; Gullino, M.L. First report of a leaf spot caused by Boeremia Exigua var. linicola on autumn sage (Salvia greggii) in Italy and worldwide. Plant Dis. 2016, 100, 1777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, G.B.; Oh, T.H.; Ryu, J.T.; Kim, W. Stem and leaf rot of tomato caused by Boeremia linicola. Res. Plant Dis. 2022, 28, 108–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lahlali, R.; Ezrari, S.; Radouane, N.; Kenfaoui, J.; Esmaeel, Q.; El Hamss, H.; Belabess, Z.; Barka, E.A. Biological control of plant pathogens: A global perspective. Microorganisms. 2022, 10, 596–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, J.L.; Liu, K.; Miao, C.P.; Sun, S.Z.; Chen, Y.W.; Xu, L.H.; Guan, H.L.; Zhao, L.X. Salt tolerance of endophytic Trichoderma koningiopsis YIM PH30002 and its volatile organic compounds (VOCs) allelopathic activity against phytopathogens associated with Panax notoginseng. Ann. Microbiol. 2016, 66, 981–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.X.; Zhao, X.L.; Wu, K.; Liang, C.; Liu, J.H.; Yang, H.; Wang, C.M.; Yang, B.; Yin, F.; Zhang, W.D. Isolation and characterization of Bacillus velezensis strain B19 for biocontrol of Panax notoginseng root rot. Biol. Control. 2023, 185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Radics, L.; Incze, M.; Dornberger, K.; Thrum, H. ; Tetramycin B, a new polyene macrolide antibiotic. Tetrahedron. 1982, 38, 183–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, W.Q.; Xiang, L.B.; Yu, D.Z.; Gong, S.J.; Yang, L.J. Impact of the biofungicide tetramycin on the development of Fusarium Head Blight, grain yield and deoxynivalenol accumulation in wheat. World Mycotoxin J. 2020, 13, 235–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, W.Z.; Long, Y.H.; Yin, X.H.; Wang, W.Z.; Zhang, R.Q.; Mo, F.X.; Zhang, Z.Z.; Chen, T.T.; Chen, J.; Wang, B.C.; et al. Antifungal activity and mechanism of tetramycin against Alternaria alternata, the soft rot causing fungi in kiwifruit. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2023, 192, 105409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tiilikkala, K.; Fagernäs, L.; Tiilikkala, J. History and use of wood pyrolysis liquids as biocide and plant protection product. Open Agric. 2010, 4, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.G.; Han, L.H.; Wu, S.Q.; Piao, R.Z.; Liu, H.F. Inhibition effects of wood vinegar on Alternaria panax and Botrytis cinerea. Zhong Yao Cai. 2014, 37, 1525–1528. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Yu, Y.; Liu, H.F.; Xia, H.R.; Chu, Z.H. Double- or triple-tiered protection: Prospects for the sustainable application of copper-based antimicrobial compounds for another fourteen decades. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, X.Q.; Zhu, F.R.; Bin, R.P.; Liao, Y.M.; Wei, H.L.; Li, Y. Determination of pathogenicity of pathogenic bacteria in different parts of mulberry tree. Guangxi Seric. 2016, 53, 12–15. [Google Scholar]
- Colmán, A.; Lima, M.I.; Costa, H.; Barreto, R.W. Boeremia exigua causing leaf spots on sweet potato in Brazil. Australasian plant disease notes. J. Australas. Plant Pathol. Soc. 2020, 15, 403–414. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Y.P.; You, M.P.; Finnegan, P.M.; Khan, T.N.; Lanoiselet, V.; Eyres, N.; Barbetti, M.J. First report of black spot caused by Boeremia exigua var. exigua on field pea in Australia. Plant Dis. 2012, 96, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Q.; Wang, J.; Song, Q.; Yin, C.; Zhang, Z.; Tan, L.; Weng, Q. First report of leaf blight on Dumasia villosa caused by Boeremia exigua in China. Plant Dis. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.L.; Yang, K.; Huang, H.P.; Wei, Z.X.; Zhu, Y.Y.; Guo, L.W.; He, X.H. First report of leaf spot caused by Boeremia exigua on panax ginseng in Liaoning, China. Plant Dis. 2024, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kowalski, T.; Kraj, W.; Bednarz, B.; Rossa, R. The association of Boeremia lilacis with necrotic lesions on shoots and leaf petioles and Its pathogenicity towards Fraxinus excelsior. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2019, 154, 961–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zimowska, B.; Król, E.D. Effect of selected preparations on growth and development Boeremia strasseri, the causal agent of black stem and rhizomes rot of peppermint (Mentha piperita). Acta Sci.Pol.Hortorum Cultus. 2018, 17, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koike, S.T.; Groenewald, J.Z.; Crous, P.W. First report of black rot caused by Boeremia exigua var. pseudolilacis on artichoke in California. Plant Dis. 2016, 100, 524–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malcolmson, J.F. Some factors affecting the occurrence and development in potatoes of gangrene caused by Phoma Solanicola Prill & Delacr. Ann. Appl. Biol. 1958, 46, 639–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malcolmson, J.F.; Gray, E.G. Factors affecting the occurrence of gangrene (Phoma exigua) in potatoes. Ann. Appl. Biol. 1968, 62, 77–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, Y.J.; Huang, J.X.; Qi, L.L.; Zhang, X.L.; Liu, J.H.; Guan, H.L.; Wang, C.J.; Tang, G.M.; Dou, X.L.; Lu, M. Bacillus subtilis strain BS06 protects soybean roots from Fusarium oxysporum infection. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2021, 368, fnab102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shen, Y.C.; Cao, B.B.; Hu, M.; Zhang, S.S.; Li, J.; Pu, Q.; Li, O.; Zeng, G.H.; Hu, X.F. Screening and activity analysis of antagonistic bacteria against root rot on Panax notoginseng. J. Zhejiang Sci-Tech Universit. 2019, 41, 806–811. [Google Scholar]
- Beneduzi, A.; Ambrosini, A.; Passaglia, L.M.P. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): Their potential as antagonists and biocontrol agents. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2012, 35 (Supplement), 1044–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yao, X.; Guo, H.L.; Zhang, K.X.; Zhao, M.Y.; Ruan, J.J.; Chen, J. Trichoderma and its role in biological control of plant fungal and nematode disease. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1160551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elad, Y. Biological control of foliar pathogens by means of Trichoderma harzianum and potential modes of action. Crop Prot. 2000, 19, 709–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, S.W.; Zheng, Q.; Xu, B.L.; Liu, J. Identification of the fungal pathogens of postharvest disease on peach fruits and the control mechanisms of Bacillus subtilis JK-14. Toxins. 2019, 11, 322–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhong, L.J.; Zhao, X.H.; Zhang, Q.H.; Xu, C.; Zhu, H.L. Studies on the rice resistance to rice blast induced by tetramycin. J. Anhui Agric. Sci. 2010, 38, 6263–6264. [Google Scholar]
- Monte, E. Understanding Trichoderma: Between biotechnology and microbial ecology. Int. Microbiol. 2001, 4, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gao, Y.Y.; He, L.F.; Li, X.X.; Lin, J.; Mu, W.; Liu, F. Toxicity and biochemical action of the antibiotic fungicide tetramycin on Colletotrichum scovillei. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2018, 147, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Luo, C.; Guo, L.W.; Li, J.Z.; Yang, K.; Wang, H.L.; Zhang, S.; Su, S.; Zhu, Y.Y.; He, X.H. Effects of Treating Seeds with Three Microbial agents on Growth and seedling Quality of Panax notoginseng. J. China Agric. Univ. 2022, 27, 189–198. [Google Scholar]
- An, P.P.; Yang, X.B.; Yu, J.; Qi, J.R.; Ren, X.Y.; Kong, Q.J. α-terpineol and terpene-4-ol, the critical components of tea tree oil, exert antifungal activities in vitro and in vivo against Aspergillus niger in grapes by inducing morphous damage and metabolic changes of fungus. Food Control. 2019, 98, 42–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, H.Y.; Fu, K.J.; Shen, Y.; Li, R.H.; Su, Y.B.; Deng, Y.S.; Xia, Y.S.; Zhang, N.M. Physiological and biochemical mechanisms of wood vinegar-induced stress response against tomato fusarium wilt disease. Plants (Basel). 2024, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xing-dong, L.; Hua-li, X. Antifungal activity of the essential oil of Zanthoxylum bungeanum and its major constituent on Fusarium sulphureum and dry rot of potato tubers. Phytoparasitica. 2014, 42, 509–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anna, T.L.; Valeria, I.; Federica, C. Copper in plant protection: Current situation and prospects. Phytopathologia Mediterr. 2018, 57, 201–236. [Google Scholar]
- GB/T 19630–2019Standardization Administration of China. Organic Products—Requirements for Production, Processing, Labeling and Management System, 2019.



















| Incidence level | Incidence degree | Representative value |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | No or virtually no spots | 0 |
| 2 | Spots are small, 1–2 spots per leaf, less than 5% of leaf area | 1 |
| 3 | More than 2 spots per leaf, 5–25% of leaf area | 2 |
| 4 | Spots cover 25–50% of leaf area, leaves do not fall off, or 1/3 of the stem is diseased | 3 |
| 5 | Spots occupy more than 50% of the leaf area, some or all of the leaves fall off, only the stem remains or the plant dies | 4 |
| Tested agent | Concentration gradient | Unit | ||||
| Tetramycin | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 1.5 | mg/L |
| copper abietate | 107.25 | 214.5 | 429 | 858 | 1,716 | mg/L |
| α-terpineol | 10 | 50 | 100 | 200 | — | μL/mL |
| α-pinene | 10 | 50 | 100 | 200 | — | μL/mL |
| Sophora flavescens alt WV | 5,000 | 10,000 | 20,000 | 40,000 | — | mg/L |
| Treatment number | Test agent | Treatment concentration | Treatment method |
| TCK | Clear water control | — | Atomizing |
| T1-1 | 0.3% tetramycin | 500× | |
| T1-2 | 1,000× | ||
| T1-3 | 2,000× | ||
| T2-1 | 20% copper abietate | 500× | |
| T2-2 | 1,000× | ||
| T2-3 | 2,000× | ||
| T3-1 | α-terpineol | 10,000× | |
| T3-2 | 25,000× | ||
| T3-3 | 50,000× | ||
| T4-1 | α-pinene | 10,000× | |
| T4-2 | 25,000× | ||
| T4-3 | 50,000× | ||
| T5-1 | Sophora flavescens alt WV | 300× | |
| T5-2 | 600× | ||
| T5-3 | 900× | ||
| T6-1 | T. harzianum | 100 g/acres | |
| T6-2 | T. atroviride | 100 g/acres | |
| T7-1 | B. subtilis | 100 g/acres |
| Meteorological factor | Pearson correlation coefficient |
| Mean monthly temperature, ℃ | -0.93 |
| Monthly minimum temperature, ℃ | -0.89 |
| Monthly maximum temperature, ℃ | -0.31 |
| Average monthly relative humidity, % | -0.96 |
| Monthly minimum relative humidity, % | -0.97 |
| Maximum relative humidity in month, % | 0.70 |
| Treatment | Inhibition rate range (%) | Virulence regression equation | EC50 | Correlation coefficient (R2) |
| Tetramycin | 38.56–74.67 | y=1.4x+5.31 | 0.60 (mg/L) | 0.9368 |
| copper abietate | 3.10–34.76 | y=1.17x+0.91 | 3,120.05 (mg/L) | 0.9766 |
| α-terpineol | 24.46–72.40 | y=1.02x+3.29 | 48.14 (μL /mL) | 0.9953 |
| WV | 1.62–78.82 | y=3.29x-9.95 | 27,385 (mg/L) | 0.9708 |
| α-pinene | 0–13.62 | — | — | — |
| T. atroviride | 52.48 | — | — | — |
| T. harzianum | 44.19 | — | — | — |
| B. subtilis | 78.45 | — | — | — |
| Treatment | Test agent | Disease index before application | Disease index after application | Relative control efficiency |
| TCK | Clear water control | 0.57±0.12 | 2.9±0.35 | |
| T1-1 |
0.3% tetramycin |
2.45±0.41 | 3.92±1.03 | 70.2±3.24a |
| T1-2 | 0.7±0.12 | 0.89±0.16 | 69.95±9.6a | |
| T1-3 | 1.54±0.38 | 3.19±1.04 | 57.72±13.35a | |
| T2-1 | 20% copper rosinate | 1.94±0.25 | 2.65±0.48 | 82.57±5.42a |
| T2-2 | 1±0.26 | 1.47±0.09 | 55.05±27.7a | |
| T2-3 | 0.62±0.15 | 1.11±0.27 | 59.62±16.1a | |
| T3-1 | α-terpineol | 1.37±0.3 | 2.98±0.72 | 56.83±10.83a |
| T3-2 | 1.04±0.26 | 2.52±0.61 | 49.32±13.28a | |
| T3-3 | 1.27±0.32 | 2.43±0.19 | 51.92±22.66a | |
| T4-1 | α-pinene | 1.82±0.18 | 3.54±0.22 | 58.45±13.53a |
| T4-2 | 1.33±0.05 | 3.24±0.32 | 50.52±12.55a | |
| T4-3 | 1.89±0.57 | 3.59±0.61 | 51.74±19.62a | |
| T5-1 | WV | 1.16±0.14 | 1.95±0.31 | 65.06±9.12a |
| T5-2 | 1.38±0.34 | 2.35±0.47 | 64.68±6.86a | |
| T5-3 | 1.71±0.3 | 2.43±0.41 | 69.72±9.32a | |
| T6-1 | T. atroviride | 0.6±0.05 | 2.16±0.63 | 40.04±20.02a |
| T6-2 | T. harzianum | 0.56±0.06 | 0.75±0.16 | 71.3±9.41a |
| T7-1 | B. subtilis | 1.09±0.25 | 1.27±0.25 | 72.56±8.11a |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).